In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14...

15
1 Supporting information for In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid Macromonomers in Emulsion Polymerization Ingeborg Schreur-Piet a and Johan P.A. Heuts a * a Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected] Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Polymer Chemistry. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017

Transcript of In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14...

Page 1: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

1

Supporting information for

In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid Macromonomers in Emulsion Polymerization

Ingeborg Schreur-Pieta and Johan P.A. Heutsa*

a Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected]

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Polymer Chemistry.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017

Page 2: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

2

Characteristics of t-BMA and/or MAA macromonomers To characterize the macromonomers SEC, NMR and MALDI analysis have been performed. A short overview of the results are given below.

SEC In Fig. S1 Overview plot of the MMD of all three t-BMA macromonomers is given.

2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.00.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

log M

Fig. S1 Molar mass distribution of t-BMA-macromonomers MM16 (-); MM80(..) and MM350(-..) by SEC .

1H NMR The characteristic shifts in NMR are mentioned in Table S1.

Table S1 t-BMA and MAA macromonomers for NMR Shift (ppm) number H group t-BMA MM 0.9-2.6 1 H end group 9n CH3 of butyl acrylate group 3n CH3 on polymer backbone

2n CH2 on polymer backbone different shift for CH2 in macromonomer

5.4 - 6.1 2 CH2 cis-trans terminal C=C for t-BMA MM MAA-MM 0.9-2.6 1 H end group 3n CH3 on polymer backbone

2n CH2 on polymer backbone different shift for CH2 in macromonomer

5.6 - 6.2 2 CH2 cis-trans terminal C=C for MAA MM

11.0 1n H of acid group (only visible when protonated)

Calculation DPn from NMR

For the calculation of DPn for t-BMA macromonomer first a correction for rest monomer is made, by subtracting the intensity of the monomer H’s from the total intensity. The remaining NMR intensity is

Page 3: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

3

the intensity of the macromonomer end group (2 H) plus the intensity of the rest of the polymer (14n+11+1 H).

Itotal = 2+ (14 n + 12) = Iend + Irest DPn= n+1

A comparable calculation can be done for MAA macromonomer, the proton on the acid was not taken into account because the acid is deprotonated in methanol.

Itotal = 2+ (5 n + 3) = Iend + Irest DPn= n+1

In Fig. S2 an overlay the NMR spectra of t-BMA and MAA is shown. Clearly the absence of the intensity peak of the butyl acrylate group (1.4 ppm) after acidolysis of the polymer can be seen. The peak at 3.3 ppm is due to the solvent MeOD. In this case the water HDO peak (4.8 ppm) is suppressed, because it deformed the peaks of the macromonomer end group.

Fig. S2 1H NMR of t-BMA macromonomer (bottom) and of MAA macromonomeer (top)

In Fig. S3 to S5 the NMR spectra of the t-BMA macromonomer and the according MAA spectra are shown.

H

OO OO

n

Page 4: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

4

0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.50f1 (ppm)

-2

-1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1

1

1

1

14

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2t-BMA16 MM

145.

73

0.84

2.03

0.99

1.00

1.01

1.03

1.06

1.08

1.09

1.10

1.11

1.12

1.14

1.25

1.27

1.37

1.45

1.46

1.48

1.48

1.49

1.49

1.54

1.57

1.57

1.58

1.81

HDO

1.86

HDO

1.89

1.90

2.05

2.07

2.415.

435.

47

6.00

mon

omer

6.09

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.50f1 (ppm)

MAA16 MM

18.8

1

1.00

0.69

1.06

1.07

1.09

1.12

1.12

1.13

1.14

1.15

1.15

1.16

1.17

1.18

1.19

1.20

1.21

1.44

1.44

1.45

1.46

1.48

1.87

1.87

1.88

1.89

1.90

1.91

1.91

1.94

2.00

2.02

2.06

2.11

2.11

2.13

2.32

2.49

2.52

2.55

2.56

2.61

2.61

3.34

MeO

D

3.59

3.61

4.42

4.43

5.57

5.59

5.59

5.60

5.60

5.61

5.64

6.08

6.08

6.08

6.08

6.09

6.09

6.22

Fig. S3 1H NMR of t-BMA16-MM (left) and MAA16-MM (right).

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.50f1 (ppm)

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65t-BMA80 MM

1034

.12

4.12

6.32

8.41

0.99

1.03

1.07

1.08

1.11

1.14

1.25

1.49

1.50

1.52

1.60

1.61

1.63

1.66

1.81

1.86

1.89

1.89

1.89

1.90

1.93

2.06

2.35

tolu

ene

5.47

mon

omer

5.99

mon

omer

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.50

f1 (ppm)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500MAA80 MM

62.7

4

1.00

0.69

0.91

1.02

1.02

1.04

1.10

1.15

1.16

1.18

1.20

1.25

1.28

1.28

1.32

1.35

1.35

1.45

1.51

1.51

1.53

1.56

1.57

1.61

1.65

1.89

1.90

1.90

1.91

1.95

1.99

2.01

2.12

3.32

MeO

D

5.58

5.59

5.60

mon

omer

5.60

5.60

6.08

mon

omer

6.08

6.22

Fig. S4 1H NMR of t-BMA80-MM (left) and MAA80-MM with HDO suppression (right).

