IMPROVING INTERMEDIATE LITERACY

Professional Development Facilitator’s Guide

Recommendation 3: Provide opportunities for extended discussion of text meaning and interpretation.

Materials Checklist…………………………………………………………………………2

SDE Introduction/ Background………………………………………………………3

Presenter’s Facilitation Script………………………………………………………….4-34

Handouts……………………………………………………………………………………….34

Background Resources for Facilitator………………………………………………35-43

References………………………………………………………………………………………44

Materials checklist and notes:

Item Consumable Y or N

Quantity Notes:

Computer

Projector

Clicker

Power Point Presentation on USB or Computer

Handouts

Chart paper & pens

Sticky notes

Agenda

Sign In forms

Evaluation form

Articles to be read

Etc.

About the guide This guide was developed as a model for intermediate schools teaching children in grades 4-8. It is offered as a complete training resource for evidence-based practices that support literacy in fourth through eighth grade. Designed to support instructional leaders to deliver effective training to teachers, this guide provides nine evidence-based strategies with practical application ideas and examples, as well as resources for immediate implementation with children and in classrooms. The components in this guide are derived from the Institute for Educational Sciences (IES): Improving Adolescent Literacy, which includes a collection of “best available evidence” related to specific topics. More information can be found on the IES website: www.ies.ed.gov. Both the guide and presentation materials were compiled by the Northwest Comprehensive Center at Education Northwest for the Idaho State Department of Education. How to use the guide This guide is designed to accompany the training provided to an instructional leader (coach, teacher, administrator) who works with and supports teachers to utilize evidence-based strategies to improve outcomes for intermediate children in grades 4-8. The instructional leader will be trained to facilitate and lead learning in a school and/or district setting. The facilitator’s guide includes a pre-formatted slide presentation with an associated script. Materials for use by the trained facilitator also include handouts and additional web-based resources to share with teachers. The design of the guide provides flexibility to facilitators to respond to school or district needs in a targeted manner. Each evidence-based practice can be provided as brief training sessions over the course of a school year. These recommendations can be grouped into common threads and presented or provided as a full or half day professional development session. The practices introduced and subsequent activities are not content-specific and support improving literacy across content areas in grades 4-8. What participants need to bring The participants attending this professional learning session should bring their core instructional materials, teacher manuals, textbooks, and/or grade level standards. Throughout the session, they will be asked to reference and make connections to the instructional tools (core instructional materials) they are currently using.

Presenter’s Facilitation Agenda: Outcomes (post on chart paper)

• Understand how extended discussion improves comprehension • Observe (by watching a video) how a teacher facilitates discussions; discuss instructional strategies for facilitation • Describe two or more formats that will facilitate extended discussions • Practice a discussion protocol and apply it to current core instructional materials

Engagement Structures

• Structured Partners (group of 2 at table) • Table Groups • Pairs-to-Square (two partner pairs come together to create group of 4) • Discussion Placemat (from Discussion module—will be used as engagement and discussion structure in this

module) • Talking Chips • Additional embedded engagement strategies--quick writes, weighty words, inside-outside circle, cold call, whip

around

Slides Time Suggested Script

1

5 min. Welcome (Introduce yourself, colleagues, and participants. Establish structured partners and have partners identify whether they will be a 1 or a 2 during partner work.) Today’s presentation on Literacy for Intermediate Learners was developed in partnership with the Idaho State Department of Education and the Northwest Comprehensive Center at Education Northwest, a nonprofit organization. The goal of this workshop is to share evidence-based recommendations for improving intermediate literacy. It is designed to provide the research and practical ideas for meeting the needs of all students, including struggling readers across content areas. We have four outcomes for today (point to

chart paper.) By the end of this training, you will be able to:

• Understand how extended discussion improves comprehension • Observe (by watching a video) how a teacher facilitates discussions;

discuss instructional strategies for facilitation • Describe two or more formats that will facilitate extended discussions • Practice a discussion protocol and apply it to current core

instructional materials

Our shared goal is to provide support for Idaho educators, as together we are challenged with equipping fourth through eighth grade children with literacy skills, so these children can competently meet the college- and career-ready expectations they will be facing in just a few more years.

2

3 min. Quote Take a minute to read and reflect on this quote (Allow think time). What does this make you think about as a fourth-eighth grade teacher? (Allow people to share their thoughts.) What implications does this have for you and for your students? (Ask people to share out their thoughts.) Every day and in every classroom in Idaho, teachers and students are using texts to communicate through speaking, listening, writing, and reading. We are preparing our students for a world of informational texts. This presentation has been prepared for ALL of you here today. The ability to read critically is the one common factor in all content areas. Whether you teach math, science, social studies, English, or technology, we ALL teach literacy.

3

The literacy challenge is real for students, teachers, parents… all of us here. In 2019 the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP, was administered at schools across the nation. The 2019 report card shows that fourth and eighth graders in most states across the nation have stalled or declined in reading proficiency during the last decade. A full two-thirds of students did not score proficient in reading on the most recent test. One third of the nation's fourth-graders tested "below basic." In Idaho, 34% scored at or above proficient in fourth grade and 37% scored at or above proficient in eighth grade reading. Both of these scores were above the national average. Further, across the board, Idaho is in the top 15 in the national rankings. However, the eight-grade reading score decreased by four points in 2019—a statistically significant drop. Students considered proficient or advanced by NAEP standards possess the academic literacy skills necessary for school success. The national statistics demonstrate that many students leave middle school unable to read adequately and are, therefore, unprepared to learn from textbooks at the high school level and beyond. According to Jeanne Chall’s stages of reading development (1996), in grades 4 and above, students move from the learning-to-read stage to the reading-to-learn stage. It is during this stage that students read increasingly more demanding academic texts containing challenging words and complex concepts beyond their oral vocabularies and knowledge base. In the critical transition period from learning to read to reading to learn, we often see a drop-off in reading scores, particularly for socioeconomically disadvantaged students.

4

Educators who work with students in grades 4-8 know that, unfortunately, not all children learn to read by the time they leave elementary school. In fact, 1 in 4 children in America grow up without learning how to read. How does this affect content area learning? What does that do for their future? Statistically, 2/3 of students who cannot read proficiently by the end of 4th grade end up in jail or on welfare.

5

(Read slide aloud.) What is happening from elementary to junior high? What are you doing at your school to improve the 20%? How are you supporting the students who have failed year after year to read and comprehend at grade level? How might this affect motivation? (Structured partner share) A few ideas from schools trying to address this issue include:

● Librarians knowing students Lexile levels and guiding them towards appropriate books

● Intervention classes targeted to students’ core deficits in reading—not simply blanket intervention programs that may or may not address specific student needs

● Reading clubs where students sign up for books to read ● Grade level novels with audible for students who need additional

support ● Strong Tier 1 instruction that meets the needs of all students, not just

those on grade level ● Etc.

