Improving Fire Resistance ofFaculty of Engineering ŗŪťƈƌƃŒ ŗƒƄƂ Civil Engineering...

��

� � ��

Islamic University of Gaza ŗƒƆƚŪƗŒ�ŗŶƆœŞƃŒ�ŖŨŹ� ��

Higher Education Deanship�� œƒƄŶƃŒ�ŘœŪŒŧťƃŒ�ŖťœƆŵ� ��

Faculty of Engineering ŗŪťƈƌƃŒ�ŗƒƄƂ� ��

Civil Engineering Department �ƅŪſ�ŗŪťƈƌƃŒŗƒƈťƆƃŒ� ��

Design and Rehabilitation of Structures �¾ƒƋŋř�ƍ�ƅƒƆŮř�ŝƆœƈŧŕŘŉŬƈƆƃŒ� ��

Improving Fire Resistance of

Reinforced Concrete Columns

ϖϳήΤϠϟ�ΔΤϠδϤϟ�ΔϴϧΎγήΨϟ�ΓΪϤϋϷ�ΔϣϭΎϘϣ�ϦϴδΤΗ��

By

Khaled Mohammed Nassar

Supervised By

Prof. Samir Shihada

A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering Rehabilitation

and Design of Structures

��˰ϫ��ϡ�

id14254171 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com

��

� � ��

��

��

úČ»Æ÷¥�þwÆ÷¥�7¥�úÌ©� ��

��

��

�(×å�ÚÔàÛ�æàÛy�Þë¤×�âØ×�ÂË¦ëā \ ` ] ] \ \ ā ] ā \ ` \

^ ^ ^ÚØÄ×�æå{�Þë¤\ ` ` ] ] \^ ^ ¥¡[

\ \ \��&��

��ΩΎΠϤϟϟ�Δϳϵ�Δ��

��Ϣϴψόϟ�Ϳ�ϕΪλ��

��

��

��

��

��

��

(�Ú×Ã�è×�Ýå¡¦«å�ÝæàÛ~Ü×å�â×æ«¥å�ÚÔØÜÃ�âØ×�ç¦ì¬Ë�æØÜÃ�ÖÏå^ ^ ^ ^ ^\ \ \ Ă \ ] \ \ \ ] ` ] ` \ ] ] ] \ \ ` ] \ \ \ ] ā \ \ \ \ ] \ ` ] \

ØÜÄ�ÚàÓ�Ü�ÚÔàìË�¡ä°×å�ìÈ×] \ ` \ ` ] ` ] \ ` ] ] ă \ ] \ \ \ ā \ ` \ `

^ ^ ^Ýæ\&��

��

��

ΔΑϮΘϟ�Δϳϵ��

��Ϣϴψόϟ�Ϳ�ϕΪλ��

��

� � ��

Dedication

��

I would like to dedicate this work to my family specially my mother and

my father who loved and raised me, to my loving wife and daughters and

to my brothers and sisters, for their sacrifice and endless support

Improving Fire Resistance of Abstract Reinforced Concrete Columns��

� � ��

� � ��

I

��

��

Abstract:��

Fire has become one of the greatest threats to buildings. Concrete is a primary

construction material and its properties of concrete to high temperatures have gained a

great deal of attention. Concrete structures when subjected to fire presented in general

good behavior. The low thermal conductivity of the concrete associated to its great

capacity of thermal insulation of the steel bars is the responsible for this good

behavior. However, there is a fundamental problem caused by high temperatures that

is the separation of concrete masses from the body of the concrete element " spalling

phenomenon ". Spalling of concrete leads to a decrease in the cross section area of

the concrete column and thereby decrease the resistances to axial loads, as well as the

reinforcement steel bars become exposed directly to high temperatures.

With the increase of incidents caused by major fires in buildings; research and

developmental efforts are being carried out in this area and other related disciplines.

This research is to investigate the behavior of the reinforced concrete columns at high

temperatures. Several samples of reinforced concrete columns with Polypropylene

(PP) fibers were used. Three mixes of concrete are prepared using different contents

of Polypropylene ;( 0.0 kg/m³, 0.5 kg/m³ and 0.75 kg/m³). Reinforced concrete

columns dimensions are (100 mm x100 mm x300 mm). The samples are heated for 2,

4 and 6 hours at 400 C°, 600 C° and 800°C and tested for compressive strength.

Also, the behavior of reinforcement steel bars at high temperatures is investigated.

Reinforcement steel bars are embedded into the concrete samples with 2 cm and 3 cm

concrete covers, after heating at 800°C for 6 hours. The reinforcement steel bars are

then extracted and tested for yield stress and maximum elongation ratio.

The analysis of results obtained from the experimental program showed that, the best

amount of PP to be used is 0.75 kg/m³, where the residual compressive strength is 20

% higher than of that when no PP fibers are used at 400 C for 6 hours. Moreover,

a 3 cm of concrete cover is in useful improving fire resistance for concrete structures

and providing a good protection for the reinforcement steel bars, where it is 5 %

higher than the column samples with 2 cm concrete cover at 6 hours and 600 C°.

Improving Fire Resistance of Abstract Reinforced Concrete Columns��

� � ��

� � ��

II

��

ΔλϼΨϟ��

� �

��ϲϧΎѧѧΒϤϟ�ΩΪѧѧϬΗ�ϲѧѧΘϟ�έΎѧѧτΧϷ�Ϣѧѧψϋ�Ϧѧѧϣ�ΓΪѧѧΣϭ�ϖѧѧήΤϟ�ήѧѧΒΘόΗ�ˬ��Ϧѧѧϣ�ϲѧѧγΎγ�ήμѧѧϨϋ�ήѧѧΒΘόΗ�ΔϧΎѧѧγήΨϟ�ϥ�ΚѧѧϴΣ�ϭ

Ϝϳ�ΔόϔΗήϣ�ΓέήΣ�ΕΎΟέΪϟ�ΎϬοήόΗ�ΪόΑ�ΎϬμΎμΧ�ϭ�ΎϬϛϮϠγ�ϥΈϓ�˯ΎϨΒϟ�ήλΎϨϋϡΎϤΘϫϻ�Ϧϣ�ήϴΒϛ�έΪϗ�ΐδΘ��

�Ύϋ�ϞϜθΑϡ��ϞϴѧλϮΘϟ�ΔϠϴΌѧο�ΎѧϬϧ�ΚѧϴΣ�ΔѧόϔΗήϣ�ΓέήѧΣ�ΕΎΟέΪѧϟ�ΎϬѧοήόΗ�˯ΎѧϨΛ�ΪѧϴΟ�ΎϛϮϠѧγ�ϱΪѧΒΗ�ΔϧΎѧγήΨϟ�ϥΈѧϓ�

��ϴϠδѧѧΘϟ�ΪѧϳΪΣ�ϥΎΒπѧѧϗ�Ϧѧѧϋ�ΓέήѧѧΤϠϟ�ΪѧѧϴΟ�ϝίΎѧѧϋ�ήѧѧΒΘόΗ�ΎѧѧϤϛ�ΓέήѧΤϠϟ��ΕΎѧѧΟέΩ�ΎϬΒΒδѧѧΗ�ΔϴѧѧγΎγ�ΔϠϜθѧѧϣ�ϙΎѧѧϨϫ�ϦѧѧϜϟϭ

�γήΧ�ϞΘϛ�ϝΎμϔϧ�ϲϓ�ϞΜϤΘΗ�ΔόϔΗήϤϟ�ΓέήΤϟ��ϲѧϓ�ϥΎμѧϘϧ�ΙϭΪѧΣ�ϰѧϟ·�ϱΩΆѧϳ�Ύѧϣ�ϲϧΎѧγήΨϟ�ήμϨόϟ�ϢδΟ�Ϧϋ�ΔϴϧΎ

�ϪѧѧϴϠϋ�Δϴѧѧγήϟ�ϝΎѧѧϤΣϷ�ϲѧѧϓ�ΔѧѧϴϟΎϋ�ΓΩΎѧѧϳί�ϲϟΎѧѧΘϟΎΑ�ϭ�ϲϧΎѧѧγήΨϟ�ΩϮѧѧϤόϠϟ�ϊѧѧτϘϤϟ�ΔΣΎδѧѧϣˬ�ΪѧѧϳΪΣ�ϥΎΒπѧѧϗ�ΒμѧѧΗ�Ϛϟάѧѧϛ

��ΎϬΘηΎθϫ�Ϧϣ�Ϊϳΰϳ�ϭ�Ϊθϟ�ϯϮϗ�ϞϤΤΗ�ϰϠϋ�ΎϬΗέΪϗ�ϞϠϘϳ�ΎϤϣ�ΔόϔΗήϤϟ�ΓέήΤϠϟ�ήηΎΒϣ�ϞϜθΑ�Δοήόϣ�ϴϠδΘϟ�ˬ�άϫϭ

