Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

download Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

of 68

Transcript of Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    1/68

    Impact Of NPA On Profitability of Public & Private Sector Banks

    Management Research Project -II

    Submitted

    In the partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Business Administration

    Semester-IV

    By

    Shikha Modi 12044311052

    Priyanka Prajapati 12044311131

    Dhara Shah 12044311146

    Vishesh Shah 12044311147

    Parth Upadhyay 12044311160

    Under the Guidance of:

    Prof. (Dr.) Mahendra Sharma

    Prof. & Head,

    V. M. Patel Institute of Management.

    &

    Jayesh D. Patel

    Assistant Professor,

    V. M. Patel Institute of Management.

    Submitted To:V. M. Patel Institute of Management

    (April 2014)

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    2/68

    Preface

    As a partial fulfillment of the MBA Programme we need to make a Management Research

    Project-II, So we have prepared this project report on Impact of NPA on profitability of public

    sector and private sector bank.

    This project work is basically meant to acquire knowledge about the Non Performing Asset.

    This project report includes comparison of NPA of Public and Private sector bank, recovery

    management, reasons_ tools and methods of Non Performing Assets.

    To understand measures taken by different banks for recovery management under take Banks

    executive survey.

    Preparing this project report is a good learning experience for to us where in we came to know

    about the various new aspects Non Performing Assets.

    We feel great pleasure in submitting this Management Research Project II. We hope you will

    accept and appreciate our efforts.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    3/68

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    Acknowledgement is the expression of gratitude or appreciation for something. So, we would

    like to express our sincere gratitude to all those supportive in this project work. First of all, we

    would like to thank Dr. Mahendra Sharma for giving us this opportunity to do this project and

    learn from it.

    We express our sincere thanks to Prof. Jayesh Patel, our project guide for helping us in giving us

    all relevant information and constant guidance throughout the project.

    We would like to express our sincere thanks Prof. Jayesh Patel for conducting sessions for

    comprehensive project and helping us throughout the project. We would also express our thanks

    for providing their valuable suggestions and knowledge regarding project work.

    Finally we would like to thank all lecturers, friends and our families for their kind of support and

    to all who directly or indirectly helped us in preparing this project report.

    Date:

    Place: Kherva

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    4/68

    List of Table

    4.1.1 ANOVA for Public and Private sector banks 37

    4.1.2 Coefficient for Public and Private sector banks 37

    4.1.3 Model summary for Public and Private sector banks 38

    4.2.1 Descriptive statistics for public sector banks 394.2.2 ANOVA for Public sector banks 39

    4.2.3 Coefficient for public sector banks 40

    4.2.4 Model summary for Public sector banks 40

    4.3.1 Descriptive statistics for Private sector banks 41

    4.3.2 ANOVA for Private sector banks 41

    4.3.3 Coefficient for Private sector banks 41

    4.3.4 Model summary for Private sector banks 42

    8.1 Public sector bank (2013) 51

    8.2 Private sector bank(2013) 52

    8.3 Public sector bank (2012) 54

    8.4 Private sector bank(2012) 558.5 Public sector bank (2011) 57

    8.6 Private sector bank(2011) 58

    8.7 Public sector bank (2010) 60

    8.8 Private sector bank(2010) 61

    8.9 Public sector bank (2009) 63

    8.10 Private sector bank(2009) 64

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    5/68

    1

    Chapter 1

    Introduction

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    6/68

    2

    1.1 Introduction of banking sector in India

    India cannot have a healthy economy without a sound and effective banking system. The

    banking system should be hassle free and able to meet the new challenges posed by

    technology and other factors, both internal and external.

    In the past three decades, India's banking system has earned several outstanding

    achievements to its credit. The most striking is its extensive reach. It is no longer confined

    to metropolises or cities in India. In fact, Indian banking system has reached even to the

    remote corners of the country. This is one of the main aspects of India's growth story.

    The government's regulation policy for banks has paid rich dividends with the

    nationalization of 14 major private banks in 1969. Banking today has become convenient

    and instant, with the account holder not having to wait for hours at the bank counter for

    getting a draft or for withdrawing money from his account.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    7/68

    3

    1.2 Structure of banking sector in India

    Commercial Banks can be classified in to :

    1) Public Sector Bank

    -State Banks & its associate banks

    -Nationalized banks

    2) Private Sector Banks

    -Old Generation

    -New Generation

    -Local Area Banks

    3) Foreign Banks

    -Representative Office

    4) Regional Rural Banks

    5) Co-Operative Banks

    The structure of the Indian banking system that developed during the pre-independence

    period was without any purposive control and direction. There were no comprehensive

    banking laws except the Bank Charter Act. 1876 which regulated the three presidency

    bank and the Indian companies Act, 1913 provided some safeguards against bank

    failures.

    In India the British Government started a central Bank called the Reserve Bank of India

    as a Private sector in 1935. After Independence, the new National Government

    nationalized it by passing the Reserve Bank of India Act in 1949 has some provisions to

    foster a sound and healthy banking system in India. To regulate the banking business the

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    8/68

    4

    Act vested enormous powers of supervision and control in the hands of the reserve bank

    of India.

    Reserve Bank is the banker to the banks-commercial, co-operative and Regional Rural

    Banks. This relationship is established once the name of a bank is included in the second

    schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Such banks, called the scheduled banks,

    are entitled to avail of the facilities of refinance from the Reserve Bank.

    Since 1966 the state co-operative Banks have also been made eligible or inclusion in the

    second schedule to the Act. The Regional Rural Banks, established since 1975, also enjoy

    the status of scheduled banks. The public sector banks have been notified as scheduled

    banks by the central government. The category of scheduled banks thus includes.

    Commercial banksIndian and foreign

    State co-operative Banks

    Regional Rural Banks

    A scheduled Bank means a bank included in the second schedule to the Reserve Bank of

    India. Act, 1934. The Reserve Bank is empowered to include in the second schedule thename of a bank which carries on the business of banking in India and which satisfies the

    following conditions laid down in section 42(a).

    It must have a paid-up capital and reserves of an aggregate value of not less than

    Rs.5 lakhs;

    It must satisfy the Reserve Bank that its affairs are not being conducted in a

    manner detrimental to the interest of its depositors, and

    It must be

    (a) a state co-operative bank, or

    (b) a company as defined in the companies Act, 1956, or

    (c) an institution notified by the central government in this behalf, or

    (d) a corporation or a company incorporation by or under any law in force in

    any place outside India.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    9/68

    5

    1.3 History of Banking in India

    The first bank in India, though conservative, was established in 1786. From 1786 till today, the

    journey of Indian Banking System can be segregated into three distinct phases:

    Early phase of Indian banks, from 1786 to 1969

    Nationalization of banks and the banking sector reforms, from 1969 to 1991

    New phase of Indian banking system, with the reforms after 1991

    Phase 1

    The first bank in India, the General Bank of India, was set up in 1786. Bank of Hindustan

    and Bengal Bank followed. The East India Company established Bank of Bengal (1809),

    Bank of Bombay (1840), and Bank of Madras (1843) as independent units and called them

    Presidency banks. These three banks were amalgamated in 1920 and the Imperial Bank of

    India, a bank of private shareholders, mostly Europeans, was established. Allahabad Bank

    was established, exclusively by Indians, in 1865.

    Punjab National Bank was set up in 1894 with headquarters in Lahore. Between 1906 and

    1913, Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Indian Bank,

    and Bank of Mysore were set up. The Reserve Bank of India came in 1935.

    During the first phase, the growth was very slow and banks also experienced periodic

    failures between 1913 and 1948. There were approximately 1,100 banks, mostly small. To

    streamline the functioning and activities of commercial banks, the Government of India

    came up with the Banking Companies Act, 1949, which was later changed to the Banking

    Regulation Act, 1949 as per amending Act of 1965 (Act No. 23 of 1965).

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was vested with extensive powers for the supervision of

    banking in India as the Central banking authority. During those days, the general public

    had lesser confidence in banks. As an aftermath, deposit mobilization was slow. Moreover,

    the savings bank facility provided by the Postal department was comparatively safer, and

    funds were largely given to traders.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    10/68

    6

    Phase 2

    The government took major initiatives in banking sector reforms after Independence. In

    1955, it nationalized the Imperial Bank of India and started offering extensive banking

    facilities, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. The government constituted the State

    Bank of India to act as the principal agent of the RBI and to handle banking transactions

    of the Union government and state governments all over the country. Seven banks owned

    by the Princely states were nationalized in 1959 and they became subsidiaries of the State

    Bank of India. In 1969, 14 commercial banks in the country were nationalized. In the

    second phase of banking sector reforms, seven more banks were nationalized in 1980.

    With this, 80 percent of the banking sector in India came under the government

    ownership.

    Phase 3

    This phase has introduced many more products and facilities in the banking sector as part

    of the reforms process. In 1991, under the chairmanship of M Narasimham, a committee

    was set up, which worked for the liberalization of banking practices. Now, the country is

    flooded with foreign banks and their ATM stations. Efforts are being put to give a

    satisfactory service to customers. Phone banking and net banking are introduced. The

    entire system became more convenient and swift. Time is given importance in all money

    transactions.

