Implementation strategy 2012-2014. Minimun standards for child protection in humanitarian action

Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 1

objective 1:Humanitarian actors are aware of, and refer to, the Minimum Standards


3. Target Audience These standards are intended for use by those working on child protection or related areas of humanitarian action. This includes 1) those working directly with children, families and communities 2) planners and policy makers at Agency and Government level 3) coordinators 4) donors 5) academics and 6) those working on advocacy, media or communications.

4. Main Activities under each ObjectiveEach of the three Objectives is broken down into suggested Activities, as is listed below. Collectively, the Activities under the Objectives contribute towards achieving the goal.

1.1. Finalise the Minimum Standards and produce copies for dissemination1.1.1. Translate the Minimum Standards into French, Spanish and Arabic and other languages on demand1.1.2. Print the Minimum Standards and develop USB keys that contain the Minimum Standards

1.2. Disseminate English, French and Arabic versions of Minimum Standards1.2.1. Identify low-cost options for storage and mailing the Minimum Standards 1.2.2. Disseminate the Minimum Standards to practitioners from child protection and other sectors1.2.3. Develop a webpage on the Minimum Standards linked to the CPWG website

1.3. Develop «launch pack» for the launch events for the Minimum Standards1.3.1. Develop recommended ‘guidelines’ for launch events 1.3.2. Develop a press kit on the Minimum Standards

1.4. Launch, in collaboration with Governments, the Minimum Standards at 6 global and regional events�� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�ºNSVIHS�SL]LS»�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�.LUL]H�� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�)HUNRVR��;OHPSHUK�� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�+HRHY��:LULNHS�� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�5HPYVIP��2LU`H�� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�(TTHU��1VYKHU�� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�7HUHTH1.4.7. Update list of scheduled launch events (including national ones) and post on Standards webpage

1.5. Launch, in collaboration with Governments, the Minimum Standards at 15 national level events1.5.1. Liaise with the 25 countries that have CP sub-Clusters that would be able to support a national launch1.5.2. Support countries who volunteer to hold a national event with planning the event

1.6. Develop additional promotional material for the Minimum Standards for a variety of audiences1.6.1. Produce a 1-page brochure on the Minimum Standards in French, Arabic and Spanish1.6.2. Develop a 3-5 minute video about the Minimum Standards and CPIE

1.7. Promote commitment to application of the Minimum Standards1.7.1. Include compliance with Minimum Standards in letters of commitment from CPWG agencies1.7.2. Ensure that the Minimum Standards are circulated widely amongst IASC, CERF and CAP Secretariats1.7.3. Ensure that the Minimum Standards are referred to in new IASC agreed tools and processes

objective 2:The Minimum Standards are an integral part of humanitarian programming and the quality of child protection programming has improved to meet the Minimum Standards


1.8. Target key CP events and persons in CP agencies to raise awareness about the Minimum Standards1.8.1. Develop a calendar of key CP events scheduled over the course of the next 12-24 months that could be targeted to raise awareness about the Minimum Standards 1.8.2. Compile a list of ‘Point Persons’ within CPWG member agencies who can take forward awareness raising on, and dissemination of the Minimum Standards within their agencies

1.9. Target key non-CP events and humanitarian actors to raise awareness about the Minimum Standards1.9.1. Develop a calendar of key events related to humanitarian response scheduled over the course of the next 12-24 months that could be targeted to raise awareness (e.g. ECHO annual partners meeting, annual meetings of at least 3 other clusters, etc.)�� 3PHPZL�^P[O�6*/(�HUK�[OL�,TLYNLUJ`�9LZPKLU[�*VVYKPUH[VY»Z�6MÄJL�[V�KL[LYTPUL�^H`Z�[V�YHPZL� awareness amongst the Humanitarian Coordinators and Humanitarian Country Teams1.9.3. Brief global level Cluster Coordinators on the Minimum Standards

1.10. Track the use and reception of the Minimum Standards1.10.1. Monitor and document spin-offs, training packages, etc.1.10.2. Monitor/coordinate, document and support further translations1.10.3. Develop and maintain feedback mechanism to identify gaps, further requirements et, for future revisions and other improvements

