Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

20
9-12 April 2006 EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls TX Impact of Doppler Radar Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing Analysis of a Developing MCS MCS Mike Coniglio David Dowell Mike Coniglio David Dowell Lou Wicker Dave Stensrud Lou Wicker Dave Stensrud National Severe Storms Laboratory National Severe Storms Laboratory

description

Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS. Mike Coniglio David Dowell Lou Wicker Dave Stensrud National Severe Storms Laboratory. Motivation. Limited real-data EnKF experiments Does EnKF work with a messy convective event? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

Page 1: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls TX

Impact of Doppler Radar Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Observations on the EnKF

Analysis of a Developing MCSAnalysis of a Developing MCS

Mike Coniglio David Dowell Mike Coniglio David Dowell

Lou Wicker Dave StensrudLou Wicker Dave Stensrud

National Severe Storms LaboratoryNational Severe Storms Laboratory

Page 2: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

MotivationMotivation• Limited real-data EnKF experimentsLimited real-data EnKF experiments

• Does EnKF work with a messy convective event?Does EnKF work with a messy convective event?• Obstacles to getting robust storm-scale analyses Obstacles to getting robust storm-scale analyses

using WSR-88D data?using WSR-88D data?• Refl-only vs. refl&vel assimilation?Refl-only vs. refl&vel assimilation?

• Build catalog of cases from diff convective Build catalog of cases from diff convective modes to prove storm-scale EnKF conceptmodes to prove storm-scale EnKF concept• Start with the Start with the 11-12 June 2003 MCS11-12 June 2003 MCS

Page 3: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

11-12 June 2003 MCS11-12 June 2003 MCS2129z 2144z 2159z 2214z 2229z 2243z

2258z 2313z 2328z 2343z 2357z 0013z

0142z0127z0112z0058z0043z0028z

0207z 0221z 0236z 0251z 0306z 0321z

Page 4: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

11-12 June 2003 MCS11-12 June 2003 MCS

Page 5: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Configuration of ExperimentsConfiguration of Experiments

• NCOMMASNCOMMAS• nnee=20-50 members=20-50 members• ~ 400 km by 400 km domain~ 400 km by 400 km domain x,yx,y=2-3 km in model and obs analysis=2-3 km in model and obs analysis

• Data assimilated every 1-5 min for various Data assimilated every 1-5 min for various 45-90 min periods45-90 min periods

• Modified & perturbed OUN soundingModified & perturbed OUN sounding• LFO ice with various slope/intercept LFO ice with various slope/intercept

parametersparameters• Only reflectivity assimilated initiallyOnly reflectivity assimilated initially

Page 6: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Sense from Initial ExperimentsSense from Initial Experiments• Solutions very sensitive to initial soundingSolutions very sensitive to initial sounding

• Too little CIN – noise & spurious stormsToo little CIN – noise & spurious storms• Need to set missing dBZs to a low value (0)Need to set missing dBZs to a low value (0)• Too much CIN – storms die after assimilationToo much CIN – storms die after assimilation

• Storms/cold pool structures during assim. Storms/cold pool structures during assim. too small & too weak, not persistenttoo small & too weak, not persistent• Perhaps REFL-only assimilation not Perhaps REFL-only assimilation not

feasible?feasible?• Try using reflectivity & radial velocityTry using reflectivity & radial velocity

• Too much convection in ground clutterToo much convection in ground clutter• Automated velocity unfolding and ground Automated velocity unfolding and ground

clutter removal implementedclutter removal implemented

Page 7: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Runs after 3-4 months testingRuns after 3-4 months testing• Runs are stable with good representation Runs are stable with good representation

of two main clustersof two main clusters

• but getting too much convection in but getting too much convection in between main stormsbetween main storms

Obs AnalysisObs Analysis EnKF AnalysisEnKF Analysis

Page 8: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Runs after 3-4 months testingRuns after 3-4 months testing• Too much ground clutter getting through?Too much ground clutter getting through?• No! Anomalous cold pool is an issue:No! Anomalous cold pool is an issue:

Page 9: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Dowell 8 May 2003 experimentDowell 8 May 2003 experiment

• What if TH isn’t updated with a velocity What if TH isn’t updated with a velocity ob?ob?

Page 10: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

No update of TH with VelNo update of TH with Vel• Anomalous cold pool gone:Anomalous cold pool gone:

• BUT……..BUT……..

Page 11: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

PROBLEMPROBLEM• Noticed storm/cold pool growth slowNoticed storm/cold pool growth slow

• Increase in initial sounding variability and Increase in initial sounding variability and bubbles didn’t help muchbubbles didn’t help much

• dBZ and QR too low in low levels!dBZ and QR too low in low levels!

Page 12: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

PROBLEMPROBLEM• dBZ and QR too low in low levelsdBZ and QR too low in low levels

Page 13: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Lack of Low-Level ReflectivityLack of Low-Level Reflectivity

• Could explain why updraft/cold pool Could explain why updraft/cold pool structures too transientstructures too transient

• Microphysics or obs problem?Microphysics or obs problem?• What if reflectivity is withheld in precipitating What if reflectivity is withheld in precipitating

areas?areas?• Don’t assimilate reflectivity < 15 dBZDon’t assimilate reflectivity < 15 dBZ

• LFO large hail setting not appropriate? -Change LFO large hail setting not appropriate? -Change to graupel/hail mixtureto graupel/hail mixture

• Change raindrop size distributionChange raindrop size distribution• Are there more problems with using velocity?Are there more problems with using velocity?

• Don’t assimilate radial velocity at allDon’t assimilate radial velocity at all

Page 14: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

no assimilation of reflectivity > 15 dBZ, no assimilation of reflectivity > 15 dBZ, more graupelmore graupel

• Reflectivity important for maintaining storms!Reflectivity important for maintaining storms!

Page 15: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Fewer but larger raindropsFewer but larger raindrops

Page 16: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Fewer but larger raindropsFewer but larger raindrops

Page 17: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Fewer but larger raindropsFewer but larger raindrops

Page 18: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

No assimilation of velocityNo assimilation of velocity

Page 19: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

No assimilation of velocityNo assimilation of velocity

Page 20: Impact of Doppler Radar Observations on the EnKF Analysis of a Developing MCS

9-12 April 2006EnDA Workshop, Marble Falls, TX

Where to go from hereWhere to go from here

• Nail down anomalous bubble problemNail down anomalous bubble problem• Explore microphysics impactsExplore microphysics impacts• Thorough comparison of refl only vs refl & Thorough comparison of refl only vs refl &

vel experimentsvel experiments• New ways to initialize ensemble/maintain New ways to initialize ensemble/maintain

spreadspread• Try new cases from “scratch”Try new cases from “scratch”