    The financial system of India has shown a great deal of resilience. It is sheltered from

    crises triggered by external macroeconomic shocks, which other East Asian countries

    often suffered. This is all due to a flexible exchange rate regime, the high foreign

    exchange reserve, the not-yet fully convertible capital account, and the limited foreign

    exchange exposure of banks and their customers.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    11/68

    7

    Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

    The central bank of the country is the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). It was established in April

    1935 with a share capital of Rs 5 crore on the basis of the recommendations of the Hilton Young

    Commission. The share capital was divided into fully paid shares of Rs 100 each, which was

    entirely owned by private shareholders in the beginning. The government held shares of nominal

    value of Rs 220,000.

    The RBI commenced operation on April 1, 1935, under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

    The Act (II of 1934) provides the statutory basis of the functioning of the Bank. The Bank was

    constituted to meet the following requirements:

    Regulate the issue of currency notes Maintain reserves with a view to securing monetary stability

    Operate the credit and currency system of the country to its advantage

    Indian Banks Association (IBA)

    The Indian Banks Association (IBA) was formed on September 26, 1946, with 22 members.

    Today, IBA has more than 156 members, such as public sector banks, private sector banks,

    foreign banks having offices in India, urban co-operative banks, developmental financial

    institutions, federations, merchant banks, mutual funds, housing finance corporations, etc.

    The IBA has the following functions:

    Promote sound and progressive banking principles and practices.

    Render assistance and to provide common services to members.

    Organize co-ordination and co-operation on procedural, legal, technical, administrative,

    and professional matters.

    Collect, classify, and circulate statistical and other information.

    Pool expertise towards common purposes such as cost reduction, increased efficiency,

    productivity, and improving systems, procedures, and banking practices.

    Project good public image of banking through publicity and public relations.

    Encourage sports and cultural activities among bank employees.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    12/68

    8

    Banking Activities

    Retail banking, dealing directly with individuals and small businesses.

    Business banking, providing services to mid-market businesses.

    Corporate banking, directed at large business entities.

    Private banking, providing wealth management services to high net worth individuals.

    Investment banking, activities in the financial markets, such as "underwrite" (guarantee

    the sale of) stock and bond issues, trade for their own accounts, make markets, and advise

    corporations on capital market activities like mergers and acquisitions.

    Merchant banking is the private equity activity of investment banks.

    Financial services, global financial institutions that engage in multiple activities such as

    banking and insurance.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    13/68

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    14/68

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    15/68

    11

    1.6 Four categories, on the basis of age of overdue, as under

    Standard Assets

    Standard asset is one which does not disclose any problem and which does not carry more

    than normal risk attached to business. Thus, in general, all the current loans, agricultural and

    non-agricultural loans which have not become NPA may be treated as standard asset.

    Sub-Standard Assets

    A Non-performing asset may be classified as sub-standard on the basis of the following

    criteria. (a) An asset which has remained overdue for a period not exceeding 3 years in

    respect of both agricultural and non-agricultural loans should be treated as substandard. (b) In

    case of all types of term loans, where installments are overdue for a period not exceeding 3years, the entire outstanding in term loan should be treated as sub-standard. (c) An asset,

    where the terms and conditions of the loans regarding payment of interest and repayment of

    principal have been renegotiated or rescheduled, after commencement of production, should

    be classified as sub-standard and should remain so in such category for at least one year of

    satisfactory performance under the renegotiated or rescheduled terms. In other words, the

    classification of an asset should not be upgraded merely as a result of rescheduling unless

    there is satisfactory compliance of the above condition.

    Doubtful Asset

    A Non-Performing Asset may be classified as doubtful on the basis of following criteria: As

    asset which has remained overdue for a period exceeding 3 years in respect of both

    agricultural and non-agricultural loans should be treated as doubtful. In case of all types of

    term loans, where installments are overdue for more than 3 years, the entire outstanding in

    term loan should be treated as doubtful. As in the case of sub-standard assets, rescheduling

    does not entitle a bank to upgrade the quality of advance automatically.

    Loss Asset

    Loss assets are those where loss is identified by the bank/ auditor/ RBI/ NABARD inspectors

    but the amount has not been written off wholly or partly. In other words, an asset which is

    considered unrealizable and/ or of such little value that its continuance as a doubtful asset is

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    16/68

    12

    not worthwhile, should be treated as a loss asset. Such loss assets will include overdue loans

    in cases (a) where decrease or execution petitions have been time barred or documents are

    lost or no other legal proof is available to claim the debt, (b) where the members and their

    sureties are declared insolvent or have died leaving no tangible assets, (c) where the members

    have left the area of operation of the society (refers to the borrower in whose name the

    respective Loan Account with SCB/ CCB) leaving no property and their sureties have also no

    means to pay the dues (d) where the loan is fictitious or when gross misutilisation is noticed,

    and (e) amounts which cannot be recovered in case of liquidated societies.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    17/68

    13

    1.7 Underlying reason for NPA in India

    An internal study conducted by RBI shows that in the order of prominence ,the following

    factor contribute to NPAs.

    Internal Factor

    Diversion of funds for

    - Expansion/diversification /modernization

    - Taking up new project

    - Helping /promoting associate concerns time/cost overrun during the project

    implementation stage

    Business Failure

    Inefficiency in management

    Slackness in credit management and monitoring

    Inappropriate Technology/technical problem

    Lack of coordination among lenders

    External Factor

    Recession

    Input/power storage

    Price escalation

    Exchange rate fluctuation

    Accidents and natural calamities ,etc.

    Changes in government policies in excise/ import duties, pollution control orders, etc.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    18/68

    14

    Some other factors also affected to NPA which are mention below in detail:

    Liberalization of economy/removal of restriction/reduction of tariffs

    A large number of NPA borrowers were unable to compete in a competitive market in

    which lower prices and greater choices were available to consumers. Further, borrowers

    operating in specific industries have suffered due to political, fiscal and social compulsions,

    compounding pressures from liberalization.

    Lax monitoring of credit and failure to recognize Early Warnings Signals

    It has been stated that approval of loan proposal is generally thorough and each proposal

    passes through many levels before approval is granted. However, the monitoring of

    sometimes complex credit files has not received the attention it needed which meant that

    early warning signals were not recognized and standard assets slipped to NPA category

    without banks being able to take proactive measures to prevent this. partly due to this

    reason, adverse trends in borrowers performance were not noted and the position further

    deteriorated before action was taken.

    Over optimistic promoters

    Promoters were often optimistic in setting up large projects and in some cases were not fully

    above board in their intentions. screening procedures did not always highlight these issues.

    often projects were set up with the expectation that part of the funding would be arranged

    from the capital markets which were booming at the time of the project appraisal. When the

    capital markets subsequently crashed, the requisite funds could never be raised, promoter

    often lost interest and lenders were left stranded with incomplete/unviable projects.

    Directed lending

    Loans to some segment were dictated by Governments policies than commercial

    imperatives.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    19/68

    15

    Highly Leveraged borrowers

    Some borrowers were under capitalized and over burdened with debt to absorb the changing

    economic situation in the country. Operating within a protected marked resulted economic

    situation in the country. Operating within a protected market resulted in low appreciation of

    commercial/market risk.

    Funding mismatch

    There are said to be many cases where loans granted for short terms were used to fund long

    term transactions.

    High Cost of Funds

    Interest rates as high as 20% were not uncommon. Coupled with high leveraging and falling

    Denmark, borrowers could not continue to service high cost debt.

    Willful Defaulters

    There are a number of borrowers who have strategically defaulted on their debt service

    obligation realizing that the legal resource available to creditors is slow in achieving results.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    20/68

    16

    1.8 NPA Rules for bank

    General Rules

    In line with the international practices and as per the recommendations made by the

    committee on Financial system (Chairman Shri M. Narasimham), the Reserve Bank of

    India has introduced, in a phased manner, prudential norms for income recognition,

    asset classification and provisioning for the advances portfolio of the banks so as to

    move towards greater consistency and transparency in the published accounts.

    The policy of income recognition should be objective and based on record of recovery

    rather than on any subjective considerations. Likewise, the classification of assets of

    banks has to be done on the basis of objective criteria which would ensure a uniform

    and consistent application of norms. Also, the provisioning should be made on the basis

    of classification of assets based on the period for which the asset has remained non

    performing / overdue as also availability of security and its realizable value.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    21/68

    17

    1.8.1 Norms for treating loans / advances as NPA

    Treatment of agricultural advances

    In respect of advances granted for agricultural purposes where interest payment is on

    half-yearly basis synchronizing with harvest, banks should adopt the agricultural season as

    the basis. In other words, if interest has not been paid during the last two seasons of

    harvest (covering two half-years) after the principal has become overdue then such an

    advance should be treated as NPA. This norm is applicable to all direct agricultural

    advances listed in the Annexure. In respect of agricultural advances other than those

    specified in the Annexure, identification of NPA would be done on the same basis as non-

    agricultural advances which at present is the 180 days delinquency norm. Crop loans for

    each season, viz., Rabi and Kharif has to be treated as separate account and IRAC norms

    have to be applied accordingly.

