(II) FFECTIVE FIELD THEORIES FOR HOT AND DENSE …theor.jinr.ru/~dm2008/lectures/blaschke2.pdf ·...
Transcript of (II) FFECTIVE FIELD THEORIES FOR HOT AND DENSE …theor.jinr.ru/~dm2008/lectures/blaschke2.pdf ·...
EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORIES FOR HOT AND DENSE MATTER (II)NJL MODEL AND ITS RELATIVES
David Blaschke
Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Wroclaw, Poland
Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, JINR Dubna, Russia
•NJL Model and its Polyakov-Loop Extension:
– Mesonic correlations - Mott Effect
– Polyakov-Loop NJL Model
•Nonlocal, separable NJL Model
– 3D Formfactors, 4D Formfactors and Phase Diagram
– Rank-2 Extension - Schwinger-Dyson type Approach
•Summary / Outlook to a Unified Quark-Hadron Approach
Literature: Hansen et al., Phys. Rev. D75, 065004 (2007); Gomez Dumm et al., Phys. Rev.D73, 114019 (2006); arXiv:0807.1660; Blaschke et al., arXiv:0705.0384; Schmidt et al., Phys.Rev. C50, 435 (1994); Zablocki at al., arXiv:0805.2687
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
1
HADRONIC CORRELATIONS IN THE PHASEDIAGRAM OF QCD
Model
Field Theory
Quark
Chiral
NICA − MPD
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
3
CHIRAL MODEL FIELD THEORY FOR QUARK MATTER
•Partition function as a Path Integral (imaginary time τ = i t)
Z[T, V, µ] =
∫
DψDψ exp
−
∫ β
dτ
∫
V
d3x[ψ[iγµ∂µ −m− γ0(µ + λ8µ8 + iλ3φ3]ψ −Lint + U(Φ)]
Polyakov loop: Φ = N−1c Trc[exp(iβλ3φ3)]
•Current-current interaction (4-Fermion coupling)Lint =
∑
M=π,σ,...GM(ψΓMψ)2 +∑
DGD(ψCΓDψ)2
•Bosonization (Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation)
Z[T, V, µ] =
∫
DMMD∆†DD∆D exp
−∑
M,D
M 2M
4GM−
|∆D|2
4GD+
1
2Tr lnS−1[MM, ∆D,Φ] + U(Φ)
•Collective quark fields: Mesons (MM) and Diquarks (∆D); Gluon mean field: Φ
•Systematic evaluation: Mean fields + Fluctuations
– Mean-field approximation: order parameters for phase transitions (gap equations)
– Lowest order fluctuations: hadronic correlations (bound & scattering states)
– Higher order fluctuations: hadron-hadron interactions
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
4
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (I)
SU(Nc) pure gauge sector: Polyakov line
L (~x) ≡ P exp
[
i
∫ β
0
dτ A4 (~x, τ )
]
; A4 = iA0
Polyakov loop
l(~x) =1
NcTrL(~x) , 〈l(~x)〉 = e−β∆FQ(~x).
ZNc symmetric phase: 〈l(~x)〉 = 0 =⇒ ∆FQ → ∞: Confinement !Polyakov loop field:
Φ(~x) ≡ 〈〈l(~x)〉〉 =1
NcTrc 〈〈L(~x)〉〉
Potential for the PL-meanfield Φ(~x) =const., which fits quenched QCD lattice thermodynamics
U(
Φ, Φ;T)
T 4= −
b2 (T )
2ΦΦ −
b36
(
Φ3 + Φ3)
+b44
(
ΦΦ)2
,
b2 (T ) = a0 + a1
(
T0
T
)
+ a2
(
T0
T
)2
+ a3
(
T0
T
)3
.a0 a1 a2 a3 b3 b4
6.75 -1.95 2.625 -7.44 0.75 7.5
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
5
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (II)
Temperature dependence of the Polyakov-loop potential U(Φ, Φ;T )
0
1
2
3
4
5
-1.5-1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5Re Φ
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Im Φ
-2-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
U( Φ ) / T4
T = 0.26 GeV< T0
“Color confinement”
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
-1.5-1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5Re Φ
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Im Φ
-3-2.5
-2-1.5
-1-0.5
0 0.5
U( Φ ) / T4
T = 1.0 GeV> T0
“Color deconfinement”
Critical temperature for pure gauge SUc(3) lattice simulations: T0 = 270 MeV.
