Immunotherapy for hepatoma using a dual-function vector ... · 4/10/2014 · NK, CD4+T, CD8+T...
Transcript of Immunotherapy for hepatoma using a dual-function vector ... · 4/10/2014 · NK, CD4+T, CD8+T...
1
Immunotherapy for hepatoma using a dual-function vector with both
immunostimulatory and Pim-3-silencing effects
Qie Guo1,3, Peixiang Lan1, Xin Yu1, Qiuju Han1, Jian Zhang1, Zhigang Tian1,2, Cai Zhang1
1Institute of Immunopharmacology & Immunotherapy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong
University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and
Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China
3Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao
266000, Shandong, China
Corresponding author: Cai Zhang, Institute of Immunopharmacology & Immunotherapy, School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan 250012, China. Tel &
Fax: 86-531-8838-3782; E-mail: [email protected]
Running title: Immunotherapy for hepatoma using a dual-function vector
Key words: immunotherapy; hepatoma; Pim-3; TLR7; dual-function vector
Financial support: C. Zhang was supported by grants from the National 973 Basic Research Program
of China (#2013CB944901), the Natural Science Foundation of China (#81273220, # 31200651), and
the Young and Middle-aged Scientist Award of Shandong Province (# BS2010YY033).
The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest
Word count: 4981
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
2
6 figures (Fig. 1-Fig. 6); 2 supplementary Tables (Table S1-S2) and 4 supplementary figures (Fig.
S1-S4)
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
3
Abstract
Tumorigenesis is an immortalization process where the growth of normal cells uncontrolled
and programmed cell death is suppressed. Molecular biological and immunological studies have
revealed that the aberrant expression of some pro-oncogene boosts proliferation and inhibits apoptosis,
which is vital for the tumor development. The hypofunction of the host immune system also drives the
development and metastasis of malignant tumors. Pim-3, a member of the Pim family, is aberrantly
expressed in several cancers. Data suggest that Pim-3 inhibits apoptosis by phosphorylating the
proapoptotic BH3-only protein, Bad. Here, we constructed a dual-function small hairpin RNA
(shRNA) vector containing an shRNA targeting Pim-3 and a TLR7-stimulating ssRNA. Stimulation
with this bi-functional vector in vitro promoted significant apoptosis of Hepa1-6 cells by regulating
the expression of apoptosis-related proteins and induced secretion of type I IFNs. Most importantly,
this bi-functional vector more effectively inhibited subcutaneous Hepa1-6 cell growth than did single
shRNA and ssRNA treatment in vivo. NK, CD4+T, CD8+T cells and macrophages were required for
effective tumor suppression, and CD4+T cells were shown to play a helper role in the activation of NK
cells, possibly by regulating the secretion of Th1 or Th2 cytokines. This ssRNA-shRNA bi-functional
vector may represent a promising approach for tumor therapy.
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
4
Introduction
Accumulated genetic and epigenetic changes that alter the proliferation and survival pathways
of normal cells have resulted in cellular transformation and progressive tumor growth (1). Evasion of
apoptosis and self-sufficiency in growth signals are essential for malignant growth. The
proto-oncogene family Provirus integrating site Moloney murine leukemia virus (Pim) is a highly
conserved serine/threonine kinase family that has been implicated in cancer progression (2,3). Three
Pim kinases (Pim-1, -2 and -3) have been identified. Pim-1 and Pim-2 induce cell cycle progression in
cooperation with c-Myc, acting as inhibitors of apoptosis in hematological malignancies and some
solid tumors (2,3). The newest member of the family, Pim-3, is aberrantly expressed in several
cancers, particularly those of endoderm-derived organs, including liver, pancreas, colon and stomach
(4-7). Data suggest that Pim-3 inhibits apoptosis by phosphorylating and inactivating the proapoptotic
BH3-only protein Bad (4-6). Pim-3 mRNA and protein were detected in human hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC) tissues and cell lines, but not in normal hepatocytes and liver tissues. Silencing of
Pim-3 by RNA interference inhibited growth and enhanced apoptosis in hepatoma cells (7). Thus,
Pim-3 kinase may be a candidate molecular target for cancer therapy.
Tumor pathogenesis also involves a process called cancer immunoediting, a temporal transition
from immune-mediated tumor elimination in early phases of tumor development to immune escape of
established tumors (8). The ability to evade immune recognition and to suppress immune reactivity are
the main methods whereby cancers evade immune destruction (9,10). Host immunosuppression,
mediated by tumor cells, is characterized by incompetence of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs),
massive secretion of suppressing cytokines (such as IL-10 and TGF-β) and activation of Treg cells,
leading to functional deficiencies in CTLs, CD4+ Th1 cells or natural killer (NK) cells (9-11). Thus,
tumor therapy must restimulate the immune response, in addition to suppressing oncogene expression.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognition receptors that trigger the innate immune
response and prime the antigen-specific adaptive immune response by recognizing conserved
structures in pathogens. TLRs are important in protective immunity against cancer and infection (12).
TLRs are expressed by immune and non-immune cells, and their ligands represent promising immune
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
5
stimulators that could stimulate both innate and adaptive immune cells (12). Interferons (IFNs)
secretion following TLR-mediated activation of IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs) is regarded as the
central coordinator of immune revival (13). TLR7 or TLR8, expressed in endosomes, recognizes
natural nucleoside structures, such as viral single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) and synthetic compounds,
e.g. imidazoquinolines (14,15). U- or GU-rich ssRNAs, such as ssRNA40 derived from HIV-1, are
potent TLR7 activators (12,14,16). Binding of TLR7 with its agonists triggers a signaling cascade,
which comprises recruitment of MyD88, activation of the NF-κB and IRF7 pathway, and production
of type I IFN and inflammatory cytokines. TLR7 stimulation can prime activation of NK and T cells
directly or with the help of activated antigen presenting cells (APCs) and exhibit anti-tumor immune
responses (16,17).
Here, we constructed a dual-function small hairpin RNA (shRNA) vector containing an shRNA
targeting Pim-3 and a TLR7-stimulating ssRNA. Stimulation with this bi-functional vector in vitro
promoted significant apoptosis of Hepa1-6 cells and induced secretion of type I IFNs. Importantly, the
vector more effectively inhibited subcutaneous Hepa1-6 cell growth than did single shRNA and
ssRNA treatment in vivo. NK, CD4+, CD8+ T cells and macrophages were required for effective tumor
suppression. CD4+T cells were shown play a helper role in activating NK cells. The bi-functional
vector may represent a promising approach for tumor therapy.
