I ' I EXECUTING AGENCY: I 95/pd 1-95-1 rev 4 (M) e.… · I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I)...

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

'"

Government of.lndonesia

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

SERIAL NUMBER: PD 1/95 Rev. 4 (M)

EXECUTING AGENCY: Indonesian Ecolabeling Institute

HOST GOVERNMENT: Indonesia

STARTING DATE: The agreement was signed February 6, 1998

First payment received March 13, 1998

TOTAL DURATION: 24 months

IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: 24 months

PROJECT COSTS: $ 658,744.53 (USD)


~ . .. u.. . Government of.lndonesia

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

SERIAL NUMBER: PD 1/95 Rev. 4 (M)

EXECUTING AGENCY: Indonesian Ecolabeling Institute

HOST GOVERNMENT: Indonesia

STARTING DATE: The agreement was signed February 6, 1998

First payment received March 13, 1998

TOTAL DURATION: 24 months

IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: 24 months

PROJECT COSTS: $ 658,744.53 (USD)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I)

./' /

CONTENTS

PART I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Original Project Formulation

2. Project Achievements

Output 1.1 Improved Data Collection and Field Analysis Method

Output 1.2 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Professionals in the Certification of SFM

Output 1.3. Improve the Capability of Assessor Institutions and Individuals

Output 1.4 Establishment of the Personnel Registration Body (PRB) system

Output 2.1 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Potential Expert Panels

Output 2.2 Strengthening of Expertise in the Decision-Making Panel for the SFM Assessment

Output 2.3 Increase the Availability of Independent and Reliable Information on SFM

Output 2.4 Improvement of Knowledge and Awareness of SFM for

the Stakeholder

Output 2.5 Improvement of SFM and Forest Certification Network

Output 2.6 Establishment of Independent Training Institution

3. Target Beneficiaries Involvement

1. Government

2. Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)

3. Assessors and Experts Panel

4. Lessons Learned

4.1 Development lessons

4.1.1 Project Design

4.1.1.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System

4.1.1.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel

4.1.1.3 Strengthening of Institutional Capacity

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

5

6

6

6

7

7

8

8

8

8

8

8

9

9

10

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I)

./' /

CONTENTS

PART EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Original Project Formulation

2. Project Achievements

Output 1.1 Improved Data Collection and Field Analysis Method

Output 1.2 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Professionals in the Certification of SFM

Output 1.3. Improve the Capability of Assessor Institutions and Individuals

Output 1.4 Establishment of the Personnel Registration Body (PRB) system

Output 2.1 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Potential Expert Panels

Output 2.2 Strengthening of Expertise in the Decision-Making Panel for the SFM Assessment

Output 2.3 Increase the Availability of Independent and Reliable Information on SFM

Output 2.4 Improvement of Knowledge and Awareness of SFM for

the Stakeholder

Output 2.5 Improvement of SFM and Forest Certification Network

Output 2.6 Establishment of Independent Training Institution

3. Target Beneficiaries Involvement

1. Government

2. Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)

3. Assessors and Experts Panel

4. Lessons Learned

4.1 Development lessons

4.1.1 Project Design




1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

5

6

6

6

7

7

8

8

8

8

8

8

9

9

10


/ ~/

4.1.2 Changes in inter-sectorallinks which affected the project's success 11

4.1.3 Additional arrangements that could improve the cooperation between relevant parties interested in the project 11

4.1.4 Factors which were most likely would affect project sustain ability after its completion 11

4.2 Operational Lessons 12

4.2.1 Project Organization and Management 12

4.2.2 Project Documentation 12

4.2.3 Monitoring and evaluation; Quality of Project Planning 13

4.2.4 Definition of roles and responsibility of the institution involved in the project implementation 13

4.2.5 Actions to be conducted to avoid miSinterpretation of activities between the planned and the actual implementation (schedule, cost, etc) 14

4.2.6 Internal factors influencing the project's implementation that have not been anticipated 14

4.2.7 External factors influencing the project's implementation that have not been anticipated 14

5. Recommendations 15

PART 11 MAIN TEXT 16 1. Project Content 16

1.1 Project description 16

Component 1: Development oft human resource as required for the field

assessment of sustainable forest management 16

Component 2: Institutional capacity building 17

1.2 Development Objectives 17

1.3 Specific Objectives 17

1.4 Expected outputs 18

Specific Objectives I 18

Specific Objectives II 18

1.5 Implementation Strategy 18

1.6 Project Work Plan 18

Component 1: Development of human resource for the field assessment

of sustainable forest management 18

Component 2: Institutional capacity building 19

1.7 Required Inputs 20

1.8 Project Rationale 21

1.9 Relevant Background Information 21

1.10 Project Location 22

I I I

I I

j

I I I I

I I I I

/ ~/

4.1.2 Changes in inter-sectorallinks which affected the project's success

4.1.3 Additional arrangements that could improve the cooperation between relevant parties interested in the project

4.1.4 Factors which were most likely would affect project sustain ability after its completion

4.2 Operational Lessons

4.2.1 Project Organization and Management

4.2.2 Project Documentation

4.2.3 Monitoring and evaluation; Quality of Project Planning

4.2.4 Definition of roles and responsibility of the institution involved in the project implementation

4.2.5 Actions to be conducted to avoid miSinterpretation of activities between the planned and the actual implementation (schedule, cost, etc)

4.2.6 Internal factors influencing the project's implementation that have not been anticipated

4.2.7 External factors influencing the project's implementation that have not been anticipated

5. Recommendations

PART 11 MAIN TEXT 1. Project Content

1.1 Project description

Component 1: Development oft human resource as required for the field

assessment of sustainable forest management

Component 2: Institutional capacity building

1.2 Development Objectives

1.3 Specific Objectives

1.4 Expected outputs

Specific Objectives I

Specific Objectives II

1.5 Implementation Strategy

1.6 Project Work Plan

Component 1: Development of human resource for the field assessment

of sustainable forest management


1.7 Required Inputs

1.8 Project Rationale

1.9 Relevant Background Information

1.10 Project Location

11

11

11

12

12

12

13

13

14

14

14

15

16 16

16

16

17

17

17

18

18

18

18

18

18

19

20

21

21

22

11

I!

11

I I I'

I I' I I I I I I I I

I I I I

J ,,' 1.11 Preliminary Activities

1.12 The ITTO Context

1. Compliance with the ITTA 1994 Objectives

2, Compliance with the ITTO Action Plan

2. Project Context

2,1 National and Sectoral Development Objectives

2,2 Link between the relevant sectors and the development plan

3. Project Design and Organization

3.1 Phase of Adequate Identification

3.2 Conceptual Foundation

3.3 Adequacy of Time and Other Resources for Project Formulation

3,4 Acceptance and Essentiality of Roles and Responsibilities of the

Institutions Involved in the Project implementation

3.5 Beneficiary Involvement in the Project's Efforts and Actions

4. Project Implementation 4.1 Significant Differences between Planned and Actual Implementation

1. On Costs 2. On Components 3. On Schedules 4. Outputs Achievements

a. Standardized Training for Assessors and Decision-Making Panels b. Number ofTrained Personnel c. Workshops d. Certification Database e, Institutional and Network Building

4.2 Measures and Steps Should be Taken to Avoid Discrepancy 4.3 Acceptability of Assumptions Made 4,4 Acceptability of Accurate Identification of the Risks Involved 4.5 Project Sustain ability from Implementation Outcome after the Project

Completion 4.6 Acceptability. of Project Inputs

5. Project Results

5.1. Situation Upon Project Completion as Compared to Situation in Pre-project

5.2 Extent to which the project's Specific Objectives was Achieved 5.3 Impact of the Project's Results on Sectoral Programs 5.4 Project Sustain ability After the Project Conceptualization 5.5 Assumptions Made and Prevailing Conditions Upon Completion

22

23

23

24

24

24

25

25

25

26 26

26 26

27 27 27 27 27 28 28 28 28 28 28

29 29 29

30 30

30

30 31 31 31 31

11

I I I

I I I I I I I I

I I I I

1.11 Preliminary Activities

1.12 The ITTO Context

1. Compliance with the ITT A 1994 Objectives

2. Compliance with the ITTO Action Plan

2. Project Context

2.1 National and Sectoral Development Objectives

2.2 Link between the relevant sectors and the development plan

3. Project Design and Organization

3.1 Phase of Adequate Identification

3.2 Conceptual Foundation


3.4 Acceptance and Essentiality of Roles and Responsibilities of the

Institutions Involved in the Project implementation

3.5 Beneficiary Involvement in the Project's Efforts and Actions

4. Project Implementation 4.1 Significant Differences between Planned and Actual Implementation

1. On Costs 2. On Components 3. On Schedules 4. Outputs Achievements

a. Standardized Training for Assessors and Decision-Making Panels b. Number ofTrained Personnel c. Workshops d. Certification Database e. Institutional and Network Building

4.2 Measures and Steps Should be Taken to Avoid Discrepancy 4.3 Acceptability of Assumptions Made 4.4 Acceptability of Accurate Identification of the Risks Involved 4.5 Project Sustain ability from Implementation Outcome after the Project

Completion 4.6 Acceptability. of Project Inputs

5. Project Results

5.1. Situation Upon Project Completion as Compared to Situation in Pre-project

5.2 Extent to which the project's Specific Objectives was Achieved 5.3 Impact of the Project's Results on Sectoral Programs 5.4 Project Sustain ability After the Project Conceptualization 5.5 Assumptions Made and Prevailing Conditions Upon Completion

22

23

23

24

24

24

25

25

25

26 26

26 26

27 27 27 27 27 28 28 28 28 28 28

29 29 29

30 30

30

30 31 31 31 31

11

I I 11

I r I I I I!

11 "

11

IJ

I I I I I I I;

/ /./'

6. Synthesis of the Analysis 6.1. Specific Objectives in Achievements and Outputs 6.2 Outputs 6.3 Schedule 6.4 Actual Expenditures 6.5 Potentiality of Reproduction 6.6 Potentiality to Larger Scale

PART III CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS

1. Development Lessons 1.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System 1.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel 1.3 Strengthening of Institutional Capacity

2. Operational Lessons 2.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System 2.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel

3. Recommendation for Future Projects 3.1 Identification 3.2 Design 3.3 Implementation 3.4 Organization 3.5 Managemen 3.6 Responsible for the report

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX 1 List of Trained Assessor

APPENDIX 2 List of Trained Decision Making Expert Panel

APPENDIX 3 List of Trained Chain of Custody Assessor

APPENDIX 4 Photo of Project Activities

APPENDIX 5 List of Regional Consultation Forum Secretariat (FKD)

APPENDIX 6 Acknowledgement of Lei Certification

APPENDIX 7 Joint Certification Protocol LEI and FSC

32 32 32 32 33 33 33

34

34 34 34 35 35 35 36

37 37 37 37 38 38 38

39

11

1I

1 I;

Ij

I!

11 "

11

IJ

11

11

1 1 11

11

I;

/ /./'

6. Synthesis of the Analysis 6.1. Specific Objectives in Achievements and Outputs 6.2 Outputs 6.3 Schedule 6.4 Actual Expenditures 6.5 Potentiality of Reproduction 6.6 Potentiality to Larger Scale

PART III CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS

1. Development Lessons 1.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System 1.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel 1.3 Strengthening of Institutional Capacity

2. Operational Lessons 2.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System 2.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel

3. Recommendation for Future Projects 3.1 Identification 3.2 Design 3.3 Implementation 3.4 Organization 3.5 Managemen 3.6 Responsible for the report

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX 1 List of Trained Assessor

APPENDIX 2 List of Trained Decision Making Expert Panel

APPENDIX 3 List of Trained Chain of Custody Assessor

APPENDIX 4 Photo of Project Activities

APPENDIX 5 List of Regional Consultation Forum Secretariat (FKD)

APPENDIX 6 Acknowledgement of Lei Certification

APPENDIX 7 Joint Certification Protocol LEI and FSC

32 32 32 32 33 33 33

34

34 34 34 35 35 35 36

37 37 37 37 38 38 38

39

I I I I ~\o-'

I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I

~:j


Established in 1998 after a four-year development as a national working group on ecolabelling, the Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute (Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia - LEI) is now a national accreditation body for ecolabelling certification in Indonesia. LEI aims to promote sustainable natural resources and environmental management in Indonesia, by use of a credible ecolabeling certification.

In 1998 LEI completed its development of a national certification system for natural production forest, which also includes criteria and indicators (C&I) for Sustainable Forest Management (SFM). LEI's C&I has a nearly 100% compatibility with those of ITTO and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). In developing its certification system, LEI adopted three key principles of ecolabelling certification, Le. multi-stakeholder approach, independent thirdparty assessment and voluntary certification.

A major obstacle facing LEI in implementing its system in 1998 was lack of qualified and experienced assessors and expert panel members needed to conduct field assessment and determine a certification decision, respectively. Even though a number of certified environmental assessors and field surveyors were already available at that time, they are specialized in environmental impact assessment. Yet, ecolabelling certification significantly differs from environmental impact assessment because it is a performance-based, instead of a process-based, assessment. Moreover, ecolabelling certification involves not only environmental (or ecological), but also production and socio-cultural C&ls.

To rectify the problem, with a funding support amounting to USD 658,744.53 from ITTO, LEI carried out this project from February 1998 to December 2000. The project includes development of training curricula and materials, manuals for expert panel members and information kits. A series of training for trainers, training for asse~sors and expert panels, and promotional programs to enhance public and stakeholder awareness on ecolabelling and SFM-related topics were undertaken. During the project's period, LEI's certification system was significantly improved by feed backs received from training participants.

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia 1

I I I

I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I


Established in 1998 after a four-year development as a national working group on ecolabelling, the Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute (Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia - LEI) is now a national accreditation body for ecolabelling certification in Indonesia. LEI aims to promote sustainable natural resources and environmental management in Indonesia, by use of a credible ecolabeling certification.

In 1998 LEI completed its development of a national certification system for natural production forest, which also includes criteria and indicators (C&I) for Sustainable Forest Management (SFM). LEI's C&I has a nearly 100% compatibility with those of ITTO and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). In developing its certification system, LEI adopted three key principles of ecolabelling certification, Le. multi-stakeholder approach, independent thirdparty assessment and voluntary certification.

A major obstacle facing LEI in implementing its system in 1998 was lack of qualified and experienced assessors and expert panel members needed to conduct field assessment and determine a certification decision, respectively. Even though a number of certified environmental assessors and field surveyors were already available at that time, they are specialized in environmental impact assessment. Yet, ecolabelling certification significantly differs from environmental impact assessment because it is a performance-based, instead of a process-based, assessment. Moreover, ecolabelling certification involves not only environmental (or ecological), but also production and socio-cultural C&ls.

To rectify the problem, with a funding support amounting to USD 658,744.53 from ITTO, LEI carried out this project from February 1998 to December 2000. The project includes development of training curricula and materials, manuals for expert panel members and information kits. A series of training for trainers, training for asse~sors and expert panels, and promotional programs to enhance public and stakeholder awareness on ecolabelling and SFM-related topics were undertaken. During the project's period, LEI's certification system was significantly improved by feed backs received from training participants.



,After its completion, the project has produced the following documents/books:

• Refined C&ls,

• Training guidelines for field assessors with respect to production, ecological and socio-cultural C&ls,

• Training guidelines for expert panel members. (Note, under LEI system, a certification decision is made by an independent, ad hoc, expert panel).

• Training guidelines for trainers.

• Guidelines for accreditation of independent training institution and personnel registration body.

• Training manuals and materials for SFM and Chain of Custody assessors with respect to production, ecological and socio-cultural C&ls.

• Training manuals and materials for SFM decision making panel (expert panel) members.

• Training manuals and materials for trainers.

• Ecolabelling news (Warta Ekolabel).

Other outputs of the project include:

• Improved database through establishment of LEI's homepage and library

• Improved ecolabelling network with establishment of Regional/Provincial Consultation Forum (Forum Komunikasi Daerah - FKD) in 8 provinces. These provinces are East Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, North Sumatra, Riau, South East Sulawesi, North Sulawesi and Papua/Maluku.

• Accreditation of an independent training institution.

• Accreditation process for independent personnel registration body (PR B). But due to failure of PRB candidates to meet LEI's accreditation guidelines, for the moment LEI still act as a temporary PRB

• LEI's involvement in international forum and conferences

As a result of the project, Indonesia now has 142 registered SFM assessors including 16 lead assessors, 81 expert panel members, 40 Chain-of-Custody assessors, and 16 SFM certification trainers. These pools of well-trained and more experienced personnel have enabled better implementation of ecolabelling certification in Indonesia. On August 28,2000 LEI issued accreditation for four certification bodies, i.e. SGS Indonesia, TUV International (an Indonesia-Germany joint venture), Sucofindo and Mutu Agung Lestari. As of September 2001, there have been ten forest management units with a total area of 2,068,986 hectares applying for ecolabelling certification. On April 3, 2001 LEI granted its first certificate under LEI-FSC Joint Certification program to PT Diamond Raya Timber in Riau with an area of 90,957 ha. Notwithstanding these encouraging developments, LEI still encounters many big challenges in its attempts to implement a credible certification. For this reason, LEI will continue to work closely with ITTO and other institutions to realize its vision and mission in promoting sustainable forest management.


I I I I I I I I I I I I , '.

I I I I I I I I

,After its completion, the project has produced the following documents/books:

• Refined C&ls,

• Training guidelines for field assessors with respect to production, ecological and socio-cultural C&ls,

• Training guidelines for expert panel members. (Note, under LEI system, a certification decision is made by an independent, ad hoc, expert panel).

• Training guidelines for trainers.

• Guidelines for accreditation of independent training institution and personnel registration body.

• Training manuals and materials for SFM and Chain of Custody assessors with respect to production, ecological and socio-cultural C&ls.

• Training manuals and materials for SFM decision making panel (expert panel) members.

• Training manuals and materials for trainers.

• Ecolabelling news (Warta Ekolabel).

Other outputs of the project include:

• Improved database through establishment of LEI's homepage and library

• Improved ecolabelling network with establishment of Regional/Provincial Consultation Forum (Forum Komunikasi Daerah - FKD) in 8 provinces. These provinces are East Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, North Sumatra, Riau, South East Sulawesi, North Sulawesi and Papua/Maluku.

• Accreditation of an independent training institution.

• Accreditation process for independent personnel registration body (PR B). But due to failure of PRB candidates to meet LEI's accreditation guidelines, for the moment LEI still act as a temporary PRB

• LEI's involvement in international forum and conferences

As a result of the project, Indonesia now has 142 registered SFM assessors including 16 lead assessors, 81 expert panel members, 40 Chain-of-Custody assessors, and 16 SFM certification trainers. These pools of well-trained and more experienced personnel have enabled better implementation of ecolabelling certification in Indonesia. On August 28,2000 LEI issued accreditation for four certification bodies, i.e. SGS Indonesia, TUV International (an Indonesia-Germany joint venture), Sucofindo and Mutu Agung Lestari. As of September 2001, there have been ten forest management units with a total area of 2,068,986 hectares applying for ecolabelling certification. On April 3, 2001 LEI granted its first certificate under LEI-FSC Joint Certification program to PT Diamond Raya Timber in Riau with an area of 90,957 ha. Notwithstanding these encouraging developments, LEI still encounters many big challenges in its attempts to implement a credible certification. For this reason, LEI will continue to work closely with ITTO and other institutions to realize its vision and mission in promoting sustainable forest management.



Output 1.1 Improved Data Collection and Field Analysis Method Following the development of criteria and indicators of SFM certification the development/establishment of technical methods of collecting necessary data for DMP shall be facilitated.

Defining these methods is the problem addressed by this output. In pursuing this task, LEI has been consistently supported by prominent Indonesian expert team representing the field of forest resources and production, forest ecology, social forestry and operation research in decision-making process of SFM Certification. The experts have an important role in the process of developing the technical aspects of the SFM assessment system. To get a comparative perspective LEI also welcomed the participation of expatriate forestry experts and certification specialist in field test programme and appropriable workshops. Among others, LEI has organized a joint field assessment and workshops to evaluate the manuals of data collection with International Experts from Smartwood, GTZ, and WWF. From August 22 to September 3, 1999, LEI ran a joint field works with SGS Qualifor and Forest Stewardship Council in terms of conducting a pilot assessment, which was based on LEI system. As a result of this process, the Project has documented refined methods of data collecting that are practical for actual assessment in the field.

Output 1.2 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Professionals in the Certification of SFM LEI has completed a Standardized Training Curriculum and Training Manuals for field assessors and assessor's trainers. In light of concerns of immediate need for assessors and expert panel members, LEI has tested the standardized training curriculum and manuals by conducting pilot trainings of SFM assessor at June 22 to July 2, 1998 in Jakarta. In the refining work of the training system, LEI has also invited training experts from SGS Qualifor, Smartwood and GTZ. Based on the refinement result of curriculum and manuals, LEI has completed the modules and instructors' manuals, to standardize training for SFM certification assessor.

In addition, LEI has also conducted the designing of Chain-of-Custody (COC) training system designated for the tracing of raw timber source used in wood based products. The Chain-of-Custody certification itself is a method to track whether a raw timber was originally coming from a certified forest or not. COC is becoming an important tool requested by



Output 1.1 Improved Data Collection and Field Analysis Method Following the development of criteria and indicators of SFM certification the development/establishment of technical methods of collecting necessary data for DMP shall be facilitated.

Defining these methods is the problem addressed by this output. In pursuing this task, LEI has been consistently supported by prominent Indonesian expert team representing the field of forest resources and production, forest ecology, social forestry and operation research in decision-making process of SFM Certification. The experts have an important role in the process of developing the technical aspects of the SFM assessment system. To get a comparative perspective LEI also welcomed the participation of expatriate forestry experts and certification specialist in field test programme and appropriable workshops. Among others, LEI has organized a joint field assessment and workshops to evaluate the manuals of data collection with International Experts from Smartwood, GTZ, and WWF. From August 22 to September 3, 1999, LEI ran a joint field works with SGS Qualifor and Forest Stewardship Council in terms of conducting a pilot assessment, which was based on LEI system. As a result of this process, the Project has documented refined methods of data collecting that are practical for actual assessment in the field.

Output 1.2 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Professionals in the Certification of SFM LEI has completed a Standardized Training Curriculum and Training Manuals for field assessors and assessor's trainers. In light of concerns of immediate need for assessors and expert panel members, LEI has tested the standardized training curriculum and manuals by conducting pilot trainings of SFM assessor at June 22 to July 2, 1998 in Jakarta. In the refining work of the training system, LEI has also invited training experts from SGS Qualifor, Smartwood and GTZ. Based on the refinement result of curriculum and manuals, LEI has completed the modules and instructors' manuals, to standardize training for SFM certification assessor.

In addition, LEI has also conducted the designing of Chain-of-Custody (COC) training system designated for the tracing of raw timber source used in wood based products. The Chain-of-Custody certification itself is a method to track whether a raw timber was originally coming from a certified forest or not. COC is becoming an important tool requested by



" .. .¥

" many environmentally concerned consumers determinates by their buyer's preference.

The training system for Chain-of-Custody (COC) assessors was refined also, by training on April 17 to April 19, 2000 in Sukabumi, Jambi, preceded by a pilot training held on February 17-18, 2000. LEI has also carried-out the training for lead assessors on Sustainable Production Forest Management, in Jambi, February 13 to February 18, 2000 using the newly refined training system.

Output 1.3 Improvement of Assessor Institutions and Individuals Capability The majority of available assessors in Indonesia comes from environmental impact field and they have no previous experience in using the LEI indicators and criteria during an assessment. The situation had created an urgency to upgrade the capability of available personnel in the practical techniques of SFM assessment using LEI criteria and indicators. That is the problem addressed with the completion of this output.

In this output, LEI has completed the setting up of assessor's grade for assessors, training of the trainers, recruitment of trainers based on observation of potential assessors, training for assessors by trained trainers, and examination for certified assessors. In addition to professional assessors, LEI has trained other skilled persons who possess minimum qualifications of LEI Assessors requirements.

Registration, recording of past experience, tracking of record and capacity are performed by an independent personnel registration, which also conducts placement of assessors according to their grade. (The grade consist of: 1) Junior assessor, 2). Middle-level assessor, and 3). Senior assessor). The step was taken to ensure the uphold of quality levels and personnel integrity in implementing the SFM certification system.

Training of the trainers was conducted in Pasir-Mayang Jambi, Feb 13 to 18, 2000, with 19 participants. Those participants were planned to be recruited as trainers for the future training of assessors. To create a pool of qualified assessors, there were numerous training for assessors that were led by instructors and trainers from the previous training. The same method applied during the training conducted in Sukabumi, with 54 participants.

Output 1.4 Establishment of the Personnel Registration Body (PRB) system In program extension approved by ITTO committee on the CEM, No-



many environmentally concerned consumers determinates by their buyer's preference.

The training system for Chain-of-Custody (COC) assessors was refined also, by training on April 17 to April 19, 2000 in Sukabumi, Jambi, preceded by a pilot training held on February 17-18, 2000. LEI has also carried-out the training for lead assessors on Sustainable Production Forest Management, in Jambi, February 13 to February 18, 2000 using the newly refined training system.

Output 1.3 Improvement of Assessor Institutions and Individuals Capability The majority of available assessors in Indonesia comes from environmental impact field and they have no previous experience in using the LEI indicators and criteria during an assessment. The situation had created an urgency to upgrade the capability of available personnel in the practical techniques of SFM assessment using LEI criteria and indicators. That is the problem addressed with the completion of this output.

In this output, LEI has completed the setting up of assessor's grade for assessors, training of the trainers, recruitment of trainers based on observation of potential assessors, training for assessors by trained trainers, and examination for certified assessors. In addition to professional assessors, LEI has trained other skilled persons who possess minimum qualifications of LEI Assessors requirements.

Registration, recording of past experience, tracking of record and capacity are performed by an independent personnel registration, which also conducts placement of assessors according to their grade. (The grade consist of: 1) Junior assessor, 2). Middle-level assessor, and 3). Senior assessor). The step was taken to ensure the uphold of quality levels and personnel integrity in implementing the SFM certification system.

Training of the trainers was conducted in Pasir-Mayang Jambi, Feb 13 to 18, 2000, with 19 participants. Those participants were planned to be recruited as trainers for the future training of assessors. To create a pool of qualified assessors, there were numerous training for assessors that were led by instructors and trainers from the previous training. The same method applied during the training conducted in Sukabumi, with 54 participants.

Output 1.4 Establishment of the Personnel Registration Body (PRB) system In program extension approved by ITTO committee on the CEM, No-



;' .f

p' vember 2, 1999, in Yokohama, Japan, the establishment of a Personnel Registration Body (PRB) was added as a new program in the PD 1/95 Project. The PRB itself has a double purpose of raising the standards of profeSSional competence and monitoring the conduct of SFM personnel in the field.

In regard to it's function, PRB has the task of registering professional assessors and examining the assessor's competence in SFM certification assessment. The PRB also grades the assessors level by reviewing past experience in assessment of each individual assessor.

I n order to achieve the establishment of an independent Personnel Registration Body, a process of workshops and public consultation that were participated by various stakeholders (NGO's, government, private companies) were undertaken. It was followed by an accreditation process to determine the most qualified and suitable institution/organization to be functioned as an independent PRB. This process was held on January 27 to January 28, 2001, though it was originally planned to take place in late December 2000, but later postponed due to the many national holidays during that month.

In this process, due to lack of public's interest to become an independent PRB as well as lack of pre-conditions possessed by applying institutions, it was decided by the accreditation panel members that for the time being the functions of Personnel Registration Body would be handled by LE!.

Output 2.1 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Potential Expert Panels In addition to the availability of a pool of skillful and well-trained field assessors in the LEI-SFM certification system, the availability of adequate number of potential experts panel for the decision making process was crucial during the implementation of LEl's sustainable forest management certification system. To ensure an equal understanding regarding the LEI certification system by expert panels in the decision-making process, a standardized training procedures must be established. This was the problem addressed along with completion of the activities in this Project output.

In achieving this objective LEI has undertaken the process of designing a curriculum, and manuals for the decision-making panels, this was performed through a series of evaluation and workshops. A pilot training for decision-making panels has been conducted on February 8 to February 13, 1998 in Jakarta, with 29 participants, in 1999 a second training was held with 21 partiCipant. It was followed with a review and refinement process, which was done in collaboration with the Centre of Education and Training for Forestry Estate, assessors, community representatives, professionals, experience trainers, expatriates from concerned institutions (GTZ, SGS) and the Ministry of Forestry.



/ .f

p' vember 2, 1999, in Yokohama, Japan, the establishment of a Personnel Registration Body (PRB) was added as a new program in the PD 1/95 Project. The PRB itself has a double purpose of raising the standards of profeSSional competence and monitoring the conduct of SFM personnel in the field.

In regard to it's function, PRB has the task of registering professional assessors and examining the assessor's competence in SFM certification assessment. The PRB also grades the assessors level by reviewing past experience in assessment of each individual assessor.

In order to achieve the establishment of an independent Personnel Registration Body, a process of workshops and public consultation that were participated by various stakeholders (NGO's, government, private companies) were undertaken. It was followed by an accreditation process to determine the most qualified and suitable institution/organization to be functioned as an independent PRB. This process was held on January 27 to January 28, 2001, though it was originally planned to take place in late December 2000, but later postponed due to the many national holidays during that month.

In this process, due to lack of public's interest to become an independent PRB as well as lack of pre-conditions possessed by applying institutions, it was decided by the accreditation panel members that for the time being the functions of Personnel Registration Body would be handled by LE!.

Output 2.1 Standardized Training Curriculum and Manuals for Potential Expert Panels In addition to the availability of a pool of skillful and well-trained field assessors in the LEI-SFM certification system, the availability of adequate number of potential experts panel for the decision making process was crucial during the implementation of LEl's sustainable forest management certification system. To ensure an equal understanding regarding the LEI certification system by expert panels in the decision-making process, a standardized training procedures must be established. This was the problem addressed along with completion of the activities in this Project output.

In achieving this objective LEI has undertaken the process of designing a curriculum, and manuals for the decision-making panels, this was performed through a series of evaluation and workshops. A pilot training for decision-making panels has been conducted on February 8 to February 13, 1998 in Jakarta, with 29 participants, in 1999 a second training was held with 21 partiCipant. It was followed with a review and refinement process, which was done in collaboration with the Centre of Education and Training for Forestry Estate, assessors, community representatives, professionals, experience trainers, expatriates from concerned institutions (GTZ, SGS) and the Ministry of Forestry.



" 4-::::.=.-::::::::::::::.... . ....................... " .... H..... . ... " ........................................ ..

Output 2.2 Strengthening of Expertise in the DecisionMaking Panel for the SFM Assessment As the decision-making panel is a vital component in the LEI certification system, the member must fully comprehend the certification system even though many of them are prominent figures in their relevant fields. Affirming the concept of LEI SFM certification to them was the purpose of this output.

All three activities under this output have been completed. They were: first, setting up of a recruitment system of decision-making panel members, which were selected from prominent experts and local figures.

Second, completion of training workshop for decision-making panel, and, third, the implementation of training workshop for decision making panel members which were done on 27th January 2000 with 12 participant and on 3-4 May 2000 with 19 partiCipant.

The recruitment process for decision-making panel members, were conducted by careful selection of participants during training workshops.

Output 2.3 Increase the Availability of Independent and Reliable Information on SFM To increase the availability of independent and reliable information on SFM, LEI has issued a number of publications, including the "Warta Ekolabel" (Ecolabelling News). Altogether, LEI has developed an SFM web site, that contains, among others, LEl's certification system and other relevant materials. The address is www.lei.or.id. As part of networking in the internet, LEI has participated and led a regular column organized by LEAD-and Sustainable Development Foundation- "terranet" (www.terranet.or.id).