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
6
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (III)
Lagrangian for Nf = 2, Nc = 3 quark matter, coupled to the gauge sector
LPNJL = q(iγµDµ − m + γ0µ)q +G1
[
(qq)2 + (qiγ5~τq)2]
− U(
Φ[A], Φ[A];T)
,
Dµ = ∂µ − iAµ; Aµ = δµ0A0 (Polyakov gauge), with A0 = −iA4
Diagrammatic Hartree equation: = +>
S0(p) = = −(p/−m0 + γ0(µ− iA4))−1 ; S(p) = = −(p/−m + γ0(µ− iA4))
−1
Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking σ = m−m0 6= 0? Solve Gap Equation!
m−m0 = 2G1T Tr
+∞∑
n=−∞
∫
Λ
d3p
(2π)3−1
p/−m + γ0(µ− iA4)
= 2G1NfNc
∫
Λ
d3p
(2π)32m
Ep[1 − f+
Φ (Ep) − f−Φ (Ep)]
With the modified quark distribution functions
f±Φ (Ep) =
(
Φ + 2Φe−β(Ep∓µ))
e−β(Ep∓µ) + e−3β(Ep∓µ)
1 + 3(
Φ + Φe−β(Ep∓µ))
e−β(Ep∓µ) + e−3β(Ep∓µ)
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
7
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (IV)
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4T @GeVD
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1XΨ
Ψ\XΨ
Ψ\T=0
F
0 0.5 1 1.5 2T/T
c
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 nq/T
3
µ=0.6 Tc
Grand canonical thermodynamical potential
Ω(T, µ; Φ,m) =σ2
2G− 6Nf
∫
d3p
(2π)3Ep θ
(
Λ2 − ~p 2)
− 2Nf T
∫
d3p
(2π)3
Trc ln[
1 + L e−(Ep−µ)/T]
+ Trc ln[
1 + L† e−(Ep+µ)/T]
+ U(
Φ, Φ, T)
Appearance of quarks below Tc largely suppressed:
ln det[
1 + L e−(Ep−µ)/T]
+ ln det[
1 + L† e−(Ep+µ)/T]
= ln[
1 + 3(
Φ + Φe−(Ep−µ)/T)
e−(Ep−µ)/T + e−3(Ep−µ)/T]
+ ln[
1 + 3(
Φ + Φe−(Ep+µ)/T)
e−(Ep+µ)/T + e−3(Ep+µ)/T]
.
Accordance with QCD lattice susceptibilities! Example:
nq (T, µ)
T 3= −
1
T 3
∂Ω (T, µ)
∂µ,
Ratti, Thaler, Weise, PRD 73 (2006) 014019.
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
8
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (V)
Mesonic currents
JaP (x) = q(x)iγ5τaq(x) (pion) ; JS(x) = q(x)q(x) − 〈q(x)q(x)〉 (sigma)
... and correlation functions
CPPab (q2) ≡ i
∫
d4xeiq.x〈0|T(
JaP (x)J b†P (0))
|0〉 = CPP (q2)δab
CSSab (q2) ≡ i
∫
d4xeiq.x〈0|T(
JS(x)J †S(0)
)
|0〉
Schwinger-Dyson Equations, T = µ = 0
CMM(q2) = ΠMM (q2) +∑
M ′
ΠMM ′(q2)(2G1)C
M ′M(q2)
One-loop polarization functions
ΠMM ′(q2) ≡
∫
Λ
d4p
(2π)4Tr (ΓMS(p + q)ΓM ′S(q))
Hartree quark propagator S(p)
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
9
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (VI)
Example of the pion channel:
ΠPP (q2) = −4iNcNf
∫
Λ
d4p
(2π)4m2 − p2 + q2/4
[(p + q/2)2 −m2][(p− q/2)2 −m2]= 4iNcNfI1 − 2iNcNfq
2I2(q2)
Loop Integrals:
I1 =
∫
Λ
d4p
(2π)41
p2 −m2; I2(q
2) =
∫
Λ
d4p
(2π)41
[(p + q)2 −m2] [p2 −m2]
With pseudoscalar decay constant (fP ) and gap equation for I1
f 2P (q2) = −4iNcm
2I2(q2) ; I1 =
m−m0
8iG1mNcNf,
One obtains ΠPP (q2) = m−m0
2G1m+ f 2
P (q2) q2
m2 ; ΠSS(q2) = m−m0
2G1m+ f 2
P (q2)q2−4m2
m2 . In the chiral limit(m0 = 0), the correlation functions
CMM (q2) = ΠMM (q2) + ΠMM (q2)(2G1)CMM (q2) =
ΠMM (q2)
1 − 2G1ΠMM (q2), M = P, S ,
have poles at q2 = M 2P = 0 (Pion) and q2 = M 2
S = (2m)2 (Sigma meson) =⇒ Check !
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
10
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (VII)
Finite T, µ: p = (p0, ~p) → (iωn + µ− iA4, ~p) ; i∫
Λd4p
(2π)4→ −T 1
NcTrc
∑
n
∫
Λd3p
(2π)3
I1 = −i
∫
Λ
d3p
(2π)31 − f(Ep − µ) − f(Ep + µ)
2Ep
I2(ω, ~q) = i
∫
Λ
d3p
(2π)31
2Ep2Ep+q
f(Ep + µ) + f(Ep − µ) − f(Ep+q + µ) − f(Ep+q − µ)
ω − Ep+q + Ep
+i
∫
Λ
d3p
(2π)31 − f(Ep − µ) − f(Ep+q + µ)
2Ep2Ep+q
(
1
ω + Ep+q + Ep−
1
ω −Ep+q − Ep
)
(1)
For a meson at rest in the medium (~q = 0)
I2
(
ω,~0)
= −i
∫
Λ
d3p
(2π)31 − f(Ep + µ) − f(Ep − µ)
Ep
(
ω2 − 4E2p
)
which develops an imaginary part
=m (−iI2(ω, 0)) =1
16π
(
1 − f(ω
2− µ
)
− f(ω
2+ µ
))
√
ω2 − 4m2
ω2×Θ(ω2−4m2)Θ(4(Λ2+m2)−ω2)
with the Pauli-blocking factor: N(ω, µ) =(
1 − f(
ω2− µ
)
− f(
ω2
+ µ))
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
11
POLYAKOV-LOOP NAMBU–JONA-LASINIO MODEL (VIII)
Spectral function
FMM (ω, ~q) ≡ =mCMM(ω + iη, ~q) = =mΠMM (ω + iη, ~q)
1 − 2G1ΠMM (ω + iη, ~q).
