IAS 32 & IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - Baker Tilly · IAS 32 & IFRS 9 Financial Instruments Baker...
Transcript of IAS 32 & IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - Baker Tilly · IAS 32 & IFRS 9 Financial Instruments Baker...
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
IAS 32 & IFRS 9
Financial Instruments
Baker Tilly in South East Europe Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
IAS 32
Financial Instruments: Presentation
Baker Tilly in South East Europe Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Objective
• IAS 32 establishes principles for presenting
financial instruments.
• It applies to classification of financial assets, financial
liabilities and equity instruments from the issuer's
perspective;
• the classification of related interest, dividends, losses
and gains; and
• the circumstances in which financial assets and
liabilities can be offset;
3
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Key concepts
• Financial instrument: A contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
• Financial asset: Any asset that is:
• cash (i.e. cash, bank deposits);
• A contractual right to receive cash or a financial asset from another entity (i.e. trade receivables, loan receivables);
• A contractual right to exchange financial instruments with another entity under potentially favourable terms (i.e. derivative asset);
• A contract that will or may be settled in an entity’s own equity instruments (i.e. convertible corporate bonds);
• An equity instrument of another entity (i.e. investment in shares).
4
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Key concepts
• Financial liability: is a contractual obligation to:
• Deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity (i.e. Bank overdraft, trade payables, loans payable, issued debt instruments (e.g. Bonds, loan notes), redeemable preference shares);
• Exchange financial instruments with another entity under potentially unfavourable terms i.e. Derivative liability);
• Be (or one that may be) settled in the entity's own equity instruments (i.e. Convertible corporate bonds).
• Equity instrument: is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities (i.e. Ordinary shares irredeemable preference shares, share options / rights).
5
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Compound Financial Instruments
• Compound instruments have both a liability and an equity component from the issuer's perspective. IAS 32 requires that the component parts, be accounted for and presented separately according to their substance based on the definitions of liability and equity. The split is made at issue date and not revised for subsequent changes.
• For example, a convertible bond contains two components. One is a financial liability, which is the issuer's contractual obligation to pay cash, and the other is an equity instrument, which is the holder's option to convert into common shares.
• When the initial carrying amount of a compound financial instrument is required to be allocated to its equity and liability components, the equity component is assigned the residual amount after deducting from the fair value of the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined for the liability component.
6
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Compound Financial Instruments
• Step 1: The fair value of the consideration in respect of the liability
component is measured at the fair value of a similar liability that
does not have any associated equity conversion option (can be
done by discounting the future cash flows at the rate prevailing in
the market for similar non-convertible obligations). This becomes
the liability component's carrying amount at initial recognition.
• Step 2: The equity component (the equity conversion option) is
the residual amount after deducting from the fair value of the
instrument as a whole the amount separately determined for the
liability component.
Equity component Total Present Value Present Value
Of Financial = Proceeds - of Liability - of Interest
Instrument
7
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Classification of financial
instruments
• The financial instrument should be classified as
either a financial liability or an equity instrument
according to the substance of the contract, not
its legal form. The entity must make the decision
at the time of initial recognition.
8
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Examples
Financial
Assets
Financial
Liabilities
Equity
Instruments
- cash and cash
equivalents;
- bank deposits;
- Loans to customers;
- accounts receivable;
- notes receivable;
- bonds purchased;
- equity instruments
of another entity;
- derivatives.
- accounts payable;
- notes payable;
- loans received;
- bonds issued;
- derivatives;
- redeemable;
preference shares.
- own ordinary
shares;
- Warrants
issued;
- share options
issued;
- share rights
issued.
9
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Interest, dividends, gains, and
losses
• Interest, dividends, gains, and losses relating to a
financial instrument classified as a liability should be
reported in the income statement. Example: Dividend
payments on redeemable preference shares (classified as liability)
would thus be classified as interest expense in the same way that
interest payments on a loan are classified as interest expense.
• On the other hand, interest, dividends, gains, and
losses relating to equity instruments are recognised
directly in equity. Example: Dividend payments on irredeemable
preference shares, ordinary shares etc., are treated as a deduction
from retained earnings in the Statement of Changes in Equity.
10
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Offsetting
• Generally, it is inappropriate to net financial assets and financial liabilities and present only net amount in the Statement of Financial Position.
• IAS 32 requires a financial asset and a financial liability to be offset and the net amount reported when and only when, an entity: • Has a legally unconditional enforceable right to set off the
amounts “A right to set-off” ; and
• Intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously “Intention to settle net or simultaneously” .
• When both conditions are met, net presentation reflects more appropriately the entity's expected future cash flows from settling the asset and the liability.
11
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
IFRS 9
Financial Instruments
Baker Tilly in South East Europe Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Current development
• On 24 July 2014, the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB) issued the final version of IFRS 9, bringing
together all three phases of the financial instruments
project:
• Phase 1: Classification and measurement of financial assets and
financial liabilities (completed 11/09 & 10/10)
• Phase 2: Impairment methodology (completed 07/14)
• Phase 3: Hedge accounting (completed 11/13)
• IFRS 9 will eventually replace IAS 39 in its entirety and is
effective for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2018, with early application permitted .
13
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Content
• IFRS 9 contains requirements for financial
assets and liabilities:
• Initial recognition
• Classification
• Initial & subsequent measurement
• Recognition of gain or loss
• Derecognition
• Impairment of a financial asset
• Accounting rules for hedging
14
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
What changes under IFRS 9
• IFRS 9 main changes compared to IAS 39
include:
• Initial recognition;
• Classification
• Initial & subsequent measurement
• Recognition of gain or loss
• Derecognition
• Impairment of a financial asset
• Accounting rules for hedging
15
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets
16
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Initial Measurement
• An entity shall recognise a Financial Asset at fair value of
consideration given plus, in the case of a financial asset not
at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are
directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset.
• FVTPL = Fair Value
FVOCI and Amortised Cost = Fair Value +
transaction costs
17
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Fair Value
Fair Value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (IFRS 13).
• The quoted price at the year end date where an active market exists (Level 1 disclosure).
• The price, adjusted if necessary, from the most recent transaction if a quoted price is not available (Level 2 disclosure).