Materials and Methods
Plasmid construction and lentiviral packaging
Transcription of each shRNA oligonucleotide targeting Pim-3 (sense-loop-antisense) was designed as
a synthetic duplex with overhanging ends identical to those created by restriction enzyme digestion
(BamH I at the 5' and EcoR I at the 3'), and was cloned into vector pTZU6+1 vector which contains a
U6 polymerase-III (pol-III) promoter. The shRNA template sequences are shown in Table S1.
Transcription of each ssRNA oligonucleotide synthetic duplex sequence (sense-terminator) was
designed using a similar overhanging ends procedure to the shRNA, and cloned into expression vector
pSIREN, which contains a U6 pol-III promoter. ssRNA template sequences are shown in Table S1. To
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
6
create the dual functional vector, the U6+shRNA in pTZU6+1-shRNA was digested by Hind III and
EcoR I, and inserted to pSIREN-ssRNA.
pSIREN-control, ssRNA, shRNA, or dual vectors were cloned into a lentiviral pGCSIL-GFP
plasmid, and transfected into 293T cells. 48 h later, culture supernatant was collected and filtered
through a 0.45 μm filter. Viruses (LV-ctrl, LV-ssRNA, LV-shRNA, LV-dual) were harvested by
centrifugation at 70,000 × g at 4°C for 2 h. Harvested viruses were aliquoted and stored at -80°C.
Cell culture
Mouse hepatoma cell lines Hepa1-6 and H22 (Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shanghai, China) and normal mouse hepatocyte cell line BNL.CL2 (American type culture collection,
ATCC) were maintained in DMEM medium (GIBCO/BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented
with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. These cell lines were used within 6 months of receipt.
Cells were never used above 10 passages and were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with
5% CO2.
Animals, tumor challenge and treatment
C57BL/6 mice (6-8 weeks old; Experimental Animal Center of Beijing University, Beijing,
China) were maintained under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions. The Committee on the Ethics
of Animal Experiments of the Shandong University approved all the animal studies.
1 × 106 Hepa1-6 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of C57BL/6 mice. After 2
weeks, LV-ctrl, LV-ssRNA, LV-shRNA, LV-dual (MOI = 50) were administered intra-tumorally once a
week for two weeks. After another two weeks, the mice were sacrificed and the tumor volume was
calculated by length × width2/2.
Human samples
HCC and non-tumor liver tissue samples were obtained from the Shandong Provincial Hospital (Jinan,
China) under the National Regulation of Clinical Sampling in China. Both were immediately fresh
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
7
frozen and stored at -80° for further use in Real-Time PCR and western blotting assays.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted by the TRIzol Regent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and cDNAs
were synthesized using Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen), followed by Real-Time
PCR and semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis. For semi-quantitative RT-PCR, cDNA was amplified
using pairs of primers (RiboBio, GuangZhou, China) that specifically amplify Pim-3 or other genes,
according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For Real-Time PCR analysis, cDNA was amplified with the
assistance of SYBR green (Bio-Rad, USA). Relative gene expression was determined in comparison
with that of GAPDH or β-actin. PCR primers are provided in Table S2.
Western blotting
Cells were collected and lysed on ice using a Total Protein Extraction Reagent (Beyotime,
Jiangsu, China). The protein samples (30 μg/lane) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane
(Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline with 5% (w/v)
non-fat dry milk, and then incubated with primary antibodies over night at 4°C, followed by
incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 50 min at room
temperature. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS
System BioradChemiDoc XRS (Bio-Rad). Rabbit anti-human pim-3, anti-mouse pim-3, anti-mouse
Bad, anti-mouse p-Bad, anti-mouse NF-κB, and anti-mouse p-NFκB mAbs were purchased from Cell
Signaling Technology (New England BioLabs Inc., USA). Rabbit anti-mouse p-PKR, anti-mouse
IκB-α, anti-mouse bcl-2, anti-mouse bcl-XL, anti-mouse Bim, and anti-mouse TLR7 mAbs were
obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
NK cytotoxicity assays
The ability of spleen lymphocytes to kill Hepa1-6 cells was evaluated by CFSE/7-AAD flow
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
8
cytometry assay, as previously described (18). Briefly, Hepa1-6 cells were incubated with 1 ml of
CFSE (2 mM) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 10 min at 37 °C and then washed. Spleen
lymphocytes were isolated and added to the target cells at effector/target ratios of 50:1, 25:1 and 12.5:1,
respectively, for 4 h. Following a further wash, cells were labeled for 15 min with 7-AAD (optimized at
0.25 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) to identify dead cells. The cells were then analyzed via flow cytometer
(FACScalibur, USA). Cytotoxicity was calculated as follows: % lysis = (CFSE/7-AAD double positive
cells /CFSE positive cells) × 100%.
Measurement of apoptosis
Staining for AnnexinV-FITC/PI (BestBio, Shanghai, China) via flow cytometry was used to
detect apoptosis of tumor cells . The percentage of cells that were Annexin V-positive represented the
proportion of apoptotic cells. Alternatively, apoptosis was also measured by TUNEL staining using a
One Step TUNEL Apoptosis Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). Nuclear staining was evaluated under a
light microscope via DAPI staining (Beyotime). A commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) kit (KeyingMei, Beijing, China) detected the level of caspase-8 in cell lysates, according to
the manufacturer’s instruction.
ELISA for cytokine detection
The levels of cytokines (IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, and IL-10) in culture supernatants
from Hepa1-6 cells and in the serum of tumor-bearing mice were detected by ELISA kits
(ExCellBiology, Shanghai, China).