6

“Learning to read is critical to a child’s overall well-being. If a youngster does not learn to read in a literacy-driven society, hope for a fulfilling, productive life diminishes.” G. Reid Lyon, former Chief of the Child Development and Behavior Branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Although students who fall behind rarely catch up without intensive intervention, research has demonstrated that secondary-level students can make significant gains with proper instruction. Evidence also suggests that struggling middle school readers can improve their reading skills when there is adequate time for instruction and research-validated instructional practices are implemented.

7

Did you know that there also is a close connection between illiteracy (reading on or below 4th grade) and crime? (Read quote on slide.)

8

Let’s read this quote in unison. Ready? “Learning to read…” Do you agree or disagree with this quote? (Thumbs up/Thumbs down). Why? (Discuss.) (Then, before moving onto slide 9, quickly have participants synthesize the information on slides 3-8 addressing effects of illiteracy with the activity below.) Write the following question on a sticky note: Why focus on improving literacy instruction in ALL content areas? Get out your Conversation Placemat and turn to your structured partner.

Our key question is written on your sticky note. This is what is in the circle of the placemat. We are now going to use the Conversation Placemat “Supporting Ideas with Examples,” the box located on the top right-hand side of the placement.

1. Partner 1 will pose the question from the sticky note, but reword using one of the question prompts in the Supporting Ideas with Examples, Prompting section. For example, if I was partner 1, I could say, “Can you give me an example from the information introduced thus far why we need to focus on improving literacy instruction in ALL content areas?”

2. Partner 2 would respond using one of the sentence starters from the responding section of the placement, citing a fact from slides 3-8.

3. Then, partners switch roles--Partner 2 then asks the question using a prompt and Partner 1 responds using a sentence starter.

9

When we think about improving literacy instruction, nothing will replace an effective teacher. (Direct participants to write 20x on a sticky note.) The teacher is the most important factor in student learning. A teacher is 20x more powerful than any other intervention. And yet it is also true that there is more variance from classroom to classroom than there is from school to school or district to district.

10

(Read the quote aloud.) As we previously discussed, the ability to read critically is the one common factor in all content areas. Whether you teach math, science, social studies, or technology, we ALL must provide good literacy instruction to ensure students have the skills and strategies necessary to be successful in school and beyond. Our goal today is to provide some specific tools for improving literacy

instruction in grades 4-8. You were asked to bring some teaching materials, such as core instructional materials, teacher manuals, textbooks, lesson plans, and/or grade level standards, so you can apply new tools for improving literacy during today’s session.

11

Recognizing the value of consistent, real-world learning goals to ensure all students are graduating high school prepared for college, career, and life, our state adopted Idaho Content Standards in 2011. (Pull up standards on the website and show where the literacy standards are and where their content standards are located.) Although labeled on the SDE website as English Language Arts/Literacy, these standards provide a framework for literacy not only in English Language Arts, but across content areas in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Today’s information on improving intermediate literacy fits into Idaho’s English Language Arts (ELA)/Literacy Standards (Reading: Literature, Reading: Informational text, and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.) Standards and curriculum work together to guide teachers in understanding what students should know and be able to do. Idaho has adopted not only these ELA/Literacy standards, but also content standards for various disciplines, such as history, science, health, the arts, etc. The content standards for a specific content area or discipline provide guidance on the WHAT—what content teachers should. In contrast, the ELA/Literacy standards for literacy in history, social studies, science, and technical subjects provide the HOW—such as how teachers can use reading, speaking, listening, and speaking to help students access and learn the content. Content teachers are not expected to be reading teachers—but they are responsible for using their content area expertise to help students meet the challenges of reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language in their

respective fields. The Idaho State Department of Education (SDE) website provides a link to the Standards by grade level, and that link is listed in the references.

12

The Idaho Standards incorporates three key shifts in ELA, history/social studies, science, and technical subjects:

1. Regular practice with complex texts and their academic language

Rather than focusing solely on the skills of reading and writing, the ELA/literacy standards highlight the growing complexity of the texts students must read to be ready for the demands of college, career, and life. The standards call for a staircase of increasing complexity so that all students are ready for the demands of college- and career-level reading no later than the end of high school. The standards also outline a progressive development of reading comprehension so that students advancing through the grades are able to gain more from what they read.

Closely related to text complexity and inextricably connected to reading comprehension is a focus on academic vocabulary: words that appear in a variety of content areas (such as ignite and commit). The standards call for students to grow their vocabularies through a mix of conversation, direct instruction, and reading.

2. Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence from texts, both literary and informational

The Common Core emphasizes using evidence from texts to present careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information. Rather than asking students questions they can answer solely from their prior knowledge and experience, the standards call for students to answer questions that

depend on their having read the texts with care.

The reading standards focus on students’ ability to read carefully and grasp information, arguments, ideas, and details based on evidence in the text. Students should be able to answer a range of text-dependent questions, whose answers require inferences based on careful attention to the text.

3. Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction

Students must be immersed in information about the world around them if they are to develop the strong general knowledge and vocabulary they need to become successful readers and be prepared for college, career, and life. Informational texts play an important part in building students’ content knowledge. Further, it is vital for students to have extensive opportunities to build knowledge through texts so they can learn independently.

13

Here are two example standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects, grades 4-8.

14

There is also another great resource, Vertically Aligned Standards, on the SDE website called the URL to that resource is listed in the references.

15

Here is an example from the vertical alignment in grades 4-8. What do you notice about word progression at each grade level? (Discuss and share out.) Think about how you might use the vertical aligned standards document when planning lessons. Any ideas? (Wait time and sharing.) Again, these Standards broadly reflect the research on improving adolescent literacy. Now, let’s dive into today’s session on how explicit vocabulary instruction improves intermediate literacy!

16

One of our goals as teachers is to develop skilled readers, so that students are fully prepared for the rigor of college or a career. What are some essential components of being a successful/skilled reader? Think about someone you would consider a skilled reader and describe how they think and what they can do. (Have participants turn and talk with a partner. Then have them share out as you generate a mind map to display background schema.)

Scarborough’s Rope: Let’s consider two essential components represented in this illustration by Hollis Scarborough (2002), Language Comprehension and Word Recognition. In her illustration, the twisting ropes represent the underlying skills and elements that come together to form two necessary braids that represent the two essential components of skilled reading. Examination of Scarborough’s rope reveals how multifaceted each is.

