IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005 Friction (and Shear) n Gas u Origin of Viscosity u...
-
Upload
lester-allison -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
2
Transcript of IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005 Friction (and Shear) n Gas u Origin of Viscosity u...
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Friction (and Shear)
Gas Origin of Viscosity Mix of gases
Liquid Origin of Viscosity Effect of foreign materials
Dilute vs Concentrated (sol-gel) Non-newtonian Fluids
Concentrated Effect of non-spherical dispersed materials Presence of structure
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Gas
123
VY
X
Gas Kinetic Theory of gas Non polar, low density
22
33
2
d
Tm
Mean Free Path is large Molecular movement between 1 and 2 (and 2 and 1, etc) Momentum Transfer between planes ==> viscosity Increase Temp ==> Increase velocity, Viscosity
Rigid Spheres
dy
dVx
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Gas
Accounting for van der Waals attractive force Lennard-Jones potential
26107.2
MT Sigma- collision dia
omega- collision integral M -molecular wt
Mix of gases2
4
12
1
2
1
\
118
1
i
j
j
i
j
iij M
M
M
M
iji
iimix x
x
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Liquids Theory is not as well developed
Eyring’s Theory Inter-molecular forces cause viscosity (NOT moving molecules) Temp increase ==> more energy for molecule ==> less viscosity
Similar to reaction equilibrium
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Liquid Viscosity
State
Energy A
B
C
To go from A to C, the particle should have energy EAct(Activation Energy)
Energy released is heat of reaction ERxn
ActE
RxnE
For Liquid movement EA and EC are same
Application of stress shifts A up and C down
==> Movement from left to rightState
Energy A
B
C
ActE
RxnE A’ C’
Force
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Dilute solutions Assume
No interaction between particles Spherical, uncharged
Liquid velocity on particle surface = particle surface velocity
fractionvoleff .5.21 Newtonian behavior Emulsions will show lower viscosity
particles do not shear, emulsions will surface contamination will increase emulsion viscosity
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Non newtonian fluids When one or more of the assumptions are violated Usually heterogenous
Higher concentration (eg 40% of blood has red blood cells in plasma) ==> interaction between particles Non spherical particles Electrically charged (not discussed here)
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Non newtonian fluids High concentration (high is relative) Interaction, structure formation
Structural viscosity
Application of shear stress breaks structure over time ==> thixotropic breaks structure quickly, more stress ==> more disintegration ==> pseudoplastic alternate: cylinders, ellipses align better with flow under higher shear ==> pseudoplastic thixotropic (60 sec) --> pseudoplastic
L
D
Axis Ratio = L/D
D
Lfeff
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Non newtonian fluids Dilatant: Mostly solids with some fluid in between
Low stress ==> lubrication and less viscosity higher stress ==> insufficient lubrication, more viscosity
Stress
Strain
Newtonian
Dilatant
Pseudo plastic
Bingham Plastic
Bingham Plastic Minimum yield stress Newtonian
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Non newtonian Fluids: Models
dx
dVNewtonian :
n
dx
dVKDilatentticPseudoplas
:,
factoryconsistencK
indexlawpowern
dx
dVPlasticBingham 0:
stressyield0
dependenttimecThixotropielasticVisco ,
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Non Newtonian Fluids:Models
Viscoelastic: usually coiled or connected structure stretched (not broken) by stress recoil after stress is released normal stress on pipe != 0 eg. Pull back after the applied force is removed
Non-newtonian != high viscosity Many polymers added to reduce friction in water
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Fluid flow in a pipe Hagen-Poiseuille’s law
Momentum balance
Assumptions Laminar flow steady state no-slip incompressible
xr
r
Vols
VoldVt
dAnVVF )(.
rrxrrrxxxx dxrdxrdrrPdrrPF 2222
022. xxxxxxx
s
VrrVVrrVdAnVV Pressure drop = friction
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Fluid flow in a pipe xr
r
r
Cr
dx
dPrx
1
2
0
dr
rd
dx
dPr rx
finiter ,0 2
r
dx
dPrx
Newtonian xrx
dV
dr
2
32
D
V
x
P avg
Flow Rate Average Velocity
22
14 R
rR
dx
dPVx
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Non newtonian: power law fluidFluid flow in a pipe
n
dx
dVK
n
nn
nn
x rRn
n
dx
dP
KV
111
12
1
Flow Rate Average Velocity
Double the pressure != double velocity
2
0 0
,R
Q V r r dr d
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Non newtonian: Bingham PlasticFluid flow in a pipe
Flow Rate Average Velocity
Double the pressure != double velocity
dx
dVPlasticBingham 0:
arfor
220 1
4 R
rR
dx
dPrRVx
0xV arfor
dxdP
a 02
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Flow between plates
Micro fluidics Identification of DNA fragments (for example) Flow rate depends on
Viscosity Surface Tension Sample movement rate depends on affinity
Sample 1
Sample 2
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Flow between plates
X
Y
Z
Steady state Incompressible Laminar flow no-slip
Element of width length X, height Y and width (or depth) of 1 unit
Vols
VoldVt
dAnVVF )(.
