III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface...

22
III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture

Transcript of III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface...

Page 1: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

III. Sound as Media

2. Radio Culture

Page 2: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

1. Radio as imagined community (Hilmes)

2. Radio as interface (Fickers)

3. Radio as not radio: sonic social technical communities online (Pinch & Athanasiades)

4. Radio as art (Amacher, Lozano-Hemmer)

Page 3: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Telefunken ad from 1957

Page 4: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Radio as imagined community:

• Benedict Anderson’s description of the modern print-influenced citizen // radio listener

• “Unity, connection, and communication in its purest sense.” (p. 352)

• Simultaneity of experience – without direct contact

Page 5: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

• Exposure to the public – in the privacy of one’s home

• “Radio’s ‘immateriality’ allowed it to cross these boundaries: allowed ‘race’ music to invade the white middle-class home, vaudeville to compete with opera in the living room, risqué city humor to raise rural eyebrows, salesmen and entertainers to find a place in the family circle.” (p. 355)

Page 6: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

• Radio’s power to unify the nation culturally – what national culture?

»Commercialism»Utopian discourse of uplift and

education»Dystopian fear of the popular»Vast audiences of women»Linguistic unity»Enforcement of cultural norms

Page 7: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Telefunken ads from the 1930s

Page 8: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Radio as interface:

• Mental mapping - the cognitive production of an individualized representation of experience space

• The ether (an imagined space)

• “The magic comes from entering a world of sound and from using that sound to make your own vision, your own dream, your own world.” (Susan Douglas quoted on p. 415)

Page 9: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

• “Radioitis”—Schaudenken

• Emergence of a European radio infrastructure:

• Union International de Radiodiffusion/International Broadcasting Union (UIR/IBU) was formed in 1925

• IBU’s “ether police” (permanent Technical Center)

Page 10: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

• The use of the frequency meter and calibrated station scale – the materialization of a regulatory regime (p.421)

• Superheterodyne circuit (“superhets” or “super”)

• Valundia system and Auto-Skala

Page 11: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

• “Station scales, then, served as early atlases of globalization, and one may interpret the use of radio in the 1920s and 1930s as a symbolic appropriation of the European broadcasting landscape.” (p. 432)

Page 12: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Telefunken ad from 1969

Page 13: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Radio as not-radio (sonic technosocial communities online):

• An ethnographic study of ACIDplanet.com

• ACID turns the computer into a recording studio and enables users to make music, post/share, and review each other’s music

• Review system (comments and star-rating;

a “translation mode”) and contests (remixes and mash-ups)

Page 14: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

• Users: provide most of the content, form a devoted community; more organic than regular file-sharing systems

• Public interaction – visible to all users

• Special sociotechnical instruments / scopic focusing technologies: allow users to focus on certain selected pieces of content

• Double sociality – economies of reputation

Page 15: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

• Transduction

• New and old identities and systems - possibilities, problems, and contradictions

Page 16: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Comparative Analysis

In small groups, examine and discuss two online sites:

www.acidplanet.com

www.bbc.co.uk/radio

Page 17: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Consider these online spaces in relationship to the following ideas and issues from our study of radio culture:

• What kinds of communities do these sites create and foster?

• What kinds of mental mapping do their interfaces reflect?

• What kinds of identities and reputations do they produce for their users?

Page 18: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

Frequency and Volume: Relational Architecture 9 (2003)by Rafael Lozano-Hemmer

Page 19: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.

November 2012 – February 2013, SFMOMAPart of 2012 ZERO1 Biennial

Page 20: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.
Page 21: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.
Page 22: III. Sound as Media 2. Radio Culture. 1.Radio as imagined community (Hilmes) 2.Radio as interface (Fickers) 3.Radio as not radio: sonic social technical.