IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 · deployments of Acoustic Doppler Current...
Transcript of IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 · deployments of Acoustic Doppler Current...
D A Nolan / J D K Gardner-Hopkins Phone 64 4 499 9555 Fax 64 4 499 9556 PO Box 10-214 DX SX11189 Wellington
IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991
AND
IN THE MATTER of a Board of Inquiry appointed under section 149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider The New Zealand King Salmon Co. Limited's private plan change requests to the Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan and resource consent applications for marine farming at nine sites located in the Marlborough Sounds
SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENT OF FIGURES AND TABLES – FOR THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY BENJAMIN ROBERT KNIGHT IN RELATION TO
WATER COLUMN EFFECTS FOR THE NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON CO. LIMITED
JUNE 2012
Page 1 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 1. The nine salmon farm sites proposed in the current plan change application (red dots),
existing NZ King Salmon farm sites (black triangles) and one NZ King Salmon farm site
currently under appeal (open circle; Melville Cove, Port Gore).
Page 2 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 1. Relevant properties of each Sound used to estimate tidal residence times (= 12.43/24 x 2
x Volume of the region at low water spring (LWS)/Tidal Volume; Heath 1976) and critical
nutrient loading limits. * Tidal Range values shown are from Heath (1976) and calculated
independently for this study.
Surf.
area
Tidal range*
(m)
Tidal volume.
(106 m3)
Volume
of the
region
at LWS4
Euphotic
volume5
Tidal
residence
time (days)
Region (km2) Spring Neap Spring Neap (106 m3) (106 m3) Spring Neap
Pelorus Sound1 385 2.37 1.46 912 562 9200 5462 10.44 16.94
Inner QC Sound2 68 1.4 0.5 95 34 1747 1045 19.03 53.18
All QC Sound3 305 1.4 0.5 427 152 9100 4864 <23.27 <65.37
Port Gore6 48 2 0.5 96 24 961 772 10.36 33.32
1 Pelorus Sound is considered to be the region south of Paparoa and Culdaff Point, excluding the region east of Allen Strait. 2 Inner Queen Charlotte Sound is considered to be the region east of West Head and Dieffenbach Point, excluding the region east of Allen Strait. 3 Due to the two entrances of the outer region of Queen Charlotte (QC) Sound, the estimated tidal residence time is likely to be overestimated. 4 Volume has been calculated using charted data depth interpolated to an unstructured triangular mesh for all regions. 5 Euphotic volume is used for comparison to a critical nutrient loading rate (CNLR) and has been calculated using the lower of the depth to the seabed or a seasonally averaged euphotic depth (19 metres from Beatrix Bay, Pelorus Sound, Gibbs & Vant 19971). 6 Port Gore is considered to be the region south of a line between Cape Lambert to Cape Jackson, tidal ranges considered to be equivalent to Pelorus Sound. Tidal range data for this region are estimated based on outputs from the NIWA Tide Forecaster.
1 Gibbs MM, Vant WN 1997. Seasonal changes in factors controlling phytoplankton growth in Beatrix
Bay, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31 (2): 237-248.
Page 3 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 2. Water flow conditions and approximate depth beneath proposed farm sites. Current
speeds are depth-averaged values calculated from data collected during 30 day
deployments of Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs). HF = High Flow, LF = Low
Flow.
Site Flow Depth averaged
current speed (cm s-1) Depth (m)
Pelorus Sound
Kaitira (KAI) HF 19.5 60
Richmond Bay (RIC) HF 12.7 32 - 40
Taipipi (TAP) HF 14.5 62
Waitata Reach (WAT) HF 19.5 63
White Horse Rock (WHR) HF 11.9 30
Queen Charlotte Sound
Ngamahau (NGA) HF 22.3 23-35
Ruaomoko (RUO) HF 29.1 50
Kaitapeha (KAP) HF 10.4 60
Port Gore
Papatua (PAP) LF 3.7 35
Page 4 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 3. Relative magnitudes of existing nitrogen sources (finfish, riverine and oceanic) and sinks
(mussel harvests and denitrification) for the Pelorus Sound region. Note that loss of
nitrogen through burial or organic export is unknown. Q relates to the quantity or rate,
with the units expressed in the respective rows of the table.