yyyxyyxxxx XXYPYPF
2b
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Flow between plates
0
dy
d
dx
dP yx1Cy
dx
dPyx
By symmetry, at the center, shear stress =0 ydx
dPyx
Newtonian
dy
dVxyx
1
2
2
1C
y
dx
dPVx
Flow rate Average velocity
byVx @,0
2
1 2yb
dx
dPVx
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Flow between plates Non newtonian : Power law fluids
n
dx
dVK
1
11
11
1
C
n
ydxdP
K
dxdPK
V
n
w
byVx @,0
0@, yw
Flow rate Average velocity
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Examples Pipe flow Fluid flow ~= Current flow P = Voltage, Vavg = current avgV
D
xP
2
32
Resistance Non-newtonian fluid: non-linear relation
between P and Vavg
Newtonian fluid: easier prediction of results of changing one or more parameters
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Example Non newtonian : Bingham Plastic
42
3
1
3
41
32mm
x
PDVavg PD
Lm
04 1m
smkg /2.0Pa200 3/2000 mkg
H=10 m
L=20m/5m
D=0.1m082.04 0
PD
Lm
89.0factor
smVavg /6.13
02.04 0
PD
Lm
97.0factor smVavg /4.59
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Example Find the time taken to drain the tank
1
221 A
VAV
dt
dH
H=10 m
L=20m/5m
D=0.1m
V2 is a function of H
Tank will not drain completely!
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Example Non newtonian : Power law fluid
n
n
avg xK
PD
n
n
xK
PDV
12
431
4
32
smVm
kgn
mskgKcmDP
avg /1,2000,5.0
,/5.2,1?,
3
2
3
MPaP 79.0
1m/s
25 m Long, 1cm dia
MPaP 12.1
If flow rate has to be doubled, pressure needed
navg PCV
1
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Example Pbm. 8.2
Given, L12=22 km, L23=18 km, Q, P known
Consider this as resistance model
2
32
D
V
x
P avg
L12 L23
4
128
D
Q
2312 LLafterbefore PPPP
4
13
D
QLKP beforebefore
4
1212 D
QLKP after
4
2323 2
1
D
QLKP after
31/40
223
12
13
L
L
L
Q
Q
before
after
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Viscometers Tube,Cone&Plate,Narrow gap cylinder, infinite gap
cylinder
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Viscometers Cone and Plate Viscometer Ref: BSL, pbm 2B.11
0
22 0
tofromchangecan
drdr
X
TorquevelangularRGiven ,,
)2
tan(,)sin( 000
h
yrVx
YA
rV
Goal: Shear Stress, Velocity Profile, Torque
Fluid between two plates, linear profile
0
2
rV
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Viscometers Shear stress vs Velocity: Spherical Co-ordinates
V
r
V
r sin
1
sin
sin
22
2
sin
cossin
sin
sin
r
VV
r
Shear Stress at cone: )tan(,2 0
0
, , ,independent of r z
Force, Torque
drdrF
rdrdrTorque
R
drdrTorque0
2
0
2
0
0
3
3
2
R
Torque
Practical 0 ~ 1o
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Viscometers Cylindrical viscometer
rgapplatesparallelgapNarrow ,
r
r
r
r
V
dr
dV
rrLrFTorque 2
Vary , obtain Torque and velocity gradients for plots
Torque
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Differential momentum balance:Navier-Stokes Equation
Newtonian Fluids ONLY Assumptions/applicability:
Isothermal conditions both Compressible/Incompressible both laminar/turbulent Stokes assumption for bulk-viscosity (needed for
compressible fluids)
0.,2 VifVPgDt
DV
0. VDt
D Continuity (Velocity Divergence)
0, ifPgDt
DV
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Appendix
Pbm. 8.6 Given, L=8m,P=207kPa, d=.635 cm, Find velocity for no friction vs friction
22
22
11
21
22gh
Pvgh
Pv
P
VhhV
2
,0 2211
Frictional effects
LPD
V32
2
2
2.11
2322
cos
PD
L
V
V
viscous
ityVisNo
1 2
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005
Appendix: Blood Flow in Arteries 40% red blood cells in plasma, non-newtonian Pulsating motion, varying pressure Re = 600, during exercise 6000 Blood vessel dilation , short term, long term Shear stress vs platelet activation (wound vs
stenosis); ultrasonic detection Tensile vs compressive stress; structure of blood
vessel Collapse of vessel during BP measurement Collapse near stenosis and cardiac arrest Mass & heat transport