Improvements in exercise performance after surgery for Ebstein anomaly

4
Improvements in exercise performance after surgery for Ebstein anomaly Jan Muller, a Andreas Kuhn, MD, a Manfred Vogt, MD, a Christian Schreiber, MD, b John Hess, MD, FESC, a and Alfred Hager, MD, FESC a Objective: The purpose of this longitudinal study was to assess improvements in exercise performance and quality of life in patients with Ebstein anomaly after surgical intervention. Methods: In 21 patients with Ebstein anomaly (between 6 and 59 years of age; 16 female, 5 male) who under- went surgery for tricuspid regurgitation and, if present, closure of an interatrial shunt, a cardiopulmonary exercise test and a quality-of-life assessment by the Medical Outcomes Study 36 item short form was performed prior to and 6 to 18 months after surgery. Results: After surgery, peak oxygen uptake increased from 68.4% of predicted to 77.3% of predicted (P ¼ .009), and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO 2 slope) improved from 32.5 to 29.3 (P ¼ .001). In 14 patients with additional interatrial shunt closure, oxygen saturation improved from 95% to 99% at rest (P ¼ .003) and from 88% to 99% under peak exercise (P ¼ .003). Improvements in VE/VCO 2 slope were similar in patients who had undergone primary surgery (P ¼ .005) or reoperation (P ¼ .018). Increase in exercise capacity was also similar in both groups but failed significance in both (primary surgery, P ¼ .064; reoperation, P ¼ .063). There was no difference between tricuspid valve repair and replacement in the short-term follow-up. Self-estimated quality of life was fairly good prior to and after surgery. Only in the single question about health transition at follow-up did the patients confirm an improved situation after surgery. Conclusions: Patients with Ebstein anomaly and severe tricuspid regurgitation draw clinical benefit from surgical intervention as measured on exercise testing. This holds true for primary surgery and for reoperation. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:1192-5) Ebstein anomaly is a rare congenital malformation occurring in less than 1% of all cases of congenital heart defects. It is characterized by the downward displacement of the tricuspid valve into the right ventricle, reducing the effective right ven- tricular volume, and by an enlarged redundant anterior leaflet and the adherence of the septal and/or posterior leaflets to the underlying myocardium. Tricuspid regurgitation and right heart failure are the leading clinical findings. Its severity un- derlies the various constellations of tricuspid malforma- tion. 1,2 An interatrial communication is present in 80% to 94% of patients with Ebstein anomaly. 1-3 Most often this is a patent foramen ovale that opens with increased right atrial pressure. At least at exercise, these patients suffer from cyanosis, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance caused by right heart failure and interatrial right-to-left shunting. 4 In Ebstein anomaly, some patients with mild forms live normal lifespans in good condition without surgery. However, many other patients require surgery. The appro- priate time for intervention remains unclear. 5,6 On one hand, early surgery at the age of 12 years or younger is associated with earlier reoperation. 5,7 On the other hand, when functional status deteriorates because of an increase in right-heart size, reduction in systolic function, and/or increasing cyanosis, surgery is urgently indicated to pre- serve right-ventricular function. 1,5 Nowadays, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the key method for assessing functional status. 8 In many centers it is an important element, in addition to echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, in determining the need for surgery. Moreover, CPET is used to assess the benefit of surgical intervention because CPET is a predictor of long-term survival. This has been shown not only in healthy people 8 but also in patients with several other congenital heart defects. 9,10 Improvements in exercise tolerance after surgical inter- vention have been suspected in mainly cross-sectional reports that included only few longitudinal data. 4,11,12 This study aimed to clarify, through a longitudinal study, which patients draw the most clinical benefit from surgery and whether this benefit is associated with an improvement in quality of life. From the Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, a and the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, b Deutsches Herzzentrum Munchen, Tech- nische Universitat Munchen, Germany. Disclosures: Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support. Received for publication April 28, 2010; revisions received July 12, 2010; accepted for publication Aug 30, 2010; available ahead of print Nov 22, 2010. Address for reprints: Jan Muller, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Deutsches Herzzentrum Munchen, Technische Universitat Munchen, Lazarettstrasse 36, D-80636 Munchen, Germany (E-mail: muellerjan@dhm. mhn.de). 0022-5223/$36.00 Copyright Ó 2011 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.083 1192 The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery c May 2011 CHD Congenital Heart Disease Muller et al