    Treatment of advances for allied agricultural activities as well as non farm sector

    Credit facilities granted for other allied agricultural activities as well as for non-farm

    sector activities should be treated as NPA if amounts of installments of principal and / or

    interest remain outstanding for a period of two quarters from the due date.

    Project / Housing Loans, etc

    In case of projects (industry, plantation, etc.) where moratorium is given for payment,

    [loan becomes due only after moratorium or gestation period is over] such a loan becomes

    overdue if installment is not paid on due date. Similarly, in the case of housing loans or

    similar advances granted to staff members where interest is payable after recovery of

    principal, such loans should be classified as NPA when there is a default in repayment of

    principal on due date of payment and overdue criteria will be the basis for classification of

    assets.

    Consortium advances

    In respect of consortium advances each bank is required to classify the borrowal accounts

    according to its own recovery i.e., on the record of recovery of the individual member

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    22/68

    18

    banks. The banks participating in the consortium should therefore, arrange to get their

    share of recovery transferred from the lead bank of the consortium.

    Treatment of different facilities to borrower as overdue (NPA)

    Short-term agricultural advances are granted by SCBs / CCBs to CCBs PACS respectively

    for the purpose of on-lending. In respect of such advances as well as advances for other

    purposes, if any, granted under on-lending system, only that particular facility which

    became irregular should be treated as NPA and not all the other facilities granted to them.

    Crop loans for each season, viz., Rabi and Kharif have to be treated as separate account

    and accordingly IRAC norms have to be applied. In respect of all other direct loans and

    advances granted to a borrower, all such loans will become NPA even if one loan A/c

    becomes NPA.

    Out of order status

    In respect of cash credit / over draft facility an account should be treated as out of order,

    if the outstanding balance remains continuously in excess of the sanctioned limit / drawing

    power. In cases where the outstanding balance in the principal operating account is less

    than the sanctioned limit / drawing power, but there are no credits continuously for six

    months as on the date of Balance Sheet or credits are not enough to cover the interest

    debited during the same period, these accounts should be treated as out of order.

    Overdue

    Any amount due to the bank under any credit facility is overdue, if it is not paid on

    due date fixed by the bank.

    Performance of the account as on the date of Balance Sheet

    The performance of the account as on the date of Balance Sheet only has to be taken

    into account for the purpose of NPA. Subsequent developments should not be

    considered for determining NPAs. 2.10. If interest and / or installment of principle has

    remained unpaid for any two quarters out of the four quarters ending 31 March of the

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    23/68

    19

    year concerned, the credit facility should be treated as NPA although the default may

    not be continuously for two quarters during the year.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    24/68

    20

    1.8.2 Provisioning Norms on the basis of Asset Classification

    Need for provisioning

    Provisioning is necessary considering the erosion in the value of security charged to

    the banks over a period of time. Therefore, after the assets of CCBs / SCBs are

    classified into various categories (viz., standard, sub-standard, doubtful and loss

    assets) necessary provision has to be made for the same. The details of provisioning

    requirements in respect of various categories of assets are mentioned below

    Standard Asset

    When the IRAC norms were introduced in the year 1996-97, no provisioning was

    required in respect of standard assets. From the year ended 31 March 2000, banks are

    required to make provision on Standard assets at a minimum of 0.25% of the total

    outstanding in this category. The provision made on Standard assets may not be

    reckoned as erosion in the value of assets and will form part of owned funds of the

    bank. The advances granted against term deposits. National Savings Certificate

    (NSC) eligible for surrender, Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) Indira Vikas Patra (IVP), Life

    policies, Staff loans would attract provision of 0.25% prescribed for Standard assets.

    The provision towards standard assets need not be netted from gross advances and

    should be shown separately as Contingent provision against Standard Assets under

    Other liabilities and provisions others.

    Sub-standard Asset

    A general provision of 10% of total outstanding in this category may be made.

    Doubtful Assets

    100% is to be made to the extent to which the advance is not covered by realizable

    value of securities to which the bank has a valid recourse and the realizable value is

    estimated on a realistic basis.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    25/68

    21

    Over and above item (a), provision is to be made depending upon the period for

    which an asset has remained overdue, 20% to 50% of the secured portion on the

    following basis :

    Loss Asset

    The entire loss asset should be written off. If the assets are permitted to be retained in

    the books for any reasons, 100% of the outstanding thereof should be fully provided

    for.

    Provision for other assets/ outstanding liabilities

    Loss in respect of cash balances/ deposits with other banks, amounts in branchadjustment accounts, frauds and embezzlements, and depreciation on building, furniture

    and vehicles, etc. may be assessed and fully provided for as per the existing practice.

    With a view to ensuring full disclosure on the profitability and net worth of the bank,

    Items not provided for or items of liabilities where inadequate provisions have been made

    (e.g. Gratuity, Provident Fund, Income Tax, Interest accrued on deposits/ borrowings,

    etc.), Inspecting Officers should specify the same to arrive at the unprovided for

    expenditure and treat them as actual expenditure for the purpose of arriving at the net

    worth.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    26/68

    22

    1.8.3 Credit growth and NPA life cycle

    NPAs are largely a fallout of banks activities with regard to advance, both at the management

    and implementation levels .The credit appraisal system, monitoring of end -usage of funds

    and recovery procedures.

    It also depends on the overall economic environment, the business cycle and the legal

    environment for recovery of defaulted loan since the overall environment is more or less

    same for all banks, Non performing loans of individual banks are mainly a result of

    management controls and systems put in place by them

    A bank with an efficient credit appraisal and loan recovery system will grow stronger over

    the years. Such banks have good management controls and also inherent strengths in terms

    High credit growth

    Banks with proper credit appraisal recoveryprocess and management control

    Banks with proper appraisal and loose

    management control

    Low levels of NPA s High levels of NPAs

    Inability to grow

    May stagnate unless restructuredInherent strength to grow further

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    27/68

    23

    of a highly motivated staff, good checks and balance, which are further enhance by a

    regulatory and supervisory system.

    As the growth in advances is largely determine by the economic and business environment,

    such banks will be able to push their credit portfolio aggressively, especially when

    economy is booming. Also, as such banks have a diversified credit portfolio, it would act as

    a cushion during economic downturns. This will results in lower NPAs, allowing them to

    grow stronger and even adopt a more aggressive growth strategy and their by, withstand

    marginally higher incidences of default.

    However, a bank without inherent strength will not be able to push their credit portfolio

    the way the want to. They are characterized by poor management control, inadequate credit

    appraisal and even low levels of motivation among the staff. When such banks push their

    advances portfolio, chances of their assets quality deteriorating are higher. since assets

    quality will be visible only after credit disbursal, which it self depends on the regulatory

    definition of NPAs, any deteriorating will be reflected after a time lag. Thus, bank without

    inherent strength will have higher NPA levels, especially when the economy has seen

    above average credit growth.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    28/68

    24

    Reference

    IBA Bulletin (March 2013)

    RBI Bulletin (March 2013)

    Genestenberg, financial management: by C.paramasivan T.subramanin, page no 150

    .S. Mill, Fianancial management:theory and practice by Eugene F. Brigham, page no 206.

    Geoffrey at al. (1969).Management of Money and Finance. Grower Press, New York.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    29/68

    25

    Chapter 2

    Review of Literature

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    30/68

    26

    Review of Literature:-

    A large number of researchers have been studied to the issue of non performing asset (NPA) in

    banking industry .A review of the relevant literature has been described as under: Non

    Performing Assets engender negative impact on banking stability and growth. Issue of NPA and

    its impact on erosion of profit and quality of asset was not seriously considered in Indian banking

    prior to 1991. There are many reasons cited for the alarming level of NPA in Indian banking

    sector. Asset quality was not prime concern in Indian banking sector till 1991, but was mainly

    focused on performance objectives such as opening wide networks/branches, development of

    rural areas, priority sector lending, higher employment generation, etc. The accounting treatment

    also failed to project the problem of NPA, as interest on loan accounts were accounted on accrual

    basis (Siraj K.K. and P. Sudarsanan Pillai, 2012).

    A Committee on Banking Sector Reforms known as Narasimham Committee was set up by RBI

    to study the problems faced by Indian banking sector and to suggest measures revitalize the

    sector. The committee identified NPA as a major threat and recommended prudential measures

    for income recognition, asset classification and provisioning requirements. These measures

    embarked on transformation of the Indian banking sector into a viable, competitive and vibrant

    sector. The committee recommended measures to improve operational flexibility and

    functional autonomy so as to enhance efficiency, productivityand profitability (Chaudhary

    & Singh, 2012).

    The main cause of mounting NPAs in public sector banks is malfunctioning of the banks.

    Narasimham Committee identified the NPAs as one of the possible effects of malfunctioning of

    public sector banks (Ramu, N., 2009).It has been examined that the reason behind the falling

    revenues from traditional sources is 78% of the total NPAs accounted in public sector banks

    (Bhavani Prasad, G. and Veena, V.D., 2011).

