Teaching psychological research methods through a pragmatic and programmatic approach.
Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic...
Transcript of Implementing a programmatic approach - Climate … a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic...
Implementing a programmatic approachThe REVISED FIP results framework
Guido Geissler, CIF Administrative Unit
FIP results framework -
Simplification
FIP results framework – approved June 11 -
Impact level indicators: 8Outcome level indicators: 11Project/program indicators: 13Total: 32
Investment PlansBrazil
Burkina FasoDR Congo
GhanaIndonesiaLao PDRMexico
Peru
REVISED FIP results framework – October 2012 -
Impact level indicators: 3Outcome level indicators: 9Project/program indicators: 0Total: 12
Living documentLearning-by-doing
FIP pilot countries meeting/MDB working group
Improved low carbon, climate resilient developmentGlobal - CIF Final Outcome(15-20 yrs)
New & additional resources supplementing existing ODA flows
REDD+ or equivalent forest strategies (incl. identification of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation)FIP Inputs
Country - FIP ProgramOutcomes(5-10 yrs)
An institutional and legal/regulatory framework that
supports sustainable management of forests and protects rights of
local communities and indigenous peoples
Sustainable management of forests and forest landscapes
to address drivers of deforestation and forest
degradation
Local communities and indigenous peoples’
capacity strengthened to access information and participate in decision
making
Forest Investment Program (FIP) – Logic Model
Country -Transformative Impact (10-15 yrs)
Core objectives: Co-benefit objectives : •Reduced poverty•Reduced biodiversity loss •Increased resilience of forest ecosystems
Reduced/avoided GHG emissions from deforestation
and forest degradation, and enhanced forest carbon stocks
Institutional capacity, forest
governance and information
Investments in sustainable
management of forests,
including protection
Investments outside the
forest sector
Project/ Program - FIP Indicative Outcomes & Outputs(2-7 yrs)
Project/ Program –FIP indicative activities(1-7 yrs)
Number of people in targeted forest communities with increased
monetary or non-monetary benefits from forest resources
Tons of CO2 sequestered / emissions avoided in project/program area
Hectares of forest restored/afforested in program
area
Reforms in forest policy, legislation or other regulations
Government institutions provided with capacity building support to
improve management of forest resources
Hectares of protected forest in project/program area
Improved low carbon, climate resilient developmentGlobal - CIF Final Outcome(15-20 yrs)
New & additional resources supplementing existing ODA flows
REDD+ or equivalent forest strategies (incl. identification of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation)FIP Inputs
Country -Transformative Impact (10-15 yrs)
Core objective: Reduced GHG emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; enhancement of forest carbon stocks
Co-benefit objective: Reduced biodiversity loss and increased resilience of forest ecosystems to
climate variability and change
Co-benefit objective: Reduced poverty through improved quality of life of forest dependant indigenous peoples and forest communities
Country - FIP Catalytic Replication Outcomes(5-10 yrs)
Reduced deforestation and forest degradation and enhanced conservation
Improved enabling environment
for REDD + and sustainable management
of forests
Regional level:Replication of FIP
learning in non-FIP countries
Increased direct management of forest resources by local
communities and indigenous peoples
Access to predictable and adequate financial resources, incl.
results-based incentives for REDD+ and sustainable management of
forests
An institutional and
legal/regulatory framework
that supports sustainable
management of forests
and protects the rights of
local communities and
indigenous peoples
Sustainable
management of forests
and forest landscapes
to address drivers of
deforestation and forest
degradation
Reduced pressure on forest and its ecosystems
Empowered local
communities and
indigenous peoples
and protection of their
rights
Institutional capacity, forest
governance and information
Investments in sustainable
management of forests,
including protection
Investments outside the
forest sector
Leveraging
Increased
other public
& private
sources of
financing /
investment
Knowledge
Management
Learning about
piloting &
implementation
captured &
shared across
projects and
programs
New &
additional
resources for
REDD+
implementation
Integration of
learning by
development
actors active in
REDD+
Project/ Program -FIP Outputs & Outcomes(2-7 yrs)
Project/ Program -FIP Activities(1-7 yrs)
CIF Program
Increased capacity to address direct and underlying drivers of
deforestation and forest degradation (as identified in national REDD+
strategies or equivalents )
Linking projects/programs
with FIP objectives
The revised results framework requires that projects/programs submitted for Sub-Committee approval ...
... clearly articulate how the outputs will contribute to a FIP outcome (results chain)
... include a DRAFT results frameworks at the program/project level with a set of concise output indicators
M&E Reports
• An M&E report is an opportunity for implementers to inform themselves
& others (stakeholders, partners, donors, etc.) on the progress,
problems, difficulties encountered, success & lessons learned during implementation of programs and
activities
• An M&E reports is a communication tool to present M&E results by
presenting raw data & information as knowledge
M&E system magic
triangle
Key message: FIP M&E is primarily a management tool for the country to
make informed decisions concerning the transformational process – public accountability and learning
Evidence – based decision making
FIP results reporting
framework
Endorsed Investment Plan (IP)
Approved projects/programs
Planning
FIP Design Document
Approved FIPResults Framework
IP results framework
Project/programresults framework
Monitoring
Project/ Program
evaluations
Countryprogram
evaluations
CIFindependent
evaluation
FIP operational report
Reporting
Project/program implementation progress
report
IP implementation progress report
ANNUALreport
Evaluation
Implementing a
programmatic approach
OBJECTIVE: Reporting progress in implementing the Investment Plan
Reduced/avoided GHG emissions from deforestation
and forest degradation, and enhanced forest carbon stocks
Country in the lead of reporting:• Dialogue among development partners – broad based ownership• Consolidate/coordinate project/program output information –
sharing lessons
Key message: FIP pilot country is the central reporting unit to the FIP Sub-
Committee
FIP M&E Reports
Phase 1: Establish baselines for FIP indicators
Phase 2: Portfolio development reporting
Phase 3: Results reporting
Implementation status of the Investment Plan (outputs, outcomes, co-benefits)Key accomplishments/lessons
Key issues / challengesPlans for next reporting period
Key message: BASELINES AND TARGETS need to be established by April 2013
Implementing a programmatic
approach - CONCLUSION
Strategic management of the transformation process – FIP pilot countries need to develop their own theory of change
Coherent M&E system – FIP indicators need to be part of the national M&E system with clear assigned organizational roles and responsibilities
Facilitation – convening power to bring together various stakeholders on a regular basis (at least once a year) to discuss progress and share lessons
Capacity – human and technical capacity to consolidate data and prepare reports
Implementing a programmatic
approach – CONCLUSION
FIP pilot country is the central reporting unit to the FIP Sub-Committee
FIP M&E is primarily a management tool for the country to make decisions concerning the transformational process – public
accountability and learning
BASELINES AND TARGETS need to be established by April 2013
Don’t forget the “E” in M&E – Countries need to take the lead in the evaluation process – this requires evaluation capacity at the national
level