• Price arrived at using discounted cash flow analysis or option pricing models, if an active market is not available (Level 3 disclosure).
18
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Amortised cost
• Amortised cost is the cost of an asset or liability adjusted to achieve a constant effective interest rate over the life of the asset or liability.
• The effective interest rate is the discount rate that will give a present value of future cash flows that equals the purchase price.
• The effective interest rate method determines how much interest income or expense will be reported in the income statement in each period.
19
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets - Classification and
measurement model under IAS 39
20
Financial Assets
Fair value through
profit or loss
(FVTPL)
Loans and
receivables
Held to
maturity
(HTM)
Available
for sale
(AFS)
Amortised cost Amortised cost Fair value
Note:
- Investments in unquoted equity instruments whose fair value cannot be reliably measured shall
be measured at cost
- The measurement of an asset/ liability may be adjusted because of a designated hedging
relationship.
Fair value gains and
losses are taken to
income statement
Take amortisation
charges and
impairment losses to
income statement
Take amortisation
charges and
impairment losses to
income statement
Fair value gains and
losses are taken to
equity
Fair value
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets – Classification
under IAS 39
Fair
value
through
profit or loss
(FVTPL)
►Assets that are held for trading and derivatives (except for a
derivative that is a designated hedging instrument).
► Assets are held for trading if there is frequent buying or selling
or if they were acquired for the purpose of reselling in the near
future.
►This category includes any assets designated upon initial
recognition at fair value through profit or loss (the “fair value
option”)
Loans and
receivables
►Assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not
quoted in an active market, including:
►Loans receivable
►Trade receivables
► Investments in unquoted debt instruments
►Deposits held with banks
21
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets – Classification
under IAS 39
Held to
Maturity (HTM)
► Assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity, that are quoted in an active market and the entity has the intention and ability to hold to maturity.
► e.g. Investment in quoted debt instruments such as government bonds
► If the entity sells or reclassifies any HTM investments prior to maturity, the entity is not allowed to use the HTM classification during the following 2 year period except when the sale or reclassification:
► is due to an isolated event beyond the entity’s control
► occurred less than 3 months before maturity
Available
for sale (AFS)
► Investments in debt and equity securities that do not fall into any other category e.g.
► An investment in shares that has a quoted price, and that is not held-for-trading
► An investment in an equity instrument that is not quoted, and for which there is no intention to sell
► The entity has the option to classify certain other assets into this category.
22
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets - Classification and
measurement model under IFRS 9
• The following diagram summarises the overall structure of the
classification and measurement model in IFRS 9.
• Under IFRS 9, there are 3 measurement categories:
• Amortised cost
• FVOCI (with recycling / without recycling), and
• FVTPL
• FVTPL catches all the instruments which are not measured in one
of the other categories. As opposed to IAS 39, where AFS is the
distinct residual category. In order for a financial asset to qualify for
one of the other two measurement categories, it has to pass both,
the contractual cash flow characteristics test and the business
model test.
23
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets - Classification and
measurement model under IFRS 9
24
Debt (including hybrid contracts)
Pass
No
Neither (1)
nor (2) BM with objective that
results in collecting
contractual cash flows and
selling financial assets
1 3 2
No
Yes
Derivatives
No
Yes
Amortised cost
FVTPL FVOCI
(with recycling)
FVOCI
(no recycling)
Fail
Hold-to-collect
contractual
cash flows
Conditional fair value
option (FVO) elected?
Fail Fail
Held for
trading?
Yes No
FVOCI option
elected?
‘Business model’ test (at an aggregate level)
‘Contractual cash flow characteristics’ test
(at instrument level)
Equity
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets - Classification and
measurement model under IFRS 9
25
Debt (including hybrid contracts)
Pass
No
Neither (1)
nor (2) BM with objective that
results in collecting
contractual cash flows and
selling financial assets
1 3 2
No
Yes
Derivatives
No
Yes
Amortised cost
FVTPL FVOCI
(with recycling)
FVOCI
(no recycling)
Fail
Hold-to-collect
contractual
cash flows
Conditional fair value
option (FVO) elected?
Fail Fail
Held for
trading?
Yes No
FVOCI option
elected?
‘Business model’ test (at an aggregate level)
‘Contractual cash flow characteristics’ test
(at instrument level)
Equity
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Contractual cash flow test
• The entity has to assess, whether the cash flows resulting
from the financial asset are solely payments for principal and
interest (SPPI) on specified dates. That test has to be
performed on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
• ‘Interest’ is consideration for the time value of money and the
credit risk associated with the principal amount outstanding
during a particular period of time.
• Note that derivatives and Equity instruments fail that test as
the cash flows from those instruments are not SPPI.
26
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 1
Scenario:
• Instrument A is a full recourse loan given to a customer.
• The loan facility is secured by a collateral.
Question:
Are the contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and
Interest (SPPI)?
27
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 1
Solution:
YES
The fact that a full recourse loan is collateralised does not in
itself affect the analysis of whether the contractual cash flows
are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding.
28
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 2
Scenario:
• Instrument B is a bond with a stated maturity date.
• Payments of principal and interest on the principal amount
outstanding are linked to an inflation index of the currency in
which the instrument is issued.
• The inflation link is not leveraged and the principal is protected.
Question:
Are the contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and
Interest (SPPI)?
29
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 2
Solution:
YES
Linking payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding to an unleveraged inflation index resets the
time value of money to a current level. In other words, the
interest rate on the instrument reflects ‘real’ interest. Thus, the
interest amounts are consideration for the time value of money
on the principal amount outstanding.
If however, the interest payments were indexed to another
variable such as the debtor’s performance (e.g. the debtor’s net
income) or an equity index, the test would fail the SPPI test
(unless the indexing to the debtor’s performance results in an
adjustment that only compensates the holder for changes in the
credit risk of the instrument). 30
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 3
Scenario:
• Instrument C is issued by a regulated bank and has a stated
maturity date. The instrument pays a fixed interest rate and all
contractual cash flows are non-discretionary.
• However, the issuer is subject to legislation that permits a
national resolving authority to impose losses on holders of
Instrument C in particular circumstances. For example, it has
the power to write down the par amount of Instrument C or to
convert it into a fixed number of the issuer’s ordinary shares if it
determines that the issuer is having severe financial difficulties,
needs additional regulatory capital or is ‘failing’.