Output 2.4 Improvement of Knowledge and Awareness of SFM for the Stakeholder To fulfill this output LEI undertook a special training/socialization program, held in Treva Hotel, Jakarta, on July 5 to July 11, 2000. Comprising of three stages, the training were aimed to improve understanding and networking amongst various stakeholders involved in the achievement of sustainable forest management through certification. The first stage was participated by government officials and press members, while NGOs, academics and players in the forestry-based industries met each other in the second and third stages.

Activities covering educational campaign and workshops for non-gov-


I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

,.£.: ..... · ....... · .. ··.··.····· ................ M ....... .

Output 2.2 Strengthening of Expertise in the DecisionMaking Panel for the SFM Assessment As the decision-making panel is a vital component in the LEI certification system, the member must fully comprehend the certification system even though many of them are prominent figures in their relevant fields. Affirming the concept of LEI SFM certification to them was the purpose of this output.

All three activities under this output have been completed. They were: first, setting up of a recruitment system of decision-making panel members, which were selected from prominent experts and local figures.

Second, completion of training workshop for decision-making panel, and, third, the implementation of training workshop for decision making panel members which were done on 27th January 2000 with 12 participant and on 3-4 May 2000 with 19 partiCipant.

The recruitment process for decision-making panel members, were conducted by careful selection of participants during training workshops.

Output 2.3 Increase the Availability of Independent and Reliable Information on SFM To increase the availability of independent and reliable information on SFM, LEI has issued a number of publications, including the "Warta Ekolabel" (Ecolabelling News). Altogether, LEI has developed an SFM web site, that contains, among others, LEl's certification system and other relevant materials. The address is www.lei.or.id. As part of networking in the internet, LEI has participated and led a regular column organized by LEAD-and Sustainable Development Foundation- "terranet" (www.terranet.or.id).

Output 2.4 Improvement of Knowledge and Awareness of SFM for the Stakeholder To fulfill this output LEI undertook a special training/socialization program, held in Treva Hotel, Jakarta, on July 5 to July 11, 2000. Comprising of three stages, the training were aimed to improve understanding and networking amongst various stakeholders involved in the achievement of sustainable forest management through certification. The first stage was participated by government officials and press members, while NGOs, academics and players in the forestry-based industries met each other in the second and third stages.

Activities covering educational campaign and workshops for non-gov-


I I I

I I

I I

-I I I I I I I I I I

I I

/ i' ernment organizations, forest managers, related government institutions

and media on sustainable forest management and forest certification, have been conducted. International campaigns on Indonesia's sustainable forest management and forest certification, accompanied by dissemination of posters as an educational campaign to all stakeholders and concession holders on sustainable forest management and certification have also been completed.

Output 2.5 Improvement of SFM and Forest Certification Network One of the main activities of this output is the establishment of local communication forums, termed as the Regional Communication Forum (RCF). The forum is aimed to increase local government and NGO personnel active involvement in LEl's certification process. These forums also provides a pool of individuals readily equipped with the basic knowledge of certification and techniques at the local level, of which LEI and LE I-accredited certifiers may coordinate their sourcing for potential members for Experts Panel and/or certification observers. A series of RCF trainings were conducted in eight regions (provinces) i.e. Riau, North Sulawesi, South-East Sulawesi, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, and Maluku-Irian Jaya. In addition, an extension of the project to July, 2000, have included Northern Sumatera and Central Kalimantan in this training.

Activities on designing of a national network, setting up of a mailing list for Indonesia sustainable forest management and forest certification in the internet, establishment of international linkage with certification related organizations and comparative study on forest certification programs have been completed.

Following the extension of the project, additional activities on setting up a partnership in communication forum have also been completed.

Output 2.6 Establishment of Independent Training Institution This output was an added program, as part of the extension given to the project PD 1/95 until August 6,2000 which was approved by ITTO committee on Committe on the Economics and Market Intelligence, (CEM), November 2, 1999, in Yokohama, Japan.

The purpose of this output was to assure continual development and evolving of training manuals and curriculums with the latest techniques and practice. To accomplish this, LEI has accredited an independent training institution to conduct training activities in reference to the standardized curriculum, syllabus and manuals.


I

I

I I

I I I

I

I I

/ ernment organizations, forest managers, related government institutions and media on sustainable forest management and forest certification, have been conducted. International campaigns on Indonesia's sustainable forest management and forest certification, accompanied by dissemination of posters as an educational campaign to all stakeholders and concession holders on sustainable forest management and certification have also been completed.

Output 2.5 Improvement of SFM and Forest Certification Network One of the main activities of this output is the establishment of local communication forums, termed as the Regional Communication Forum (RCF). The forum is aimed to increase local government and NGO personnel active involvement in LEl's certification process. These forums also provides a pool of individuals readily equipped with the basic knowledge of certification and techniques at the local level, of which LEI and LE I-accredited certifiers may coordinate their sourcing for potential members for Experts Panel and/or certification observers. A series of RCF trainings were conducted in eight regions (provinces) i.e. Riau, North Sulawesi, South-East Sulawesi, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, and Maluku-Irian Jaya. In addition, an extension of the project to July, 2000, have included Northern Sumatera and Central Kalimantan in this training.

Activities on designing of a national network, setting up of a mailing list for Indonesia sustainable forest management and forest certification in the internet, establishment of international linkage with certification related organizations and comparative study on forest certification programs have been completed.

Following the extension of the project, additional activities on setting up a partnership in communication forum have also been completed.

Output 2.6 Establishment of Independent Training Institution This output was an added program, as part of the extension given to the project PD 1/95 until August 6,2000 which was approved by ITTO committee on Committe on the Economics and Market Intelligence, (CEM), November 2,1999, in Yokohama, Japan.

The purpose of this output was to assure continual development and evolving of training manuals and curriculums with the latest techniques and practice. To accomplish this, LEI has accredited an independent training institution to conduct training activities in reference to the standardized curriculum, syllabus and manuals.



/ i

" The accreditation process was conducted through a series of workshops and public forums with a result the accreditation of Foundation Conservation of Natural Resources (YBLH).

Independent training institutes are invited to conduct training activities in accordance with the existing training system in terms of curriculum, syllabus, and other necessary requirements. The training system itself encompassed assessor's training, training for the trainers, and training for expert panels, all of which are in line with certification system.

The beneficiaries that directly benefited from this Project were assessors, experts, and concessionaire-holders by increase of their capabilities in the work of assessment, evaluation and implementation of Sustainable Forest Management. The Project has also affected many stakeholders as it has provided updated knowledge about Sustainable Forest Management. The international forestry community has also benefited from the development of methodology, curricula and training manuals as an additional reference to be considered in the implementation of training activities on Sustainable Forrest Management Assessment. Ultimately, global environment has also been positively affected as the conscience to sustainably manage the forest had the impact of reducing the rate of deforestation and in turn, had helped the improving of global environmental condition.

1. Government Steps have been taken through continual collaboration with the Ministry of Forestry to conduct training and workshops with concerned parties that have given considerable inputs on the implementation of this Project as their involvement have been co-substantial.

"H .......... HH ... • _ ..... __ ....................... __ •••• " ••••• " ••••• _ ........ __ ... _...... • ....... _ •••• __ ...... H .................. __ ... • ......... ___ ....................... -..

2. Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) NGO's were actively involved in allleves of the Project and their contributions have been very Significant in many areas of the Project, such as FWI who has been a major partner in the establishment of Regional Consultations in the provincial area, LATIN, and many local NGO's who are actively involved in the forest monitoring.

3. Assessors and Experts Panel Activities such as the issuance of Training Manuals for Decision-making Panels, Training Manuals for Analytical Hierarchy Procedures have been completed altogether with other activities, like Pilot Training for Expert Panel, Pilot Training Evaluation, Workshop to Review Curricula and Materials for Decision-making Panels, Refinement of Training Curriculum and Manuals for Decision-making, and Refinement of AHP training manuals that also have been completed by involving experienced and qualified assessors and experts panel.



The accreditation process was conducted through a series of workshops and public forums with a result the accreditation of Foundation Conservation of Natural Resources (YBLH).

Independent training institutes are invited to conduct training activities in accordance with the existing training system in terms of curriculum, syllabus, and other necessary requirements. The training system itself encompassed assessor's training, training for the trainers, and training for expert panels, all of which are in line with certification system.

The beneficiaries that directly benefited from this Project were assessors, experts, and concessionaire-holders by increase of their capabilities in the work of assessment, evaluation and implementation of Sustainable Forest Management. The Project has also affected many stakeholders as it has provided updated knowledge about Sustainable Forest Management. Jhe international forestry community has also benefited from the development of methodology, curricula and training manuals as an additional reference to be considered in the implementation of training activities on Sustainable Forrest Management Assessment. Ultimately, global environment has also been positively affected as the conscience to sustainably manage the forest had the impact of reducing the rate of deforestation and in turn, had helped the improving of global environmental condition.

1. Government Steps have been taken through continual collaboration with the Ministry of Forestry to conduct training and workshops with concerned parties that have given considerable inputs on the implementation of this Project as their involvement have been co-substantial.

2. Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) NGO's were actively involved in all leves of the Project and their contributions have been very significant in many areas of the Project, such as FWI who has been a major partner in the establishment of Regional Consultations in the provincial area, LATIN, and many local NGO's who are actively involved in the forest monitoring.

3. Assessors and Experts Panel Activities such as the issuance of Training Manuals for Decision-making Panels, Training Manuals for Analytical Hierarchy Procedures have been completed altogether with other activities, like Pilot Training for Expert Panel, Pilot Training Evaluation, Workshop to Review Curricula and Materials for Decision-making Panels, Refinement of Training Curriculum and Manuals for Decision-making, and Refinement of AHP training manuals that also have been completed by involving experienced and qualified assessors and experts panel.


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I

I I

I

4.1. Development lessons

4.1.1. Project Design

Project design is the most important factor in leading into successful achievement of the objectives. The Project proposal (PD1/95) objectives indicated the implementation of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia could be accelerated. With this claim there are several targets that have to be achieved by the Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute, such as:

a. Completion of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management certification system;

b. Improvement of the capacity of certification personnel, for example: assessors, expert panels and the local community as well as the other stakeholders of forest certification;

c. Strengthening of the institutional capacity of parties involved in the certification process.


The Sustainable Forest Management certification system developed by LEI has adopted several international initiatives, such as the ITTO guidelines, the FSC Principles and Criteria, and others. During it's of conception, LEI has also involved other stakeholders such as NGO's, the Government (Ministry of Forestry), Association of Indonesian Forest Entrepreneur (APHI), academic community and research institutes. This step was taken so that the development of the LEI system was inherent with the principles of maximum transparency and neutrality. Since 1996, LEI certification system has been tested in the field and a few additional refinement has been made by the early 1998, the same year LEI certification system started its implementation.

To obtain public and international confidence as a credible system and to refine field assessment methods, LEI has conducted the Improving of Data Collection and Field Analysis Method, through workshops in cooperation with the FSC. The result was the protocal of Joint Certification Program (JCP) in accordance with the Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA). The JCP Program is still ongoing with the purpose of strengthening the bargaining position of LEI in facing other forest certification initiatives, FSC among others. This course is taken to convince foreign interests of the high-degree of credibility of national-based system. This will earn the LEI system


I I I I I

I

I

I I

I

4.1. Development lessons

4.1.1. Project Design

Project design is the most important factor in leading into successful achievement of the objectives. The Project proposal (PD1/95) objectives indicated the implementation of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia could be accelerated. With this claim there are several targets that have to be achieved by the Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute, such as:

a. Completion of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management certification system;

b. Improvement of the capacity of certification personnel, for example: assessors, expert panels and the local community as well as the other stakeholders of forest certification;

c. Strengthening of the institutional capacity of parties involved in the certification process.


The Sustainable Forest Management certification system developed by LEI has adopted several international initiatives, such as the ITTO guidelines, the FSC Principles and Criteria, and others. During it's of conception, LEI has also involved other stakeholders such as NGO's, the Government (Ministry of Forestry), Association of Indonesian Forest Entrepreneur (APHI), academic community and research institutes. This step was taken so that the development of the LEI system was inherent with the principles of maximum transparency and neutrality. Since 1996, LEI certification system has been tested in the field and a few additional refinement has been made by the early 1998, the same year LEI certification system started its implementation.

To obtain public and international confidence as a credible system and to refine field assessment methods, LEI has conducted the Improving of Data Collection and Field Analysis Method, through workshops in cooperation with the FSC. The result was the protocal of Joint Certification Program (JCP) in accordance with the Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA). The JCP Program is still ongoing with the purpose of strengthening the bargaining position of LEI in facing other forest certification initiatives, FSC among others. This course is taken to convince foreign interests of the high-degree of credibility of national-based system. This will earn the LEI system



.' .i'

a status as a compatible certification system to an internationally recognized system as well as being acceptable to local views.


To increase the capability of certification personnel such as: field assessors, expert panels, trainers, and public community, several steps were needed to be taken, which were: 1) Creating a standardized socialization and training system, 2) Implementation of those systems. The availability of a standardized training system will ensure the implementation of well-structured and consistent training. It will also give some assistance to other parties who would like to be involved in the training and socialization program.

The standardized training system consisted of curriculum and syllabus, methodology, modules, and the use of training support materials.

The creation of the system was conducted by involving related parties such as the Forestry Ministry's Center of Education and Training, Center of Environmental Standards, Association of Field Assessors, Association of Forest Entrepreneur, academic community and training institutions. A number of foreign institutions have also made their contribution in the compiling work, like GTZ, Smart Wood and SGS Forestry.

The Training that use the standardized training system involved field assessor, expert panels and the socialization of the SFM certification. Field assessor training has produced 137 assessors, while expert panel training has produced 81 candidates from different science disciplines (production, ecology and socia~.

The socialization of SFM certification was focused on the acceptance of certification by related parties in the field, such as the NGO's, local government, provincial planning agency and the public in general. With this effort the certification system shall not only be accepted by certification bodies but also by the public as an element in decision-maker by positioning their interest in forest certification process, both nationally and locally.


In addition to qualified personnel, an existing involvement of institution in certification process required a high degree of credibility. SFM certification bodies responsible to perform certification following the process of pre-assessment to deciSion-making and monitoring, should be able to show a good performance, which could be indicated by evidence of: 1) free from any conflict of interest (especially with the Forest Management Unit); 2) sufficient resources, and, 3) posses a management quality system that can assure uncorrupt conduct, and, be willing to take the implementation consequences of the certification system.

Capacity strengthening of the certification bodies institution have



a status as a compatible certification system to an internationally recognized system as well as being acceptable to local views.


To increase the capability of certification personnel such as: field assessors, expert panels, trainers, and public community, several steps were needed to be taken, which were: 1) Creating a standardized socialization and training system, 2) Implementation of those systems. The availability of a standardized training system will ensure the implementation of well-structured and consistent training. It will also give some assistance to other parties who would like to be involved in the training and socialization program.

The standardized training system consisted of curriculum and syllabus, methodology, modules, and the use of training support materials.

The creation of the system was conducted by involving related parties such as the Forestry Ministry's Center of Education and Training, Center of Environmental Standards, Association of Field Assessors, Association of Forest Entrepreneur, academic community and training institutions. A number of foreign institutions have also made their contribution in the compiling work, like GTZ, Smart Wood and SGS Forestry.

The Training that use the standardized training system involved field assessor, expert panels and the socialization of the SFM certification. Field assessor training has produced 137 assessors, while expert panel training has produced 81 candidates)rom different science disciplines (production, ecology and social).

The socialization of SFM certification was focused on the acceptance of certification by related parties in the field, such as the NGO's, local government, provincial planning agency and the public in general. With this effort the certification system shall not only be accepted by certification bodies but also by the public as an element in decision-maker by positioning their interest in forest certification process, both nationally and locally.


In addition to qualified personnel, an existing involvement of institution in certification process required a high degree of credibility. SFM certification bodies responsible to perform certification following the process of pre-assessment to deciSion-making and monitoring, should be able to show a good performance, which could be indicated by evidence of: 1) free from any conflict of interest (especially with the Forest Management Unit); 2) sufficient resources, and, 3) posses a management quality system that can assure uncorrupt conduct, and, be willing to take the implementation consequences of the certification system.

Capacity strengthening of the certification bodies institution have


I I I I I: I I I I I',' I I I I I I I I I

I

... /' ",/'

4.1.2

been included by LEI in accreditation process, in monitoring and in recurrent guidance. Another important institution in LEI system is the presence of the regional comunication forum (FKD) that comprise of local community (NGO, local people, provincial government, etc). They arethe vital parties in presenting inputs of certification in their local area.

Project ITTO PD1/95 has given a big contribution in facilitating the establishment of FKD. The biggest challenge in the operational establishment of FKD is a lack of regular funding.

To ensure the quality of personnel involved in the certification process, other institutions with function of executing the training for field assessor and expert panel were also established, called Training Institution (TI). At the same time, another institution to register and conduct competency test for assessors and expert panel, called Personnel Registration Body (PRB) was set-up. TI conducts training by using the standardized training system, while PRB conducts the recording and monitoring of every assessor and expert panel. PRB also carried-out the competency test to assure that every personnel involved in the certification process has the necessary qualifications.

Changes in inter-sectoral links which affected the Project's success

I ncreased acceptance in LEI certification system by almost all of the NGO's in Indonesia, by donor Institution like GTZ, Ford Foundation, Ministry of Forestry, Association of Forest Entrepreneur and several FSC certification bodies had strengthened the standing of LEI system. Cooperation with several of NGO's network, like Forest Watch Indonesia and FKKM has strengthened LEI in the grass root level. The Ministry of Forestry as part of the government was convinced they will carry out the reform into laws that would require LEl's involvement. The LEI certification system is judged as an ideal system to be used in the appraisal of Unit Management performance.

4.1.3 Additional arrangements that may improve the cooperation between relevant parties interested in the project

With consideration to SFM certification system development, LEI had proposed an extension of the program to the ITTO committee on Economic Information and Market Intelligence on November 1999. At the 2nd of November, 1999, the ITTO committee on CEM had agreed on an extension of six months, which would be consisted of activfties such as 1) Creation and implementation of a Chain-of-Custody training system for field assessor as required by increasing demand of COC certification 2) Design and establishment of PRB for personnel registration; and 3) Design and formation of a training institution that will provide training as required.


I I I I

I I I I',' I I I I I I I I I

I

4.1.2

been included by LEI in accreditation process, in monitoring and in recurrent guidance. Another important institution in LEI system is the presence of the regional comunication forum (FKD) that comprise of local community (NGO, local people, provincial government, etc). They arethe vital parties in presenting inputs of certification in their local area.

Project ITTO PD1/95 has given a big contribution in facilitating the establishment of FKD. The biggest challenge in the operational establishment of FKD is a lack of regular funding.

To ensure the quality of personnel involved in the certification process, other institutions with function of executing the training for field assessor and expert panel were also established, called Training Institution (TI). At the same time, another institution to register and conduct competency test for assessors and expert panel, called Personnel Registration Body (PRB) was set-up. TI conducts training by using the standardized training system, while PRB conducts the recording and monitoring of every assessor and expert panel. PRB also carried-out the competency test to assure that every personnel involved in the certification process has the necessary qualifications.

Changes in inter-sectoral links which affected the Project's success

I ncreased acceptance in LEI certification system by almost all of the NGO's in Indonesia, by donor Institution like GTZ, Ford Foundation, Ministry of Forestry, Association of Forest Entrepreneur and several FSC certification bodies had strengthened the standing of LEI system. Cooperation with several of NGO's network, like Forest Watch Indonesia and FKKM has strengthened LEI in the grass root level. The Ministry of Forestry as part of the government was convinced they will carry out the reform into laws that would require LEl's involvement. The LEI certification system is judged as an ideal system to be used in the appraisal of Unit Management performance.

4.1.3 Additional arrangements that may improve the cooperation between relevant parties interested in the project

With consideration to SFM certification system development, LEI had proposed an extension of the program to the ITTO committee on Economic Information and Market Intelligence on November 1999. At the 2nd of November, 1999, the ITTO committee on CEM had agreed on an extension of six months, which would be consisted of activfties such as 1) Creation and implementation of a Chain-of-Custody training system for field assessor as required by increasing demand of COC certification 2) Design and establishment of PRB for personnel registration; and 3) Design and formation of a training institution that will provide training as required.


I I I /,~\-~

Ic~C

I I';

.,-.":

I'~"""~""'"

..

I";j,'

','

I " 1

'/"/'/:"

I I ; , .

I I

I J

I I I I I

/" "

1/ 4.1.4 Factors which were most likely would affect Project sustainability after its completion

The SFM certification as developed by LEI has received a place in the stakeholders' society, and in addition the buyers group like B&Q has acknowledged the credibility of LEI certification. The atmosphere has made a positive impact, especially on forest managers in their expectation of promoting recognition by attainment of certificate.

Outputs from the Project ITTO PD1/95 with focus on development of human resource, were demanded by related activities, like: SFM Certification Bodies, Government and during the establishment of FKD at the local level. In expecting the coming government regulation on regional autonomy and decentralization, it has been considered to use the LEI-SFM standards as the basis for local standard development.

The lack of understanding among policy implementers in the provincial area and policy makers in the central government on how to manage sustainable forest correctly, has increased the role of the LEI system in the future.

4.2. Operational Lessons


Since the signing of ITTO and LEI agreement on February 6, 1998, the Project ITTO PD1/95 was ran by the project an executing agency (PEA), the LEI. To control and monitor the project, a Project Steering Committee (PSC), headed by Prof. Emil Salim (Head of LEI's Board of Trustee), cochaired by DR. Untung Iskandar, Director of FORDA, formerly Director of Bureau International Cooperation and Investment, MOFEC was established. The member of FSC consist of ITTO Representatives (Dr. Amha Bin Buang), Dr. Benny H Sormin, Ir Upik Djalins Tobing, Ir Waiter Nadapdap (MOFEC), Ir. Oesman Yoesoef, Ir. Hardjono, Counselor for Agriculture Nature Management and Fisheries in Indonesia and Philippine, Royal Netherlands Embassy and Agricultural attache from the Japan Embassy.

The Duty of the PSC is to monitor the progress of the Project and providing advise and input on how to increase the quality of the Project. PSC meeting is conducted two times a year. In its activity, the PEA has involved numerous parties to compile and refine the certification system, training system for assessors and expert panels, training systems for trainers and FKD. PEA has explicitly hired experts with backgrounds in forest management, ecology and social, for initial design and formulation of inputs given by the stakeholders to finalize the LEI system as part of the project output in ITTO PD1/95.

In addition to the experts above, LEI has also involved other parties, like experts in the field of training and the government officials, to give enlightment from the policy side.


I I I /,~\-~

I~:

I

',-.":

I·~······~·······

'.

~ J:,:.-~->'

1·<.··.', '.'

. .

I I····'.'··.·.··· "'

/~,

I:

I ,. -, . , .

I I

I I I I I

4.1.4 Factors which were most likely would affect Project sustainability after its completion

The SFM certification as developed by LEI has received a place in the stakeholders' society, and in addition the buyers group like B&Q has acknowledged the credibility of LEI certification. The atmosphere has made a positive impact, especially on forest managers in their expectation of promoting recognition by attainment of certificate.

Outputs from the Project ITTO PD1/95 with focus on development of human resource, were demanded by related activities, like: SFM Certification Bodies, Government and during the establishment of FKD at the local level. In expecting the coming government regulation on regional autonomy and decentralization, it has been considered to use the LEI-SFM standards as the basis for local standard development.

The lack of understanding among policy implementers in the provincial area and policy makers in the central government on how to manage sustainable forest correctly, has increased the role of the LEI system in the future .

4.2. Operational Lessons


Since the signing of ITTO and LEI agreement on February 6, 1998, the Project ITTO PD1/95 was ran by the project an executing agency (PEA), the LEI. To control and monitor the project, a Project Steering Committee (PSC), headed by Prof. Emil Salim (Head of LEI's Board of Trustee), cochaired by DR. Untung Iskandar, Director of FORDA, formerly Director of Bureau I nternational Cooperation and Investment, MOFEC was established. The member of FSC consist of ITTO Representatives (Dr. Amha Bin Buang), Dr. Benny H Sormin, Ir Upik Djalins Tobing, Ir Waiter Nadapdap (MOFEC), Ir. Oesman Yoesoef, Ir. Hardjono, Counselor for Agriculture Nature Management and Fisheries in Indonesia and Philippine, Royal Netherlands Embassy and Agricultural attache from the Japan Embassy.

The Duty of the PSC is to monitor the progress of the Project and providing advise and input on how to increase the quality of the Project. PSC meeting is conducted two times a year. In its activity, the PEA has involved numerous parties to compile and refine the certification system, training system for assessors and expert panels, training systems for trainers and FKD. PEA has explicitly hired experts with backgrounds in forest management, ecology and social, for initial design and formulation of inputs given by the stakeholders to finalize the LEI system as part of the project output in ITTO PD1/95.

In addition to the experts above, LEI has also involved other parties, like experts in the field of training and the government officials, to give enlightment from the policy side.


I I I. :::.,"';

.' j!~'.-~

I I i I I I ('"

I I .~.'-

I I I I I I I I

",.~/'. 4.2.2 Project Documentation

Project documentation consists of:

a. Administrative document includes Project Document, Agreement, MOU, Workplan, Minutes of Project Steering Committee meeting, and correspondences;

b. Technical Reports, Seminar or Workshop conclusion;

c. Quarterly and Annual progress reports. These reports adopted the ITTO Manual for Project Monitoring, Review and Evaluation format ( ITTO, 1999);

d. Training system for Assessor (LEI Guide 99-11);

e. Training system for Expert panel (LEI Guide 99-12);

f. Training System for the Trainers (LEI Guide 99-13);

g. General Requirements for Training Institution (LEI Guide 99-14);

h. General Requirements for Personal Registration Body (LEI Guide 99-15);

i. Training System for Chain-of-Custody's Assessor (LEI Guide 88-11);

j. Modules for Assessor's Training;

k. Modules for Expert Panel's Training;

I. Modules for Training of Trainer;

m. Modules for CoC Assessor Training;

n. Completion Report, the final report which comprehensively describe the overall project execution; and

o. Audit Report, the financial statement audited by registered public accountant.

4.2.3 Monitoring and Evaluation; Quality of Project Planning

The activity of monitoring and evaluation of the ITTO PD1/95 was conducted through Project administrative evaluation by studying documents and records of activities process, financial auditing, reporting, and PSC meetings.

Mr. Amha bin Buang, checked and provided constructive inputs while visiting the secretariat of the Project actively, so the Project was confident to remain on the same track. In the PSC meeting, there was a detailed presentation concerning the progress that has been achieved, where then PSC proposed the extension of the Project without further funding, with more focus on the project's result. In the financial aspect, the Project was audited by an independent external auditor.

The implementation of the Project did not vary very much from the original planning, as supported by the fact that almost all of the activities have


I

I I I

I I I I I I I

4.2.2 Project Documentation

Project documentation consists of:

a. Administrative document includes Project Document, Agreement, MOU, Workplan, Minutes of Project Steering Committee meeting, and correspondences;

b. Technical Reports, Seminar or Workshop conclusion;

c. Quarterly and Annual progress reports. These reports adopted the ITTO Manual for Project Monitoring, Review and Evaluation format ( ITTO, 1999);

d. Training system for Assessor (LEI Guide 99-11);

e. Training system for Expert panel (LEI Guide 99-12);

f. Training System for the Trainers (LEI Guide 99-13);

g. General Requirements for Training Institution (LEI Guide 99-14);

h. General Requirements for Personal Registration Body (LEI Guide 99-15);

i. Training System for Chain-of-Custody's Assessor (LEI Guide 88-11);

j. Modules for Assessor's Training;

k. Modules for Expert Panel's Training;

I. Modules for Training of Trainer;

m. Modules for CoC Assessor Training;

n. Completion Report, the final report which comprehensively describe the overall project execution; and

o. Audit Report, the financial statement audited by registered public accountant.

4.2.3 Monitoring and Evaluation; Quality of Project Planning

The activity of monitoring and evaluation of the ITTO PD1/95 was conducted through Project administrative evaluation by studying documents and records of activities process, financial auditing, reporting, and PSC meetings.

Mr. Amha bin Buang, checked and provided constructive inputs while visiting the secretariat of the Project actively, so the Project was confident to remain on the same track. In the PSC meeting, there was a detailed presentation concerning the progress that has been achieved, where then PSC proposed the extension of the Project without further funding, with more focus on the project's result. In the financial aspect, the Project was audited by an independent external auditor.

The implementation of the Project did not vary very much from the original planning, as supported by the fact that almost all of the activities have



/;;-l

been smoothly completed. The activities that did not run smoothly were mostly caused by external factors, for example, the establishment of the PRB which was quite slow by reasons of lack of interest from the public and under-qualified applicants for accreditation.

4.2.4 Definition of roles and responsibility of the institution involved in the Project implementation

Roles and responsibilities of the institutions involved were as follows:

1. As fund provider ITTO has a role to monitor and evaluate the project execution;

2. As the executing agency, LEI is responsible for the project execution;

3. MOFEC (in particular, Center for Human Resource Training), was the government institution that has to make the contribution in the creation of the training system;

4. Academic community from various Universities and institution, for example: IPB, UGM, UNMUL, also gave their contributions;

5. Participation in the compilation of a training system for the regional consultation forum by NGO's such as: Yayasan Telapak and Forest Watch Indonesia;

6. Experienced manpower to enrich the training system for SFM certification assessor that have been provided by APHI or the Indonesian Forest Entrepreneur Association; and

7. Expertise in the field of certification and training system, which were possessed by various individuals.

4.2.5 Actions conducted to avoid misinterpretation of activities between the planned and the actual implementation (schedule, cost, etc)

a. Conducting the PSC, PEA, and in-house experts meeting regularly;

b. Fulfilling the workplan for each output and activities in order of achieving the project objectives successfully;

c. Maintaining communication with scientists and in-house experts in data and information analysis;

d. Analyzing and writing regular report;

e. Frequent consultation with the Assistant Director of Economic Information and Market Intelligence of ITTO

f. Cost-effective in implementing the project.



been smoothly completed. The activities that did not run smoothly were mostly caused by external factors, for example, the establishment of the PRB which was quite slow by reasons of lack of interest from the public and under-qualified applicants for accreditation.

4.2.4 Definition of roles and responsibility of the institution involved in the Project implementation

Roles and responsibilities of the institutions involved were as follows:

1. As fund provider ITTO has a role to monitor and evaluate the project execution;

2. As the executing agency, LEI is responsible for the project execution;

3. MOFEC (in particular, Center for Human Resource Training), was the government institution that has to make the contribution in the creation of the training system;

4. Academic community from various Universities and institution, for example: IPB, UGM, UNMUL, also gave their contributions;

5. Participation in the compilation of a training system for the regional consultation forum by NGO's such as: Yayasan Telapak and Forest Watch Indonesia;

6. Experienced manpower to enrich the training system for SFM certification assessor that have been provided by APHI or the Indonesian Forest Entrepreneur Association; and

7. Expertise in the field of certification and training system, which were possessed by various individuals.

4.2.5 Actions conducted to avoid misinterpretation of activities between the planned and the actual implementation (schedule, cost, etc)

a. Conducting the PSC, PEA, and in-house experts meeting regularly;

b. Fulfilling the workplan for each output and activities in order of achieving the project objectives successfully;

c. Maintaining communication with scientists and in-house experts in data and information analysis;

d. Analyzing and writing regular report;

e. Frequent consultation with the Assistant Director of Economic Information and Market Intelligence of ITTO

f. Cost-effective in implementing the project.