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.50f1 (ppm)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500t-BMA350 MM

98.79

1.85

1.75

0.99

1.03

1.11

1.14

1.66

1.66

1.80

1.89

1.89

1.89

2.05

5.42

5.46

mon

omer

5.99

mon

omer

6.08

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.50

f1 (ppm)

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

320

340

360MAA 350 MM

100.

00

0.20

0.08

0.00

1.16

1.22

1.32

1.34

1.45

1.51

1.53

1.56

1.65

1.96

2.00

2.12

3.32

5.57

5.60

mon

omer

6.08

mon

omer

6.22

Fig. S5 1H NMR of t-BMA350-MM (left) and MAA350-MM with HDO suppression (right).

Page 5: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

5

Batch emulsion polymerization of MMA with MAA80 and MAA360

In Fig. S6 the conversion time curves for the batch emulsion polymerizations with MM are given.

Fig. S6 Batch emulsion polymerization of MMA with 4 pphm macromonomer: (a) MAA16 and (b)

MAA350 with variable amounts of SDS. Concentration SDS: (■) 0.5 pphm; () 1 pphm and () 1.5 pphm.

Table S2 Particle diameters of pMMA latexes stabilized by SDS and 4 pphm MAA-MM.

SDS (pphm) Conversiona DLS

Dn (nm) PdI

MAA16 0.5 0.5 76 0.1

1.0 0.8 93 0.8

MAA80 0.5 0.6 78 0.1 1.0 0.8 77 0.1

MAA350 0.5 1.0 56 1.2 1.0 0.8 91 0.1

a Conversion latex DLS measurement

(a) (b)

Page 6: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

6

Semi-batch emulsion copolymerization of MMA and BA with MAA80

In Fig. S7 the conversion time curves for the semi-batch emulsion copolymerizations of MMA and BA are shown for different monomer feed compositions using 5 and 15 pphm of MAA80.

Fig. S7 Semi-batch copolymerization of BA and MMA with 5 and 15 phm MAA80, no SDS. wBA=1 (■); wBA=0.5 (); wBA=0.3 ();wBA=0.2 (); wBA=0.1 () and wBA=0.05 ().The dotted line indicates the addition profile of the semi-batch reaction. Crosses indicate major coagulation.

Page 7: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

7

Batch and semi-batch emulsion polymerization of BMA and EA with MAA80. In Fig. S8 and S9 the conversion time curves for emulsion polymerization of EA and BMA in batch and semi-batch processes with the particles size distributions are shown.

Fig. S8 Conversion time curve of the emulsion polymerization of ethyl acrylate with 5 pphm MAA80 in () batch and () semi-batch process and corresponding particle size distributions: batch (top) and semi-batch (bottom).

Fig. S9 Conversion time curve of the emulsion polymerization of butyl methacrylate with 5 pphm MAA80 in () batch and () semi-batch process, and corresponding particle size distributions.

Page 8: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

8

MALDI-ToF MS of MAA macromonomer In Fig. S10 the MALDI-ToF MS spectrum of MAA-macromonomer is shown. On top the measured spectrum; below a simulation with Na+ and K+, respectively, as cationating agent and on the bottom an overlay of all three graphs. Clearly can be seen that both Na+ and K+ ions are present, the intensity of the K+ signal, however, is always lower than of the Na+ signal.

Fig. S10 MALDI-ToF MS spectrum of MAA-macromonomer. (a) Measured spectrum; (b) simulation with Na+ = as cationating agent; (c) simulation with K+ = as cationating agent and (d) an overlay of all three graphs. Used end groups for calculation: H and a vinylic group.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Page 9: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

9

SEM, TEM and Cryo TEM images of p(BA-co-MMA) latexes with MAA80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p(BA-co-MMA) latexes with the corresponding particle

size distributions (PSD) as determined by DLS are given.

Fig. S11 SEM and Cryo TEM images respectively of BA latexes in batch process with 5 and 10 pphm MAA80

with corresponding PSD as obtained by DLS.

Page 10: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

10

Fig. S12 Cryo TEM and SEM images of BA latexes in semi-batch process with 5, 10 and 15 pphm MAA80 with corresponding PSD as obtained by DLS.

Page 11: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

11

Fig. S13 SEM and TEM image of BA-co-MMA latexes (wBA = 0.5) in semi-batch process with 5 and 10 pphm MAA80 with corresponding PSD as obtained by DLS.

Page 12: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

12

Fig. S14 TEM images of BA-co-MMA latexes (wBA = 0.3) in semi-batch process with 10 and 15 pphm MAA80

with corresponding PSD as obtained by DLS.