Transcript of Improvements in exercise performance after surgery for Ebstein anomaly

CHD

Congenital Heart Disease M€uller et al

Improvements in exercise performance after surgery for Ebsteinanomaly

Jan M€uller,a Andreas K€uhn, MD,a Manfred Vogt, MD,a Christian Schreiber, MD,b John Hess, MD,FESC,a and Alfred Hager, MD, FESCa

From th

Depa

nisch

Disclosu

Receive

for pu

Address

Heart

Lazar

mhn.d

0022-52

Copyrig

doi:10.1

1192

Objective: The purpose of this longitudinal study was to assess improvements in exercise performance andquality of life in patients with Ebstein anomaly after surgical intervention.

Methods: In 21 patients with Ebstein anomaly (between 6 and 59 years of age; 16 female, 5 male) who under-went surgery for tricuspid regurgitation and, if present, closure of an interatrial shunt, a cardiopulmonaryexercise test and a quality-of-life assessment by the Medical Outcomes Study 36 item short form was performedprior to and 6 to 18 months after surgery.

Results: After surgery, peak oxygen uptake increased from 68.4% of predicted to 77.3% of predicted(P ¼ .009), and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) improved from 32.5 to 29.3 (P ¼ .001). In 14 patientswith additional interatrial shunt closure, oxygen saturation improved from 95% to 99% at rest (P ¼ .003)and from 88% to 99% under peak exercise (P¼ .003). Improvements in VE/VCO2 slope were similar in patientswho had undergone primary surgery (P¼ .005) or reoperation (P¼ .018). Increase in exercise capacity was alsosimilar in both groups but failed significance in both (primary surgery, P ¼ .064; reoperation, P ¼ .063). Therewas no difference between tricuspid valve repair and replacement in the short-term follow-up. Self-estimatedquality of life was fairly good prior to and after surgery. Only in the single question about health transition atfollow-up did the patients confirm an improved situation after surgery.

Conclusions: Patients with Ebstein anomaly and severe tricuspid regurgitation draw clinical benefit fromsurgical intervention as measured on exercise testing. This holds true for primary surgery and for reoperation.(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:1192-5)

Ebstein anomaly is a rare congenital malformation occurringin less than 1% of all cases of congenital heart defects. It ischaracterized by the downward displacement of the tricuspidvalve into the right ventricle, reducing the effective right ven-tricular volume, and by an enlarged redundant anterior leafletand the adherence of the septal and/or posterior leaflets to theunderlying myocardium. Tricuspid regurgitation and rightheart failure are the leading clinical findings. Its severity un-derlies the various constellations of tricuspid malforma-tion.1,2 An interatrial communication is present in 80% to94% of patients with Ebstein anomaly.1-3 Most often thisis a patent foramen ovale that opens with increased rightatrial pressure. At least at exercise, these patients sufferfrom cyanosis, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance caused byright heart failure and interatrial right-to-left shunting.4

e Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease,a and the

rtment of Cardiovascular Surgery,b Deutsches Herzzentrum M€unchen, Tech-

e Universit€at M€unchen, Germany.

res: Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support.

d for publication April 28, 2010; revisions received July 12, 2010; accepted

blication Aug 30, 2010; available ahead of print Nov 22, 2010.

for reprints: Jan M€uller, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital

Disease, Deutsches HerzzentrumM€unchen, Technische Universit€at M€unchen,

ettstrasse 36, D-80636 M€unchen, Germany (E-mail: muellerjan@dhm.

e).

23/$36.00

ht � 2011 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.083

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Sur

In Ebstein anomaly, some patients with mild forms livenormal lifespans in good condition without surgery.However, many other patients require surgery. The appro-priate time for intervention remains unclear.5,6 On onehand, early surgery at the age of 12 years or younger isassociated with earlier reoperation.5,7 On the other hand,when functional status deteriorates because of an increasein right-heart size, reduction in systolic function, and/orincreasing cyanosis, surgery is urgently indicated to pre-serve right-ventricular function.1,5

Nowadays, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is thekeymethod for assessing functional status.8 Inmany centersit is an important element, in addition to echocardiographyand magnetic resonance imaging, in determining the needfor surgery. Moreover, CPET is used to assess the benefitof surgical intervention because CPET is a predictor oflong-term survival. This has been shown not only in healthypeople8 but also in patients with several other congenitalheart defects.9,10

