Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36...

15
Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne disease risk (Ecology NOT modelling) Dr Jolyon Medlock Head of Medical Entomology Public Health England Porton Down

Transcript of Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36...

Page 1: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

Importance of land cover in

determining vector-borne disease risk

(Ecology NOT modelling)

Dr Jolyon Medlock

Head of Medical Entomology

Public Health England

Porton Down

Page 2: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

The ecology of disease vectors

• Ticks & Borrelia (Lyme disease)

• Urban disease ecology

• Mapping and predicting rare tick species

• Imported ticks and host habitat suitability

• British mosquitoes and wetlands

• Culex modestus and West Nile virus

• Invasive mosquitoes and “human habitats”

2 Overview

Page 3: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

Ixodes ricinus ticks

• Can we create a suitability map for Ixodes ricinus ticks (and

hence Lyme risk)?

• Life in the “leaf litter”, OR life in the “ecotone”

• Spend most of time (90%) in the soil/litter

• Lose moisture easily

• Need to keep moisture up – needs to be humid

• Less active when very hot or very cold temps – like mild winters

• Spends most of the year alternating between leaf litter and tips of

vegetation (returning to actively rehydrate)

• Opportunities for “questing”

• Two key requirements for I. ricinus survival

• Moist microclimate / high humidity for survival off the host

• Available hosts for blood-feeding

3 Habitat suitability for Ixodes ricinus ticks

Page 4: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

4 Understanding tick and Lyme hot spots at a local level – developing management strategies

National

Regional

Habitat management Urban greenspace & LA management

Page 5: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

5

Mapping Borrelia infection rates in ticks

across a landscape – South Wiltshire

- Heterogeneity of infection rates

- Impact of habitats and hosts

- Differences in genospecies rates

Understanding ecological drivers of Borrelia burgdorferi – heterogeneity of prevalence at a regional scale

Wiltshire tick abundance

Wiltshire sites

Alv

edis

ton

Chic

kla

de

Chold

ert

on

Donheads

East

Knoyl

e

Farl

ey

Fovant

Gutc

h C

om

mon

Hin

don

Pitto

n

Pyt

house

West

Knoyl

e

Win

Gre

en

Win

ters

low

Bow

erc

halk

e

Charl

ton A

S

Coom

be B

issett

Deanla

nd

Gro

vely

East

Sto

ckto

n

Sutt

on M

andevill

e

Yarn

bury

Pepperb

ox

Burc

om

be

Gre

at

Durn

ford

Gro

vely

West

Ham

ptw

ort

h

Langle

y

Redly

nch

Whitepari

sh

Wilt

on

Woodfo

rd

Bentley

Buxbury

Chilm

ark

Fig

sbury

Ward

our

Wyl

ye

Mean n

o t

icks/5

m2

0

20

40

75

80

Ticks / 5m2

Page 6: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

Classifying woodland type, structure and

connectivity in relation to tick suitability

6 Heterogeneity of Borrelia prevalence across a landscape

SPRING AUTUMN

Ecological considerations in mapping tick habitats

• Not all woodland is equal, some types are more

important than others (for ticks).

• Paths on the edge of woodland can present a high

rate of exposure to humans

• Woodland size and connectivity – does it matter?

• Impact of game bird stocking?

• Habitat suitability for deer?

• Grazing routine ofgrasslands?

• Degree of scrub on grassland

Page 7: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

- Host seasonal dynamics

- Seasonal changes in tick infestation rates

- Seasonal changes in tick infection rates

- Differences in Borrelia genospecies cycles

HUMAN

Low probability

of infection

Source of infection,

More conspicuous

Low no. lower risk

Source of infection,

Less conspicuous

High no., High risk

- Seasonal activity of

Questing tick stages

- Tick prevalence rates

- Seasonal behaviour

of humans, hence exposure

Lyme borreliosis

Transmission cycle

Trans-ovarial transmission very low: <2%

NYMPHS

moult

moult

ADULT FEMALE

LARVAE

Large mammals: - Deer species - Sheep Not generally involved in transmission cycles; localised transmission through co-feeding in sheep reported; both important tick hosts

Feed

Blood host

Feed & infect Trans-stadial

transmission Woodland birds: - T. merula - E. rubecula - P. colchicus Medium-sized mammals: - Sc. carolinensis - Le. europaeus

Feed & infect

Acquire infection

Trans-stadial

transmission

Feed

Acquire infection

Small mammals: - Ap. sylvestris - Ap. flavicollis - My. glareolus - S. araneus - M. agrestis

Page 8: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

Ticks & Lyme disease in urban green space

8 Ticks in urban green space

Salisbury City tick abundance

Locations

Sa

rum

Dow

n

Sa

rum

tra

ck

Str

atf

ord

Mill

Hud

so

n's

Fie

ld

Castle

Hill

Harn

ha

m C

ha

lk

Harn

ha

m R

ive

rsid

e

Harn

ha

m S

lop

e

Harn

ha

m S

tep

s

Bri

tfo

rd F

arm

Ham

pto

n P

ark

Be

me

rto

n H

ea

th

Be

me

rto

n R

ive

rsid

e

Qu

idh

am

pto

n W

oo

d

Be

me

rto

n W

ate

r M

ea

do

ws

Bis

ho

pd

ow

n P

ark

Bis

ho

pd

ow

n R

ailw

ay

Bu

rrou

gh

's H

ill

La

ve

rsto

ck D

ow

n

Chu

rch

Roa

d

Avo

n V

alle

y

Sp

ort

s C

en

tre

Wyn

dh

am

Pa

rk

Chu

rch

ill G

ard

en

s

Tic

k a

bu

nd

an

ce

0

10

40

Potential conflicts between infectious disease health

risk and biodiversity goals:

