Implementing Quality on Java projects

40
27 au 29 mars 2013 Implementing Quality on Java projects Vincent Massol Committer XWiki XWiki SAS @vmassol Sunday, March 31, 13

description

Gives 5 hands on tips on how to improve a specific aspect of Quality on Java projects

Transcript of Implementing Quality on Java projects

Page 1: Implementing Quality on Java projects

27 au 29 mars 2013

Implementing Quality on Java projects

Vincent MassolCommitter XWiki

XWiki SAS

@vmassol

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 2: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Vincent Massol

• Speaker Bio

• CTO XWiki SAS

• Your Projects

• XWiki (community-driven open source project)

• Past: Maven, Apache Cargo, Apache Cactus, Pattern Testing

• Other Credentials:

• LesCastCodeurs podcast

• Creator of OSSGTP open source group in Paris

• 3 books: JUnit in Action, Maven: A Developer’s Notebook, BBWM

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 3: Implementing Quality on Java projects

What is Quality?

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 4: Implementing Quality on Java projects

The XWiki project in summary

• 9 years old

• 28 active committers

• 7 committers do 80% of work

• 700K NCLOC

• 11 commits/day

• 16 mails/day

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 5: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Examples of Quality actions

• Coding rules (Checkstyle, ...)

• Test coverage

• Track bugs

• Don’t use Commons Lang 2.x

• Use SLF4J and don’t draw Log4J/JCL in dependencies

• Automated build

• Automated unit tests

• Stable automated functional tests

• Ensure API stability

• Code reviews

• License header checks

• Release with Java 6

• Ensure javadoc exist

• Prevent JAR hell

• Release often (every 2 weeks)

• Collaborative design

• Test on supported environments (DB & Browsers)

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 6: Implementing Quality on Java projects

27 au 29 mars 2013

Quality Tip #1

API Stability

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 7: Implementing Quality on Java projects

The Problem

Class Not Found or Method Not Found

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 8: Implementing Quality on Java projects

API Stability - Deprecations

/** * ... * @deprecated since 2.4M1 use {@link #transform( * Block, TransformationContext)} */@Deprecatedvoid transform(XDOM dom, Syntax syntax) throws TransformationException;

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 9: Implementing Quality on Java projects

API Stability - CLIRR (1/2)<plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>clirr-maven-plugin</artifactId> <configuration> <ignored> <difference> <differenceType>7006</differenceType> <className>org/xwiki/.../MetaDataBlock</className> <method>org.xwiki....block.Block clone()</method> <to>org.xwiki.rendering.block.MetaDataBlock</to> <justification>XDOM#clone() doesn't clone the meta data</justification> </difference>...

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 10: Implementing Quality on Java projects

API Stability - CLIRR (2/2)

Example from XWiki 5.0M1 Release notes

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 11: Implementing Quality on Java projects

<plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin <configuration> <excludePackageNames>*.internal.* </excludePackageNames>

API Stability - Internal PackageJavadoc

CLIRR<plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>clirr-maven-plugin</artifactId> <excludes> <exclude>**/internal/**</exclude> <exclude>**/test/**</exclude>

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 12: Implementing Quality on Java projects

<plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>aspectj-maven-plugin</...>... <configuration> <weaveDependencies> <weaveDependency> <groupId>org.xwiki.rendering</...> <artifactId>xwiki-rendering-api</...>...

API Stability - Legacy Module

Aspect Weaving

+ “Legacy” Profile

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 13: Implementing Quality on Java projects

API Stability - Young APIs

/** * ... * @since 5.0M1 */@Unstable(<optional explanation>)public EntityReference createEntityReference(String name,...){...}

+ max duration for keeping the annotation!

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 14: Implementing Quality on Java projects

API Stability - Next steps

• Annotation or package for SPI?

• Better define when to use the @Unstable annotation

• Not possible to add a new method to an existing Interface

• Java 8 and Virtual Extension/Defender methods

interface TestInterface {  public void testMe();  public void newMethod() default {    System.out.println("Default from interface");  }}

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 15: Implementing Quality on Java projects

27 au 29 mars 2013

Quality Tip #2

JAR Hell

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 16: Implementing Quality on Java projects

The Problem

Class Not Found or Method Not Found or not working feature

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 17: Implementing Quality on Java projects

No duplicate classes @ runtime

<plugin> <groupId>com.ning.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-duplicate-finder-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution> <phase>verify</phase> <goals> <goal>check</goal> </goals> <configuration> <failBuildInCaseOfConflict>true</...> <exceptions> ...

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 18: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Surprising results...

• Commons Beanutils bundles some classes from Commons Collections, apparently to avoid drawing a dependency to it...

• Xalan bundles a lot of other projects (org/apache/xml/**, org/apache/bcel/**, JLex/**, java_cup/**, org/apache/regexp/**). In addition, it even has these jars in its source tree without any indication about their versions...

• stax-api, geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec and xml-apis all draw javax.xml.stream.* classes

• xmlbeans and xml-apis draw incompatible versions of org.w3c.dom.* classes

14 exceptions in total!Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 19: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Maven: dependency version issue

<dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId> <artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId> <version>1.4.0</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>ch.qos.logback</groupId> <artifactId>logback-classic</artifactId> <version>0.9.9</version> <!-- Depends on org.slf4j:slf4j-api:1.5.0 --> </dependency></dependencies>

Will run logback 0.9.9 with slf4J-api 1.4.0 instead of 1.5.0!

