IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

8
draft-ietf-siprec-req- 06 Working Group Last Call Requirements for Media Recording using SIP Draft authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain, H. Lum IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

description

SIPREC draft-ietf-siprec-req-06 Working Group Last Call Requirements for Media Recording using SIP. IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011. Draft authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain, H. Lum. Agenda. draft-ietf-siprec-req-06 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

Page 1: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

SIPRECdraft-ietf-siprec-req-06

Working Group Last CallRequirements for

Media Recording using SIP

Draft authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain, H. Lum

IETF 79.2 Interim MeetingLeon Portman, Ken Rehor

on behalf of the team25 Jan 2011

Page 2: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

Agenda

• draft-ietf-siprec-req-06 – Proposed as Working Group Last Call

• Today: Open Issues and Public Comments– Continued and new items

• Next Steps– Items to be resolved– Publication schedule

2

Page 3: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

Discussion Items

3

Ticket Summary Disposition

62 Remove or reword REQ-015, -016 Recommend removal

-- New requirement to address multiple media streams of the same type.

Recommend adoption of suggested requirement wording.

-- Remove REQ-021 Recommend removal

Page 4: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

REQ-015, -016

“Remove REQ-15 and REQ-16. They relate to the policy mechanism or we can just to reword them to "stop" recording”

• On 2011-01-03 Partha wrote:"During the last interim meeting, it was decided to put the "forced deletion" attribute in the appdata of Metadata model instead of including in the model. Cancel and discard recording from SRC is considered as policy mechanism passing to SRS. If so, the following requirements has to be removed from SIPREC requirement:

• o REQ-015: The mechanism MUST support a means to cancel and discard the recording and associated metadata for a CS.o REQ-016: The mechanism MUST support a means to cancel and discard the recording but not the associated metadata for a CS.

• Please let me know your opinion on the same.“

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/siprec/trac/ticket/62

4

Page 5: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

New requirement

"The mechanism MUST support the ability to deliver to the SRS multiple media streams of the same media type (e.g. audio, video). For example in the case of delivering unmixed audio for each participant in the CS".

5

Page 6: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

Remove REQ-021

• REQ-021 o REQ-021 The mechanism MUST support means to relate Recording

Session(s) with Communication Session(s).

• Unneeded due to existing REQ-012, -013 o REQ-012 The mechanism MUST provide the SRS with metadata describing

CSs that are being recorded, including the media being used and the identities of parties involved.

o REQ-013 The mechanism MUST provide the SRS with the means to correlate RS media with CS participant media.

6

Page 7: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

Next Steps

• Resolve any Open Issues and Public Comments

• Publish

7

Page 8: IETF 79.2 Interim Meeting Leon Portman, Ken Rehor  on behalf of the team 25 Jan 2011

8

Discussion