I I I I I I I I I I I I I IJ

IJ

I ~

li 1.1

IJ

/1/"

4.2.6 Internal factors influenced the Project's implementation that have not been anticipate

a. Delayed third installment.

b. Shortfall of funds of the third inslallment

b. Restructuring of LEI's organization.

4.2.7 External factors influenced the Project's implementation that have not been anticipate

a. Political situation.

b. Government regulations, especially the Accreditation Scheme issued by Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN) - National Standardization Body.

1. Improving communication and cooperation among stakeholders involved in this Project and continue to do so throughout the execution.

2. Better consolidation within the executing agency to minimize the problems caused by internal factors.

3. Increased efforts of maintaining the collaboration with the MOFEC, as one of the major partner of the Project.

4. Came to a better terms with the National Accreditation Body or BSN to limit their issuance of contradictory regulations.

5. Intensified consultation with the ITTO secretariat to avoid setbacks caused by delays in the final installment.

6. Developed alternative plans for training program and to implement the plans parallel to training needs identification as found through training needs assessment.


I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11

11

I ~

11

IJ

IJ

4.2.6 Internal factors influenced the Project's implementation that have not been anticipate

a. Delayed third installment.

b. Shortfall of funds of the third installment

b. Restructuring of LEI's organization.

4.2.7 External factors influenced the Project's implementation that have not been anticipate

a. Political situation.

b. Government regulations, especially the Accreditation Scheme issued by Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN) - National Standardization Body.

1. Improving communication and cooperation among stakeholders involved in this Project and continue to do so throughout the execution.

2. Better consolidation within the executing agency to minimize the problems caused by internal factors.

3. Increased efforts of maintaining the collaboration with the MOFEC, as one of the major partner of the Project.

4. Came to a better terms with the National Accreditation Body or BSN to limit their issuance of contradictory regulations.

5. Intensified consultation with the ITTO secretariat to avoid setbacks caused by delays in the final installment.

6. Developed alternative plans for training program and to implement the plans parallel to training needs identification as found through training needs assessment.


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m

n

,(,-t

PART 11 MAIN TEXT

1.1 Project description The Project focused its efforts on the implementation of training and capacity building for personnel involved in SFM in Indonesia. Those were done through a series of organized activities in-line with the SFM certification system that LEI has designed through a multistakeholder process. The LEI-SFM national initiative was widely based among others on the ITTO criteria and indicators. As practical implementation requires skillful and knowledgeable personnel in the field, a specific training program for assessment and expert panel was required to conduct the assessment and decision-making in SFM certification. This Project has two major components to answer this need:

1. To develop the assessor's capability in field inspection for sustainable forest management.

2. To strengthen the institutional capacity in order to assure the implementation of sustainable forest management certification.

Component 1: Development oft human resource as required for the field assessment of sustainable forest management

The activities in this component were generalized into the following:

1. Improvement and establishment of data collection and analysis method for SFM criteria and indicators;

2. Standardized training curriculum and materials on the assessment of SFM;


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ..

1.1 Project description

PART 11 MAIN TEXT

The Project focused its efforts on the implementation of training and capacity building for personnel involved in SFM in Indonesia. Those were done through a series of organized activities in-line with the SFM certification system that LEI has designed through a multistakeholder process. The LEI-SFM national initiative was widely based among others on the ITTO criteria and indicators. As practical implementation requires skillful and knowledgeable personnel in the field, a specific training program for assessment and expert panel was required to conduct the assessment and decision-making in SFM certification. This Project has two major components to answer this need:

1. To develop the assessor's capability in field inspection for sustainable forest management.

2. To strengthen the institutional capacity in order to assure the implementation of sustainable forest management certification.

Component 1: Development oft human resource as required for the field assess-ment of sustainable forest management ..


1. Improvement and establishment of data collection and analysis method for SFM criteria and indicators;

2. Standardized training curriculum and materials on the assessment of SFM;



/ #" 3. Improvement in assessor firms and individuals capability for field in

spections.



1. Standardized Manuals for Expert Panel;

2. Improvement of the expertise in assessing the SFM;

3. Increasing the availability of independent and reliable information on SFM;

4. Improvement of knowledge and awareness on SFM for all stakeholders;

5. Expanded network of Regional Communication Forum on SFM.


The Project's activity was centered on the acceleration of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia by providing of training and capacity building for personnel involved in SFM. The activity was interrelated with SFM certification system designed by LEI through multistakeholder' process. The LEI SFM national initiative was mainly based on the ITTO criteria and indicators. Since the practical implementation required skillful and knowledgeable personnel in the field, a specific training for assessment and expert panel was considered necessary on how to conduct assessment and decision-making in SFM certification.


The Project has two specific objectives developed by LEI:

1. To developed the assessor's capability in the field inspection for Sustainable Forest Management

The Project had conducted activities in upgrading methods and application for data collection and analysis to determine Criteria & Indicators and formulation of standardized training materials for SFM assessment and trainings for the assessors in SFM assessment

2. To strenghten the institutional capacity for SFM assurance

The Project has been improving the ability of the expert' panels by created standardized manual for expert panel, conducted training workshops and applying those materials to increase the ability of forest assessment, followed by providing of reliable information on Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia. There are also other activities such as improvement on knowledge and awareness about Sustainable Forest Management for all of the stakeholders and the establishment in the network regarding national standardization system for Sustainable Forest Management.



3. Improvement in assessor firms and individuals capability for field inspections.



1. Standardized Manuals for Expert Panel;

2. Improvement of the expertise in assessing the SFM;

3. Increasing the availability of independent and reliable information on SFM;

4. Improvement of knowledge and awareness on SFM for all stakeholders;

5. Expanded network of Regional Communication Forum on SFM.


The Project's activity was centered on the acceleration of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia by providing of training and capacity building for personnel involved in SFM. The activity was interrelated with SFM certification system designed by LEI through multistakeholder' process. The LEI SFM national initiative was mainly based on the ITTO criteria and indicators. Since the practical implementation required skillful and knowledgeable personnel in the field, a specific training for assessment and expert panel was considered necessary on how to conduct assessment and decision-making in SFM certification.


The Project has two specific objectives developed by LEI:

1. To developed the assessor's capability in the field inspection for Sustainable Forest Management

The Project had conducted activities in upgrading methods and application for data collection and analysis to determine Criteria & Indicators and formulation of standardized training materials for SFM assessment and trainings for the assessors in SFM assessment

2. To strenghten the institutional capacity for SFM assurance

The Project has been improving the ability of the expert' panels by created standardized manual for expert panel, conducted training workshops and applying those materials to increase the ability of forest assessment, followed by providing of reliable information on Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia. There are also other activities such as improvement on knowledge and awareness about Sustainable Forest Management for all of the stakeholders and the establishment in the network regarding national standardization system for Sustainable Forest Management.


I I I ,-',.

I I I f<

I :',

I I I I I I I I I I I I f

/ .J'



1. To increase the capability of assessor in the SFM assessment as required by each field.

2. To design acceptable SFM criteria, training curriculum and materials.

3. To provide a pool of trained trainers and assessors.

Specific Objectives 11

1. To design an acceptable manual accepted for the expert panel.

2. Provide a pool of qualified experts.

3. Study information material that has been decimated.

4. To upgrade the Stakeholders awareness.

5. Establish the network on national standardized system for Sustainable Forest Management.


Development of training for the certification of sustainable forest management had been executed by LEI in close collaboration with the major stakeholders in SFM. This included the Ministry of Forestry, prominent NGO's , Association of Forest Concession Holder, academic and education institutes. Through out the project, indigenous communities, local officials and NGO's were also involved in the regional consultation forum actively on subject of certification process. The project is conducted by a project manager and an assistant project manager, whose appointment was endorsed by the ITTO project Steering Committee. In-house, local, and some foreign experts were utilized to develop and compile the standardized training systems. Several local staff were engaged with the running of technical aspects of the project.


Project Agreement between The Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute and ITTO for the implementation of Project PD 1/95 Rev. 4(M) was signed February 6, 1998. The project workplan was discussed in a series of meetings and was approved by the Project Steering Committee members.

Component 1: Development of human resource for the field assessment of sustainable forest management

The activities in the development of human resource for the field assess-


I I I ,-',.

I I

I I I I I

I I I f



1. To increase the capability of assessor in the SFM assessment as required by each field.

2. To design acceptable SFM criteria, training curriculum and materials.

3. To provide a pool of trained trainers and assessors.

Specific Objectives 11

1. To design an acceptable manual accepted for the expert panel.

2. Provide a pool of qualified experts.

3. Study information material that has been decimated.

4. To upgrade the Stakeholders awareness.

5. Establish the network on national standardized system for Sustainable Forest Management.


Development of training for the certification of sustainable forest management had been executed by LEI in close collaboration with the major stakeholders in SFM. This included the Ministry of Forestry, prominent NGO's , Association of Forest Concession Holder, academic and education institutes. Through out the project, indigenous communities, local officials and NGO's were also involved in the regional consultation forum actively on subject of certification process. The project is conducted by a project manager and an assistant project manager, whose appointment was endorsed by the ITTO project Steering Committee. In-house, local, and some foreign experts were utilized to develop and compile the standardized training systems. Several local staff were engaged with the running of technical aspects of the project.

U I


Project Agreement between The Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute and ITTO for the implementation of Project PD 1/95 Rev. 4(M) was signed February 6, 1998. The project workplan was discussed in a series of meetings and was approved by the Project Steering Committee members.

Component 1: Development of human resource for the field assessment of sustainable forest management

The activities in the development of human resource for the field assess-


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I li I:

I 1I

" .i p'

ment in sustainable forest management, were:

1. Provisions of technical assistance for the working group in data collection and analysis method based on Sustainable Forest Management criteria and indicators as an initial input for the training materials were provided.

2. Seminars and workshops as an assessment of the method's applicability in training purposes were conducted.

3. Curriculum development design as based on criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Indonesia was made.

4. Development of training material for the field inspection of Sustainable Forest Management was made.

5. Initial testing of curriculum and material for assessor trainings was performed.

6. Evaluation and refinement of training materials and curriculum was completed.

7. Scheduling and identification of potential trainers to be involved in the training of the trainers were completed.

8. Implementation of training for the trainers was conducted.

9. Establishment of training system was completed.


The activities on institutional capacity building, were:

1. Development of manuals for expert panels to be used in the evaluation and assessment of field inspections reports conducted by the assessors, as well as system and decision-making process of certification.

2. Curriculum development of training for the experts using the manuals was completed.

3. Initial testing of curriculum and manuals was performed.

4. Evaluation and refinements of curriculum and manuals were completed.

5. Establishment of decision-making process in assessing SFM was completed.

6. Scheduling and identification of potential experts to be involved in the Sustainable Forest management assessment report were completed.

7. Implementation of training workshop for potential expert panel members was completed.

8. Establishment of expert-panel recruitment system was completed.

9. Preparation, provision and distribution of information kit on Sustain-



I

.i p'

ment in sustainable forest management, were:

1. Provisions of technical assistance for the working group in data collection and analysis method based on Sustainable Forest Management criteria and indicators as an initial input for the training materials were provided.

2. Seminars and workshops as an assessment of the method's applicability in training purposes were conducted.

3. Curriculum development design as based on criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Indonesia was made.

4. Development of training material for the field inspection of Sustainable Forest Management was made.

5. Initial testing of curriculum and material for assessor trainings was performed.

6. Evaluation and refinement of training materials and curriculum was completed.

7. Scheduling and identification of potential trainers to be involved in the training of the trainers were completed.

8. Implementation of training for the trainers was conducted.

9. Establishment of training system was completed.


The activities on institutional capacity building, were:

1. Development of manuals for expert panels to be used in the evaluation and assessment of field inspections reports conducted by the assessors, as well as system and decision-making process of certification.

2. Curriculum development of training for the experts using the manuals was completed.

3. Initial testing of curriculum and manuals was performed.

4. Evaluation and refinements of curriculum and manuals were completed.

5. Establishment of decision-making process in assessing SFM was completed.

6. Scheduling and identification of potential experts to be involved in the Sustainable Forest management assessment report were completed.

7. Implementation of training workshop for potential expert panel members was completed.

8. Establishment of expert-panel recruitment system was completed.

9. Preparation, provision and distribution of information kit on Sustain-


I I I·.·'."··:.···· . '

.... " J_

1/> I, I: If

'_,l>;'c"

-.",-.;.'.' "

I'·····i :... ~- , '

,".' "

'-,-~.-::~'.(-:

I' I,

I' I I' I I I I I I I

/

" .' able Forest Management and the certification process were completed .

10. Publishing an information Kit

11. Workshop for concessionaires on Sustainable Forest Management and certification process were conducted.

12. Public Seminars and discussions involving relevant government institutions were conducted,

13. Workshop for the stakeholders to establish the network of SFM were conducted.

14. Establishment of database on Sustainable Forest Management and certification was completed.

15. International linkage establishment and comparative study on certification was completed.

1. 7 Required Inputs

The project of Training Development on the Certification of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia required a certain funds as below:

.,~~?,f\l;t¥!;:,~(!~~(%~~,,~"~~~~!~·~~je~tPOiri.Pbn~rt{::;:~~;~,t iq.·':' •• -

;I1TO(US$)/," :,\_,~:~, ~~ ~:" '~~:;;~:I'::-'~-:- ~-,;, :~, ..

1. Project Personnel 263,953.85

2. Sub-contracts 42,576.39

3. Duty Travel 75,060,00

4. Capital Item 42,567.88

5. Consumable Item 121,127,00

6. Miscellaneous 58,386.00

7. ITTO Monitoring & Evaluation 55,074,00

Total 658,744.53

The actual funds used in the project differs from the originally agreed of $ 672.774.00 due to a shortfall in the funds received for the third and final installment of $ 10,542.00, Component of ITTO Monitoring & Evaluation was used by ITTO and its dibursement was not via LE!. At the end of the project the balance is US$ 4,124.42


I I

-.'-.

I, .:.. .... " J_

I,~~> I;

I I I I I I

/

" .' able Forest Management and the certification process were completed .

10, Publishing an information Kit

11. Workshop for concessionaires on Sustainable Forest Management and certification process were conducted.

12. Public Seminars and discussions involving relevant government institutions were conducted,

13. Workshop for the stakeholders to establish the network of SFM were conducted.

14. Establishment of database on Sustainable Forest Management and certification was completed.

15. International linkage establishment and comparative study on certification was completed.

1. 7 Required Inputs

The project of Training Development on the Certification of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia required a certain funds as below:

,\ , ... ' ;1J:TO'(~s.$)f' "" i':""',':~>'i:.:>:·:--' ':<",' :.'

1. Project Personnel 263,953.85

2. Sub-contracts 42,576.39

3. Duty Travel 75,060,00

4. Capital Item 42,567.88

5. Consumable Item 121,127,00

6. Miscellaneous 58,386.00

7. ITTO Monitoring & Evaluation 55,074,00

I Total 658,744.53

The actual funds used in the project differs from the originally agreed of $ 672.774.00 due to a shortfall in the funds received for the third and final installment of $ 10,542.00, Component of ITTO Monitoring & Evaluation was used by ITTO and its dibursement was not via LE!. At the end of the project the balance is US$ 4,124.42


I I

., ~

i I I·· I' " ..

I i ~{/

I I :~. ~~~:

I ,.~~:

I I I I I I I I I

.1' .'

1.8 Project Rationale Indonesia is a country with an area of 60 million hectares of forest area. A country with population of 200 million people, within where, millions of people directly or indirectly are working in the forestry sector. As one of the major contributor in Indonesia's economy and partly, due to its role as non-oil export revenue, SFM is readily in the best interest of the country. Compounded by the fact of increasing environmental orientation in Indonesia's wood products buyers, western Europe in particular, demand for certified wood has also risen.

As the need for SFM certification becomes increasingly pressing, many obstacles for the implementation of SFM certification in Indonesia must be addressed. Among them, was the unavailability of qualified personals to conduct the assessment and decision-making process. This was a major constraint that could be answered through training and capacity enhancement of the institutes. And, since the nature of SFM certification is very specific as well as the use of LEI criteria and indicators in the field in regard of technical and practical application, this type of training program has never been perform in Indonesia before. Judged by that aspect, this project was actually very significant, since it provided necessary input to establish a training system and conduct the training itself.

Also, it must be realized that persons trained will not necessarily work directly related to the certification process. As many are working in forest management unit and would most likely be invaluable preperation to adopting SFM through a verification of the third party.

1. 9 Relevant Background Information

The Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute (LEI) was first established in 1994, as a working group led by Prof. Dr. Emil Salim. Until mid-1998, the group had been working to prepare the implementation of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) certification. The preparation stage involved development of criteria and indicators for SFM, an assessment system, decision-making tools, and capacity building for all stakeholders involved in the certification process. LEl's SFM Certification System, including its C&I, was developed with reference to SFM's principles and criteria of the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), as well as the environmental management system developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

In June 1994, the result of Sustainable Forest Management prepared by the working group was tested in the three concession areas of Riau, East Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan. In 1996, the test resulted in a widely approved certification system for sustainable natural forest management. The system was consisted of:

a. Procedures for certification of natural production forest management;

b. Logical framework for evaluation of production forest management;

c. Procedure of decision-making with Analytic Hierarchy Process;

d. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management;

e. Chain-of-Custody.


I I·

., ~

I I I·· i' " ..

I I ~{/

• i ~~.

I I I I I I

.1' .'

1.8 Project Rationale Indonesia is a country with an area of 60 million hectares of forest area. A country with population of 200 million people, within where, millions of people directly or indirectly are working in the forestry sector. As one of the major contributor in Indonesia's economy and partly, due to its role as non-oil export revenue, SFM is readily in the best interest of the country. Compounded by the fact of increasing environmental orientation in Indonesia's wood products buyers, western Europe in particular, demand for certified wood has also risen.

As the need for SFM certification becomes increasingly pressing, many obstacles for the implementation of SFM certification in Indonesia must be addressed. Among them, was the unavailability of qualified personals to conduct the assessment and decision-making process. This was a major constraint that could be answered through training and capacity enhancement of the institutes. And, since the nature of SFM certification is very specific as well as the use of LEI criteria and indicators in the field in regard of technical and practical application, this type of training program has never been perform in Indonesia before. Judged by that aspect, this project was actually very significant, since it provided necessary input to establish a training system and conduct the training itself .

Also, it must be realized that persons trained will not necessarily work directly related to the certification process. As many are working in forest management unit and would most likely be invaluable preperation to adopting SFM through a verification of the third party.

1. 9 Relevant Background Information

The Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute (LEI) was first established in 1994, as a working group led by Prof. Dr. Emil Salim. Until mid-1998, the group had been working to prepare the implementation of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) certification. The preparation stage involved development of criteria and indicators for SFM, an assessment system, decision-making tools, and capacity building for all stakeholders involved in the certification process. LEl's SFM Certification System, including its C&I, was developed with reference to SFM's principles and criteria of the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), as well as the environmental management system developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

In June 1994, the result of Sustainable Forest Management prepared by the working group was tested in the three concession areas of Riau, East Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan. In 1996, the test resulted in a widely approved certification system for sustainable natural forest management. The system was consisted of:

a. Procedures for certification of natural production forest management;

b. Logical framework for evaluation of production forest management;

c. Procedure of decision-making with Analytic Hierarchy Process;

d. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management;

e. Chain-of-Custody.


I I I 1,

I --!:

I ,'--,

I I I I I

',.-

I I I I I I I I I I

/ /

On February 6, 1998, LEI was officially established as a non-profit legal entity. In June 1998, the National Standardization Body of Indonesia has officially adopted the SFM Certification System for production forests, developed by LEI together with the forestry stakeholders.

The acceptance has met LEl's vision to become an independent, constituent-based institution whose main objective was to ensure a sustainable natural resources and environmental management through the application of credible ecolabelling certification system.

LEI's missions were:

(a) To develop a credible certification system of sustainable natural resources and environmental management;

(b) To develop an accreditation system as a check-and-balance control mechanism to ensure the implementation of the above certification system;

(c) To develop institutional and human resource factor meant as an action of achieving capacity building to support the implementation of ecolabelling certification system;

(d) To supervise the implementation of the above certification system;

(e) To encourage the development and adoption of policy measures in promoting sustainable management of natural resources and environment.

Currently, LEI has four accredited Certification Bodies and one accredited independent training institution implementing the LEI-SFM certification system in Indonesia.

1.10 Project Location The project was not conducted in any particular designated area. The training and workshops were conducted in Bogor, Jakarta, Cangkuang and Sukabumi. The field works were performed in Perum Perhutani KPH Sukabumi, Barito Pacific Timber IFA Jamb. Regional consultation forums were also conducted in Riau, North Sulawesi, South-East Sulawesi, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, Northern Sumatera Central Kalimantan, and MalukuIrian Jaya.

1.11 Preliminary Activities The criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management as prepared by the LEI working group had undergone a number of rigorous consultative process preceding it's acceptance by major stakeholders, among them were:

Brainstorming sessions with experts and members of various stakeholders institutions, development of the initial draft on criteria and indicators for Sustainable Forest Management, field test in three locations, first drafted document on evaluation and development of criteria and indicators on sustainable forest management.


I I I 1,

I --!:

I ,'--,

I I I I I

',.-.

I I I I I I I I I I

/

On February 6, 1998, LEI was officially established as a non-profit legal entity. In June 1998, the National Standardization Body of Indonesia has officially adopted the SFM Certification System for production forests, developed by LEI together with the forestry stakeholders.

The acceptance has met LEl's vision to become an independent, constituent-based institution whose main objective was to ensure a sustainable natural resources and environmental management through the application of credible ecolabelling certification system.

LEI's missions were:

(a) To develop a credible certification system of sustainable natural resources and environmental management;

(b) To develop an accreditation system as a check-and-balance control mechanism to ensure the implementation of the above certification system;

(c) To develop institutional and human resource factor meant as an action of achieving capacity building to support the implementation of ecolabelling certification system;

(d) To supervise the implementation of the above certification system;

(e) To encourage the development and adoption of policy measures in promoting sustainable management of natural resources and environment.

Currently, LEI has four accredited Certification Bodies and one accredited independent training institution implementing the LEI-SFM certification system in Indonesia.

-1.10 Project Location The project was not conducted in any particular designated area. The training and workshops were conducted in Bogor, Jakarta, Cangkuang and Sukabumi. The field works were performed in Perum Perhutani KPH Sukabumi, Barito Pacific Timber IFA Jamb. Regional consultation forums were also conducted in Riau, North Sulawesi, South-East Sulawesi, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, Northern Sumatera Central Kalimantan, and MalukuIrian Jaya.

1.11 Preliminary Activities The criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management as prepared by the LEI working group had undergone a number of rigorous consultative process preceding it's acceptance by major stakeholders, among them were:

Brainstorming sessions with experts and members of various stakeholders institutions, development of the initial draft on criteria and indicators for Sustainable Forest Management, field test in three locations, first drafted document on evaluation and development of criteria and indicators on sustainable forest management.



1.12 The 1TTO Context 1. Compliance with the ITTA 1994 Objectives

Development objectives of the project were in full accordance with the concerns of ITTO and the objectives of ITTA 1994. The project has greatly promoted the implementation of sustainable forest management certification. This in turn, will be a contribution to the international market, which is in need of certified tropical wood and products from Indonesia, thus increasing the value and foundation of present and future sustainable wood trading.

The project met the terms within the framework of the Economic Information and Market Intelligence committee. The activities of this project as were related to the following ITTA 1994 objectives, in particular were:

(a) Provided an effective framework for consultation, international cooperation and policy development among all members in all relevant level of the world timber economy;

(d) Enhanced capacity of the members in implementing the strategy of achieving the export of tropical timber and timber products from sustainable managed sources by the year of 2000;

(e) Promoted the expansion and diversification of international trade in tropical timber from sustainable sources, by improvement of structural conditions on international markets, with taking into account, on one hand, a long-term increase in consumption and supply continuity, and prices reflecting the costs of sustainable forest management that remunerative and equitable for members on the other hand. That was added by improvement of market access;

(h) To improve market intelligence with the aim of ensuring greater transparency in the international timber market, including the gathering, compilation and dissemination of trade related data, including data related to species being traded;

(k) To improve the marketing and distribution of tropical timber exports from sustainable managed sources;

With emphasis on the training and capacity building for the implementation of SFM certification scheme in Indonesia while also promoting the presence of certified wood in Indonesia, this project has fully complied with the objectives of ITTA 1994, explicitly and implicitly.

The specific objectives of this project were as follows:

1. To develop the assessor's capability in the field inspection for Sustainable Forest Management;

2. To strengthen the institutional capacity to assure the SFM implementation in Indonesia.

This project's results have made a contribution into the existing certified sustainable forest management in Indonesia as well as to the availability of their products for international trade.

The projects was aimed to provide necessary prerequisite by providing qualified personnel to implement SFM certification systems, compile a standardized training system for both assessor and expert panels, establish regional consultation forum, and information distribution to all the stakeholders involved.



/ l'

1.12 The 1TTO Context 1. Compliance with the ITTA 1994 Objectives

Development objectives of the project were in full accordance with the concerns of ITTO and the objectives of ITTA 1994. The project has greatly promoted the implementation of sustainable forest management certification. This in turn, will be a contribution to the international market, which is in need of certified tropical wood and products from Indonesia, thus increasing the value and foundation of present and future sustainable wood trading.

The project met the terms within the framework of the Economic Information and Market Intelligence committee. The activities of this project as were related to the following ITTA 1994 objectives, in particular were:

(a) Provided an effective framework for consultation, international cooperation and policy development among all members in all relevant level of the world timber economy;

(d) Enhanced capacity of the members in implementing the strategy of achieving the export of tropical timber and timber products from sustainable managed sources by the year of 2000;

(e) Promoted the expansion and diversification of international trade in tropical timber from sustainable sources, by improvement of structural conditions on international markets, with taking into account, on one hand, a long-term increase in consumption and supply continuity, and prices reflecting the costs of sustainable forest management that remunerative and equitable for members on the other hand. That was added by improvement of market access;

(h) To improve market intelligence with the aim of ensuring greater transparency in the international timber market, including the gathering, compilation and dissemination of trade related data, including data related to species being traded;

(k) To improve the marketing and distribution of tropical timber exports from sustainable managed sources;

With emphasis on the training and capacity building for the implementation of SFM certification scheme in Indonesia while also promoting the presence of certified wood in Indonesia, this project has fully complied with the objectives of ITTA 1994, explicitly and implicitly.

The specific objectives of this project were as follows:

1. To develop the assessor's capability in the field inspection for Sustainable Forest Management;

2. To strengthen the institutional capacity to assure the SFM implementation in Indonesia.

This project's results have made a contribution into the existing certified sustainable forest management in Indonesia as well as to the availability of their products for international trade.

The projects was aimed to provide necessary prerequisite by providing qualified personnel to implement SFM certification systems, compile a standardized training system for both assessor and expert panels, establish regional consultation forum, and information distribution to all the stakeholders involved.


I I I I I I I I lit

I, I:' I I I I I I ~

IJ 11

,f

(i1 this regard, the project has acted in accordance with seven priority actions very essential to the advancement toward the ITTO Year 2000 Objectives, they were in particular:

• To adopt a forest policy and to apply related legislation;

• To train the work force, including supervisors, on the reduction of logging impact;

• To raise the public awareness that timber harvesting should be parallel with the sustainability of tropical forests; (a continuing course of action taken by LEI that would greatly be improved when the project is implemented).


The Project was complied to the specific goals and supporting actions of the ITTO Action Plan of Year 1998 to 2000 in the Economic Information and Market Intelligence field, as portrayed below:

Goal 1. Improvement in International timber market transparency

As stated by the actions, achieving this goal included the encouragement and assistance to the members in developing manpower skills through appropriate approaches, including the ITTO Fellowship Program. The training program has produced a pool of qualified personnel as assessors and expert panels who will partake as pioneers in performing Sustainable Forest Management certification assessment. Active participation in promoting Indonesian certification initiative has been undertaken during the project's duration to establish international market confidence upon the presence of SFM certification in Indonesia.

Goal 2. Improvement in marketing and distribution of tropical timber exports from sustainable managed sources

Presently, a Significant gap between demand and availability in the international market for certified wood and products of sustainable forest management has occurred. That was due to, among other things, lack of qualified personnel to implement the SFM certification. In consequence, there were still a small number of forest management unit whose currently obtain sustainable forest management certification and the field.

With the Project, increased capacity for the implementation on sustainable forest certification in Indonesia was intended to initiate the urgency and wider implementation of certification, thus, increasing the supply of certified wood and products from Indonesia for the international market.

2.1 National and Sectoral Development Objectives The Government of Indonesia has committed to join the global effort for the conservation


I I I I I I I I I:

I I I I I

IJ I~·

t

j

,f

(i1 this regard, the project has acted in accordance with seven priority actions very essential to the advancement toward the ITTO Year 2000 Objectives, they were in particular:

• To adopt a forest policy and to apply related legislation;

• To train the work force, including supervisors, on the reduction of logging impact;

• To raise the public awareness that timber harvesting should be parallel with the sustainability of tropical forests; (a continuing course of action taken by LEI that would greatly be improved when the project is implemented).


The Project was complied to the specific goals and supporting actions of the ITTO Action Plan of Year 1998 to 2000 in the Economic Information and Market Intelligence field, as portrayed below:

Goal 1. Improvement in International timber market transparency

As stated by the actions, achieving this goal included the encouragement and assistance to the members in developing manpower skills through appropriate approaches, including the ITTO Fellowship Program. The training program has produced a pool of qualified personnel as assessors and expert panels who will partake as pioneers in performing Sustainable Forest Management certification assessment. Active participation in promoting Indonesian certification initiative has been undertaken during the project's duration to establish international market confidence upon the presence of SFM certification in Indonesia.

Goal 2. Improvement in marketing and distribution of tropical timber exports from sustainable managed sources

Presently, a Significant gap between demand and availability in the international market for certified wood and products of sustainable forest management has occurred. That was due to, among other things, lack of qualified personnel to implement the SFM certification. In consequence, there were still a small number of forest management unit whose currently obtain sustainable forest management certification and the field.

With the Project, increased capacity for the implementation on sustainable forest certification in Indonesia was intended to initiate the urgency and wider implementation of certification, thus, increasing the supply of certified wood and products from Indonesia for the international market.

2.1 National and Sectoral Development Objectives The Government of Indonesia has committed to join the global effort for the conservation


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~

~

~

IJ

./ ,?

and sustainable development of the world's forests. Indonesia's national forest policy was in line with the UNCED agreement (especially the Principles of Forest, Agenda 21, Chapter 11: Combating Deforestation, and Bio-diversity Convention), and ITTO decisions. The policies of the Ministry of Forestry, as stipulated in the Forestry Ministerial Decrees No 576/ Kpts-II/1993, and No. 610/Kpts-IV/1993, called for the implementation and enforcement following the criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management for the Indonesian Natural Production Forest. Detailed technical guidelines for those decrees has also been set up through the Directorate General of Forest Utilization Decree No. 208/Kpts/IV-Set/ 1993.

The government felt obliged to fulfill their commitment by fully implementing the SFM in the Indonesian forest, by the year of 2000. Therefore, in the early 1994 the Ministry of Forestry announced the need to establish an independent institution to implement Indonesian forest certification scheme.

Indonesia's long-term Development Plan called for human resources improvement in all sectors, including Forestry sector. The Project, which aimed to develop curricula and training materials for field assessment of sustainable forest management training program, was therefore consistent with the Indonesian Government policies.


In the Project's implementation, LEI was constantly work in close cooperation with the Ministry of Forestry, particularly to their Center of Forest Education and Center of Environmental Standards. Also with the academic community of Agriculture Institute of Bogor, University of Gadjah Mada, University of Mulawarman, NGO's; Telapak, Forest Watch Indonesia, Association of Forest Entrepreneur and individuals with qualifications in certification and forestry.