Improvements in exercise tolerance after surgical inter-vention have been suspected in mainly cross-sectionalreports that included only few longitudinal data.4,11,12

This study aimed to clarify, through a longitudinal study,which patients draw the most clinical benefit from surgeryand whether this benefit is associated with animprovement in quality of life.

gery c May 2011

Abbreviation and AcronymCPET ¼ cardiopulmonary exercise test

M€uller et al Congenital Heart Disease

CHD

PATIENTS AND METHODSStudy Subjects

BetweenMarch 2002 and October 2009, 21 patients with Ebstein anom-

aly who had undergone surgery were included in the study. They took

a CPET and a quality-of-life assessment prior to surgery and the same

examinations after surgery; the median time interval was 12.4 months

(6.5-17.9 months). Almost all of them had moderate or severe tricuspid re-

gurgitation, both clinically and on echocardiography (Table 1).

Of the 21, 14 underwent primary surgery of the tricuspid valve (group 1).

In 10 of these patients, valve repair was performed; in the other 4, replace-

ment with a biological valvewas performed. In 11 patients with atrial septal

defect or patent foramen ovale, the defect was closed in one session.

Of the other patients, 7 had already undergone a previous surgical inter-

vention for Ebstein anomaly (group 2). In the prior operation all of them

had had repair of the tricuspid valve and closure of the interatrial shunt.

At reoperation, repair of the valve could be achieved in only 2 patients.

In the other 5 patients, the valve was replaced by a biological valve

prosthesis.

The criteria for surgery were moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation;

diminished right ventricular function as seen in magnetic resonance imag-

ing; decrease in exercise capacity; severity of cyanosis; and subjective

perception of well-being. After discussing those criteria carefully with doc-

tors, surgeons, and the patients, a consensus decision was made.

Surgical procedures included several techniques, depending on the sur-

geon’s preference: Alfieri stitch, DeVega annuloplasty, Sebening stitch, or

valve replacement.

The study was done in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki (re-

vision 2008). Patients agreed to the anonymous publication of their data.

Some of the patients had already been included in previous reports from

our group.13,14

Cardiopulmonary Exercise TestAll patients underwent a symptom-limited CPETon a bicycle in upright

position, as previously reported.15

After a 3-minute rest to define baseline, patients had a 3-minutewarmup

without load, followed by a rampwise increase of load with 5, 10, 15, or

20 W per minute, depending on the expected individual physical capacity

estimated by the investigator. The aim was to reach a cycling time of about

8 to 12 minutes after warmup. The end of the CPETwas marked by symp-

tom limitation and was followed by a 5-minute recovery period, with the

first 2 to 3 minutes cycling with minimal load.

TABLE 1. Changes in CPET: Comparing Baseline Testing with Follow-up

Bas

Sex _/\

Age Years 24.5 (1

Tricuspid regurgitation I/II/III/IV 0 / 2 /

RER Peak 1.07 (1

SpO2y (%) Rest 98 (9

Peak 92 (8

Peak VO2 mL/min/kg 21.0 (1

% of predicted 68.4 (5

VE/VCO2 Slope 32.5 (3

CPET, Cardiopulmonary exercise test; RER, respiratory exchange ratio. *2-sided Wilcoxo

The Journal of Thoracic and Car

The exercise test featured a breath-by-breath gas exchange analysis us-

ing a metabolic chart (Vmax 229; SensorMedics, Viasys Healthcare, Yorba

Linda, Calif). Peak oxygen uptake (VO2) was defined as the highest mean

uptake of any 30-second time interval during exercise. Reference values to

compute percentage of prediction were calculated as previously de-

scribed15 by Cooper and Weiler-Ravell16 for children less than 18 years

of age and by Cooper and Store17 for adults. Ventilatory efficiency was dis-

played as a VE/VCO2 slope confined to the linear part of the curve, exclud-

ing values beyond the ventilatory compensation point.

Quality of LifeJust before the exercise test, health-related quality of life was measured

using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form (SF-36), as previ-

ously described.15 It has an acceptable internal consistency and has proven

useful in various medical specialties without any bias for symptoms of

a specific disease. The SF-36 measures 8 health constructs using 8 sub-

scales with 2 to 10 items per subscale and a single-item subscale of health

transition, describing subjective health changes over the past year (36 ques-

tions in all). Some of these subscales represent physical health, whereas

others, such as mental health, refer to real quality of life.