ϗ�ϪϠϛΔϴϧΎγήΨϟ�ΕθϨϤϟ�ϲϓ�ΕέΎϴϬϧϻ�ΙϭΪΣ�ϲϓ�ήηΎΒϣ�ϞϜθΑ�ΐΒδΘϳ�Ϊ��

��ϲϧΎѧΒϤϟ�ϰѧϠϋ�ΎϫήτΧ�ϭ�ϖήΤϟ�ΙΩϮΣ�ΩΎϳΩί�ϊϣ�ˬ�Έѧϓϥ��ϭ�ϝΎѧΠϤϟ�άѧϫ�ϲѧϓ�ϱήѧΠΗ�ΔѧΜϴΜΣ�ΔѧϳϮϤϨΗ�ϭ�ΔѧϴΜΤΑ�ΩϮѧϬΟ�

ΔϴϟΎόϟ�ΓέήΤϟ�ΕΎΟέΪϟ�ΔΤϠδϤϟ�ΔϧΎγήΨϟ�ΔϣϭΎϘϣ�ϦϴδΤΘϟ�ΔϟϭΎΤϣ�ϲϓ�ΔϠμϟ�ΕΫ�ΕϻΎΠϤϟ��

��ΤΒϟ�άϫ�ϝϭΎϨΘϳ�ΔΤϠδѧϤϟ�ΔϴϧΎγήΨϟ�ΓΪϤϋϷ�ϙϮϠγ�ΔγέΩ�Κ�ˬ��ΕΎѧϨϴϋ�ϲѧϓ�ϦϴϠΑϭήѧΑ�ϲϟϮѧΒϟ�ϑΎѧϴϟ�ϡΪΨΘѧγ�ϢѧΗ�Ϊѧϗ�ϭ

�ΔΤϠδѧѧϤϟ�ΔϴϧΎѧѧγήΨϟ�ΓΪѧϤϋϷ��ϲϟϮѧѧΒϟ�ϑΎѧѧϴϟ�Ϧѧѧϣ�ΔѧѧϔϠΘΨϣ�ΕΎѧѧϴϤϛ�ϰѧѧϠϋ�ϱϮѧѧΘΤΗ�ΔϴϧΎѧѧγήΧ�ΕΎѧѧτϠΧ�ΙϼѧѧΛ�ΩΪѧѧϋ·�ϢѧѧΗϭ

�ϲϫ�ϭ�ϦϴϠΑϭήΑ;( 0.75 kg/m³ and, 0.5 kg/m³ 0.0 kg/m³)�ΕΫ�ΔϴϧΎγήΧ�ΓΪϤϋ�ΐλϭ��ΩΎόΑϷ��

)mm300 mm x 100 mm x��ΔѧѧϔϠΘΨϣ�ΓέήѧѧΣ�ΕΎΟέΪѧѧϟ�νήόΘΘѧѧγ�ϲѧѧΘϟ�ϭ� ,°C 600,C°004

°C800��ΓΪϤϟ�ϭ��ˬ��ˬ��ΔϋΎγ�ˬ�ϢΛ�Ϧϣϭ�ςϐπϠϟ�ΎϬϠϤΤΗ�ΓϮϗ�κΤϓ�έΎΒΘΧ�ήδϜϟ��.��

��ϴϠδΘϟ�ΪϳΪΣ�ϰϠϋ�ΔόϔΗήϤϟ�ΓέήΤϟ�ήϴΛ΄Η�ΔγέΩ�ϢΗ�Ϛϟάϛ�ˬ��ϖѧϤϋ�ΪѧϨϋ�ΪѧϳΪΤϟ�ϥΎΒπѧϗ�ϦϓΩ�ϢΗ�ΚϴΣ��ϭ�Ϣѧγ��ѧγ��Ϣ

�ΓέήΣ�ΔΟέΪϟ�ΎϬπϳήόΗ�ϢΛ��ΔϴϧΎγήΨϟ�ΓΪϤϋϷ�ϲϓ°C800 �ΓΪϤϟ��ΕΎϋΎγ��ˬ��ΪѧϳΪΣ�ϥΎΒπѧϗ�ΝήΨΘѧγ�ϢΗ�ϚϟΫ�ΪόΑ

ΔϟΎτΘγϻ�ΔΒδϧ�Δϓήόϣ�ϭ�Ϊθϟ�ϞϤΤΗ�έΎΒΘΧ�ϖϴΒτΗϭ�ΔϴϧΎγήΨϟ�ΓΪϤϋϷ�Ϧϣ�ϴϠδΘϟ��

�ϥΎΒπѧѧϗ�ΕΎѧѧϨϴϋ�ϰѧѧϠϋ�ϭ�ΔϴϧΎѧѧγήΨϟ�ΓΪѧѧϤϋϷ�ϰѧѧϠϋ�Δѧѧϣίϼϟ�ΕέΎѧѧΒΘΧϻ�ϖѧѧϴΒτΗ�Ϧѧѧϣ�˯ΎѧѧϬΘϧϻ�ΪѧѧόΑ�ΪѧѧϘϓ�ϴϠδѧѧΘϟ�ΪѧѧϳΪΣ�

�ϰϠϋ�ϱϮΘΤΗ�ϲΘϟ�ΕΎϨϴόϟ�ϥ�ΞΎΘϨϟ�ΕήϬχ0.75 kg/m³ϴϠΑϭήΑ�ϲϟϮΑ��Ϧ��ςϐπѧϟ�ϯϮϗ�ϞϤΤΘϟ�ήΒϛ�ΔϣϭΎϘϣ�ϱΪΒΗ�

�ΔΒδϨΑ��ΓέήΣ�ΔΟέΩ�ΪϨϋ�ϚϟΫ�ϭ�ϦϴϠΑϭήΑ�ϲϟϮΒϟ�ϰϠϋ�ϱϮΘΤΗ�ϻ�ϲΘϟ�ΕΎϨϴόϟ�Ϧϣ° C�� ΔѧϴϨϣί�ΓΪѧϣ�ϭ��

ΕΎϋΎѧѧγ�ˬΨϟ�ΓΪѧѧϤϋϷ�ΕΎѧѧϨϴϋ�ϥΈѧѧϓ�ϚѧѧϟΫ�ϰѧѧϠϋ�Γϭϼѧѧϋ�ΔϴϧΎѧѧγήΧ�ΔѧѧϴτϐΗ�ΎѧѧϬϟ�ϲѧѧΘϟ�ΔϴϧΎѧѧγή��ϯϮѧѧϘϟ�ΔѧѧϣϭΎϘϣ�ϱΪѧѧΒΗ�Ϣѧѧγ�

�ΔΒδϨΑ�ήΜϛ�ςϐπϟ��ΔϴϧΎγήΧ�ΔϴτϐΗ�ΎϬϟ�ϲΘϟ�ΕΎϨϴόϟ�Ϧϣ��ΓέήѧΣ�ΔΟέΩ�ϚϟΫ�ϭ�Ϣγ�° C�� ΔѧϴϨϣί�ΓΪѧϣ�ϭ

�ΕΎϋΎγ��

��

� � ��

III

��

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I would like to extend my gratitude and my sincere thanks to my honorable, esteemed

supervisor, Assoc. Prof. Samir M. Shihada, for his exemplary guidance and

encouragement.

Also, I would like extend my sincere appreciation to all who helped me in currying

out this thesis.

I would like to thank all my lecturers in the Islamic University of Gaza from whom I

learned much and developed my skills.

My deepest appreciation and thanks to every one who helped me in the completeness

of this study, especially to the staff of Material & Soil Laboratory in the Islamic

University of Gaza, and the staff of Sharaf factory.