17 For either of the two essential components to develop successfully, children need to be taught the elements necessary for automatic word recognition (i.e., phonological awareness, decoding, sight recognition of frequent/familiar words), and strategic language comprehension (i.e., background knowledge, vocabulary, verbal reasoning, literacy knowledge). Word recognition is developed through intentional, systematic, and explicit instruction in the structure of the English language, such as phonics. Language comprehension is developed in a variety of ways through exposure to ideas, conversation, teacher read alouds, student to student dialogue, and more. In other words, to unlock comprehension of text, two keys are required — being able to read the words on the page and understanding what the words and language mean within the texts that children are reading (Davis, 2006). Facilitator’s note: A more elaborate explanation of the rope can be found under the resources section of this guide. This resource is only for the facilitator to provide more detailed information on Scarborough’s Rope.

18

The Simple View of Reading (SVR) (Gough & Tunmer, 1986) Using the concepts of Scarborough’s Rope, which draw on the research-supported representation of how reading comprehension develops, this Simple View chart characterizes skillful reading comprehension as the combination of those two separate, but equally important, components: word recognition skills and language comprehension ability. So, we know that we need to account for language comprehension and word recognition. Gough and colleagues present this SVR in a mathematical algorithm: WR X LC = C. WR refers to word level reading and LC refers to the ability to understand spoken (oral) language. It is simple multiplication problem—if one element is low, it affects the final outcome. Just as Scarborough’s Rope illustrates, if any of these pieces are missing, it affects the end result—comprehension. How can this help us get more targeted with our instruction and intervention?

Vocabulary Instruction | 18

Simple View of Reading (SVR)

Adequate WR

Adequate LC

Poor WR

Adequate LC

Adequate WR

Poor LC

Poor WR

Poor LC

WR: Word Recognition (phonological awareness,

decoding, and encoding skills

LC: Language

Comprehension (skills related

to language comprehension)

1

3

2

4

WR x LC = C

Word Reading Strong Poor

La

ngu

ag

e C

om

pre

he

nsio

n

Str

on

g

P

oo

r

1 X 1 = 1 0 X 1 = 0 1 X 0 = 0

Using the SVR, we can think about four basic profiles of readers: (Box 1) Look at Box 1. These readers may have adequate word recognition and language comprehension. We hope that all our readers are at least adequate in the two components. And wouldn’t it be great if they were really good in both components? (Box 2) Look at Box 2. These readers may have poor word recognition and adequate language comprehension, which results in poor reading comprehension. In other words, when the text is read orally to them, these learners can engage in making adequate inferences and answering the kinds of questions that demonstrate an understanding of the text. (Box 3) Look at Box 3. These readers may have adequate word recognition and poor language comprehension, which results in poor reading comprehension. Some English learners (ELs) fall into this category, especially if their first language shares an alphabetic sound system, such as Spanish. Native speakers of English who fall into the category are sometimes referred to as “word callers”. They can read every word but cannot understand the text. Another more technical term is hyperlexic. This is similar to when you learn to read a foreign language, such as Italian, and can pronounce the words and sentences, but can’t track the meaning due to poor vocabulary knowledge or misunderstanding the grammar and syntax. (Box 4) Now look at box 4. These readers may have poor word recognition and poor language comprehension, which results in poor reading comprehension. If a student has poor word recognition, you will need to assess language comprehension using read alouds, or something similar, to determine if they also struggle with language comprehension. Our task is to find out why a reader is having difficulties. We want to find each reader’s strengths and capitalize on those strengths. Likewise, we want

to find each reader’s weaknesses and intervene on those weaknesses. Again, Box 1 is the goal, because we know that children who have success with reading comprehension are those who are skilled in both word recognition and language comprehension. This is a big concept. Let’s take a moment to synthesize the information learned on this slide. Take out your Conversation Placement. This time, we will use the box labeled “Synthesize Conversation Points” located on the bottom center of the placement.

1. Partner 1 will prompt with a question listed in the prompting section. For example, if I was partner 1, I could say, “What key ideas can we take away?”

2. Partner 2 would respond using one of the sentence starters from the responding section of the placement, citing information from the Simple View of Reading from slides 3-8.

3. Then, partners switch roles--partner 2 then asks the question using a prompt and Partner 1 responds using a sentence starter.

When thinking about Scarborough’s Rope, the Simple View of Reading, and the effects of illiteracy, it becomes clear that all teachers share the goal of helping our students develop skillful reading comprehension across content areas. We need to embrace that we are all teachers of literacy skills. Do you agree? Disagree? What things come to your mind when you hear this? (Pause and allow teachers to share with table groups.)

19

IES Practice Guide The components in this presentation are derived from the Institute for Educational Sciences (IES): Adolescent Literacy Practice Guide (released August 2008), which is a collection of the best available evidence related to specific topics. Facilitator’s Note: There is additional information on the development of the IES guides in appendix A of the guide. A short excerpt on evidence-based practice and how it is noted in the guide: “The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) publishes practice guides to share evidence and expert guidance on addressing education-related challenges not readily solved with a single program, policy, or practice. Each practice guide’s panel of experts develops recommendations for a coherent approach to a multifaceted problem. Each recommendation is explicitly connected to supporting evidence. Using common standards, the supporting evidence is rated to reflect how well the research demonstrates the effectiveness of the recommended practices. Strong evidence means positive findings are demonstrated in multiple well-designed, well-executed studies, leaving little or no doubt that the positive effects are caused by the recommended practice. Moderate evidence means well-designed studies show positive impacts, but there are questions about whether the findings can be generalized beyond the study samples or whether the studies definitively show evidence that the practice is effective. Minimal evidence means that there is not definitive evidence that the recommended practice is effective in improving the outcome of interest, although there may be data to suggest a correlation between the practice and the outcome of interest” (p. 39).

20

Recommendations for Improving Literacy The IES guide recommends five areas of instruction for improving literacy. Please take a minute to read these five recommendations. (Wait time). Why do you think the IES panelists identified these five things? (Wait and allow for sharing). Notice today’s focus is in bold. This session is focused on taking a closer look at Recommendation 3: “Provide opportunities for extended discussion of text and interpretation.” Our goal today is to provide some tools that can be used across content areas for improving student literacy, specifically through extended discussion of text and interpretation in literacy learning More information on the five recommendations can be located from the IES website: www.ies.ed.gov

21

Before we jump into this topic, let’s discuss how extended discussion of text and interpretation fits into the larger picture of becoming a skilled reader by connecting today’s focus back to Scarborough’s Rope, which draws on the research-supported representation of how reading comprehension develops. Remember, the rope characterizes skillful reading comprehension as a combination of two separate but equally important components: word recognition skills and language comprehension ability. Discussion mostly supports the Language Comprehension portion of “the rope”. Productive and accountable student conversations expands vocabulary and builds skills that transfer into literacy skills. “More complex aspects of oral language, including syntax, complex measures of vocabulary (such as those in which children actually define or explain word meanings), and listening comprehension were clearly related to later reading comprehension

(National Early Literacy Panel, 2008). Structured Partner Activity: Take turns sharing your understanding of Scarborough’s Rope, along with anything you’re wondering or have questions about.