2.1. Provide technical assistance for humanitarian agencies implementing the Minimum Standards2.1.1. Make available one full time deployable child protection expert who can provide technical assistance �� +LWSV`�[OL�L_WLY[�H[�H�YH[L�VM��[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK�JOPSK�WYV[LJ[PVU�YLZWVUZLZ��WYPVYP[PZPUN�PU[LYHNLUJ`� requests over single agency requests) to advise and support on implementation of the MS2.1.3. Develop a knowledge bank of tools to support implementation of the Minimum Standards

2.2. Develop training and orientation materials on the Minimum Standards for practitioners2.2.1. Review existing CPIE training materials and ensure that Minimum Standards are adequately referenced 2.2.2. Develop training materials for the Standards which are not yet covered in the package2.2.3. Develop an online training course on the Minimum Standards for Child Protection actors�� +L]LSVW�H�WHWLY�VU�OV^�[V�\ZL�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�H[�ÄLSK�SL]LS��JVU[L_[\HSPZH[PVU�HUK�TVUP[VYPUN�2.2.5. Develop webinars for the Minimum Standards, each webinar covering a different standard

2.3. Develop a tool to evaluate compliance of programming with the Minimum Standards2.3.1. Develop a tool to monitor and evaluate compliance of project proposals with the Minimum Standards2.3.2. Promote the compliance tool amongst CP sub-Clusters in emergency contexts for use2.3.3. CP sub-Clusters use compliance tool to rate overall project proposals (similar to Gender Marker)

2.4. Develop, in collaboration with the Protection Cluster, tools to promote the Minimum Standards for practitioners from other sectors2.4.1. Develop 2 page documents on Standard relevant for other sectors – linking with Sphere standards2.4.2. Develop orientation sessions (online or in person) on the Minimum Standards for other sectors 2.4.3. Identify ways, with Cluster Coordinators, to promote these tools in the different sectors and contexts

2.5. Identify donors and/or governments who could champion application of the Minimum Standards2.5.1. Identify 3-5 government partners who could champion the implementation of the Minimum Standards2.5.2. Develop talking points for sessions with donors and government representatives2.5.3. Carry out orientation sessions with the interested donors and government representatives to discuss with them what would be possible in terms of incorporating the Standards into their plans or strategies2.5.4. Explore possibilities for short term secondments to support the implementation strategy

objective 3:The Minimum Standards are used, and referred to in programme support processes,such as human resource management and fundraising


2.6. Support adaptation and interpretation of the Minimum Standards 2.6.1. Develop a child-friendly version of the standards2.6.2. Develop a process, with required tools, to orientate community members on the Minimum Standards�� +L]LSVW�H�WYVJLZZ��^P[O�YLX\PYLK�[VVSZ��[V�VYPLU[H[L�ZWLJPÄJ�[HYNL[�NYV\WZ��L�N��YLSPNPV\Z�SLHKLYZ��VU� the Minimum Standards

�� 6WUHQJWKHQ�SUDFWLFH�LQ�UHODWLRQ�WR�VSHFLðF�ìSULQFLSOHVú�DQG�ìVWDQGDUGVú�� (The responsibility for attainment of these objectives is taken on by named lead agencies in the CPWG work plan and will be monitored by the CPWG)2.7.1. Strengthen child protection systems: Collect, and make available, learning on strengthening child protection systems in emergencies2.7.2. Unaccompanied and separated children: Develop and ensure coherent global guidance by the � *7>.�<(:*�;HZR�-VYJL�VU�<(:*�WYVNYHTTPUN��[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK�JVVYKPUH[PVU�TLJOHUPZTZ��IHZLK on the Minimum Standards 2.7.3. Sexual violence: Make available interagency guidance on programming on sexual violence against � JOPSKYLU�[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK�JVVYKPUH[PVU�TLJOHUPZTZ��IHZLK�VU�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ��PU�JVVWLYH[PVU� with the GBV AoR 2.7.4. Child labour:�4HRL�H]HPSHISL�PU[LYHNLUJ`�N\PKHUJL�VU�WYVNYHTTPUN�VU�JOPSK�SHIV\Y�[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK� coordination mechanisms, based on the Minimum Standards 2.7.5. Child-friendly spaces:�+L]LSVW��[LZ[�HUK�ÄUHSPZL�HJJVTWHU`PUN�[YHPUPUN�WHJRHNL�[V�Z\WWVY[�H[[HPUTLU[� of the Minimum Standards in CFS programmes2.7.6. Case management: collect and analyse examples of existing case management systems in emergencies in order to assess current gaps and challenges in meeting the Minimum Standards 2.7.7. Disaster Risk Reduction: Develop and test a conceptual framework on child protection and DRR and ensure that this is considered in subsequent versions of the Minimum Standards