��

IV

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT

I

ACKNOWLEDGMENT .. III

TABLE OF CONTENTS . IV

LIST OF FIGURES . VII

LIST OF TABLES ... IX

LIST OF APPREVIATIONS . X

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction .................................................................. 1

1.2 Statement of Problem... 2

1.3 Research Objectives . 3

1.4 Research Methodology . 4

1.5 Thesis Organization... 5

CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Introduction ............................... 6

2.2 Concrete. 6

2.2.1 Benefits of concrete under fire ................................. 8

2.3 Physical and chemical response to fire . 8

2.4 Spalling . 11

2.4.1 Mechanisms of Spalling .. 12

2.5 Spalling Prevention Measures ... 14

2.5.1 Polypropylene fibers 14

2.5.2 Thermal barriers 15

2.6 Cracking .. 15

��

V

2.7 Effect of Fire on Concrete .. 17

2.8 Performance of reinforcement in fire . 22

2.9 Effect of Fire on Steel Reinforcement ... 22

2.10- Effect of Fire on FRP columns 24

CHAPTER 3. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM

3.1 Introduction 25

3.2 Materials and Their Quality Tests .. 25

3.2.1 Aggregate Quality Tests .... 26

3.2.1.1 Unit Weight of Aggregate .. 26

3.2.1.2 Specific Gravity of Aggregate ... 27

3.2.1.3 Moisture content of Aggregate .. 29

3.2.1.4 Resistance to Degradation by Abrasion & Impaction test .. 29

3.2.1.5 Sieve Analysis of Aggregate .. 31

3.2.1.6 Cement 32

3.2.1.7 Water .. 33

3.2.1.8 Polypropylene Fibers (PP) .. 33

3.3 Mix Proportions .. 34

3.4 Sample Categories .. 35

3.5 Mixing, casting and curing procedures .. 38

3.5.1 Mixing procedures 38

3.5.2 Casting procedures 38

3.5.3 Curing procedures . 39

3.6 Heating Process .. 39

3.7 Compressive and Tensile Strength Tests 41

3.8 Reinforcing Steel Tests .. 42

��

VI

CHAPTER 4. Results & Discussion

4.1 Introduction... 43

4.2 Effect of polypropylene content. 43

4.2.1 Unheated Columns 43

4.2.2 Heated Columns 44

4.3 Effect of concrete cover . 48

4.3 Effect of high temperature on steel reinforcement . 50

4.3.1 Yield Stress . 50

4.3.2-Elongation .. 51

CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Introduction 53

5.2 Conclusions 53

5.3 Recommendations. 54

CHAPTER 6. REFERENCES .

55

ABBENDIX A : RESEARCH PHOTOS . A

��

VII

LIST OF FIGURES

Fig.1.1 Reinforced Concrete Column subjected to Fire "Al Sultan Tower Jabalia..... 2

Fig.2.1 Surface cracking after subjected to high temperatures 7

Fig.2.2 Structural failure.. 7

Fig. 2.3 Concrete in fire physiochemical process.. 9

Fig. 2.4 Spalling in concrete column subjected to fire, Alsultan Tower, Jabalia, North Gaza

Strip 12

Fig. 2.5 The spalling mechanism of concrete cover. 13

Fig. 2.6 Polypropylene fibers provide protection against spalling .. 14

Fig.2.7 Thermal cracks in a concrete column subjected to high temperature 16

F Fig.3.1 Mold of Unit Weight test 27

Fig.3.2 Specific Gravity test equipments 28

Fig. 3.3 Los Angeles Abrasion Machine.. 30

Fig. 3.4 Sieve analysis of aggregate. 32

Fig.3.5 Polypropylene Fibers.. 33

Fig.3.6 Dimension and Reinforcement Details of Samples 35

Fig.3.7 Mechanical mixer .. 38

Fig 3.8 Form of the moulds used for preparing specimens. 38

Fig 3.9 Curing process for hardened concrete 39

Fig 3.10 Electrical Furnace for Burning process... 39

Fig 3.11 Heating process Flow char ............................................. 40

Fig 3.12 Compressive strength Machine .......... 41

Fig 3.13 Tensile strength test for reinforcement steel ...... 42

Fig 4.1 Relationship between axial load capacity and burning periods at 400 C°...... 46

Fig 4.2 Relationship between axial load capacity and burning periods at 600 C°....... 46

��

VIII

Fig 4. 3 Relationship between axial load capacity and burning periods at 800 C°. 47

Fig 4. 4 Relationship between axial load capacity and heating duration at 600 C°

for different concrete covers. 49

Fig 4.� Relationship between yield stress of steel reinforcement and concrete cover

for 800 C° temperature at 6 hrs.. 50

Fig 4.6 Relationship between elongation of steel reinforcement and concrete cover

for 800 C° at 6 hrs . 51

Fig A.1 Mechanical Mixer .. A-1

Fig A.2 Adding of Polypropylene to the mix .. A-1

Fig A.3 Column samples in water ... A-1

Fig A.4 Column samples in the open air.. A-1

Fig A.5 Electrical Furnace... A-2

Fig A.6 Column samples in the electrical Furnace . A-2

Fig A.7 Cracks and Spalling after heating ... A-2

Fig A.8 Compressive Strength test and column samples after test... A-3

Fig A.9 Yield stress test for the steel reinforcement A-4

��

IX

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Mineralogical Composition of Portland Cement 10

Table 3.1 Capacity of Measures...... 26

Table 3.2 Unit weight test results 27

Table 3.3 Specific gravity of aggregate... 28

Table 3.4 Moisture content values.. 29

Table 3.5 Number of steel spheres for each grade of the test sample..................... 30

Table 3.6 Sieve analysis of aggregate. 31

Table 3.7 Ordinary Portland cement properties "Test Results".. 32

Table 3.8 Properties of Polypropylene fibers.. 33

Table 3.9 mix design of the concrete column samples .. 34

Table 3.10 Concrete without PP and cover 2.0 cm... 36

Table 3.11 Concrete with 0.5 Kg/m³ PP and cover 2.0 cm... 36

Table 3.12 Concrete with 0.75 Kg/m³ PP and cover 2.0 cm.... 37

Table 3.13 Concrete with concrete cover 3.0 cm.. 37

Table 3.14 Concrete without PP 37

Table 4.1 The axial load capacity test results for the columns samples

with polypropylene fibers ..........................

44

Table 4.1 Percentage of reduction in axial load capacity at different % of PP,

and different temperatures................................................................

45

Table 4.3 the axial load capacity test results at 600 Cº for 2 cm and

3 cm concrete cover.

48

Table 4.4 Percentages of reduction in axial load capacity at

600 Cº for 2 cm and 3 cm Concrete cover..

48

Table 4.5 the effect of high temperature on yield stress of

steel reinforcement.. 50

Table 4.6 The effect of heating on the elongation of steel reinforcement... 51

��

X

��

LIST OF APPREVIATIONS

RC Reinforced Concrete

PP Polypropylene

°C Degree Celsius

fc

' Compressive Strength of concrete cylinders at 28 days

UTM Universal Testing Machine

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

ACI American Concrete Institute

Unit Weight

Abs. Absorption

FRP Fiber-Reinforced Polymers

C-S-H Hydrated Calcium Silicate

SSD Saturated Surface Dry

S.G Specific Gravity

BSG Bulk Specific Gravity

Wt Weight

OPC Ordinary Portland Cemen

w/c Water cement ratio

C60 Concrete compressive strength of 60 MPa

��

XI

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

INTRODUCTION��

��

��

��

Improving Fire Resistance of CH.1: Introduction Reinforced Concrete Columns��

� � ��

� � ��

�

Introduction

1.1- Introduction

Fire impacts reinforced concrete (RC) members by raising the temperature of the

concrete mass. This rise in temperature dramatically reduces the mechanical

properties of concrete and steel. Moreover, fire temperatures induce new strains,

thermal, and transient creep .They might also result in explosive spalling of surface

pieces of concrete members. Fire is a global disaster in the sense that it disrupts the

normal human activities and leaves behind its scars for some time to come [1].

Concrete is a good fire-resistant material due to its inherent non-combustibility and

poor thermal conductivity. Concrete is specified in buildings and civil engineering

projects for several reasons, sometimes cost, and sometimes speed of construction or

architectural appearance, but one of concretes major inherent benefits is its

performance in fire, which may be overlooked in the race to consider all the factors

affecting design decisions.

Concrete usually performs well in building fires. However, when its subjected to

prolonged fire exposure or unusually high temperatures, concrete can suffer

significant distress. Because concretes pre-fire compressive strength often exceeds

design requirements, a modest strength reduction can be tolerated. But large

temperatures can reduce the compressive strength of concrete so much that the

material retains no useful structural strength [2].

A study of RC columns is important because these are primary load bearing members,

and a column could be crucial for the stability of the entire structure.


� � ��

� � ��

�

1.2- Statement of Problem

During the recent war in the Gaza Strip, the veil uncovered on the extent of disasters

on constructions. It was noted the large scale of destruction resulting from fires which

were either from direct missile hits, or through flammable materials and burning and

flammable (e.g. gasoline) in the residential, and industrial compounds. The Sultan

Tower, located in Jabalia was damaged by burning of flammable materials.

Concrete structures when subjected to fire showed good behavior in general. The low

thermal conductivity of the concrete associated with its great capacity of thermal

insulation of the steel bars is responsible for this good behavior. However a

phenomenon such as the concrete spalling may compromise the fire behavior of the

elements.

Fig.1.1: Reinforced Concrete Column subjected to Fire "Al Sultan Tower Jabalia"


� � ��

� � ��

�

Spalling of concrete leads to a decrease in the cross section area of the concrete

column and thereby decrease the resistances to axial loads, as well as the

reinforcement steel bars become exposed directly to high temperatures.

To avoid spalling phenomenon, several studies have been performed worldwide for

the development of concrete compositions of enhanced fire behavior.

Concretes with polypropylene fibers showed good behavior at elevated temperatures

and controlling spalling of concrete [3].