Flow Cytometry analysis
Splenic lymphocytes were isolated to analyze the percentages and activation of NK cells and T
cells after the treatment with shRNA, ssRNA and dual vectors. The expression of NKG2D, NKG2A,
and PD-1 on lymphocytes and NKG2D ligands on Hepa1-6 cells was also detected. Cells were
harvested, blocked with anti-FcγR mAb, and stained with labeled mAbs at 4°C for 45 min. For
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
9
intracellular IFN-γ staining, splenic cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, and
treated with monensin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 4 h to inhibit extracellular secretion of
cytokines. The antibodies used were: FITC-conjugated NK1.1, PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated CD3e (BD
Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA); FITC-conjugated CD4, PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated CD8,
PE-conjugated CD69, APC-conjugated NKG2D and PE-conjugated NKG2A (eBiosciences, San
Diego, CA); and Carboxyfluorescein-conjugated RAE-1, FITC-conjugated MULT-1, PE-conjugated
H-60 and PE-conjugated IFN-γ mAb (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). All stained cells were
analyzed using a flow cytometer, and the data were processed with WinMDI 2.9 software (Scripps
Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Lymphocyte depletion and TLR7 inhibition
Cell depletion mAbs were purified from PK136 (α-NK1.1), GK1.5 (α-CD4) and 2.43 (α-CD8α)
hybridoma cell lines. To deplete cells, tumor-bearing mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1 mg
of mAb for 3 days (19). To deplete macrophages, 1 mg liposomes containing DMDP
(dichloromethylene diphosphonate, Sigma) was administered i.p. into C57BL/6 48 h before treatment
(20). The LV-dual vector (MOI = 50) was then administered intra-tumorally once a week for two
weeks. To ablate the function of TLR7, IRS661 (5'-TGCTTGCAAGCTTGCAAGCA-3') (TAKARA,
Otsu, Shiga, Japan), a decoy analog that interferes with the combination of TLR7 and ssRNA (21,22),
was administered i.v. before LV-dual vector treatment.
Histochemical analysis
Tumor tissues were excised and fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin; embedded in paraffin;
sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to assess morphological changes and lymphocyte
infiltration.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis was performed using a paired Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test. P
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
10
values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Pim-3 is aberrantly expressed in mouse hepatoma cell lines and human hepatocellular
carcinoma tissues. Firstly, we detected the expression of Pim-3 in mouse hepatoma cell lines Hepa1-6
and H22, and in the normal hepatocyte cell line BNL.CL2. Pim-3 was highly expressed in Hepa1-6
and H22 cell lines, but was weakly expressed in normal hepatocytes (Fig. S1A). Western blotting also
showed that Pim-3 expression was higher in hepatoma Hapa1-6 and H22 cell lines, and low in
BNL.CL2 cells (Fig. 1B). Pim-3 expression in human primary hepatocellular carcinoma cells was
significantly higher in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues at both the mRNA and protein levels
(Fig. S1C and S1D). These results suggested a critical role of Pim-3 in tumorigenesis and
pathogenesis of liver cancer.
Construction of a dual function vector with both immunostimulatory ssRNA and
Pim-3-silencing shRNA. To clarify the role of Pim-3 in cell growth and apoptosis of hepatomas and
to stimulate an immune response and silence Pim-3 expression simultaneously, we constructed a dual
function vector containing an immunostimulatory ssRNA and a Pim-3-gene–silencing shRNA (Fig.
1A). We designed four siRNA duplexes to target the open reading frame encoding of Pim-3 mRNA by
employing BLOCK-iTTM RNAi Designer. The annealed siRNA oligonucleotides were knocked into
the expressing vector pTZU6+1 to construct short-hairpin RNAs (shRNAs). Four different ssRNA
oligonucleotides were designed and inserted into pSIREN plasmid (ssRNAs). The shRNA and ssRNA
vectors were transfected into Hepa1-6 cells separately to test the Pim-3 silencing and
immunostimulatory effect. The shRNA oligonucleotide with most effective silencing effect was
selected and inserted into the pSIREN plasmid containing the most potent ssRNA oligonucleotide to
form a bi-functional vector (Fig. 1A).
We then confirmed the ability of the bi-functional vector to downregulate Pim-3 expression. Fig.
2B shows that Pim-3 mRNA and protein levels were downregulated after transfection with both
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
11
shRNA and the bi-functional vector compared with the pSIREN or ssRNA transfection group (Fig.
1B). The ssRNA is regarded as a ligand of TLR7, and ssRNA stimulation can activate TLR7 signal
pathway, leading to the production of type I IFN and inflammatory factors (14-17); therefore, we
detected whether the bi-functional vector could stimulate the TLR7 pathway by measuring the
production of IFN-α and IFN-β. The mRNA of IFN-α and IFN-β in Hepa1-6 cells was induced and
the concentration of IFN-α and IFN-β in the supernatants increased after transfection with the ssRNA
and bi-functional vector (Fig. 1C and 1D). Collectively, these results indicted a successfully
constructed dual function ssRNA-shRNA vector with both Pim-3 silencing and innate immune
stimulation effects.
The dual function vector transfection induces the apoptosis of murine hepatoma Hepa1-6 cells.
Pim-3 is reported to inhibit the apoptosis of tumor cells by phosphorylating and inactivating
pro-apoptotic protein Bad (4,7). Silencing of Pim-3 significantly promoted apoptosis of Hepa1-6 cells,
as detected by Annexin V/PI double staining (Fig. 2A). As depicted in Fig. 2B, the apoptotic cells
were induced markedly after transfection with both shRNA and dually function vector as shown by in
vitro TUNEL staining. Nuclear DAP I-staining also showed obvious shrinking of nuclei and
nucleosomes after transfection with the shRNA or bi-functional vector (Fig. 2B, lower). Importantly,
the dual function vector showed a more significant pro-apoptotic effect than the shRNA vector.
We also observed that the shRNA and bi-functional vector significantly downregulated the
mRNA and protein levels of anti-apoptotic genes Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 ( Fig. S2A). The expression of
Bim, another member of Bcl-2 family, did not change. Bad plays a crucial role in promoting cell
apoptosis, probably by causing the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria and the disintegration
of membranes (4,23). Phosphorylated Bad (p-Bad) represents an inactive form of Bad, which is
induced by proto-oncogenes and exploited by tumor cells to avoid apoptosis (4,24). Silencing of
Pim-3 by the shRNA and bi-functional vector markedly suppressed the phosphorylation of Bad, but
did not alter the protein abundance of total Bad (Fig. S2B). These results suggested that ablation of
endogenous Pim-3 increased apoptosis by downregulating the expression of Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 and by
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
12
blocking the phosphorylation of Bad. In Hepa1-6 cells, the activity of caspase-8 (an apoptosis
activator) was enhanced by both shRNA and dual function transfection at 24 h and 36 h, suggesting
that the apoptotic-related pathway was activated (Fig. S2C). These results suggest that transfection
with the Pim-3 shRNA and dual function vector promotes apoptosis of hepatoma cells by silencing
Pim-3, suppressing the phosphorylation of Bad and downregulating Bcl-XL and Bcl-2, resulting in the
activation of the apoptosis-related signal pathway.