22

After our session today, you will be able to: • Understand how extended discussion improves comprehension • Observe (by watching a video) how a teacher facilitates discussions;

discuss instructional strategies for facilitation • Describe two or more formats that will facilitate extended discussions • Practice a discussion protocol and apply it to current core

instructional materials I’m sure you are already using strategies and activities to help your students understand text in your classroom. So, let’s start there…

23

What strategies, resources, activities do you use in your classroom for extended discussions of text? Why? (Talk at tables or with a partner. Have participants share out as you generate a list on chart paper.)

24

Thank you for sharing what’s working in your classroom. Let’s read this quote together. Ready? “Research demonstrates…” Why is it important to provide discussion opportunities across all content areas? Discuss with a partner. (Wait and share out.)

25

Take a minute to read this quote. (Wait time.) This high-quality discourse can occur before, during, or after the reading of text. Research also demonstrates that when students have extended time for engaged conversation about text, they comprehend better and increase their autonomous comprehension and writing skills (Lawrence & Snow, 2012). Think about the students in your classroom. How have you seen discussion promote comprehension? (structured partners) Please keep your students in mind today as we discuss ways to improve literacy instruction for ALL of your learners.

26

Arriving at a deep understanding of important concepts often involves interactions— a student and teacher, and among peers. It is these collaborations that motivate students to think critically about a topic or issue, which affords them opportunities to share their thinking. As students work through texts they are reading, their knowledge and understanding are enriched through focused conversations with others before, during, and after reading/writing. Talking Chips Activity (Have participants write down ideas for each bullet on the slide. Provide wait time and then have participants share out with their table group using talking chips. Monitor and share out any additional answers as needed. Use the lists below to add information.) Here are 5 key benefits of providing extended discussions in all content areas. 1. Content Learning: What are some specific aspects of content learning

that often happen through discussions?

Through discussion, students

-Build content understandings -Cultivate connections -Co-construct understandings -Teachers and students assess learning

2. Language and Literacy: What are some specific aspects of content learning that often happen through discussions? (Wait time, share out and record answers on chart paper. Use the lists below to add information.) Through discussion, students

-Build academic language -Build vocabulary -Build literacy skills and comprehension -Build oral language and communication skills

3.Thinking Skills: What are some specific aspects of thinking skills that often happen through discussions? (Wait time, share out and record answers on chart paper. Use the lists below to add information.) Through discussion, students

-Build thinking skills -Foster creativity -Promote different perspectives and empathy -Foster skills for negotiating meaning and focusing

4.Psychological: What are some specific psychological aspects that often

happen through discussions? (Wait time, share out and record answers on chart paper. Use the lists below to add information.) Through discussion, students

-Develop inner dialog and self-talk -Build engagement and motivation -Build confidence & academic identity -Foster self-discovery -Build student voice & empowerment

5.Socio-cultural: What are some specific aspects of socio-cultural that often happen through extended discussions? (Wait time, share out and record answers on chart paper. Use the lists below to add information.) Through discussion, students

-Build relationships -Build collaborative academic ambience -Make lessons more culturally relevant -Foster equity

Looking at the chart we created together, how might you talk with a parent or colleague about the importance of extended discussions in your specific content area? Turn and talk with a partner. (Listen in as partners share. Share out whole group.)

27

Asking students to share their ideas in a collaborative discussion group is an important aspect of learning. However, these groups must be structured in such a way that the discussions are meaningful, on topic, and respectful of ideas presented. This requires an ongoing review of guidelines for discussion, an intentional plan for grouping students, and a specific purpose to frame the discussion. How can we most effectively provide opportunities for extended discussion of text meaning and interpretation in the classroom? According to the IES guide: Carefully prepare for discussions: Develop a purpose for discussion so that students have a clear focus. Also, identify in advance the issues or content that might be difficult or misunderstood. Today you will receive tools to help you prepare for discussions. Ask follow-up questions that help provide continuity and extend the discussion. Effective discussion questions are “authentic”—they ask a real question open to multiple points of view, such as:

• Did the way that John treated Alex in this story seem fair to you? • What is the author trying to say here? • How does that information connect with what the author wrote

before?

Provide a task, or a discussion format, that students can follow when they discuss texts together in small groups. Develop and practice the use of a specific “discussion protocol” Develop specific discussion formats and scaffolds to engage students. Teachers must model and teach specific skills in order for student to engage in high quality conversations.

28

A purpose or target brings clarity, motivation, and a reason to participate. Handout 1: Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Wheel is a handy tool that you can use to prepare a purpose for discussion. (Distribute Handout 1.) For example, “In our discussion today, we will learn to articulate a new perspective.” This sets a purpose. I can now use my DOK Wheel to prepare questions such as, “How do you think Tom Robinson’s trial changed Scout’s life?” Question stems could include use, classify, show, construct. Other examples of a discussion purpose:

• Solve a problem: E.g., Develop and propose a solution to the dropout problem with U.S. students. Question stems: design, propose, create, devise, formulate

• Make a case or debate: E.g., What do you believe to be most important priority of the Cuban government? Question stems: justify, assess, recommend, decide, prioritize

Structured Partner Activity How might you use the DOK wheel with a lesson to state a purpose for literacy learning in your core curriculum? Turn in your core instructional materials and find examples of level 1, 2, 3, and 4 questions from the DOK wheel.

What specific difficulties do your students encounter with classroom discussions? How do you address these difficulties? (structured partners) Co-designing protocols and expectation can help to address discussion challenges because expectations become clear. Together is always better when establishing protocols and expectations with students. Ownership, buy-in, motivation, and meaning are just a few benefits for collaboration and

29 decision-making together. Here are a few examples of discussion protocols for teachers:

• Ask questions that require explanations of positions and reasoning. • Model reasoning processes by thinking aloud. • Propose counterarguments or positions. • Recognize good reasoning. • Summarize the flow and main ideas of a discussion as it draws to a

close. Examples of student protocols:

• Talking: Saying “in my opinion” and “according to the text” • Listening: Nodding, making positive eye contact, not interrupting, not

having side conversations • SLANT: Sit up, Lean in, Ask questions, Nod in agreement, Track the

speaker with your eye. • Sentence Stems: Providing sentence frames as a scaffold for discussion

(this video on talk moves is helpful in showing this. https://www.teachingchannel.org/video/teaching-ells-to-participate-in-discussions-ousd)

Video Activity (Other videos the presenter may want to show: https://vimeo.com/6771095 or https://www.teachingchannel.org/video/participation-protocol-ousd Or https://www.teachingchannel.org/video/teaching-higher-order-thinking-skills Set a purpose for each video you show. Pose guiding questions like on slide 31 or have participants write down things they learn that they want to try or how what they see on the video validates what they do in the classroom) Here are three example rules you may set up:

• Listen actively.