Inputs
Quantity
or feeding
rate (Q)
kg N per Q
Total
nitrogen1
(tonnes
N/yr)
References
Waihinau Bay
(currently fallowed) 3 kt Feed/yr 56 + 168
Gowen & Bradbury
19872
Forsyth Bay 3 kt Feed/yr 56 + 168 Gowen & Bradbury
19872
Crail Bay (combined) 3 kt Feed/yr 56 + 168 Gowen & Bradbury
19872
Pelorus/Rai Rivers + 477 WRENZ 20103
Kaituna River + 83 WRENZ 20103
Manaroa + 9.0 WRENZ 20103
Tuna Bay + 6.3 WRENZ 20103
Crail Bay + 2.3 WRENZ 20103
Waitaria + 2.5 WRENZ 20103
Net oceanic exchange
(DIN) + 4200
Updated analysis of
NIWA data assuming
full tidal mixing and
exchange.
2 Gowen RJ, Bradbury NB 1987. The ecological impact of salmonid farming in coastal waters: a review.
Oceanography and Marine Biology 25: 563-575. 3 WRENZ 2010. NIWA Water Resource Explorer New Zealand, data retrieved from
http://wrenz.niwa.co.nz (November 2010).
Page 5 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 3. continued.
Inputs
Quantity
or feeding
rate (Q)
kg N per Q
Total
nitrogen1
(tonnes
N/yr)
References
Losses/Removals
Mussel farming N
removal 45 kt/yr 5.9 - 266
Zeldis 20084; MFA
2010
Denitrification 386 km2 1205 - 465
Kaspar et al. 19855;
Christensen et al.
20036
Nitrogen burial Unknown
1 Note that oceanic exchange estimates refer to DIN rather than total N.
4 Zeldis J 2008. Exploring the carrying capacity of the Firth of Thames for finfish farming: a nitrogen
mass-balance approach NIWA Client Report: CHC2008-02. 28 p. 5 Kaspar HF, Gillespie PA, Boyer IC, MacKenzie AL 1985. Effects of mussel aquaculture on the nitrogen
cycle and benthic communities in Kenepuru Sound, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. Marine Biology 85 (2): 127-136
6 Christensen PB, Glud RN, Dalsgaard T, Gillespie P 2003. Impacts of longline mussel farming on oxygen and nitrogen dynamics and biological communities of coastal sediments. Aquaculture 218 (1-4): 567-588.
Page 6 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 4. The relative magnitudes of existing nitrogen sources (finfish, riverine and oceanic) and
sinks (mussel harvests and denitrification) for the Queen Charlotte Sound region. Note
that several nitrogen inputs and exports, including major oceanic fluxes, are estimated for
this region based on a basic comparison to Pelorus Sound.
Inputs
Quantity or
feeding rate
(Q)
kg N
per
Q
Total
nitrogen
(tonnes
N/yr)
References
Te Pangu Bay1 5 kt Feed/yr 56 + 280 Gowen & Bradbury
19877
Otanerau Bay 3 kt Feed/yr 56 + 168 Gowen & Bradbury
19877
Ruakaka Bay 3 kt Feed/yr 56 + 168 Gowen & Bradbury
19877
Clay Point2 3.5 kt Feed/yr 56 + 196 Gowen & Bradbury
19877
Picton wastewater + 9 pers. estimate
Terrestrial Inputs + 16.6
pers. estimate based
on freshwater inputs
from Heath 19768
Net oceanic
exchange (DIN) + 1650
pers. estimate
assuming
comparable with
Pelorus Sound and
proportional to tidal
exchange volume3.
7 Gowen RJ, Bradbury NB 1987. The ecological impact of salmonid farming in coastal waters: a review.
Oceanography and Marine Biology 25: 563-575. 8 Heath RA 1976. Broad classification of New Zealand inlets with emphasis on residence times. New
Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 10 (3): 429–444.
Page 7 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 4. continued.