Question:
Are the contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and
Interest (SPPI)? 31
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 3
Solution:
YES
The holder would analyse the contractual terms of the
financial instrument to determine whether the SPPI test is met.
The analysis would not consider the payments that arise as a
result of the national resolving authority’s power to impose
losses on the holders of Instrument C. That is because that
power, and the resulting payments, are not contractual terms of
the financial instrument.
In contrast, SPPI test would not be met if the contractual terms
of the financial instrument permit or require the issuer or
another entity to impose losses on the holder even if the
probability is remote that such a loss will be imposed.
32
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 4
Scenario:
• Instrument D is a variable interest rate instrument with a stated
maturity date that permits the borrower to choose the market
interest rate on an ongoing basis.
• For example, at each interest rate reset date, the borrower can
choose to pay three-month LIBOR for a three-month term or
one-month LIBOR for a one-month term.
Question:
Are the contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and
Interest (SPPI)?
33
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 4
Solution:
YES
The contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and
interest on the principal amount outstanding as long as the
interest paid over the life of the instrument reflects
consideration for the time value of money, for the credit risk
associated with the instrument and for other basic lending risks
and costs, as well as a profit margin.
The fact that the LIBOR interest rate is reset during the life of
the instrument does not in itself disqualify the instrument.
34
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 5
Scenario:
• Instrument E is a bond that is convertible into a fixed number of
equity instruments of the issuer.
Question:
Are the contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and
Interest (SPPI)?
35
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 5
Solution:
NO
The holder would analyse the convertible bond in its entirety.
The contractual cash flows are not payments of principal and
interest on the principal amount outstanding because they
reflect a return that is inconsistent with a basic lending
arrangement (i.e. the return is linked to the value of the equity
instrument of the issuer).
36
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 6
Scenario:
• Instrument F is a loan that pays an inverse floating interest rate
(i.e. the interest rate has an inverse relationship to market
interest rates).
Question:
Are the contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and
Interest (SPPI)?
37
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 6
Solution:
NO
The contractual cash flows are not solely payments of principal
and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
The interest amounts are not consideration for the time value of
money on the principal amount outstanding.
38
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 7
Scenario:
• Instrument G is a perpetual instrument but the issuer may call
the instrument at any point and pay the holder the par amount
plus accrued interest due.
• It pays a market interest rate but payment of interest cannot be
made unless the issuer is able to remain solvent immediately
afterwards.
• Deferred interest does not accrue additional interest.
Question:
Are the contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and
Interest (SPPI)?
39
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
SPPI Test – Example 7
Solution:
NO
The contractual cash flows are not payments of principal and
interest on the principal amount outstanding. That is because
the issuer may be required to defer interest payments and
additional interest does not accrue on those deferred interest
amounts. As a result, interest amounts are not consideration for
the time value of money on the principal amount outstanding.
If interest accrued on the deferred amounts, the contractual
cash flows could be payments of principal and interest on the
principal amount outstanding.
40
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets - Classification and
measurement model under IFRS 9
41
Debt (including hybrid contracts)
Pass
No
Neither (1)
nor (2) BM with objective that
results in collecting
contractual cash flows and
selling financial assets
1 3 2
No
Yes
Derivatives
No
Yes
Amortised cost
FVTPL FVOCI
(with recycling)
FVOCI
(no recycling)
Fail
Hold-to-collect
contractual
cash flows
Conditional fair value
option (FVO) elected?
Fail Fail
Held for
trading?
Yes No
FVOCI option
elected?
‘Business model’ test (at an aggregate level)
‘Contractual cash flow characteristics’ test
(at instrument level)
Equity
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test
• Each portfolio has to undergo the business model test.
The business model under which the portfolio is
managed results in the classification of all the financial
assets in that portfolio.
• The three possible outcomes of this test, with the
corresponding classification, are:
• Hold-to–collect contractual cash flows (CCF)
• Hold-to–collect CCF and sell
• Neither of the above two
42
Amortised cost
FVOCI
(with recycling)
FVTPL
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test
Amortised cost:
• The business model leading to amortised cost is relatively
simple. If the objective of the business model is to hold the
financial assets to collect contractual cash flows, then the
financial assets are held at amortise cost. This is similar to the
HTM category under IAS 39, but does not preclude infrequent
or insignificant sales, and there is not tainting effect on the
remainder of the AMC portfolio if some assets are sold.
• Deciding on business model test is a matter of facts, that is how
an entity actually manages its financial assets, rather than
management’s intent.
43
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 1
Scenario:
• An entity holds investments to collect their contractual cash flows. The
funding needs of the entity are predictable and the maturity of its financial
assets is matched to the entity’s estimated funding needs.
• The entity performs credit risk management activities with the objective of
minimising credit losses. In the past, sales have typically occurred when the
financial assets’ credit risk has increased such that the assets no longer
meet the credit criteria specified in the entity’s documented investment
policy. In addition, infrequent sales have occurred as a result of
unanticipated funding needs.
• Reports to key management personnel focus on the credit quality of the
financial assets and the contractual return. The entity also monitors fair
values of the financial assets, among other information.
Question:
How shall the above portfolio be classified?
44
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 1
Solution:
Amortised Cost
Although the entity considers, among other information, the financial assets’
fair values from a liquidity perspective (i.e. the cash amount that would be
realised if the entity needs to sell assets), the entity’s objective is to hold the
financial assets in order to collect the contractual cash flows.
Sales would not contradict that objective if they were in response to an
increase in the assets’ credit risk, for example if the assets no longer meet
the credit criteria specified in the entity’s documented investment policy.
Infrequent sales resulting from unanticipated funding needs (e.g. in a stress
case scenario) also would not contradict that objective, even if such sales
are significant in value.
45
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 2
Scenario:
• An entity’s business model is to purchase portfolios of financial assets, such
as loans. Those portfolios may or may not include financial assets that are
credit impaired.
• If payment on the loans is not made on a timely basis, the entity attempts to
realise the contractual cash flows through various means - for example, by
contacting the debtor by mail, telephone or other methods. The entity’s
objective is to collect the contractual cash flows and the entity does not
manage any of the loans in this portfolio with an objective of realising cash
flows by selling them.