• Contribute actively. • Use the text and recently learned vocabulary to support your answer.

30

What are some of the things that you do to create a safe and supportive environment that is conducive to class discussion? (structured partners or cold calling) It’s really important to create a safe environment for discussions. As you watch this video, notice the classroom climate. How would describe it? Also, notice and take notes on 1) how Mr. Berryman prepared students for group collaboration; 2) how he monitored and supported the progress of students in each group; 3) how students listened to and responded to each other; and 4) student comments on the value of group work (show participants slide 31 with the questions before viewing the video) Video link to be provided by Education Northwest

31

Talking Chips Activity (Have participants reflect at their tables using the questions on the slide.)

• How would you describe the classroom climate? What did you notice about how Mr. Berryman prepared students for collaboration?

• How was the purpose and focus of the discussion communicated? • What was the role of the teacher during student collaboration? How

did he monitor and support student learning? • How did students listen and respond to each other? How did this

support learning? • What did you find effective in this video that you might implement in

your classroom? Why?

32

Now let’s watch a video on Deconstructing Word Problems. As you watch, notice and take notes on 1) the purpose and focus of groups; 2) what the teacher was doing and why; and 3) how the collaboration was supporting student learning. Video link to be provided by Education Northwest

33

(Have participants reflect at their tables using the questions on the slide.)

• How did the purpose and focus of groups in each video differ?

• What was the role of the teacher in each video during student collaboration?

• How did students use collaborative discussions to deepen their understanding of the lesson concepts?

• What did you find new or interesting in these videos that you might implement in your classroom?

34

Dialoging with students “in the moment” can be challenging. Remember, we want to make our students do the thinking not just produce a correct answer to our question. Listen to this example of effective dialogue: I’ll roleplay the teacher (A), who would like to be the student (B)? (Give “student” the script.) A: Why did the author write this? B: To tell us about the Boston Massacre. But what I don’t get was why it was called a massacre if only 7 people were killed. A: Can you elaborate? B: Well, the people weren’t so famous, and a massacre usually means lots of people die. Maybe the people reporting it wanted to make it sound really bad. Maybe they wanted to get people all mad in order to rebel, like, to start the

Revolution. A: At that time, not everyone wanted to rebel. B: Oh, well, a lot of times in the newspapers—I don’t think they had radio or T.V. back then—would make up stuff… A: You mean exaggerate? B: Yeah, they would exaggerate things or focus on things or not print things to influence people. So calling it a massacre made the English look really evil, right? A: Maybe. How about today? How can we apply these ideas to today? B: Like, in commercials they only talk about good parts. And reporting on the war in Iraq might be biased, depending on the source. A: But why? B: Maybe to influence voters to vote to get troops out. A: So we need to remember that words can be biased? What did you notice about the teacher’s questions? How did teacher’s questions promote thinking and learning? (Wait time and responses.)

35

Structured Partner Activity (Distribute Handout 2: Example Scripts for Math, Science, and Language Arts)

(Read slide aloud to introduce this activity.)

(Monitor by walking around and giving feedback when needed during the activity. Afterwards, have the partners use the debrief questions on the slide)

Extended Discussion of Text | 35

Our Turn

• Using Handout 2, choose which discipline you would like

to role play

• Practice the script with a partner

• Debrief: As the student, how did the teacher’s questions

help you learn?

• As the teacher, how did the questions connect to the DOK

levels on the DOK wheel we learned about earlier?

36

Asking Questions and Engaging in Dialogue Asking questions that are powerful, appreciative, and in the spirit of inquiry connects us to our own wisdom and intentions, bridges and leverages thinking differences, and fosters new possibilities by enabling the ability to see things from different perspectives. A cognitive shift occurs when the person speaking moves quickly from an intentional focus or thought process to a newly selected focus, perception, or way of thinking. A cognitive shift is mediated through a question, paraphrase, comment, or non-verbal communication that engages the speaker in a new way of thinking. Before we look at the suggested question types, consider the construction of a question. Some questions are more powerful than others. We aspire to asking the types of questions that open our own minds and others to new possibilities, clarification of thought, and intent. Questions can create pathways to positive experiences, excitement, provide space for reflection on issues of importance, and help people notice what is valued. Handout 3: Powerful Questions Bookmark and Handout 3a: Powerful Questions in Dialogue are helpful tools that students can use during a discussion to ask questions. (Distribute Handout 3 and 3a) Structured Partner Activity Thinking about the specific content area you teach, how might your students use this bookmark in your classroom? Go into your core instructional materials have find two or three examples of where students could use the powerful questions bookmark or powerful questions in dialogue. Be prepared to share with your partner. (give time for partners to share) These are great ideas, thank you for sharing. Now, let’s learn how we can

prepare and use questioning based on our lesson purpose.

37

Academic conversations are back-and-forth dialogues in which students focus on a topic and explore it by building, challenging, and negotiating relevant ideas. Unfortunately, academic conversations are rare in many classrooms. Talk is often dominated by the teacher and a few students, or it doesn't advance beyond short responses to the teacher's questions. Do you agree that extended discussions are rare (look for audience response of nods)? Talk with a partner about why they (academic conversations) are rare. (Listen in and then have partners share out to the whole group.) Even certain teaching approaches and curriculum programs neglect to train students on how to maintain a focused, respectful, and thoughtful conversation. To address these challenges, authors Jeff Zwiers and Marie Crawford have identified five core communication skills to help students hold productive academic conversations across content areas. These skills include elaborating and clarifying, supporting ideas with evidence, building on and/or challenging ideas, paraphrasing, and synthesizing. The Academic Conversation Placemat will help to guide us through these five areas of communication. (Pass out Handout 4: Academic Conversation Placemat and discuss each section of the placement shown on the next five slides.)

The Academic Conversations Placement from Academic Conversations: Classroom Talk that Fosters Critical Thinking and Content Understandings, by Jeff Zwiers and Marie Crawford, provides formats/protocols/questions for different discussion purposes. We must remember to “teach” these structures using a gradual release of responsibility.

38

The first structure on the placemat is Elaborate and Clarify. Take a minute to scan the information. What does the title and graphic tell you? Where would this format fit best in your curriculum? How might you use it in your classroom? (Have participants turn and talk with a partner, take notes, and then have them share out as you display ideas on a poster.)