Inputs
Quantity or
feeding rate
(Q)
kg N
per
Q
Total
nitrogen
(tonnes
N/yr)
References
Losses/Removals
Nitrogen burial Unknown
Mussel farming N
removal
~2000 GWT
harvested 5.9 - 11.80
Zeldis 20089; MFA
201010
Denitrification 305 km2 1204 - 367
Kaspar et al. 198511;
Christensen et al.
200312
1. A consented staged increase of up to 6000 tonnes has been granted to the Te Pangu Bay Site. 2. A consented staged increase of up to 4000 tonnes has been granted to the Clay Point Site. 3. Queen Charlotte Sound is ~39% of the Pelorus Sound mean tidal exchange volume (Figure 1).
9 Zeldis J 2008. Exploring the carrying capacity of the Firth of Thames for finfish farming: a nitrogen
mass-balance approach NIWA Client Report: CHC2008-02. 28 p. 10 MFA 2010, Marine Farming Association Fact Sheet, retrieved from
http://www.nzmfa.co.nz/industryinfo.asp (November 2010) 11 Kaspar HF, Gillespie PA, Boyer IC, MacKenzie AL 1985. Effects of mussel aquaculture on the nitrogen
cycle and benthic communities in Kenepuru Sound, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. Marine Biology 85 (2): 127-136
12 Christensen PB, Glud RN, Dalsgaard T, Gillespie P 2003. Impacts of longline mussel farming on oxygen and nitrogen dynamics and biological communities of coastal sediments. Aquaculture 218 (1-4): 567-588.
Page 8 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 5. Table showing nitrogen waste calculations based on present feed used in the
assessment and possible low protein FCR combinations. Note the potential for large
reductions in DIN emissions, if protein content of feeds and/or the feed conversion ratio
(FCR) is able to be reduced in future.
Description Present
feed
Low
protein
Low
FCR
Low
protein
and FCR
FCR 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.5
Percentage protein in feed 45% 35% 45% 35%
Feed N
(kg/tonne of feed, 16% N in Protein
- Stead and Laird, 200213)
72 56 72 56
Fish N (kg retained/tonne of fish,
Bromley and Smart, 198114) 27.20 27.20 27.20 27.20
Feed N (kg/tonne of fish produced) 122.40 95.20 108.00 84.00
Lost TN (kg per tonne fish) 95.20 68.00 80.80 56.80
Lost TN (kg per tonne feed) 56.00 40.00 47.53 33.41
Faeces production
(kg/tonne fish, 26% - Butz & Vens-
Cappell, 198215)
442 442 390 390
N % in Feaces (Penczak et a.l
198216) 4% 4% 4% 4%
Faeces N lost (kg per tonne of fish) 17.68 17.68 15.6 15.6
DIN excretion (kg per tonne of fish
produced) 77.52 50.32 65.20 41.20
DIN excretion (kg per tonne of
feed) 45.60 29.60 43.47 27.47
% Reduction in DIN emissions
per fish production unit 35% 16% 47%
13 Stead SM, Laird LM 2002. Handbook of salmon farming. Springer Praxis, Chichester, UK. 14 Bromley PJ, Smart G 1981. The effects of the major food categories on growth, composition and food conversion in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson). Aquaculture 23 (1-4): 325-336. 15 Butz I, Vens-Cappell B 1982. Report of the FIFAC Workshop on Fish-Farm Effluents., Denmark. 113-121 p. 16 Penczak T, Galicka W, Molinski M, Kusto E, Zalewski M 1982. The enrichment of a mesotrophic lake by carbon, phosphorus and nitrogen from the cage aquaculture of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Journal of Applied Ecology 19 (2): 371-393.
Page 9 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 6. Typical water column characteristics for different trophic states, as summarised by Smith
et al. (1999)17 and based on the review by Håkanson (1994)18. TN= total nitrogen, TP=
total phosphorous, Chl= Chlorophyll-a (chl-a), SD= Secchi disc depth (a measure of water
clarity).