The German version of the self-report form, which has a window of 4

weeks, was used.18 Age- and sex-related reference values were extracted

from the German SF-36 evaluation study.19

Data AnalysesThe data were skewed, so all descriptive data were expressed in median

values and interquartile ranges (Q1-Q3). Nonparametric Wilcoxon tests

were calculated to detect significant differences between parameters at

baseline and after surgical intervention. Afterward, primary operated and

reoperated patients were analyzed separately. The nonparametric Spear-

man correlation was used to find associations between baseline parameters

and changes in CPET parameters that would predict surgical outcome.

All analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 17.0 (SPSS, Inc.,

Chicago, Ill). P values < .05 in a 2-sided analysis were considered

significant.

RESULTSExercise CapacityAt baseline testing, median age was 24.5 years (13.7-43.6

years) and peakVO2 was reduced to 21.0 (17.6-23.5) mL/kg/min, representing 68.4% of predicted values (52.2%-83.3% of predicted values).After surgery, peak VO2 improved significantly (from

68.4% to 77.3%, P ¼ 0.009) as did the VE/VCO2 slope(32.5 to 29.3; P ¼ 0.001) (Table 1). Moreover, oxygen

After Surgical Intervention

eline test Follow-up P values*

5/16 5/16 –

3.7 – 43.6) 26.7 (14.8 – 44.9) –

16 / 3 9 / 10 / 2 / 0 < .001

.03 – 1.13) 1.07 (1.03 – 1.13) .501

5 – 99) 99 (97 – 100) .004

4 – 98) 97 (95 – 100) .010

7.6 – 23.5) 20.7 (18.8 – 27.9) .009

2.2 – 83.3) 77.3 (57.2 – 91.4) .009

0.3 – 43.8) 29.3 (27.8 – 33.1) .001

n test. ySpO2 could be assessed in only 20 patients.

diovascular Surgery c Volume 141, Number 5 1193

TABLE 2. Changes in CPET variables during follow-up by patients undergoing primary surgery and patients being reoperated

Primary surgery (group 1)

n ¼ 14, Median (Q1-Q3)

Reoperation (group 2)

n ¼ 7, Median (Q1-Q3)

Baseline test Follow-up P values* Baseline test Follow-up P values*

Sex _/\ 3/11 2/5 .557yAge Years 18.3 (10.8–46.3) 31.1 (21.1–41.3) .224zTR I/II/III/IV 0/2/11/4 5/8/1/0 .002 0/0/5/2 4/2/1/0 .014

RER Peak 1.04 (1.01–1.09) 1.04 (1.01–1.12) .248 1.12 (1.08–1.23) 1.10 (1.07–1.16) .672

SpO2 (%)x Rest 95 (92–98) 99 (99–100) .003 99 (98–100) 99 (98–100) .279

Peak 88 (78–94) 99 (97–100) .003 99 (98–100) 99 (98–100) .317

peak VO2 mL/min/kg 21.0 (17.8–22.1) 20.3 (18.5–27.8) .059 20.3 (16.4–24.1) 21.3 (18.5–29.5) .091

% predicted 68.8 (51.0–83.0) 77.8 (58.0–92.1) .064 56.4 (53.1–86.7) 73.6 (55.5–92.1) .063

VE/VCO2 Slope 32.3 (30.8–50.5) 29.4 (27.8–32.9) .005 32.5 (30.0–36) 29.3 (26.5–34.5) .018

CPET, Cardiopulmonary exercise test; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; TR, tricuspid regurgitation. *2-sided Wilcoxon test. yChi-squared test comparing the sex distribution of

the 2 subgroups. z2-sided Mann-Whitney-U test comparing the age of the 2 subgroups at baseline test. xSpO2 saturation could be assessed in only 20 patients.

Congenital Heart Disease M€uller et al

CHD

saturation was significantly higher both at rest (P ¼ .004)and at peak exercise (P ¼ .010).

Comparison of subgroups is displayed in Table 2. Onlythe patients who had had primary surgery (group 1) showedimprovement in oxygen saturation both at rest and withpeak exercise. Improvement in the VE/VCO2 slope and exer-cise capacity was similar in both groups after surgery.