    An evaluation of the Indian experience in Financial Sector Reforms Published in the RBI

    Bulletin gives stress to the view that the sustained improvement of the economic activity and

    growth is greatly enhanced by the existence of a financial system developed in terms of both

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    31/68

    27

    operational and allocation efficiency in mobilizing savings and in channelizing them among

    competing demands (G.Rangarajan, 1997).It has been observed that the current banking Scenario

    and the need for the policy change, opines that a major concern addressed by the banking sector

    reform is the improvement of the financial health of banks. The Introduction of prudential norms

    is better financial discipline by ensuring that the banks are alert to the risk profile of their loan

    portfolios (S.P.Talwar (1998).

    The Reserve Bank of India has also conducted a study to ascertain the contributing factors for the

    high level of NPAs in the banks covering 800 top NPA accounts in 33 banks (RBI Bulletin, July

    1999). The study has found that the proportion of problem loans in case of Indian banking sector

    always been very high. The problem loans of these banks, in fact, formed 17.91 percent of their

    gross advances as on March 31, 1989. This proportion did not include the amounts locked up in

    sick industrial units. Hence, the proportion of problem loans indeed was higher.

    However, the NPAs of Indian Banks declined to 17.44 percent as on March 31, 1997 after

    introduction of prudential norms. In case of many of the banks, the decline in ratio of NPAs was

    mainly due to proportionately much higher rise in advances and a lower level of NPAs accretion

    after 1992.

    The study also revealed that the major factors contributing to loans becoming NPAs include

    diversion of funds for expansion, diversification, modernization, undertaking new projects and

    for helping associate concerns. This is coupled with recessionary trend and failure to tap funds in

    the capital and debt markets, business failure (product, marketing, etc.),inefficient management,

    strained labour relations, inappropriate technology/technical problems, product obsolescence,

    recession input/power shortage, price escalation, accidents, natural calamities, Government

    policies like changes in excise duties, pollution control orders, etc.

    The RBI report concluded that reduction of NPAs in banking sector should be treated as a

    national priority issue to make theIndian banking system stronger, resilient and geared to meet

    the challenges of globalization (Parul Khanna, 2012)

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    32/68

    28

    Reference

    "Kesavan's Lamentations".Crossword Bookstores.Retrieved July 2, 2013.

    Terule &Solano, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 164-177

    http://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-

    Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Banks

    http://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Management_&_Technology/Dec13/10.pdf

    http://www.slideshare.net/domariyaganj/nonperformingassetsofbanks

    http://www.crossword.in/books/kesavans-lamentations-rs195-mukundan-m/p-books-8129110105.htmlhttp://www.crossword.in/books/kesavans-lamentations-rs195-mukundan-m/p-books-8129110105.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossword_Bookstoreshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossword_Bookstoreshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossword_Bookstoreshttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Management_&_Technology/Dec13/10.pdfhttp://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Management_&_Technology/Dec13/10.pdfhttp://www.slideshare.net/domariyaganj/nonperformingassetsofbankshttp://www.slideshare.net/domariyaganj/nonperformingassetsofbankshttp://www.slideshare.net/domariyaganj/nonperformingassetsofbankshttp://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Management_&_Technology/Dec13/10.pdfhttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossword_Bookstoreshttp://www.crossword.in/books/kesavans-lamentations-rs195-mukundan-m/p-books-8129110105.html
  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    33/68

    29

    Chapter 3

    Research Methodology

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    34/68

    30

    3.1 Introduction

    The design of any research project requires considerable attention to the research methods and

    the proposed data analysis. Within this section, we have attempted to provide some information

    about how to produce a research design for a study. We offer a basic overview of the research

    methods portion of a research proposal and then some data analysis templates for different types

    of designs. Our goal is not to answer every question, but provide a head start.

    3.2 Problem statement

    The first and for most step happens to be that of selecting and properly defined the

    research problem.

    Research problems refers to some difficulty which a researcher experience in the context

    of either a theoretical or practical situation and wants to obtain a solution for the same.

    The research problem is one which requires a research of to find out the best solution for

    the given problem that is to find out by which goals of action the objective can be attainedoptimally in the context of a given environment.

    As part of the research study we have selected Public sector and private sector bank of

    India. The title of the problem is NPA Impact On Profitability Of Public Sector And

    Private Sector Bank.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    35/68

    31

    3.3 Objective Of The Study

    Objectives are goals or aims ,which the management wishes the organization to achieve .There

    are end points or pole star towards which all business activities like organizing, staffing, directing

    and controlling are directed .Only after defined these and points can the manager determine the of

    organization ,the kind of personnel and their qualification ,the kind of motivation, supervision and

    direction and kind of control techniques, which he must employ to reach these points.

    Primary Objective

    Understand the concept of non performing assets of public sector and private sector banks.

    Study the impact of non performing assets on profitability of public sector and private

    sector banks.

    Offer suggestions based on findings of the study in public sector and private sector bank.

    Secondary Objective

    To know is there any statistically significant relationship between independent variables

    and choice of bank to transact with.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    36/68

    32

    3.4 Scope Of the Study

    The present study of the non performing assets is confined an restricted to the boundary of public

    sector and private sector bank of India.

    3.5 Research Model

    Here,

    IV= Independent variable

    DV= Dependent variable

    Regression analysis was carried out to test the impact of non performing assets on profitability of

    bank. Here, Non performing assets is independent variable and profitability is the dependent

    variable. So, study utilized one DV-one IV liner model.

    IV DV

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    37/68

    33

    3.6 Hypotheses Of The Study

    H0: There is no significant relationship betweenNon performing assets and return on equity

    H1:There is a significant relationship between Non performing assets and return on equity

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    38/68

    34

    3.7 Research Design

    Research designs is a frame work or blue print for conducting research procedure is necessary for

    obtaining information to solve the problem.

    Research designed to assist the decision maker in determining, evaluating and selecting

    the best course of action to take in a given situation.

    Descriptive studies are usually the best methods for collecting information that will

    demonstrate relationships and describe the world as it exists. These types of studies are

    often done before an experiment to know what specific things to manipulate and include

    in an experiment. Descriptive studies are designed primarily to describe what is going or

    what exist.

    In our study we have conducted the descriptive research to study what is the investors

    opinion regarding the attrition rate of investment in the stock market.

    Research design

    ExploratoryDescriptive Causal

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    39/68

    35

    3.8 Source of Data

    Secondary data were used for the study. In this research we covered public and private sectors

    bank which have the non performing assets. for the analysis of impact of non performing assets

    on profitability and for this there must be needed of book value and return on equity. with the help

    of book value we calculate the return on equity. this all the data collected from the capital line.

    3.9 Tools Used for Analysis

    In research study there is regression analysis used with the model of one DV and one IV. There is

    One dependent variable and One Independent variable. Independent variable is NPA and

    Dependent variable is Profitability in our research Study.

    3.10 Sample Size

    In this research study we have to taken public sector banks and privet sector banks for the study

    we have selected 74 banks for the study.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    40/68

    36

    Chapter 4

    Data Analysis

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    41/68

    37

    4.1 Private and Public Sector Banks

    H0:There is no significant relationship betweenNon- performing assets and return on equity of

    bank.

    H1:There is a significant relationship between Non- performing assets and return on equity of

    bank.

    Table 4.1.1 ANOVA Result For NPA

    Model Sum squares Df Mean square F Sig

    Regression 1296.541 1 1296.541 22.835 0.000a

    Residual 22030.075 388 56.779

    Total 23326.616 389

    Note:*P < 0.05

    This model is fit because the significant level is less than 0.05. There is impact of Non

    Performing Assets on Return on equity of banks.

    Table 4.1.2 Coefficient For NPA

    Note:*P < 0.05

    In above table of coefficient there is significant is 0.000. So Null hypotheses is not

    excepted so there is impact of Non Performing Assets on Return on equity of banks.

    Model unstandardize

    coefficientB

    Un standardizeCoefficient

    Std. error

    t Sig.

    1(constant) 5.249 0.774 6.781 0.000

    NPA -0.276 0.058 -4.779 0.000

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    42/68

    38

    Table 4.1.3 Model Summary For NPA

    Note:*P < 0.05

    This Model is fit because significant level is less than 0.000 so there is impact of Non

    performing Assets on Return on equity of banks.

    Model R RSquare

    AdjustedR

    Square

    Std.Errorof the

    Estimate

    Change StatisticsR

    Square

    Change

    F

    Change

    Df

    1

    Df2 Sig. F

    change

    1 0.236a 0.056 0.053 7.53515 0.056 22.835 1 388 0.000

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    43/68

    39

    4.2 Public sector bank

    H0:There is no significant relationship betweenNon- performing assets and return on equity of

    Public sector bank.

    H1:There is a significant relationship between Non- performing assets and return on equity of

    Public sector bank

    Table 4.2.1 Descriptive Statistics

    There is no any analysis from the descriptive statistics so further study is require.