39

A key element in focused conversations is the identification of specific ideas in texts or other resources that support thinking. In other words, students must be ready to “make a case” for the ideas they share with peers in a group discussion. Support Ideas with Examples (point to slide). Take a minute to scan the information. (Wait time.) What does the title and graphic tell you? Where would this format fit best in your curriculum? How might you use it in your classroom? (Have participants turn and talk with a partner, take notes, and then have them share out as you add ideas to the poster.)

40

Paraphrase: Where would this format fit best in your curriculum? How might you use it in your classroom?

(Have participants turn and talk with a partner, take notes, and then have them share out as you add ideas to the poster.)

41

Build on and/or challenge a partner’s idea: Take a minute to scan the information. (Wait time.) What does the title and graphic tell you? Where would this format fit best in your curriculum? How might you use it in your classroom? (Have participants turn and talk with a partner, take notes, and then have them share out as you add ideas to the poster.)

42

Synthesize Conversation Points: Take a minute to scan the information. (Wait time.) What does the title and graphic tell you? Where would this format fit best in your curriculum? How might you use it in your classroom? (Have participants turn and talk with a partner, take notes, and then have them share out as you add ideas to the poster.) (Wait time and share out ideas.)

43

There are many formats and protocols to choose from but we must remember to “teach” these structures using a gradual release of responsibility. Structured Partner Activity Choose a format from the list that would fit well with one of your lessons. Then, find examples in your core instructional materials where the format could be used (provide time and monitor and support as needed) Now, write on a sticky note these words for gradual release…

• I Do for model and teach • We Do for guided practice • You Do for application

Turn to your partner and share how you would use a gradual release of responsibility to teach your students using the examples you identified in your core instructional materials.

44

Our final activity is a think, write, and share reflection. Take some time to think about your responses to the questions, jot down your answers, and finally share your ideas with a partner.

Handouts

Handout List

1. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Wheel 2. Example Scripts 3. Powerful Questions in Dialogue 3a. Powerful Questions Bookmark 4. Academic Conversation Placemat

45

(Thank participants for their time and focus today.)

Background Resources for Facilitator The Simple View of Reading and the strands of early literacy development Teachers of reading share the goal of helping students develop skillful reading comprehension. The Simple View of Reading (Gough & Tunmer, 1986) is a research-supported representation of how reading comprehension develops. It characterizes skillful reading comprehension as a combination of two separate but equally important components: word recognition skills and language comprehension ability. In other words, to unlock comprehension of text, two keys are required—being able to read the words on the page and understanding what the words and language mean within the texts that children are reading (Davis, 2006). If a student cannot recognize words on the page accurately and automatically, fluency will be affected, and in turn, reading comprehension will suffer. Likewise, if a student has poor understanding of the meaning of the words, reading comprehension will suffer. Children who have success with reading comprehension are those who are skilled in both word recognition and language comprehension. These two essential components of the Simple View of Reading are represented by an illustration by Scarborough (2002). In her illustration, seen in Figure 1, twisting ropes represent the underlying skills and elements that come together to form two necessary braids that represent the two essential components of reading comprehension. Although the model itself is called “simple,” because it points out that reading comprehension is comprised of reading words and understanding the language of the words, in truth the two components are quite complex. Examination of Scarborough’s rope model reveals how multifaceted each is. For either of the two essential components to develop successfully, students need to be taught the elements necessary for automatic word recognition (i.e., phonological awareness, decoding, sight recognition of frequent/familiar words), and strategic language comprehension (i.e., background knowledge, vocabulary, verbal reasoning, literacy knowledge). Word recognition Word recognition is the act of seeing a word and recognizing its pronunciation immediately and without any conscious effort. If reading words requires conscious, effortful decoding, little attention is left for comprehension of a text to occur. Since reading comprehension is the ultimate goal in teaching children to read, a critical early objective is to ensure that they are able to read words with instant, automatic recognition (Garnett, 2011). Despite this word recognition that results from a mere glance at print, it is critical to understand that readers have not simply recognized what the words look like as wholes, or familiar shapes. Even though readers read so many words automatically and instantaneously, the brain still processes every letter in the words subconsciously.

To teach students word recognition, so they can achieve this automaticity, students require instruction in: phonological awareness, decoding, and sight recognition of high frequency words. Phonological awareness One of the critical requirements for decoding, and ultimately word recognition, is phonological awareness (Snow et al., 1998). Phonological awareness is a broad term encompassing an awareness of various-sized units of sounds in spoken words such as rhymes (whole words), syllables (large parts of words), and phonemes (individual sounds). Hearing “cat” and “mat,” and being aware that they rhyme, is a form of phonological awareness, and rhyming is usually the easiest and earliest form that children acquire. Likewise, being able to break the spoken word “teacher” into two syllables is a form of phonological awareness that is more sophisticated. Phoneme awareness, as mentioned previously, is an awareness of the smallest individual units of sound in a spoken word—its phonemes; phoneme awareness is the most advanced level of phonological awareness. Since the terms sound similar, phonological awareness is often confused with phoneme awareness. Teachers should know the difference, because awareness of larger units of sound — such as rhymes and syllables — develops before awareness of individual phonemes. Teachers should also understand and remember that neither phonological awareness nor its most advanced form, phoneme awareness, has anything whatsoever to do with print or letters. The activities that are used to teach them are entirely auditory. Why phonological awareness is important An abundance of research emerged in the 1970s documenting the importance of phoneme awareness (the most sophisticated form of phonological awareness) for learning to read and write (International Reading Association, 1998). Failing to develop this awareness of the sounds in spoken words leads to difficulties learning the relationship between speech and print that is necessary for learning to read (Snow et al., 1998). This difficulty can sometimes be linked to specific underlying causes, such as a lack of instructional experiences to help children develop phoneme awareness, or neurobiological differences that make developing an awareness of phonemes more difficult for some children (Rayner et al., 2001). Phoneme awareness facilitates the essential connection that is “reading,” which is the sequences of individual sounds in spoken words match up to sequences of printed letters on a page. To illustrate the connection between phoneme awareness and reading, picture the steps that children must perform as they are beginning to read and spell words. First, they must accurately sound out the letters, one at a time, holding them in memory, and then blend them together correctly to form a word. Conversely, when beginning to spell words, they must segment a spoken word into its phonemes and then represent each phoneme with its corresponding letter(s). Even if it is not audible, children are still “hearing the word” in their minds. Therefore, both reading and spelling are dependent on the ability to segment and blend phonemes, as well as match the sounds to letters. And as stated previously,