In this research polypropylene fibers (PP) will be used in the concrete mix in order to

improve the resistance of RC columns to compression loads, and also prevent spalling

of concrete in columns at elevated temperatures. The polypropylene fibers (PP) will

be used in the reinforced concrete columns at different contents (0.5 kg/m³ and 0.75

kg/m³).

Also, different concrete covers are to be used in order to study the effect of concrete

cover on elevated temperatures resistance of reinforced concrete columns.

1.3- Research objectives: ��

The main objective of this research is to increase the fire resistance of reinforced

concrete columns by preventing the spalling phenomenon of concrete.

Access to fire-resistant concrete, especially main structural elements such as concrete

columns through the following:

1. Study the effect of concrete cover on enhancing fire resistance of reinforced

concrete columns.

2. Determine the best amount of polypropylene fibers (pp) to be used in the

concrete mix for improving fire resistance of RC columns to compression

loads.

3. Study the effect of elevated temperature and duration on the mechanical

properties and elongation of the reinforcement steel bars and the effect of

concrete covers of 2 cm and 3 cm.


� � ��

� � ��

�

1.4-Research Methodology: �� 1. Study the available researches related to the subject of the study.

2. Execute a program of tests in laboratories inside and outside the Islamic

University of Gaza.

Testing program will include the following:

Define the properties of constitutive materials of concrete (cement, fine

aggregate, coarse aggregate, steel reinforcement .etc).

Examine the impact of polypropylene fibers (pp) on the reinforced

concrete casting with different contents (0.0 kg/m³, 0.5 kg/m³, and 0.75

kg/m³) of polypropylene fibers.

Heating columns specimens in an electric furnace for different periods

of time (2, 4, and 6 hours), at temperature degrees (400 C°, 600 C° and

800 C°).

3. Tests will be studying the capacity of the reinforced concrete columns under

axial load at materials and soil laboratory in the Islamic University of Gaza.

4. Examination of reinforcement steel bars after exposure to elevated

temperature through the extraction of steel bars from column specimens, then

subjecting those columns to yield stress test and maximum elongation ratio.

5. Test results and data analysis.

6. Conclusions and the recommendations of the research work, based on the

experimental program results and data analysis.


� � ��

� � ��

�

1.5- Thesis Organization

The thesis contains 6 chapters as follows: Thesis Organization

Chapter 1 (Introduction): This chapter gives some background on fire effect on

concrete structures, especially reinforced concrete columns. Also it gives a description

of the research importance, scope, objectives, and methodology, in addition to the

report organization.

Chapter 2 (Literature Review): This chapter reviews a number of studies and

scientific research on the impact of fire on reinforced concrete columns, and ways to

improve the resistance of concrete columns against fire load.

Chapter 3 (Experimental program): determine the basic properties of materials

consisting of concrete, such as" aggregate, sand, cement" , preparation of concrete

columns samples , heating process , and test of samples after heating.

Chapter 4 (Results & Discussion): This chapter discusses the results of the tests that

were performed on reinforced concrete specimens and reinforcement steel bars

samples.

Chapter 5 (Conclusions and Recommendations): This chapter includes the

concluded remarks, main conclusions and recommendations drawn from the research

work.

Chapter 6 (References).

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

LITERATURE REVIEW��

Improving Fire Resistance of CH.2: Literature Review Reinforced Concrete Columns��

� � ��

� � ��

�

��

Literature Review

2.1-Introduction:

Fire remains one of the serious potential risks to most buildings and structures. The

extensive use of concrete as a structural material has led to the need to fully

understand the effect of fire on concrete. Generally concrete is thought to have good

fire resistance. The behavior of reinforced concrete columns under high temperature is

mainly affected by the strength of the concrete, the changes of material property and

explosive spalling.

The hardened concrete is dense, homogeneous and has at least the same engineering

properties and durability as traditional vibrated concrete. However, high temperatures

affect the strength of the concrete by explosive spalling and so affect the integrity of

the concrete structure.

In recent years, many researchers studied the fire behavior of concrete columns. Their

studies included experimental and analytical evaluations for reinforced concrete

columns such as Paulo [3], Shihada [15], Ali [16] and Sideris [22].

This chapter discusses a number of researches and previous studies which were

conducted to study the effect of fire on reinforced concrete columns.

2.2- Concrete

Concrete is a composite material that consists mainly of mineral aggregates bound by

a matrix of hydrated cement paste. The matrix is highly porous and contains a

relatively large amount of free water unless artificially dried. When exposing it to

high temperatures, concrete undergoes changes in its chemical composition, physical

structure and water content. These changes occur primarily in the hardened cement

paste in unsealed conditions. Such changes are reflected by changes in the physical

and the mechanical properties of concrete that are associated with temperature

increase. Deterioration of concrete at high temperatures may appear in two forms:

(1) Local damage (Cracks) in the material itself and Fig (2.1).

(2) Global damage resulting in the failure of the elements Fig (2.2) [4].


� � ��

� � ��

�

Fig. 2.1: Surface cracking after subjected to high temperatures [4].

Fig.2.2: Structural failure [4].

One of the advantages of concrete over other building materials is its inherent fire

resistive properties; however, concrete structures must still be designed for fire

effects. Structural components still must be able to withstand dead and live loads

without collapse even though the rise in temperature causes a decrease in the strength

and modulus of elasticity for concrete and steel reinforcement. In addition, fully

developed fires cause expansion of structural components and the resulting stresses

and strains must be resisted [5].


� � ��

� � ��

�

2.2.1- Benefits of concrete under fire [6].

The benefits of concrete under fire include, but not limited to the following

It does not burn or add to fire load.

It has high resistance to fire; preventing it from spreading thus reduces

resulting environmental pollution.

It does not produce any smoke, toxic gases or drip molten particles.

It reduces the risk of structural collapse.

It provides safe means of escape for occupants and access for firefighters

as it is an effective fire shield.

It is not affected by the water used to put out a fire.

It is easy to repair after a fire and thus helps residents and businesses

recover sooner.

It resists extreme fire conditions, making it ideal for storage facilities with

a high fire load.

2.3- Physical and chemical response to fire

Fires are caused by accidents, energy sources or natural means, but the majority of

fires in buildings are caused by human errors. Once a fire starts and the contents

and/or materials in a building are burning, then the fire spreads via radiation,

convection or conduction with flames reaching temperatures of between 600 Cº and

1200 Cº.

Fig (2.3) illustrates the behavior of reinforced concrete during heating and the degree

of effect at each degree of heating after one hour of exposure on three sides, where the

increasing of temperature degree increases the deterioration of concrete member

Harm is caused by a combination of the effects of smoke and gases, which are emitted

from burning materials, and the effects of flames and high air temperatures [6].


� � ��

� � ��

�

Fig.2.3: concrete in fire physiochemical process for one hour duration [6].

Chemical changes in the structure of concrete can be studied with thermo-

gravimetrical analyses. The following chemical transformations can be observed by

the increase of temperature. At around 100 Cº the weight loss indicates water

evaporation from the micro pores. Dehydration of ettringite

(3CaOAl2O3·3CaSO4·31H2O) occurs between 50 Cº and 110 Cº.The mineralogical

composition of Portland cement shown in Table (2.1).


� � ��

� � ��

��

At 200 Cº further dehydration takes place which causes small weight loss in case of

various moisture contents. The weight loss was different until the local pore water and

the chemically bound water were gone. Further weight loss was not perceptible at

around 250-300 Cº. During heating the endothermic dehydration of Ca (OH)2 occurs

between 450 Cº and 550 Cº (Ca (OH)2 → CaO + H2O. Dehydration of calcium-

silicate-hydrates was found at the temperature of 700 Cº [4].

Table 2.1: Mineralogical Composition of Portland cement.

Some changes in color may also occur during the exposure for temperatures. Between

300 Cº and 600 Cº color is to be light pink, for temperatures between 600 Cº and 900

Cº color is to be light grey, and for temperatures over 900 Cº color is to be dark Beige

"Creamy".

The alterations produced by high temperatures are more evident when the temperature

surpasses 500Cº. Most changes experienced by concrete at this temperature level are

considered irreversible. C-S-H gel, which is the strength giving compound of cement

paste, decomposes further above 600 Cº. At 800 Cº, concrete is usually crumbled and

above 1150 Cº feldspar melts and the other minerals of the cement paste turn into a

glass phase. As a result, severe micro structural changes are induced and concrete

loses its strength and durability.

Concrete is a composite material produced from aggregate, cement, and water.

Therefore, the type and properties of aggregate also play an important role on the

properties of concrete exposed to elevated temperatures.

Mineralogical composition contribution ratio ( % )

C3S (3 CaO . SiO2) 38.95

C2S (2 CaO . SiO2) 30.55

C3A (3 CaO . Al2O3) 9.91

C4AF (4 CaO . Al2O3 . Fe2O3) 11.98


� � ��

� � ��

��

The strength degradations of concretes with different aggregates are not same under

high temperatures.

