III. The Molecular Orbital Model
description
Transcript of III. The Molecular Orbital Model
-
III. The Molecular Orbital ModelProblems with the L.E. ModelAssumes all e- are localized; this is not what is observedUnpaired e- are not described very well at allGives us no clue to bond energies
Molecular Orbital ModelSimilar to atomic theory, but develops orbitals for a whole moleculeGives molecular orbitals that electrons go intoProperties of the molecular orbitals (MOs)Each MO can hold 2 e- of opposite spinShape of the MO represents probability of where e- is
H2 Molecular Orbital Description1.We can construct our MOs from the AOs we already knowMO1 = 1sa + 1sb MO2 = 1sa - 1sb
-
Size, shape, and energy of MOs
MO1 = s-MOLarge probability between H nuclei = s interactionLower energy than H 1s orbitals = bonding MOThe 2 total valence e- pair up, giving a stabilization = bondMO2 = s*-MOLarge probability bracketing H nuclei = s interactionHigher energy than H 1s orbitals = antibonding MONo electrons in this MOs1ss*1s
-
5.H2- has three electronsLess stable than H2 One e- in antibonding MO
Bond Order = Difference between the number of bonding electrons and number of antibonding electrons divided by two.
Example of B. O.H2 = (2 0)/2 = 1 (single bond strength)H2- = (2 1)/2 = 0.5 (less than single bond strength, but stable)He2 = (2 2)/2 = 0 (not stable, not a diatomic molecule)
-
I. Bonding in Homonuclear DiatomicsLi, Be, BLi2 MO descriptionLi 1s22s1, but we can only use valence e- (2s) in bonding1s orbital is core and cant be reached for bondingMOs for Li2
Bond Order = (2 0)/2 = 1, so it is stable
MO electron configuration would be s2s2 Li2 is stable, but only occurs as a gas
-
Be2 uses the same MOs as Li2but is s2s2 s*2s2 Bond Order = (2-2)/2 = 0Be2 is not a stable diatomicB2 must begin to use MOs generated from 2p AOsB = 1s22s22p1 p-orbital MO combinations
-
c.Head-on overlap gives s2p and s*2p interactions
Side-on overlap gives p2p and p*2p interactions.There are 2 such interactions each, because of the 2Perpendicular p-orbitals not involved in the s-bond.
2s--2s overlap is more favorable, at lower energy
Bond Order = (4 2)/2 = 1, stable diatomic
IV.MagnetismA.Magnetic Balance
-
Diamagnetic = repelled by a magnetic fieldPaired e- are diamagneticH2 is diamagnetic because all of its e- are pairedMost compounds are diamagnetic because paired e- are favorableRepulsion is very weak
Paramagnetic = attracted by a magnetic fielda.unpaired electrons are paramagneticb.much stronger than diamagnetismc.Relatively few compounds have unpaired e-
B.Magnetism and MO Theory1.We predicted from MO theory that B2 would be diamagnetic2.Experiment shows us that it is paramagnetic.3.We must adjust our model to explain this
-
We must allow our model to take into account 2s/2p interaction2s/2p mixing changes the ordering of some of our MOsSpacing is no longer symmetricPredicts paramagnetism of B2 d. Bond Order is still 1
-
Other homonuclear diatomicsC2 and N2 use same ordering and MO set as B2O2 and F2 have different ordering because s/p mixing changes
-
Trends in 2nd row diatomicsAs Bond Order increase, Bond Energy increases, Bond Length decreasesBond Order doesnt completely predict Bond EnergyB2 > F2 even though both have BO = 1F2 has much electron repulsion, weakening the bondN2 bond order = (8-2)/2 = 3. This triple bond is very strong and explains why N2 is very unreactive.O2 is paramagnetic.
V.Heteronuclear Diatomics: Different elements have different A.O. energiesA.Adjacent elements are the most similar (NO, CN, etc)We can use same MOs as for homonuclear diatomics for adjacentsNO Bond Order = (8-3)/2 = 2.5
-
MO Theory better handles unpaired e-Paramagnetic
5.NO+ and CN- have the same configurationBO = (8-2)/2 = 3 (triple bonds)We can use the same figureDiamagnetic
-
Elements far apart have very different energiesWe must devise new MO ordering for each caseHF (use H1s and F2p)F much lower energy (more tightly bound e-)F2p < H1s so the electrons will be closer to F (Predicts Electronegativity!!!)
-
VI. Combining LE and MO ModelsResonance StructuresL.E. model is not very accurate in some cases where more than one Lewis Structure can be drawnResonance structures = equivalent, but not exact representations of the bonding in a molecule
O3
NO3-
Benzene
-
s-bonds can be localized without problems; Use LE Model p-bonds need to Delocalize in some molecules for stabilityStill use LE Model to describe the s-bondingUse MO model to describe p-bondingSimple as possible, but must be accurateBenzene
-
4. NO3-