Treatment with bi-functional vector inhibits subcutaneous tumor growth of hepa1-6 in vivo. To
explore the anti-tumor effect of the dual function vector in vivo, C57BL/6 mice were administered
subcutaneously with 1 × 106 Hepa1-6 cells. After 2 weeks of tumor challenge, LV-ctrl, LV-ssRNA,
LV-shRNA, and LV-dual (MOI = 50) were administered separately via intra-tumoral injection once a
week for two weeks. Tumor volume was calculated at 4 weeks. Treatment with ssRNA, shRNA and
dual function LV-vector significantly suppressed tumor growth (Fig. 3A), with the dual vector
treatment displaying the most significant inhibition (Fig. 3B). Tumor weight showed a similar trend
(data not shown). These results indicated that silencing of Pim-3 and stimulation of the immune
response contribute to the antitumor activity of the bi-functional vector in vivo.
Both NK and T cells are required for suppressing the growth of hepa1-6 by the bi-functional
vector. The more efficient tumor inhibition of the bi-functional vector suggested that the
immunostimulatory effect exerted by the ssRNA plays important role in suppressing tumor growth. To
explore the mechanism of suppression of tumor growth, particularly the mechanism of immune
stimulation, we observed the activation of immune responses induced by the bi-functional vector in
C57BL/6 mice. The proportion and activation (CD69+) of splenic NK and CD4+ T cells, but not
CD8+T cells, increased significantly in both LV-ssRNA- and LV-dual-treated mice (Fig. 3C).
Meanwhile, lymphocyte infiltration was observed in tumor tissue of both LV-ssRNA and LV-dual
treatment groups, and tumor necrosis was found in LV-ssRNA, LV-shRNA and LV-dual treatment
groups (Fig. S3A). Tumor apoptosis was also significantly higher in LV-dual-treated mice (Fig. S3B),
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
13
and the serum levels of IFN-α and IFN-β were higher in LV-dual therapy group, than in the shRNA
and control groups (Fig. S3C).
To further investigate which immune cells are involved in the anti-tumor responses, we depleted
of NK, CD4+T, and CD8+T cells using depletion mAb, separately, by i.p. for 3 days after solid tumors
were established. LV-coated vectors were then administered to tumor-bearing mouse via intratumoral
injection. Depletion of NK, CD4+ and CD8+T cells significantly attenuated the dual function
vector-induced tumor inhibition (Fig. 3D). Depletion of NK and CD4+T cell exhibited a more obvious
effect. Thus, NK, CD4+T and CD8+T cells are all required for bi-functional vector-mediated growth
suppression of hepa1-6 cells. We also observed the role of APCs in tumor growth by depleting
macrophages using 1 mg of liposomes containing DMDP i.p. into tumor-bearing mouse before dual
functional vector treatment. Depletion of macrophages also significantly impaired dual function
vector-induced tumor suppression (Fig. 3D).
To explore the exact mechanism of NK cells in the inhibition of the growth of Hepa1-6 during
dual function vector administration, we isolated splenic NK cells from tumor-bearing mice treated
with indicated vectors and tested their ability to kill Hepa1-6 targets. The cytotoxicity of NK cells
from mice treated with both LV-ssRNA and LV-dual was higher than that from LV-ctrl-treated mice,
with highest cytolysis observed in the LV-dual group (Fig. 4A). We further examined the expression of
NK cell receptors NKG2D and NKG2A, the co-inhibitory receptor PD-1 and intracellular IFN-γ by
FACS. The expressions of activating receptor NKG2D and IFN-γ markedly increased, while the
inhibitory receptor NKG2A and PD-1 were suppressed in both ssRNA and dual-treated groups, with
larger changes in dually function vector treatment group (Fig. 4B). We detected the expression of
NKG2D ligands MULT-1, RAE-1 and H-60 on hepa1-6 cells via FACS. MULT-1 and H-60
expressions were upregulated after transfection with both ssRNA and bi-functional vectors in vitro
(Fig. 4C). However, RAE-1 was not detected on hepa1-6 cells (data not shown). To further determine
whether the enhanced cytolytic capacity of NK cells induced by ssRNA and dual vector was mediated
by NKG2D and its ligands, we blocked the interaction of NKG2D and its ligands with neutralizing
anti-NKG2D antibody before detecting NK cell lysis. NKG2D blockade significantly attenuated the
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
14
cytotoxicity of NK cells against Hepa1-6 cells (Fig. 4D). These results showed that treatment with
ssRNA and bi-functional vector induced NKG2D expression and IFN-γ production, while reducing the
expression of NKG2A and PD-1, which promoted NK cell activation. ssRNA and bi-functional vector
treatment also augmented the expression of NKG2D ligands, and the interaction of NKG2D and its
ligands contributed to the enhanced NK lysis.
CD4+ T cells are involved in the activation of NK cells.
CD4+T cell depletion also impaired tumor inhibition, suggesting that CD4+T cells play an important
role in the suppression of tumor growth mediated by bi-functional vector (Fig. 3C-D). ssRNA and
bi-functional vector administration downregulated the expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells, suggesting
the reverse of CD4+ T cell inhibition in tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 5A). The secretion of Th1 and Th2
cytokine in serum, represented by IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-4, IL-10 respectively, were examined. Both
ssRNA and dual vector administration promoted the production of Th1-type cytokine IFN-γ and
TNF-α, but reduced the secretion of Th2-type cytokine IL-4 and IL-10 (Fig. 5B). We hypothesized
that treatment with ssRNA and bi-functional vector promoted CD4+T cell proliferation and activation
(Fig. 3C), and shifted the balance of Th1 and Th2 cytokine secretion by CD4+ T cells towards Th1,
which contributed to the anti-tumor immune response.
CD4+T cells provide help for NK cell activation (25,26); therefore, we determined whether
depletion of CD4+T cells impaired the activation and function of NK cells. CD4+T cell elimination did
not influence the proportion of splenic NK cells; however, NK cell activation was inhibited
significantly in the bifunctional vector treatment group (Fig. 5C). Moreover, the cytotoxicity of
splenic NK cells was significantly reduced after CD4+T cells were depleted (Fig. 5D). Thus CD4+T
cells provide a necessary help for NK cell activation and play important role in the anti-tumor effect
exerted by the bi-functional vector.
Activation of the TLR7 signal pathway is important for the anti-tumor effect mediated by
the bi-functional vector. TLR7 and TLR8, also known as ‘nucleic acid-sensing TLRs’, were
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
15
originally identified as recognizing imidazoquinoline derivatives such as imiquimod, resiquimod
(R-848), and guanine analogs such as loxoribine (which have antiviral and antitumor properties) (17).