• In some cases, the entity enters into interest rate swaps to change the
interest rate on particular financial assets in a portfolio from a floating
interest rate to a fixed interest rate.
Question:
How shall the above portfolio be classified?
46
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 2
Solution:
Amortised Cost
The objective of the entity’s business model is to hold the financial assets in
order to collect the contractual cash flows.
The same analysis would apply even if the entity does not expect to receive
all of the contractual cash flows (e.g. some of the financial assets are credit
impaired at initial recognition).
Moreover, the fact that the entity enters into derivatives to modify the cash
flows of the portfolio does not in itself change the entity’s business model.
47
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 3
Scenario:
• An entity has a business model with the objective of originating loans to
customers and subsequently selling those loans to a securitisation vehicle.
• The securitisation vehicle issues instruments to investors.
• The originating entity controls the securitisation vehicle and thus
consolidates it.
• The securitisation vehicle collects the contractual cash flows from the loans
and passes them on to its investors.
• It is assumed for the purposes of this example that the loans continue to be
recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position because they
are not derecognised by the securitisation vehicle.
Question:
How shall the above portfolio be classified on a group level?
48
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 3
Solution:
Amortised Cost
The consolidated group originated the loans with the objective of holding
them to collect the contractual cash flows.
However, the originating entity has an objective of realising cash flows on
the loan portfolio by selling the loans to the securitisation vehicle, so for the
purposes of its separate financial statements it would not be considered to
be managing this portfolio in order to collect the contractual cash flows.
49
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 4
Scenario:
• A financial institution holds financial assets to meet liquidity needs in a
‘stress case’ scenario (e.g., a run on the bank’s deposits). The entity does
not anticipate selling these assets except in such scenarios.
• The entity monitors the credit quality of the financial assets and its objective
in managing the financial assets is to collect the contractual cash flows. The
entity evaluates the performance of the assets on the basis of interest
revenue earned and credit losses realised.
• However, the entity also monitors the fair value of the financial assets from a
liquidity perspective to ensure that the cash amount that would be realised if
the entity needed to sell the assets in a stress case scenario would be
sufficient to meet the entity’s liquidity needs. Periodically, the entity makes
sales that are insignificant in value to demonstrate liquidity.
Question:
How shall the above portfolio be classified?
50
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 4
Solution:
Amortised Cost (The objective of the entity’s business model is to hold the
financial assets to collect contractual cash flows).
The analysis would not change even if during a previous stress case
scenario the entity had sales that were significant in value in order to meet
its liquidity needs. Similarly, recurring sales activity that is insignificant in
value is not inconsistent with holding financial assets to collect contractual
cash flows.
In contrast, if an entity holds financial assets to meet its everyday liquidity needs
and meeting that objective involves frequent sales that are significant in value,
the objective of the entity’s business model is not to hold the financial assets to
collect contractual cash flows.
Similarly, if the entity is required by its regulator to routinely sell financial assets
to demonstrate that the assets are liquid, and the value of the assets sold is
significant, the entity’s business model is not solely to hold financial assets to
collect contractual cash flows. Whether a third party imposes the requirement to
sell, or that activity is at the entity’s discretion, is not relevant to the analysis.
51
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test
FVOCI:
• The IASB introduced FVOCI as a measurement category in
order to overcome cases where the business model objective is
achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling
financial assets. For example, a bank holds a portfolio as a
liquidity buffer as required by the regulator (i.e. Central Bank).
That portfolio consists of plain-vanilla bonds which are intended
to be held until maturity. However, the regulator also requires
the bank to churn that portfolio on an annual basis to
demonstrate that the assets are in fact liquid. Such a portfolio
could not qualify for AMC (see example 4).
52
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test
FVOCI:
• In this category, fair value changes are recognised in OCI while
interest income and possible impairment are recognised
through P&L as if the asset were recorded at AMC. This means
that on initial recognition, a 12-month expected loss will need to
be recorded in profit or loss with an offsetting credit to OCI.
Changes in fair value for reasons other than credit (e.g. a
liquidity discount) will not be recorded in profit or loss until
derecognition. The amounts accumulated in OCI are recycled
to P&L on sale.
• The assessment of the business model is performed on a
portfolio level.
53
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 5
Scenario:
• An entity anticipates capital expenditure in a few years. The entity invests its
excess cash in short and long-term financial assets so that it can fund the
expenditure when the need arises. Many of the financial assets have
contractual lives that exceed the entity’s anticipated investment period.
• The entity will hold financial assets to collect the contractual cash flows and,
when an opportunity arises, it will sell financial assets to re-invest the cash in
financial assets with a higher return.
• The managers responsible for the portfolio are remunerated based on the
overall return generated by the portfolio.
Question:
How shall the above portfolio be classified?
54
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 5
Solution:
Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI).
The objective of the business model is achieved by both collecting
contractual cash flows and selling financial assets. The entity will make
decisions on an ongoing basis about whether collecting contractual cash
flows or selling financial assets will maximise the return on the portfolio until
the need arises for the invested cash.
In contrast, consider an entity that anticipates a cash outflow in five years to
fund capital expenditure and invests excess cash in short-term financial
assets. When the investments mature, the entity reinvests the cash in new
short-term financial assets. The entity maintains this strategy until the funds
are needed, at which time the entity uses the proceeds from the maturing
financial assets to fund the capital expenditure. Only sales that are
insignificant in value occur before maturity (unless there is an increase in
credit risk). The objective of this contrasting business model is to hold
financial assets to collect contractual cash flows.
55
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 6
Scenario:
• A financial institution holds financial assets to meet its everyday liquidity
needs. The entity seeks to minimise the costs of managing those liquidity
needs and therefore actively manages the return on the portfolio. That return
consists of collecting contractual payments as well as gains and losses from
the sale of financial assets.
• As a result, the entity holds financial assets to collect contractual cash flows
and sells financial assets to reinvest in higher yielding financial assets or to
better match the duration of its liabilities. In the past, this strategy has
resulted in frequent sales activity and such sales have been significant in
value. This activity is expected to continue in the future.
Question:
How shall the above portfolio be classified?