FMM (ω) =π
2G1
1
π
2G1=mΠMM(ω + iη)
(1 − 2G1<eΠMM (ω))2 + (2G1=mΠMM(ω + iη))2 . (2)
For ω < 2m(T, µ), =mΠ = 0: decay channel closed → bound state!
FMM(ω) =π
2G1δ(
1 − 2G1<eΠMM (ω))
=π
4G21
∣
∣
∣
∂<eΠMM
∂ω
∣
∣
∣
ω=mM
δ(ω −mM) .
The meson mass mM is the solution of
1 − 2G1<eΠMM (mM) = 0
The decay width (inverse lifetime) is
ΓM = 2G1=mΠMM (mM)
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
12
PION CORRELATIONS IN THE PHASE DIAGRAM
0 100 200 300 400µ [MeV]
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
T [
MeV
]
2SC
Γπ>50 MeV
χSB
ηD
= 1.00
Γπ=0
0 200 400 600 800 1000ω [MeV]
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
ρπ(ω
) [a
rb.
un
its]
T = 0T = 200 MeVT = 215 MeVT = 250 MeV
0 200 400 600 800 10000
1
2
3
4
5
mπ
mπ µ = 0η
D = 1.0
Zablocki, D.B., Anglani, arXiv:0805.2687 [hep-ph]
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
13
COLOR NEUTRALITY IN THE PNJL PHASE DIAGRAM
Color neutrality constraint: µ = µ1 + µ8λ8 + iφ3λ3 ; ∂ΩMF/∂µ8 = n8 = nr + ng − 2nb = 0
Gap equations: ∂ΩMF/(∂σ, ∂∆, ∂φ3) = 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
50
100
150
200
250
With colorneutrality
T [ M
eV
]
µ [ MeV ]
Without colorneutrality
0 100 200 300 400 5000
50
100
150
200
250
0 100 200 300 400 5000
50
100
150
200
250
∆ [ M
eV
]
µ [ MeV ]
T = 0 T = 50 MeV T = 100 MeV
First order transition Second order transition Smooth crossover
2SCχSB - 2SC
EP
T [ M
eV
]
µ [ MeV ]
χSB
NQM
Gomez-Dumm, D.B., Grunfeld, Scoccola, arXiv:0807.1660
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
14
NONLOCAL POLYAKOV LOOP CHIRAL QUARK MODEL
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4T, GeV
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
md
/ mdvac
and Φ
D.B., Buballa, Radzhabov, Volkov,arXiv:0705.0384
0.18 0.19 0.20temperature T[GeV]
10
20
30
40
susc
epti
bil
itie
s
dΦ(Τ)/dTdm
u,d(T)/dT
dms(T)/dT
0.1 0.15 0.2temperature T[GeV]
Nf=2+1
w/o Polyakov loopw Polyakov loop
Nf=2+1
D.B., Horvatic, Klabucar, in prep.
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
15
COMPLEX MASS POLE FIT TO LATTICE PROPAGATOR
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0p (GeV)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
BHAGWAT, PICHOWSKY, ROBERTS,TANDY, PHYS. REV. C68 (2003)015203
S(p)−1 = i/pA(p2)+ B(p2) ,
M(p2) = B(p2)/A(p2)
Z(p2) = 1/A(p2)
S(p) sum of N pairs of complex conj. mass poles
S(p) =N
∑
i=1
1
Z2
zii/p +mi
+z∗i
i/p +m∗i
= −i/pσV (p2) + σS(p2)
Representation of the scalar amplitude
σS(p2) =
N∑
i=1
Z−12
zimi
p2 +m2i
+z∗i m
∗i
p2 +m∗i2
“Derivation” of the equivalent separable model (inFeynman-like gauge) Dµν(p− q) = δµν D(p, q) and
D(p, q) = f0(p2) f0(q
2) + f1(p2) p · q f1(q
2)
f1(p2) =
A(p2) − 1
a; f0(p
2) =B(p2) −mc
b
b2 =16
3
∫ Λ
q
[B(q2) −mc]σs(q2)
a2 =8
3
∫ Λ
q
[A(q2) − 1]q2
4σv(q
2)
HISS DUBNA, DM 2008
16