Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic...

12
Implementing a programmatic approach The REVISED FIP results framework Guido Geissler, CIF Administrative Unit

Transcript of Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic...

Page 1: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Implementing a programmatic approachThe REVISED FIP results framework

Guido Geissler, CIF Administrative Unit

Page 2: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

FIP results framework -

Simplification

FIP results framework – approved June 11 -

Impact level indicators: 8Outcome level indicators: 11Project/program indicators: 13Total: 32

Investment PlansBrazil

Burkina FasoDR Congo

GhanaIndonesiaLao PDRMexico

Peru

REVISED FIP results framework – October 2012 -

Impact level indicators: 3Outcome level indicators: 9Project/program indicators: 0Total: 12

Living documentLearning-by-doing

FIP pilot countries meeting/MDB working group

Page 3: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Improved low carbon, climate resilient developmentGlobal - CIF Final Outcome(15-20 yrs)

New & additional resources supplementing existing ODA flows

REDD+ or equivalent forest strategies (incl. identification of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation)FIP Inputs

Country - FIP ProgramOutcomes(5-10 yrs)

An institutional and legal/regulatory framework that

supports sustainable management of forests and protects rights of

local communities and indigenous peoples

Sustainable management of forests and forest landscapes

to address drivers of deforestation and forest

degradation

Local communities and indigenous peoples’

capacity strengthened to access information and participate in decision

making

Forest Investment Program (FIP) – Logic Model

Country -Transformative Impact (10-15 yrs)

Core objectives: Co-benefit objectives : •Reduced poverty•Reduced biodiversity loss •Increased resilience of forest ecosystems

Reduced/avoided GHG emissions from deforestation

and forest degradation, and enhanced forest carbon stocks

Institutional capacity, forest

governance and information

Investments in sustainable

management of forests,

including protection

Investments outside the

forest sector

Project/ Program - FIP Indicative Outcomes & Outputs(2-7 yrs)

Project/ Program –FIP indicative activities(1-7 yrs)

Number of people in targeted forest communities with increased

monetary or non-monetary benefits from forest resources

Tons of CO2 sequestered / emissions avoided in project/program area

Hectares of forest restored/afforested in program

area

Reforms in forest policy, legislation or other regulations

Government institutions provided with capacity building support to

improve management of forest resources

Hectares of protected forest in project/program area

Page 4: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Improved low carbon, climate resilient developmentGlobal - CIF Final Outcome(15-20 yrs)

New & additional resources supplementing existing ODA flows

REDD+ or equivalent forest strategies (incl. identification of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation)FIP Inputs

Country -Transformative Impact (10-15 yrs)

Core objective: Reduced GHG emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; enhancement of forest carbon stocks

Co-benefit objective: Reduced biodiversity loss and increased resilience of forest ecosystems to

climate variability and change

Co-benefit objective: Reduced poverty through improved quality of life of forest dependant indigenous peoples and forest communities

Country - FIP Catalytic Replication Outcomes(5-10 yrs)

Reduced deforestation and forest degradation and enhanced conservation

Improved enabling environment

for REDD + and sustainable management

of forests

Regional level:Replication of FIP

learning in non-FIP countries

Increased direct management of forest resources by local

communities and indigenous peoples

Access to predictable and adequate financial resources, incl.

results-based incentives for REDD+ and sustainable management of

forests

An institutional and

legal/regulatory framework

that supports sustainable

management of forests

and protects the rights of

local communities and

indigenous peoples

Sustainable

management of forests

and forest landscapes

to address drivers of

deforestation and forest

degradation

Reduced pressure on forest and its ecosystems

Empowered local

communities and

indigenous peoples

and protection of their

rights

Institutional capacity, forest

governance and information

Investments in sustainable

management of forests,

including protection

Investments outside the

forest sector

Leveraging

Increased

other public

& private

sources of

financing /

investment

Knowledge

Management

Learning about

piloting &

implementation

captured &

shared across

projects and

programs

New &

additional

resources for

REDD+

implementation

Integration of

learning by

development

actors active in

REDD+

Project/ Program -FIP Outputs & Outcomes(2-7 yrs)

Project/ Program -FIP Activities(1-7 yrs)

CIF Program

Increased capacity to address direct and underlying drivers of

deforestation and forest degradation (as identified in national REDD+

strategies or equivalents )

Page 5: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Linking projects/programs

with FIP objectives

The revised results framework requires that projects/programs submitted for Sub-Committee approval ...

... clearly articulate how the outputs will contribute to a FIP outcome (results chain)

... include a DRAFT results frameworks at the program/project level with a set of concise output indicators

Page 6: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

M&E Reports

• An M&E report is an opportunity for implementers to inform themselves

& others (stakeholders, partners, donors, etc.) on the progress,

problems, difficulties encountered, success & lessons learned during implementation of programs and

activities

• An M&E reports is a communication tool to present M&E results by

presenting raw data & information as knowledge

M&E system magic

triangle

Key message: FIP M&E is primarily a management tool for the country to

make informed decisions concerning the transformational process – public accountability and learning

Evidence – based decision making

Page 7: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

FIP results reporting

framework

Endorsed Investment Plan (IP)

Approved projects/programs

Planning

FIP Design Document

Approved FIPResults Framework

IP results framework

Project/programresults framework

Monitoring

Project/ Program

evaluations

Countryprogram

evaluations

CIFindependent

evaluation

FIP operational report

Reporting

Project/program implementation progress

report

IP implementation progress report

ANNUALreport

Evaluation

Page 8: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Implementing a

programmatic approach

OBJECTIVE: Reporting progress in implementing the Investment Plan

Reduced/avoided GHG emissions from deforestation

and forest degradation, and enhanced forest carbon stocks

Country in the lead of reporting:• Dialogue among development partners – broad based ownership• Consolidate/coordinate project/program output information –

sharing lessons

Key message: FIP pilot country is the central reporting unit to the FIP Sub-

Committee

Page 9: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

FIP M&E Reports

Phase 1: Establish baselines for FIP indicators

Phase 2: Portfolio development reporting

Phase 3: Results reporting

Implementation status of the Investment Plan (outputs, outcomes, co-benefits)Key accomplishments/lessons

Key issues / challengesPlans for next reporting period

Key message: BASELINES AND TARGETS need to be established by April 2013

Page 10: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Implementing a programmatic

approach - CONCLUSION

Strategic management of the transformation process – FIP pilot countries need to develop their own theory of change

Coherent M&E system – FIP indicators need to be part of the national M&E system with clear assigned organizational roles and responsibilities

Facilitation – convening power to bring together various stakeholders on a regular basis (at least once a year) to discuss progress and share lessons

Capacity – human and technical capacity to consolidate data and prepare reports

Page 11: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Implementing a programmatic

approach – CONCLUSION

FIP pilot country is the central reporting unit to the FIP Sub-Committee

FIP M&E is primarily a management tool for the country to make decisions concerning the transformational process – public

accountability and learning

BASELINES AND TARGETS need to be established by April 2013

Don’t forget the “E” in M&E – Countries need to take the lead in the evaluation process – this requires evaluation capacity at the national

level

Page 12: Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process –FIP pilot countries need to develop their

Managing for Results –

working together

Thank you!

Contact:Guido Geissler

Email: [email protected]