Improved Performance through Higher Standards: Energy Labeling and MEPS; the Tunisian experience...
Transcript of Improved Performance through Higher Standards: Energy Labeling and MEPS; the Tunisian experience...
Improved Performance through Higher Standards: Energy Labeling
and MEPS;the Tunisian experience
Presentation by:Fethi HANCHIDirector - Division of Rational Utilization of Energy
National Agency for Energy Conservation
Contents
1. The energy supply & demand background
2. Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
3. Main Results
4. Success Factors & Lessons Learned
Energy supply & demand background
1980 1990 2000 2012-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Evolution of Energy Balance (ktoe)
Surplus Deficit
2012 1635 ktoe
Since 2000, Tunisia has become a net energy importer.
In 2012, the energy independence ratio was approximately 80% with a deficit of 1.6 Million toe.
This is mainly due to the decrease of the resources and the rapid growth in demand
the energy deficit is dominated by natural gas (75%).
This energy is the main source of electricity generation.
Energy supply & demand background
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20131500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Evolution of Capacity installed and Peak load (MW)
Electricity Generated Capacity Peak load
Rapid growth of the peak load that generates increasing needs of investment in electricity generation capacity
Energy supply & demand background
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012250
500
750
1000
301
408
536
591
732
491
665
876
993
Primary Energy Cost (TND/toe)
From 2004 to 2012, the share of energy expenditure in GDP has increased from 5% to 14%!!
Energy supply & demand background
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
-0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
203
414500 450
806
430550
1536
2111
0.5%
1.0% 1.1%0.9%
1.5%
0.7%0.9%
2.4%
3.0%
Evolution of Energy subsidies and its share in GDP
Subvention à l'énergie Part de la subvention dans le PIB
Subsid
ies (
million o
f TN
D)
Share
in G
DP
(%
)
2004-2012
7000 Million TND
Energy Subsidies has put tremendous budgetary pressure on government.
From 2004 to 2012, Energy Subsidies has increased from 0,5% to 3% Of GDP!
Energy supply & demand background
2010 2011 2012 20130
50
100
150
200
250
300
Share of subsidy in electricity cost(TND/kwh)
Subsidy
Average selling price
31%
39%
49%
40%
Electricity is among the most heavily subsidized energy.
In 2012 the share of the subsidy was 49% of electricity cost. In other words, the State shares the cost of kWh with the consumer.
Energy supply & demand background
Increase of housing electricity consumption about 60% in 10 years
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112000
2700
3400
4100
Evolution of Bulding Electricity Consumption (GWh)
TertiairyHousing
10 years60%
Energy supply & demand backgroundRefrigerator, TV and lighting are the most energy-consuming equipments with a total share of 79%
The consumption of AC equipment s is not significant but its contribution to the peak load is very important.
Refrigerator38%
TV23%
Lighting18%
AC4%
WM3%
Others14%
Structure of Electricity housing consumption
x1000 2004 2009annual growth
rate
household equipment
rate
Lighting 14716 17118 3,3% 100%
TV 2279 2708 3,8% 96%
Refrigerator 1982 2364 3,9% 92%
AC 202 437 23,2% 15%
WM 373 780 21,9% 50%
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Feasibility StudyInstitutional and
Capability Building
Implementation and Promotion
Monitoring & Evaluation
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Production and consumption analysis and study of prioritization of products for labeling.
International best practices and experiences study. Assessing the capacity to develop and implement a labeling program,
including: Labeling programs policies and regulation; Standards/specifications; Stakeholders requirements and market needs; Institutional and relevant agencies preparation; Resources and capabilities, including funds, human resources, local
manufacturing and testing facilities.
Feasibility Study 1996-2000
ANME (Cordination, monitoring & Evaluation)Ministry of Trade
(Manufacturers, Importers &
Retailers
Ministry of Industry
(Manufacturers)
INNORPI (Norms and Standards )
CETIME (Testing
facilities)
FEDELEC (Professional organization,
communication, information);
ODC (Consumer rights
Organization; NGO);
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Institutional and Capacity Building
Identification of national execution and implementation agencies &
organizations
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation of testing facilities (CETIME) :
Refrigerator 2002; AC equipement2008; Lighting2010;
Testing protocol (INNORPI); Training (all Stakeholders); Conducting pilot tests (60 refrigeration
equipments, 50 AC equipments). Refrigerator 60 equipments; AC 50 equipments;
Institutional and Capacity Building Develop testing capacity
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Energy Conservation Law (2004) : Refrigerator 2004; AC equipement2009; Lighting being promulgated; WM in development;
Implementation and Promotion Implementation
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion Implementation
Training & information dissemination: Manufacturers, importers; Retailers support; Trade inspectors;
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion MEPS
12345678 XX
XXX
07/2006
07/2007
04/2009
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion
MEPS (Minimum Energy Performance Standards)
12345678 XX
XXX
01/2010
01/201101/2012
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Awareness & communication campaign :
All media (TV, radio, newspapers)
Mailing Flyers, Posters Field campaigns Meetings, seminars and
exhibitions
Implementation and Promotion Promotion
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Labeling process monitoring
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision Monitoring
Manufacturers importers
CETIME (testing)ANME
(Labeling Levels)
Retailers
Ministry of Trade
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Labeling performance monitoring including display label quality, number of applications / manufacturers, number of products models / types and production / sale number of labeled products.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision Monitoring
2009 2010 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
60%
17%
25%
78%
26%
48%
Share of equipement without label
Refrigerator
AC equipement
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision Evaluation
Market evaluation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
AC Equipment
2006 2013
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Refrigerator
2003 2007
2013
2003 2007 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Refrigerator
Class8Class7Class6Class5Class4Class3Class2Class1
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision Evaluation
Market evaluation
2009 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AC Equimpent
Class8Class7Class6Class5Class4Class3Class2Class1
10%
46%
100%
18%
100%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Energy Saving Result (ktoe)
Refrigertor AC Equipment
Main results
218 ktoe
• Energy Saving
125 MTND
• Cost Saving
46 MTND
• Subsidy Saving
Success Factors & Lessons Learned
A participatory multi-stakeholder approach is the most effective way of insuring the success of the strategy elaboration and implementation
Control and market monitoring is an essential action to win consumer trust: Ministry of Trade have conducted in 2013 a large campaign of market surveillance to verify conformity of products tested against products marketed
Communication is a powerful tool to promote high performance and efficient technologies: ANME is developing a new communication strategy to promote Energy Labeling Programs
Governments must create a win - win situation between the state and the consumer: ANME is developing a mechanism to promote 1 million high performance refrigerators (600.000 replacement & 400.000 new acquisition)