    Table no 4.2.2ANOVA Result For NPA

    Model Sum squares Df Mean square F Sig

    Regression 10.752 1 10.752 23.431 0.000

    Residual 63.326 138 0.459

    Total 74.078 139

    Note:*P < 0.05

    This model is fit because the significant level is less than 0.000. There is impact of Non

    Performing Assets on Return on equity of public and private sector banks.

    Variable Mean Std.

    Deviation

    N

    NPA 1.1514 0.73002 140

    ROE 15.4703 5.29179 140

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    44/68

    40

    Table no 4.2.3 Coefficient For NPA

    Model un

    standardize

    coefficient

    B

    Un standardize

    Coefficient

    Std. error

    T Sig.

    1(constant) 1.965 0.177 11.070 0.000

    NPA -0.053 0.011 -4.841 0.000

    Note:*P < 0.05

    In above table of coefficient there is significant is 0.000. So Null hypotheses is not

    excepted so there is impact of Non Performing Assets on profitability of public and

    private sector banks.

    Table 4.2.4 Model Summary

    Note:*P < 0.05

    This Model is fit because significant level is less than 0.000 so there is impact of Non

    performing Assets on profitability of public and private sector banks.

    Model R R

    Square

    Adjusted

    RSquare

    Std.Error

    of theEstimate

    Change Statistics

    RSquare

    Change

    FChange

    Df1

    Df2 Sig. Fchange

    1 0.381a 0.145 0.149 0.67741 0.145 23.431 1 138 0.000

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    45/68

    41

    4.3 Private sector bank

    H0:There is no significant relationship betweenNon- performing assets and return on equity of

    private sector bank.

    H1:There is a significant relationship between Non- performing assets and return on equity of

    private sector bank.

    Table 4.3.1 Descriptive statistics

    Table 4.3.2 ANOVA Result For NPA

    Model Sum squares Df Mean square F Sig

    Regression 1417.475 1 1417.475 16.225 0.000

    Residual 21666.137 248 87.363

    Total 23083.612 249

    Note:*P < 0.05

    This model is fit because the significant level is less than 0.05. There is impact of

    Non Performing Assets on Return on equity of banks.

    Table 4.3.3 Coefficient For NPA

    Model un standardizecoefficient

    B

    Un standardizeCoefficient

    Std. error

    T Sig.

    1(constant) 6.115 1.070 5.716 0.000

    NPA -376 0.093 -4.028 0.000

    Note:*P < 0.05

    In above table of coefficient there is significant is 0.000. So Null hypotheses is

    not excepted so there is impact of Non Performing Assets on profitability of

    public and private sector banks.

    Variable Mean Std.

    Deviation

    N

    NPA 2.5234 9.62836 250

    ROE 9.5527 6.34682 250

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    46/68

    42

    Table 4.3.4Model Summary For NPA

    Note:*P < 0.05

    This Model is fit because significant level is less than 0.05 so there is impact of Non performing

    Assets on profitability of public and private sector banks.

    Model R R

    Square

    Adjusted

    RSquare

    Std.Error

    of theEstimate

    Change Statistics

    RSquare

    Change

    FChange

    Df1 Df2 Sig. Fchange

    1 248a 0.061 0.058 9.34684 0.061 16.225 1 248 0.000

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    47/68

    43

    Chapter 5

    Findings And Suggestions

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    48/68

    44

    5.1 Findings

    Because of mismanagement in bank there is a positive relation between Total Advances,

    Net Profits and NPA of bank which is not good.

    Positive relation between NPA & profits are due to wrong choice of clients by Banks. There is an adverse effect on the Liquidity of Bank.

    Bank is unable to give loans to the new customers due to lack of funds which arises due

    to NPA

    5.2 Suggestion

    Advances provided by banks need to be done pre-sanctioning evaluation and post-

    disbursement control so that NPA can decrease.

    Good management needed on the side of banks to decrease the level of NPA.

    Proper selection of borrowers & follow ups required to get timely payment.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    49/68

    45

    Chapter 6

    Conclusion

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    50/68

    46

    NPAs reflect the overall performance of the banks.

    The NPAs have always been a big worry for the banks in india. The Indian banking

    sector faced a serious problem of NPAs. .

    A high level of NPAs suggests high probability of a large number of credit defaults that

    affect the profitability and liquidity of banks.

    The extent of NPAs has comparatively higher in public sectors banks. To improve the

    efficiency and profitability, the NPAs have to be scheduled.

    Various steps have been taken by government to reduce the NPAs. It is highly impossible

    to have zero percentage NPAs. But at least Indian banks should take care to ensure that

    they give loans to creditworthy customers.

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    51/68

    47

    Chapter 7

    Bibliography

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    52/68

    48

    < 20/2/2014,

    2:34 >

    Reference

    Terule &Solano, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 164-177

    S. Mill, Fianancial management:theory and practice by Eugene F. Brigham, page no 206

    Deloof, M., and Jegers, M. (1996), Trade credit, product quality, and intra group trade: Some

    European evidence, Financial Management, Vol. 25, pp. 945-968.DOI:10.2307/3665806

    Genestenberg, financial management :by C.paramasivan T.subramanin, page no 150

    http://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Commerce_&_Management/Jul12/5.pdfhttp://ijarcsms.com/docs/paper/volume2/issue1/V2I1-0032.pdfhttp://www.capitaline.com/user/framepage.asp?id=1http://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Management_&_Technology/Dec13/10.pdfhttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/Ahttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665806http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665806http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665806http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665806http://www.academia.edu/4700608/Ahttp://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Management_&_Technology/Dec13/10.pdfhttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.academia.edu/4700608/A_Study_of_Non-Performing_Assets_on_Selected_Public_and_Private_Sector_Bankshttp://www.capitaline.com/user/framepage.asp?id=1http://ijarcsms.com/docs/paper/volume2/issue1/V2I1-0032.pdfhttp://www.abhinavjournal.com/images/Commerce_&_Management/Jul12/5.pdf
  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    53/68

    49

    Chapter 8

    Annexure

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    54/68

    50

    Table 8.1:Public sector bank

    No Name

    NPA

    2013

    EPS RS.