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 20: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Maven: ensure correct version<plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-enforcer-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution> <id>enforce-version-compatibility</id> <phase>verify</phase> <goals> <goal>enforce</goal> </goals> <configuration> <rules> <requireUpperBoundDeps/> </rules>

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 21: Implementing Quality on Java projects

27 au 29 mars 2013

Quality Tip #3

Test Coverage

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 22: Implementing Quality on Java projects

The Problem

More bugs reported, overall quality goes down and harder to debug

software

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 23: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Use Jacoco to fail the build<plugin> <groupId>org.jacoco</groupId> <artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution><id>jacoco-prepare</id> <goals><goal>prepare-agent</goal></goals> </execution> <execution><id>jacoco-check</id> <goals><goal>check</goal></goals> </execution> </executions> <configuration> <check> <instructionRatio>${xwiki.jacoco.instructionRatio}</...> </check>}

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 24: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Strategy

• When devs add code (and thus tests), increase the TPC percentage

• Put the Jacoco check in “Quality” Maven Profile

• Have a CI job to execute that profile regularly

• About 15% overhead compared to build without checks

• “Cheat mode”: Add easier-to-write test

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 25: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Quizz Time!

[INFO] --- jacoco-maven-plugin:0.6.2.201302030002:check (jacoco-check)[INFO] All coverage checks have been met.

[INFO] --- jacoco-maven-plugin:0.6.2.201302030002:check (jacoco-check) [WARNING] Insufficient code coverage for INSTRUCTION: 75.52% < 75.53%

Step 1: Building on my local machine gives the following:

Step 2: Building on the CI machine gave:

Non determinism! Why?

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 26: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Quizz Answer

private Map componentEntries = new ConcurrentHashMap();...for (Map.Entry entry : componentEntries.entrySet()){ if (entry.getValue().instance == component) {  key = entry.getKey();    oldDescriptor = entry.getValue().descriptor;    break;  }}

... because the JVM is non deterministic!

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 27: Implementing Quality on Java projects

27 au 29 mars 2013

Quality Tip #4

Functional Testing Stability (with Jenkins)

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 28: Implementing Quality on Java projects

The Problem

Too many false positives leading to developers not paying attention to CI

emails anymore... leading to failing software

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 29: Implementing Quality on Java projects

False positives examples

• The JVM has crashed

• VNC is down (we run Selenium tests)

• Browser crash (we run Selenium tests)

• Git connection issue

• Machine slowness (if XWiki cannot start under 2 minutes then it means the machine has some problems)

• Nexus is down (we deploy our artifacts to a Nexus repository)

• Connection issue (Read time out)

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 30: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Step 1: Groovy PostBuild Plugin (1/2)def messages = [ [".*A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment.*", "JVM Crash", "A JVM crash happened!"], [".*Error: cannot open display: :1.0.*", "VNC not running", "VNC connection issue!"], ...]def shouldSendEmail = truemessages.each { message -> if (manager.logContains(message.get(0))) { manager.addWarningBadge(message.get(1)) manager.createSummary("warning.gif").appendText(...) manager.buildUnstable() shouldSendEmail = false }}

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 31: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Step 1: Groovy PostBuild Plugin (2/2)

... continued from previous slide...

if (!shouldSendEmail) { def pa = new ParametersAction([ new BooleanParameterValue("noEmail", true) ]) manager.build.addAction(pa)}

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 32: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Step 2: Mail Ext Plugin

import hudson.model.*

build.actions.each { action -> if (action instanceof ParametersAction) { if (action.getParameter("noEmail")) { cancel = true } }}

Pre-send Script

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 33: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Results

+ use the Scriptler plugin to automate configuration for all jobs

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 34: Implementing Quality on Java projects

27 au 29 mars 2013

Quality Tip #5

Bug Fixing Day

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 35: Implementing Quality on Java projects

The Problem

Bugs increasing, even simple to fixones, devs focusing too much on new

features (i.e. scope creep) vs fixing what exists

Bugs created vs closed

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 36: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Bug Fixing Day

• Every Thursday

• Goal is to close the max number of bugs

• Triaging: Can be closed with Won’t fix, Duplicate, Cannot Reproduce, etc

• Close low hanging fruits in priority

• Started with last 365 days then with last 547 days and currently with last 730 days (we need to catch up with 40 bugs!)

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 37: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Results

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 38: Implementing Quality on Java projects

27 au 29 mars 2013

Conclusion

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 39: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Parting words

• Slowly add new quality check over time

• Everyone must be on board

• Favor Active Quality (i.e. make the build fail) over Passive checks

• Be ready to adapt/remove checks if found not useful enough

• Quality brings some risks:

• Potentially less committers for your project (especially open source)

• Project seen as “less fun”

Sunday, March 31, 13

Page 40: Implementing Quality on Java projects

Be proud of your Quality!

“I have offended God and mankind because my work didn't reach the quality it should have.”

Leonardo da Vinci, on his death bed

Sunday, March 31, 13