This is attributed to the mineral structure of the aggregates. Quartz in siliceous

aggregates polymorphically changes at 570 Cº with a volume expansion and

consequent damage.

In limestone aggregate concrete, CaCO3 turns into CaO at 800900 Cº, and expands

with temperature. Shrinkage may also start due to the decomposition of CaCO3 into

CO2 and CaO with volume changes causing destructions. Consequently, elevated

temperatures and fire may cause aesthetic and functional deteriorations to the

buildings.

Aesthetic damage is generally easy to repair while functional impairments are more

profound and may require partial or total repair or replacement, depending on their

severity [7].

2.4- Spalling

One of the most complex and hence poorly understood behavioral characteristics in

the reaction of concrete to high temperatures or fire is the phenomenon of spalling.

This process is often assumed to occur only at high temperatures, yet it has also been

observed in the early stages of a fire, and at temperatures as low as 200 Cº. If severe,

spalling can have a deleterious effect on the strength of reinforced concrete structures;

due to enhanced heating of the steel reinforcement see Fig (2.4).

Spalling may significantly reduce or even eliminate the layer of concrete cover to the

reinforcement bars, thereby exposing the reinforcement to high temperatures, leading

to a reduction of strength of the steel and hence a deterioration of the mechanical

properties of the structure as a whole. Another significant impact of spalling upon the

physical strength of structures occurs via reduction of the cross-section of concrete

available to support the imposed loading, increasing the stress on the remaining areas

of concrete. This can be important, as spalling may manifest itself at relatively low

temperatures, before any other negative effects of heating on the strength of concrete

have taken place [8].


� � ��

� � ��

��

Fig. 2.4. Spalling in concrete column subjected to fire (Alsultan Tower, Jabalia, North Gaza Strip).

2.4.1- Mechanisms of Spalling

Spalling of concrete is generally categorized as: pore pressure induced spalling,

thermal stress induced spalling or a combination of the two.

Spalling of concrete surfaces may have two reasons:

(1) Increased internal vapor pressure (mainly for normal strength concretes) and.

(2) Overloading of concrete compressed zones (mainly for high strength concretes).

The spalling mechanism of concrete cover is visualized in Fig (2.5).


� � ��

� � ��

��

Fig.2.5.The spalling mechanism of concrete covers [4].

As concrete is heated, the free water vaporizes at�100 Cº and expands; thereby

resulting in increased�pore pressures. Migration of some of this vapor to the�interior of

the concrete member, where it cools and�condenses, will result in an increasingly

wet zone�sometimes referred to as moisture clog. At some�distance from the hot

surface the vapor front�reaches a critical point at which a maximum pore�pressure is

achieved (further movement will result in�a reduction in pressure).

The distance of this point�from the heated surface will depend on other concretes

permeability. Pore pressure spalling occurs if�the maximum pore pressure is greater

than the local�tensile strength of the concrete. However, no pore�pressures have yet

been measured which would exceed the tensile strength of concrete which suggests�

that pore pressure in isolation does not lead to the�occurrence of spalling.

Strong thermal gradients develop in concrete as it is�heated, due to its low thermal

conductivity and high�specific heat. These thermal gradients induce compressive

stresses close to the surface due to restrained thermal expansion and tensile stresses in

the�cooler interior regions [9]�


� � ��

� � ��

��

It is most likely that spalling occurs due to the combination of tensile stresses induced

by thermal expansion and increased pore pressure. Much debate�still surrounds the

identification of the key mechanism (pore pressure or thermal stress). However, it is

noted that the key�mechanism may change depending upon the section�size, material

and moisture content [5].

2.5- Spalling Prevention Measures:

There are some principal methods by which the incidence of spalling can be reduced.

2.5.1- Polypropylene fibers

One well-known method is the addition of polypropylene (pp) fibers to the concrete

mix. This approach works on the basis that, as the concrete is heated by fire, the

Polypropylene fibers melt at about 160 Cº - 170 Cº thus creating channels for vapor to

escape and thereby release pore pressures. The influence of compressive load during

heating is important Fig (2.6).

Fig.2.6 Polypropylene fibers provide protection against spalling [10].

Tests have indicated that, for unloaded concrete, 1kg of fibers per m³ of concrete may

be sufficient to eliminate spalling. For a load of 3 N/mm² the fiber content needs to be

increased to 1.5-2 kg/m³ and for a load of 6 N/mm² a further increase to 3 k/m³ may

be required to combat explosive spalling. Although concrete segments are lightly

stressed under normal conditions, it should be pointed out that a circumferential

compressive hoop stress will develop in the concrete during heating which is a

function of the thermal expansion of the aggregate [10].


� � ��

� � ��

��

2.5.2- Thermal barriers

Another anti-spalling measure is to place thermal barrier over the concrete surface a

method sometimes used in tunnel construction. Thermal barriers reduce the rate of

heating (and peak temperatures) within the concrete and thus reduce the risk of

explosive spalling as well as loss of mechanical strength. They are therefore the most

effective method (pp fibers do not reduce temperatures). However, there are two

potential drawbacks: (a) the cost of the insulation is likely to be more than that of the

fibers and (b) with some of the manufacturers there has been a problem with

delaminating during normal service conditions.

The design criteria normally are to apply a sufficient thickness of coating so as to

reduce the maximum temperature at the surface of the concrete to below about 300 Cº

and the maximum temperature at the steel rebar to about 250 Cº within 2- hours of the

fire. It should be noted that experience indicates that while 25 mm of coating may be

adequate for concrete strength up to about C60 a coating thickness of 35mm may be

required for high strength concrete to avoid explosive spalling.

Also, there are some methods as:

1- Spray coating of finished concrete with a substance that slows down the rate of

heat transfer from fire. It is the rate of temperature change in the concrete that has

been proven to be at least as important a cause of spalling as the ongoing exposure

to high temperature itself.

2- The relatively new concept to counter the spalling threat is to provide vents in the

concrete to alleviate pore pressure [9]. �

2.6- Cracking

The processes leading to cracking are generally believed to be similar to those which

generate spalling. Thermal expansion and dehydration of the concrete due to heating

may lead to the formation of fissures in the concrete rather than, or in addition to,

explosive spalling. These fissures may provide pathways for direct heating of the

reinforcement bars, possibly bringing about more thermal stress and further cracking.

Under certain circum stances the cracks may provide path ways for fire to spread

between adjoining compartments Fig (2.7).


� � ��

� � ��

��

The penetration depth of the crack is related to the temperature of the fire, and that

generally the cracks extended quite deep into the concrete member. Major damage

was confined to the surface near to the fire origin, but the nature of cracking and

discoloration of the concrete pointed to the concrete around the reinforcement

reaching 700 °C. Cracks which extended more than 30 mm into the depth of the

structure were attributed to a short heating/cooling cycle due to the fire being

extinguished [11].

The importance of the stress conditions in the concrete should be noted. Compressive

loads which may arise from thermal expansion can be very beneficial in compact the

material and suppressing the formation of cracks; this results in much smaller

degradation of compressive strength and elastic modulus than in specimens bearing

reduced loading [12].

Fig.2.7. Thermal cracks in a concrete column subjected to high temperature [13].


� � ��

� � ��

��

2.7- Effect of Fire on Concrete

Concrete is arguably the most important building material, playing a part in all

building structures. Its virtue is its versatility, i.e. its ability to be molded to take up

the shapes required for the various structural forms. It is also very durable and fire

resistant when specification and construction procedures are correct. Concrete can be

used for all standard buildings both single storey and multistory and for containment

and retaining structures and bridges.

Under normal conditions, most concrete structures are subjected to a range of

temperatures no more severe than that imposed by ambient environmental conditions.

However, there are important cases where these structures may be exposed to much

higher temperatures (e.g., building fires, chemical and metallurgical industrial

applications in which the concrete is in close proximity to furnaces, some nuclear

power-related postulated accident conditions, and buildings that subjected to bombing

and arson).

Concretes thermal properties are more complex than for most materials because not

only is the concrete a composite material whose constituents have different properties,

but its properties also depending on moisture and porosity. Exposure of concrete to

elevated temperature affects its mechanical and physical properties. Elements could

distort and displace, and, under certain conditions, the concrete surfaces could spall

due to the buildup of steam pressure. Because thermally induced dimensional

changes, loss of structural integrity, and release of moisture and gases resulting from

the migration of free water could adversely affect plant operations and safety, a

complete understanding of the behavior of concrete under long-term elevated-

temperature exposure as well as both during and after a thermal excursion resulting

from a postulated design-basis accident condition is essential for reliable design

evaluations and assessments. Because the properties of concrete change with respect

to time and the environment to which it is exposed, an assessment of the effects of

concrete aging is also important in performing safety evaluations. [14]


� � ��

� � ��

��

Paulo et al. [3] presented the results of a research program on the behavior of fiber

reinforced concrete columns under fire. Polypropylene fibers were included in the

concrete in order to enhance the fire behavior of the columns and avoid concrete

spalling. Polypropylene fibers under elevated temperatures will create a network of

micro-channels for the escape of the water vapor and the use of polypropylene in

concrete improves the behavior of the columns in fire. Thus, the use of polypropylene

fibers can control the spalling.