    2013

    book value

    2013 ROE 2013

    1 Allahabad Bank 3.19 22.68 209.92 10.80411585

    2 Andhra Bank 2.45 22.19 150.85 14.70997683 Bank of Baroda 1.28 102.47 756.64 13.54276803

    4 Bank of India 2.06 41.4 381.07 10.8641457

    5 Bank of Maha 0.52 10.21 70.88 14.40462754

    6 Canara Bank 2.18 62.62 515.68 12.14318957

    7 Central Bank 2.9 7.61 113.23 6.720833701

    8 Corporation Bank 1.19 90.9 625.58 14.53051568

    9 Dena Bank 1.39 22.35 140.24 15.9369652

    10 E X I M Bank 0 2.43 24.52 9.910277325

    11 I O B 2.5 5.81 133.2 4.361861862

    12 IDBI Bank 1.58 13.58 146.11 9.29436725813 Indian Bank 2.26 34.68 242.89 14.27806826

    14 N A B A R D 0.01 4.52 101.38 4.458473072

    15 Oriental Bank 2.27 43.95 414.69 10.59827823

    16 Pun. & Sind Bank 2.16 12.14 145.56 8.340203353

    17 Punjab Natl.Bank 2.35 129.73 884.04 14.67467535

    18 S B T 1.46 119.76 873 13.71821306

    19 St Bk of Bikaner 2.27 101.71 680.59 14.94438649

    20 St Bk of Hyderab 1.61 6,025.16 36779.13 16.38200795

    21 St Bk of India 2.1 200.71 1445.6 13.88420033

    22 St Bk of Mysore 2.69 87.04 804.44 10.8199492823 St Bk of Patiala 1.62 223.33 1812.36 12.32260699

    24 Syndicate Bank 0.76 32.16 158.91 20.23787049

    25 UCO Bank 3.17 7.56 97.19 7.778578043

    26 Union Bank (I) 1.61 34.61 262.9 13.16470141

    27 United Bank (I) 2.87 7.98 119.08 6.701377225

    28 Vijaya Bank 1.3 8.98 82.66 10.86377934

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    55/68

    51

    Table 8.2: Privet sector bank

    No Name

    NPA%

    2013

    EPS

    Rs.2013

    book value

    2013 ROE 201329 AB Bank 8.98 2.16 20.3 10.64039409

    30 Abu Dhabi Comm. 0 0.84 15.09 5.566600398

    31 Akola Janat. Com 0 26.76 425.96 6.282280026

    32 Amer. Exp. Bank 1.87 0 7.38 0

    33 Antwerp Diamond 0 0.89 14.36 6.197771588

    34 Axis Bank 0.36 107.59 707.51 15.2068522

    35 Bank of Bah &Kuw 3.16 0.86 14.23 6.043569923

    36 Barclays Bank 1.74 0 9.24 0

    37 BNP Paribas 0 1.75 20.59 8.499271491

    38 Catholic Bank 1.12 7.54 150.56 5.00797024439 Citibank N. A. 1.47 7.26 45.28 16.0335689

    40 City Union Bank 0.63 6.62 34.58 19.14401388

    41 Cosmos Cp Bank 4.67 30.82 500.38 6.159318918

    42 Credit Agricole 0 1.58 17.98 8.787541713

    43 DBS Bank 2.37 1.98 20.07 9.865470852

    44 DCB Bank 0.75 4.08 37.83 10.7850912

    45 Deutsche Bank 0.13 2.52 19.29 13.06376361

    46 Dhanlaxmi Bank 3.36 0.31 85.81 0.361263256

    47 Federal Bank 0.98 47.47 371.77 12.76864728

    48 Greater Bombay 2.55 9.15 97.51 9.38365295949 HDFC Bank 0.2 27.33 152.2 17.95663601

    50 Hongkong & Shang 0.33 4.3 32.1 13.39563863

    51 ICICI Bank 0.77 69.63 578.18 12.0429624

    52 IndusInd Bank 0.31 19.78 141.66 13.96301002

    53 ING Vysya Bank 0.03 38.69 292.1 13.24546388

    54 J & K Bank 0.14 209.1 1003.24 20.8424704

    55 J P Morgan Chase 0 2.16 18.51 11.66936791

    56 Kapol Co-op Bank 4.47 1.83 36.42 5.024711697

    57 Karnataka Bank 1.51 17.8 151.69 11.73445843

    58 Karur Vysya Bank 0.37 48.97 287.85 17.0123328159 Kokan Merchanti 2.83 6.52 177.16 3.680289004

    60 Kotak Mah. Bank 0.64 18.13 126.53 14.32861772

    61 Lak. Vilas Bank 2.43 8.88 96.02 9.248073318

    62 Mahanagar Co-op 0.72 3.71 72.2 5.138504155

    63 Maratha Sahakari 14.18 4.1 236.48 1.73376184

    64 Mogaveera Co-op 4.74 15.88 399.42 3.975764859

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    56/68

    52

    65 Mumbai Dist.Bank 4.77 297.04 9218.44 3.222237168

    66 Oversea-Ch. Bank 100 0 9.78 0

    67 Pun. & Mah. Bank 0.16 11.33 107.22 10.56705838

    68 Ratnakar Bank 0.11 3.55 63.48 5.592312539

    69 Royal Bank 0.29 13.17 167.55 7.860340197

    70 Sh.Arihant Co-op 0 7.61 122.5 6.212244898

    71 Shamrao Vithal 0.74 25.21 195.33 12.90636359

    72 South Ind.Bank 0.78 3.64 21.41 17.00140121

    73 South Ind.Co-op 51.7 0 20.44 0

    74 St Bk of Mauriti 2.18 0.29 11.37 2.55057168

    75 Stand.Chart.Bank 1.63 10.86 66.56 16.31610577

    76 Stand.Chart.PLC 1.63 10.86 66.56 16.31610577

    77 T N Merc. Bank 0.66 15,603.21 72216.79 21.60606972

    78 Yes Bank 0.01 35.3 161.94 21.79819686

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    57/68

    53

    Table 8.3: Public sector bank

    No Name NPA 2012 EPS 2012

    Book value

    2012 ROE 2012

    1 Allahabad Bank 0.98 36.36 192.92 18.84719

    2 Andhra Bank 0.91 23.14 133.66 17.312583 Bank of Baroda 0.54 118.72 666.3 17.8178

    4 Bank of India 1.47 45.49 343.35 13.24887

    5 Bank of Maha 0.84 5.85 63.77 9.173593

    6 Canara Bank 1.46 72.3 465.57 15.52935

    7 Central Bank 3.09 4.89 221.41 2.208572

    8 Corporation Bank 0.87 98.34 558.69 17.60189

    9 Dena Bank 1.01 22.46 122.59 18.32123

    10 E X I M Bank 0 2.94 26.98 10.89696

    11 I O B 1.35 12.45 135.34 9.199054

    12 IDBI Bank 1.61 15.42 137.46 11.2178113 Indian Bank 1.33 38.35 214.94 17.84219

    14 N A B A R D 0.02 5.45 124.73 4.369438

    15 Oriental Bank 2.21 37.85 379.94 9.962099

    16 Pun. & Sind Bank 1.19 18.01 141.73 12.70726

    17 Punjab Natl.Bank 1.52 140.43 777.34 18.06545

    18 S B T 1.54 99.17 773.23 12.82542

    19 St Bk of Bikaner 1.92 90.79 594.98 15.25934

    20 St Bk of Hyderab 1.3 6,178.84 31314.07 19.73183

    21 St Bk of India 1.82 170.05 1251.06 13.59247

    22 St Bk of Mysore 1.93 77.26 729.21 10.5950323 St Bk of Patiala 1.35 267.33 1622.04 16.4811

    24 Syndicate Bank 0.96 21.2 133.5 15.88015

    25 UCO Bank 1.96 15.84 94.72 16.72297

    26 Union Bank (I) 1.7 30.94 235.91 13.11517

    27 United Bank (I) 1.72 14.69 114.65 12.81291

    28 Vijaya Bank 1.72 8.65 76.17 11.35618

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    58/68

    54

    Table 8.4:Privet sector bank

    No Name 2012 EPS 2012 Book value 2012

    29 AB Bank 0 2.21 18.14 12.18302

    30 Abu Dhabi Comm. 0 0.75 14.25 5.263158

    31 Akola Janat. Com 0 22.33 419.56 5.32224232 Amer. Exp. Bank 1.19 0.06 7.99 0.750939

    33 Antwerp Diamond 1.96 0.86 13.47 6.384558

    34 Axis Bank 0.27 100.03 552 18.12138

    35 Bank of Bah &Kuw 2.49 1.02 13.37 7.62902

    36 Barclays Bank 1.45 0 9.34 0

    37 BNP Paribas 0.07 0.76 18.84 4.03397

    38 Catholic Bank 1.1 8 167.68 4.770992

    39 Citibank N. A. 0.9 5.13 41.75 12.28743

    40 City Union Bank 0.44 6.7 30.45 22.00328

    41 Cosmos Cp Bank 4.79 39.03 625.52 6.23960942 Credit Agricole 0 2.77 17.76 15.59685

    43 DBS Bank 0.6 2.3 18.09 12.71421

    44 DCB Bank 0.57 2.29 33.39 6.858341

    45 Deutsche Bank 0.09 2.27 17.62 12.88309

    46 Dhanlaxmi Bank 0.66 0 85.54 0

    47 Federal Bank 0.53 43.95 333.29 13.18671

    48 Greater Bombay 0.84 10.73 91.77 11.69227

    49 HDFC Bank 0.18 21.32 127.52 16.71895

    50 Hongkong & Shang 0.62 4.42 31.7 13.94322

    51 ICICI Bank 0.73 54.17 523.98 10.33818

    52 IndusInd Bank 0.27 16.8 96.46 17.41655

    53 ING Vysya Bank 0.18 29.67 258.11 11.4951

    54 J & K Bank 0.15 160.22 844.13 18.98049