some students have great difficulty developing these skills. The good news is that these important skills can be effectively taught. Decoding Another critical component for word recognition is the ability to decode words. When teaching children to accurately decode words, they must understand the alphabetic principle and know letter-sound correspondences. When students make the connection that letters signify the sounds that we say, they are said to understand the purpose of the alphabetic code, or the “alphabetic principle.” Letter-sound correspondences are known when students can provide the correct sound for letters and letter combinations. Students can then be taught to decode, which means to blend the letter sounds together to read words. Decoding is a deliberate act in which readers must “consciously and deliberately apply their knowledge of the mapping system to produce a plausible pronunciation of a word they do not instantly recognize” (Beck & Juel, 1995, p. 9). Once a word is accurately decoded a few times, it is likely to become recognized without conscious deliberation, leading to efficient word recognition. Why decoding is important Similar to phonological awareness, neither understanding the alphabetic principle nor knowledge of letter-sound correspondences come naturally. Some children are able to gain insights about the connections between speech and print on their own just from exposure and rich literacy experiences, while many others require instruction. Such instruction results in dramatic improvement in word recognition (Boyer & Ehri, 2011). Decoding instruction Teaching children letter-sound correspondences and how to decode may seem remarkably simple and straightforward. Yet teaching them well enough and early enough, so children can begin to read and comprehend books independently, is influenced by the kind of instruction that is provided. There are many programs and methods available for teaching students to decode, but extensive evidence exists that instruction that is both systematic and explicit is more effective than instruction that is not (Brady, 2011; NRP, 2000). Sight word recognition The third critical component for successful word recognition is sight word recognition. A small percentage of words cannot be identified by deliberately sounding them out, yet they appear frequently in print. They are “exceptions,” because some of their letters do not follow common letter-sound correspondences. Examples of such words are “once” and “does.” As a result of the irregularities, exception words must be memorized. Sounding them out will not work.

Since these exception words must often be memorized as a visual unit (i.e., by sight), they are frequently called “sight words,” and this leads to confusion among teachers. This is because words that occur frequently in print, even those that are decodable (e.g., “in,” “will” and “can”), are also often called “sight words.” Of course, it is important for these decodable, highly frequent words to be learned early (preferably by attending to their sounds rather than just by memorization), right along with the others that are not decodable, because they appear so frequently in the texts that will be read. Why sight word recognition is important One third of beginning readers’ texts are mostly comprised of familiar, high frequency words, such as “the” and “of,” and almost half of the words in print are comprised of the 100 most common words (Fry, Kress, & Fountoukidis, 2000). It is no wonder that these words need to be learned to the point of automaticity, so smooth, fluent word recognition and reading can take place. Word recognition summary For students to achieve automatic and effortless word recognition, three important underlying elements — phonological awareness, letter-sound correspondences for decoding, and sight recognition of irregularly spelled familiar words — must be taught to the point that they too are automatic. Word recognition, the act of seeing a word and recognizing its pronunciation without conscious effort, is one of the two critical components in the Simple View of Reading that must be achieved to enable successful reading comprehension. Language comprehension and its connections to knowledge Davis (2006) wrote that “even the best phonics-based skills program will not transform a child into a strong reader if the child has limited knowledge of the language, impoverished vocabulary, and little knowledge of key subjects” (p. 15). Language comprehension consists of three elements that must be taught, so students apply them strategically (as opposed to automatically) during reading. As students interpret the meaning of texts, they must strategically apply their background knowledge, their knowledge of the vocabulary, and their understanding of the language structures that exist between words and within sentences. Reading comprehension includes “the process of simultaneously extracting and constructing meaning through interaction and involvement with written language” (Snow, 2002, p. xiii), as well as the “capacities, abilities, knowledge, and experiences” one brings to the reading situation (p. 11). In line with the first part of this definition, it is expected that once children have been taught sounds and letters, how to blend them together to decode, so they read text fluently, along with lessons in vocabulary, they will be on their way to successful reading comprehension. Reading instruction in schools focuses so heavily on developing reading comprehension, because this ability is the ultimate goal of reading.

Reading comprehension ability is complex and multifaceted; it is comprised of understanding a text’s vocabulary, knowledge of the particular topic, and comprehension of its language structures (Cain & Oakhill, 2007). Language comprehension includes the interaction among someone’s background knowledge, vocabulary, language structures like grammar, verbal reasoning abilities, and literary knowledge (e.g., genres). Language comprehension is a more general term than listening comprehension, which is the ability to understand and make sense of spoken language. Once students become more competent at word recognition, the dominant factor driving reading comprehension transforms to become language comprehension (Foorman, Francis, Shaywitz, Shaywitz, & Fletcher, 1997). The reason for this boils down to one word—knowledge. Once students can read the words, they extract meaning from texts using their overall knowledge and experiences (background knowledge), their knowledge of words (vocabulary), and their knowledge of how words go together to create meaning (language comprehension). This accumulation of knowledge can last a lifetime and never be considered “finished.” In fact, knowledge is so important to consider, that a brief commentary on its contribution to reading comprehension is next, before going on to discuss the three elements in Scarborough’s (2002) braid that lead to language comprehension, and ultimately reading comprehension. Subtle differences exist between the terms “knowledge” and “background knowledge.” In this chapter, “knowledge” is broadly defined as the total accumulation of facts and information a person has gained from previous experiences (it is also called general knowledge). Knowledge is composed of concepts, ideas and factual information, which eventually come together to contribute to understanding in various situations. One does need facts and concepts and ideas to perform a procedure (e.g., putting historical events on a timeline, editing a paper for mechanical errors, reading a map), but they are even more vital when partaking in situations or conditions that require synthesizing a lot of information (e.g., writing a comprehensive essay on a topic, comprehending an author’s message while reading a book) (Marzano & Kendall, 2007). “Background knowledge,” on the other hand, is a term used in education for a specific subset of knowledge needed to comprehend a particular situation, lesson, or text (it is also called “prior knowledge”). When reading a text about dog training, readers are going to use their background (prior) knowledge of dog behavior, vocabulary related to dogs, aspects of training, and so on, to comprehend text. They will not need to apply any of their knowledge of outer space, photosynthesis, or baking (any of their general, overall knowledge) in this particular instance. It is not possible for educators to teach the required background knowledge for every text that students will encounter as they progress through their school years. They can, however, provide the next best thing—a wide base of general knowledge that can be drawn upon and applied as background knowledge to problem-solve and create meaning.