TLR7 also recognizes ssRNA derived from RNA viruses, such as vesicular stomatitis virus, influenza
A virus and human immunodeficiency virus (27). To further determine the mechanism whereby
ssRNA recognition leads to increased NK and CD4+ T cell activation during dual vector treatment, we
evaluated TLR7 and TLR8 expression in Hepa1-6 cells after dual vector transfection. The gene
expression of TLR7 and TLR8, but not TLR3, in Hepa1-6 cells was significantly induced after
transfection with ssRNA and dual function vectors (Fig. 6A). The protein level of TLR7 also increased
(Fig. 6B). Both vectors also promoted phosphorylation of NF-κB and degradation of IκB-α, indicating
the activation of the TLR7 signal pathway. Interestingly, the phosphorylation of another
pattern-recognition receptor, PKR, was also upregulated after transfection with ssRNA and
bi-functional vectors (Fig. 6B). To further confirm the role of TLR7 in the dual vector-induced
immunostimulatory effect and tumor inhibition, we suppressed the TLR7 signal pathway by
administering a TLR7 inhibitor, IRS661, a decoy analog that interferes with the combination of TLR7
and ssRNA (21), to tumor-bearing mice i.v. before LV-dual vector treatment. We found that IRS661
treatment nearly completely eliminated dual vector-induced tumor suppression (Fig. 6C). In addition,
IRS661 treatment significantly attenuated the expression of IFN-γ, perforin and CD69 in/on NK cells
(Fig. 6D), as well as the expression of IFN-γ, CD25 and CD69 in/on CD4+T cells (Fig. 6E),
suggesting the functional impairment of NK and CD4+T cells. Similarly, IRS661 treatment markedly
decreased the percentages of NK and CD4+T cells, as well as the activation of NK, CD4+T and CD8+T
cells in tumor-infiltrating sites (Fig. S4). These results revealed that activation of the TLR7 signal
pathway is essential for the anti-tumor effect of the bi-functional vector.
Discussion
Evidence indicates that tumor cells have evolved mechanisms to evade single-targeted treatments such
as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The proliferation and migration of tumors rely on their genetic and
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
16
epigenetic plasticity and the suppression of host immune responses. Genetic plasticity includes
aberrant expression of some proto-oncogenes that are associated with malignant growth and evading
apoptosis (1,9,10). Meanwhile, the immunosuppressive microenvironment induced by tumors further
contributes to their escape from immunosurveillance (28). Therefore, combined therapies that silence
oncogene expression and stimulate anti-tumor immune responses represent a novel therapeutic
strategy.
Pim kinases are important downstream effector molecules of some oncogenes, such as ABL,
JAK2 and Flt-3, and are closely related to tumorigenesis (29). Although belonging to the Pim kinase
family, the expression and regulatory mechanisms may be different for the three Pim members. Pim-1
protein is highly expressed in the liver and spleen during hematopoiesis and is overexpressed in
lymphoma and leukemia. Pim-2 is largely expressed in both solid and hematological tumors (29).
Pim-3 expression seems to be restricted to solid tumors, in particularly adenocarcinomas from the
liver, pancreas, colon and stomach [4-7]; however, it is not found in the normal colon, thymus, liver
and small intestine. Pim-3 is highly expressed in HCC tissues and cell lines, and is reported to
accelerate HCC development when induced by the hepatocarcinogen diethylnitrosamine (DEN) in
Pim-3 transgenic mice in which Pim-3 is selectively expressed in the liver (30). Thus, Pim-3
represents an attractive target for cancer therapy, particularly for HCC.
Pim-1 and Pim-2 can be upregulated by cytokines such as IL-12 and IFN-α via STAT proteins
activation, and are involved in T cell differentiation (31,32). However, for Pim-3, ETS-1 and Sp1 are
major regulators of its gene expression. Although the human Pim-3 gene contains putative binding
sites for STAT3, STAT3 showed little contribution to Pim-3 gene expression in human pancreatic
cancer cells (33,34). Accordingly, we did not see any changes in Pim-3 expression after ssRNA
transfection, although increased levels of type I IFN were produced (Fig. 1 and Fig. S2). We proposed
that the STAT protein does not regulate Pim-3 gene expression in hepatomas. There may be different
regulatory mechanisms for different Pim genes and in hematopoietic or solid tumor cells.
TLR7 recognizes specific viral ssRNA sequences, such as GUGUU, U-rich sequences, and a
GU-rich 4-mer (14,16,17). Activation of TLR7 signaling leads to production of type I IFN and
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
17
inflammatory cytokines, which further prime innate and adaptive immune responses (14,16). Systemic
application of TLR7 ligands not only functionally activates both CD8+ T cells and NK cells, but also
blocks the suppressive function of regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)
(35,36). However, TLR7 expression and TLR7 signaling are often suppressed in tumor patients,
suggesting impaired priming of host anti-tumor immune responses. For example, downregulation of
TLR7 expression and function was found in hepatocytes from HCC, particularly HBV- or
HCV-related HCC (37,38). Therefore, it is necessary to stimulate an anti-tumor immune response
through priming TLR7 signaling. Data has shown the potential therapeutic benefit in TLR7-based
cancer immunotherapy (39,40). Here, we constructed a dual function vector containing both a
Pim-3-targeting shRNA and a TLR7-based immunostimulatory ssRNA. This bi-functional vector not
only promoted apoptosis of hepatoma cells by silencing Pim-3, but also induced production of type I
IFN by activating TLR7 signaling. It further stimulated the activation of NK, CD4+T and CD8+T cells,
leading to enhanced anti-tumor immune responses and suppression of tumor growth. This is the first
bi-functional vector that inhibits the growth of hepatomas by promoting tumor apoptosis via
Pim-3-silencing and stimulating TLR7-dependent anti-immune responses. Similarly, we have also
constructed a dual-function TLR7-based immunostimulatory HBx-shRNA vector and used to treat
chronic HBV persistence in a mouse model. The vector showed not only potent HBV inhibition, but
also reversal of HBV-induced immunotolerance, by stimulating both intrinsic innate and systemic
adaptive immune responses (19).