Trophic
state
TN
(mg/m3)
TP
(mg/m3)
Chl
(mg/m3)SD (m)
Oligotrophic <260 <10 <1 >6
Mesotrophic 260-350 10-30 1-3 3-6
Eutrophic 350-400 30-40 3-5 1.5-3
Hypertrophic >400 >40 >5 <1.5
17 Smith V, Tilman G, Nekola J 1999. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental pollution 100 (1-3): 179-196. 18 Håkanson L 1994. A Review on Effect Dose Sensitivity Models for Aquatic Ecosystems. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 79 (4): 621-667.
Page 10 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 7. Mean (Min-Max) dissolved and total nutrients and chlorophyll-a measured over the period
April 1984 to April 1985 from inner Pelorus Sound sites (Mills Bay/Schnapper Point) to
outer sites (Richmond Bay), data from Gibbs et al. (1992)19, and unpublished datasets.
Units are in mg/m3. Sound Station NO3-N NH4-N Urea DRP DIN
Queen
Charlotte Mills Bay
13.1
(0.5-39)
19.5
(0.3-59.3)
52.0
(3-102)
8.4
(3-15.7)
32.6
(3.8-83)
Schnapper
Point
25.6
(0.5-71)
17.6
(0.5-88)
50.4
(12-93)
8.8
(2-17.0)
43.2
(6 – 103)
Four Fathom
Bay
32.1
(3.4-78)
14.1
(0.3-85)
48.8
(2-105)
7.9
(2-20.1)
46.2
(3.9-132)
Crail Bay
18.5
(1.1-109)
15
(0.3-63)
52.4
(9-94)
8
(3-30.8)
33.5
(3.7-126)
Hallam Cove
23.6
(2.9-85)
12.3
(0.3-62.1)
48.3
(3-79)
8.3
(2-25.2)
35.9
(4.1-103)
Richmond Bay
30.8
(3.3-77)
11.9
(0.3-44.1)
51.8
(3-94)
8.3
(2-17.0)
42.7
(3.9-89)
Pelorus Tory Channel2
73
(37-111)
10
(3-26)
13
(4-17)
84
(40-128)
Wedge Point1
22.3
(0-79)
36.6
(3.6-36.5)
15.5
(6.6-24.7)
40.0
(<1 -150)
Station DON DOP TP TN Chl-a
Queen
Charlotte Mills Bay
52.3
(3-141)
4.2
(0.5-14.5)
19.0
(5.9-41.7)
167.4
(118-238)
1.97
(0.6-3.9)
Schnapper
Point
34.1
(3-221)
3.6
(0.5-15.0)
16.6
(4.7-29.1)
156
(87-227)
1.64
(0.4-6.0)
Four Fathom
Bay
39.3
(3-170)
3.7
(0.5-13.5)
16.6
(4.3-44.1)
159.3
(109-302)
1.47
(0.16-4.4)
Crail Bay
37.5
(4-187)
3.6
(0.5-13.6)
14.3
(4.9-39.9)
146.9
(96-264)
1.3
(0.48-2.9)
Hallam Cove
27.7
(4-113)
3.2
(0.5-12.5)
14.4
(4.7-36.4)
138.5
(94-248)
1.57
(0.43-4.7)
Richmond Bay
25.8
(2-72)
3.3
(0.5-8.2)
13.7
(7.1-26.6)
136.4
(90-197)
1.05
(0.13-2.8)
Pelorus Tory Channel2
21.1
(13-39)
174.9
(136-227)
1.44
(0.14-4.26)
Wedge Point2
22.4
(10-43)
155
(84-248)
1.95
(0.8 – 5.7) 1.Cawthron nutrient data at inner QC Sound (Wedge Point) for the years 1997 to 1999. 2. Chl-a concentrations are unpublished mean annual, depth-averaged data collected by NIWA for the period 2003-
2005; NO3-N, NH4-N, DRP, DIN, TP and TN concentrations are estimated from unpublished data provided by Marlborough District Council collected over the period 20/10/2011 to 17/1/2012 (see Figures 3 and 4 below).
19 Gibbs MM, Pickmere SE, Woods PH, Payne GW, James MR, Hickman RW, Illingworth J 1992. Nutrient and chlorophyll a variability at six stations associated with mussel farming in Pelorus Sound, 1984–85. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 26 (2): 197-211.