General knowledge comes from years of exposure to books, newspapers, knowledge-rich school curricula, television programs, experiences, and conversations. Its value cannot be understated. Willingham (2006) summarizes the findings in cognitive science regarding the significance of knowledge in education this way:

Those with a rich base of factual knowledge find it easier to learn more — the rich get richer. In addition, factual

knowledge enhances cognitive processes like problem solving and reasoning. The richer the knowledge base, the more

smoothly and effectively these cognitive processes — the very ones that teachers target — operate. So, the more

knowledge students accumulate, the smarter they become. (p. 30)

Background knowledge One of the three elements necessary for language comprehension is background knowledge. As mentioned above, background knowledge is a particular subset of knowledge (e.g., facts about the world, events, people, sayings and phrases) that is needed to comprehend and learn from a particular situation, lesson, or text. Young readers learn to apply their background knowledge strategically in order to interpret a text’s meaning. Why background knowledge is important Background knowledge allows readers to infer the author’s meaning strategically with a lot less effort. Drawing inferences from a text is so much easier when a reader is already familiar with what the author is talking about. Willingham (2006) summarized some of the findings in cognitive science regarding how background knowledge helps students comprehend what they read and remember what they have learned. Background knowledge of a text makes it so that fewer instances are necessary of having to stop or reread for clarification. The author’s point is comprehended right away. Less obvious, background knowledge allows readers to arrange sequences of events in texts into connected, meaningful units or sequences that can be more easily analyzed, understood, and remembered. Without background knowledge, words and sentences in a text easily become disjointed, unrelated, random sequences. Without the ability to chunk together and activate various words and ideas automatically, reading comprehension will suffer. The beauty and value of background knowledge is that it provides the familiarity that is crucial for connections that both create new learning and allow for the new learning to be remembered.

Vocabulary Vocabulary knowledge is a prominent predictor of reading comprehension and is depicted as a central thread in the language comprehension component of the Simple View of Reading, because of its connections to background knowledge and language structures (Scarborough, 2002). Why vocabulary is important As stated previously, the level of a child’s vocabulary knowledge is a strong predictor of reading comprehension (Duncan et al., 2007). This seems obvious, since not knowing the meaning of words in a text makes it quite difficult to comprehend. Adams noted that

What makes vocabulary valuable and important is not the words themselves so much as the understandings they

afford. The reason we need to know the meanings of words is that they point to the knowledge from which we are to

construct, interpret, and reflect on the meaning of text.

Language structures The final element contributing to language comprehension is language structure — the relationships between the words and sentences in a text. There are many facets to language structures, including knowledge of grammar, being able to make inferences, and having knowledge of literacy concepts, such as what reading strategies to use for different types of texts (e.g., poems versus informational texts). To simplify and streamline these ideas, they will be categorized as having to do with the major components of language that are interconnected: form, content, and use (Bloom & Lahey, 1978). Why language form is important Language form comprises the rules for how words are structured (see ‘morphology’ described below) as well as the rules for the arrangement of words within sentences and phrases (see ‘syntax’ described below). The act of constructing meaning while reading is complex, so it is not surprising that morphology and syntax also contribute to reading comprehension. Morphology is the study of morphemes in a language. Not to be confused with phonemes, which are the smallest units of sound in spoken words, morphemes are the smallest units of meaning in words (to remember this, consider that “morphemes” and “meaning” both begin with the letter “m”). Words contain one or more morphemes, or units of meaning.

Another aspect of language form, syntax, is commonly referred to as grammar. It is the combining and ordering of words in sentences and phrases that enables comprehension of a text. For example, in English, when the article “a” or “an” appears in a sentence, it is expected that a noun will follow. Syntax includes sentence construction elements, like statements, commands, and combined sentences, as well as particular sentence components, such as nouns, adjectives, and prepositional phrases. These are important for future teachers to know, because effective use of these will allow students to comprehend text more successfully, and they will also allow students to demonstrate command of the conventions of the language in their writing pieces. Why language content is important Language content that is comprised of the meaning of the relationships that exist between words, phrases, and sentences is known as semantics. Semantics is different from vocabulary, because it extends beyond the individual meaning of words. Note that once again, there is an “m” in this “semantics,” but it is in the middle of the word, which may help you to remember it has to do with the meaning that ties words (and sentences) together. Understanding the semantics of language enables comprehension, because it clarifies the content — the network of events and relationships that exists in texts. Semantics requires knowledge of vocabulary (a word’s meaning, and perhaps its synonyms and antonyms), as well as syntax. Just as important is background knowledge in order to form correct judgments about the context being read. Language use is termed pragmatics. Pragmatics are the rules of language that lead to appropriate use in assorted settings and contexts. Each setting (e.g., school, home, restaurant, job interview, playground) or context (e.g., greeting, inquiry, negotiation, explanation) has a particular purpose. To communicate appropriately, students must learn patterns of conversation and dialogue that occur in assorted settings. Understanding the nuances of pragmatics contributes to language comprehension, which in turn enables a reader to recognize its uses in written text, leading to more successful reading comprehension. The pragmatics of language use in school requires students to comprehend academic language. In conclusion To help students develop language comprehension, the underlying meaning-based elements of reading — background knowledge, vocabulary, and language structures — must be taught and monitored. Unlike teaching students to recognize words accurately and automatically, so they become fluent readers, teaching the elements of language comprehension must be done, so students become increasingly strategic about extracting the meaning from texts they read. This is an incremental, ongoing, developmental process that lasts a lifetime. With each new bit of background knowledge, each new vocabulary word, and each new understanding of language use, students can integrate this knowledge strategically to comprehend text. The two essential components of the Simple View of Reading, automatic word recognition and strategic language comprehension, contribute to the ultimate goal of teaching reading: skilled reading comprehension. Once students become

proficient decoders and can automatically identify words, the role of language comprehension becomes increasingly important as students shift from paying attention to the words to paying attention to meaning (Scarborough, 2002).

References National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Retrieved June 7, 2019 from www.ninds.hih.gov/disorders/patient-caregiver-eduction/understanding-sleep#1 Brown, Campione, and Day (1981); Dole et al. (1991); Kame’enui et al. (1997); Pearson and Dole (1987); Pressley, Snyder, and CarigliaBull (1987). Idaho Content Standards. English Language Arts/Literacy. Retrieved from http://sde.idaho.gov/academic/shared/ela-literacy/booklets/ELA-Literacy-Standards.pdf IES Adolescent Reading Practice Guide: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide.aspx?sid=8 Marzano, Robert J. Classroom Instruction That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. New Jersey, Prentice Hall Publishing, 2004. Scarborough, H. (2001 Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In S. Newman & D. Dickinson (Eds.). What Works Clearinghouse Practice Guides, https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguides Williamson, G. L. (2008). A Text Readability Continuum for Postsecondary Readiness. Journal of Advances Academics. Retrieved June 5, 2019 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ822324.pdf