3.1. Monitor and evaluate compliance of agency’s policies and procedures with the Minimum Standards3.1.1. Develop an institutionalisation checklist for agencies to self-assess the integration of the Minimum Standards within their agencies3.1.2. Promote use of the institutionalisation checklist amongst all CPWG agencies �� :\WWVY[�HNLUJPLZ�[V�KL]LSVW�WSHUZ�[V�HKKYLZZ�NHWZ�PKLU[PÄLK3.1.4. Follow-up with agencies at agreed times once a year to monitor progress against set objectives

3.2. Develop guidance and materials to support the institutionalisation of the Minimum Standards3.2.1. Develop orientation on the Minimum Standards for induction of new staff3.2.2. Develop guidance on how to include the Minimum Standards in job descriptions and interviews3.2.3. Develop guidance on how to include the Minimum Standards into their agency websites, laptops, etc.3.2.4. Develop guidance on how to include the Minimum Standards in performance management of staff3.2.5. Develop criteria for agency internal review of project funding proposals

3.3. Develop guidance to support agencies in their monitoring and evaluation work3.3.1. Liaise with the Child Protection Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group (CP MERG) �� 3PHPZL�^P[O�(35(7��6,*+�HUK�V[OLY�IVKPLZ�[OH[�WYVK\JL�N\PKHUJL�MVY�JHYY`PUN�V\[�L]HS\H[PVUZ�3.3.3. Develop guidance for how agencies can include the Minimum Standards in evaluations


Increase inawareness of, and knowledge about,the Minimum Standards

# of interagency strategies in emergency contexts that refer to the Minimum Standards

# of regional/country-based/local launches

# of people who have attended an awareness raising session e.g. a launch L]LU[�VY�H�IYPLÄUN

:\Y]L`�VM�*7�ÄLSKlevel coordination mechanisms

Launch trackrecords

Twice per year

Increase in the access to the Minimum Standards

# of downloads of the Minimum Standards via the webpage, per country and type of organisation

# of print and USB versions of Minimum Standards disseminated

Analysis of webpage visits

Distribution track record

Once per year

Ensure compliance with the Minimum Standards by CPWG members

# of Letters of commitment by CPWG agencies

Once per year

OUTCOMES OUTCOMESINDICATORS

METhODOF DATA

COLLECTION

FREqUENCyOF DATA

COLLECTION

ObjECTIvE 1

Humanitarianactors are

aware of, andrefer to,

the Minimum Standards


Improved capacity of CP practitioners to deliver CP responses in line with best practice

��VM�ÄLSK�SL]LS�CP coordination mechanisms whose gap and services analysis is based on the Minimum Standards

# of CPWG member agencies who incorporate the Minimum Standards into their humanitarian capacity building programs

# of Government partners promoting the use of the Minimum Standards

:\Y]L`�VM�*7�ÄLSK�level coordination mechanisms

Survey of agencies

Once per year

Once per year

Once per year

CP is mainstreamed into other sectors

�VM�ZLJ[VY�ZWLJPÄJ�tools for CP mainstreaming

# of orientation sessions held on global/regional/country level on CP mainstreaming (based on Minimum Standards)

Track record

Increased resources for CP responses that are in line with Minimum Standards

# of donors who reference the Minimum Standards in their funding requirements

Survey of donors Once per year

Improved quality in programming (in key areas) based on the Minimum Standards

�ÄLSK�IHZLK�CP coordination mechanisms reporting improvements of quality in programming PU�PKLU[PÄLK�HYLHZ

�VM�HNLUJPLZ�HUK�ÄLSK�based coordination mechanisms reporting against minimum 5 standard indicators (any)

:\Y]L`�VM�*7�ÄLSK�level coordination mechanisms

Outcome of monitoring information through the accountability tool

Once per year

OUTCOMES OUTCOMESINDICATORS

METhODOF DATA

COLLECTION

FREqUENCyOF DATA

COLLECTION

ObjECTIvE 2

The quality of child protection programming

has improved to meet the Minimum

Standards

Increased capacity of agencies to monitor performance of staff in line with Minimum Standards

% (or #?) of agencies that report that they have incorporated the Minimum Standards in their performance management of relevant staff