Page 11 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 2. Sites of recently collected unpublished data provided by the Marlborough District Council
(MDC) for Queen Charlotte Sound.
Page 12 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
0
2
4
6
8
10
DIN (m
mol m‐3)
QCS‐1
Surface
Deep
0
2
4
6
8
10
DIN (mmol m
‐3)
QCS‐2
Surface
Deep
0
2
4
6
8
10
DIN (m
mol m
‐3)
QCS‐3
Surface
Deep
0
2
4
6
8
10
DIN (m
mol m‐3)
QCS‐4
Surface
Deep
0
2
4
6
8
10
DIN (m
mol m
‐3)
QCS‐5
Surface
Deep
Figure 3. Time series of recently collected data for Queen Charlotte Sound for sites QCS 1 to 5
shown in Figure 3 above. With the exception of Tory Channel (QCS-3) all sites show
evidence of nitrogen limitation in the surface waters over the summer months.
Page 13 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 4. Two hydrodynamic model grids for the Pelorus and Queen Charlotte Sound regions
showing horizontal area of each element of the model expressed as log10(m2).
Figure 5. Depths used in both the Pelorus and Queen Charlotte hydrodynamic models. Note that
the scale has been truncated to 100 m to show detail within the inner sound regions,
areas shown as dark red in the map may be greater than 100 m.
Page 14 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 8. Yearly existing and total (existing + proposed) salmon farming nitrogen inputs for Port
Gore, Pelorus Sound and Queen Charlotte (QC) Sound. Nutrient loading rates are
expressed as a percentage of a critical nutrient loading rate (CNLR) of 6 mg N/m3/day.
Status Location
Euphotic
Volume
(106 m3)
Salmon
TN1
(Tonne/yr)
Salmon
DIN2
(Tonne/yr)
Net
‘natural’
N3
Total N4
(Tonne/yr)
NLR
(mg N/m3/day)
% of
CNLR
Existing
Pelorus
Sound 5462 504 410.4 4049 4553 2.28 38%
QC
Sound 4864 812 661.2 1271 2083 1.17 20%
Proposed
Pelorus
Sound 672 547.2
QC
Sound 420 342
Port
Gore 168 136.8
Total
Pelorus
Sound 5462 1176 957.6 4049 5225 2.62 44%
QC
Sound 4864 1232 1003.2 1271 2503 1.41 23%
Port
Gore 772 168 136.8 0 136 0.48 8%
1. Total N calculated at rate of 56 kg N/tonne feed (Table 5). 2. DIN calculated at a rate of 45.6 kg DIN/tonne feed (Table 5). 3. ‘Natural’ inputs is the net TN inputs from riverine and ocean sources less any denitrification or aquaculture
removals Pelorus Sound inputs estimated using the mean net tidal input estimate of DIN ocean inputs (see following Figure 9 and Appendix 1 of Water Column Assessment report). Queen Charlotte Sound nitrogen balance set at zero, assuming net oceanic and other inputs approximately match denitrification and aquaculture removal rates.
4. Total N is the sum of salmon and net ‘natural’ inputs.
Page 15 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1
Date (mmm-yy)
Fra
ctio
n o
f Me
an
A
nn
ual
Fe
edin
g R
ate
Figure 6. Mean feed loading variation by month for the 2010/2011 year at the Te Pangu and Clay
Point farms expressed as a fraction of their combined mean annual feeding rates.
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Concentration Difference (Outer - Inner, mgDIN/m3)
Mon
th
Figure 7. Distribution of weekly DIN concentration differences between Outer (i.e. Cook Strait
water) and Inner Pelorus Sound sorted by month for the period February 2007 to July
2010 (data provided by M. Gibbs, NIWA; n = 146). Positive concentrations indicate
coastal water is generally adding DIN into the Sound, but during winter (May to August) it
appears DIN is sometimes lost from the Sound. Blue boxes shown in this figure mark the
interquartile range, with the red vertical lines representing the medians of the data, blue
lines extend out to mark the shorter of 1.5 times the interquartile range or
minima/maxima.
