Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

23
Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies Academic Senate for the California Community Colleges Spring Plenary; April 18, 2008 Dave Degroot, Alan Hancock College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

description

Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies. Dave Degroot, Alan Hancock College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College. Academic Senate for the California Community Colleges Spring Plenary; April 18, 2008. Overview. Past AP Resolution Summary Why AP ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Page 1: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Academic Senate for the California Community Colleges Spring Plenary;

April 18, 2008

Dave Degroot, Alan Hancock CollegeMichelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Page 2: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

OverviewOverview

• Past AP Resolution Summary • Why AP?• AP Equivalencies for General

Education • AP Equivalencies for Courses• Conclusions and questions

Page 3: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Spring, 2005Spring, 2005

• 9.03 Application of Advanced Placement (AP) scores

• “Resolved, That the ASCCC investigate the feasibility of establishing statewide standards to be used for the application of AP credits in each California community college.”

Page 4: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Fall, 2006 Fall, 2006

• 4.02 Advanced Placement (AP) Credit Policies• We strongly recommend that local senates research the

practices used… for awarding AP credit to be sure that the process is driven by faculty, benefits students, and is inclusive of all disciplines faculty deem appropriate for the application of AP credit; and

• We review research on AP credit policies and procedures conducted by local senates and develop a best practices paper.

Page 5: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Fall, 2006Fall, 2006

• 4.06 Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalency Lists

• We strongly recommend that the CSU and UC system offices work with their academic senates to identify GE areas and major prep patterns deemed appropriate for the application of AP credit; and

• We urge ICAS to study the wide variance among community colleges and universities in the awarding of AP credit and make recommendations for local senates to consider.

Page 6: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Spring, 2007Spring, 2007

• 9.06 Researching AP Uses and Cut Scores • Work with our ICAS partners to:

• Ensure that intersegmental discipline faculty review the AP cut scores and applicability for their disciplines;

• Ensure that adequate time is given for research to be conducted for determining the most appropriate cut scores prior to any formal revision and subsequent adoption of the ten-year old matrix; and

Page 7: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Spring, 2007Spring, 2007

• 9.06 Researching AP Uses and Cut Scores

• Work with our ICAS partners to:• Clarify how AP exam scores are applied to

grant unit and/or subject credit for purposes that vary among segments, with the goal of achieving similarity in standards across our institutions and for our students.

Page 8: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

“But we’re community college faculty. Why are we discussing

AP?”

“But we’re community college faculty. Why are we discussing

AP?”

In the last few years, the number of high school students taking AP courses has ballooned — 1.2 million, or 21 percent, of students in the Class of 2004 took at least one.

Epstein, David. A New AP, Inside Higher Education. May 26, 2005.

Page 9: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Spring 2008 ResolutionsSpring 2008 Resolutions

• Standardized Template for Advanced Placement Exam Information

• Standardized Procedures for Determining Advanced Placement Exam Equivalencies

• CCC GE Advance Placement (AP) Equivalency

Page 10: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

What is Advanced Placement?

What is Advanced Placement?

• HS students complete courses in high school and take an AP exam.

• CCC’s may choose to accept AP scores or not.• AP Exam grades are reported on a 5-point

scale:5 Extremely well qualified4 Well qualified3 Qualified2 Possibly qualified1 No recommendation

Page 11: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Why should CCCs give credit for AP?Why should CCCs give credit for AP?

• Parents and students expect it• Allows students to progress to the

next level of coursework • GE AP Equivalencies have been

established for IGETC and CSU GE

Page 12: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Why should CCCs give credit for AP?Why should CCCs give credit for AP?

• College faculty serve on standard-setting committees and participate in the grading of AP exams.

• College faculty serve on the committees that develop AP course descriptors and exams

• AP courses and exams are updated regularly based on feedback from up to 200 colleges and universities.

Page 13: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Why should CCCs give credit for AP?Why should CCCs give credit for AP?

•Why not?

Page 14: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

AP EquivalenciesAP Equivalencies

• Two different kinds of AP equivalencies:GE “Area” Equivalency“Course” Equivalency

• Two different things – equivalency criteria is different

• Example: AP English Language and Composition

Page 15: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Faculty ResponsibilityFaculty Responsibility

• Faculty determine AP credit standards

• Consider implications*• Become familiar with tests

and local curricula• Conduct local research

Page 16: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Faculty ResponsibilityFaculty Responsibility

• Discipline faculty make recommendations

• Discuss with local curriculum committee and Senate

• Disseminate and publish information widely

Page 17: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

AP Credit Implications: Different AP Credit

Applications

AP Credit Implications: Different AP Credit

Applications

• Examine similarities and differences between CSU GE/IGETC/AA-AS GE and local major requirements

• Assess impact on course-to-course articulation agreements

• Use tools that support and inform faculty decisions

“Ensure access without compromising on integrity.”

Page 18: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

AP Tools to Support FacultyAP Tools to Support Faculty

The College Board recommends that faculty….

1. Understand what an AP Exam grade represents;

2. Use data on the performance of AP students in college;

3. Base our policy on external recommendations;

4. Review AP curricula and AP exams.

Page 19: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

AP Tools to Support FacultyAP Tools to Support Faculty

For more information, access: http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/colleges/setting_policy/index.html

The College Board provides detailed descriptions of every AP course at:

http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/courses/descriptions/index.html

Page 20: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Best Practices for Establishing Credit Policies

Best Practices for Establishing Credit Policies

• Is the time right for a “best practices” paper?

• Involve discipline faculty, articulation officers, transfer counselors in process.

• Evaluate AP exams and curricula.

Page 21: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Best Practices for Establishing Credit Policies

Best Practices for Establishing Credit Policies

• Explore impact on local and transfer students.

• Publish AP credit policies in catalog.

• Benefits and drawbacks of a statewide CCC AA/AS GE AP credit policy?

Page 22: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Determining Minimum AP Credit LevelsDetermining Minimum AP Credit Levels

In a comprehensive study of AP practices, William Lichten of Yale University documents that the more selective the university in terms of admissions, the more likely that it requires a score of 4 or higher for advance credit. According to Lichten, around the nation, only 45 percent of colleges and universities currently allow credit for a score of 3 or lower, and that percentage is falling.

Whither Advanced Placement? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8.29, June, 2000.

Page 23: Implementing Systemwide Advanced Placement (AP) Equivalencies

Establishing Minimum Standards: Minimum Acceptable Scores May Vary by

Subject

Establishing Minimum Standards: Minimum Acceptable Scores May Vary by

Subject

Seton Hall University restricted the acceptable AP cutoff

scores to 4 and 5 a few years ago when we realized that the score of 3 did not guarantee an acceptably high level of achievement. While Seton Hall has recently entered the ranks of Tier II institutions, it doesn't pretend to be Princeton or Williams. The point is that even a somewhat less competitive school like ours felt the need to raise the bar because those students with 3's looked pretty much like the rest of the College English I students.

Ed JonesAssistant Professor of English

Seton Hall University