    55 J P Morgan Chase 0 1.6 16.35 9.785933

    56 Kapol Co-op Bank 1.25 5.18 34.86 14.85944

    57 Karnataka Bank 2.11 12.5 137.99 9.058627

    58 Karur Vysya Bank 0.33 44.54 252.68 17.62704

    59 Kokan Merchanti 4.24 2.66 168.71 1.57667

    60 Kotak Mah. Bank 0.61 14.55 107.28 13.56264

    61 Lak. Vilas Bank 1.74 10.41 90.14 11.5487

    62 Mahanagar Co-op 0.05 3.6 75.36 4.77707

    63 Maratha Sahakari 13.55 4.2 208.86 2.010916

    64 Mogaveera Co-op 3.82 23.84 694.66 3.431895

    65 Mumbai Dist.Bank 0.98 290.48 10944.17 2.654199

    66 Oversea-Ch. Bank 100 0 9.81 0

    67 Pun. & Mah. Bank 0.47 9.13 113.87 8.017915

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    59/68

    55

    68 Ratnakar Bank 0.2 3.01 53.13 5.665349

    69 Royal Bank 0.74 28.39 174.07 16.30953

    70 Sh.Arihant Co-op 0 6.18 129.84 4.759704

    71 Shamrao Vithal 0 22.81 176.2 12.94552

    72 South Ind.Bank 0.28 3.45 17.84 19.33857

    73 South Ind.Co-op 4.33 3.44 80.33 4.282335

    74 St Bk of Mauriti 0 0 12.48 0

    75 Stand.Chart.Bank 0.7 25.68 193.52 13.26995

    76 Stand.Chart.PLC 0.7 25.68 193.52 13.26995

    77 T N Merc. Bank 0.45 10,951.07 58387.14 18.75596

    78 Yes Bank 0.05 27.03 132.49 20.40154

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    60/68

    56

    Table 8.5:Public sector bank

    No Name

    NPA

    2011 EPS 2011

    Book value

    2011 2011

    1 Allahabad Bank 0.79 28.21 160.5 17.576324

    2 Andhra Bank 0.38 21.75 116.02 18.74676783 Bank of Baroda 0.35 105.3 535.72 19.6557903

    4 Bank of India 0.91 44.36 291.86 15.199068

    5 Bank of Maha 1.32 5.81 61.02 9.52146837

    6 Canara Bank 1.1 89.07 405 21.9925926

    7 Central Bank 0.65 27.13 231.2 11.7344291

    8 Corporation Bank 0.46 92.16 481.86 19.1258872

    9 Dena Bank 1.22 17.98 103.76 17.3284503

    10 E X I M Bank 0.2 2.92 27.08 10.7828656

    11 I O B 1.19 16.52 131.96 12.5189451

    12 IDBI Bank 1.06 16.2 128.69 12.588390713 Indian Bank 0.53 37.62 184.44 20.396877

    14 N A B A R D 0.02 6.4 180.4 3.54767184

    15 Oriental Bank 0.98 49.82 349.97 14.2355059

    16 Pun. & Sind Bank 0.56 22.55 127.74 17.6530452

    17 Punjab Natl.Bank 0.85 136.37 632.49 21.5608152

    18 S B T 0.98 142.6 692.71 20.5858151

    19 St Bk of Bikaner 0.83 106.76 570.16 18.7245685

    20 St Bk of Hyderab 0.87 5,543.47 25615.23 21.6413048

    21 St Bk of India 1.63 126.27 1023.4 12.3382842

    22 St Bk of Mysore 1.38 105.35 662.28 15.907169223 St Bk of Patiala 1.21 218.53 1389.4 15.728372

    24 Syndicate Bank 0.97 17.68 116.12 15.2256287

    25 UCO Bank 1.84 13.68 82 16.6829268

    26 Union Bank (I) 1.19 38.3 211.31 18.1250296

    27 United Bank (I) 1.42 12.88 103.46 12.4492558

    28 Vijaya Bank 1.52 8.67 70.31 12.3311051

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    61/68

    57

    Table 8.6:Privet sector bank

    No Name 2011 EPS 2011

    Book value

    2011 ROE 2011

    29 AB Bank 0 1.44 15.93 9.0395480230 Abu Dhabi Comm. 2.89 1.3 21.99 5.91177808

    31 Akola Janat. Com 1.55 17.36 552.33 3.14304854

    32 Amer. Exp. Bank 1.5 0.42 7.64 5.4973822

    33 Antwerp Diamond 3.04 0 12.61 0

    34 Axis Bank 0.29 80.21 462.77 17.3325842

    35 Bank of Bah &Kuw 0.52 2.45 18.16 13.4911894

    36 Barclays Bank 1.46 0.19 9.69 1.96078431

    37 BNP Paribas 0 1.76 18.07 9.73990039

    38 Catholic Bank 1.74 3.72 161.26 2.30683368

    39 Citibank N. A. 1.21 3.81 39 9.7692307740 City Union Bank 0.52 5.17 24.85 20.804829

    41 Cosmos Cp Bank 1.54 91.76 1302.48 7.0450218

    42 Credit Agricole 0 0.42 12.12 3.46534653

    43 DBS Bank 0.331 1.34 18.89 7.09370037

    44 DCB Bank 0.96 1.07 28.1 3.80782918

    45 Deutsche Bank 0.23 1.74 15.35 11.3355049

    46 Dhanlaxmi Bank 0.3 2.98 99.21 3.00372946

    47 Federal Bank 0.6 32.94 298.34 11.0410941

    48 Greater Bombay 1.02 7.77 100.09 7.76301329

    49 HDFC Bank 0.19 81.72 545.46 14.9818502

    50 Hongkong & Shang 0.91 3.4 28.89 11.7687781

    51 ICICI Bank 1.11 42.97 478.29 8.98408915

    52 IndusInd Bank 0.28 12.07 81.92 14.7338867

    53 ING Vysya Bank 0.39 25.85 208.13 12.420122

    54 J & K Bank 0.2 122.55 717.4 17.0825202

    55 J P Morgan Chase 0 1.98 16.03 12.3518403

    56 Kapol Co-op Bank 0 0.67 40.3 1.66253102

    57 Karnataka Bank 1.62 10.4 129.07 8.05764314

    58 Karur Vysya Bank 0.07 41.77 223.78 18.6656538

    59 Kokan Merchanti 0 6.89 167.54 4.11245076

    60 Kotak Mah. Bank 0.72 11.04 92.23 11.9700748

    61 Lak. Vilas Bank 0.9 9.95 83.23 11.954824

    62 Mahanagar Co-op 1.12 3.72 88.42 4.20719294

    63 Maratha Sahakari 8.11 4.84 246.22 1.96572171

    64 Mogaveera Co-op 5.94 15.37 1304.25 1.17845505

    65 Mumbai Dist.Bank 1.52 262.48 1106.81 23.7150008

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    62/68

    58

    66 Oversea-Ch. Bank 0 0.11 10.23 1.07526882

    67 Pun. & Mah. Bank 0 10.58 139.9 7.56254467

    68 Ratnakar Bank 0.36 0.54 50.42 1.07100357

    69 Royal Bank 1.65 10.73 145.68 7.36545854

    70 Sh.Arihant Co-op 1.13 6.08 142.56 4.26487093

    71 Shamrao Vithal 0 18.22 159.09 11.4526369

    72 South Ind.Bank 0.29 2.51 14.99 16.7444963

    73 South Ind.Co-op 0 5.6 81.3 6.88806888

    74 St Bk of Mauriti 0 0.61 17.08 3.57142857

    75 Stand.Chart.Bank 0.27 30.47 175.23 17.388575

    76 Stand.Chart.PLC 0.27 30.47 175.23 17.388575

    77 T N Merc. Bank 0.27 8,796.07 48786.07 18.0298803

    78 Yes Bank 0.03 20.5 109.29 18.7574343

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    63/68

    59

    Table 8.7:Public sector bank

    No Name NPA2010 EPS 2010

    Book

    value2010 ROE 2010

    1 Allahabad Bank 0.66 26.07 131.73 19.79048053

    2 Andhra Bank 0.17 20.73 90.93 22.79775652

    3 Bank of Baroda 0.34 81.18 413.27 19.64333245

    4 Bank of India 1.31 33.88 243.41 13.91890226

    5 Bank of Maha 1.64 9.87 55.84 17.67550143

    6 Canara Bank 1.06 71.99 305.83 23.53922114

    7 Central Bank 0.69 24.27 107.96 22.48054835

    8 Corporation Bank 0.31 78.78 402.6 19.56780924

    9 Dena Bank 1.21 17.49 83.43 20.9636821310 E X I M Bank 0.2 3.02 24.54 12.30643847

    11 I O B 2.52 12.38 116.54 10.62296207

    12 IDBI Bank 1.02 13.79 113.48 12.15192104

    13 Indian Bank 0.23 34 152.66 22.27171492

    14 N A B A R D 0.02 7.79 181.25 4.297931034

    15 Oriental Bank 0.87 43.74 292.19 14.96971149

    16 Pun. & Sind Bank 0.36 26.98 105.4 25.59772296

    17 Punjab Natl.Bank 0.53 126.17 514.78 24.5094992

    18 S B T 0.91 134.13 568.12 23.60944871

    19 St Bk of Bikaner 0.78 88.58 483.48 18.3213369720 St Bk of Hyderab 0.55 3,883.28 20551.81 18.89507542

    21 St Bk of India 1.72 140.65 1038.77 13.54005218

    22 St Bk of Mysore 1.02 122.16 575.94 21.21054276

    23 St Bk of Patiala 1.04 183.78 1271.28 14.45629602

    24 Syndicate Bank 1.07 15.08 100.06 15.07095743

    25 UCO Bank 1.17 18.03 65.74 27.42622452

    26 Union Bank (I) 0.81 40.14 174.37 23.02001491

    27 United Bank (I) 1.84 9.29 91.69 10.13196641