Page 16 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 9. Original mean annual and updated “worst season” estimates for CNLR comparison of
both sounds. Note that seasonal estimates are presented as ‘per year’ equivalents to aid
comparison, although they will only apply to a three month period.
Scenario
Euphotic
volume
(106 m3)
Salmon TN
(Tonne/yr)
Ocean
inputs
only
+ River -
mussels -
denitrification
Net
‘natural’
N
NL
R
% of
CNLR
Worst Seasonal
Factor Increase 1.5 1.3
Original Pelorus
Annual Mean 5462 1176 4200 -151 4049 2.62 44%
Pelorus Worst
Season
(Nov-Jan)
5462 1764 5460 -151 5309 3.55 59%
Original QC
Annual Mean 4864 1148 1650 -379 1271 1.36 23%
QC Worst
Season
(Nov-Jan)
4864 1722 2145 -379 1766 1.96 33%
Original Port
Gore Annual
Mean
772 168 0 0 0 0.48 8%
Port Gore Worst
Season
(Nov-Jan)
772 252 0 0 0 0.72 12%
Page 17 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Table 10. Change in estimated increase in long-term steady-state nitrogen and chl-a concentrations
from existing background conditions within Pelorus, Queen Charlotte Sounds and Port
Gore under proposed initial feeding scenarios using a simple flushed aspatial model.
Note that more complex spatially explicit modelling suggests these results are
underestimated by between 50% to 90% of estimated long-term spatially explicit model
results, which suggests these results have limited use in the assessment.
Description Pelorus Queen
Charlotte
Port
Gore
Proposed feeding load increase (tonne/year) 12000 7500 3000
TN load per tonne of feed (kg/tonne feed) 56 56 56
Proposed N Load (tonne/yr) 672 420 168
Proposed N load (tonne/tide) 0.954 0.596 0.238
Mean tidal volume (106 m3) 737 289.5 290.5
TN conc. change (mg TN/m3) 1.294 2.059 0.821
Background TN concentration (mg N /m3) 150 160 150
Percent increase from background TN1 0.86% 1.29% 0.55%
N to chl-a ratio 0.114 0.114 0.114
Potential chl-a conc. increase (mg/m3)2 0.147 0.234 0.093
1. Assuming a mean annual sound-wide TN concentration before salmon farming from Pelorus Sound of 150 mg/m3
(Gibbs et al., 199220) and a mean of 160 mg TN/m3 for QC Sound based on unpublished DIN concentrations from Wedge Point and assuming a 4:1 TN:DIN ratio as observed in Pelorus Sound.
2 Realised changes in chl-a will only occur when phytoplankton biomass can become high naturally (e.g. autumn and spring bloom periods) so in order to put the results into context they should be compared to maximum observed chl-a concentrations in the regions (i.e. 6.0 mg chl-a/m3 Pelorus and 5.7 mg chl-a/m3 in Queen Charlotte Sound; Table 5)
20 Gibbs MM, Pickmere SE, Woods PH, Payne GW, James MR, Hickman RW, Illingworth J 1992. Nutrient and chlorophyll a variability at six stations associated with mussel farming in Pelorus Sound, 1984–85. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 26 (2): 197-211.
Page 18 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 8. Mean potential TN and chl-a concentrations from the proposed salmon farms under
recommended initial feeding limits (n=1424) for the surface (upper) and bottom (lower)
model layers in Pelorus Sound during the 30-day period 24 July to 23 August 2008
(model days 60 to 90). Note the largest value on the scale represents about 10% of the
mean annual TN concentration which will be composed of varying ratios of particulate
and dissolved forms of nitrogen.
Page 19 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 9. Mean potential TN and chl-a concentrations from the proposed salmon farms under
recommended initial feeding limits (n=1424) for the surface (upper) and bottom (lower)
model layers in Queen Charlotte Sound during the 30-day period 24 July to 23 August
2008 (model days 60 to 90). Note the largest value on the scale represents about 10% of
the mean annual TN concentration which will be composed of varying ratios of particulate
and dissolved forms of nitrogen.