The procedure applied above was derived from some of LEI's main principles in certification process which were transparency and involvement of multi-stakeholders.

3.1 Phase of Adequate Identification The project had correctly defined the problems to be tackled, such as lack of qualified personnel, which was a real problem that had to be resolved after steps to implement actual certification in the field was decided. That was difficult since a training to implement SFM certification both as a system and in practical terms in the field has never been done before in Indonesia. The Project had to literally start from scratch, particularly on the conception of curriculum and standardization of the training manuals for trainers, assessors and expert panels. Strengthening of capacity of the relevant institutes in certification was also properly addressed.



IJ

./ ,?

and sustainable development of the world's forests. Indonesia's national forest policy was in line with the UNCED agreement (especially the Principles of Forest, Agenda 21, Chapter 11: Combating Deforestation, and Bio-diversity Convention), and ITTO decisions. The policies of the Ministry of Forestry, as stipulated in the Forestry Ministerial Decrees No 576/ Kpts-II/1993, and No. 610/Kpts-IV/1993, called for the implementation and enforcement following the criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management for the Indonesian Natural Production Forest. Detailed technical guidelines for those decrees has also been set up through the Directorate General of Forest Utilization Decree No. 208/Kpts/IV-Set/ 1993.

The government felt obliged to fulfill their commitment by fully implementing the SFM in the Indonesian forest, by the year of 2000. Therefore, in the early 1994 the Ministry of Forestry announced the need to establish an independent institution to implement Indonesian forest certification scheme.

Indonesia's long-term Development Plan called for human resources improvement in all sectors, including Forestry sector. The Project, which aimed to develop curricula and training materials for field assessment of sustainable forest management training program, was therefore consistent with the Indonesian Government policies.


In the Project's implementation, LEI was constantly work in close cooperation with the Ministry of Forestry, particularly to their Center of Forest Education and Center of Environmental Standards. Also with the academic community of Agriculture Institute of Bogor, University of Gadjah Mada, University of Mulawarman, NGO's; Telapak, Forest Watch Indonesia, Association of Forest Entrepreneur and individuals with qualifications in certification and forestry.

The procedure applied above was derived from some of LEI's main principles in certification process which were transparency and involvement of multi-stakeholders.

3.1 Phase of Adequate Identification The project had correctly defined the problems to be tackled, such as lack of qualified personnel, which was a real problem that had to be resolved after steps to implement actual certification in the field was decided. That was difficult since a training to implement SFM certification both as a system and in practical terms in the field has never been done before in Indonesia. The Project had to literally start from scratch, particularly on the conception of curriculum and standardization of the training manuals for trainers, assessors and expert panels. Strengthening of capacity of the relevant institutes in certification was also properly addressed .



" .;

3.2 Conceptual Foundation The rational of the project was clearly addressed in the Project's document, but unfortunately, some external influences have also affected the implementation of the project. The rapid change of local political situation have brought some adjustment inside our most prominent partner, MOFEC, which in turn brought some changes in the Government regulations especially that of regarding the Accreditation Scheme by Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN). This situation, added by the delay and the reduction of funds received for the third installment have created some minor postponement and, of course, brought some effects to the project's execution.


The project was initiated through various consultation of problems identification to be addressed before the actual formulation process of the Project was done. Since it was considered necessary to bring more focus on some of the outputs of the Project, an extension to 31 December 2000 was granted without any additional funding.

3.4 Acceptance and Essentiality of Roles and Responsibilities of the Institutions Involved in the Project Implementation

The roles and responsibility of the institutions involved were appropriate as they were the most relevant and suitable parties to be involved in the project. During the project's execution, it was obvious that each institution had a clear understanding and comprehension of their roles and duties.

3.5. Beneficiary Involvement in the Project's Efforts and Actions

Being the main project beneficiary, LEI was involved closely with the Project's efforts and actions. In the capacity as the executing agency, LEI has coordinated the efforts of numerous institutions and individuals who have supported the completion of this project. The academic community represented by the Agriculture Institute of Bogor, University of Gadjah Mada, and University of Mulawarman have helped to increase the scientific foundation of the project The same applied to the NGO's; such as Telapak, Forest Watch Indonesia, Walhi, WWF, and many others. Association of Forest Entrepreneur, whose members were also the forest concession companies has provided field facilities, field crew and accommodations for the training and pilot testing.



3.2 Conceptual Foundation The rational of the project was clearly addressed in the Project's document, but unfortunately, some external influences have also affected the implementation of the project. The rapid change of local political situation have brought some adjustment inside our most prominent partner, MOFEC, which in turn brought some changes in the Government regulations especially that of regarding the Accreditation Scheme by Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN). This situation, added by the delay and the reduction of funds received for the third installment have created some minor postponement and, of course, brought some effects to the project's execution.


The project was initiated through various consultation of problems identification to be addressed before the actual formulation process of the Project was done. Since it was considered necessary to bring more focus on some of the outputs of the Project, an extension to 31 December 2000 was granted without any additional funding.

3.4 Acceptance and Essentiality of Roles and Responsibilities of the Institutions Involved in the Project Implementation

The roles and responsibility of the institutions involved were appropriate as they were the most relevant and suitable parties to be involved in the project. During the project's execution, it was obvious that each institution had a clear understanding and comprehension of their roles and duties.

3.5. Beneficiary Involvement in the Project's Efforts and Actions

Being the main project beneficiary, LEI was involved closely with the Project's efforts and actions. In the capacity as the executing agency, LEI has coordinated the efforts of numerous institutions and individuals who have supported the completion of this project. The academic community represented by the Agriculture Institute of Bogor, University of Gadjah Mada, and University of Mulawarman have helped to increase the scientific foundation of the project The same applied to the NGO's; such as Telapak, Forest Watch Indonesia, Walhi, WWF, and many others. Association of Forest Entrepreneur, whose members were also the forest concession companies has provided field facilities, field crew and accommodations for the training and pilot testing.



4.1 Significant Differences between Planned and Actual Implementation

1. On Costs

There were no significant differences between the planned budget and actual project implementation. A complete audit on financial aspects of the project was scheduled following this report completion.

2. On Components

Components related to the development of assessor capability in the field assessment, the standardized training curriculum and materials were finished, followed by a series of workshops, and seminars by involving experienced individuals and institutions with high capability and know-how of preparing required materials. The parties involved were from the Institute of Agriculture Sogor, Gadjah Mada University, Ministry of Forestry, Center of Training and Education, senior assessors and practitioners. The materials produced have been tested, refined and used in numerous trainings since it's conception.

During the preparation of actual training of assessors and expert panels, training for the trainers was conducted in Jambi, with 25 participants.

Manuals for strengthening the institutional capacity for expert panels were formulated in similar approach as the curriculum and training materials. The manual produced from this process was then used in the training workshops in SFM certification for the decisionmaking expert panel. In connection to this component, information materials on SFM certification for public and SFM stakeholders distribution were conceived and decimated. It was then we realized that many stakeholders did not have a solid grasp on SFM, not to say SFM certification. With that in mind, LEI has the commitment to continue the action of information distribution to the public and to all of the SFM stakeholder. One of the efforts that has been taken was the establishment of regional forum on certification over. eight regions in Indonesia. The forum was established with an additional purpose of monitoring the certification process in their given province. In these forums, stakeholders from every side of the spectrum were invited, they were local communities, environmentalists, settlers, forest workers, politician, forest entrepreneurs, and forestry officials. Previously, chances were rare where they can sit down together and discuss the issues of SFM, that noticeably, had some effects upon them and to share their views regarding them. In general, the forum formulated and decided a common goal and practical steps that should be taken by the group to accelerate SFM. The forum may take a few days duration in deliberation and debate process, but in the end, the results were both productive and positive not just in term of improving of certification knowledge, but also in better understanding of each other's position.

3. On Schedules

During the implementation of the project, the executing agency believed a few changes in



4.1 Significant Differences between Planned and Actual Implementation

1. On Costs

There were no significant differences between the planned budget and actual project implementation. A complete audit on financial aspects of the project was scheduled following this report completion.

2. On Components

Components related to the development of assessor capability in the field assessment, the standardized training curriculum and materials were finished, followed by a series of workshops, and seminars by involving experienced individuals and institutions with high capability and know-how of preparing required materials. The parties involved were from the Institute of Agriculture Sogor, Gadjah Mada University, Ministry of Forestry, Center of Training and Education, senior assessors and practitioners. The materials produced have been tested, refined and used in numerous trainings since it's conception.

During the preparation of actual training of assessors and expert panels, training for the trainers was conducted in Jambi, with 25 participants.

Manuals for strengthening the institutional capacity for expert panels were formulated in similar approach as the curriculum and training materials. The manual produced from this process was then used in the training workshops in SFM certification for the decisionmaking expert panel. In connection to this component, information materials on SFM certification for public and SFM stakeholders distribution were conceived and decimated. It was then we realized that many stakeholders did not have a solid grasp on SFM, not to say SFM certification. With that in mind, LEI has the commitment to continue the action of information distribution to the public and to all of the SFM stakeholder. One of the efforts that has been taken was the establishment of regional forum on certification over. eight regions in Indonesia. The forum was established with an additional purpose of monitoring the certification process in their given province. In these forums, stakeholders from every side of the spectrum were invited, they were local communities, environmentalists, settlers, forest workers, politician, forest entrepreneurs, and forestry officials. Previously, chances were rare where they can sit down together and discuss the issues of SFM, that noticeably, had some effects upon them and to share their views regarding them. In general, the forum formulated and decided a common goal and practical steps that should be taken by the group to accelerate SFM. The forum may take a few days duration in deliberation and debate process, but in the end, the results were both productive and positive not just in term of improving of certification knowledge, but also in better understanding of each other's position.

3. On Schedules

During the implementation of the project, the executing agency believed a few changes in



/

the original project plan was needed as was then proposed to the Project Steering Committee meeting on September 9, 1999. The meeting agreed for an amendment in the budget with no requirement of additional funds. The proposal was then submitted and approved by the ITTO committee on Economic and Market Intelligence on their 25th session in Yokohama, Japan, November 2, 1999. The delay in the project's implementation schedule was due to the delay in the third and final fund disbursement.

4. Outputs Achievements

In general, overall accomplishment of the project has covered the expected outputs of the project as indicated below:

a. Standardized Training for Assessors and Decision-Making Panels

A standardized curriculum, syllabus, modules, and materials to be used during the conduct training for the trainers, assessors, and decision-making panels were completed. The materials was comprising of four topics that were assessed in the field: comprehensive, social, ecology and production.

b. Number of Trained Personnel

The training program of this project was consisted of training for the trainers, graduating a total of 16 trainers, training workshops for expert/decision-making panels, totaled to 81 decision making panels. Training for assessors was completed with 142 participants from different backgrounds, such as assessors, people already working in the management unit and people interested in learning more about LEI-SFM certification. Training for Chain of Custody assessor produced a total of 40 field assessors.

c. Workshops

Several workshops were organized during the duration of this project with the purpose of supporting the SFM achievement program. Relevant stakeholders of the SFM certification have attended these workshops.

d. Certification Database

Database of certification materials and related information regarding Indonesian forestry which has been collected through out the project duration may be found in the data catalogue kept in the project execution office of LE!.

e. Institutional and Network Building

Expected output after promoting of the institutional capacity of the stakeholders involved in SFM certification in Indonesia has been achieved. LEI has released a number of informative kits, which included materials coming from the grass-root level concerning the existence of SFM in Indonesia to the more advanced details of the LEI SFM certification process. This information was given freely and openly and distributed by LEI to concerned parties on a regular basis, and one of them was "The Ecolabelling News".

A total of nine Regional Consultative forum had been formed in the North Sumatra, West Papua, Celebes Islands, and Kalimantan. As mentioned before, establishment of the Regional Consultative Forum was aimed to so that this institution



/

the original project plan was needed as was then proposed to the Project Steering Committee meeting on September 9, 1999. The meeting agreed for an amendment in the budget with no requirement of additional funds. The proposal was then submitted and approved by the ITTO committee on Economic and Market Intelligence on their 25th session in Yokohama, Japan, November 2, 1999. The delay in the project's implementation schedule was due to the delay in the third and final fund disbursement.

4. Outputs Achievements

In general, overall accomplishment of the project has covered the expected outputs of the project as indicated below:

a. Standardized Training for Assessors and Decision-Making Panels

A standardized curriculum, syllabus, modules, and materials to be used during the conduct training for the trainers, assessors, and decision-making panels were completed. The materials was comprising of four topics that were assessed in the field: comprehensive, social, ecology and production.

b. Number of Trained Personnel

The training program of this project was consisted of training for the trainers, graduating a total of 16 trainers, training workshops for expert/decision-making panels, totaled to 81 decision making panels. Training for assessors was completed with 142 participants from different backgrounds, such as assessors, people already working in the management unit and people interested in learning more about LEI-SFM certification. Training for Chain of Custody assessor produced a total of 40 field assessors.

c. Workshops

Several workshops were organized during the duration of this project with the purpose of supporting the SFM achievement program. Relevant stakeholders of the SFM certification have attended these workshops.

d. Certification Database

Database of certification materials and related information regarding Indonesian forestry which has been collected through out the project duration may be found in the data catalogue kept in the project execution office of LE!.

e. Institutional and Network Building

Expected output after promoting of the institutional capacity of the stakeholders involved in SFM certification in Indonesia has been achieved. LEI has released a number of informative kits, which included materials coming from the grass-root level concerning the existence of SFM in Indonesia to the more advanced details of the LEI SFM certification process. This information was given freely and openly and distributed by LEI to concerned parties on a regular basis, and one of them was "The Ecolabelling News".

A total of nine Regional Consultative forum had been formed in the North Sumatra, West Papua, Celebes Islands, and Kalimantan. As mentioned before, establishment of the Regional Consultative Forum was aimed to so that this institution



.1"

if becomes as fundamental instrument to obtain credible information in related region scope, regarding the condition of companies or individuals applying for certification. In the future, when more authorities were delegated to provincial government, this forum will increasingly become more important in its capacity as a meeting forum for all the stakeholders of Sustainable Forest Management in their respective area. LEI also has accredited an independent training institution that will conduct the training using the standardized training materials and participated by personnel inside the SFM certification system. To monitor the performance! track records of these personnel, a system on Personnel Registration Body (PRB) has been designated and LEI was expecting an independent institution to perform this function. However, observing that there was still of lack of genuine interest from the public to perform this function, LEI has resolved to carry-out this function during their initial duration.

4.2 Measures and Steps Taken to Avoid Discrepancy 1. Improved the cooperation with some of the related stakeholders during the

implementation;

2. Intensified the understanding on fund disbursement system;

3. Intensified the coordination with the ITTO secretariat;

4. More conviction in regulations;

5. Improved coordination with MOFEC, as the leading partner of the Project.

4.3 Acceptability of Assumptions Made Assumptions made on the Project background, justification, objectives and expected output were acceptable. Assumptions on implementation were mostly correct, yet when the Project was in progress a further target was then deemed nessecary without additional funding. A granting for an output extension of independent training institution and Personnel Registration Body, was granted by the committee.

4.4 Acceptability of Accurate Identification of the Risks Involved

The dramatic change in political situation was unpredictable and it caused delays as MOFEC, a major partner in this Project, had undergone some changes that slowed down the coordination with the Project. A delay in the third instaliment of funds from the ITTO had also effected the speed of the Project. Restructuring of the implementing agency and change of regulations issued by the national board of accreditation were among subjects that were not anticipated to come up during the Project.

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Fo,-est Management in Indonesia 29

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

becomes as fundamental instrument to obtain credible information in related region scope, regarding the condition of companies or individuals applying for certification. In the future, when more authorities were delegated to provincial government, this forum will increasingly become more important in its capacity as a meeting forum for all the stakeholders of Sustainable Forest Management in their respective area. LEI also has accredited an independent training institution that will conduct the training using the standardized training materials and participated by personnel inside the SFM certification system. To monitor the performance! track records of these personnel, a system on Personnel Registration Body (PRB) has been designated and LEI was expecting an independent institution to perform this function. However, observing that there was still of lack of genuine interest from the public to perform this function, LEI has resolved to carry-out this function during their initial duration.

4.2 Measures and Steps Taken to Avoid Discrepancy 1. Improved the cooperation with some of the related stakeholders during the

implementation;

2. Intensified the understanding on fund disbursement system;

3. Intensified the coordination with the ITTO secretariat;

4. More conviction in regulations;

5. Improved coordination with MOFEC, as the leading partner of the Project.

4.3 Acceptability of Assumptions Made Assumptions made on the Project background, justification, objectives and expected output were acceptable. Assumptions on implementation were mostly correct, yet when the Project was in progress a further target was then deemed nessecary without additional funding. A granting for an output extension of independent training institution and Personnel Registration Body, was granted by the committee.

4.4 Acceptability of Accurate Identification of the Risks Involved

The dramatic change in political situation was unpredictable and it caused delays as MOFEC, a major partner in this Project, had undergone some changes that slowed down the coordination with the Project. A delay in the third instaliment of funds from the ITTO had also effected the speed of the Project. Restructuring of the implementing agency and change of regulations issued by the national board of accreditation were among subjects that were not anticipated to come up during the Project.

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Fo,-est Management in Indonesia 29


/ i

4.5 Project Sustainability by Implementation Outcome after the Project Completion

Sustainability of the Project is guaranteed by continuation of training for personnel involved in LEI-SFM certification conducted by LEI itself and by LEI's accredited training institutions. With experience, the standardized training manuals and modules will be continuously refined with new techniques and methods proven to be effective. Capacity building of all stakeholders and the maintenance of regional forums, database, web page and information dissemination will be continued indefinitely by LEI.

4.6 Acceptability of Project Inputs The financial, material, personnel, and inputs as have been received by the implementing agency were acceptable.

5.1 Situation Upon Project Completion as Compared to Situation in Pre-project

In accordance with the Development Objectives and Specific Objectives of the Project, the main focus of the Project has been to provide necessary pre-requirements to assure the availability of qualified personnel in the implementation of SFM certification. The Project also concentrated on increasing the capacity' of the institution involved in certification by establishing networks and information dissemination among various stakeholders. Several important changes after the Project completion were as follows:

1. Refined LEI-SFM certification system. The refinement of the LEI-SFM certification system was conducted in-line with the improvement of data collection and analysis method developed in this Project, and practical experience gained during the field test and the system implementation.

2. Establishment of a system for training of personnel involved in the SFM certification. The system, which was comprised of manuals, curriculums, and modules for assessors, decision-making panels and trainers, are now widely used as foundation for other trainings 'conducted by other relevant parties of SFM, such as APHI (Association of Forest Entrepreneur) and the center of education and training of MOFEC. The training was an addition to existing trainings that were conducted by LEI and its accredited training institution.

3. The availability of 137 trained SFM certification assessors from various different background of forestry and regions, 40 Chain of Custody assessors, 16

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Forest Management in Indone~ia 30

I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I

/

" 4.5 Project Sustainability by Implementation Outcome after the Project Completion

Sustainability of the Project is guaranteed by continuation of training for personnel involved in LEI-SFM certification conducted by LEI itself and by LEI's accredited training institutions. With experience, the standardized training manuals and modules will be continuously refined with new techniques and methods proven to be effective. Capacity building of all stakeholders and the maintenance of regional forums, database, web page and information dissemination will be continued indefinitely by LEI.

4.6 Acceptability of Project Inputs The financial, material, personnel, and inputs as have been received by the implementing agency were acceptable.

...... 5.1 Situation Upon Project Completion as Compared to

Situation in Pre-project In accordance with the Development Objectives and Specific Objectives of the Project, the main focus of the Project has been to provide necessary pre-requirements to assure the availability of qualified personnel in the implementation of SFM certification. The Project also concentrated on increasing the capacity' of the institution involved in certification by establishing networks and information dissemination among various stakeholders. Several important changes after the Project completion were as follows:

1. Refined LEI-SFM certification system. The refinement of the LEI-SFM certification system was conducted in-line with the improvement of data collection and analysis method developed in this Project, and practical experience gained during the field test and the system implementation.

2. Establishment of a system for training of personnel involved in the SFM certification. The system, which was comprised of manuals, curriculums, and modules for assessors, decision-making panels and trainers, are now widely used as foundation for other trainings 'conducted by other relevant parties of SFM, such as APHI (Association of Forest Entrepreneur) and the center of education and training of MOFEC. The training was an addition to existing trainings that were conducted by LEI and its accredited training institution.

3. The availability of 137 trained SFM certification assessors from various different background of forestry and regions, 40 Chain of Custody assessors, 16

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Forest Management in Indone~ia 30


.' .i

F qualified trainers in the field of either social, ecology, production and other forestry practices, along with 81 trained decision-making panels.

4. A center of certification database documentation where the information were not just from Indonesia, but also from various information source to be used as references, including of what have been gathered from the internet. Including a lot of obtainable related forestry materials and current environmental issues in Indonesia.

5. The creation of regional consultation Forum for allstakeholders at provincial level. As an effective partner in the field establishment of SFM, this forum has played a big role in providing objective information concerning subjects of certification and the general forest and environmental conditions in related area. In light of approaching autonomy for provincial governments where many policies related to SFM will be determined by provincial governments, the regional consultation would is very potential to become a strategic forum to stakeholders from all sides of the spectrum to meet and discuss relevant issues of environment, including the certification.

5.2 Extent to which the project's Specific Objectives was Achieved

The Project's specific objectives were fully achieved by the end of the Project.

5.3 Impact of the Project's Results on Sectoral Programs

The refined standards of SFM certification was an input to national forestry plan. Through this Project, the effort on human resources development will enable the MOFEC to increase Indonesia's links with the international forest management community and to improve awareness of forest management issues and approaches in Indonesia.

5.4 Project Sustainability After the Project Realization

Sustainability after the completion of the project was confirmed due to continuous demand of SFM certification, where LEI will continue to drive the implementation of SFM certification in Indonesia. This, and the fact that other parties like LEl's certification bodies, LEl's accredited training institution and a number of forest management units were using, promoting, and implementing the LEI certification system, it would be more than certain that Ecolabelling will continue to evolve with the latest techniques and experience.

5.5 Assumptions Made and Prevailing Conditions Upon Completion

Due to some unexpected factors in political situation as well an extension of the program



qualified trainers in the field of either social, ecology, production and other forestry practices, along with 81 trained decision-making panels.

4. A center of certification database documentation where the information were not just from Indonesia, but also from various information source to be used as references, including of what have been gathered from the internet. Including a lot of obtainable related forestry materials and current environmental issues in Indonesia.

5. The creation of regional consultation Forum for allstakeholders at provincial level. As an effective partner in the field establishment of SFM, this forum has played a big role in providing objective information concerning subjects of certification and the general forest and environmental conditions in related area. In light of approaching autonomy for provincial governments where many policies related to SFM will be determined by provincial governments, the regional consultation would is very potential to become a strategic forum to stakeholders from all sides of the spectrum to meet and discuss relevant issues of environment, including the certification.

5.2 Extent to which the project's Specific Objectives was Achieved

The Project's specific objectives were fully achieved by the end of the Project.

5.3 Impact of the Project's Results on Sectoral Programs

The refined standards of SFM certification was an input to national forestry plan. Through this Project, the effort on human resources development will enable the MOFEC to increase Indonesia's links with the international forest management community and to improve awareness of forest management issues and approaches in Indonesia.

5.4 Project Sustainability After the Project Realization

Sustainability after the completion of the project was confirmed due to continuous demand of SFM certification, where LEI will continue to drive the implementation of SFM certification in Indonesia. This, and the fact that other parties like LEl's certification bodies, LEl's accredited training institution and a number of forest management units were using, promoting, and implementing the LEI certification system, it would be more than certain that Ecolabelling will continue to evolve with the latest techniques and experience.

5.5 Assumptions Made and Prevailing Conditions Upon Completion

Due to some unexpected factors in political situation as well an extension of the program



/ ,I without additional funds, the Project has been extended from the initial completion date of February 2000. The purpose of extension and amendment were to strengthen specific outputs and activities of the Project to expand target beneficiaries and to strengthen the focus on main objectives of developing the assessor's capabilities in the field assessment and to enhance the capacity-building of the personnel.

6.1 Specific Objectives in Achievements and Outputs 1. Realized

Specific objectives pOint 1 and point 2 have been fully realized.

2. Partly Realized

None

3. Unrealized

None

6.2 Outputs 1. Realized

The outputs of this project has been realized.

2. Partly Realized

None

3. Unrealized

None

6.3 Schedule On time:

Improved data collection and analysis method for Sustainable Forest Management criteria and indicators.

Standardized training curriculum and materials on inspection for SFM with improved capability of assessors' firms and individuals for field inspections, improved capability of conducting assessment, improved the knowledge and awareness.

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Fcrest Management in Indonesia 32


/ .1

without additional funds, the Project has been extended from the initial completion date of February 2000. The purpose of extension and amendment were to strengthen specific outputs and activities of the Project to expand target beneficiaries and to strengthen the focus on main objectives of developing the assessor's capabilities in the field assessment and to enhance the capacity-building of the personnel.

6.1 Specific Objectives in Achievements and Outputs 1. Realized

Specific objectives point 1 and point 2 have been fully realized.

2. Partly Realized

None

3. Unrealized

None

6.2 Outputs 1. Realized

The outputs of this project has been realized.

2. Partly Realized

None

3. Unrealized

None

6.3 Schedule On time:

Improved data collection and analysis method for Sustainable Forest Management criteria and indicators.

Standardized training curriculum and materials on inspection for SFM with improved capability of assessors' firms and individuals for field inspections, improved capability of conducting assessment, improved the knowledge and awareness.

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Fcrest Management in Indonesia 32


, //"

Slightly delayed:

Establishment of an independent training institution Establishment of an independent Personnel Registration Body

Seriously delayed:

None

6.4 Actual Expenditures 1. Below plan

The total expenditures is 1 % below plan

2. 10% above plan

None

3. 20% above plan

None

6.5 Potentiality of Reproduction At the time the Project's training and system refinement were specifically aimed for certification in the natural production forest. In the very near future, as demanded, certification for plantation and community forestry would follow. The need for personnel and system enhancement therefore arises and should be provided. Due to the fact that now, we have an operating system for the training as added with experience in the application, the potential of reproduction is significant.

6.6 Potentiality to Larger Scale 1. Not Potential

None

2. Modest Potentialn

None

3. Significant Potential

With focus on training for personnel involved in the SFM certification, this Project has the potentiality to broaden its scale to the training of plantation and community based forest management, which are apparently ready to be applied. The target from LEI was that by mid 2001 those two certifications would be set for field implementation.



Slightly delayed:

Establishment of an independent training institution Establishment of an independent Personnel Registration Body

Seriously delayed:

None

6.4 Actual Expenditures 1. Below plan

The total expenditures is 1 % below plan

2. 10% above plan

None

3. 20% above plan

None

6.5 Potentiality of Reproduction At the time the Project's training and system refinement were specifically aimed for certification in the natural production forest. In the very near future, as demanded, certification for plantation and community forestry would follow. The need for personnel and system enhancement therefore arises and should be provided. Due to the fact that now, we have an operating system for the training as added with experience in the application, the potential of reproduction is significant.

6.6 Potentiality to Larger Scale 1. Not Potential

None

2. Modest Potentialn

None

3. Significant Potential

With focus on training for personnel involved in the SFM certification, this Project has the potentiality to broaden its scale to the training of plantation and community based forest management, which are apparently ready to be applied. The target from LEI was that by mid 2001 those two certifications would be set for field implementation.


I I I;;

.,;;.-

I"~'.'.", -'0""

':::p,

I.: I, I I I I I, I I I I I I I I I

,,' /,'

PART III CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In general, development lessons learned from the project were as follows:

a. The accomplishment of SFM implementation in Indonesia is greatly affected through the government regulations whose application brought more effectiveness in the implementation field. Lack of perception regarding SFM implementation in the local governmental level decelerated the implementation of SFM in Indonesia.

b. Problem in providing qualified personels and building of institutional capacity to implement SFM must be overcome due to the importance of these components in acheiving a credible SFM. '

The lessons learned in the development stage were the following:

1.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System (a) Lack of information and knowledge in part of LEI's stakeholders involved in the

SFM certification system;

(b) Lack of awareness on the practical level of the use of SFM criteria and indicators for the improving and controlling of forest management performace

(c) Insufficient government regulation to support SFM implementation both in Forest Management Unit level and National level.

1.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel (a) Lack of working opportunities in the certification field and low standard of salary

have caused stagnation on several certification activities;


I I I~;;

... ,;;.-

I.

I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I

PART III CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In general, development lessons learned from the project were as follows:

a. The accomplishment of SFM implementation in Indonesia is greatly affected through the government regulations whose application brought more effectiveness in the implementation field. Lack of perception regarding SFM implementation in the local governmental level decelerated the implementation of SFM in Indonesia.

b. Problem in providing qualified personels and building of institutional capacity to implement SFM must be overcome due to the importance of these components in acheiving a credible SFM. .

The lessons learned in the development stage were the following:

1.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System (a) Lack of information and knowledge in part of LEI's stakeholders involved in the

SFM certification system;

(b) Lack of awareness on the practical level of the use of SFM criteria and indicators for the improving and controlling of forest management performace

(c) Insufficient government regulation to support SFM implementation both in Forest Management Unit level and National level.

1.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel (a) Lack of working opportunities in the certification field and low standard of salary

have caused stagnation on several certification activities;


I I I I I I

'>


I

_~l (b) In the tutoring to adopt SFM certification system, educational background and

experience did not always give positive impact to increasing of personnel's capacity;

(c) Mutual recognition towards the quality and capacity of an assessor between SFM certification institutions around the world has not been agreed for, therefore we may not be able to completely assure the quality of foreign assessor that conducts field assessment in Indonesia;

(d) The complexity of social/political problems in local and national level, followed by lack of law enforcement by the government, has caused difficulties to build comprehensive personnel capacity down to the grass-root level.

1.3 Strengthening of Institutional Capacity (a) The absence of transparent accreditation policy together with an impression of

monopolistic practices conducted by National Standardization Body have caused a set-back on the establishment of Personnel Registration Body and Independent Training Institution.

(b) The absence of personnel registration body in Indonesia for registration and for testing of field assessors and decision-making panels competency.

In general, operational lesson that could be learned from this project were as follows:

(1) Lack of an effective coordination in general between LEI and the stakeholders or related institutions. The lack was particularly caused by:

a. Limited availability of experts and other individuals to be involved in the process of developing the training and certification system, and this has caused some delays.

b. Organizational restructuring of the Executing Agency brought some delays in the project activities. The high flow rate of personnel in charge or related to the Project have caused some disruptions in the project current ideas and process.

(2) The emergence of unforeseen administrative and field problems during the project implementations.The following lessons learned during the operational stage as viewed from various components of the project:

2.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System (1) SFM is a new paradigm in managing a forest in a sustainable way still new and


I I I I I I

'>

I

I I I I I I I I

I

(b) In the tutoring to adopt SFM certification system, educational background and experience did not always give positive impact to increasing of personnel's capacity;

(c) Mutual recognition towards the quality and capacity of an assessor between SFM certification institutions around the world has not been agreed for, therefore we may not be able to completely assure the quality of foreign assessor that conducts field assessment in Indonesia;

(d) The complexity of social/political problems in local and national level, followed by lack of law enforcement by the government, has caused difficulties to build comprehensive personnel capacity down to the grass-root level.

1.3 Strengthening of Institutional Capacity (a) The absence of transparent accreditation policy together with an impression of

monopolistic practices conducted by National Standardization Body have caused a set-back on the establishment of Personnel Registration Body and Independent Training Institution.

(b) The absence of personnel registration body in Indonesia for registration and for testing of field assessors and decision-making panels competency.