1 μm

0.5 μm

Page 13: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

13

MALDI–ToF MS of the initially formed oligomers in emulsion polymerization of BA with MAA80 Because of the use of THAP–DAC matrix-salt combination, both Na+ as K+ ions can be seen in the spectrum as cationating ion. The MALDI spectrum of MAA macromonomer (see Fig. S10) shows for this mass range always a larger peak with Na+ ions than with K+ ions, in Table S3 only Na+ peaks are mentioned, the mass of K+ is 38.9637, which gives a m/z of +15.9739. The end groups used in the calculations are hydrogen, sulfate, hydroxyl, and a vinylic end group of MAA. No end groups from the dissociation of AIBN were taken into account in the MALDI spectrum, because the MALDI spectrum of MAA macromonomer shows only a hydrogen end group. In Scheme S1 possible pathways to potential end products are given. With this scheme in hand the peaks from the MALDI spectrum of the initially formed products were identified. The measured and calculated m/z values are shown in Table S3. Most of the measured oligomers are graft (or block) copolymers (6) of MAA and BA; in rare cases also macromonomers (thus terminated with H and vinyl group) (5) were formed. Still some of the unreacted macromonomer (1) seems to be present, although it should be noted that the m/z of this structure is the same as that of copolymer structure 6. We also observe a small number of peaks from the termination by recombination reaction of two smaller pMAA radicals (1T). The intermediate reaction product of a growing pBA chain with one MAA macromonomer (3) was observed with an OH end group. The OH group comes from the decomposition of the persulphate initiator. Structure 5 is a macromonomer of BA and MAA, and is a special form of 6. In the MAA chain also an exchange of one or more H+ with Na+ can occur, this will give a rise in m/z of 21.9820, indicated with *.

H

COO COO

x

R

COO COOBu

x

COOBu

y-1

BA

H

COO COO

x-1

R

COOBu

v

COO

yBuOOC

R

COO COOBu

x

COO

y

2

1

R

COOBu

v

COO

yCOO

BuOOC

z

COOBu COOBu

COO

RxHx

BA+

=

SO4

Possible end products

R

COOBu

v

COO

yCOO

BuOOC

z'

COOBu

R1

Hx

COOBu COO

y'

3

5

R2

R

COOBu

y'

4 6

R

COOBu

v

COO

yBuOOC

z'

COOBu

Hx

R2

COO

Scheme S1 Possible pathways for in situ formation of amphiphilic copolymers, R = H, OH or SO4-; R1 = H, OH, SO4

-,

MAAC=C, R2 = OH or SO4-; y ≥ 1.

Page 14: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

14

Table S3 Elaboration of a part of the MALDI-TOF-MS spectrum of oligomers at start of semi-batch emulsion

polymerization of BA with 15 pphm MAA80 as stabilizer. T= 60 °C, 350 rpm, 0.25 pphm KPS.

m/z Typea Number monomer units

End group

measured calculatedc # xb yb MAAC=C H OH SO4

1055.2 1055.4 1055.5

1 6

11 9

0 2

1

1 2

1057.1 1057.4 1T 12 0 2

1060.7

1060.5 5 4 4 1 1

1077.1 1077.4 1077.5

1*

6* 11 9

0 2

1

1 2

1079.2 1079.4 1T 12 0 2

1099.1 1099.5 6 11 1 2

1101.0 1101.4 1T* 12 0 2

1121.4 1121.5 6* 11 1 2

1141.2 1141.5 1141.5

1 6

12 10

0 2

1

1 2

1143.1 1143.5 1T 13 0 2

1149.2 1149.7 3 0 8 1 1

1163.1 1163.5 1163.5

1*

6* 12 10

0 2

1

1 2

1177.5 1177.7 5 2 7 1 1 1185.1 1185.5 6 12 1 2

1207.1 1207.5 6* 12 1 2

1227.1 1227.5 1227.6

1 6

13 11

0 2

1

1 2

1229.1 1229.5 1T 14 0 2

1249.1 1249.5 1249.5

1*

6* 13 11

0 2

1

1 2

1251.1 1251.5 1T 14 0 2

1271.1 1271.6 6 13 1 2

1272.1 1272.6 5 2 7 1 1

1293.1 1293.5 6* 13 1 2

1313.2 1313.5 1313.6

1 6

14 12

0 2

1

1 2

a Structure according to scheme S1. b x = total number of MAA units and y = total number of BA units. c Molar masses used for calculations in g/mol: BA=128.0838; MAA=86.0368; MAAC=C=85.0290; Na+=22.9898; H=1.0078; SO4

-=95.9517; OH-=17.0027. Na+ is applied as cationating agent. * Exchange of 1 H+ with 1 Na+ in the pMAA chain; 1T terminated PMAA chain by recombination. Accuracy for m/z of the mass analyzer after calibration is ca. + 0.5.

Page 15: In Situ Stabilizer Formation from Methacrylic Acid ...-MMA) latexes with MAA 80 In Fig. S11 to S14 the SEM or (Cryo)TEM images of p( BA-co-MMA) latexes with t he corresponding particle

15