Survey of agencies Once per year

Increased capacity of CP agencies to provide predictableCP responses

% of agencies that report that they have incorporated Minimum Standards into evaluation processes

Survey of agencies Once per year

ObjECTIvE 3

The Minimum Standards are

used, and referredto in programme

support processes, such as human

resource management

and fundraising


IMPACT IMPACTINDICATORS

METhODOF DATA

COLLECTION

FREqUENCyOF DATA

COLLECTION

Improvedquality,

predictability and

accountabilityof child

protection responses in emergencies

��0U[LY]LU[PVUZ�[V�TP[PNH[L�[OL�[VW�Ä]L�dangers to girls and boys of different age are in place in all affected communities

2. Percentage of communities where child-friendly responses have been put in place for survivors of physical violence and harmful practices

3. Percentage of reported cases of children who experience sexual violence who receive an age- and gender- appropriate response

4. Percentage of targeted children involved in CP programmes reported to be showing a decrease in symptoms associated with mental disorders and psychosocial distress compared to the baseline

5. Percentage of girls and boys separated from armed forces or groups who are effectively reintegrated in their families and the community or alternatively integrated

6. Number of children involved in the Worst Forms of Child Labour who receive adequate support

7. Percentage of children registered for tracing that have been YL\UPÄLK and stayed with their family for more than six months

8. Percentage of children who are in contact with the police who are dealt with using child-friendly procedures

Survey of CP ðHOG�OHYHO�

coordination mechanisms

Once per year


AC

TIv

ITy

TO

TAL

CO

ST

(US

D)

CO

MM

ITT

ED

OR

IDE

NT

IFIE

D F

UN

DIN

GF

UN

DIN

GS

TIL

L N

EE

DE

DN

OT

ES

1.1.

Fin

alis

e th

e M

inim

um S

tand

ard

s an

d p

rod

uce

cop

ies

for

dis

sem

inat

ion

56’0

0040

’000

16’0

00

1.2.

Dis

sem

inat

e E

nglis

h, F

renc

h an

d A

rabi

c ve

rsio

ns o

f Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds20

’000

-20

’000

1.3.

Dev

elop

«la

unch

pac

k» fo

r th

e la

unch

eve

nts

for

the

Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds2’

000

-2’

000

1.4.

Lau

nch

the

Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds a

t 6 g

loba

l and

regi

onal

leve

l eve

nts

20’0

00-

20’0

004’

000

x 5

even

ts

1.5.

Lau

nch

the

Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds a

t 15

natio

nal l

evel

eve

nts

--

-

1.6.

Dev

elop

add

ition

al p

rom

otio

nal m

ater

ial f

or t

he M

inim

um S

tand

ards

for

a va

riety

of a

udie

nce

8’00

05’

000

3’00

07’

000

vid

eo

1’00

0 b

roch

ure

1.7.

Pro

mot

e co

mm

itmen

t to

appl

icat

ion

of th

e M

inim

um S

tand

ard

s-

--

1.8.

Tar

get

key

CP

eve

nts

and

pers

ons

in C

P a

genc

ies

to r

aise

aw

aren

ess

abou

t the

Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds-

--

1.9.

Tar

get

key

non-

CP

eve

nts

and

hum

anita

rian

acto

rs t

o ra

ise

awar

enes

s ab

out t

he M

inim

um S

tand

ards

--

-

1.10

. Tra

ck th

e us

e an

d re

cept

ion

of th

e M

inim

um S

tand

ard

s10

’000

-10

’000

Oth

er t

rans

latio

ns

Sub

tota

l OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

116’

000

45’0

0071

’000

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

: H

UM

AN

ITA

RIA

N A

CT

OR

S A

RE

AW

AR

E O

F, A

ND

RE

FER

TO

, TH

E M

INIM

UM

STA

ND

AR

DS


AC

TIv

ITy

TO

TAL

CO

ST

(US

D)

CO

MM

ITT

ED

OR

IDE

NT

IFIE

D F

UN

DIN

GF

UN

DIN

GS

TIL

L N

EE

DE

DN

OT

ES

2.1.

Pro

vid

e te

chni

cal

assi

stan

ce f

or h

uman

itaria

n ag

enci

es i

mp

lem

entin

g th

e M

inim

um S

tand

ard

s10

0’00

0-

100’

000

1 x

fullt

ime

tech

nica

l exp

ert

2.2.