Interestingly, this bi-functional ssRNA-shRNA vector showed a more significant pro-apoptotic
effect than the shRNA vector. We hypothesize that ssRNA stimulation may contribute to tumor
apoptosis. Firstly, type I IFNs induce apoptosis in several tumor cells. Although we did not observe
the direct induction of tumor apoptosis by ssRNA stimulation in Hepa 1-6 cells, we think it may
increase the susceptibility of tumor cells to apoptosis. Thus, ssRNA treatment renders tumor cell more
prone to undergo apoptosis when Pim-3 is silenced. Secondly, the ssRNA in the bi-functional vector
may enhance the silencing effect of Pim-3-shRNA, and subsequently promote the pro-apoptotic effect.
The exact mechanism of these effects needs to be further investigated.
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
18
To determine which immune cells are responsible for the tumor regression process, we depleted
of NK, CD4+T, CD8+T cells and macrophages using depletion mAb or liposomes containing DMDP,
respectively. We determined that both NK cells and T cells are required for effective tumor
suppression (Fig. 3D), while NK cells show enhanced cytotoxicity against hepatoma via augmented
NKG2D-NKG2D ligands interaction (Fig. 4). The critical role of NK cells in TLR7/8
activation-mediated anti-tumor responses has been reported (35,41), and most studies showed that the
activation of NK cells through TLR7/8 recognition requires the help of APCs; however, TLR7/8
signaling may exert a direct activating role on NK cells (35,41,42). We also demonstrated the critical
role of macrophages in the tumor suppression mediated by the dual function vector. We hypothesize
that macrophages and other APCs provide indispensable helper role for both NK and T cell activation,
possibly by activation of TLR7 on APCs. Therefore, macrophages, CD4+T, NK, and CD8+T cells all
contribute to the observed tumor regression. In addition, we found that CD4+T cells provide a helper
role in NK cell activation, predominantly by secreting Th1-type cytokines. This is in agreement with
observations in other cancer models (43,44). Surprisingly, the inhibition of TLR7 with IRS661
completely abrogated vector-induced tumor regression (Fig. 6). We assume that TLR7 activation is the
first issue for immune cells activation-induced tumor suppression. Firstly, type I IFNs induced by
TLR7 signaling may directly contribute to the activation of immune cells and tumor suppression;
secondly, type I IFNs-activated NK, CD4+T and CD8+T cells exert enhanced cyotoxicity to tumor
cells; thirdly, type I IFNs might contribute to tumor apoptosis, as described above. However, why
TLR7 inhibitor treatment can nearly completely eliminate the dual vector-induced tumor suppression
requires further investigation.
Despite accumulating evidence showing the strong immune activation induced by TLR7
stimulation and the successful immunotherapy of skin tumors by TLR7 agonists when applied
topically, their systemic use for the treatment of cancer has been delayed because of TLR7 tolerance
by repeated administration (45,46). Here, therapy with the dual function vector provided a sustained
and long-lasting stimulation rather than short-lived immune activation by TLR7 agonists, and thus will
avoid the TLR7 tolerance induced by repeated administration. This strategy might represent a
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
19
promising therapeutic approach in future therapy for HCC or other solid tumors, in which Pim-3 is
aberrantly expressed.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National 973 Basic Research Program of China
(#2013CB944901), the Natural Science Foundation of China (# 81273220, # 31200651), and the
Young and Middle-aged Scientist Award of Shandong Province (# BS2010YY033).
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
20
References
1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000; 100:57–70.
2. Adam M, Pogacic V, Bendit M, Chappuis R, Nawijn MC, Duyster J, et al. Targeting PIM kinases
impairs survival of hematopoietic cells transformed by kinase inhibitor–sensitive and kinase
inhibitor–resistant forms of Fms-Like tyrosine kinase 3 and BCR/ABL. Cancer Res 2006; 66:
7–14.
3. Brault L, Gasser C, Bracher F, Huber K, Knapp S, Schwaller J. PIM serine/threonine kinases in
the pathogenesis and therapy of hematologic malignancies and solid cancers. Haematologica
2010;95:1004–15.
4. Mukaida N, Wang YY, Li YY. Roles of Pim-3, a novel survival kinase, in tumorigenesis. Cancer
Sci 2011;102:1437–42.
5. Li YY, Popivanova BK., Nagai Y, Ishikura H, Fujii C, Mukaida N. Pim-3, a proto-oncogene with
serine/threonine kinase is aberrantly expressed in human pancreatic cancer and phosphorylates
Bad to block Bad-mediate apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cell lines activity. Cancer Res
2006; 66: 6741–7.
6. Popivanova BK, Li YY, Zheng H, Omura K, Fujii C, Tsuneyama K, .et al. Proto-oncogene, Pim-3
with serine/threonine kinase activity, is aberrantly expressed in human colon cancer cells and can
prevent Bad-mediated apoptosis. Cancer Sci 2007; 98: 321–8.
7. Fujii C, Nakamoto Y, Lu P. Aberrant expression of serine/threonine kinase Pim-3 in hepatocellular
carcinoma development and its role in the proliferation of human hepatoma cell lines. Int J Cancer
2005; 114: 209–18.
8. Bui JD, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunosurveillance, immunoediting and inflammation:
independent or interdependent processes? Curr Opin Immunol 2007;19:203–8.
9. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646–74.
10. Cavallo F, De Giovanni C, Nanni P, Forni G, Lollini PL. 2011: the immune hallmarks of cancer.
Cancer Immunol Immunother 2011;60:319–26.
11. Fu YX. New immune therapy targets tumor-associated environment: from bone marrow to tumor
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
21
site. Cell Mol Immunol 2012;9: 1–2.
12. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on
Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 2010, 11: 373–84.
13. Noppert SJ, Fitzgerald KA, Hertzog PJ. The role of type I interferons in TLR responses. Immunol
Cell Biol 2007;85:446–57.
14. Heil F, Hemmi H, Hochrein H, Ampenberger F, Kirschning C, Akira S, et al. Species-specific
recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science 2004;303:1526–9.
15. Cervantes JL, Weinerman B, Basole C, Salazar JC. TLR8: the forgotten relative revindicated. Cell
Mol Immunol 2012;9: 434–8.
16. Alter G, Suscovich TJ, Teigen N, Meier A, Streeck H, Brander C, et al. Single-stranded RNA
derived from HIV-1 serves as a potent activator of NK cells. J Immunol 2007;178:7658–66.
17. Smits EL, Ponsaerts P, Berneman ZN, Van Tendeloo VF. The use of TLR7 and TLR8 ligands for
the enhancement of cancer immunotherapy. Oncologist 2008;13:859–75.