Shihada. [15] Investigated the effect of Polypropylene fibers on fire resistance of

concrete. In order to achieve this, three concrete mixtures are prepared using different

percentages of Polypropylene; 0 %, 0.5 % and 1%, by volume. Out of these mixes,

cubes (100 × 100 × 100 mm) in dimension were cast and cured for 28 days. The cubes

were then burned at 200 C°, 400 C° and 600 C°, for 2, 4 and 6 hours for each of the

three temperatures, and tested for compressive strength. Based on the results of the

experimental program, it is concluded when Polypropylene fibers are used in certain

amounts they improve fire resistance of concrete. Furthermore, it is observed that

concrete mixes prepared using 0.5 %, by volume reserve more than 84 % of the initial

compressive strength when burned at 600 C° for 6 hours. On the other hand, samples

prepared using 0 % Polypropylene reserve about 50 % of their initial strength under

the same temperature and duration.

Ali et al. [16] presented the results of a major research executed on high and normal

strength concrete elements. The parametric study investigated the effect of restraint

degree, loading level and heating rates on the performance of concrete columns

subjected to elevated temperatures with a special attention directed to explosive

spalling. The study included a useful comparison between the performance of high

and normal strength concrete columns in fire.

Using polypropylene fibers in the concrete (3 kg/mᶟ) reduced the degree of spalling

from 22% to less than 1% .Also the study illustrated a method of preventing explosive

spalling using polypropylene fibers in the concrete.


� � ��

� � ��

��

Hodhod et al. [17] investigated the effect of different coating types and thicknesses on

the residual load capacities of reinforced concrete loaded columns when subjected to

symmetrical temperature rise up to 650 C° for 30 minutes. Seventeen RC column

specimens with concrete cover of 1.0 cm and a specimen dimensions (100 mm x150

mm x700 mm) were cast and reinforced with 4Ö6 mm longitudinal reinforcement

bars and 7 Ö 3.5 mm stirrups equally distributed along the length.

Five different types of coating were used in this study; namely traditional-cement

plaster, perlite-cement, vermiculite-cement, LECA-cement and perlitegypsum. Three

different thicknesses of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 cm were used.

Every column specimen was equipped with eight thermocouples to measure the

temperature distributions in side the specimen at mid height. An electric furnace has

been used in this work. Every specimen was exposed to the simultaneous effect of the

axial service load and temperature of 650 Cº for 30-minutes period. The readings of

applied loads and thermocouples were recorded at 5-minuts interval. Testing the

columns after cooling to obtain their residual axial load capacity showed that, perlite

proves to be the most effective plaster in increasing the loaded columns resistance to

elevated temperature. Specimens coated with vermiculite cement came in the second

place. Specimens coated with LECA-cement came in the third place. Finally,

specimens coated with traditional-cement came in the last place.

Hertz and Sørensen. [18] discussed a new material test method for determining

whether or not an actual concrete may suffer from explosive spalling at a specified

moisture level. The method takes into account the effect of stresses from hindered

thermal expansion at the fire-exposed surface. Cylinders are used for testing the

compressive strength. Consequently, the method is quick, cheap and easy to use in

comparison to the alternative of testing full-scale or semi full-scale structures with

correct humidity, load and boundary conditions. A number of concretes have been

studied using this method, and it is concluded that sufficient quantities of

polypropylene fibers of suitable characteristics may prevent spalling of a concrete

even when thermal expansion is restrained.


� � ��

� � ��

��

Jau and Huang. [19] investigated the behavior of corner columns under axial loading,

biaxial bending and a symmetric fire loading. They concluded that, under a

longitudinal stress ratio of 0.10 f`c the residual strength ratios of the columns after fire

loading show:

(a) The 2 and 4 hours fire loadings resulted in residual strength ratios of 67% and

57%, respectively. Compared with unheated columns a 10% reduction on residual

strength results as the duration changes from 2 to 4 hours;

(b) Increasing the thickness of concrete cover caused lower residual strength ratios.

It was also found that the temperature distribution across the cross-section was not

affected by concrete cover thickness. The residual strengths can be used for future

evaluation, repair and strengthening.

Chen et al. [20] investigated the compressive and splitting tensile strengths of

concretes cured for different periods and exposed to high temperatures. The effects of

the duration of curing, maximum temperature and the type of cooling on the strengths

of concrete were also investigated. Experimental results indicated that after exposure

to high temperatures up to 800 C°, early-age concrete that was cured for a certain

period can regain 80% of the compressive strength of the control sample of concrete.

The 3-day-cured early-age concrete was observed to recover the most strength. The

type of cooling also affected the level of recovery of compressive and splitting tensile

strength. For early-age affected concrete, the relative recovered strengths of

specimens cooled by sprayed water were higher than those of specimens cooled in air

when exposed to temperatures below 800 C°, while the changes for 28-day concrete

were the converse. When the maximum temperature exceeded 800 C°, the relative

strength values of all specimens cooled by water spray were lower than those of

specimens cooled in air.


� � ��

� � ��

��

Chen et al. [2] they studied an experimental research on the effect of fire exposure

time on the post-fire behavior of reinforced concrete columns. Nine reinforced

concrete columns (45 mm x 30 mm x 300 mm) with two longitudinal reinforcement

ratios (1.4% and 2.3%) were exposed to fire for 2 and 4 hours with a constant preload.

One month after cooling, the specimens were tested under axial load combined with

uniaxial or biaxial bending. The test results showed that the residual load-bearing

capacity decreased with increasing fire exposure time. This deterioration in strength

which is followed by an increase in fire exposure time can be slowed down by the

strength recovery of hot rolled reinforcing bars after cooling. In addition, the

reduction in residual stiffness was higher than that in ultimate load; consequently,

much attention should be given to the deformation and stress redistribution of the

reinforced concrete buildings subject to earthquakes after afire.

Komonen and Penttala. [21] investigated the effect of high temperature on the

residual properties of plain and polypropylene fiber reinforced Portland cement paste.

Plain Portland cement paste having water/cement ratio of 0.32 was exposed to the

temperatures of 20, 50, 75, 100, 120, 150, 200, 300, 400, 440, 520, 600, 700, 800, and

1000 C°. Paste with polypropylene fibers was exposed to the temperature of 20, 120,

150, 200, 300, 440, 520, and 700 C°. Residual compressive and flexural strengths

were measured. The gradual heating coarsened the pore structure. At 600 C°, the

residual compressive capacity (fc600 C°/fc20 C°) was still over 50% of the original.

Strength loss due to the increase of temperature was not linear. Polypropylene fibers

produced a finer residual capillary pore structure, decreased compressive strengths,

and improved residual flexural strengths at low temperatures. According to the tests, it

seems that exposure temperatures from 50 C° to 120 C° can be as dangerous as

exposure temperatures 400500 C° to the residual strength of cement paste produced

by a low water cement ratio.

Sideris et al. [22 ] studied the mechanical characteristics of Fiber Reinforced Concrete

subjected to high temperatures . Fiber reinforced concrete is produced by addition of

Polypropylene fibers in the mixtures at dosages of 5 kg/m³. At the age of 120 days,

specimens are heated to maximum temperatures of 100, 300, 500 and 700 C°.


� � ��

� � ��

��

Specimens are then allowed to cool in the furnace and tested for compressive strength.

Residual strength is reduced almost linearly up to 700 C°. The study recommended

the use polypropylene fibers as part of a total spalling protection design method in

combination with other materials such as external thermal barriers. Otherwise the

overall thickness of the concrete members should be increased to provide a sacrificial

layer who will be removed after fire in order to efficiently repair the structure

2.8-Performance of reinforcement in fire The performance of steel during a fire is understood to a higher degree than the

performance of concrete, and the strength of steel at a given temperature can be

predicted with reasonable confidence. It is generally held that steel reinforcement bars

need to be protected from exposure to temperatures in excess of 250-300 Cº. This is

due to the fact that steels with low carbon contents are known to exhibit blue

brittleness between 200 and 300 Cº. Concrete and steel exhibit similar thermal

expansion at temperatures up to 400 Cº; however, higher temperatures will result in

significant expansion of the steel com pared to the concrete and, if temperatures of the

order of 700 Cº are attained, the load-bearing capacity of the steel reinforcement will

be reduced to about 20% of its de sign value. Bond failure may be important at high

temperatures, as discussed in section Physical and chemical response to fire.

