IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE...

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN TRUDEAU, Defendant.

))))))))))))

Case No. 03-C-3904 Hon. Robert W. Gettleman

FTC’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A STATEMENT CONCERNING

DEFENDANT’S LETTERS OF DIRECTION

In light of the importance of this litigation and Defendant Kevin Trudeau’s proposal on

Friday afternoon to send “Letters of Direction” to various persons and institutions concerning his

assets, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission respectfully requests leave to file a statement

addressing this proposal prior to the imposition of Court-ordered coercive sanctions tomorrow.

The proposed statement is attached hereto.

The FTC has noticed this motion for the already-scheduled status conference Tuesday

morning, when the FTC anticipates Trudeau will argue that these letters purge his contempt or,

alternatively, that the Court should yet again defer sanctions for an indefinite time until he

receives responses to these letters. The proposed filing addresses these new arguments, which

the FTC respectfully urges the Court to reject. Dated: October 21, 2013 David O’Toole ([email protected]) Federal Trade Commission 55 West Monroe Street, Suite 1825 Chicago, Illinois 60603-5001 Phone: (312) 960-5601 Fax: (312) 960-5600

Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Jonathan Cohen Michael Mora ([email protected]) Jonathan Cohen ([email protected]) Amanda B. Kostner ([email protected]) Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. M-8102B Washington, DC 20580 Phone: 202-326-3373; -2551; -2880

Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 774 Filed: 10/21/13 of 2 PageID #:13817

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jonathan Cohen, hereby certify that on October 21, 2013, I caused to be served true copies of the foregoing by electronic means, by filing such documents through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing System, which will send notification of such filing to: Kimball Richard Anderson [email protected] Thomas Lee Kirsch, II [email protected] Katherine E. Rohlf [email protected] Blair R. Zanzig [email protected]

/s/ Jonathan Cohen Jonathan Cohen ([email protected]) Attorney for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission

Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 774 Filed: 10/21/13 of 2 PageID #:13818



))))))))))))


FTC’S STATEMENT CONCERNING DEFENDANT’S LETTERS OF DIRECTION

I. Introduction

Last month, the Court found that Trudeau “has not been fully cooperative or candid with

the Receiver.” DE751 (Sept. 18, 2013). Last week, the Court found that “Trudeau has continued

to falsely claim that he has and controls no assets that would be available to satisfy the remedial

obligation imposed upon him by the Court’s June 2010 order,” and ordered him incarcerated

“until he complies with any of the four conditions” the Court’s August 7, 2013 Receivership

Order identified. DE772 (Oct. 16, 2013) at 2. Although the Court deferred coercive sanctions

until October 22 to “allow Trudeau to attend a legal defense fundraising meeting in Washington,

D.C. on October 21, 2013,”1 id. at 2, the Court ordered that, after Trudeau completes this

fundraising, he must report to the United States Marshal “immediately” following the next day’s

hearing, see id. at 2-3.

On Friday, the FTC listened to a teleconference with Trudeau, his attorneys, and the

Receiver’s representatives.2 Based on that call, the FTC understands that Trudeau will send

additional “Letters of Direction” to various persons and institutions asking them to confirm that

1 During Friday’s teleconference, Trudeau stated that he will attend a fundraising dinner

on October 20 and another fundraising event on October 21. PXA at ¶ 19. 2 The FTC was permitted to listen, but was asked not to participate.

Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 774-1 Filed: 10/21/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:13819

2

he has no assets,3 and that he will argue tomorrow that these letters purge his contempt or,

alternatively, that the Court should yet again defer sanctions for an indefinite time until he

receives responses to these letters. The FTC respectfully urges the Court to reject these new

arguments and continue with the course its prior orders established.