Patients with higher VE/VCO2 slopes at baseline testingshowed the greatest improvement in VE/VCO2 slope valuesafter surgery (r ¼ -0.724; P<.001).

Improvements in CPET parameters showed no relation toage, operation method (valve repair or replacement), bodymass, or body height.

Quality of LifeSelf-estimated quality of life was fairly good. On several

scales, the best imaginable result was achieved in many pa-tients both before and after surgery. Only in the dimension ofhealth transition, which asked a single question about healthchanges during the past year, was a significantly better resultreported by the patients who had had surgery (baseline 50[50-75] versus follow-up 75 [50-75]; P ¼ 0.014).

DISCUSSIONOur longitudinal study demonstrates a significant in-

crease in exercise performance after surgery for Ebsteinanomaly. We found a significant increase in peak VO2 andan improvement in ventilatory efficiency depicted asa VE/VCO2 slope after surgery. Moreover, cyanosis waseliminated in patients who underwent primary surgery.

Driscoll and colleagues11 estimated a postoperative exer-cise improvement in peak VO2 of about 25% of predictedrates and the subsequent study by the same group, publishedby MacLellan-Tobert and colleagues,4 found an increase of14% of predicted rates. Additionally, oxygen saturation in-creased sensationally in the postoperative group at rest andunder peak exercise in these 2 studies. However, these stud-ies were cross-sectionally designed. The pre- and postoper-ative group did not include the same subjects, making

1194 The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Sur

statistical analysis limited. Only 4, and in the later report7, patients were tested twice. However, the increase inpeak VO2 of more than 25% of predicted rates and laterthe increase of 14% of predicted rates were drawn fromall subjects included in the study. The later estimation iscloser to our data, showing an increase in peak VO2 ofmore than 9% of predicted rates. The lower increase inour cohort is related to our high baseline value of 68.4%of predicted rates. This high baseline parameter relates toa change in the policy of our institution. Augustin and col-leagues20 related postoperative survival to functional classand right-heart size. They concluded that a deterioratedright ventricle, estimated as New York Heart Association(NYHA) Stadium IV or a cardiothoracic ratio greater than0.65 must be avoided in order to achieve a good postopera-tive outcome. Using that background, it is important to de-termine the right time in decline of exercise capacity andshift from NYHA II to NYHA III to operate so as to preventfurther deterioration. This knowledge changed the opera-tion policy in our institution in 2000; now we send patientsto surgery earlier, and that is reflected by the high baselinevalues and the good clinical outcomes.

A more detailed analysis of our data shows that patientsseem to benefit from surgery in two ways. First, closure ofthe interatrial shunt eliminated hypoxemia in those whounderwent primary surgery (group 1). This shunt closureis expected to increase peak VO2 and to improve ventilatoryefficiency.21 However, improvements in tricuspid andconsecutive right-heart function is another substrate forthe improvement in exercise performance because patientswho had had previous surgery (group 2) showed a similarincrease in exercise capacity and also better ventilatory ef-ficiency after tricuspid valve re-repair or biovalve implanta-tion. The improvements in exercise capacity in the group asa whole were not correlated with previous operation involv-ing closure of or with any other baseline parameters. On thecontrary, persistence of severe tricuspid regurgitation with-out an atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale might ag-gravate right-heart function and cause right-heart failure

gery c May 2011

M€uller et al Congenital Heart Disease

CHD

and syncope at exercise, as is seen in patients with pulmo-nary arterial hypertension without shunt.

Concordant with MacLellan-Tobert and colleagues,4 thesurgical technique (repair or replacement of the tricuspidvalve) had no influence on the surgical outcome in termsof exercise performance. Moreover, and in coherence withDriscoll and colleagues,11 age had no influence on the out-come of exercise performance. Indeed, MacLellan-Tobertand colleagues4 described a benefit in peak VO2 in youngerage groups, both preoperatively and postoperatively. How-ever, this result matches that of the general population,which also shows decreasing exercise capacity with agethat is not an effect of surgery.