Need to include “vector risk assessment” in

Environmental Impact Assessments

up to 30%

prevalence of B.

burgdorferi

Example of peri-urban tick & Borrelia area

Page 9: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

9 Urban ticks in Bath

Site

ID Habitat

Transect

(5m)

Total

nymphs

collected

Total

nymphs

per 10m2

Nymphs

tested/positive

(% positive for

Borrelia)

Females

tested/positive

(% positive for

Borrelia)

Total ticks

tested/positive

(% positive

for Borrelia)

1 Grassland 61 11 0.36 0/11 (0) 1/5 (20) 1/16 (6.3)

2 Woodland 60 6 0.20 0/6 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/6 (0)

3 Woodland 60 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

4 Grassland 60 14 0.47 0/14 (0) 3/8 (37.5) 3/22 (13.6)

5 Woodland edge 33 54 3.27 2/54 (3.7) 0/2 (0) 2/56 (3.6)

6 Woodland 45 14 0.62 1/13 (7.7) 0/2 (0) 1/15 (6.7)

7 Park 60 5 0.17 0/5 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/5 (0)

8 Woodland 60 6 0.20 0/6 (0) 0/2 (0) 0/8 (0)

9 Grassland 60 3 0.10 0/3 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/3 (0)

10 Woodland 63 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

11 Park 66 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

12 Park 60 2 0.07 0/2 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/2 (0)

13 Woodland 60 31 1.03 0/29 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/29 (0)

14 Grassland 61 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

15 Park 61 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

16 Park 61 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

17 Woodland edge 30 116 7.73 2/117 (1.7) 0/4 (0) 2/121 (1.7)

18 Woodland edge 61 49 1.61 1/53 (1.9) 0/0 (0) 1/53 (1.9)

19 Grassland 60 3 0.10 0/3 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/3 (0)

20 Park 60 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

21 Woodland edge 60 2 0.07 0/1 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/1 (0)

22 Grassland 62 0 0.00 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/0 (0)

23 Grassland 60 1 0.03 0/1 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/1 (0)

24 Grassland 62 19 0.61 0/10 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/10 (0)

25 Grassland 60 2 0.07 0/2 (0) 0/0 (0) 0/2 (0)

26 Grassland 59 30 1.02 3/30 (10) 0/1 (0) 3/31 (9.7)

27 Woodland 64 57 1.78 6/53 (11.3) 2/7 (28.6) 8/60 (13.3)

Page 10: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

Can we map rare tick species

with limited data? – canine babesiosis

10 Using land cover to predict other sites with Dermacentor reticulatus

How good are livestock maps?

Is there a “dog walking” layer in GIS?

Page 11: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

11 Unusual & Imported ticks

Hyalomma

marginatum Combining climate suitability maps for imported

ticks from migratory birds AND

Breeding bird data – where do the wheatears

spend the summer?

Page 12: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

12

Wetland creation, expansion and

management – impact on

mosquitoes

Land cover & mosquitoes

- Not all mosquitoes adopt

the same life history

- Dependent on wetland

type, groundwater levels,

management and tides

Week16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

Me

an

ad

ult a

bu

nd

an

ce

pe

r n

igh

t

0

100

200

300

400

500

Cq. richiardii

Oc. punctor

Oc. cantans

Oc. rusticus

Cs. annulata

Other

Wet woodland

Week

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42

Me

an

ad

ult a

bu

nd

an

ce

pe

r n

igh

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

Ae. cinereus

An. claviger

Cs. annulata

Cq. richiardii

Oc. cantans

Oc. rusticus

Other

Fen & ditch

Week

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42

Mean a

dult a

bundance p

er

nig

ht

0

100

200

300

400

500

Ae. cinereus

An. claviger

Cs. annulata

Cq. richiardii

Oc. cantans

Oc. caspius

Other

Reedbed

Week

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40

Me

an

ad

ult a

bu

nd

an

ce

pe

r n

igh

t

0

50

100

150

200

250

Ae. cinereus

An. claviger

Cs. annulata

Cq. richiardii

Oc. caspius

Other

Flooded grassland

Week

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

Me

an

ad

ult a

bu

nd

an

ce

pe

r n

igh

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Ae. cinereus

An. claviger

Cs. annulata

Cq. richiardii

Oc. caspius

Oc. cantans

Oc. rusticus

Other

Grassland

Arable

Week

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36M

ea

n a

dult a

bun

da

nce p

er

nig

ht

0

20

40

60

80

100

Cs. annulata

Cq. richiardii

Oc. cantans

Oc. caspius

Oc. rusticus

Other

Page 13: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

West Nile virus &

Culex mosquitoes

13 Mapping West Nile virus risk

How long has Culex modestus been in England?

Where else should we be looking?

Page 14: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

14 Invasive mosquitoes (Photos: Francis Schaffner)

Invasive mosquitoes in

continental Europe

- Vectors of dengue,

chikungunya and Zika

Land cover and Aedes

albopictus/aegypti

Can we use satellite data to generate a

map of urban habitats for invasive

mosquitoes?

Or used tyre dumps?

Page 15: Importance of land cover in determining vector-borne ... · Week 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 ht 0 100 200 300 400 500 Cq. richiardii Oc. punctor Oc. cantans Oc. rusticus Cs.

The ecology of disease vectors

• Ticks and mosquitoes are impacted by land

cover – so we should be able to map their

suitability….

15 Final conclusions

• We may also need to map….

…..their hosts, the connectivity of their

habitats, consider soil type, geology, aspect,

elevation, hydrology (groundwater), habitat

and water level management, microclimate…..

• Can we used to predict risk, inform RA,

advice the public and direct surveillance