II. Discussion

For several reasons, the Court should proceed with coercive sanctions in accordance with

its orders: (1) the letters do not change the Court’s prior findings or purge Trudeau’s contempt;

(2) consumers should not have to wait for responses from third parties when the primary issue is

what Trudeau knows; (3) because Trudeau is not yet incarcerated, the letters may be ineffective

or counterproductive; (4) the letters are unlikely to explain various transfers, commissions,

royalties, or otherwise prove that Trudeau has purged; and (5) responses will not make Trudeau’s

incredible claims about gold bars, coins, and cufflinks any more plausible.4

3 Trudeau also made two additional offers. First, Trudeau proposed to “send a letter [of

direction] to every bank in the world,” to confirm that he does not have any unknown accounts. PXA at ¶ 17. Feasibility aside, offshore accounts are almost certainly held in the name of nominees (like Trudeau’s wife). For instance, the Global Bank of Commerce in Antigua already confirmed that Trudeau does not have an account, but Nataliya Babenko does—where she received a transfer from GIN FDN after the Court’s asset freeze and Receivership Order. See PXA:15 (transfer from National Westminster Bank); Receiver’s Supp. Report (DE750-1) (Sept. 16, 2013) at 2. Second, Trudeau offered to sit down with the Receiver at the 130 Quail Ridge Drive offices and “spend hours” reviewing financial records that might help “jog [his] memory.” PXA at ¶ 18. The Receiver already has indicated that Trudeau’s purported forensic accounting assistance is unnecessary (as opposed to his straightforward disclosure of assets), see DE764 (Oct. 4, 2013) at 2, and Trudeau’s newfound financial knowledge stands in marked contrast to his prior emphatic position that associates like Neil Sant and Michael Dow handled everything for him. In fact, on Friday’s call, Trudeau compared himself to Oprah Winfrey (a television personality with significant financial interests), and stated that, like her, “I don’t know anything about the money coming in and going out.” PXA at ¶ 18.

4 The FTC also wishes to correct an error FTC counsel made Wednesday. Specifically, counsel stated that the Trudeau had not disclosed statements for Global Information Network FDN (“GIN FDN”) accounts in Liechtenstein and the U.K. Although the FTC has not received such statements, the Receiver clarified to the FTC that Trudeau associate Lee Kenny disclosed the U.K. statements to the Receiver, and the Receiver located Liechtenstein statements in Sant’s office. The issue is not the absence of statements, but where the money from these accounts went. As the Receiver identified in his Supplemental Report (and as the FTC’s prior filing discussed), between January 1, 2013 and September 6, 2013, more than $15 million flowed into GIN FDN accounts, and more than $16 million flowed out. See PXA:1, DE750-1 (Sept. 16, 2013). Unexplained payments from GIN FDN during this period include, among others, $1,360,636.66 to Global Sales Solutions (which is an entity in the Receivership, see DE742 (Aug. 7, 2013) at 4), $644,727.70 to Office Pool GmbH, and $129,692.34 to W.P. Barlow, whom Trudeau engaged to lobby the FTC to drop this case. See PXA:1 at 2, DE750-1 (Sept. 16, 2013);


3

A. The Letters Do Not Alter Any of the Court’s Prior Findings or Purge Trudeau’s Contempt.

Trudeau must be released when the Court is satisfied that he has met one of the four

purge conditions—but the Court should not release him earlier, or withdraw its prior order

requiring coercive incarceration. Undoubtedly, Trudeau will continue facially cooperative

actions that do not actually disclose what he knows about his assets—which is why the Court

ordered coercive incarceration in the first place. The fact that Trudeau sends these letters does

not reveal (and will not reveal) what Trudeau knows about his assets, nor does it make Trudeau

any more honest, nor does it alter the Court’s conclusion that he “continue[s] to falsely claim that

he has and controls no assets” that he can use to redress consumers. See DE772 (Oct. 16, 2013)

at 2. Accordingly, these letters do not purge Trudeau’s contempt, and are not a reason to defer

the sanction yet again. B. Consumers Should Not Have To Wait for Responses to the Letters When the

Issue Is What Trudeau Knows.

Consumers already have waited years for redress, and they should not have to wait any

longer. First, the easiest and quickest way for Trudeau to purge his contempt is for him to be

fully forthcoming with respect to every aspect of his financial affairs ranging from royalties to

the Kiev apartment. This could occur immediately. Instead, Trudeau has elected to proceed with

a time-consuming alternative that will not disclose the most important information—namely,

what Trudeau knows about his assets. Even if these letters could purge his contempt (and they

cannot), Trudeau’s decision to attempt to purge by urging third parties to vouch for his stories is

not a basis to defer sanctions further.