In general, operational lesson that could be learned from this project were as follows:

(1) Lack of an effective coordination in general between LEI and the stakeholders or related institutions. The lack was particularly caused by:

a. Limited availability of experts and other individuals to be involved in the process of developing the training and certification system, and this has caused some delays.

b. Organizational restructuring of the Executing Agency brought some delays in the project activities. The high flow rate of personnel in charge or related to the Project have caused some disruptions in the project current ideas and process.

(2) The emergence of unforeseen administrative and field problems during the project implementations.The following lessons learned during the operational stage as viewed from various components of the project:

2.1 Strengthening of Sustainable Forest Management Certification System (1) SFM is a new paradigm in managing a forest in a sustainable way still new and


I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I

~l' therefore it is actually difficult to comprehend either conceptual or in implementation level. Parties involved in the development of the SFM certification system, which include the government, NGO's, Certification Bodies, Forest Management Unit and Assessors, were still grasping on how to formulate and implement the SFM certification concept. Thus, international initiatives such as criteria and indicators coming from the ITTO was adopted as the basis of the LEI system.

(2) With the aim of reaching international market acceptance on the certification system developed by LEI, several international cooperation and recognition were performed. The FSC, that has a wide market acceptance and supported by major NGO's had agreed to work together with LEI to achieve the status of compatibility on the certification system. However, this process has not been completely formulated by occurrence of differences in the approach and formulation of certification

(3) Problems appeared during the collection of field data to test the effectiveness of criteria and indicators have brought the need to refine certification system and situation that caused some delays in its completetion. This in turn has some effects upon the completetion of the training system for assessors and expert panels.

(4) Government policies that are related to forestry has did not have the ability to solve the existing problems, like: legality of forest area, security in the said area, and institutional development. This condition will obstuct the achievement of SFM, especially through the SFM certification design.

2.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel

(1) Uncertainty of the rights of Forest Management Unit and the weakness of regulation that support the rights of forest land and forest area arrangement, added by lack of improvement in forest management institution were causes that have decreased the concern of forest entrepreneur to protect their forest resources and discouraged their interest to apply for certification.

(2) The SFM certification system was a relatively new instrument in achieving SFM, and it has not been easily comprehended by the general public. It was realized that training, socialization, and public awareness campaign will take time and lot of continuous effort. Existing condition of limited funds to empower the people towards sustainable managed forest has caused a pending on several socializing activity of SFM activity.

Strengthening of the Institiutional Capacity

(1) Lack of understanding between LEI and BSN, has caused several activities that are aimed at the establishment of an institution to support the strenghtening of personnel capacity, was delayed. As an independent institution, LEI believed strongly that conflict of interest can effect the decision-making process. While BSN, as a centralistic government accreditation body has stated that LEI has become an intrusion to the national accreditation scheme. The situation has caused many long debates and discussions that never come into any conclusion.


I I I I "

I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I

therefore it is actually difficult to comprehend either conceptual or in implementation level, Parties involved in the development of the SFM certification system, which include the government, NGO's, Certification Bodies, Forest Management Unit and Assessors, were still grasping on how to formulate and implement the SFM certification concept. Thus, international initiatives such as criteria and indicators coming from the ITTO was adopted as the basis of the LEI system.

(2) With the aim of reaching international market acceptance on the certification system developed by LEI, several international cooperation and recognition were performed. The FSC, that has a wide market acceptance and supported by major NGO's had agreed to work together with LEI to achieve the status of compatibility on the certification system. However, this process has not been completely formulated by occurrence of differences in the approach and formulation of certification

(3) Problems appeared during the collection of field data to test the effectiveness of criteria and indicators have brought the need to refine certification system and situation that caused some delays in its completetion. This in turn has some effects upon the completetion of the training system for assessors and expert panels.

(4) Government policies that are related to forestry has did not have the ability to solve the existing problems, like: legality of forest area, security in the said area, and institutional development. This condition will obstuct the achievement of SFM, especially through the SFM certification design.

2.2 Capacity Improvement of Certification Personnel

(1) Uncertainty of the rights of Forest Management Unit and the weakness of regulation that support the rights of forest land and forest area arrangement, added by lack of improvement in forest management institution were causes that have decreased the concern of forest entrepreneur to protect their forest resources and discouraged their interest to apply for certification.

(2) The SFM certification system was a relatively new instrument in achieving SFM, and it has not been easily comprehended by the general public. It was realized that training, socialization, and public awareness campaign will take time and lot of continuous effort. Existing condition of limited funds to empower the people towards sustainable managed forest has caused a pending on several socializing activity of SFM activity.

Strengthening of the Institiutional Capacity

(1) Lack of understanding between LEI and BSN, has caused several activities that are aimed at the establishment of an institution to support the strenghtening of personnel capacity, was delayed. As an independent institution, LEI believed strongly that conflict of interest can effect the decision-making process. While BSN, as a centralistic government accreditation body has stated that LEI has become an intrusion to the national accreditation scheme. The situation has caused many long debates and discussions that never come into any conclusion.


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r

I

uJ> (2) Many initiatives from independent institutions which were supported by LEI did

not achevied the minimum requirements, and consequently, to maintain professionalisme, it would not be possible for LEI to accredit institutions that can not prove their credibility.

3.1. Identification (1) The multi-stakeholder process scheme in the development of the SFM certifica

tion and training system could be approved by examining the effectiveness and effiiciency of the activity.

(2) Government shall acknowledge the SFM principles and perceive recognition on how to implement through government control and policy reforms.

(3) Planners must be practical-minded and should be aware of problems that may faced in the field during the practice ..

(4) To increase number of related institutions or local initiatives and to establish effective coordination amongst them.

3.2 Design (1) More close and more frequent visit to local districts during public awareness pro

gram execution on Sustainable Forest Management and on principles of Forest certification.

(2) Developed ideas on the formulation of alternatives plans.

(3) Building networks between LEI, the Government, NGO's, Certification Bodies, with the purpose of strengthening the credibility of the LEI's system and to develop the community participation in controlling forest management.

3.3. Implementation (1) Financial documentation shall be prepared with accuracy, controlled and moni

tored properly by authorized persons.

(2) Program implementation by assessors and expert panels shall be in line with its original planning to ensure the activities are conducted accordingly.


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r

(2) Many initiatives from independent institutions which were supported by LEI did not achevied the minimum requirements, and consequently, to maintain professionalisme, it would not be possible for LEI to accredit institutions that can not prove their credibility.

3.1. Identification (1) The multi-stakeholder process scheme in the development of the SFM certifica

tion and training system could be approved by examining the effectiveness and effiiciency of the activity.

(2) Government shall acknowledge the SFM principles and perceive recognition on how to implement through government control and policy reforms.

(3) Planners must be practical-minded and should be aware of problems that may faced in the field during the practice ..

(4) To increase number of related institutions or local initiatives and to establish effective coordination amongst them.

3.2 Design (1) More close and more frequent visit to local districts during public awareness pro

gram execution on Sustainable Forest Management and on principles of Forest certification.

(2) Developed ideas on the formulation of alternatives plans.

(3) Building networks between LEI, the Government, NGO's, Certification Bodies, with the purpose of strengthening the credibility of the LEI's system and to develop the community participation in controlling forest management.

3.3. Implementation (1) Financial documentation shall be prepared with accuracy, controlled and moni

tored properly by authorized persons.

(2) Program implementation by assessors and expert panels shall be in line with its original planning to ensure the activities are conducted accordingly.


, I I I , I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I

.f

.1 <"'Ii_~ ..............................................................................................................

3.4 Organization (1) LEI should maintain good relationship with LEI's accredited certification bodies

including employed assessors;

(2) LEI should maintain a good relationship with expert panel members;

(3) LEI should maintain a good communication with Regional Consultation Forum as the local initiatives that have contribution in the fact finding for forest assessment data completion;

(4) LEI should work closely with Non-Government Organization as the system controller.

3.5 Management (1) Project Officer shall be responsible in the controlling of the Project activities and

outputs.

(2) In the event of a change in the structure of the project management, the later Project Officer shall take over the previous officer's responsibility over the Project.

(3) Steering Committee meeting shall be effective and productive by giving more information and suggestions.

3.6 Responsible for the report

Name

Position held

Date

Dr. Dradjad H. Wibowo

Project Officer (8 May 2000 to 1 September 2001)

1 September, 2001

<:j\s.~

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Name

Position held

Ir. Daru Asycarya

Assistant Project Officer (15 November 1998 to 1 October 2000) 0h

"...,

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Name

Position held

Aditya Bayunanda, S.Hut.

Assistant Project Officer (1 October 2000 to 1 September 2001)

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia

•• 11111111111111l1li111

, I I I

I I I I

, I I I I I I I I I

.f

.1 <* Ii_~ 1414 ... ..............................................................................................................

3.4 Organization (1) LEI should maintain good relationship with LEI's accredited certification bodies

including employed assessors;

(2) LEI should maintain a good relationship with expert panel members;

(3) LEI should maintain a good communication with Regional Consultation Forum as the local initiatives that have contribution in the fact finding for forest assessment data completion;

(4) LEI should work closely with Non-Government Organization as the system controller.

3.5 Management (1) Project Officer shall be responsible in the controlling of the Project activities and

outputs.

(2) In the event of a change in the structure of the project management, the later Project Officer shall take over the previous officer's responsibility over the Project.

(3) Steering Committee meeting shall be effective and productive by giving more information and suggestions.

3.6 Responsible for the report

Name

Position held

Date

Name

Position held

Name

Position held

Dr. Dradjad H. Wibowo

Project Officer (8 May 2000 to 1 September 2001)

1 September, 2001

lr. Daru Asycarya

Assistant Project Officer (15 November 1998 to 1 October 2000)

Aditya Bayunanda, S.Hut.

Assistant Project Officer (1 October 2000 to 1 September 2001)


111l1li111111111111l1lil1li111

- - - - - - -. .- - .- - -• ::;I Qj

:i" s· IQ

0 (!)

C1i .g :3 (!)

~ 0 :::. ),. en en (!) » en en :3 (!)

~ -C 0 ..... -C Cl)

c: en

m ID s· Q)

Z 0-iD

d' C <il ~ -~ >< :::. Q) m ~ :3

(J) (!)

~ s· S" g. :::. (!) en ii;.

- - - - - - -. .- - .- - -• ::;I Qj

:i" s· IQ

0 (!)

C1i .g :3 (!)

~ 0 :::. ),. en en (!) » en en :3 (!)

~ -C 0 ..... -C Cl)

c: en

m ID s· Q)

Z 0-iD

d' C <il ~ -~ >< :::. Q) m ~ :3

(J) (!)

~ s· S" g. :::. (!) en ii;.

• ~ s' S'

<Q

tJ Cl> (§ .g :3 Cl>

~ 0 ::> h CJ) r-CJ) Cl> CJ) _. CJ) en :3 Cl> .... ~

0 0 ..., (I) <::

~ CJ) -I » or s' ..,

l:J III Q) 0-l:J CD

6J ::J CD Cil (1) :::J ~ a. 0... ~ » >< ::> III

<Q en -.l. Cl> :3 en Cl>

~ (1) s' en ::; g. en ::> 0 Cl> CJ) .., Qi'

• ~ s' S'

<Q

tJ Cl> (§ .g :3 Cl>

~ 0 ::> h CJ) r-CJ) Cl> CJ) _. CJ) en :3 Cl> .... ~

0 0 ..., (I) <::

~ CJ) -I » or s' ..,

l:J III Q) 0-l:J CD

6J ::J CD Cil (1) :::J ~ a. 0... ~ » >< ::> III

<Q en -.l. Cl> :3 en Cl>

~ (1) s' en ::; g. en ::> 0 Cl> CJ) .., Qi'


/

LIST OF ASSESSOR THE INDONESIAN ECOLABELLING INSTITUTE

NO. N A M E OFFICE ADDRESS CLASS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

01. Ir. M. Yusup Napiri PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2,6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

02. Ir. Budi Priyatna PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2, 6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

03. Ir. Gungung Senoaji PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2, 6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

04. Ir. Agus Priyono Kartono PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2, 6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

05. Ir. Taufik Margani PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

06. Ir. Fernandus Agung PMW PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

07. Ir. Hendrayus PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

08. Ir. Jalal PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

09. Ir. Sad Hasto Agus S PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

10. Ir. Dita Mirwandi PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12, JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34, Jakarta Selatan Telp. 021-7983666, Fax. 021-7987011

11. Ir. M. Haris Witjaksono PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011

12. Ir. Hasan Asy"ari PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Ray? Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011

13. Ir. Triyan Aidil Fitri PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011


Social

Production

Production

Ecology

Production

Production

Production

Social

Ecology

Ecology

Production

Production

Production


LIST OF ASSESSOR THE INDONESIAN ECOLABELLING INSTITUTE

NO. N A M E OFFICE ADDRESS CLASS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

01. Ir. M. Yusup Napiri PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2,6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

02. Ir. Budi Priyatna PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2, 6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

03. Ir. Gungung Senoaji PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2, 6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

04. Ir. Agus Priyono Kartono PT. Ekokon Nusantara JI. Yos Sudarso Kav. 49 Viterna Building Lt. I Jakarta Telp. 021-6517651-2, 6516369 Fax. 021-7983630

05. Ir. Taufik Margani PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

06. Ir. Fernandus Agung PMW PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

07. Ir. Hendrayus PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

08. Ir. Jalal PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

09. Ir. Sad Hasto Agus S PT. Tanindo, Gedung Jasa Tania, JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp. 021-3900683, Fax. 021-3900683

10. Ir. Dita Mirwandi PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12, JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34, Jakarta Selatan Telp. 021-7983666, Fax. 021-7987011

11. Ir. M. Haris Witjaksono PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011

12. Ir. Hasan Asy"ari PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Ray? Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011

13. Ir. Triyan Aidil Fitri PT. Sucofindo, Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011


Social

Production

Production

Ecology

Production

Production

Production

Social

Ecology

Ecology

Production

Production

Production

I I I 14. Ir. Warsid Sumarlin PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12

JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011 Social

15. YB. Anang Tri Nugroho PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok A/21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp. 021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Ecology I

16. Ir. Langgeng Wiharto PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Production I

17. Ir. Subaktio PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok A/21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Social I

18. Drs. Saiful Bahri PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Ecology I

19. Ir. M. Achyari PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp. 021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Production I

20. Abu Amar PT. Furindo Sangun Konsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu No. 12A Komplek Ruko Guna Sank Jakarta 12740 Telp.021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074 Production I

21. Ir. Purwaka PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Ecology I

22. Ating Sobari PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Social I

23. Ir. Daru Asycarya PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Ecology I

24. Ir. Dian Susanti PT. Mutuagung Lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Ecology I

25. Muhammad Noor Efansyah PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18, JI. Wijaya 11, Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Ecology I

26. Ir. RM Adjiputro Sidi W. PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

27. Hidik Heru untoro PT. Mutuagung Lestari , Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

28. Ir. Rahmad Santoso PT. Mutuagung Lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

29. Ir. Victor Antonio Amir PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

I • Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia

I

I I

.'

I ,/ 14. Ir. Warsid Sumarlin PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12

JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-7983666 Fax. 021-7987011 Social

15. YB. Anang Tri Nugroho PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok A/21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp. 021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Ecology I

16. Ir. Langgeng Wiharto PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Production I

17. Ir. Subaktio PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok A/21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Social I

18. Drs. Saiful Bahri PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Ecology

19. Ir. M. Achyari PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp. 021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Production

20. Abu Amar PT. Furindo Sangun Konsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu No. 12A Komplek Ruko Guna Sank Jakarta 12740 Telp.021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074 Production I

21. Ir. Purwaka PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Ecology I

22. Ating Sobari PT. AdhiMulia Puma Servindo Plaza Sekasi Slok Al21-22 JI. Ir. H. Juanda 81 Sekasi Telp.021-8800776 Fax. 021-8803205 Social I

23. Ir. Daru Asycarya PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Ecology I

24. Ir. Dian Susanti PT. Mutuagung Lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Ecology I

25. Muhammad Noor Efansyah PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18, JI. Wijaya 11, Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Ecology I

26. Ir. RM Adjiputro Sidi W. PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

27. Hidik Heru untoro PT. Mutuagung Lestari , Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

28. Ir. Rahmad Santoso PT. Mutuagung Lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

29. Ir. Victor Antonio Amir PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994 Production I

I • Training Development on Assessment of Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia

I

I I··'·;: .,

, ,

la'~~~ . ::·'~~jli~ .. ·::_-.:._ .. '-.'-

:;;"'~~;7:;, ~.' - <. .'.

I'~ ::C~'1!;'·"

',. "3:iJ~:t~~-~-~,: ' , ;-'.''';i.,~:;- '.'"

;2~/ ':-;~~. :

.ft IX~ Ir I' I I I I· I I I I I

30. Ir. Ismu Zulfikar

31. Ir. Agus Darmawan

32. Ir. Nawa Irianto

33. Ir. Mohammad Azam

34. Ir. Hartati

35. Ir. Utomo

36. Ir. Heru Komarudin

37. Reina Widiyanti Azis

38. Jati Asmara

39. Ir. Rahman Purwoko

40. Ir. Aisyah Amini Hidayat

41. Ir. Zul irham

42. Ir. Nunung Nurohmah

43. Ir. I wayan Sudi Antara

44. Ir. E. Gangga Permana

PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Blok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya" Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994

PT. PT. Access Centrakarya, Komplek Villa Bogor Indah Blok F3 No. 22 Bogor 16710 Telp.0251-660751 Fax. 0251-319041

PT. PT. Access Centrakarya, Komplek Villa Bogor Indah Blok F3 No. 22 Bogor 16710 Telp.0251-660751 Fax. 0251-319041 PT. SetyaMltra Bhakti Persada JI. H. Nawi No. 6 Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Telp.021-7654523 Fax. 021-4890521

PT. SetyaMltra Bhakti Persada JI. H. Nawi No. 6, Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Telp.021-7654523 Fax. 021-4890521

PT. SetyaMltra Bhakti Persada JI. H. Nawi No. 6 Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Telp.021-7654523 Fax. 021-4890521


PT. Wahana Bhakti Persadajaya JI. H. Nawi No. 6 Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Telp. 021-7654523 - 4 Fax. 021-7692281



PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232



PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F 1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 CiomaS Bogor 16610 Telp.0251 c634086 Fax. 0251-634232


Production

Social

Production

Production

Production

Production

Ecology

Eology

Ecology

Production

Production

Ecology

Production

Ecology

Production

I I'

I I I· I I I I I

30. Ir. Ismu Zulfikar

31. Ir. Agus Darmawan

32. Ir. Nawa Irianto

33. Ir. Mohammad Azam

34. Ir. Hartati

35. Ir. Utomo

36. Ir. Heru Komarudin

37. Reina Widiyanti Azis

38. Jati Asmara

39. Ir. Rahman Purwoko

40. Ir. Aisyah Amini Hidayat

41. Ir. Zul irham

42. Ir. Nunung Nurohmah

43. Ir. I wayan Sudi Antara

44. Ir. E. Gangga Permana

PT. Mutuagung Lestari, Wijaya Graha Puri Blok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya" Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994

PT. PT. Access Centrakarya, Komplek Villa Bogor Indah Blok F3 No. 22 Bogor 16710 Telp.0251-660751 Fax. 0251-319041

PT. PT. Access Centrakarya, Komplek Villa Bogor Indah Blok F3 No. 22 Bogor 16710 Telp.0251-660751 Fax. 0251-319041 PT. SetyaMltra Bhakti Persada JI. H. Nawi No. 6 Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Telp.021-7654523 Fax. 021-4890521

PT. SetyaMltra Bhakti Persada JI. H. Nawi No. 6, Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Telp.021-7654523 Fax. 021-4890521









PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F 1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 CiomaS Bogor 16610 Telp.0251 c634086 Fax. 0251-634232


Production

Social

Production

Production

Production

Production

Ecology

Eology

Ecology

Production

Production

Ecology

Production

Ecology

Production

I I I

I;

I I w I;

I I I I I I I I I I

45. Ir. Isbat PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

46. Drs. Kasirun Alnasir Abdulloh PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari

47. Ir. Lukman Mulyanto

Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 1"6610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

48. Ir. Haryono PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 Bogor Telp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

49. Ir. Lukman Hakim AI Abah PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 BogorTelp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

50. Ir. Akhmad PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 BogorTelp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

51. Ir. Rudi Hambali PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 BogorTelp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

52. Ir. Marolop Sianipar PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 Bogor Telp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

53. Ir. Rahmad Imam Sucipto PT. Reka Paramitra, JI. Kayu Putih Timur 128 Jakarta Telp.021-4890521 Fax. 0214890521, 4721873

54. Ir. Adrian Hakim PT. Reka Paramitra, JI. Kayu Putih Timur 128 Jakarta Telp.021-4890521 Fax. 0214890521, 4721873

55. Ir. Slamet Prayoga PT. Reka Paramitra JI. Kayu Putih Timur 128 Jakarta Telp.021-4890521 Fax. 0214890521, 4721873

56. Ir. Nieke Rosdiana PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144. Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

57. Ir. Zaenal Arifin PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144. Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

58. Annaka Kismandani PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144 Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

59. Ir. Heni Handayani PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144 Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597


Social

Social

Production

Ecology

Ecology

Ecology

Production

Social

Ecology

Production

Production

Production

Ecology

Social

Production

I I I

I

I I I I I

45. Ir. Isbat PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

46. Drs. Kasirun Alnasir Abdulloh PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari

47. Ir. Lukman Mulyanto

Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Raya Pagelaran Blok F1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor 1"6610 Telp.0251-634086 Fax. 0251-634232

48. Ir. Haryono PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 Bogor Telp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

49. Ir. Lukman Hakim AI Abah PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 BogorTelp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

50. Ir. Akhmad PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 BogorTelp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

51. Ir. Rudi Hambali PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 BogorTelp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

52. Ir. Marolop Sianipar PT. Ayamaru Baktipertiwi Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Medika III B - Blok AN No. 11 Bogor Telp. 0251-319648 Fax. 0251-319648

53. Ir. Rahmad Imam Sucipto PT. Reka Paramitra, JI. Kayu Putih Timur 128 Jakarta Telp.021-4890521 Fax. 0214890521, 4721873

54. Ir. Adrian Hakim PT. Reka Paramitra, JI. Kayu Putih Timur 128 Jakarta Telp.021-4890521 Fax. 0214890521, 4721873

55. Ir. Slamet Prayoga PT. Reka Paramitra JI. Kayu Putih Timur 128 Jakarta Telp.021-4890521 Fax. 0214890521, 4721873

56. Ir. Nieke Rosdiana PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144. Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

57. Ir. Zaenal Arifin PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144. Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

58. Annaka Kismandani PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144 Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

59. Ir. Heni Handayani PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144 Telp.0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597


Social

Social

Production

Ecology

Ecology

Ecology

Production

Social

Ecology

Production

Production

Production

Ecology

Social

Production

I I I I~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

"",;/'. 60. Luki Turniajaya, BScf

61. Ir. Wuri Pratini Hawiati

PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144 Telp. 0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

PT. Selaras Rona JI. Cikini Raya No. 40 Jakarta Telp.021-3149127-28 Fax. 021-3149126

62. Ir. Fuad Say Benny JI. Langsat No. 34 Jakarta 12130

Production

Production

Telp. 021-7255102-4 Fax. 021-7251227 Production

63. Ir. Sunardi Pusat Pengembangan Agribusnise (PPA) PT. Intisa JI. Tebet Timur Raya 57 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-8291096 Fax. 021-8291096 Social

64. Artamur PT. Akshara Ganesha Lima JI. Wijaya Kusuma Blok Q/19 Duren Sawit - Jakarta Fax. 021-8615540 Production

65. Ir. Muhammad Mustajab PT. Alas Kusuma (HPH) JI. Kol. Abujani No.168 Jambi Telp.0741-62313/5 Fax. 0741-61210 Ecology

66. Hari Subagyo PT. Alas Kusuma (HPH JI. P. Lubis No. 34 Jambi Telp.0741- Fax. 0741-64610 Ecology

67. Ir. Hariantara, MBA PT. Alas Kusuma (HPH) JI. Serendit 12 Samarinda 75117 Telp.0541- Fax. 0541-43118 Production

68. Ir. Amar Saleh PT. Diamond Raya Timber (HPH) JI. Dr. Sutomo No. 62 Pekanbaru Telp.0761- Fax. 0761-33595 Ecology

69. Ir. Yohannes Ismi ryan PT. Riau Pulp Pekanbaru Telp.0761- Fax. 0761-95305 Production

70. Ir. Widodo Joko Santoso BCI Biodiversity Conservation Indonesia (LSM) Kpp. Sindangbarang 2 JI. Neptunus Blok J No. 6 Bogor, Telp. 0251-628165 Fax. 0251-623017 Production

71. Rina Agustine, s. hut Yayasan Telapak JI. Sempur Kaler 16 Bogor 16154 Telp.0251- Fax. 0251-351069 Production

72. Drs. Zahedi Yayasan Leuser Lestari (LSM) JI. Samanhudi LK 4 No. 19 Medan 20152 Telp.061-558565 Fax. (via Wartel) 061-755483 Social

73. Drs. Prihandoko Sanjatmiko Jurusan Antropologi FISIP UI Kampus UI Depok 16424 Telp.021- Fax. 021-7872820 Social

74. Ir. Heru Patria Utama JL. Madura Gang Musholah No. 20 Rt. 01/11 Cinere 16514 Telp.021-7530253 Ecology

75. Sugiyana, S. hut Pademangan 11 Gang 19 No. 5 Rt. 07/03 Jakarta Utara Telp. 021-6415350 Fax. 021-2313788 Production

76. Ir. Kusnan Perumahan Bukit Sawangan Indah Blok D9 - 13 Parung - Bogor Production


I I I I~ I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

60. Luki Turniajaya, BScf

61. Ir. Wuri Pratini Hawiati

PT. Pro Natres Development JI. Melati Raya Blok A. V No. 16 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Bogor 16144 Telp. 0251-326597 Fax. 0251-326597

PT. Selaras Rona JI. Cikini Raya No. 40 Jakarta Telp.021-3149127-28 Fax. 021-3149126

62. Ir. Fuad Say Benny JI. Langsat No. 34 Jakarta 12130

Production

Production

Telp. 021-7255102-4 Fax. 021-7251227 Production

63. Ir. Sunardi Pusat Pengembangan Agribusnise (PPA) PT. Intisa JI. Tebet Timur Raya 57 Jakarta Selatan Telp.021-8291096 Fax. 021-8291096 Social

64. Artamur PT. Akshara Ganesha Lima JI. Wijaya Kusuma Blok Q/19 Duren Sawit - Jakarta Fax. 021-8615540 Production

65. Ir. Muhammad Mustajab PT. Alas Kusuma (HPH) JI. Kol. Abujani No.168 Jambi Telp.0741-62313/5 Fax. 0741-61210 Ecology

66. Hari Subagyo PT. Alas Kusuma (HPH JI. P. Lubis No. 34 Jambi Telp.0741- Fax. 0741-64610 Ecology

67. Ir. Hariantara, MBA PT. Alas Kusuma (HPH) JI. Serendit 12 Samarinda 75117 Telp.0541- Fax. 0541-43118 Production

68. Ir. Amar Saleh PT. Diamond Raya Timber (HPH) JI. Dr. Sutomo No. 62 Pekanbaru Telp.0761- Fax. 0761-33595 Ecology

69. Ir. Yohannes Ismi ryan PT. Riau Pulp Pekanbaru Telp.0761- Fax. 0761-95305 Production

70. Ir. Widodo Joko Santoso BCI Biodiversity Conservation Indonesia (LSM) Kpp. Sindangbarang 2 JI. Neptunus Blok J No. 6 Bogor, Telp. 0251-628165 Fax. 0251-623017 Production

71. Rina Agustine, s. hut Yayasan Telapak JI. Sempur Kaler 16 Bogor 16154 Telp.0251- Fax. 0251-351069 Production

72. Drs. Zahedi Yayasan Leuser Lestari (LSM) JI. Samanhudi LK 4 No. 19 Medan 20152 Telp.061-558565 Fax. (via Wartel) 061-755483 Social

73. Drs. Prihandoko Sanjatmiko Jurusan Antropologi FISIP UI Kampus UI Depok 16424 Telp.021- Fax. 021-7872820 Social

74. Ir. Heru Patria Utama JL. Madura Gang Musholah No. 20 Rt. 01/11 Cinere 16514 Telp.021-7530253 Ecology

75. Sugiyana, S. hut Pademangan 11 Gang 19 No. 5 Rt. 07/03 Jakarta Utara Telp. 021-6415350 Fax. 021-2313788 Production

76. Ir. Kusnan Perumahan Bukit Sawangan Indah Blok D9 - 13 Parung - Bogor Production



77. Drs. Dave Lumenta Antropolog I Pemerhati Masalah - Masalah Kebudayaan (Freelance) Alam Permai B - 4 Oepok 16431

78. Ir. Daru Asycarya lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Perkantoran Menara Era, Suite 703, JI. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta 10410

79. Ir. Asep Sugih Suntana lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Perkantoran Menara Era, Suite 703, JI. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta 10410

80. Ir. Alan Purbawiyatna lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Perkantoran Menara Era, Suite 703, JI. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta 10410

81. Wibowo A. Djatmiko Latin JI. Citarum B XI/12 Bogor Baru - Sogor 16152 Telp. 0251-379143, 379167 Fax. 0251-379825

82. Ir. Triyan Aidilfitri PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo 1 O·h floor JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta 12780 Telp. 021-7983666 Ext. 1025 Fax. 021-7987015

83. Ir. Taufik Margani PT. Mutuagung lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994

84. Ir. Hendrayus PT. Tanindo Gedung Jasa Tania JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp.021-3900683 Fax. 021-3900683

85. Jati Asmara PT. SetyaMltra Shakti Persada JI. H. Nawi No. 6 Kebayoran Saru Jakarta Telp.021-7654523 Fax. 021-4890521

86. Zaenal Arifin Pro Natres Development

89. Ir. M. Haris Witjaksono

90. Fernandus Agung PMW

91. M. Yusup Napiri

92. Nawa Irianto

JI. Melati Raya Slok T-V No. 5 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Sogor 16610

PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp. 021-7983666Fax. 021-7987011 SFMP-GTZ Kantor SAPPEDA TK I Samarinda Kalimantan Timur PO.SOX 1087 Samarinda 75123 Telp. 0541-33434, 33473

Yayasan Sylvalestari Indonesia JI. Melati Raya Blok T-V No. 2 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Sogor 16610 Telp.0251-636205 Fax.0251-634327

PT. PT. Access Centrakarya Komplek Villa Sogor Indah Slok F3 No. 22 Sogor16710

Social

Production

Telp. 0251-660751 Fax. 0251-319041 Production

93. Lukman Mulyanto PT. Sarbi Moerhani lestari JI. Raya Taman Pagelaran SlokF-1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor16610 Telp.0251-634086, 635464, 634232 Fax. 0251-634232



77. Drs. Dave Lumenta Antropolog I Pemerhati Masalah - Masalah Kebudayaan (Freelance) Alam Permai B - 4 Oepok 16431

78. Ir. Daru Asycarya lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Perkantoran Menara Era, Suite 703, JI. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta 10410

79. Ir. Asep Sugih Suntana lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Perkantoran Menara Era, Suite 703, JI. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta 10410

80. Ir. Alan Purbawiyatna lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Perkantoran Menara Era, Suite 703, JI. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta 10410

81. Wibowo A. Djatmiko Latin JI. Citarum B XI/12 Bogor Baru - Sogor 16152 Telp. 0251-379143, 379167 Fax. 0251-379825

82. Ir. Triyan Aidilfitri PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo 1 O·h floor JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta 12780 Telp. 021-7983666 Ext. 1025 Fax. 021-7987015