Reinforcement can also have a significant effect on the transport of water within a

heated concrete member, creating impermeable regions where moisture may become

trapped. This forces the water to flow around the bars, increasing the pore pressure in

some areas of the concrete and therefore potentially enhancing the risk of spalling. On

the other hand, these areas of trapped water also alter the heat flow near the

reinforcement, tending to reduce the temperatures of the internal concrete [8].

2.9- Effect of Fire on Steel Reinforcement

Ünlüoðlu et al. [23] investigated the mechanical properties of steel reinforcement bars

after the exposure to high temperatures. Plain steel, reinforcing steel bars embedded

into mortar and plain mortar specimens were prepared and exposed to 20 C°, 100 C°,

200 C°, 300 C°, 500 C°, 800 C° and 950 C° temperatures for 3 hours individually. A

concrete cover of 25 mm provides protection against high temperatures up to 400 C°.

The high temperature exposed plain steel and the steel with 25-mm cover has the


� � ��

� � ��

��

same characteristics when the reinforcing steel is exposed to a temperature 250 C°

above the exposure temperature of plain steel.

Mamillapalli.[6] investigated the impact of the elevated temperatures on

reinforcement steel bars by heating the bars to 100° C°, 300 C°, 600 C°, 900 C°. The

heated samples were rapidly cooled by quenching in water and normally by air

cooling. The changes in the mechanical properties are studied using universal testing

machine (UTM). The impact of elevated temperature above 900 C° on the

reinforcement bars was observed.

There was significant reduction in ductility when rapidly cooled by quenching. In the

same case when cooled in normal atmospheric conditions the impact of temperature

on ductility was not high.

Topҫu and IºIkdag. [24] investigated the mechanical properties of reinforcement

steel bars after exposure of elevated temperatures. The mortar was prepared with

CEM I 42.5N cement and fired clay. The S 420a, B16 mm ribbed steel bars were used

to prepare (56 x 56 x 290) mm, (76 x 76 x 310) mm, (96 x 96 x 330) mm and (116 x

116 x 350) mm specimens with concrete covers of (20, 30, 40 and 50) mm against

elevated temperatures up to 800 Cº. The reinforcement steel bars were embedded in

mortars, and then specimens were exposed to 20, 100, 200, 300, 500 and 800 Cº

temperatures for 3 hours, individually. After the cooling process, the specimens were

cured for 28 days. The mechanical tests were conducted on cooled specimens, and the

ultimate tensile strength, yield strength and elongation of mortar specimens at various

temperatures were also determined at the end of the experiments. It is observed that a

cover of 20, 30, 40 and 50 mm thickness provides a protection to rebar in exposure of

high temperatures. The cover reduces the losses in yield and tensile strengths of rebar

and ensures 15% higher strength compared to rebar without cover. For temperatures

up to 300 C°, rebar with cover had the same yield and tensile strengths with that of

the rebar without cover in exposure to elevated temperatures. However, when the

temperature increases up to 800 C°, the rebar without cover loses an average of 80%

of its strength capacities compared with a 20% loss for the rebars with cover. It was

observed that 20, 30, 40 and 50 mm cover thickness was not sufficient to protect the

mechanical properties of rebars in exposure of temperatures above 500 C°.


� � ��

� � ��

��

2.10- Effect of Fire on Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) columns

Kodur et al. [25] presented the results of a full-scale fire resistance experiments on

three insulated FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete reinforced concrete columns. A

comparison was made between the fire performances of FRP-strengthened RC

columns and conventional unstrengthened reinforced concrete columns.

Data obtained during the experiments is used to show that the fire behavior of FRP-

wrapped concrete columns incorporating appropriate fire protection systems was as

good as that of unstrengthened RC columns. Thus, satisfactory fire resistance ratings

for FRP-wrapped concrete columns could be obtained by properly incorporating

appropriate fire protection measures into the overall FRP-strengthened structural

systems. Fire endurance criteria and preliminary design recommendations for fire

safety of FRP-strengthened RC columns were also briefly discussed. The performance

of protected FRP-strengthened square RC columns at high temperatures can be

similar to, or better than, that of conventional RC columns.

Chowdhurya et al. [26] demonstrated that fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) could be

used efficiently and safely in strengthening and rehabilitation of reinforced concrete

structures. In there study they were presented the recent results of an experimental

study of the fire performance of FRP-wrapped reinforced concrete circular columns.

The results of fire tests on two columns were presented, one of which was tested

without supplemental fire protection, and one of which was protected by a

supplemental fire protection system applied to the exterior of the FRP-strengthening

system. The primary objective of these tests was to compare fire behavior of the two

FRP-wrapped columns and to investigate the effectiveness of the supplemental

insulation systems.

The thermal and structural behaviors of the two columns were discussed. The results

show that, although FRP systems are sensitive to high temperatures, satisfactory fire

endurance ratings could be achieved for reinforced concrete columns that were

strengthened with FRP systems by providing adequate supplemental fire protection.

In particular, the insulated FRP-strengthened column was able to resist elevated

temperatures during the fire tests for at least 90 minutes longer than the equivalent

uninsulated FRP-strengthened column.

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

EXPIRIMINTAL PROGRAM��

Improving Fire Resistance of CH.3: Experimental Program Reinforced Concrete Columns��

� � ��

� � ��

��

Experimental Program��

3.1- Introduction

The experimental program consists of fire endurance tests. These tests will examine

the effect of high temperatures on reinforced concrete columns and testing their

compressive strength. The program consist of 3 types of small scale reinforced

concrete columns (100 mm x 100 mm x 300 mm) ,one type of specimens is free from

polypropylene and the other two types contain 0.5 kg/m³ and 0.75 kg/m³ of

polypropylene fibers , samples of this group have the same concrete cover (2.0 cm).

The samples will be tested at (ambient temperature, 400 C°, 600 C° and 800 C°) at

(0, 2, 4 and 6 hours) exposure. The other groups have a concrete cover of 3.0 cm and

will be tested at 600 C° for 6 hours to determine the behavior of RC column with

deferent concrete covers at high temperatures.

In addition, the behavior of steel reinforcement under high temperature 800 C°, with

different concrete covers (0 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm) is tested.

3.2-Materials and Their Quality Tests:

It is very important to know the properties and characteristics of constituent materials

of concrete, as we know, concrete is a composite material made up of several different

materials such as aggregate, sand, water, cement and admixture. These materials have

properties and different characteristics such as "Unit weight, Specific gravity, size

gradation and water content ... etc". .

We must therefore work out necessary tests on these components, and that to know

the unique characteristics and their impact on the strength of concrete.

The necessary tests are conducted in the laboratory of materials and soil in the Islamic

University and in accordance with ASTM "American Society for Testing and

Materials".


� � ��

� � ��

��

3.2.1-Aggregate Quality Tests.��

3.2.1.1- Unit Weight of Aggregate:��

Unit weight ( ) can be defined as the weight of a given volume of graded aggregate.

It is thus a measurement and is also known as bulk density, but this alternative term is

similar to bulk specific gravity, which is quite a different quantity, and perhaps is not

a good choice. The unit weight effectively measures the volume that the graded

aggregate will occupy in concrete and includes both the solid aggregate particles and

the voids between them. The unit weight is simply measured by filling a container of

known volume and weighting it based on ASTM C 566 [27].

However, the degree of compaction will change the amount of void space and hence

the value of the unit weight.

Table.3.1: Capacity of Measures

Capacity of

Measure (Liter)

Max.Aggregate��

Size (mm)

2.8 12.5��

9.3 25��

14��37.5��

28 75

The sample shall be in oven dry condition and the capacity of measures are shown in

Table (3.1), the molds of unit weight test for coarse and fine aggregate are shown in

Fig (3.1).


� � ��

� � ��

��

Fig.3.1: Mold of Unit Weight test [IUG-Lab]

The unite weights of coarse and dine aggregate are shown in Table (3.2).

Table 3.2: Unit weight test results��

Dry unit weight 1444.00 kg/ m3��Coarse aggregate

SSD unit weight 1460.4 kg / m3��

Dry unit weight 1440.00 kg/ m3��Fine aggregate sand

SSD unit weight 1445.40 kg / m3�

3.2.1.2- Specific Gravity of Aggregate:

The density of the aggregates is required in mix proportioning to establish weight -

volume relationships. The density is expressed as the specific gravity. Specific gravity

is defined as the ratio of the weight of a unit volume of aggregate to the weight of an

equal volume of water. Specific gravity expresses the density of the solid fraction of

the aggregate in concrete mixes as well as to determine the volume of pores in the

mix.

Specific Gravity (S.G) = (density of solid) / (density of water)


� � ��

� � ��

��

Since densities are determined by displacement in water, specific gravities are

naturally and easily calculated and can be used with any system of units. The specific

gravity tested for coarse and fine aggregate are shown in Fig (3.2).

The specific gravity of aggregate is to determine the volume of aggregates in a

concrete mix as well as to determine the volume of pores in the mix based on ASTM

C127 and ASTM C128 [28,29].