Second, there is no way to know when responses to Trudeau’s new round of letters will

arrive, if ever. Nor is there any way to know what the responses will say (although they will not

reveal what Trudeau knows about his assets). In fact, if Trudeau’s wife and associates believe

the Court will wait to incarcerate him until they respond, their responses to Trudeau’s inquiries

see also PXA:2 (emails regarding lobbying efforts).


4

will not arrive with any dispatch. Because the letters will take time without forcing Trudeau to

reveal what he knows, they are not a reason to defer sanctions yet again.

C. Letters of Direction Are Often Ineffective and May Be Counterproductive.

Although sending numerous “letters of direction” helps Trudeau appear cooperative, it is

unlikely they will produce results and they may actually make matters worse (especially if the

communications are sent before Trudeau is incarcerated). First, Trudeau argued at some length

that he has already sent more than a dozen letters of direction and emails to third parties

requesting information, see Trudeau Br. (DE766) (Oct. 11, 2013) at 13-14, but key Trudeau

associates (including his wife and his offshore asset protection planner, Michel van Roon) have

not responded with any material information. Second, even if these individuals ultimately

respond to Trudeau’s letters to secure his release, they are very unlikely to disclose any

information while Trudeau is not incarcerated. Worse, reminding them that Trudeau faces

continued legal pressure to disclose assets he controls may motivate Babenko, van Roon, and

others to take additional “asset protection” measures designed to make his wealth even more

difficult to locate.

D. Letters of Direction Cannot Resolve Unanswered Questions Concerning Transfers, Royalties, and Commissions, or Otherwise Purge the Contempt.

Responses to the letters are unlikely to address significant evidence that Trudeau has not

been forthcoming regarding his assets because—at best—the responses will present a materially

incomplete picture concerning where assets (including royalties, commissions, and transfers)

have gone. For instance, more than a month ago, Trudeau asked the Global Bank of Commerce

in Antigua to state whether he had an account there, and the bank confirmed that he did not. See

PXA:3. The issue, however, is that Babenko does have an account there, and GIN FDN (a

receivership entity) wired money to her Antigua account in August, twelve days after the Court’s

Receivership Order (and almost a month after the Court froze GIN FDN’s assets). See

Receiver’s Supp. Report (Sept. 16, 2013) (DE750-1) at 2. If he wanted to, Trudeau himself


5

almost certainly could explain this transaction now (and return the funds),5 but another letter to

the bank will not force him to do this.

To provide another example, less than two weeks ago, Trudeau argued that “no evidence

exists” that he received proceeds from infomercials, DE766 (Oct. 11, 2013) at 9, despite proof

that $4.3 million went to Trustar Productions,6 and despite evidence in the Receiver’s Report that

approximately $2.2 million went from Trustar to Trudeau directly.7 If he wants to, Trudeau can

give honest answers now about where these assets went, which would help Trudeau purge, but

letters of direction will not. Likewise, Trudeau claims that “he was not directly involved” in the

acquisition of a $700,0008 Kiev apartment, see DE766 (Oct. 11, 2013), despite considerable

evidence of his extremely direct involvement, see, e.g., PXA:7 (“I am keen on just paying off the

whole loan so natalie owns it outright with no mortgage as this is our ‘home’ in Ukraine”).9

Trudeau has not been forthcoming regarding this $700,000 apartment, and letters of direction

will not reveal what Trudeau knows about the transaction.

To provide one final example, Trudeau apparently has a royalty agreement of some sort

with Future Transactions Company, PXA:9, an entity owned by close associate Lee Kenny,

PX:10. Kenny assumed some of Sant’s responsibilities after Sant resigned, including the

5 Notably, notwithstanding the fact that the Receiver’s Supplemental Report discussed the

Antigua account, see Receiver’s Supp. Report (Sept. 16, 2013) (DE750-1) at 2, and the FTC emphasized it as well, see DE759 (Sept. 30, 2013) at 9, Trudeau’s most recent filing is conspicuously vague concerning the Antigua account. Trudeau simply asserts that he does not control it, and that he has disclosed everything he knows about it already. See DE766 (Oct. 11, 2013) at 9-10. Given the Court’s finding that Trudeau controls GIN FDN, see DE729 (July 26, 2013) at 1; DE713 (July 15, 2013) at 14-16 (proposed findings of fact), and the powerful evidence supporting that finding, Trudeau’s denial is extremely implausible.