Page 20 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 10. Mean potential TN and chl-a concentrations from the proposed salmon farms under
recommended initial feeding limits (n=1424) for the surface model layer in Port Gore
during the 30-day period 24 July to 23 August 2008 (model days 60 to 90). Note the
largest value on the scale represents about 20% of an estimated mean annual TN
concentration for the region which will be composed of varying ratios of particulate and
dissolved forms of nitrogen.
Page 21 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 11. Minimum (5th percentile, upper) and maximum (95th percentile, lower) potential TN and
chl-a concentration increases from the proposed salmon farms under recommended
initial feeding limits (n=1424) for the surface model layers in Pelorus Sound during the 30-
day period 24 July to 23 August 2008 (model days 60 to 90). Note the largest value on
the scale represents about 10% of the mean annual TN concentration which will be
composed of varying ratios of particulate and dissolved forms of nitrogen.
Page 22 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 12. Minimum (5th percentile, upper) and maximum (95th percentile, lower) potential TN and
chl-a concentration increases from the proposed salmon farms under recommended
initial feeding limits (n=1424) for the surface model layers in Queen Charlotte Sound
during the 30-day period, 24 July to 23 August 2008 (model days 60 to 90). Note the
largest value on the scale represents about 10% of the mean annual TN concentration
which will be composed of varying ratios of particulate and dissolved forms of nitrogen.
Page 23 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 13. Minimum (5th percentile, upper) and maximum (95th percentile, lower) potential TN and
chl-a concentration increases from the proposed salmon farms under recommended
initial feeding limits (n=1424) for the surface model layers in Port Gore during the 30-day
period, 24 July to 23 August 2008 (model days 60 to 90). Note the largest value on the
scale represents about 35% of the mean annual TN concentration which will be
composed of varying ratios of particulate and dissolved forms of nitrogen. White regions
shown in the upper figure indicate model cells that were dry for a period of time during the
model run.
Page 24 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 14. Mean potential TN and chl-a concentration increases from the proposed salmon farms
under a 50% elevated seasonal feeding scenario (n=1424) for the surface model layer in
Pelorus Sound during the 30-day period 24 July to 23 August 2008 (model days 60 to
90). Note the largest value on the scale represents about 10% of the mean annual TN
concentration and has been retained for comparative purposes, but may not show the
maximum concentrations close (<1 km) to the proposed sites.
Page 25 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 15. Mean potential TN and chl-a concentrations from the proposed salmon farms under a
50% elevated seasonal feeding scenario (n=1424) for the surface model layer in Queen
Charlotte Sound during the 30-day period 24 July to 23 August 2008 (model days 60 to
90). Note the largest value on the scale represents about 10% of the mean annual TN
concentration which will be composed of varying ratios of particulate and dissolved forms
of nitrogen.
Page 26 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 16. Mean potential TN and chl-a concentrations from the proposed salmon farms under a
50% elevated seasonal feeding scenario (n=1424) for the surface model layer in Port
Gore during the 30-day period 24 July to 23 August 2008 (model days 60 to 90). Note
the largest value on the scale represents about 33% of the mean annual TN
concentration which will be composed of varying ratios of particulate and dissolved forms
of nitrogen.
Page 27 of 27
Supplementary Document Of Figures And Tables – For The Evidence Provided In Relation To Water Column Effects Of Benjamin Robert Knight For The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited, June 2012
Figure 17. Flux and fate of feed nitrogen from the proposed salmon farms.
Table 11. Comparison of long-term retained load estimates from the flushed aspatial and spatial
model estimates, showing the aspatial model estimates were much (53% to 89%) lower
than spatial model estimates.
Region
Volume
of region
(106 m3)
Estimated flushed
aspatial
concentration
increase (mg TN/m3)
Aspatial
retained
load
(tonne TN)
Spatial
retained
load
(tonne TN)
% Difference
(1-Aspatial/Spatial)*100
Pelorus Sound 9200 1.294 11.90 89 87%
Queen Charlotte
Sound 9100 2.06 18.75 40 53%
Port Gore 961 0.821 0.79 7 89%