    28 Vijaya Bank 1.4 10.47 61.44 17.04101563

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    64/68

    60

    Table 8.8 Private sector bank

    No Name 2010 EPS 2010

    Book

    value2010 ROE 2010

    29 AB Bank 7.68 1.28 14.49 8.83367839930 Abu Dhabi Comm. 0.19 1.2 20.69 5.799903335

    31 Akola Janat. Com 4.85 5.43 567.12 0.957469319

    32 Amer. Exp. Bank 0 0 5.95 0

    33 Antwerp Diamond 14.32 0 13.91 0

    34 Axis Bank 0.4 60.06 395.99 15.16704967

    35 Bank of Bah &Kuw 1.95 0.41 17.16 2.389277389

    36 Barclays Bank 5.15 0 9.5 0

    37 BNP Paribas 0 1.69 16.32 10.35539216

    38 Catholic Bank 1.58 0.87 184.72 0.47098311

    39 Citibank N. A. 2.14 2.3 35.19 6.53594771240 City Union Bank 0.58 3.7 20.66 17.9090029

    41 Cosmos Cp Bank 1.78 60.24 1383.69 4.353576307

    42 Credit Agricole 6.18 0.7 12.7 5.511811024

    43 DBS Bank 1 2.84 17.55 16.18233618

    44 DCB Bank 3.11 0 27.02 0

    45 Deutsche Bank 0.79 1.23 13.62 9.030837004

    46 Dhanlaxmi Bank 0.84 3.55 68.63 5.172665015

    47 Federal Bank 0.48 26.33 273.9 9.612997444

    48 Greater Bombay 1.69 11.8 135.53 8.706559433

    49 HDFC Bank 0.31 62.43 470.13 13.2793057250 Hongkong & Shang 2.31 1.8 25.5 7.058823529

    51 ICICI Bank 2.12 34.63 462.99 7.479643189

    52 IndusInd Bank 0.5 8.23 52.68 15.62262718

    53 ING Vysya Bank 1.2 19.76 185.04 10.67877216

    54 J & K Bank 0.28 101.93 620.84 16.41807873

    55 J P Morgan Chase 2.88 0.06 15 0.4

    56 Kapol Co-op Bank 0 2.07 50.92 4.065200314

    57 Karnataka Bank 1.31 11.79 136.78 8.61968124

    58 Karur Vysya Bank 0.23 59.69 257.57 23.17428272

    59 Kokan Merchanti 0 9.08 168.08 5.40218943460 Kotak Mah. Bank 1.73 16.18 128.83 12.55918652

    61 Lak. Vilas Bank 4.11 3.05 75.79 4.024277609

    62 Mahanagar Co-op 4.53 2.08 101.87 2.041818003

    63 Maratha Sahakari 8.91 4.91 336.72 1.458184842

    64 Mogaveera Co-op 0 0.38 1264.72 0.030046176

    65 Mumbai Dist.Bank 0 261.68 11132.2 2.35065845

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    65/68

    61

    66 Oversea-Ch. Bank 0 0 10.12 0

    67 Pun. & Mah. Bank 0 17.59 148.85 11.8172657

    68 Ratnakar Bank 0.97 1.73 33.59 5.150342364

    69 Royal Bank 1.95 0 134.95 0

    70 Sh.Arihant Co-op 0.24 11.06 154.09 7.177623467

    71 Shamrao Vithal 0 14.91 161.85 9.21223355

    72 South Ind.Bank 2.39 20.02 129.78 15.42610572

    73 South Ind.Co-op 0 5.7 79.21 7.196061103

    74 St Bk of Mauriti 4.32 0.95 16.46 5.771567436

    75 Stand.Chart.Bank 1.4 34.47 153.5 22.45602606

    76 Stand.Chart.PLC 1.4 34.47 153.5 22.45602606

    77 T N Merc. Bank 0.24 6,463.57 41006.07 15.76247126

    78 Yes Bank 0.06 23.81 90.96 26.17634125

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    66/68

    62

    Table 8.9 :Public sector bank

    No NameNPA2009

    EPS2009

    Book

    value2009 ROE 2009

    1 Allahabad Bank 0.72 16.78 111.45 15.056079

    2 Andhra Bank 0.18 12.7 75.2 16.8882979

    3 Bank of Baroda 0.31 59.44 352.36 16.8691111

    4 Bank of India 0.44 57.16 224.08 25.5087469

    5 Bank of Maha 0.79 8.46 47.97 17.6360225

    6 Canara Bank 1.09 49.19 244.87 20.0882101

    7 Central Bank 1.24 11.83 86.26 13.714352

    8 Corporation Bank 0.29 60.12 341.36 17.6119053

    9 Dena Bank 1.09 14.53 67.95 21.3833701

    10 E X I M Bank 0.23 3.41 28.46 11.9817287

    11 I O B 1.33 23.57 109.06 21.6119567

    12 IDBI Bank 0.92 11.42 102.69 11.1208492

    13 Indian Bank 0.18 27.11 127.52 21.2594103

    14 N A B A R D 0.03 6.95 172.37 4.03202413

    15 Oriental Bank 0.65 34.3 257.54 13.3183195

    16 Pun. & Sind Bank 0.32 23.56 77.41 30.4353443

    17 Punjab Natl.Bank 0.17 94.63 416.74 22.707203518 S B T 0.58 119.36 449.98 26.5256234

    19 St Bk of Bikaner 0.85 78.65 409.29 19.2162037

    20 St Bk of Hyderab 0.38 3,488.35 18599.01 18.7555682

    21 St Bk of India 1.79 139.76 912.73 15.3123048

    22 St Bk of Mysore 0.5 91.89 464.2 19.7953468

    23 St Bk of Patiala 0.6 187.83 1140.56 16.4682261

    24 Syndicate Bank 0.77 17.08 88.03 19.4024764

    25 UCO Bank 1.18 9.97 50.88 19.5951258

    26 Union Bank (I) 0.34 33.33 139.66 23.865101

    27 United Bank (I) 1.48 1.21 15.39 7.8622482128 Vijaya Bank 0.82 5.88 53.47 10.9968206

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    67/68

    63

    Table 8.10:Privet sector bank

    No Name 2009 EPS2009

    Book

    value2009 ROE 2009

    29 AB Bank 6.67 1.03 13.22 7.79122542

    30 Abu Dhabi Comm. 0 2.59 19.49 13.2888661

    31 Akola Janat. Com 0 45.64 577.48 7.90330401

    32 Amer. Exp. Bank 0.77 3.5 30.02 11.6588941

    33 Antwerp Diamond 0 0.58 11.01 5.26793824

    34 Axis Bank 0.4 48.85 284.53 17.1686641

    35 Bank of Bah &Kuw 1.51 3.29 12.32 26.7045455

    36 Barclays Bank 4.59 0.06 10.62 0.56497175

    37 BNP Paribas 0.86 1.59 14.03 11.332858238 Catholic Bank 2.39 19.7 184.05 10.7036131

    39 Citibank N. A. 2.63 8.35 42.95 19.4412107

    40 City Union Bank 1.08 3.69 20.65 17.8692494

    41 Cosmos Cp Bank 2.08 104.11 1270.23 8.19615345

    42 Credit Agricole 0 2.22 13 17.0769231

    43 DBS Bank 0.55 2.72 14.71 18.4908226

    44 DCB Bank 3.88 0 30.89 0

    45 Deutsche Bank 0.88 1.18 13.11 9.00076278

    46 Dhanlaxmi Bank 0.88 8.79 66.2 13.2779456

    47 Federal Bank 0.2 28.41 252.57 11.248366848 Greater Bombay 2.01 13.51 164.43 8.21626224

    49 HDFC Bank 0.63 51.08 344.31 14.835468

    50 Hongkong & Shang 1.42 2.87 23.7 12.1097046

    51 ICICI Bank 2.09 32.4 444.92 7.28220804

    52 IndusInd Bank 1.14 3.96 40.23 9.84340045

    53 ING Vysya Bank 1.2 18.06 154.94 11.656125

    54 J & K Bank 1.38 81.65 540.99 15.0927004

    55 J P Morgan Chase 1.27 2.9 16.41 17.6721511

    56 Kapol Co-op Bank 0 2.7 58.98 4.57782299

    57 Karnataka Bank 0.98 20.92 128.89 16.230894658 Karur Vysya Bank 0.25 41.68 250.26 16.6546791

    59 Kokan Merchanti 0.78 6.81 160.16 4.251998

    60 Kotak Mah. Bank 2.39 7.93 110.33 7.18752832

    61 Lak. Vilas Bank 1.24 9.89 93.01 10.6332652

    62 Mahanagar Co-op 4.38 4.79 111.45 4.29789143

    63 Maratha Sahakari 13.03 4.49 312.64 1.4361566

  • 7/25/2019 Impact of Non Performing Assets on Profitability for Public and Private Sector Banks

    68/68

    64 Mogaveera Co-op 13.25 0 1276.81 0

    65 Mumbai Dist.Bank 6.85 73.26 11741.39 0.62394657

    66 Oversea-Ch. Bank 0 0.63 10.16 6.2007874

    67 Pun. & Mah. Bank 1.33 21.08 160.04 13.1717071

    68 Ratnakar Bank 0.68 2.74 32.59 8.40748696

    69 Royal Bank 2.2 1.15 141.15 0.8147361

    70 Sh.Arihant Co-op 1.9 8.46 161 5.25465839

    71 Shamrao Vithal 2.21 11.51 172.3 6.68020894

    72 South Ind.Bank 1.13 16.72 113.76 14.697609

    73 South Ind.Co-op 0 4.92 74.77 6.58017922

    74 St Bk of Mauriti 0 0.66 15.15 4.35643564

    75 Stand.Chart.Bank 1.37 28.22 133.82 21.0880287

    76 Stand.Chart.PLC 1.37 28.22 133.82 21.0880287

    77 T N Merc. Bank 0.34 5,261.07 35304.29 14.90207

    78 Yes Bank 0.36 10.23 54.69 18.7054306