Fig.3.2: Specific Gravity test equipments [IUG-Lab].

The specific gravity of coarse and fine aggregate is shown in Table (3.3).

Table.3.3: Specific gravity of aggregate

Bulk (Gs) SSD 2.63��

Bulk (Gs) dry 2.55 Coarse aggregate

Apparent Bulk (Gs) 2.632

Bulk (Gs) SSD 2.16

Bulk (Gs) dry 2.15 Fine aggregate sand

Apparent Bulk (Gs) 2.17


� � ��

� � ��

��

3.2.1.3- Moisture content of Aggregate: ��

Since aggregates are porous (to some extent), they can absorb moisture. However, this

is a concern for Portland cement concrete because aggregate is generally not dry and

therefore the aggregate moisture content will affect the water content and thus the

water-cement ratio also of the produced Portland cement concrete and the water

content also affects aggregate proportioning (because it contributes to aggregate

weight), based on ASTM C127 and ASTM C128 [28,29].

The moisture content values of coarse and fine aggregate are shown in Table (3.4).

Table.3.4: Moisture content values��

Coarse aggregate 2.8 %

Fine aggregate Sand 0.994 %

3.2.1.4-Resistance to Degradation by Abrasion & Impaction test. ��

The Los Angeles test is a measure of aggregate resulting from a combination of

actions including abrasion, impact, and grinding in a rotating steel drum containing a

specified number of steel spheres. The Los Angeles test has a wide use as an indicator

of aggregate quality, shown in Fig (3.3), based on ASTM C131 [30].

The charge shall consist of steel spheres averaging approximately 46.8 mm in

diameter and each weighing between 390 and 445 g, details are shown in Table (3.5).

Abrasion Loss shall be not more than 50%.


� � ��

� � ��

��

Fig.3.3: Los Angeles test (Abrasion) Machine. [30]

The charge, depending on the grading of the test sample, shall be as follows:

Table.3.5: Number of steel spheres for each grade of the test sample

Grading Number of Spheres Weight of Charge, g

A 12 5000 +/- 25

B 11 4584 +/- 25

C 8 3330 +/- 20

D 6 2500 +/- 15

A 12 5000 +/- 25

% Abrasion Loss = ( Woriginal Wfinal ) / Woriginal * 100

Original weight = 5000 gm

Final weight = 3977.8 gm

Abrasion = (5000 - 3977.8 / 5000) * 100 = 20.44 % < 50 % OK.


� � ��

� � ��

��

3.2.1.5-Sieve Analysis of Aggregate:

The size of aggregate particles differs from aggregate to another, and for the same

aggregate the size is different. So in this test we will determine the particle size

distribution of fine and coarse aggregate by sieving. This method is used to determine

the compliance of the aggregate gradation with specific requirements, ASTM C136

[31].

Table (3.6) and Fig (3.4) illustrate the results of sieve analysis test for coarse and fine

aggregate.

Table 3.6 : sieve analysis of aggregate

SIEVE SIZE Wt. % Retained % Passing

NO. size ( mm ) Retained,(gm)

1.5" 37.5 0 0.00 100.00

1" 25 350 4.71 95.29

3/4" 19 2092.5 28.18 71.82

1/2" 12.5 3122.5 42.05 57.95

3/8" 9.5 3727.5 50.20 49.80

# 4 4.75 4797.5 64.61 35.39

# 10 2 192.3 27.32 27.55

# 16 1.18 293.5 41.69 22.11

# 30 0.6 390.1 55.41 16.90

# 40 0.425 456.9 64.90 13.31

# 50 0.3 492.9 70.01 11.37

# 100 0.125 562.4 79.89 7.63

# 200 0.075 638.5 90.70 3.53

��

��- ASTM C136 maximum and minimum limits for aggregate size distribution .

Sieve 1.5" 1" 3/4" # 4 # 200

Passing 100% 75 - 100 60 - 90 30 - 65 5.0 - 10

��

��


� � ��

� � ��

��

��Sieve Analysis Curve��

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Dia. (mm)

% P

assi

ng

Test Sample

ASTM Min Limit

ASTM Max Limit

��

Fig 3.4 : Sieve Analysis of Aggregate

3.2.1.6-Cement: ��

The cement type which was used for this research is Portland Cement EN 197-1

CEM I 42,5 R & EN 197-1 CEM I 42,5 N " produced in Turkey , and the properties

of cement met the requirement of ASTM C 150 specifications. Table (3.7)

summarizes the properties of this cement [32].

Table.3.7: Ordinary Portland cement properties "Test Results"

No. Description Sample Results Specification ASTM C-150

1- Normal Consistency 27 %

2-

Setting Time

1-Initial Setting (min)

2-Finial Setting (min)

100

165

>45


� � ��

� � ��

��

3.2.1.7-Water: Drinking water was used in all concrete mixtures and in the curing all of the test

samples.

3.2.1.8-Polypropylene Fibers (PP):

Polypropylene is a plastic polymer that was developed in the middle of the 20th

century. Over the years, polypropylene has been used in a number of applications,

most notably as fiber for carpeting and upholstery for furniture and car seats.

Polypropylene has also make an industrial revolution with the plastics industry,

providing an inexpensive material that can be used to create all sorts of plastic

products for the home and office, recently become widely used in the construction

industry, in order to enhance fire resistance concrete. Table (3.8) shows the property

of polypropylene fibers used in this research work, and Fig (3.8) shows the shape of

the used sample.

Table 3.8: Properties of Polypropylene fibers

Fig. 3.5:Polypropylene Fibers

Property Polypropylene Unit weight (kg/m³) 0.9 0.91 Tensile strength (MPa) 400 Fiber Length(mm) 3 - 19 Melting point (Cº) 170-160 Thermal conductivity (w/m/k) 0.12 Density: ( kg/m³) 0.91 kg/m3


� � ��

� � ��

��

3.3- Mix Proportions��

Concrete consists of different ingredients. The ingredients have their different

individual properties. Strength, workability and durability of the concrete depend

heavily on the concrete mix ration of the individual ingredients. Since the process of

concrete formation is a unidirectional chemical reaction, concrete gets its different

properties all together. In this research work, three mixes for different contents of PP

(0 kg/m³, 0.5 kg/m³ and 0.75 kg/m³) were used.

Design Requirements�

1- Characteristic cube concrete strength (cube) fc' 300 kg/cm²

2- Max water cement ratio (w/c) 0.56

3- Minimum cement content 350 kg/m³

4- Max Aggregate Size 3/4" (20mm) crushed limestone aggregate

The following tables (Table 3.9) illustrate the mix design of the column samples.

Table.3.9: mix design of the concrete column samples

��

Weight per one cubic meter kg/m3

Materials Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3

Cement 350�� 350 350

Water 196 196 196

Coarse aggregate 1092�� 1092 1092��

Fine aggregate sand 728 728�� 728

Polypropylene PP�� 0.00 0.5 0.75


� � ��

� � ��

��

3.4-Sample Categories:

All columns samples were fabricated to satisfy the requirements of ACI 211.1 code;

the samples are 100 mm x 100 mm, and 300 mm in dimensions. The main

reinforcement steel bars are 4Ô10 mm, 25 cm in length, and 3 stirrups Ô 6 mm in

diameter Fig (3.6).

The total number of reinforced concrete samples will be 123 samples.

30 c

m

10 cm

Y10 mm

main reinforcement

Y6 mm

For stirrups

Fig.3.6: Dimension and Reinforcement Details of Samples.

The total number of concrete columns samples was 123 samples, and the samples

were categorized and distributed according to the following factors:

1- A mount of polypropylene fibers PP (0 kg/m³, 0.5 kg/m³ and 0.75 kg/m³).

2- According to concrete cover thickness ( 2 cm , 3cm )

3- According to time of heating (0, 2, 4 and 6 hours).

4- According to degree of temperature (0, 400, 600 and 800 Cº).

The following tables (Table.3.10, Table.3.11, Table.3.12, Table.3.13, and Table.3.14)

illustrate the samples categories:


� � ��

� � ��

��

RC Concrete Samples Category

Table.3.10: Concrete without PP and cover 2.0 cm

��

��Temperature Time (hrs) Total��Room Tempt 400 C°��600 C° 800 C°

3 3��0 0 0 0

9 0 3 3 3 2

9 0 3 3 3 4

9 0 3 3 3 6

��

Total No. of samples = 30 ��

Table.3.11: Concrete with 0.5 Kg/m³ PP and cover 2.0 cm

��

��Temperature Time (hrs) Total��Room Tempt 400 C°��600 C° 800 C°

3��3��

0

Improving Fire Resistance ofFaculty of Engineering ŗŪťƈƌƃŒ ŗƒƄƂ Civil Engineering...

Documents

Transcript of Improving Fire Resistance ofFaculty of Engineering ŗŪťƈƌƃŒ ŗƒƄƂ Civil Engineering...