18. Li Z, Zhang C, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Zhang J, Tian Z. Small intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes
expressing CD8 and T cell receptor γδ are involved in bacterial clearance during Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Infect Immun 2012;80:565–74.
19. Lan P, Zhang C, Han Q, Zhang J, Tian Z. Therapeutic recovery of HBV-induced
hepatocyte-intrinsic immune defect reverses systemic adaptive immune tolerance. Hepatology
2013;58:73–85.
20. Van Rooijen N, Sanders A. Liposome mediated depletion of macrophages: mechanism of action,
preparation of liposomes and applications. J Immunol Methods 1994;174:83–93.
21. Barrat FJ, Meeker T, Gregorio J, Chan JH, Uematsu S, Akira S, Chang B, et al. Nucleic acids of
mammalian origin can act as endogenous ligands for Toll-like receptors and may promote
systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med 2005;202:1131–9.
22. Pawar RD, Ramanjaneyulu A, Kulkarni OP, Lech M, Segerer S, Anders HJ. Inhibition of Toll-like
receptor-7 (TLR-7) or TLR-7 plus TLR-9 attenuates glomerulonephritis and lung injury in
experimental lupus. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:1721–31.
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
22
23. Yan B, Zemskova M, Holder S, Chin V, Kraft A, Koskinen PJ, et al. The PIM-2 kinase
phosphorylates BAD on serine 112 and reverses BAD-induced cell death. J Biol Chem
2003;278:45358–67.
24. Aho TL, Sandholm J, Peltola KJ, Mankonen HP, Lilly M, Koskinen PJ. Pim-1 kinase promotes
inactivation of the pro-apoptotic Bad protein by phosphorylating it on the Ser112 gatekeeper site.
FEBS Lett 2004; 571: 43–9.
25. Romagnani C, Della Chiesa M, Kohler S, Moewes B, Radbruch A, Moretta L, et al. Activation of
human NK cells by plasmacytoid dendritic cells and its modulation by CD4+ T helper cells and
CD4+ CD25hi T regulatory cells. Eur J Immunol 2005;35:2452–8.
26. Bihl F, Pecheur J, Bréart B, Poupon G, Cazareth J, Julia V, et al. Primed antigen-specific CD4+ T
cells are required for NK cell activation in vivo upon Leishmania major infection. J Immunol
2010;185:2174–81.
27. Diebold SS, Kaisho T, Hemmi H, Akira S, Reis e Sousa C. Innate-antiviral responses by means of
TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 2004; 303:1529–31.
28. Swartz MA, Iida N, Roberts EW, Sangaletti S, Wong MH, Yull FE, et al. Tumor
microenvironment complexity: emerging roles in cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2012;72:2473–80.
29. Swords R, Kelly K, Carew J, Nawrocki S, Mahalingam D, Sarantopoulos J, et al. The Pim
kinases: new targets for drug development. Curr Drug Targets 2011;12:2059–66.
30. Wu Y, Wang YY, Nakamoto Y, Li YY, Baba T, Kaneko S, et al. Accelerated hepatocellular
carcinoma development in mice expressing the Pim-3 transgene selectively in the liver. Oncogene
2010;29:2228–37.
31. Aho TL, Lund RJ, Ylikoski EK, Matikainen S, Lahesmaa R, Koskinen PJ. Expression of human
pim family genes is selectively up-regulated by cytokines promoting T helper type 1, but not T
helper type 2, cell differentiation. Immunology 2005;116:82–8.
32. Matikainen S, Sareneva T, Ronni T, Lehtonen A, Koskinen PJ, Julkunen I. Interferon-alpha
activates multiple STAT proteins and upregulates proliferation-associated IL-2Ralpha, c-myc, and
pim-1 genes in human T cells. Blood 1999;93:1980–91.
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
23
33. Li YY, Wu Y, Tsuneyama K, Baba T, Mukaida N. Essential contribution of Ets-1 to
constitutive Pim-3 expression in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Sci 2009;100:396–404.
34. Mukaida N, Wang YY, Li YY. Roles of Pim-3, a novel survival kinase, in tumorigenesis. Cancer
Sci 2011;102:1437–42.
35. Bourquin C, Schmidt L, Lanz AL, Storch B, Wurzenberger C, Anz D, Sandholzer N, Mocikat R,
Berger M, Poeck H, Hartmann G, Hornung V, Endres S. Immunostimulatory RNA
oligonucleotides induce an effective antitumoral NK cell response through the TLR7. J Immunol
2009;183:6078–86.
36. Anz D, Koelzer VH, Moder S, Thaler R, Schwerd T, Lahl K, Sparwasser T, Besch R, Poeck H,
Hornung V, Hartmann G, Rothenfusser S, Bourquin C, Endres S. Immunostimulatory RNA blocks
suppression by regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2010;184:939–46.
37. Lin KJ, Lin TM, Wang CH, Liu HC, Lin YL, Eng HL. Down-regulation of Toll-like receptor 7
expression in hepatitis-virus-related human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Pathol
2013;44:534–41.
38. Chang S, Kodys K, Szabo G. Impaired expression and function of toll-like receptor 7 in hepatitis
C virus infection in human hepatoma cells. Hepatology 2010;51:35–42.
39. Khairuddin N, Gantier MP, Blake SJ, Wu SY, Behlke MA, Williams BR, McMillan NA.
siRNA-induced immunostimulation through TLR7 promotes antitumoral activity against
HPV-driven tumors in vivo. Immunol Cell Biol 2012;90:187–96.
40. Fotin-Mleczek M, Duchardt KM, Lorenz C, Pfeiffer R, Ojkić-Zrna S, Probst J, et al. Messenger
RNA-based vaccines with dual activity induce balanced TLR-7 dependent adaptive immune
responses and provide antitumor activity. J Immunother 2011;34:1–15.
41. Berger M, Ablasser A, Kim S, Bekeredjian-Ding I, Giese T, Endres S, Hornung V, Hartmann G.
TLR8-driven IL-12-dependent reciprocal and synergistic activation of NK cells and monocytes by
immunostimulatory RNA. J Immunother 2009;32:262–71.
42. Hart OM, Athie-Morales V, O'Connor GM, Gardiner CM. TLR7/8-mediated activation of human
NK cells results in accessory cell-dependent IFN-gamma production. J Immunol
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
24
2005;175:1636–42.