6 See DE767-1 (Oct. 14, 2013) at 2. Trustar Productions is a receivership entity held by offshore KMT Fiduciary Trust, which the Court found that Trudeau controls. Id. at 2 n.1-2.

7 See PXA:4, Receiver’s Report, Ex. 3, Consolidated Statements of Balance Sheet (Sept. 6, 2013) (DE747-2) ($2,226,729.29 “due from” Trudeau to Trustar); PXA:5, Spreadsheet Provided by Receiver (detailing the $2,226,729.29; notably, the many round numbers suggest that these were not payments for alleged business expenses).

8 PXA:6 (email from Marc Lane to Neil Sant; “The appraised value as of April 23, 2010 was US $703,676.67”) (emphasis added).

9 See also PXA:8 at 1 (email from Lane to Trudeau; “KT, Here’s a communication from our counsel in Kiev, specifying the sums due and payment instructions.”) (emphasis added); DE767-1 (Oct. 14, 2013) at 7 n.14.


6

oversight of Trudeau’s effort to lobby the FTC, see PXB, W.P. Barlow Dec., and Future

Transactions made a payment to Marc Lane earlier this year, PXA:11 (wire from U.K.

account).10 Significantly, Trudeau sent a letter of direction to Kenny more than a month ago,

asking Kenny to provide the Receiver with “detailed information and documentation regarding

the Future Transaction Company[.]” PXA:12. To date, Kenny has not provided this

information, and there is no reason that another letter will move matters forward. Instead,

Trudeau himself must honestly disclose everything he knows regarding his relationship with

Future Transactions.

E. Responses to the Letters Will Not Make Trudeau’s Claims About Physical Assets Any Less Implausible.

Significantly, additional letters of direction will not resolve any of the issues associated

with gold bars and coins Trudeau controls (or the cufflinks). The problem is that Trudeau has

not provided candid and forthcoming answers regarding these assets, and letters of direction will

not help explain the substantial evidence that Trudeau controls these assets. For instance,

multiple filings11 have discussed $110,000 worth of gold coins purchased from Rosland Capital

with a check a Natural Cures employee obtained from a check drawn from a bank branch in Ojai.

See PXA:13 (invoice); PXA:14 (check).12 Although the invoice shows the coins were shipped to

Babenko at Trudeau’s Ojai address, the invoice also reflects the following account number:

“KT930.” PXA13 (emphasis added). According to Rosland Capital’s Compliance Officer, the

account number’s first two letters are the customer’s initials, and the second three numbers are

the customer’s zip code (Ojai’s zip code is 93023). See PXC. However, Trudeau contends “that

Natalia Babenko purchased and received the gold coins in 2008.” Tr. Br. (DE766) (Oct. 11,

10 Kenny worked with Trudeau for approximately twenty years. Kenny is based in the

United Kingdom and serves as GIN FDN’s “Executive Director.” See Receiver’s Report (Sept. 6, 2013) (DE747-1), Ex. 1. Babenko signed Kenny’s employment agreement on GIN FDN’s behalf, and “[t]he Receiver does not find it credible that Ms. Babenko signed this document without the direction of Mr. Trudeau.” Id. at 5.

11 See, e.g., FTC Statement, DE759 (Sept. 30, 2013) at 7. 12 As prior filings explained, Patrick Lee worked for Natural Cures, which Trudeau’s

offshore KMT Fiduciary Trust ultimately controlled. See FTC Statement (Sept. 30, 2013) (DE759) at 7 n.13.


7

2013) at 8. An honest explanation is necessary to resolve this issue, not a letter of direction that

will not reveal what Trudeau knows about physical assets the FTC has identified.

III. Conclusion

The FTC respectfully requests that the Court give consumers the best chance at prompt

redress by proceeding with its order imposing coercive sanctions until Trudeau satisfies the

established purge conditions. As the FTC has stated already, if the Court concludes that Trudeau

has honestly disclosed everything he knows concerning his assets, and thus can do nothing

further, then Trudeau should be immediately released.