83. Ir. Taufik Margani PT. Mutuagung lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E 16-18 JI. Wijaya 11 Jakarta 12160 Telp.021-7210280 Fax. 021-7802994

84. Ir. Hendrayus PT. Tanindo Gedung Jasa Tania JI. Cik Ditiro 14 Jakarta Pusat Telp.021-3900683 Fax. 021-3900683

85. Jati Asmara PT. SetyaMltra Shakti Persada JI. H. Nawi No. 6 Kebayoran Saru Jakarta Telp.021-7654523 Fax. 021-4890521

86. Zaenal Arifin Pro Natres Development

89. Ir. M. Haris Witjaksono

90. Fernandus Agung PMW

91. M. Yusup Napiri

92. Nawa Irianto

JI. Melati Raya Slok T-V No. 5 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Sogor 16610

PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo Lt. 12 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta Selatan Telp. 021-7983666Fax. 021-7987011 SFMP-GTZ Kantor SAPPEDA TK I Samarinda Kalimantan Timur PO.SOX 1087 Samarinda 75123 Telp. 0541-33434, 33473

Yayasan Sylvalestari Indonesia JI. Melati Raya Blok T-V No. 2 Taman Pagelaran Ciomas Sogor 16610 Telp.0251-636205 Fax.0251-634327

PT. PT. Access Centrakarya Komplek Villa Sogor Indah Slok F3 No. 22 Sogor16710

Social

Production

Telp. 0251-660751 Fax. 0251-319041 Production

93. Lukman Mulyanto PT. Sarbi Moerhani lestari JI. Raya Taman Pagelaran SlokF-1 No. 3-5 Ciomas Bogor16610 Telp.0251-634086, 635464, 634232 Fax. 0251-634232


I I I I I'

~'-: -;:

I I I. I I I" I I I I I I I I I

/l 94. Semiarto Aji purwanto Jurusan Antropologi, Fisip UI Kampus UI Depok Telp. 021-7870348, 77781032 Fax. 021-7872820

95. Ngadiono PT. Aji Buana Asri PO. Box 270 Bogor Telp. 0251-621656,621133 Fax. 0251-621137

96. Yohanes Budi Sulistioadi GTZ-SFMP Gedung Bappeda Tk.1 JI. Kusuma Bangsa Samarinda TLP.0541-733434 FAX.0541-733437 Production

97. Edi Sudiono GTZ-SFMP Gedung Bappeda Tk.1 JI. Kusuma Bangsa Samarinda TLP. 0541-733434 FAX.0541-733437 Social

98. Herryadi GTZ-SFMP Gedung Bappeda Tk.1 JI. Kusuma Bangsa Samarinda TLP. 0541-733434 FAX.0541-733437 Ecology

99. Teguh Widodo Balai Eksploitasi Hutan dan Pengujian Hasil Hutan Wilayah XI Samarinda. JI. MT. Haryono Samarinda Tip. 0541- 743905 FAX.0541-7334379 Production

100. Hendri Nurwnato Yayasan Sylvalestari Indonesia Tip. 0251-636205 Fax. 0251-634327 Ecology

101. Hery Romadan PLASMA (fkd kalimantan) JI Juanda I No.8 Samarinda-kalimantan timur Ph I Fax: 0541-39071 Social

102. Zaenal Abidin PT. Forestcitra Sejahtera (Focus) JI. Raya Bogor Km. 33.5 No. 19 Cimanggis, Jakarta 12560 Social

103. Thomas Hidayat K PT. Forestcitra Sejahtera (Focus) JI. Raya Bogor Km. 33.5 No. 19 Cimanggis, Jakarta 12560 Tel. 021-87740762 Fax.021-87740766 Production

104. Yang Suwan Peneliti masalah-masalah Sosial Jln. H Abdulgani 52. Kampung Utan Ciputat 15412 Jakarta Selatan Telpon/Fax: 021-7431022 Social

105. Nenie Afwani PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Tower B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343 Ecology

106. Harry Saptaji PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Tower B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343 Production

107. Rochana PT. Binareka Alamlestari Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Lt. 6B JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2607 Fax.021-5306343 Production

108. Wahyudi PT. Binareka Alamlestari Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Lt. 6B JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2603 Fax.021-5306343 Social


I I

I I'

~'-: -;:

I I I. I

I I I I I I I I I

/l 94. Semiarto Aji purwanto Jurusan Antropologi, Fisip UI Kampus UI Depok Telp. 021-7870348, 77781032 Fax. 021-7872820

95. Ngadiono PT. Aji Buana Asri PO. Box 270 Bogor Telp. 0251-621656,621133 Fax. 0251-621137

96. Yohanes Budi Sulistioadi GTZ-SFMP Gedung Bappeda Tk.1 JI. Kusuma Bangsa Samarinda TLP.0541-733434 FAX.0541-733437 Production

97. Edi Sudiono GTZ-SFMP Gedung Bappeda Tk.1 JI. Kusuma Bangsa Samarinda TLP. 0541-733434 FAX.0541-733437 Social

98. Herryadi GTZ-SFMP Gedung Bappeda Tk.1 JI. Kusuma Bangsa Samarinda TLP. 0541-733434 FAX.0541-733437 Ecology

99. Teguh Widodo Balai Eksploitasi Hutan dan Pengujian Hasil Hutan Wilayah XI Samarinda. JI. MT. Haryono Samarinda Tip. 0541- 743905 FAX.0541-7334379 Production

100. Hendri Nurwnato Yayasan Sylvalestari Indonesia Tip. 0251-636205 Fax. 0251-634327 Ecology

101. Hery Romadan PLASMA (fkd kalimantan) JI Juanda I No.8 Samarinda-kalimantan timur Ph I Fax: 0541-39071 Social

102. Zaenal Abidin PT. Forestcitra Sejahtera (Focus) JI. Raya Bogor Km. 33.5 No. 19 Cimanggis, Jakarta 12560 Social

103. Thomas Hidayat K PT. Forestcitra Sejahtera (Focus) JI. Raya Bogor Km. 33.5 No. 19 Cimanggis, Jakarta 12560 Tel. 021-87740762 Fax.021-87740766 Production

104. Yang Suwan Peneliti masalah-masalah Sosial Jln. H Abdulgani 52. Kampung Utan Ciputat 15412 Jakarta Selatan Telpon/Fax: 021-7431022 Social

105. Nenie Afwani PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Tower B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343 Ecology

106. Harry Saptaji PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Tower B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343 Production

107. Rochana PT. Binareka Alamlestari Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Lt. 6B JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2607 Fax.021-5306343 Production

108. Wahyudi PT. Binareka Alamlestari Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Lt. 6B JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2603 Fax.021-5306343 Social



.-1:.7'

109. Yayan Ridwan

110. Suprapto

111. A. Hilman Fauzi

PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo Lt. 10 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta 12780 Tel. 021- 021-7983666 ext. 1025 Fax. 021-7987015



112. Dyah Sri Sulistyani PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Wisma Indah Kiat JI. Raya Serpong Km. 8 Tangerang

Ecology

Production

Production

Tel. 021-53120001 - 3 Fax. 021-53120362 Ecology

113. Kuntiyadi PT. Sumalindo Lestari Jaya 11 JI. Ciptomangunkusumo - Senkotek Loa Janan Tel. 0541-281287 Fax. 0541-260821 Production

114. M. Reza Pt. Sumalindo Lestari Jaya II JI. Ciptomangunkusumo - Sengkotek Loa Janan Tel. 0541-261277Fax.0541-260821 Ecology

115. Tatik Suhartati Fakutlas Kehutanan INSTIPER JI. Nangka II Maguwoharjo Depok - Sleman, Yogyakarta Tel. 0274- 885580 Fax.0274-885479 Production

116. Zulhadi PT. Arara Abadi JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320 Production

117. M. Syarif Hidayat PT. Arara Abadi JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320 Ecology

118. Agung Nugroho PT. Kalimanis Group Wisma Kalimanis Lt. 10 JI. MT. Haryono Kav. 33 Jakarta. Tel. 021-7985929 Fax.021-7985894 Ecology

119. Dwi Sumardiyono PT. Dwimajaya Utama Plaza Dwima Lantai 5 JI. A. Yani Kav. 67 Jakarta 10510 Tel. 021-4206501 Fax.021-4206564 Production

120. A. Mujetahed M. Harian Yayasan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan (YP2K) Makassar JI. Kesejahteraan Raya No. 194 Bumi Tamalanrea Permai Makassar Tel. 0411-580925 Production

121. Firmansyah PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga Unit I (BC) Camp Bakanon - Kalimantan Tengah Ecology

122. Zulkifli PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga JI. Brigjen H. Hasan Basri No. 32A Kayu Tangi - Banjarmasin Tel. 0511-302919 Fax. 0511-302906 Production

123. Ady Virnadi PT. Daya Sakti Krida Unggul



109. Yayan Ridwan

110. Suprapto

111. A. Hilman Fauzi




112. Dyah Sri Sulistyani PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Wisma Indah Kiat JI. Raya Serpong Km. 8 Tangerang

Ecology

Production

Production

Tel. 021-53120001 - 3 Fax. 021-53120362 Ecology

113. Kuntiyadi PT. Sumalindo Lestari Jaya 11 JI. Ciptomangunkusumo - Senkotek Loa Janan Tel. 0541-281287 Fax. 0541-260821 Production

114. M. Reza Pt. Sumalindo Lestari Jaya II JI. Ciptomangunkusumo - Sengkotek Loa Janan Tel. 0541-261277Fax.0541-260821 Ecology

115. Tatik Suhartati Fakutlas Kehutanan INSTIPER JI. Nangka II Maguwoharjo Depok - Sleman, Yogyakarta Tel. 0274- 885580 Fax.0274-885479 Production

116. Zulhadi PT. Arara Abadi JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320 Production

117. M. Syarif Hidayat PT. Arara Abadi JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320 Ecology

118. Agung Nugroho PT. Kalimanis Group Wisma Kalimanis Lt. 10 JI. MT. Haryono Kav. 33 Jakarta. Tel. 021-7985929 Fax.021-7985894 Ecology

119. Dwi Sumardiyono PT. Dwimajaya Utama Plaza Dwima Lantai 5 JI. A. Yani Kav. 67 Jakarta 10510 Tel. 021-4206501 Fax.021-4206564 Production

120. A. Mujetahed M. Harian Yayasan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan (YP2K) Makassar JI. Kesejahteraan Raya No. 194 Bumi Tamalanrea Permai Makassar Tel. 0411-580925 Production

121. Firmansyah PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga Unit I (BC) Camp Bakanon - Kalimantan Tengah Ecology

122. Zulkifli PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga JI. Brigjen H. Hasan Basri No. 32A Kayu Tangi - Banjarmasin Tel. 0511-302919 Fax. 0511-302906 Production

123. Ady Virnadi PT. Daya Sakti Krida Unggul


I I

::.;,":;.

I . ;'

>:-C'V

p -/,~:>.-;-

". ~ ·~~2~< :~ ;.Fr- ~ "_<

I:~~; ;-.,-:;};.~

.;1; I:rl~~~~' " 'Z;;<,~:;::- .

--''';.~ "

:)1, I 11j~2'

I I I I I I I I I I

,f ,','

124. Tri Agus Suryono

Wisma BSG Lantai 9 JI. Abdul Muis No. 40 Jakarta Tel. 021-3505380 Fax. 021-3505381

PT. Oaya Sakti Krida Unggul Wisma BSG Lantai 9 JI. Abdul Muis No. 40 Jakarta Tel. 021-3505380 Fax. 021-3505381

125. Bisri Mustopa PT. Carus Indonesia JI. Camar Raya No. 118-119 Palangkaraya - Kalteng

Production

Ecology

Tel. 0536-21684 Fax. 0536-22770 Ecology

126. Khairul Azmi Yayasan PASE (fkd region sumatera) JI. Singgah Mata No. 18 Blower Banda Aceh 23243 Tel. 0651-46001 Social

127. Lukman Yunus Fakultas Pertanian Unhalu Kendari JI. Sungai Lahumbuti No. 6 Benu - Benua Kendari Tel. 0401-326538 . PT. FORINOO BANGUNKONSULTAN JI. Babakan Sirna No. 13 Bogor Tel. 0251-384162 Social

128. Yudi Iskandarsyah Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia Menara Era Suit 703 JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458 Fax. 021-3865462 Social

129. Paramita Iswari Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia Menara Era Suit 703 JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458 Fax. 021-3865462 Social

130. Irwan Gunawan Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia Menara Era Suit 703JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458Fax. 021-3865462 Production

131. Jan Horas Veryady Purba PT. Forindo Bangunkonsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 17 No. 12A Jakarta Tel. 021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074 Social

132. Djoko Soeparijadi Jur. Manajemen Hutan Fakultas Kehutanan UGM Kampus UGM Bulaksumur Tel. 0274-901420 Fax. 021-901425 Production

133. Yusdhistira Syarendra PT. Gunung Meranti Redtop Square Blok 0-9 JI. Pecenongan 72 Jakarta 10120 Tel. 021-3501739, 3859856 - 8 Fax.021-5642057 Social

134. M. Nur Hidayat PT. Mapindo Parama JI. Mabes Hankam No. 60 Ceger Jakarta Timur 13820 Tel. 021-8450777 ext. 418 Fax.021-8450779 Production

135. Dwiyantini Peniyati PT. Mapindo Pratama JI. Mabes Hankam No. 60 Ceger Jakarta Timur 13820 Tel. 021-8450777 ext. 418 Fax.021-8450779 Ecology

136. Rudy R. Lumuru Yayasan Evergreen Indonesia (FKO Region sulawesi) JI .S. Sausu No. 5 Palu - Sulteng Tel. 0451-424354 Fax.0451-423139 Social

137. Lyndon B. Pangkali WWF Sahul Bioregion Irian Jaya (fkd region papua)


I I

I I I I I I I I I

124. Tri Agus Suryono

Wisma BSG Lantai 9 JI. Abdul Muis No. 40 Jakarta Tel. 021-3505380 Fax. 021-3505381

PT. Oaya Sakti Krida Unggul Wisma BSG Lantai 9 JI. Abdul Muis No. 40 Jakarta Tel. 021-3505380 Fax. 021-3505381

125. Bisri Mustopa PT. Carus Indonesia JI. Camar Raya No. 118-119 Palangkaraya - Kalteng

Production

Ecology

Tel. 0536-21684 Fax. 0536-22770 Ecology

126. Khairul Azmi Yayasan PASE (fkd region sumatera) JI. Singgah Mata No. 18 Blower Banda Aceh 23243 Tel. 0651-46001 Social

127. Lukman Yunus Fakultas Pertanian Unhalu Kendari JI. Sungai Lahumbuti No. 6 Benu - Benua Kendari Tel. 0401-326538 . PT. FORINOO BANGUNKONSULTAN JI. Babakan Sirna No. 13 Bogor Tel. 0251-384162 Social

128. Yudi Iskandarsyah Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia Menara Era Suit 703 JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458 Fax. 021-3865462 Social

129. Paramita Iswari Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia Menara Era Suit 703 JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458 Fax. 021-3865462 Social

130. Irwan Gunawan Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia Menara Era Suit 703JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458Fax. 021-3865462 Production

131. Jan Horas Veryady Purba PT. Forindo Bangunkonsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 17 No. 12A Jakarta Tel. 021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074 Social

132. Djoko Soeparijadi Jur. Manajemen Hutan Fakultas Kehutanan UGM Kampus UGM Bulaksumur Tel. 0274-901420 Fax. 021-901425 Production

133. Yusdhistira Syarendra PT. Gunung Meranti Redtop Square Blok 0-9 JI. Pecenongan 72 Jakarta 10120 Tel. 021-3501739, 3859856 - 8 Fax.021-5642057 Social

134. M. Nur Hidayat PT. Mapindo Parama JI. Mabes Hankam No. 60 Ceger Jakarta Timur 13820 Tel. 021-8450777 ext. 418 Fax.021-8450779 Production

135. Dwiyantini Peniyati PT. Mapindo Pratama JI. Mabes Hankam No. 60 Ceger Jakarta Timur 13820 Tel. 021-8450777 ext. 418 Fax.021-8450779 Ecology

136. Rudy R. Lumuru Yayasan Evergreen Indonesia (FKO Region sulawesi) JI .S. Sausu No. 5 Palu - Sulteng Tel. 0451-424354 Fax.0451-423139 Social

137. Lyndon B. Pangkali WWF Sahul Bioregion Irian Jaya (fkd region papua)


~,".

I~:···C." ........ C: .•• -., . .'

.-'.'

.' .)j'

I";; ,

I I I I I I I

JI. Garuda No. 24 Sepadem Merauke - Papua TeI/Fax.0971-321831

138. Mulyadi K Biodiversity Conservation Indonesia JL Johar No. 30 Sindang Barang Koperasi -BaGaR 16610 Fax: 0251-625828 Te1.0251-628165

139. Lillo Srijono Wibowo PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo Lt. 10 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta 12780 Tel. 021- 021-7983666 ext. 1025 Fax. 021-7987015

140. Deni Kusindarto, s.hut. PT. Centra Multicon Jaya Puri Sentra Niaga Blok B-30 JI. Raya Kali Malang Jakarta Timur

141. Bambang Mardi P. Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Terapi 11 Blok BM No. 9 Bogor - 16111 Telp.0251-337485

142. Hery Setiawan PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga JI. Brigjen H. Hasan Bisri No. 32A Kayu Tangi-Banjarmasin Telp. 0511 - 302919 Fax. 0511 - 302906


Ecology

Ecology

Ecology

Production

Ecology

Production

I I

138. Mulyadi K

139. Lillo Srijono Wibowo

140. Deni Kusindarto, s.hut.

141. Bambang Mardi P.

142. Hery Setiawan

JI. Garuda No. 24 Sepadem Merauke - Papua TeI/Fax.0971-321831

Biodiversity Conservation Indonesia JL Johar No. 30 Sindang Barang Koperasi -BaGaR 16610 Fax: 0251-625828 Te1.0251-628165


PT. Centra Multicon Jaya Puri Sentra Niaga Blok B-30 JI. Raya Kali Malang Jakarta Timur

Bumi Menteng Asri JI. Terapi 11 Blok BM No. 9 Bogor - 16111 Telp.0251-337485

PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga JI. Brigjen H. Hasan Bisri No. 32A Kayu Tangi-Banjarmasin Telp. 0511 - 302919 Fax. 0511 - 302906


Ecology

Ecology

Ecology

Production

Ecology

Production

- ~"-"""-"'''-'''''- ... -.' .. ---'~'- •. ,.- .. - -'.; 'i' "',' .;" "'at >~'\t,t ,; ;i.~;i;;\,i\:,:,~!,;,,;;~;~ir;:;;:(~G:;'.:~i\:~~~!;);(1~:i~:!~:t:;:~H~1;)i~;: i .••• ',' .

. .- ':' '" ;",.:" ."., ',-, ·i,~:J:;,,:. ~ "\ .;. :-' -

• ~ :;' :;'

IQ

tJ ID (§ .g r-3 _. ID en ~ 0 r+ ::> ),. 0 en en ....., ID en

-I en 3 ID .., ~ m tu 0

» ..."

>< ::l en c::

"'C (I) -0 en ID :;' (I) C. -0 ID

~ CD 0-

C CD ::J cl' ""C (I) Q. <il

tu 0 ~ _. >< ~ ::l en I\.) ::> (I) _. ID

0 IQ ID 3 ::l ID ~ s: :;' ::;-

tu g. ~ ::>

ID _. en Qi' ::l

(,Q

- ~"-"""-"'''-'''''- ... -.' .. ---'~'- •. ,.- .. - -'.; 'i' "',' .;" "'at >~'\t,t ,; ;i.~;i;;\,i\:,:,~!,;,,;;~;~ir;:;;:(~G:;'.:~i\:~~~!;);(1~:i~:!~:t:;:~H~1;)i~;: i .••• ',' .

. .- ':' '" ;",.:" ."., ',-, ·i,~:J:;,,:. ~ "\ .;. :-' -

• ~ :;' :;'

IQ

tJ ID (§ .g r-3 _. ID en ~ 0 r+ ::> ),. 0 en en ....., ID en

-I en 3 ID .., ~ m tu 0

» ..."

>< ::l en c::

"'C (I) -0 en ID :;' (I) C. -0 ID

~ CD 0-

C CD ::J cl' ""C (I) Q. <il

tu 0 ~ _. >< ~ ::l en I\.) ::> (I) _. ID

0 IQ ID 3 ::l ID ~ s: :;' ::;-

tu g. ~ ::>

ID _. en Qi' ::l

(,Q

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I:

I I I

I

//

LIST OF EXPERTS PANEL THE INDONESIAN ECOLABELLING INSTITUTE

NO. NAME ADDRESS FIELD OF EXPERTISE

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1. Jeffrey Hayword Smartwood, International

Program Associate 61 Millet ST Richmond, VT 05417 Telp : 802-4345491 Fax: 802-4343116 e-mail: [email protected]

2. Jim Jarvie JI. Tengku Umar 36 Surabaya 60264 Jawa Timur Telp : 031-5682590 Fax: 031-336131 e-mail: [email protected]

3. lan Rowland LSTllndonesia, Duta Pakuan E-1/10 Bogor 16144 Telp : 0251-372402 e-mail: [email protected]

4. Chairil Anwar Siregar Puslitbang Hutan dan Komunikasi Alam Bogor, JI. Gunung Batu No. 5 Telp : 0251-325111 Fax: 0251-376168 e-mail: [email protected]

5. Nana S. Sumarna Latin - Bogor, JI. Citarum Telp : 0251-379143 Fax: 0251-374167 e-mail: [email protected]

6. Ari Wibowo Pusat Litbang Hutan dan Konservasi Alam, JI. Gunung Batu 5 Bogor Telp : 0251-316005 e-mail: [email protected]

7. Johanis P. Mogea Kantor: Herbarium Bogor-Puslitbang Biologi L1PI, JI. Ir. H Juanda 22 Bogor Telp : 0251-322035 e-mail: [email protected]

8. Wibowo A. Djatmiko (Smartwood Representative) Latin, JI. Citarum B X1I12, Bogor Baru, 16152 Telp : 0251-379143,379167 Fax: 0251-379825 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

9. Harry Seldadyo JI. Tebet Timur Dalam VIII-X/2 Jakarta 12820 Telp : 021-8356863, HP.0816-454540 e-mail: [email protected]. [email protected]

10. Tri Nugroho (Smartwood Representative) Latin, JI. Citarum B X1I12, Bogor Baru, BO 16.152 Telp: 0251-379143, 379167 Fax: 0251-379825 e-mail: [email protected]


Management Certification

Ecology

Management

Ecology

Management

Management

Management

Ecology

Social Economy

Sosial Policy

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I

I

LIST OF EXPERTS PANEL THE INDONESIAN ECOLABELLING INSTITUTE

NO. NAME ADDRESS FIELD OF EXPERTISE

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1. Jeffrey Hayword Smartwood, International

Program Associate 61 Millet ST Richmond, VT 05417 Telp : 802-4345491 Fax: 802-4343116 e-mail: [email protected]

2. Jim Jarvie JI. Tengku Umar 36 Surabaya 60264 Jawa Timur Telp : 031-5682590 Fax: 031-336131 e-mail: [email protected]

3. lan Rowland LSTllndonesia, Duta Pakuan E-1/10 Bogor 16144 Telp : 0251-372402 e-mail: [email protected]

4. Chairil Anwar Siregar Puslitbang Hutan dan Komunikasi Alam Bogor, JI. Gunung Batu No. 5 Telp : 0251-325111 Fax: 0251-376168 e-mail: [email protected]

5. Nana S. Sumarna Latin - Bogor, JI. Citarum Telp : 0251-379143 Fax: 0251-374167 e-mail: [email protected]

6. Ari Wibowo Pusat Litbang Hutan dan Konservasi Alam, JI. Gunung Batu 5 Bogor Telp : 0251-316005 e-mail: [email protected]

7. Johanis P. Mogea Kantor: Herbarium Bogor-Puslitbang Biologi L1PI, JI. Ir. H Juanda 22 Bogor Telp : 0251-322035 e-mail: [email protected]

8. Wibowo A. Djatmiko (Smartwood Representative) Latin, JI. Citarum B X1I12, Bogor Baru, 16152 Telp : 0251-379143,379167 Fax: 0251-379825 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

9. Harry Seldadyo JI. Tebet Timur Dalam VIII-X/2 Jakarta 12820 Telp : 021-8356863, HP.0816-454540 e-mail: [email protected]. [email protected]

10. Tri Nugroho (Smartwood Representative) Latin, JI. Citarum B X1I12, Bogor Baru, BO 16.152 Telp: 0251-379143, 379167 Fax: 0251-379825 e-mail: [email protected]


Management Certification

Ecology

Management

Ecology

Management

Management

Management

Ecology

Social Economy

Sosial Policy

I I 1·.·····-,".,

;- :X~:·:~·-_

I·.?·.·.··.··· .•. ~~- ':.'

.;;\;;"

-:~-<-I· ............ .

1'\ I' .. '.£'

':.

~ .--

I~. 1:-:

I } ,.~\.

I ······· !1'··

I I I I I I I I I I

11. SeottA. Stanley Proyek Hukum GP Harvard/LTFE Kotak Pos 1120 Pontianak Telp : 0561-410118 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

12. Dwi rahmad Muhtaman (Smartwood Representative) Latin, JI. Citarum S X1I12, Sogor Saru, SO 16.152 Telp : 0251-379143, 337417 e-mail: [email protected] Social

13. Yang Suwan, MA Taman Nasional Rinjani Project Telp. 0370-636280 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Social

14. Ir. Gunawan Santosa Institut Pertanian Sogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-621285 Production

15. Ir. Siswoyo, Msi Institut Pertanian Sogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-620121 Fax. : 0251-621256 Ecology

16. Ir. Dones Rinaldi, MSc Kantor: Institut Pertanian Sogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-623948 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

17. DR. Nunuk Supriyatno Kantor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Univ. Gajah Mada Yogyakarta Telp. : 0274-901425 Fax. : 0274-901420 Production

18. OR. Sri Danarto Kantor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Univ. Gajah Mada Yogyakarta Telp. : 0274-901420 Fax.: 0274-902220 Production

19. Ir. H. Iman Kuneoro HS.,M.Se Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Mulawarman, Kampus Gunung Ketua Jln. Ki Hajar Dewantoro Samarinda Kalimantan Timur Telp. : 0541-735089 Fax.: 0541-735379 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

20. Dr.lr. Yosep Ruslim, M.Se Fakultas Kehutanan Univ. Mulyawarman + SFMP-GTZ PO.SOX 1087 Telp. : 0541-733434 Fax.: 0541-733437 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Production

21. Ir. Anwar Umar, MS Fakultas Pertanian & Kehutanan Univ. Hasanudin Tamalanrea, JI. P. Kemerdekaan Ujung Pandang Telp. : 0411-585917/586014/586200 Fax. : 0411-510917

22. Zahedi (Didi Charamsar) Yayasan Leuser Lestari Jln. Samanhudi LK IV/19 Medan 20152 Telp. : 061 - 4158565 e-mail:[email protected] Social

23. Ir. Sugeng Wahyudiono, MP Institut Pertanian Stiper Yogyakarta Fakultas Kehutanan JI. Nangka 11, Maguwoharjo, Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55000 Telp. : 0274-885580, 885478, 885479 Fax. :0274-885479 e-mail: [email protected]


I I I ··.····' ,'-.,

;." -

I ···.·.··.'.··.·· c, -,

.-;".