Concerning quality of life, the better result in the dimen-sion of health transition proves good postsurgical results interms of exercise; patients rated their health status asimproved over that of a year earlier. However, in the otherdomains, self-estimated quality of life at baseline was fairlygood for most patients, making postoperative improvementdifficult. In the domains of physical roles, bodily pain,social function, and emotional roles, the median resultshad already reached the maximum, leaving no room forimprovement after surgery. In the other domains, only mar-ginal changes were measured. In summary, these divergentfindings based on exercise testing and estimation of qualityof life at baseline emphasize our previously publishedresults—quality of life and even self-estimated physicalfunctioning do not follow actual exercise capacity.13,14

In conclusion, patients with Ebstein anomaly and severetricuspid regurgitation benefit from surgical interventionregarding their exercise performance. This holds true forprimary surgery as well as for reoperations, so there aregood arguments in favor of early surgical repair.

References1. Attenhofer Jost CH, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, Edwards WD, Danielson GK.

Ebstein anomaly. Circulation. 2007;115:277-85.

2. Schreiber C, Cook A, Ho SY, Augustin N, Anderson RH. Morphologic spectrum

of Ebstein malformation: revisitation relative to surgical repair. J Thorac Cardi-

ovasc Surg. 1999;117:148-55.

The Journal of Thoracic and Car

3. Brickner ME, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Congenital heart disease in adults, Part 2.

N Engl J Med. 2000;342:334-42.

4. MacLellan-Tobert SG, Driscoll DJ, Mottram CD, Mahoney DW, Wollan PC,

Danielson GK. Exercise tolerance in patients with Ebstein anomaly. J Am Coll

Cardiol. 1997;29:1615-22.

5. Badiu CC, Schreiber C, Horer J, Ruzicka DJ, Wottke M, Cleuziou J, et al. Early

timing of surgical intervention in patients with Ebstein anomaly predicts superior

long-term outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Aug 18.

6. BrownML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK, Cetta F, Connolly HM,Warnes CA, et al.

The outcomes of operations for 539 patients with Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac

Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1120-36.

7. BrownML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK, Cetta F, Connolly HM,Warnes CA, et al.

Functional status after operation for Ebstein anomaly: the Mayo Clinic experi-

ence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:460-6.

8. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise

capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med.

2002;346:793-801.

9. Diller GP, Dimopoulos K, Okonko D, LiW, Babu-Narayan SV, Broberg CS, et al.

Exercise intolerance in adult congenital heart disease: comparative severity,

correlates, and prognostic implication. Circulation. 2005;112:828-35.

10. Giardini A, Hager A, Lammers AE, Derrick G, Muller J, Diller GP, et al. Venti-

latory efficiency and aerobic capacity predict event-free survival in adults with

atrial repair for complete transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol.

2009;53:1548-55.

11. Driscoll DJ, Mottram CD, Danielson GK. Spectrum of exercise intolerance in 45

patients with Ebstein anomaly and observations on exercise tolerance in 11 pa-

tients after surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:831-6.

12. Barber G, Danielson GK, Heise CT, Driscoll DJ. Cardiorespiratory response to

exercise in Ebstein anomaly. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:509-14.

13. Gratz A, Hess J, Hager A. Self-estimated physical functioning poorly predicts

actual exercise capacity in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease.

Eur Heart J. 2009;30:497-504.

14. Hager A, Hess J. Comparison of health related quality of life with cardiopulmo-

nary exercise testing in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease.

Heart. 2005;91:517-20.

15. M€uller J, Christov F, Schreiber C, Hess J, Hager A. Exercise capacity, quality of

life, and daily activity in the long-term follow-up of patients with univentricular

heart and total cavopulmonary connection. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2915-20.

16. Cooper DM, Weiler-Ravell D. Gas exchange response to exercise in children.

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129:S47-8.

17. Cooper CB, Storer TW. Exercise Testing and Interpretation: A Practical

Approach. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

18. Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health

Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project, International Quality of

Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1359-66.

19. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36, Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand, Han-

danweisung. 1st ed. G€ottingen: Hogrefe; 1998.

20. Augustin N, Schreiber C, Wottke M, Meisner H. [Ebstein anomaly: when should

a patient have operative treatment?]. Herz. 1998;23:287-92.

21. Sun XG, Hansen JE, Oudiz RJ, Wasserman K. Gas exchange detection of

exercise-induced right-to-left shunt in patients with primary pulmonary hyper-

tension. Circulation. 2002;105:54-60.

diovascular Surgery c Volume 141, Number 5 1195