43. Perez-Diez A, Joncker NT, Choi K, Chan WF, Anderson CC, Lantz O, Matzinger P. CD4 cells can
be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells. Blood 2007;109:5346–54.
44. Li Z, Pradera F, Kammertoens T, Li B, Liu S, Qin Z. Cross-talk between T cells and innate
immune cells is crucial for IFN-gamma-dependent tumor rejection. J Immunol
2007;179:1568–76.
45. Tsukada K, Kitazawa T, Fukushima A, Okugawa S, Yanagimoto S, Tatsuno K, Koike K, Nagase
H, Hirai K, Ota Y. Macrophage tolerance induced by stimulation with Toll-like receptor 7/8
ligands. Immunol Lett 2007;111:51–6.
46. Bourquin C, Hotz C, Noerenberg D, Voelkl A, Heidegger S, Roetzer LC, Storch B, Sandholzer N,
Wurzenberger C, Anz D, Endres S. Systemic cancer therapy with a small molecule agonist of
toll-like receptor 7 can be improved by circumventing TLR tolerance. Cancer Res
2011;71:5123–33.
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
25
Figure Legends
Figure 1. The construction of a bi-functional vector bearing ssRNA and Pim-3-specific short
hairpin RNA (shRNA). A, Schematic of the construction of the dual functional vector. B, The
expression of Pim-3 in Hepa1-6 cell line was measured by RT-PCR (left) and western blotting (right)
after transfection for 24 h with indicated vectors. C, Real-Time PCR analysis of IFN-α or IFN-β gene
expression in Hepa1-6 cells after transfection in vitro. D, The levels of IFN-α or IFN-β in the culture
supernatants of Hepa1-6 cells, measured by ELISA after transfection with the indicated vectors for 24
h. Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments. **, P < 0.01, compared with the pSIREN
transcription group.
Figure 2. Transfection with shRNA and bi-functional vector promotes the apoptosis of hepatoma
cells in vitro. A, Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis in Hepa1-6 cells after transfection for 24 h
with indicated vectors using AnnexinV/PI double staining. B, TUNEL staining to evaluate apoptosis
of hepatoma cells after transfection for 24 h via observation of Red fluorescence. An arrowhead
indicates shrinking nuclei. Data are shown as representatives (left) or means ± SD (right) from three
independent experiments. **, P < 0.01, compared with the pSIREN transcription group.
Figure 3. Treatment with bi-functional vector delays tumor growth in vivo. A-C, C57BL/6 mice
were subcutaneous challenged with 1 × 106 Hepa1-6 cells, and 2 weeks later LV-ctrl, LV-ssRNA,
LV-shRNA, and LV-dual (MOI = 50) were administered intratumorally for 14 d once a week. Tumor
volumes were calculated (B). The percentages of NK, CD4+T , CD8+T cells and CD69+ NK or T cells
(C) in splenic lymphocytes from hepatoma-bearing mice were determined by flow cytometry. Data are
representative of three independent experiments with three mice per group. D, Hepatoma-bearing
mice were injected i.p. with 1 mg of depleting antibodies (α-CD8β, α-CD4, α-NK1.1) for 3 days to
deplete T and NK cells. To deplete macrophages, 1 mg liposomes containing DMDP was administered
i.p. 48 h prior to treatment. The LV-dual vector (MOI = 50) was administered intra-tumorally once a
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
26
week for twice. Two weeks later, the growth of hepatoma was observed and tumor volumes were
calculated. Data are representative of three independent experiments with 5 mice per group. *, P <
0.05, **, P < 0.01, compared with the LV-ctrl group.
Figure 4. NK cells are involved in the suppression of hepatomas mediated by the bifunctional
vector in a NKG2D-dependent manner. A, The cytotoxicity of NK cells was determined by
measuring (using CFSE/7-AAD assay) the ability of splenic lymphocytes in treated mice to kill
Hepa1-6 cells. B, The percentages of NKG2D+, NKG2A+, IFN-γ+ or PD-1+ NK cells were determined
via FACS. C, The expression of NKG2D ligands H-60 and MULT-1 on Hepa1-6 cells was confirmed
via FACS after transfection with indicated vectors for 24 h. D, The cytotoxicity of splenic NK cells
from hepatoma-bearing mice treated with bi-functional vectors against Hepa1-6 cells, determined by
the CFSE/7-AAD assay, after incubation with or without NKG2D blocking mAbs. Data are
representative or means ± SD of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, compared
with the LV-ctrl or LV-ctrl + isotype group.
Figure 5. CD4+T cells are important for NK cell activation after stimulation with the
bifunctional vector. A, Flow cytometry of PD-1+ cells in splenic CD4+T cells. B, Serum levels of
Th1- and Th2- type cytokines detected by ELISA. C, The proportion of total NK or CD69+ NK cells
in spleens identified by FACS after CD4+T cell depletion. D, Splenic NK cells from tumor mice (with
or without CD4+T cell depletion) treated with bi-functional vector were isolated and their cytotoxicity
against Hepa1-6 cells was confirmed via the CFSE/7-AAD assay. Data are shown as means ± SD of
three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, compared with the LV-ctrl group or isotype
control group.
Figure 6. The TLR7 pathway is critical for NK cell activation and the inhibition of the growth of
hepatoma resulting from bi-functional vector therapy. A, TLR expression was analyzed in Hepa1-6
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
27
cells after transfection with indicated vectors via real-time PCR. B, western blotting of the expression
of TLR7 and related signaling molecules in Hepa1-6 cells after transfection in vitro. C, Tumor
performance in hepatoma-bearing mice treated with bi-functional vector with or without
co-administration of TLR7 inhibitor. Tumor volumes were calculated. D, The percentages of IFN-γ,
Perforin or CD69 positive splenic NK cells in mice treated with bi-functional vector were determined
via flow cytometry. E, The percentages of IFN-γ, CD25 or CD69 positive CD4+T cells were detected
via flow cytometry. Data are representative of three independent experiments with four mice per
group. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, compared with the pSIREN transcription or solvent group.
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722
Published OnlineFirst April 10, 2014.Mol Cancer Ther Qie Guo, Peixiang Lan, Xin Yu, et al. both immunostimulatory and Pim-3-silencing effectsImmunotherapy for hepatoma using a dual-function vector with
Updated version
10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722doi:
Access the most recent version of this article at:
Material
Supplementary
http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2014/04/10/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722.DC1
Access the most recent supplemental material at:
Manuscript
Authoredited. Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2014/04/10/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
on October 11, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 10, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0722