I ··'········' !r··

I;

I I I I I

11. ScottA. Stanley Proyek Hukum GP Harvard/LTFE Kotak Pos 1120 Pontianak Telp : 0561-410118 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

12. Dwi rahmad Muhtaman (Smartwood Representative) Latin, JI. Citarum S X1I12, Sogor Saru, SO 16.152 Telp : 0251-379143, 337417 e-mail: [email protected] Social

13. Yang Suwan, MA Taman Nasional Rinjani Project Telp. 0370-636280 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Social

14. Ir. Gunawan Santosa Institut Pertanian Sogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-621285 Production

15. Ir. Siswoyo, Msi Institut Pertanian Sogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-620121 Fax. : 0251-621256 Ecology

16. Ir. Dones Rinaldi, MSc Kantor: Institut Pertanian Sogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-623948 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

17. DR. Nunuk Supriyatno Kantor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Univ. Gajah Mada Yogyakarta Telp. : 0274-901425 Fax. : 0274-901420 Production

18. OR. Sri Danarto Kantor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Univ. Gajah Mada Yogyakarta Telp. : 0274-901420 Fax.: 0274-902220 Production

19. Ir. H. Iman Kuncoro HS.,M.Sc Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Mulawarman, Kampus Gunung Ketua Jln. Ki Hajar Dewantoro Samarinda Kalimantan Timur Telp. : 0541-735089 Fax.: 0541-735379 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

20. Dr.lr. Yosep Ruslim, M.Se Fakultas Kehutanan Univ. Mulyawarman + SFMP-GTZ PO.SOX 1087 Telp. : 0541-733434 Fax.: 0541-733437 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Production

21. Ir. Anwar Umar, MS Fakultas Pertanian & Kehutanan Univ. Hasanudin Tamalanrea, JI. P. Kemerdekaan Ujung Pandang Telp. : 0411-585917/586014/586200 Fax. : 0411-510917

22. Zahedi (Didi Charamsar) Yayasan Leuser Lestari Jln. Samanhudi LK IV/19 Medan 20152 Telp. : 061 - 4158565 e-mail:[email protected] Social

23. Ir. Sugeng Wahyudiono, MP Institut Pertanian Stiper Yogyakarta Fakultas Kehutanan JI. Nangka 11, Maguwoharjo, Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55000 Telp. : 0274-885580, 885478, 885479 Fax. :0274-885479 e-mail: [email protected]


I I

I I I I I I I I

/ ,t< "24. Ir. Surodjo T. Andayani, MP Institut Pertanian Stiper Yogyakarta Fakultas Kehutanan

JI. Nangka 11, Maguwoharjo, Oepok, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55000 Telp. : 0274-885580,885478, 885479 Fax. : 0274-885479

25. Hendrayanto

e-mail: [email protected]

Institut Pertanian Bogor,Fakultas Kehutanan, Telp. : 0251-621152

26. Hery Purnomo, Ph.D Institut Pertanian Bogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-360117, HP. 0818-102723 e-mail: [email protected]

27. Ir. Laode Zakaria Bapedal Prop. Sulawesi Utara, (FKO Sulawesi), Sulawesi Utara JI. Bunga Asoka No. 1

Telp. : 0421-327760

28. Mulyadi FKO Kalimantan Selatan JI. Cendana I No. 34 Kayu Tangi Banjarmasin Telp. : 0511-50392

29. S. DG. Musu Forum Komunikasi Oaerah Oesa Sibualong Kecamatan Balaesang Kabupaten Oonggola Sulawesi Tengah Telp : 0451- 424354 Fax: 0451- 424354 e-mail: [email protected]

30. Satyagraha (Birong) Sangkala, Jln. Samanhudi LK IV/19 Medan 20152 Telp. : 061 - 4158565 e-mail: [email protected]

31, Ir. Tri Joko Mulyono, MM Pusat Standarisasi dan Lingkungan Kehutanan dan Perkebunan, Oephutbun, Manggala Wanabhakti Blok 116, JI. Jend. Gatot Subroto, Senayan, Jakarta 10270 Telp: 021-5730268 Fax: 021-5733433, 5720203

32. Dr. Agus Setyarso Fakultas Kehutanan, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta Telp : 0274-901423 Fax: 0274-901420, 901425

33. Dr. Sofyan P. Warsito Fakultas Kehutanan, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta Telp: 0274-901423 Fax: 0274-901420, 901425

Production

SociallEkology

Social

Social

Social

Production

Production

e-mail: [email protected] Production

34. Ir. Hendra Masdarta Yayasan Riau Mandiri, JI. Amir Hamzah No.19, Pekanbaru, Riau Telp : 0761-36349 Fax: 0761-36349 e-mail: [email protected] Environment

35. Ir. Siswantoyo, Ms Jur. Manajemen Hutan, Fak.Kehutanan UGM, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281 Telp : 0274-901425 Fax: 0274-901420 Production

36. Adi Purwoko, Spi Yayasan Riau Mandiri, JI. Amir Hamzah No.19 Pekanbaru, Riau Telp: 0761-36349 Fax: 0761-36349, 32260 e-mail: [email protected] Social

37. Tengku Masdoelhak Assegaf Lembaga Adat Melayu Riau, Balai Adat Melayu Riau, JI. Oiponegoro NO.39 Pekanbaru, Riau 28133 Telp : 0761-22313 Social

38. Ir. Sumarjono Soedargo Jur. Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan,


I I

I I I I I I I I

/ ,t< "24. Ir. Surodjo T. Andayani, MP Institut Pertanian Stiper Yogyakarta Fakultas Kehutanan

JI. Nangka 11, Maguwoharjo, Oepok, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55000 Telp. : 0274-885580,885478, 885479 Fax. : 0274-885479

25. Hendrayanto

e-mail: [email protected]

Institut Pertanian Bogor,Fakultas Kehutanan, Telp. : 0251-621152

26. Hery Purnomo, Ph.D Institut Pertanian Bogor, Fakultas Kehutanan Telp. : 0251-360117, HP. 0818-102723 e-mail: [email protected]

27. Ir. Laode Zakaria Bapedal Prop. Sulawesi Utara, (FKO Sulawesi), Sulawesi Utara JI. Bunga Asoka No. 1

Telp. : 0421-327760

28. Mulyadi FKO Kalimantan Selatan JI. Cendana I No. 34 Kayu Tangi Banjarmasin Telp. : 0511-50392

29. S. DG. Musu Forum Komunikasi Oaerah Oesa Sibualong Kecamatan Balaesang Kabupaten Oonggola Sulawesi Tengah Telp : 0451- 424354 Fax: 0451- 424354 e-mail: [email protected]

30. Satyagraha (Birong) Sangkala, Jln. Samanhudi LK IV/19 Medan 20152 Telp. : 061 - 4158565 e-mail: [email protected]

31, Ir. Tri Joko Mulyono, MM Pusat Standarisasi dan Lingkungan Kehutanan dan Perkebunan, Oephutbun, Manggala Wanabhakti Blok 116, JI. Jend. Gatot Subroto, Senayan, Jakarta 10270 Telp: 021-5730268 Fax: 021-5733433, 5720203

32. Dr. Agus Setyarso Fakultas Kehutanan, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta Telp : 0274-901423 Fax: 0274-901420, 901425

33. Dr. Sofyan P. Warsito Fakultas Kehutanan, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta Telp: 0274-901423 Fax: 0274-901420, 901425

Production

SociallEkology

Social

Social

Social

Production

Production

e-mail: [email protected] Production

34. Ir. Hendra Masdarta Yayasan Riau Mandiri, JI. Amir Hamzah No.19, Pekanbaru, Riau Telp : 0761-36349 Fax: 0761-36349 e-mail: [email protected] Environment

35. Ir. Siswantoyo, Ms Jur. Manajemen Hutan, Fak.Kehutanan UGM, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281 Telp : 0274-901425 Fax: 0274-901420 Production

36. Adi Purwoko, Spi Yayasan Riau Mandiri, JI. Amir Hamzah No.19 Pekanbaru, Riau Telp: 0761-36349 Fax: 0761-36349, 32260 e-mail: [email protected] Social

37. Tengku Masdoelhak Assegaf Lembaga Adat Melayu Riau, Balai Adat Melayu Riau, JI. Oiponegoro NO.39 Pekanbaru, Riau 28133 Telp : 0761-22313 Social

38. Ir. Sumarjono Soedargo Jur. Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan,


I I I I I' I:

I' li I' _t,

I"i',: ! :-~,-:-~

Il:r: > ·L'

li{~": ~ :.£<

I "H' '_'i;'·

" L F ,:

;: ''.'~ - --

I"",:;

{

I ~

I I ,.

I ~ ,

I

Fahutan IPB, Kampus IPB Darmaga, PO. Box 168 Bogor 16001

39. Ir. Purwo Susanto WWF/PO Box 34 Renggat-Riau Pemda TK II Kab. Indragiri Hulu Propinsi Riau Telp : 0769-341234, 341123, 341123 Fax : 0769-341132 e-mail: [email protected] Social

40. Ors. Zulyani Hidayah,MA Asosiasi Antropolgi Indonesia, JI. Probolinggo 4, Gondangdia, Jakarta 10350 Telp : 021-3143701 Fax: 021-322435 e-mail: [email protected] Social

41. Ir. Bahruni, MS Lab. Poleksoshut, Fahutan IPB Kampus IPB Darmaga, PO.Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-623805 Fax: 0251-623805, 621244, 621256 Production

42. Ir. Sudaryanto Fahutan IPB. Kampus IPB Darmaga, PO. Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-621285 Fax: 0251-621256 Production

43. Or. Machmud Thohari VP Inter Univ. Center for Biotechnology, JI. Puspa Kampus IPB Darmaga, PO. Box 1 Bogor 16610 Telp : 0251-621257, 621724 Fax : 0251-621724 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

44. Or. Sigit Hardwinarto Kantor : Fahutan Universitas Mulawarman, Kampus Gn. Kelua, Samarinda 75123 Telp : 0541-39886 Fax : 0541-35379 Ecology

45. Ir, Niel Makinuddin, MA PLASMA, JI. Juanda I NO.8 Samarinda, Kaltim 75124 Telp : 0541-39071 Fax: 0541-39071 e-mail: [email protected] Social

46. Ir. Atmodjo Thojib, MS Fahutan UGM, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281 Telp : 0274-901420 Fax : 0274-901420 Ecology

47. Ir. H. Hamdani Adeli Universitas Lancang Kuning JI. Yos Sudarso Km.8 Rumbai, Pekanbaru, Riau Telp : 0761-44741-13, 53108 Fax : 0761-29941, 22918 Social

48. Rusmadya, Spi Yayasan Riau mandiri, JI. Amir Hamzah No.19 Pekanbaru, Riau Telp: 0761-36349 Fax: 0761-36349 Social

49. Ors Laffri Eldiny KIPPLHI - Riau JI. Bakau No. 467 Rejusari Pekan Baru (Riau) Telp : 0761-32637 Ecology

50. Ir. M. Rizal, Msi JI. Suwarno No. 25 Palangkaraya 73112 Ecology

51. Ir. Sarinah, MP JI. Damang Salilah BI.21 Kompl. Unpar, Palangkaraya 73112 Production

52. Ir. Abdul Mukti, MP JI. Krakatau No. 46, Bukit Hirdu Palangkaraya 73112 Social-

53. Or.lr. Upik Rosalina W, OEA Jurusan Manajemen Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan IPB,


I

I:

I:·

.-~,-:-~

I\[{';

li{~':

;: ''.'~ : --, "~-.

I;",

I I I ,.

I;!' .

,-

Fahutan IPB, Kampus IPB Darmaga, po. Box 168 Bogor 16001

39. Ir. Purwo Susanto WWF/PO Box 34 Renggat-Riau Pemda TK II Kab. Indragiri Hulu Propinsi Riau Telp : 0769-341234, 341123, 341123 Fax : 0769-341132 e-mail: [email protected] Social

40. Ors. Zulyani Hidayah,MA Asosiasi Antropolgi Indonesia, JI. Probolinggo 4, Gondangdia, Jakarta 10350 Telp : 021-3143701 Fax: 021-322435 e-mail: [email protected] Social

41. Ir. Bahruni, MS Lab. Poleksoshut, Fahutan IPB Kampus IPB Darmaga, PO.Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-623805 Fax: 0251-623805, 621244, 621256 Production

42. Ir. Sudaryanto Fahutan IPB. Kampus IPB Darmaga, PO. Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-621285 Fax: 0251-621256 Production

43. Or. Machmud Thohari VP Inter Univ. Center for Biotechnology, JI. Puspa Kampus IPB Darmaga, PO. Box 1 Bogor 16610 Telp : 0251-621257, 621724 Fax : 0251-621724 e-mail: [email protected] Ecology

44. Or. Sigit Hardwinarto Kantor : Fahutan Universitas Mulawarman, Kampus Gn. Kelua, Samarinda 75123 Telp : 0541-39886 Fax : 0541-35379 Ecology

45. Ir, Niel Makinuddin, MA PLASMA, JI. Juanda I NO.8 Samarinda, Kaltim 75124 Telp : 0541-39071 Fax : 0541-39071 e-mail: [email protected] Social

46. Ir. Atmodjo Thojib, MS Fahutan UGM, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281 Telp : 0274-901420 Fax : 0274-901420 Ecology

47. Ir. H. Hamdani Adeli Universitas Lancang Kuning JI. Yos Sudarso Km.8 Rumbai, Pekanbaru, Riau Telp : 0761-44741-13, 53108 Fax : 0761-29941, 22918 Social

48. Rusmadya, Spi Yayasan Riau mandiri, JI. Amir Hamzah No.19 Pekanbaru, Riau Telp: 0761-36349 Fax: 0761-36349 Social

49. Ors Laffri Eldiny KIPPLHI - Riau JI. Bakau No. 467 Rejusari Pekan Baru (Riau) Telp : 0761-32637 Ecology

50. Ir. M. Rizal, Msi JI. Suwarno No. 25 Palangkaraya 73112 Ecology

51. Ir. Sarinah, MP JI. Damang Salilah BI.21 Kompl. Unpar, Palangkaraya 73112 Production

52. Ir. Abdul Mukti, MP JI. Krakatau No. 46, Bukit Hirdu Palangkaraya 73112 Social-

53. Or.lr. Upik Rosalina W, OEA Jurusan Manajemen Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan IPB,


I I I I I I I I I I , I 1I I r

1I I I) ,

11 f

11

I

Kampus IPB Darmaga-Kotak pos 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-621677 Fax: 0251-621244

54. Ir. Bambang Sukartiko CIFOR Tip. : 0251-622622 Fax: 0251-622100 e-mail: [email protected]

55. Ir. lin Ichwadi, Msc Laboratorium Politik, Ekonomi & Sosial Kehutanan, Kampus IPB Darmaga. PO. Box 168 Bogor -16001

56. Sarwidji, SH Gedung Manggala Wanabakti JI. Gatot Subroto, Jakarta 10270 Telp : 021-5730235,8711160,8707404 Fax: 021-5720203

57. Dr. Seca Gandaseca Kampus IPB Darmaga. PO Box 168 Bogor 16001 Indonesia Telp: 0251-621285 Fax: 0251-621256 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

58. Ir. Basuki Wasis, Msi Laboratorium Pengaruh Hutan, Fahutan IPB Bogor, PO Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-622031, 621677 Fax: 0251-621256

59. Ir. Ervizal Am.Zuhud, Ms Jurusan KSH, Fakultas Kehutanan IPB Bogor Telp: 0251-621562 Fax: 0251-621562, 621256

60. DR.lr. M. Ratu Asyhari Biro KLN dan PM Setjen Dephut Gedung Manggala Wanabakti, JI. Gatot Subroto _akarta 10270 Telp: 021-5730326 Fax: 021-5730326, 5720210

61. Ir. Didik Suharjito, Ms Jurusan Manajemen Hutan Fahutan IPB Darmaga, Bogor PO Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp : 0251-621258,623805

62. Ir. Djuwadi, MS Fakultas Kehutanan UGM, BulaksumurYogyakarta 55281 Telp : 0274-901420, 901425 Fax: 0274-901420

63. Dr. Us Suwarno Saputra, Msc Direktorat Jendral Pengusahaan Hutan, Dephutbun. Gd. Manggala Wanabakti Blok I Lt.6 JI. Gatot Subroto, Jakarta 10270 Telp : 021-5730384, 5730377 Fax: 021-5730381

64. Ir. Harnios M Arief, MSc Fahutan Jurusan KSH Telp : 0251-626059; 621947 Fax: 0251-621256

65. Ir. Nyoto Santoso, DEA LPP Mangrove, JI. Pancoran Indah III No. 4 Komplek Liga Mas Indah Pancoran Jakarta Selatan 12780 Telp : 021-7990403, 7987339 Fax: 021-7990403

66. Dr. Elias Fahutan IPB Darmaga, PO Box 168 Bogor 16001

67. Budi N. Siregar 68. Sih Yuniati

Telp : 0251-628145, 621285 Fax: 0251-622202

Bina Swadaya, JI. Gunung Sahari III No. 7


Production

Production

Production

Production

Production

Ecology

Ecology

Ecology

Social

Social

Production

Ecology

Ecology

Production

I I I I I I I I I I

I 1I I r

1I li I) ,

11 f

11

I

Kampus IPB Darmaga-Kotak pos 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-621677 Fax: 0251-621244

54. Ir. Bambang Sukartiko CIFOR Tip. : 0251-622622 Fax: 0251-622100 e-mail: [email protected]

55. Ir. lin Ichwadi, Msc Laboratorium Politik, Ekonomi & Sosial Kehutanan, Kampus IPB Darmaga. PO. Box 168 Bogor -16001

56. Sarwidji, SH Gedung Manggala Wanabakti JI. Gatot Subroto, Jakarta 10270 Telp : 021-5730235,8711160,8707404 Fax: 021-5720203

57. Dr. Seca Gandaseca Kampus IPB Darmaga. PO Box 168 Bogor 16001 Indonesia Telp: 0251-621285 Fax: 0251-621256 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

58. Ir. Basuki Wasis, Msi Laboratorium Pengaruh Hutan, Fahutan IPB Bogor, PO Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp: 0251-622031, 621677 Fax: 0251-621256

59. Ir. Ervizal Am.Zuhud, Ms Jurusan KSH, Fakultas Kehutanan IPB Bogor Telp: 0251-621562 Fax: 0251-621562, 621256

60. DR.lr. M. Ratu Asyhari Biro KLN dan PM Setjen Dephut Gedung Manggala Wanabakti, JI. Gatot Subroto _akarta 10270 Telp: 021-5730326 Fax: 021-5730326, 5720210

61. Ir. Didik Suharjito, Ms Jurusan Manajemen Hutan Fahutan IPB Darmaga, Bogor PO Box 168 Bogor 16001 Telp : 0251-621258,623805

62. Ir. Djuwadi, MS Fakultas Kehutanan UGM, BulaksumurYogyakarta 55281 Telp : 0274-901420, 901425 Fax: 0274-901420

63. Dr. Us Suwarno Saputra, Msc Direktorat Jendral Pengusahaan Hutan, Dephutbun. Gd. Manggala Wanabakti Blok I Lt.6 JI. Gatot Subroto, Jakarta 10270 Telp : 021-5730384, 5730377 Fax: 021-5730381

64. Ir. Harnios M Arief, MSc Fahutan Jurusan KSH Telp : 0251-626059; 621947 Fax: 0251-621256

65. Ir. Nyoto Santoso, DEA LPP Mangrove, JI. Pancoran Indah III No. 4 Komplek Liga Mas Indah Pancoran Jakarta Selatan 12780 Telp : 021-7990403, 7987339 Fax: 021-7990403

66. Dr. Elias Fahutan IPB Darmaga, PO Box 168 Bogor 16001

67. Budi N. Siregar 68. Sih Yuniati

Telp : 0251-628145, 621285 Fax: 0251-622202

Bina Swadaya, JI. Gunung Sahari III No. 7


Production

Production

Production

Production

Production

Ecology

Ecology

Ecology

Social

Social

Production

Ecology

Ecology

Production

I I I

·-::~:.\Y

1';;,;<

·~f :~: .

Icc

....•... :-:~ .•..... ".::-} -

\~ft

I"~'C

I~r~,

I·······.·.'·.· ?;." - ".-

,->"...

I

I I I I I I I I I

Jakarta Pusat 10610 Telp : 021-4204402, 4255354 Fax: 021-4208412

69. Ir. Pudji Mulyono, Msi Jurusan IImu Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Faperta IPB JI. Raya Pajajaran Bogor 16143 Telp : 0251-328869 Fax: 0251-323496

70. Ir. Bambang S. Utomo, MDS

71. Y. Arihadi Bina Swadaya Jakarta

72. Haryo Habirono Yayasan Bina Swadaya JI. Gunung Sahari III No. 7 Jakarta Pusat Telp : 021-4204402, 4255354 Fax: 021-4208412

73. Sulistiya Ir. MP Fakultas Pertanian, Univ. Janabadra JI. Timoho 11 No. 40 Yogyakarta 55168 Telp : 0274-562716

74. Ir. Ono Sutarno, Ms PT. Radiant Utama JI. Kapten Tendean No. 24 Mampang Prapatan Jakarta Selatan 12720 Telp : 021-7191020 Ext: 256, 249

75. Awan Setya Dewanta, SE Univ. Islam Indonesia, Condongcatur, Oepok, Sleman Yogyakarta 55281 Telp : 0274-881546, 883087 Fax: 0274-882589

76. Edhie Jatmiko GTZ-SMF Samarinda

77. J. Emmed M. P. MA.,MSc Ketua Jurusan Antropologi UI, Gedung B Fisip UI, Kampus UI Oepok Telp : 021-7870348

78. Drs. Mering Ngo WWF Indonesia

79. Ir. H. Djoko S. Radite,M.S

80. Dr. Ir. Suryo Hardiwinoto

81. Semiarto Aji Purwanto, MA

e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Fakultas Kehutanan Gajah Mada, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta

Telp : 0274-902220, 901402 Fax: 0274-901420, 902220

Fakultas Kehutanan Gajah Mada, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta Telp : 0274-902220, 901402 Fax: 0274-901420, 902220

Departemen Antropology Faculty Sospol UI, Oepok 16424 Telp : 021-7870348


Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Forest Management Plan

Silviculture

Social Anthropology

I I

I}fc'

I; -. ',.-,

I I I I I I I I I

Jakarta Pusat 10610 Telp : 021-4204402, 4255354 Fax: 021-4208412

69. Ir. Pudji Mulyono, Msi Jurusan IImu Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Faperta IPB JI. Raya Pajajaran Bogor 16143 Telp : 0251-328869 Fax: 0251-323496

70. Ir. Bambang S. Utomo, MDS

71. Y. Arihadi Bina Swadaya Jakarta

72. Haryo Habirono Yayasan Bina Swadaya JI. Gunung Sahari III No. 7 Jakarta Pusat Telp : 021-4204402, 4255354 Fax: 021-4208412

73. Sulistiya Ir. MP Fakultas Pertanian, Univ. Janabadra JI. Timoho 11 No. 40 Yogyakarta 55168 Telp : 0274-562716

74. Ir. Ono Sutarno, Ms PT. Radiant Utama JI. Kapten Tendean No. 24 Mampang Prapatan Jakarta Selatan 12720 Telp : 021-7191020 Ext: 256, 249

75. Awan Setya Dewanta, SE Univ. Islam Indonesia, Condongcatur,Oepok, Sleman Yogyakarta 55281

76. Edhie Jatmiko

77. J. Emmed M. P. MA.,MSc

78. Drs. Mering Ngo

79. Ir. H. Djoko S. Radite,M.S

80. Dr. Ir. Suryo Hardiwinoto

81. Semiarto Aji Purwanto, MA

Telp : 0274-881546, 883087 Fax: 0274-882589

GTZ-SMF Samarinda

Ketua Jurusan Antropologi UI, Gedung B Fisip UI, Kampus UI Oepok Telp : 021-7870348

WWF Indonesia e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Fakultas Kehutanan Gajah Mada, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta

Telp : 0274-902220, 901402 Fax: 0274-901420, 902220

Fakultas Kehutanan Gajah Mada, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta Telp : 0274-902220, 901402 Fax: 0274-901420, 902220

Departemen Antropology Faculty Sospol UI, Oepok 16424 Telp : 021-7870348


Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Social

Forest Management Plan

Silviculture

Social Anthropology

Appendix 3

_ .. List of Trained

Chain of Custody Assessor



..

I'

I I I I I I I

Appendix 3

List of Trained Chain of Custody Assessor


I I I li~~S

<~<".: .. :.-ri.'.:-·:','

,:¥~,,:,

IC;~f

I!~' 11 I~t:r~

,--'-;~~.: "j"-

.. - :,,:~

In~~;

I···.··; .. ·· -:.~~~;::

I' I· I I I I I I I I

LIST OF CHAIN OF CUSTODY ASSESSOR THE INDONESIAN ECOLABELLING INSTITUTE

NO. NAME ADDRESS

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1. VICTOR ANTONIO AMIR, IR

2. TAUFIK MARGANI,IR

3. RUDY SETYAWAN,IR

4. DIAN SUSANTY S, IR

5. ISMU ZULFIKAR, IR.

6. AGUSTRI WARSONO, IR.

7. M. NOOR EFANSYAH

PT. Mutuagung Lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E No. 18-19 JI .wijaya 11, Kebayoran Saru Jakarta 12160 Tel. 021-7210280 Fax. 021-7202994 e-mail: [email protected]

Komp. Migas 44 No. 37 JI. Kemanggisan llir IX E Slipi Jkt 11480 Tel. 021-5304814 HP. 0811-927633


JI. H. Japat No. 37 Oepok 11 Timur 16417 West Java-Indonesia Tip. 021-7715651 HP. 0812-9037155

PT. Mutuagung Lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E No. 18-19 JI .Wijaya 11, Kebayoran Saru Jakarta 12610 Tel. 021-7210280 Fax. 021-7202994 e-mail: [email protected]

JI. Tridarma Raya No. No. 52 Pondok Labu, Jakarta Selatan Indonesia HP. 0811-160896


JI. Pondok Rumput I No. 46 Sogor West Java-Indonesia Tip. 0251-337261

PT. Forestcitra Sejahtera (Focus) JI. Raya Sogor Km. 33.5 No. 19 Cimanggis, Jakarta 12560 Tel. 021-87740762 Fax.021-87740766 E-mail: [email protected]

JI. H. Saidi Saru 26K Slok A Jakarta Selatan


Sukit Sogor Raya Slok 1/17 No. 20 Sogor


Perum bojong Oepok Saru Slok 021 No. 12 JI. Gunung Salak I Sukahati Cibinong - Sogor


I I

I~;', 11

1-I I I I I I I I

LIST OF CHAIN OF CUSTODY ASSESSOR THE INDONESIAN ECOLABELLING INSTITUTE

NO. NAME ADDRESS

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1. VICTOR ANTONIO AMIR, IR

2. TAUFIK MARGANI,IR

3. RUDY SETYAWAN,IR

4. DIAN SUSANTY S, IR

5. ISMU ZULFIKAR, IR.

6. AGUSTRI WARSONO, IR.

7. M. NOOR EFANSYAH


Komp. Migas 44 No. 37 JI. Kemanggisan llir IX E Slipi Jkt 11480 Tel. 021-5304814 HP. 0811-927633


JI. H. Japat No. 37 Oepok 11 Timur 16417 West Java-Indonesia Tip. 021-7715651 HP. 0812-9037155

PT. Mutuagung Lestari Wijaya Graha Puri Slok E No. 18-19 JI .Wijaya 11, Kebayoran Saru Jakarta 12610 Tel. 021-7210280 Fax. 021-7202994 e-mail: [email protected]

JI. Tridarma Raya No. No. 52 Pondok Labu, Jakarta Selatan Indonesia HP. 0811-160896


JI. Pondok Rumput I No. 46 Sogor West Java-Indonesia Tip. 0251-337261


JI. H. Saidi Saru 26K Slok A Jakarta Selatan


Sukit Sogor Raya Slok 1/17 No. 20 Sogor


Perum bojong Oepok Saru Slok 021 No. 12 JI. Gunung Salak I Sukahati Cibinong - Sogor



{ NENIE AFWANI

9. HARRY SAPTAJI

10. ROCHANA,IR

11. R. DJAFAR PRASMANA

12. AGUS AWALI, IR.

13. CECEP SAEPULLOH, IR.

14. ANNA MAEMUNA SUAIB

15. A. MUJETAHID M.

16. RACHMAD SANTOSO

17. NOVA RYANTO

PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Towe B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343 E-mail: [email protected]

Perumahan Pajajaran Kencana/ Pulo Armin No. 7 JI. Raya Pajajaran Bogor 16143 Tel. 0251-328822

PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Towe B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343

Puri Citayam Permai Blok C12/12 D Rawa Panjang - Bojonggede Bogor 16922 Tel. 021-8782215

PT. Binareka Alamlestari Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Lt. 6B JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2607 Fax.021-5306343

Pondok Hijau Permai Blok A 1 JI. Kenari Selatan I No. 10 Bekasi Timur Tel. 021-8226225 HP: 0812-9285908

PT. Sumalindo Lestari Jaya 11 JI .Ciptomangunkusumo - Sengkotek Loa Janan Tel. 0541-261277

JI. Delima Dalam Blok D No. 9 Samarinda HP: 0811- 557117

PT. Arara Abadi JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320

JI. Sekolah Gg. Gabus No. 2 Rumbai Pekan Baru Telp. 0761 - 524 91

PT. Kalimanis Group Wisma Kalimanis Lt. 10 JI. MT. Haryono Kav. 33 Jakarta Tel. 021-7985929 Fax.021-7985894

JI. Sindang Sari No. 39 RT. 03/07 Kel. Kebon Kalapa - Bogor 16112 HP: 0816-937757

Universitas Hasanuddin Fakultas Pertanian dan Kehutanan Jurusan Kehutanan JI. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10 Kampus UNHAS Tamalanrea - Makassar Tel/Fax. 0411-585917 E-mail:[email protected]

JI. Bau Massepe No. 2 Makassar Tel. 0411-324618 e-mail:[email protected]

Yayasan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan (YP2K) Makassar E-mail:[email protected]

JI. Kesejahteraan Raya No. 194 Bumi Tamalanrea Permai Makassar Tel. 0411-580925

PT. Satria Perkasa Agung JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320

JI. Cempaka Putih Timur XVII No. 23 Rt. 03 Rw 03 Jak?rta Pusat

PT. Dwimajaya Utama JI. A. Yani Kav. 67 Jakarta 1051 b Tel. 021-4206501 Fax.021-4206564 E-mail: [email protected]

JI. Cempaka Putih XVII No. 23 RT 03/03 Jakarta Pusat 10510 Tel. 021-4202319



{ NENIE AFWANI

9. HARRY SAPTAJI

10. ROCHANA,IR

11. R. DJAFAR PRASMANA

12. AGUS AWALI, IR.

13. CECEP SAEPULLOH, IR.

14. ANNA MAEMUNA SUAIB

15. A. MUJETAHID M.

16. RACHMAD SANTOSO

17. NOVA RYANTO

PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Towe B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343 E-mail: [email protected]

Perumahan Pajajaran Kencana/ Pulo Armin No. 7 JI. Raya Pajajaran Bogor 16143 Tel. 0251-328822

PT. Barito Pacific Timber, Tbk Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Towe B Lantai 5 JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2511 Fax.021-5306343

Puri Citayam Permai Blok C12/12 D Rawa Panjang - Bojonggede Bogor 16922 Tel. 021-8782215

PT. Binareka Alamlestari Wisma Barito Pacific Timber Lt. 6B JI. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Slipi Jakarta 11410 Tel. 021-5306711 ext. 2607 Fax.021-5306343

Pondok Hijau Permai Blok A 1 JI. Kenari Selatan I No. 10 Bekasi Timur Tel. 021-8226225 HP: 0812-9285908

PT. Sumalindo Lestari Jaya 11 JI .Ciptomangunkusumo - Sengkotek Loa Janan Tel. 0541-261277

JI. Delima Dalam Blok D No. 9 Samarinda HP: 0811- 557117

PT. Arara Abadi JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320

JI. Sekolah Gg. Gabus No. 2 Rumbai Pekan Baru Telp. 0761 - 524 91

PT. Kalimanis Group Wisma Kalimanis Lt. 10 JI. MT. Haryono Kav. 33 Jakarta Tel. 021-7985929 Fax.021-7985894

JI. Sindang Sari No. 39 RT. 03/07 Kel. Kebon Kalapa - Bogor 16112 HP: 0816-937757

Universitas Hasanuddin Fakultas Pertanian dan Kehutanan Jurusan Kehutanan JI. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10 Kampus UNHAS Tamalanrea - Makassar Tel/Fax. 0411-585917 E-mail:[email protected]

JI. Bau Massepe No. 2 Makassar Tel. 0411-324618 e-mail:[email protected]

Yayasan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan (YP2K) Makassar E-mail:[email protected]

JI. Kesejahteraan Raya No. 194 Bumi Tamalanrea Permai Makassar Tel. 0411-580925

PT. Satria Perkasa Agung JI. Raya Minas Perawang Km. 26 Desa Pinang Sebatang Kec. Siak Sri Indrapura Kab. Bengkalis - Riau Tel. 0761-91030, 91088 Fax. 0761-91320

JI. Cempaka Putih Timur XVII No. 23 Rt. 03 Rw 03 Jak?rta Pusat

PT. Dwimajaya Utama JI. A. Yani Kav. 67 Jakarta 1051 b Tel. 021-4206501 Fax.021-4206564 E-mail: [email protected]

JI. Cempaka Putih XVII No. 23 RT 03/03 Jakarta Pusat 10510 Tel. 021-4202319



" 18. FIRMANSYAH, IR.

19. ZULKIFLI, IR.

20. HERY SETIAWAN, IR.

PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga Unit I (BC) Camp Bakanon - Kalimantan Tengah Komp. Kayu Tangi Kebon Jeruk III Blok J No. 34, Banjarmasin

PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga JI. Brigjen H. Hasan Basri No. 32A Kayu Tangi -Banjarmasin Tel. 0511-302919 Fax. 0511-302906

Kr. Anyar IV No. 39 Loktabat Banjar Baru Kalimantan - Selatan

PT. Sikatan Wana Raya (BC) Camp. Kasintu - Kalteng JI. Teluk Tiram Barat RI. 06 No.18 Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan

21. MUHAMMAO SALAHUOOIN, IR. PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga Menara Global Lt. 18 JI. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 27 Jakarta Selatan Tel. 021-5270208 Fax. 021-5270216

22. BAMBANG SANTOSO, IR.

23. SIMAN SUWAOJI, IR.,MP

24. REINIER SUWANOA, S.HUT

Komp Bukit Asri Ciomas Indah Blok C21 No. 2 Bogor

PT. Kayu Waja Plaza Owima Lantai 5 JI. A. Yani Kav. 67 Jakarta 10510 Tel. 021-4206501 Fax. 021-4206564 E-mail: [email protected]

JI. Pakis Barat Blok C1/21 Pondok Hijau Permai - Bekasi 17115 Tel. 021-82411278

Institut Pertanian STIPER JI. Nagka 11, Maguwohardjo - Oepok SlemanYogyakarta Tel. 0274-885479, 885580 Fax.0274-885479 E-mail:[email protected]

On. Karangsari RT. 03/32 No. 54 Os. Wedomartani - Kec. Ngemplak Sleman - Yogyakarta

PT. Kayu Waja JI. Camar Raya No. 118-119 Palangkaraya - Kalteng Tel. 0536-21684 Fax. 0536-22770 JI. Jalak III No. 17 Palangkaraya Kalimantan Tengah

25. OIOIET WIOHY HIOAYAT,IR.,MS PT. Forindo Bangunkonsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 17 No. 12A Jakarta Tel. 021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074

26. UTOMO

27. SUGIANTO, IR.

28. YAYAN RIOWAN

29. SUPRAPTO

E-mail: [email protected]

JI. Babakan Raya IV 1112 Oarmaga - Bogor

PT. Forindo Bangunkonsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 17 No. 12A Jakarta Tel. 021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074 E-mail: [email protected]

Taman Pagelaran Blok -E4 1 No. 2 Ciomas - Bogor Telp. 0251 - 639350

Lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Menara Era Suite 703 JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458 Fax.021-3865462 e-mail:[email protected]

JI. Tebet Timur Oalam 1/16 Jakarta - 12820

PT. Sucofindo Graha Sucofindo Lt. 10 JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Kav. 34 Jakarta 12780 Tel. 021- 021-7983666 ext. 1025 Fax. 021-7987015 e-mail: [email protected]

JI. Bungur Besar 19 No. 1 RT. 01/05 Babakan - Oarmaga - Bogor


Bogor Baru 0 - 5 1 25 Bogor - Jawa Barat


I I I


" 18. FIRMANSYAH, IR.