Dated: October 21, 2013 David O’Toole ([email protected]) Federal Trade Commission 55 West Monroe Street, Suite 1825 Chicago, Illinois 60603-5001 Phone: (312) 960-5601 Fax: (312) 960-5600

Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Jonathan Cohen Michael Mora ([email protected]) Jonathan Cohen ([email protected]) Amanda B. Kostner ([email protected]) Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. M-8102B Washington, DC 20580 Phone: 202-326-3373; -2551; -2880 Fax: 202-326-2551


8

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jonathan Cohen, hereby certify that on October 21, 2013, I caused to be served true copies of the foregoing by electronic means, by filing such documents through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing System, which will send notification of such filing to: Kimball Richard Anderson [email protected] Thomas Lee Kirsch, II [email protected] Katherine E. Rohlf [email protected] Blair R. Zanzig [email protected]

/s/ Jonathan Cohen Jonathan Cohen ([email protected]) Attorney for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission




) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )


EXHIBITS RELATED TO FTC’S STATEMENT CONCERNING DEFENDANT’S LETTERS OF DIRECTION


FTC EXHIBIT A


FTC PXA:1



PXA:1 at 1



PXA:1 at 2


FTC PXA:2


PXA:23

PXA:2Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 774-2 Filed: 10/21/13 Page 9 of 60 PageID #:13835

PXA:23

PXA:2Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 774-2 Filed: 10/21/13 Page 10 of 60 PageID #:13836

FTC PXA:3



PXA:3 at 1



PXA:3 at 2



PXA:3 at 3


FTC PXA:4


Cas

e: 1

:03-

cv-0

3904

Doc

umen

t #: 7

47-2

File

d: 0

9/06

/13

Pag

e 14

of 4

5 P

ageI

D #

:132

27

PXA:4 at 1


Cas

e: 1

:03-

cv-0

3904

Doc

umen

t #: 7

47-2

File

d: 0

9/06

/13

Pag

e 15

of 4

5 P

ageI

D #

:132

28

PXA:4 at 2


Cas

e: 1

:03-

cv-0

3904

Doc

umen

t #: 7

47-2

File

d: 0

9/06

/13

Pag

e 16

of 4

5 P

ageI

D #

:132

29

PXA:4 at 3


FTC PXA:5


1:54 PM 10/18/13 Accrual Basis

Trustar Productions Inc. Transactions by Account

All Transactions

Type Date Num Adj Name Memo Class Clr Split Debit Credit Balance

Due From (New)

Kevin Trudeau

Bill 02/24/2006 Shop America USA Accounts Payable 100,000.00 100,000.00

General Journal 07/01/2007 PrePaid Royalty Expensed Royalty Expense 100,000.00 0.00

Bill 02/29/2008 Trudeau, Kevin Accounts Payable 110,000.00 110,000.00


Check 03/14/2008 2023 Trudeau, Kevin PNC Operating - 5128 260,000.00 470,000.00

Check 04/14/2008 2025 Trudeau, Kevin PNC Operating - 5128 100,000.00 570,000.00





Bill 05/16/2008 Trudeau, Kevin Accounts Payable 120,000.00 1,090,000.00





Check 07/26/2008 2043 Trudeau, Kevin PNC Operating - 5128 100,000.00 1,594,000.00











Check 06/14/2009 Discover Card - 4744 PNC Operating - 5128 247.00 2,347,247.00

Bill 07/30/2009 Discover Card - 4744 Accounts Payable 253.00 2,347,500.00

Bill 07/31/2009 Chase - 4688, 2945 Accounts Payable 556.59 2,348,056.59


Bill 08/01/2009 Bank of America - 0819/8024 Accounts Payable 1,200.00 2,349,546.59

Bill 08/02/2009 Bank of America - 0819/8024 Accounts Payable 545.76 2,350,092.35

Bill 08/13/2009 American Express - 81003 Accounts Payable 1,018.43 2,351,110.78

Bill 08/16/2009 American Express - 81003 Accounts Payable 17,350.51 2,368,461.29

Bill 08/27/2009 American Express - 81003 Accounts Payable 2,368,461.29

Bill 09/17/2009 Bank of America - 0819/8024 Accounts Payable 764.00 2,369,225.29


Bill 10/18/2009 American Express - 81003 Accounts Payable 2,369,479.29

Bill 11/08/2009 Chase - 4164 Accounts Payable 1,000.00 2,370,479.29

Bill 11/19/2009 Chase - 4164 Accounts Payable 2,370,479.29

General Journal 05/16/2012 KT-032812 Property provided to TruStar reducing the payable from KT on 3/28/12 peFixed Assets - Personal Propert 143,750.00 2,226,729.29