56
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 6
Solution:
Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI).
The objective of the business model is to maximise the return on the
portfolio to meet everyday liquidity needs and the entity achieves that
objective by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial
assets. In other words, both collecting contractual cash flows and selling
financial assets are integral to achieving the business model’s objective.
57
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 7
Scenario:
• An insurer holds financial assets in order to fund insurance contract
liabilities. The insurer uses the proceeds from the contractual cash flows on
the financial assets to settle insurance contract liabilities as they come due.
To ensure that the contractual cash flows from the financial assets are
sufficient to settle those liabilities, the insurer undertakes significant buying
and selling activity on a regular basis to rebalance its portfolio of assets and
to meet cash flow needs as they arise.
Question:
How shall the above portfolio be classified?
58
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test – Example 7
Solution:
Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI).
The objective of the business model is to fund the insurance contract
liabilities. To achieve this objective, the entity collects contractual cash flows
as they come due and sells financial assets to maintain the desired profile of
the asset portfolio. Thus both collecting contractual cash flows and selling
financial assets are integral to achieving the business model’s objective.
59
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test
FVTPL:
• The rest of the financial assets go into the FVTPL category.
Also, derivatives and instruments held for trading are
mandatorily in this category.
60
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Business model test
FVTPL:
• One business model that results in measurement at fair value through profit
or loss is one in which an entity manages the financial assets with the
objective of realising cash flows through the sale of the assets. The entity
makes decisions based on the assets’ fair values and manages the assets to
realise those fair values. In this case, the entity’s objective will typically result
in active buying and selling.
• Even though the entity will collect contractual cash flows while it holds the
financial assets, the objective of such a business model is not achieved by
both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets. This is
because the collection of contractual cash flows is not integral to achieving
the business model’s objective; instead, it is incidental to it.
61
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets - Classification and
measurement model under IFRS 9
62
Debt (including hybrid contracts)
Pass
No
Neither (1)
nor (2) BM with objective that
results in collecting
contractual cash flows and
selling financial assets
1 3 2
No
Yes
Derivatives
No
Yes
Amortised cost
FVTPL FVOCI
(with recycling)
FVOCI
(no recycling)
Fail
Hold-to-collect
contractual
cash flows
Conditional fair value
option (FVO) elected?
Fail Fail
Held for
trading?
Yes No
FVOCI option
elected?
‘Business model’ test (at an aggregate level)
‘Contractual cash flow characteristics’ test
(at instrument level)
Equity
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Conditional fair value option
• Conditional fair value option means that an asset which would
otherwise be measured at Amortised Cost or FVOCI can be
designated, at initial recognition only, to be measured at FVTPL
if this eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or
recognition inconsistency (‘accounting mismatch’) that would
otherwise arise from measuring any assets or liabilities and
recognising any gains or losses on them on different bases.
For example, an entity holds a fixed-rate loan receivable that it hedges with
an interest rate swap. Measuring the loan asset at amortised cost and the
interest rate swap at FVTPL, creates a measurement mismatch. In this case,
the loan receivable could be designated at FVTPL under the Fair Value
Option.
63
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Assets - Classification and
measurement model under IFRS 9
64
Debt (including hybrid contracts)
Pass
No
Neither (1)
nor (2) BM with objective that
results in collecting
contractual cash flows and
selling financial assets
1 3 2
No
Yes
Derivatives
No
Yes
Amortised cost
FVTPL FVOCI
(with recycling)
FVOCI
(no recycling)
Fail
Hold-to-collect
contractual
cash flows
Conditional fair value
option (FVO) elected?
Fail Fail
Held for
trading?
Yes No
FVOCI option
elected?
‘Business model’ test (at an aggregate level)
‘Contractual cash flow characteristics’ test
(at instrument level)
Equity
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Equity investments
• Equity investments (i.e. investments in shares) can only be measured at Fair Value since contractual cash flow on specified dates is not a characteristic of equity instruments. Thus FVTPL classification is used.
• If however, an equity investment is not held for trading, the entity has the irrevocable option, at initial recognition only, to classify it at FVOCI, with only dividend income recognised in I/S. Such designation is done on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
• This sounds similar to the AFS category for equity instruments under IAS 39 but with the differences that the amounts in OCI never get recycled to P&L (on disposal it is reclassified in equity (R/E)). Consequently, no impairment testing is required.
65
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Reclassification of Financial Assets
between AMC & FVTPL
• Reclassification is required when, and only when, an entity changes its business model for managing them.
• Any reclassification is to be accounted for prospectively from the Reclassification date:
• Which is the first day of the first reporting period following the change in business model that results in an entity reclassifying financial assets
• Reclassification from amortised cost to fair value measure instrument at fair value on that date; recognise difference between carrying amount and fair value in a separate line in profit or loss
• Reclassification from fair value to amortised cost fair value of the instrument on the date of reclassification becomes its new carrying amount
• Detailed disclosures will be required in interim reports and annual financial statements
• Reclassification not allowed where:
• The FVOCI option has been exercised, or
• The ‘Fair Value option’ has been exercised.
66
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Liabilities
67
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Initial Measurement
• An entity shall recognise a Financial Liability at fair value
of consideration received minus, in the case of a financial
liability at amortised cost, transaction costs that are directly
attributable to the issue of the financial liability.
• FVTPL = Fair Value
Amortised Cost = Fair Value - transaction costs
68
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Liabilities - Classification
and measurement model under IAS 39
69
Financial Liabilities
Fair Value through profit or loss
(FVTPL) All other liabilities
Fair
value Amortised
cost
Fair value
gains and losses are
taken to the income statement
Take amortisation
charges and impairment
losses to the income statement
Note:
- The measurement of an asset/ liability may be adjusted because of a designated hedging
relationship.
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Liabilities - Classification
under IAS 39
70
Fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)
►Liabilities that are held for trading and derivatives (except for a derivative that is a designated hedging instrument).
► e.g. an issued debt instrument that the entity intends to repurchase soon to make a gain from short-term movement in interest rates.
►This category includes any liabilities designated upon initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss (the “fair value option”)
Other liabilities - Amortised cost
►This is the default category for financial liabilities that do not meet the definition of financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. For many companies, most financial liabilities will fall into this category. e.g. accounts payable, loan payable, issued debt instruments (e.g. redeemable preference shares), deposits from customers
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Liabilities - Classification
and measurement model under IFRS 9
• Financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost, unless
they are required or elected (fair value option) to be measured
at FVTPL.
• Required
• Financial liabilities held for trading
• Derivatives
• Elected (‘Fair Value Option’)
This designation can only be made upon initial recognition and is
irrevocable. Criteria for exercising the fair value option include:
• the liability is managed on a fair value basis
• electing fair value will eliminate or reduce an accounting mismatch or
• the instrument is a hybrid that would require separation of an embedded
derivative.
71
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Liabilities - Classification
and measurement model under IFRS 9
Where an entity opts the fair value option, any change in fair
value of the liability must be separated into two elements as
follows:
• Changes in fair value due to own credit risk, which are taken
to other comprehensive income (not recycled).
• Other changes in fair value, which are taken to profit or loss.
One possible approach is to separate the interest rate charged
on the financial liability into a benchmark rate (e.g. such as
LIBOR) and an instrument-specific rate. Any change in fair
value which is not wholly due to the change in LIBOR is a
change in own credit risk.
72
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial Liabilities - Classification
and measurement model under IFRS 9
73
Amortised cost
• Financial Liabilities not held for trading
FVTPL
• Derivatives
• Liabilities held for trading
• Fair value option
FVOCI
(No recycling)
Note:
Reclassification is
not allowed!!!
Financial Liabilities
Changes in fair
value due to own
credit risk
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Own credit risk - Example
On 1 January 20X8 ABC issues a 7 year bond at par value of
$300,000 and annual fixed coupon rate of 9%, which is also the
market rate, when LIBOR is 6%. Therefore the instrument-specific
element of IRR = (9% - 6%) is 3%.
At 31 December 20X8, LIBOR has moved to 5.5%, thus making the
benchmark interest rate (5.5% + 3%) 8.5% (i.e. LIBOR plus the
instrument-specific element of IRR). If the fair value of the liability is
consistent with a market interest rate of, say, 8.3%, then any change
in the fair value of the liability from the benchmark rate to fair value
must be due to something other than the change in the benchmark
rate – i.e. it must be due to the change in the liability’s credit risk.
Required:
Calculate the amounts to be included within the financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 20X8.
74
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Own credit risk - Solution
PV at benchmark rate 8.5% Cash flow Factor PV
Year $ $
1-6 27,000 4.5533 122,939
6 300,000 0.6129 183,870
306,809
PV at market rate 8.3% Cash flow Factor PV
Year $ $
1-6 27,000 4.5808 123,684
6 300,000 0.6197 185,910
309,594
75
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Own credit risk - Solution
Therefore, the change in the fair value of the liability which
is not due to the change in the benchmark rate must be due
to the change in the liability’s credit risk.
$
PV of liability at market rate of 8.3%
(on SOFP at reporting date) 309,594
PV of liability at benchmark rate of 8.5% 306,809
Other comprehensive income ‘ 2,785
76
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Impairment of financial instruments
77
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Impairment of financial instruments
under IAS39
• All financial assets, except for those measured at FVTPL, are subject to an impairment review.
• IAS 39 requires that an assessment should be made, at each reporting date, as to whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset is impaired, (i.e. whether a loss event has occurred that has had a negative impact on the expected future cash flows of the asset).
• The loss event causing the negative impact must have already happened. An event expected to cause impairment in the future should not be anticipated (incurred loss model).
• The treatment of any impairment loss differs according to the type of financial asset.
78
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial assets carried at amortised cost
• Impairment loss = Carrying Value – PV of the estimated future cash flows of the asset, discounted at the original effective interest rate (not the current market interest rate).
• Any impairment loss is recognised as an expense in profit or loss.
• Interest on impaired assets is accrued at the original effective interest rate.
79
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial assets carried at cost
• Unquoted equity investments that cannot be reliably measured at fair value are included in the statement of financial position at cost.
• Impairment loss = Carrying Value - PV of estimated future cash flows of the asset, discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar financial asset.
• Any impairment loss is recognised as an expense in profit or loss.
80
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Financial assets carried at FVOCI
• If the fair value of a financial asset has been
recognised in other comprehensive income
(FVOCI) and there is evidence that the asset is
impaired, the cumulative loss that had been
recognised as other comprehensive income
must be removed from equity and recognised as
an expense in profit or loss, even though the
asset has not been derecognised.
81
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Objective of IFRS 9 impairment model
• The objective of the impairment requirements is that at
each reporting date, an entity shall measure and
recognise the loss allowance at an amount equal to the
lifetime expected credit losses of all financial
instruments for which there have been significant
increases in credit risk since initial recognition.
• An entity shall recognise in profit or loss, as an
impairment gain or loss, the amount of expected credit
losses (or reversal).
82
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Variation of the expected credit loss
model
83
Scope of ECL requirements General approach
Simplified approach
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
Trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component Trade receivables that contain a significant financing component
Policy election at entity level
Other debt financial assets measured at AMC or at FVOCI Loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts not accounted for at FVTPL IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Contract assets that do not contain a significant financing component Contract assets that contain a significant financing component
Policy election at entity level
IAS 17 Leases
Lease receivables Policy election at entity level
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
General Approach
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Loss allowance updated at each reporting date
12-month expected credit losses
Lifetime expected credit losses
Lifetime expected credit losses
Lifetime expected credit losses criterion
When and how
As soon as a financial asset is originated or purchased, 12-month expected credit losses are recognised in profit or loss and a loss allowance is established.
If the credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition, full lifetime expected credit losses are recognised.
The resulting credit quality is not considered to be low credit risk.
If the credit risk of a financial asset increases to the point that it is considered credit-impaired.
Interest revenue Interest revenue is calculated using the effective interest rate on the gross carrying amount (without adjustment for expected credit losses).
Interest revenue is calculated using the effective interest rate on amortised cost (gross carrying amount adjusted for the loss allowance)
Change in credit risk since initial recognition
Improvement Deterioration
Start here
30 DPD 90 DPD
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
General Approach
• As a general approach, expected credit losses are required to
be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to:
• the 12-month expected credit losses (expected credit losses that
result from default events on financial instrument that are possible
within 12 months after the reporting date); or
• Full lifetime expected credit losses (expected credit losses that result
from all possible default events over the expected life of the financial
instrument).
• A loss allowance for full lifetime expected credit losses is
required for a financial instrument if the credit risk of that
financial instrument has increased significantly since initial
recognition.
• Definition of ‘default’ is not defined by the standard and there is
a 90 days past due rebuttable presumption.
85
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Lifetime and 12-month
Expected Credit Losses
• ECL are expected shortfalls in the contractual cash flows.
• Lifetime ECL reflect the expected shortfalls over the entire life of a financial instrument i.e. in assessing credit risk, the entity considers the likelihood of not collecting some or all of the contractual cash flows over the remaining maturity of the financial instrument (i.e. the probability of a default occurring over the remaining life).
• 12 month ECL are the lifetime losses that would arise on an asset weighted by the probability of a default occurring in the next 12 months. It isn’t just expected cash shortfalls in the next 12 months or the losses on those assets that are expected to default in the next 12 months.
86
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Assessing significant increases in
credit risk
• An entity, at each reporting date, should compare:
• The risk of a default occurring as at the reporting date, with
• The risk of a default occurring as at the date of initial recognition.
• Generally a financial instrument would have a significant increase
in credit risk before there is objective evidence of impairment and
before default occurs.
• There is a rebuttable presumption that:
• The credit risk on a financial asset has increased significantly since
initial recognition when contractual payments are 30 dpd or more.
• Default does not occur later than when a financial asset is 90 dpd.
• If reasonable and supportable forward-looking information is
available without undue cost or effort, an entity cannot rely solely
on past due information.
87
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Operational simplifications in assessing
significant increases in credit risk
88
Low credit risk
For financial instruments that are equivalent to ‘investment grade’
quality, an entity would continue to recognise 12-month ECL
More than 30 days past due (DPD)
Rebuttable presumption that there is a significant increase in credit
risk when contractual payments are more than 30 DPD
► An entity can assume that a financial instrument has not significantly increased in credit risk if it has low credit risk at the reporting date
► The low credit risk notion is not a bright-line trigger and that financial instruments are not required to be externally rated
► The more than 30 DPD rebuttable presumption is intended to serve as a backstop and should identify significant increases in credit risk before default or objective evidence of impairment.
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Low vs high credit risk financial
instruments: how would the model work?
89
Probabilities of default (PD) are based on S&P Global Corporate Average Cumulative Default Rates By Rating Modifier (1981-2011)
Threshold Investment grade Non-investment grade
S&P AA+ A BBB+ BBB- BB B+ B B- CCC/C D
12-mth PD* 0% 0.08% 0.15% 0.37% 0.76% 2.50% 5.46% 8.64% 26.82% 100%
Allowance 12-month 12-month or lifetime
Implementation challenges
► Tracking credit risk measures from origination
► Developing practical ‘absolute’ credit risk thresholds
► Mapping internal grading to external rating and/or probabilities of default (PD)
► Using delinquency-based approaches and the ‘more than 30 DPD’ rebuttable presumption
► Segmenting the portfolios by shared risk characteristics
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Measuring expected credit losses
• An entity shall measure expected credit losses of a
financial instrument in a way that reflects:
• An unbiased and probability-weighted amount that is determined
by evaluating a range of possible outcomes (calculation
incorporates Probabilities of Default – PDs);
• The time value of money (present value of all cash shortfalls). A
cash shortfall is the difference between the contractual cash flows
that are due to an entity and the cash flows that the entity expects
to receive. Note that a credit loss arises even if the entity expects
to be paid in full but at a later stage than when contractually due.;
• Reasonable and supportable information that is available without
undue cost or effort at the reporting date about past events,
current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.
90
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Measuring expected credit losses:
Implementation Challenges
91
The time value of money
► Choice of discount rate
Best available information
Past Current
Future
► Area of
judgement
► Availability of data
► Reliability of forecasts
+ +
Unbiased and probability-weighted estimate
► No prescribed approaches ► Not best estimate
► Defining default
► Determining 12-month and lifetime ECL
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Illustrative example: PD approach
► Correlating PD and LGD ► Relying on rating agencies’ data ► Individual vs collective assessment
Challenges
0.15% x 25% x $1 m = $375
► Loan originated at $1 million, i.e., exposure at default (EAD)
► 25% gross carrying amount irrecoverable if loan defaults, i.e., loss given default (LGD)
► 0.15% probability of a default (PD) in next 12 months
12-month ECL
allowance
PD x LGD x EAD
92
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Gross carrying amount
Lifetime expected credit loss allowance (gross carrying amount x lifetime expected credit loss rate)
Current
15,000,000 @ 0,3% =
45,000
1-30 days past due
7,500,000 @ 1,6% =
120,000
31-60 days past due
4,000,000 @ 3,6% =
144,000
61-90 days past due
2,500,000 @ 6,6% =
165,000
>90 days past due
1,000,000 @ 10,6% =
106,000
30,000,000
580,000
Illustrative example: Provision Matrix
Trade receivables from the large number of small customers amount to $30 million divided into groups with common risk characteristics.
Current
1-30 days past due
31-60 days past due
61-90 days past due
> 90 days past due
Probability of Default
0.3% 1.6% 3.6% 6.6% 10.6%
93
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Simplified approach and purchased
or originated credit-impaired assets
94
Simplified approach
Purchased or originated credit-impaired assets
► Scope: financial assets that are credit-impaired on purchase or origination
► ECL on initial recognition reflected in credit-adjusted EIR (no ‘day one’ 12-month ECL) Loss allowance based on subsequent changes in lifetime ECL
► Scope: trade receivables, contract assets under IFRS 15 and lease receivables under IAS 17
► Loss allowance based on lifetime ECL (Stage 1 is omitted)
► No tracking of changes in credit risk
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Measuring expected credit losses
95
Expected credit losses
Present value of all cash shortfalls over the
remaining life, discounted at the
original EIR
Numerator: Cash shortfalls
► The period over which to estimate ECL: maximum contractual period (for revolving credit facilities, this extends beyond contractual period)
► Probability-weighted outcomes: possibility that a credit loss occurs, no matter how low that possibility is
► Reasonable and supportable information: reasonably available information about the past, current and future forecasts
Denominator: Discount rate
► Discounting period: from cash flows date to reporting date
► Assets: EIR or approximate (if credit-impaired on initial recognition, then use credit-adjusted EIR)
► Commitments and guarantees: EIR of resulting asset (if not determinable, then use current rate representing risk of the cash flows)
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Deterioration in credit quality (stage 2)
• Initially an asset is assessed for impairment based on
12-month expected credit losses.
• If there is a deterioration in credit quality from initial
recognition, then it is assessed for impairment on lifetime
expected credit losses. \
• Interest income is calculated on the gross carrying
amount (the amount before deducting the allowance
balance) until there is a significant deterioration in credit
risk, when it is calculated on the net carrying amount.
96
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Deterioration in credit quality (stage 3)
• If the asset deteriorates to the point that it is essentially non-performing (i.e. there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset), interest is calculated by applying the effective interest rate to the carrying amount net of the allowance balance to better reflect the yield on the asset.
• The point where this occurs is when an incurred loss would arise under IAS 39 (i.e. when there is objective evidence of impairment) using that concept in IAS 39.
97
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Impairment Indicators
Indicators that credit risk has increased significantly may include:
• Significant adverse changes in the expected performance and behaviour of the borrower;
• An actual or expected internal credit rating downgrade for the borrower;
• Existing or forecast adverse changes in business, financial or economic conditions that are expected to cause a significant change in the borrower’s ability to meet its debt obligations, such as an actual or expected increase in interest rates or in unemployment rates;
• An actual or expected significant change in the operating results of the borrower. Examples include actual or expected declining revenues or margins, increasing operating risks, working capital deficiencies, decreasing asset quality, increased balance sheet leverage, etc;
• Significant increases in credit risk on other financial instruments of the same borrower;
• An actual or expected significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic, or technological environment of the borrower that results in a significant change in the borrower’s ability to meet its debt obligations;
• Significant changes, such as reductions in financial support from a parent entity or other affiliate.
98
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Uncollectability (write-off)
• An entity would write off a financial asset, or part of a
financial asset, in the period in which the entity has no
reasonable expectation of recovery of the financial asset
(or part of the financial asset)
• The gross carrying amount of a financial asset would be
reduced as a result of the write-off
• A write-off constitutes a derecognition event
99
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Reversal of impairment losses
• If an entity has measured the loss allowance for a
financial instrument at an amount equal to lifetime
expected credit losses in the previous reporting period,
but determines at the current reporting date that
condition about ‘significant increase of credit risk since
initial recognition’ is no longer met, the entity shall
measure the loss allowance at an amount equal to 12-
month expected credit losses at the current reporting
date.
• Any impairment loss reversal is recognised in the Profit
or Loss.
100
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Transition and effective date
• IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2018, with early application permitted
• Retrospective application with transition reliefs permitted
101
► Approximated based on reasonable and supportable information available without undue cost or effort
► May apply low credit risk or more than 30 days past due
► If undeterminable, recognise lifetime expected credit losses
► Restatement of prior periods not required (permitted to do so unless this requires the use of hindsight)
► Cumulative impairment loss allowance is recognised in the opening retained earnings
The same transition reliefs apply for first-time adopters
Comparatives
Initial credit risk
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
How will IFRS 9 impact entities?
► Greater judgement and diversity of application ► Estimating ECL
► Assessing when lifetime ECL are required
► Likely to result in earlier recognition of credit losses ► May increase the credit loss allowance depending on:
► Duration and quality of financial instruments
► Application of the current IAS 39 model
► Potential volatility due to change in estimates ► ‘Cliff effect’ when financial instruments move between 12-
month ECL and lifetime ECL and vice versa
► Modification of current credit risk management and financial reporting systems
102
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Contact us:
Marios E. Maltezos Senior Manager
Technical Advisory Services
Baker Tilly in South East Europe
Tel. +357 22 458 500, Fax. +357 22 751 648
Email: [email protected]
This presentation has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. Do not act upon the
information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the
accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication. Τo the extent permitted by law, Baker Tilly Klitou and Partners Ltd (Baker Tilly in
Cyprus), its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of anyone acting, or
refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
©2017 Baker Tilly in Cyprus. All rights reserved. Baker Tilly in Cyprus is an independent member of Baker Tilly International. Baker Tilly International Limited is
an English company. Baker Tilly International provides no professional services to clients. Each member firm is a separate and independent legal entity and
each describes itself as such. Baker Tilly in Cyprus is not Baker Tilly International’s agent and does not have the authority to bind Baker Tilly International or
act on Baker Tilly International’s behalf. None of Baker Tilly International, Baker Tilly in Cyprus, nor any of the other member firms of Baker Tilly International
has any liability for each other’s acts or omissions. The name Baker Tilly and its associated logo is used under licence from Baker Tilly International Limited.
CYPRUS www.bakertillyklitou.com
Marios E. Maltezos FCCA, ACIB
Our Experts’ CVs
Senior Manager, Technical Advisory Services Baker Tilly in South East Europe
Competencies
• Extensive experience in IFRSs
• IFRS implementation practitioner
• 14-year experience in IFRS training and seminars
Relevant project experience (12 years)
• Implementation of IFRSs in Financial sector
• Evaluation of provisioning methodology and implementation of IAS39 and IFRS9 requirements to Banks
• In-house and open public IFRS training in Europe and Middle East
Experience
Marios has a long experience in the Banking and
Professional services sectors. He specialises in providing
high quality IFRS advisory services and training to both
large and medium sized clients of Baker Tilly in South
East Europe. He is a Senior Manager heading the
Technical Advisory Services of the firm and his clients are
engaged in a range of sectors including manufacturing,
trading, professional services and financial services.
Prior to joining Baker Tilly in SEE, Marios worked for 20
years in a leading financial institution in Cyprus, serving
the organisation from the positions of Group Senior
Accountant and Group Senior Internal Auditor. He is also a
lecturer for various ACCA examinations.
Marios has delivered repeatedly IFRS courses and
seminars to more than fifteen different countries in Europe
and Middle East during the past 14 years.