Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

14
Improving Student Performance with Daylighting Straub Hall, University of Oregon

description

By Energy Studies in Buildings LaboratoryPresented to Shanghai Xian Dai Architects at the University of Oregon

Transcript of Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Page 1: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Improving Student Performance with DaylightingStraub Hall, University of Oregon

Page 2: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Why focus on daylighting?

_Daylighting can increase learning and test performance by 20-26% _Glare reduces performance by 15% _Daylit classrooms reduce absenteeism _Daylighting reduces energy use

Page 3: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How much energy can be saved?

_Electric lighting accounts for 20% of all building energy usage _Lower required light levels need less glazing

© 2007, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Annual lighting energy saved during daylight hours in Portland, OR with a 5% minimum dimming ballast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%

Daylight factor

Per

cent

lighti

ng e

ner

gy s

avin

gs

5fc

10fc

20fc

30fc

50fc

© 2007, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Annual lighting energy saved during daylight hours in Portland, OR with a 5% minimum dimming ballast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%

Daylight factor

Per

cent

lighti

ng e

ner

gy s

avin

gs

5fc

10fc

20fc

30fc

50fc

© 2007, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Annual lighting energy saved during daylight hours in Portland, OR with a 5% minimum dimming ballast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%

Daylight factor

Per

cent

lighti

ng e

ner

gy s

avin

gs

5fc

10fc

20fc

30fc

50fc

More Windows

Mor

e En

ergy

Sav

ings

Page 4: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Straub Hall

Page 5: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

What was the initial design?

_Large skylights _View windows to the south and north _Clerestory to the east _Deep acoustic clouds _No light under mezzanine

North

Page 6: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How to test the daylighting?

_TheArtificialSkyisamirrorbox that simulates overcast sky conditions _Photometric sensors are placed inside of a scale model to determine daylight intensity and distribution in a space _Interiorsurfacereflectancesare simulated with papers of similar reflectances

interior light levelexteriorlightlevel

=Daylight Factor (DF)

interior sensors

exteriorsensor

Page 7: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 0-1Daylight Factor

5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2

Section

© 2013 Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Straub Hall - Lecture HallDaylighting Analysis

2 Linear SkylightsTotal Skylight Area: 500 sf

Iteration #1

_Large skylights creating “hot spots” _Too much light on screen _Deep lightwells reduces daylight _Adequate daylight

Presentation Board

Page 8: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 0-1Daylight Factor

Section

© 2013 Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Straub Hall - Lecture HallDaylighting Analysis

2 Linear SkylightsTotal Skylight Area: 500 sf

Iteration #2

_Small skylights reduce “hot spots” _Screen is adequately darkened _Deep lightwells reduce daylight _Front seats are too dark

Presentation Board

Page 9: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 0-1Daylight Factor

Iteration #3

_Small skylights reduce “hot spots” _Screen is slightly too bright _Shallow lightwells increase daylight _Adequate daylight in all seating

Presentation Board

Page 10: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 0-1Daylight Factor

Iteration #4

_Small skylights reduce “hot spots” _Screen is adequately darkened _Shallow lightwells increase daylight _Adequate daylight in all seating

Presentation Board

Page 11: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How to control the daylight levels?

_Different space uses require different lighting levels _Daylight levels vary with seasonal and daily climate

_Adaptable shading is required!

Page 12: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How to adapt the shading?

_Louvers are integrated into the skylights to instantaneously adjust to maintain light levels _Automated cloth shades on vertical glazing block daylight while retaining views out _Daylight sensors adjust electric lighting levels under mezzanine to match the daylight levels in the rest of space

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 100% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

WINTER SUMMER

Figure 2: Current Visible Transmission (Vt_vertical=75%, Vt_skylight=52%)

Average: 1.6 fc

Average: 1.4 fc

Max: 0.3 fc

Average: 3.0 fc

Average: 1.5 fc

Max: 0.5 fc

Average: 8.5 fc

Average: 3.2 fc

Max: 5.0 fc

Average: 6.3 fc

Average: 6.0 fc

Max: 1.6 fc

Values represent overcast conditions only

15752:da Copyright 2013, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Middle & Front Skylights: 50% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 0% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 100% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 67% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 100% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

FEAT

UR

E PR

ESEN

TATI

ON

S (1

FC

)AV

WIT

H N

OTE

TA

KIN

G (5

FC

)

Page 13: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 100% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

WINTER SUMMER

Figure 2: Current Visible Transmission (Vt_vertical=75%, Vt_skylight=52%)

Average: 1.6 fc

Average: 1.4 fc

Max: 0.3 fc

Average: 3.0 fc

Average: 1.5 fc

Max: 0.5 fc

Average: 8.5 fc

Average: 3.2 fc

Max: 5.0 fc

Average: 6.3 fc

Average: 6.0 fc

Max: 1.6 fc

Values represent overcast conditions only

15752:da Copyright 2013, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Middle & Front Skylights: 50% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 0% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 100% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 67% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 100% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

FEAT

UR

E PR

ESEN

TATI

ON

S (1

FC

)AV

WIT

H N

OTE

TA

KIN

G (5

FC

)How much shading is needed? _The vertical glazing contributes daylight differently than the skylights, so the vertical glazing is shaded differently than the skylights

Page 14: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

A better space for learning?