Total Kevin Trudeau 2,470,479.29 243,750.00 2,226,729.29

Total Due From (New) 2,470,479.29 243,750.00 2,226,729.29

TOTAL 2,470,479.29 243,750.00 2,226,729.29

Page 1 of 1PXA:5


FTC PXA:6


PXA:6 at 1


PXA:6 at 2


PXA:6 at 3


PXA:6 at 4


PXA:6 at 5


FTC PXA:7


PXA:7 at 1


PXA:7 at 2


PXA:7 at 3


FTC PXA:8


PXA:8 at 1


PXA:8 at 2


PXA:8 at 3


PXA:8 at 4


PXA:8 at 5


PXA:8 at 6


FTC PXA:9


PXA:9 at 1


PXA:9 at 2


FTC PXA:10


Summa

Accoun

Credit

RiskCharge

Directo

Structu

Docum

Feedba

COMPANY RISK REPORT

BUY NOW

FUTURE TRANSACTIONS COMPANY LIMITEDRegistered Address: Suite 2 Causey Hall, Dispensary Walk, Halifax, West Yorkshire, HX1 1QR

WATCH THIS COMPANY ADD TO DASHBOARD

Credit Status: Company Status:

Owner Verified: Not verified by director

►

LOG INSIGN UPAdvanced Search

Page 1 of 5FUTURE TRANSACTIONS COMPANY LIMITED. Free and instant access to Director ...

10/18/2013http://companycheck.co.uk/company/07937551/FUTURE-TRANSACTIONS-COMPAN...

PXA:10 at 1


Directors and Secretaries

Current directors and secretaries

Current Officer Name

Appointed Current Historical Total

Current Secretary Name

Appointed Current Historical Total

Values

Company Directors

Mr Lee Martin Kenny

Mr Paul Stanley Reid

Mr Lee Martin Kenny

Mr Paul Michael Tansey

Mr Stephen Paul McCreath

Jan '12 Mar '12 May '12 Jul '12 Sep '12 Nov '12 Jan '13 Mar '13 May '1

Mr Lee Martin Kenny

06-02-2012 6 3 9 BUY NOW

Mr Paul Stanley Reid

21-11-2012 1 0 1 BUY NOW

►




PXA:10 at 2


Previous directors and secretaries

Previous Director Name

Appointed Resigned Current Historical Total

Previous Secretary Name

Appointed Resigned Current Historical Total

Mr Stephen Paul McCreath

06-02-2012 09-07-2012 15 9 24 BUY NOW

Mr Lee Martin Kenny

06-02-2012 21-11-2012 0 1 1 BUY NOW

Mr Paul Michael Tansey

09-07-2012 21-11-2012 0 1 1 BUY NOW

No. of Employees

This business has not provided employee information.

Company Officers

Current directors and company secretary details are extracted from the latest Annual Return filed at Companies House, along with any amendments filed since the Return, including terminations, appointments,

►




PXA:10 at 3


HOME

SIGN UP

CONTACT US

ABOUT US

OUR API

ADVERTISE

HELP & FAQ

SEARCH

SEARCH HISTORY

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

LISTING POLICY

COOKIE POLICY

© COMPANY CHECK LTD 2013

3-5 College Street

Nottingham

NG1 5AQ

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

GOOGLE+

2.7k

changes in share holdings and share capital. View the Filing History for FUTURE TRANSACTIONS COMPANY LIMITED to review details of latest changes.

Employees

The total number of employess within a company are shown for each year where they have been provided. Only large full filing companies are required to file employee figures.

Need a little help? Try our list of FAQs or contact us. If you're a Pro customer, login to your dashboard and use the help section

for VIP priority support.

Like 3.5k

►




PXA:10 at 4


►




PXA:10 at 5


FTC PXA:11


PXA:11


FTC PXA:12



PXA:12


FTC PXA:13


PXA:7 at 1PXA:13


FTC PXA:14


PXA:7 at 2PXA:14


FTC PXA:15



PXA:15


FTC EXHIBIT B


PXB


FTC EXHIBIT C


PXC


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE...

Documents

Transcript of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE...