I m p a c t Euronatur Conference Bonn, Sept 7th, 2005 impact | policy consulting simone lughofer...
-
Upload
audrey-golden -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of I m p a c t Euronatur Conference Bonn, Sept 7th, 2005 impact | policy consulting simone lughofer...
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Achieving Sustainable Rural Development through
Partnership
Experiences & Lessons Learned
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Defining Art.6 „Partnership“:Levels of Participation
Level 1: Information (provision of information, public relations, „hearing“)
Level 2: Consultation (feedback, dialogue, „round table“)
Level 3: Co-operation (preparation of decisions up to co-decision)
Partnership: placed between levels 2 and 3 Depending on institutional and financial responsibilities … of all partners > information
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Participation within Rural Development:
Advantages (in Theory)
Advantages: Result has higher (political) legitimacy and tax-payers
acceptance Improvement of programme: Reflection of ecological and
social aspects, higher innovation potential Objectification: Interests instead of positions, mutual
learning, conflict settlement through dialogue More engagement in implementation, longterm sustainable
solutions facilitated by stakeholder acceptance
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Participation within RD:Disadvantages (expected)
Disadvantages:
Loss of control over final decision
Costs of the process (time and money)
Opportunity costs for NGOs (environmental as well as agricultural) -> participation trap?
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
First Experiences in Austria:AE Advisory Committee
Members: regional agriculture and nature conservation authorities, NGOs, (federal environment ministry), chair: ministry of agriculture-> forum of experts, not politicians -> Objectification
Tasks: Evaluation of AE programme, integration of results into programme development, allocation of budget for studies-> Improvement of programme by complementing agriculture targets through the social and environmental perspecitve, prevention of (public) criticism
Standing orders: votes by majority, recommendations to the agri minister, formal protocols known to DG Environment-> high influence, ongoing dispute-settlement
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Participation within the Preparation of the Austrian RD
Plan: LE 07-13 Elaboration of RD Plan as participatory project, lead and final
responsibility with ministry of agriculture (& environment) Core: 7 (+4) working groups, reflecting the 3 RD axis,
from end 2004 – end 2005 Members: authorities (federal ministry, regional agriculture and
nature conservation authorities), agriculture chamber, partly chamber of commerce, partly organic farmers representatives; around 150 experts
3-4 conferences (Kick-Off Nov. 04, Mai 05, 1-2 further conferences planned, e.g. to the national strategy plan)
Internet-platform, opportunity to post and publish contributionswww.le07-13.lebensministerium.at
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Preparation of the Austrian RD Plan: Lessons Learned
Clear responsibilites: esp. SPC for internal and external needs
Connection between technical and political level: bad connection can slow down the whole process, mutual loyality
Clear definition of roles: final decision lies with the minister
Planning of process: example LEADER, broad kick-off, followed by various participation instruments
Diversity of needs: needs to be reflected through different instruments and intensities of participation
Provision of information: extensive; adequate resources need to be allocated! (protocols to detailled, reports to far advanced)
Cross-axis consistency: Matrix-WGs (z.B. nature conservation, forestry), co-ordination between heads of working groups
Euronatur ConferenceBonn, Sept 7th, 2005
impact | policy consultingsimone lughofer
i m p a c t
Conclusion: „Proactive Approach to Partizipation“
Structured process instead of singular interventions:better control and budgetary planning
Transparency: change of ministerial culture necessary, needs strong high-level commitment
Good opportunity for integrated consideration of funding measures (whilest seperate in implementation)
Broad agricultural debate on high level:WGs with 150 experts -> Capacity building and better mutual understanding between actors as side-effect
Open issue: Resources for NGO-participation, particularly with view on the monitoring committees