Dev

elop

tra

inin

g an

d or

ient

atio

n m

ater

ials

on

the

Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds fo

r pr

actit

ione

rs15

’000

15’0

00-

Con

sulta

ncy

+ IT

co

sts

2.3.

Dev

elop

a to

ol to

eva

luat

e co

mpl

ianc

e of

pro

gram

min

g w

ith th

e M

inim

um

Sta

ndar

ds10

’000

10’0

00-

Con

sulta

ncy

2.4.

Dev

elop

, in

colla

bora

tion

with

the

Pro

tect

ion

Clu

ster

, too

ls to

pro

mot

e th

e M

inim

um S

tand

ards

for

prac

titio

ners

from

oth

er s

ecto

rs-

--

2.5.

Ide

ntify

don

ors

and/

or g

over

nmen

ts w

ho c

ould

cha

mpi

on a

pplic

atio

n of

th

e M

inim

um S

tand

ards

10’0

0010

’000

-Tr

avel

2.6.

Sup

port

ada

ptat

ion

and

inte

rpre

tatio

n of

the

Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds11

’500

11’5

00-

5’00

0 C

hild

frie

ndly

ver

sion

6’50

0 C

omm

unity

sup

por

t

��:[YLUN[OLU�WYHJ[PJL�PU�YLSH[PVU�[V�ZWLJPÄJ�WYPUJPWSLZ�HUK

�Z[HUK

HYKZ�PU�[OL�

MS

doc

umen

t 21

0’00

0-

210’

000

30’0

00 fo

r ea

ch o

f the

7

elem

ents

men

tione

d a

bov

e

Sub

tota

l OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

356’

500

46’5

0031

0’00

0

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

: T

HE

MIN

IMU

M S

TAN

DA

RD

S A

RE

AR

E IN

TE

GR

AL

PAR

T O

F H

UM

AN

ITA

RIA

N P

RO

GR

AM

MIN

GA

ND

TH

E Q

UA

LIT

Y O

F C

HIL

D P

RO

TE

CT

ION

PR

OG

RA

MM

ING

HA

S IM

PR

OV

ED

TO

ME

ET

TH

E M

INIM

UM

STA

ND

AR

DS

AC

TIv

ITy

TO

TAL

CO

ST

(US

D)

CO

MM

ITT

ED

OR

IDE

NT

IFIE

D F

UN

DIN

GF

UN

DIN

GS

TIL

L N

EE

DE

DN

OT

ES

3.1.

Mon

itor

and

eva

luat

e co

mp

lianc

e of

age

ncy’

s p

olic

ies

and

pro

ced

ures

w

ith t

he M

inim

um S

tand

ard

s-

--

3.2.

Dev

elop

gui

danc

e an

d m

ater

ials

to

supp

ort

the

inst

itutio

nalis

atio

n of

the

M

inim

um S

tand

ards

40’0

00-

40’0

00C

onsu

ltanc

y

3.3.

Dev

elop

gui

dan

ce t

o su

ppor

t ag

enci

es in

the

ir m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n w

ork

10’0

00-

10’0

00P

oint

3.3

.3.

Sub

tota

l OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

50’0

00-

50’0

00

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

: TH

E M

INIM

UM

STA

ND

AR

DS

AR

E U

SE

D, A

ND

RE

FER

RE

D T

O IN

PR

OG

RA

MM

E S

UP

PO

RT

PR

OC

ES

SE

S,

SU

CH

AS

HU

MA

N R

ES

OU

RC

E M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T A

ND

FU

ND

RA

ISIN

G


GLO

bA

L C

OS

TS

Sal

arie

s p

roje

ct m

anag

emen

t20

0’00

065

’000

135’

002

x 50

%

Sub

tota

l GLO

BA

L C

OS

TS

200’

000

65’0

0013

5’00

TO

TAL

722’

500

156’

500

566’

000

AC

TIv

ITy

TO

TAL

CO

ST

(US

D)

CO

MM

ITT

ED

OR

IDE

NT

IFIE

D F

UN

DIN

GF

UN

DIN

GS

TIL

L N

EE

DE

DN

OT

ES

Implementation strategy 2012-2014. Minimun standards for child protection in humanitarian action

News & Politics

Transcript of Implementation strategy 2012-2014. Minimun standards for child protection in humanitarian action