19. ZULKIFLI, IR.

20. HERY SETIAWAN, IR.

PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga Unit I (BC) Camp Bakanon - Kalimantan Tengah Komp. Kayu Tangi Kebon Jeruk III Blok J No. 34, Banjarmasin

PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga JI. Brigjen H. Hasan Basri No. 32A Kayu Tangi -Banjarmasin Tel. 0511-302919 Fax. 0511-302906

Kr. Anyar IV No. 39 Loktabat Banjar Baru Kalimantan - Selatan

PT. Sikatan Wana Raya (BC) Camp. Kasintu - Kalteng JI. Teluk Tiram Barat Rt. 06 No.18 Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan

21. MUHAMMAO SALAHUOOIN, IR. PT. Tanjung Raya Intiga Menara Global Lt. 18 JI. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 27 Jakarta Selatan Tel. 021-5270208 Fax. 021-5270216

22. BAMBANG SANTOSO, IR.

23. SIMAN SUWAOJI, IR.,MP

24. REINIER SUWANOA, S.HUT

Komp Bukit Asri Ciomas Indah Blok C21 No. 2 Bogor

PT. Kayu Waja Plaza Owima Lantai 5 JI. A. Yani Kav. 67 Jakarta 10510 Tel. 021-4206501 Fax. 021-4206564 E-mail: [email protected]

JI. Pakis Barat Blok C1/21 Pondok Hijau Permai - Bekasi 17115 Tel. 021-82411278

Institut Pertanian STIPER JI. Nagka 11, Maguwohardjo - Oepok SlemanYogyakarta Tel. 0274-885479, 885580 Fax.0274-885479 E-mail:[email protected]

On. Karangsari RT. 03/32 No. 54 Os. Wedomartani - Kec. Ngemplak Sleman - Yogyakarta

PT. Kayu Waja JI. Camar Raya No. 118-119 Palangkaraya - Kalteng Tel. 0536-21684 Fax. 0536-22770 JI. Jalak III No. 17 Palangkaraya Kalimantan Tengah

25. OIOIET WIOHY HIOAYAT,IR.,MS PT. Forindo Bangunkonsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 17 No. 12A Jakarta Tel. 021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074

26. UTOMO

27. SUGIANTO, IR.

28. YAYAN RIOWAN

29. SUPRAPTO

E-mail: [email protected]

JI. Babakan Raya IV 1112 Oarmaga - Bogor

PT. Forindo Bangunkonsultan JI. Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 17 No. 12A Jakarta Tel. 021-7971448 Fax. 021-7973074 E-mail: [email protected]

Taman Pagelaran Blok -E4 1 No. 2 Ciomas - Bogor Telp. 0251 - 639350

Lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia Menara Era Suite 703 JI. Senen Raya 135-137 Jakarta 10410 Tel. 021-3865457, 3865458 Fax.021-3865462 e-mail:[email protected]

JI. Tebet Timur Oalam 1/16 Jakarta - 12820


JI. Bungur Besar 19 No. 1 RT. 01/05 Babakan - Oarmaga - Bogor


Bogor Baru 0 - 5 1 25 Bogor - Jawa Barat


I I I I. I

I I I I i

I I I ~

I :~

I I

10: A. HILMAN FAUZI

31. LlILO SRIJONO WIBOWO

32. MOHAMMAD NURHIDAYAT

33. TRI AGUS SURYONO

34. ADY VIRNADI

35. DWIYANTINI PENIYANTI

36. DENY KUSINDARTO

37. EDIH JAYAWIGUNA

38. DJOKO SOEPRIJADI

39. AHMAD JAENI

40. HERI SUDRAJAT


Perumahan Pinang Griya Permai JI. Anggrek Raya M 1 39 Cileduk - Cipondoh Tanggerang


JI. Wisanggeni No. 234 Dirgantara I Kp. Makasar - Halim Perdana Kusuma Jakarta Timur

PT. Mapindo Parama Tel. 021-8450777 ext. 418

Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Arwana III Blok AA4/5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Tel. 0251-635793 HP. 0811-814853

PT. Daya Sakti Krida Unggul Wisma BSG Lantai 9 JI. Abdul Muis No. 40 Jakarta Tel. 021-3505380 Fax. 021-3505381

JI. Kapt. Piere Tendean No. 158 Banjarmasin - Kalimantan Selatan Tel. 0511-252766 Fax.0511-252289



PT. MAPINDO PRATAMA JI. Mabes Hankam No. 60 Ceger - Jakarta Telp. 021 - 8450777 EXT. 418 Fax. 021 - 8450779

JI. Pancasan Atas No. 61 Bogor - 16610 Telp. 0251 - 372154

Peuri Centra Niaga JI. Raya Kalimalang Blok B-30 Jak arta Timur Telp. 021 - 8626493 Fax. 021 - 8626493

JI Haji Sainin No. 44 Rt.07/01, Palmerah Jakarta Barat - 11480

PERUM PERHUTANI KPH SUKABUMI JI. RE Martadinata No. 27 Sukabumi Telp. 0266 - 221560 Fax. 0266 - 226045

Komp.Perumahan Perhutani Cibeureum Sokaraja, Sukabumi - Jawa Barat

FAKULATAS KEHUTANAN UGM JI. Bulaksumur Yogyakarta Telp. 0274 - 901420 Fax. 0274 -901420

Karang Gayam CT VIII 139 Yogyakarta HP. 0812-2954535

PERUM PERHUTANI KPH SUKABUMI JI. R E Martadinata No. 27 Sukabumi Telp. 0266 - 221560 Fax. 0266 - 226045

Ciaul Bangkalan Rt. 03/14 Cisarua-Cikole, Kedya Sukabumi Jawa Barat


Komplek Perum Perhutani JI. R E Martadinata No 27 Sukabumi


I

I I. I;c;

I I I I I I

:~

I I

.~

10. A. HILMAN FAUZI

31. LlILO SRIJONO WIBOWO

32. MOHAMMAD NURHIDAYAT

33. TRI AGUS SURYONO

34. ADY VIRNADI

35. DWIYANTINI PENIYANTI

36. DENY KUSINDARTO

37. EDIH JAYAWIGUNA

38. DJOKO SOEPRIJADI

39. AHMAD JAENI

40. HERI SUDRAJAT


Perumahan Pinang Griya Permai JI. Anggrek Raya M 1 39 Cileduk - Cipondoh Tanggerang


JI. Wisanggeni No. 234 Dirgantara I Kp. Makasar - Halim Perdana Kusuma Jakarta Timur

PT. Mapindo Parama Tel. 021-8450777 ext. 418

Perumahan Taman Pagelaran JI. Arwana III Blok AA4/5 Ciomas Bogor 16610 Tel. 0251-635793 HP. 0811-814853





PT. MAPINDO PRATAMA JI. Mabes Hankam No. 60 Ceger - Jakarta Telp. 021 - 8450777 EXT. 418 Fax. 021 - 8450779

JI. Pancasan Atas No. 61 Bogor - 16610 Telp. 0251 - 372154

Peuri Centra Niaga JI. Raya Kalimalang Blok B-30 Jak arta Timur Telp. 021 - 8626493 Fax. 021 - 8626493

JI Haji Sainin No. 44 Rt.07/01, Palmerah Jakarta Barat - 11480

PERUM PERHUTANI KPH SUKABUMI JI. RE Martadinata No. 27 Sukabumi Telp. 0266 - 221560 Fax. 0266 - 226045

Komp.Perumahan Perhutani Cibeureum Sokaraja, Sukabumi - Jawa Barat

FAKULATAS KEHUTANAN UGM JI. Bulaksumur Yogyakarta Telp. 0274 - 901420 Fax. 0274 -901420

Karang Gayam CT VIII 139 Yogyakarta HP. 0812-2954535


Ciaul Bangkalan Rt. 03/14 Cisarua-Cikole, Kedya Sukabumi Jawa Barat


Komplek Perum Perhutani JI. R E Martadinata No 27 Sukabumi


..

• ~ 0 6' Q.

~ Ql' Q. :t-O ~ ;::;: ai' Cl>

ID (J'1

~' "-': .. "' .. - - I ~ •

~"'o\!'Io.

"tJ ::T 0 .... 0 0 '"""" » "tJ "'C ... "'C ~. CD CD ::J n 0-_ . ...... X » ~ n .... _. < _ . .... _. CD en

..

• ~ 0 6' Q.

~ Ql' Q. :t-O ~ ;::;: ai' Cl>

ID (J'1

~' "-': .. "' .. - - I ~ •

~"'o\!'Io.

"tJ ::T 0 .... 0 0 '"""" » "tJ "'C ... "'C ~. CD CD ::J n 0-_ . ...... X » ~ n .... _. < _ . .... _. CD en

I I :, ,

I ~.,-- ;

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Figure 2. LEl's and International expert discussed results obtained from the joint field evaluation of data celection manuals and explored potential, for mutual recognition between LEI and FSC on field assesment. PT. Intraca Wood's site, Central Kalimantan, Maret 11-16,2000

Figure 4. Training for Forest Assessor, and Training on Chain of Custody certification, were conducted simultaneously in Sukabumi on 10-16 and 17-19 April 2000, respectively Since then, LEI has new produced 125 forest assessors, 19 Lead Assessors, and 40 Chain of Custody assessors, and virtualy all of them are registered as professional assessors by Lembaga Ekolabel.lndonesia

• Photo of Project Activities

Figure 1. International and LEl's expert jointly visits for field evaluation of data collection manuals at PT. Intraca Wood's in Kalimantan Indonesia

Figure 3. Putting theory into practices. Training Participants applied the skills they learned from the training in a field practice. CangkuangSukabumi, west java, 10-19 April 2000

66

I I :, ,

I ~.,-- ;

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Figure 2. LEl's and International expert discussed results obtained from the joint field evaluation of data celection manuals and explored potential, for mutual recognition between LEI and FSC on field assesment. PT. Intraca Wood's site, Central Kalimantan, Maret 11-16,2000

Figure 4. Training for Forest Assessor, and Training on Chain of Custody certification, were conducted simultaneously in Sukabumi on 10-16 and 17-19 April 2000, respectively Since then, LEI has new produced 125 forest assessors, 19 Lead Assessors, and 40 Chain of Custody assessors, and virtualy all of them are registered as professional assessors by Lembaga Ekolabel.lndonesia


Figure 1. International and LEI's expert jointly visits for field evaluation of data collection manuals at PT. Intraca Wood's in Kalimantan Indonesia

Figure 3. Putting theory into practices. Training Participants applied the skills they learned from the training in a field practice. CangkuangSukabumi, west java, 10-19 April 2000

66

I I 1>:/· . , . -:~ \. - .~ .~

itf~

i~~; -x>,' :

1:<· ~, .-~>:.

I: I. I. I 1<

I I I I I I I I Fj ~i

Figure 5. LEI, Smartwood, SGS Qualifor, and GTZ in discussion about the comparative study to both LEI and FSC system in Forest certification practices. This meeting has commenced during the previous Joint Certification protocol.

Figure 7. At the Treva International Hotel, July 5, 2000, Mr. Dedi Rochadi, a senior Advisor (Expert Staff) to The minister of Forestry and Estate Crops, presented the ministry's programs. To help better understand the achieving sustainable forest management LEI-organized training and consultation on SFM in Indonesia. The forum was held on July 5, 2000 at Hotel Treva International Jakarta, and the first stage of ~ was attended by relevant govemment agencies and members of the press.


Figure 6. Workshop formulating design of a Training Institution attended by related parties

Figure 8. The final stage of the forum concerned the issues of how NGO's can contribute to monitoring of certification implementation and assisting LEI in safe-guarding the credibility of SFM assessment and certification in Indonesia, it was held in Treva International Hotel, July 11, 2000

67

I

--':<: ~~ ".

I I

1<

I I I I I I I

Fj ~i

Figure 5. LEI, Smartwood, SGS Qualifor, and GTZ in discussion about the comparative study to both LEI and FSC system in Forest certification practices. This meeting has commenced during the previous Joint Certification protocol.

Figure 7. At the Treva International Hotel, July 5, 2000, Mr. Dedi Rochadi, a senior Advisor (Expert Staff) to The minister of Forestry and Estate Crops, presented the ministry's programs. To help better understand the achieving sustainable forest management LEI-organized training and consultation on SFM in Indonesia. The forum was held on July 5, 2000 at Hotel Treva International Jakarta, and the first stage of ~ was attended by relevant govemment agencies and members of the press.


Figure 6. Workshop formulating design of a Training Institution attended by related parties

Figure 8. The final stage of the forum concerned the issues of how NGO's can contribute to monitoring of certification implementation and assisting LEI in safe-guarding the credibility of SFM assessment and certification in Indonesia, it was held in Treva International Hotel, July 11, 2000

67

I I

It ~ •••.

bi~.; ~,(~':.-.-

I'i(,

.• ~.i~.·.:_· ..• ·.~~· ;.,";'

·i~~.:~;··~-.=' -~ (, ;.f"" -;;:-.:'

1\:·' :;,"

I ,~"' .. '

I·'> ;",:;,:>

I I I ~'

I I I] .1

11

III

11.:i 1:1

"

Figure 9. The second stage of the forum enjoined gov't officials and executives of the forestry based industries (including those of the logging industry). In this forum, LEI outlined a preliminary financial cost-benefit analysis of the adoption of SFM Criteria and lridicators~ It was conducted at Treva International Hotel, July 10,2000

Figure 11. Pekanbaru, 18-19 November 1998 Regional Consultation Forum, LEI has simultaneously conducted the socialization program of Forest Certification to be addressed to local Gov"t, NGO's, and Forest Management Unit in the local area


Figure 10. Cangkuang-Sukabumi, West Java, 10-19 April 2000. Some of LEI's trained assessors. Upon regestation to a personal Registration Body, these assessor become professional assessor. There are three categories of assessors, i.e. junior assessor, assessor and. lead assessors.

Figure 12. Designing national network on SFM and Forest Certification. Currently 8 regional networking has been formed. They will take a part in public consultation concerning with LEI's certification scheme in there relevant area.

68

I I

I~r

I.·~.i.·.· .. •··.··· ):~./;,' .'.;~~-:~;.'~-= -

I' ;.f'., -;;:-,:'-;

1\:··

I··>

I I ~.

11

Figure 9. The second stage of the forum enjoined gov't officials and executives of the forestry based industries (including those of the logging industry). In this forum, LEI outlined a preliminary financial cost-benefit analysis of the adoption of SFM Criteria and lridicators~ It was conducted at Treva International Hotel, July 10,2000

Figure 11. Pekanbaru, 18-19 November 1998 Regional Consultation Forum, LEI has simultaneously conducted the socialization program of Forest Certification to be addressed to local Gov"t, NGO's, and Forest Management Unit in the local area


Figure 10. Cangkuang-Sukabumi, West Java, 10-19 April 2000. Some of LEI's trained assessors. Upon regestation to a personal Registration Body, these assessor become professional assessor. There are three categories of assessors, i.e. junior assessor, assessor and. lead assessors.

Figure 12. Designing national network on SFM and Forest Certification. Currently 8 regional networking has been formed. They will take a part in public consultation concerning with LEI's certification scheme in there relevant area.

68

I I I I I I ~·f~. "

i .'0 0 ,'

i ~,.

I t:

I I

",<

I ~,

I I I I I I I I

f~CIEla.~·uH\i ~~Mlllf.il. I£'AY~ ,!l..,lAJ;l Q.il

~laNfiAN .1II.001i' MI£RUi'~KAM .. ANQC".t. .... V' .... \WM $t~~W.A .

. ":":~.,:~~:-~~~.. • Figu , >_," ....... '., ,'.-t,,,'r" 'TI.' .,' .• -..... ", ....... ~ .--."' .......... -, ... ""~ .... -' .. -..... -~ ... --..... ,., •. -

Figure 13 and 14. Examples of LEl's promotion materials on SFM as mandated in IHO's Bali declaration. These materials have been distributed to all stakeholders in Indonesia.

Figure 16. New Mirah Hotel, May 3-4,2000 In addition to the availability of a pool of skilled and well-trained field. Assessors, the availability of adequate numbers of potential expert panel numbers is crucial for implementing LEI's sustainable forest management certification system. Using LEI's refined curriculum and manual, a wookshop training for expert panel members was held in Hotel New Mirah.


Figure 15. New Mirah Hotel, on May 3-4 2000. Recruitment of members of the Decision Making Panel through competency evaluation and desk study. LEI applies thorough eligibility criteria for candidates of Expert Panel members, including inter alia "no conflict of interest" and technical competency criteria

69

I I I I I ~';S-/ .. c

I I

•. 0 0 ,'

:~ :- .

I

I I I I I I I I

Figure 13 and 14. Examples of LEl's promotion materials on SFM as mandated in IHO's Bali declaration. These materials have been distributed to all stakeholders in Indonesia.

Figure 16. New Mirah Hotel, May 3-4,2000 In addition to the availability of a pool of skilled and well-trained field. Assessors, the availability of adequate numbers of potential expert panel numbers is crucial for implementing LEI's sustainable forest management certification system. Using LEI's refined curriculum and manual, a wookshop training for expert panel members was held in Hotel New Mirah.


Figure 15. New Mirah Hotel, on May 3-4 2000. Recruitment of members of the Decision Making Panel through competency evaluation and desk study. LEI applies thorough eligibility criteria for candidates of Expert Panel members, including inter alia "no conflict of interest" and technical competency criteria

69

I I I I I I I I I I I I I'·· I I I I I I ,

-

Figure 17 and 18. Public consultation which was conducted on the 8th of December 2001 for establishing an operational Personnel Registration Body for Personnels involved in the LEI SFM certification process. This event was followed by the relevant stakeholders.

Figure 19 and 20. Public consultation on setting up an Independent Training Institution for Personnels involved in the LEl's SFM certification process, it was held 5th December 2001 with the involvement of all relevant stakeholders.


Figure 21 : The signing by the director of LEI and the director of YBLH of accreditation certificate for independent training institution which was awarded to YBLH.

70

I I I I I I I I I I I I I···

I I I I I ,

Figure 17 and 18. Public consultation which was conducted on the 8th of December 2001 for establishing an operational Personnel Registration Body for Personnels involved in the LEI SFM certification process. This event was followed by the relevant stakeholders.

Figure 19 and 20. Public consultation on setting up an Independent Training Institution for Personnels involved in the LEl's SFM certification process, it was held 5th December 2001 with the involvement of all relevant stakeholders.


Figure 21 : The signing by the director of LEI and the director of YBLH of accreditation certificate for independent training institution which was awarded to YBLH.

70

, i .C';-

I I I I I I I~

/ .,1"

Appendix 5

List of Regional Consultation Forum Secretariat

(FKD)


Appendix 5

List of Regional Consultation Forum Secretariat

(FKD)


I

I j;

I I I I I I I ~

I I lOt.

" H

It

i! I' 1\

I ill

~~1

U j: "

~ '1.[ !i 1)

,/ REGIONAL CONSULTATION FORUM SECRETARIAT

REGION KALIMANTAN

East Kalimantan

APKSA (Aliansi Pemantau Kebijakan Sumber Daya Alam) Abrianto Amin(Koord. APKSA) JI. Juanda I NO.8 Samarinda 75124 PO BOX 1/SMRBB - Samarinda 75119 Kalimantan Timur Telp/Fax: 0541 - 39071

South Kalimantan

LPMA (Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Adat) - Borneo Selatan Mahyudi & Yasir AI Fatah(Wakil Ornop) JI. Garuda No. 67 Banjarbaru 70711 - Kalimantan Selatan Telp/Fax: (0511) 772870

PT. Aya Yayang Indonesia Anis Hamidi(Wakil Pengusaha) JI. K. P. Tendean No. 66 Banjarmasin Telp: (0518) 23479 Fax: (0518) 23480

LEWIM (Lembaga Wahana Ind Muda) Nurhalis Majid(Wakil ornop) Gg. Tera Banjarmasin Telp: (0511) 56189

Balai Konservasi SOA Banjarbaru Firdaus(Wakil Pemerintah) JI. Sei Ulin Banjarbaru Telp : (0511) 92408

Mapala Fisipioner - UNLAM Temyasa(Wakil Mahasiswa) Kampus Fisip Unlam Kayutangi - Banjarmasin

Central Kalimantan

Lembaga Masyarakat Asat Oayak Ngaju (LEMADANG) Kapuas Ewaldianson (Wakil Masyarakat Adat)Koordinator FKD Kalteng Dadahup NO.337 RT.08 Kec. Kapuas Murung - Kab. Kapuas. Telp.(0536) 24467 Yayasan Petak Danum JI. Barito No. 9 Rt. 8 Rw. 2 Kuala Kapuas Telp : (0513) 23764


I

I·~.i " H

ill

REGIONAL CONSULTATION FORUM SECRETARIAT

REGION KALIMANTAN

East Kalimantan

APKSA (Aliansi Pemantau Kebijakan Sumber Daya Alam) Abrianto Amin(Koord. APKSA) JI. Juanda I NO.8 Samarinda 75124 PO BOX 1/SMRBB - Samarinda 75119 Kalimantan Timur Telp/Fax: 0541 - 39071

South Kalimantan

LPMA (Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Adat) - Borneo Selatan Mahyudi & Yasir AI Fatah(Wakil Ornop) JI. Garuda No. 67 Banjarbaru 70711 - Kalimantan Selatan Telp/Fax: (0511) 772870

PT. Aya Yayang Indonesia Anis Hamidi(Wakil Pengusaha) JI. K. P. Tendean No. 66 Banjarmasin Telp: (0518) 23479 Fax: (0518) 23480

LEWIM (Lembaga Wahana Ind Muda) Nurhalis Majid(Wakil ornop) Gg. Tera Banjarmasin Telp: (0511) 56189

Balai Konservasi SOA Banjarbaru Firdaus(Wakil Pemerintah) JI. Sei Ulin Banjarbaru Telp : (0511) 92408

Mapala Fisipioner - UNLAM Temyasa(Wakil Mahasiswa) Kampus Fisip Unlam Kayutangi - Banjarmasin

Central Kalimantan

Lembaga Masyarakat Asat Oayak Ngaju (LEMADANG) Kapuas Ewaldianson (Wakil Masyarakat Adat)Koordinator FKD Kalteng Dadahup NO.337 RT.08 Kec. Kapuas Murung - Kab. Kapuas. Telp.(0536) 24467 Yayasan Petak Danum JI. Barito No. 9 Rt. 8 Rw. 2 Kuala Kapuas Telp : (0513) 23764


I;';

r

I I I I I I I I I

/

Yay~san Tahanjungan Tarung (YTT) Andreas H. Saputra(Wakil Ornop) JI. Elang No.11, Perumnas Lama Palangkaraya 73112 Telp : (0536)37711 Fax: (0536) 23940

Balai Eksploitasi Hutan dan Pengujian Hasil Hutan Wilayah X - Palangkaraya Imam Mulyo S. (Wakil Pemerintah) JI. Yos Sudarso No.1 A Telp. (0536) 24658

Media Kalteng M.Rusan.S.Hut(Wakil Pers) JI. A. Yani No.19 Telp: (0536) 29961 ; 28069 Fax: (0536) 29925

Jurusan Kehutanan UNPAR Agus Abdullah(Wakil Akademisi) JI. Patimura NO.17.A - Palangkaraya Telp : (0536) 29848

PT.Hutan Domas Raya Made Suarjaya(Wakil Asosiasi HPH) JI. Dr. Murjani No. 6K P. Raya Telp : (0536) 22322

REGION SUMATERA

North Sumatera

YLL(Yayasan Leuser Lestari) Fachrurraji CH. Malley & Zaehedi CH. Malley JI. Samanhudi Lk IV No.19 Medan Sumatera Utara 20152 Telp : (061) 4158565 Fax: (061) 4534364

Riau

Yayasan Peran (Yayasan Pengembangan Masyarakat Madani) Hendra Masdarta JI. Ronggowarsito No.48 Pekanbaru Telp: (0761) - 24346 AdiPurwoko JI. Sukoharjo No.29 Pekanbaru T elp : (0761) 24637


I~;

r

I I I I I I I I I

/

Yay~san Tahanjungan Tarung (YTT) Andreas H. Saputra(Wakil Ornop) JI. Elang No.11, Perumnas Lama Palangkaraya 73112 Telp : (0536)37711 Fax: (0536) 23940

Balai Eksploitasi Hutan dan Pengujian Hasil Hutan Wilayah X - Palangkaraya Imam Mulyo S. (Wakil Pemerintah) JI. Yos Sudarso No.1 A Telp. (0536) 24658

Media Kalteng M.Rusan.S.Hut(Wakil Pers) JI. A. Yani No.19 Telp: (0536) 29961 ; 28069 Fax: (0536) 29925

Jurusan Kehutanan UNPAR Agus Abdullah(Wakil Akademisi) JI. Patimura NO.17.A - Palangkaraya Telp : (0536) 29848

PT.Hutan Domas Raya Made Suarjaya(Wakil Asosiasi HPH) JI. Dr. Murjani No. 6K P. Raya Telp : (0536) 22322

REGION SUMATERA

North Sumatera

YLL(Yayasan Leuser Lestari) Fachrurraji CH. Malley & Zaehedi CH. Malley JI. Samanhudi Lk IV No.19 Medan Sumatera Utara 20152 Telp : (061) 4158565 Fax: (061) 4534364

Riau

Yayasan Peran (Yayasan Pengembangan Masyarakat Madani) Hendra Masdarta JI. Ronggowarsito No.48 Pekanbaru Telp: (0761) - 24346 Adi Purwoko JI. Sukoharjo No.29 Pekanbaru T elp : (0761) 24637


I I I ~~,;

I'i~".

I' ,~.:~,'-

I', I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

.'

Yayasan HAKIKI Devi Anggraeni JL. Beringin/Letjen S. Parman No. 53 C Gobah Pekanbaru RIAU - 28131 Telp/Fax: (0761) 26514

REGION SULAWESI

South East Sulawesi

YASCITA (Yayasan Cinta Alam) Silverius Oscar Unggul & Muchlis L. Usman JI. Laute III NO.65 Mandonga Kendari 93111 Telp/Fax: 0401 - 327860 Telp/Fax : 0401 - 322381

North Sulawesi

Walhi Sulawesi Utara Moudy Gerungan JI. Maranatha No. 174 Kelurahan Paslaten I Lingkungan III Tomohon 95362 Tel/Fax: (0431) 353451

Yayasan Kelola Harry JI. Santo.Joseph NO.71 Kleak Lingkungan III Manado 95115 Telp/Fax: (0431) 867445

REGION PAPUA DAN MALUKU

West Papua

YALI (Yayasan Lingkungan Hidup Irian Jaya) Abner Mansai & Denny Yomaki JI. Tobati No. 81 Asano - Abepura Jayapura - Papua Telp : (0967) - 584671


I I I ~~,;

I"> 1< ,~.:~,'-

I'·

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Yayasan HAKIKI Devi Anggraeni JL. Beringin/Letjen S. Parman No. 53 C Gobah Pekanbaru RIAU - 28131 Telp/Fax: (0761) 26514

REGION SULAWESI

South East Sulawesi

YASCITA (Yayasan Cinta Alam) Silverius Oscar Unggul & Muchlis L. Usman JI. Laute III NO.65 Mandonga Kendari 93111 Telp/Fax: 0401 - 327860 Telp/Fax : 0401 - 322381

North Sulawesi

Walhi Sulawesi Utara Moudy Gerungan JI. Maranatha No. 174 Kelurahan Paslaten I Lingkungan III Tomohon 95362 Tel/Fax: (0431) 353451

Yayasan Kelola Harry JI. Santo.Joseph NO.71 Kleak Lingkungan III Manado 95115 Telp/Fax: (0431) 867445

REGION PAPUA DAN MALUKU

West Papua

YALI (Yayasan Lingkungan Hidup Irian Jaya) Abner Mansai & Denny Yomaki JI. Tobati No. 81 Asano - Abepura Jayapura - Papua Telp : (0967) - 584671


I I~

I!~~~y~~ ~!<';-'

i~ I~i;c '-: ,'~ .

1,1>····

..

I I I I I I I I I I I

Appendix 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LEI CERTIFICATION


I I~

f~: i~ '~i;, '-:, ~ .

i I I I I I I I I I I I

Appendix 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LEI CERTIFICATION


I I I, f~ ~(; ;.:: .~

1,-I .4"; ..

• ~-.

I ?;~

I]

I I I I I I I I I I I!

.I //

EXAMPLE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LEI CERTIFICATION BY MAJOR BUYER GROUP

Purpose of B&Q's Timber Buying Policy

'To continue to build our customers' trust that all our wood and paper products come either from proven, well managed forests or recycled material, thereby continuing to grow sales and build pride for our entire supply chain'

'We will make wood from well managed forests more competitive than wood from poor or unknown forestry

B&Q Timber Buying Policy Revised August 2000

All virgin wood bought by B&Q will come from forests of known location where the supplier has given us sufficient reassurance that the forest is well managed and independently certified as such.

Certification must include the ability to trace the wood from the forest to the final processor with certified 'Chain of Custody'.

B&Q recognises that FSC currently has the best available standards and certification procedures and so will only buy products certified under the FSC scheme. B&Q strongly encourages all schemes and suppliers to work towards achieving FSC certification or mutual recognition.

The following exceptions do however apply. at present:

• Products certified by other schemes. which in our judgement are likely to achieve mutual recognition or accreditation by the FSC. Currently we find the lEI (Indonesian) scheme falls into this category. and we are in discussion with the NITC (Malaysian) scheme .

• Products certified by other schemes. which in our judgement require improvement before they are likely to achieve mutual recognition or accreditation by the FSC. but which nevertheless provide some reassurance on forestry standards. Currently we Include the Finnish Forestry Certification Scheme In this category. although we acknowledge this scheme needs some significant improvement.

• Products which are on very limited sales trial within B&Q but only when certification is achievable and there is commitment from the supplier to achieve certification within six months ofthe trial commencing.

• Products with a verifiable post·consumer recycled content exceeding 82.5% (over one years production) are exempt.

In every case equivalent FSC certified products will be stocked in favour of the above exceptions assuming that all the other purchasing requirements are satisfied.

In addition B&Q will. on a very limited basis consider buying timber from sources still under development. but only when there is an independently verifiable action plan being implemented to drive continuous improvement and ultimately certification. To qualify the sources must either be registered under the Certification Support Programme organised by SGS or be members of the Tropical Forest Trust. This exception will only be operated with the express and specific permission of the Sustalnabillty Department at B&Q. on a project by project basis.

To ensure that there is a simple message for our customers. B&Q will only use the FSC logo on its products and in its marketing. For all the listed exemptions or when the message is too complex because of a variety of sources within the same product B&Q will use a truth statement backed up. at all times. by an Independent chain of custody.

A monthly random audit will be carried out. Any product not meeting this policy will not be stocked and if found in the business; discontinued.

oCaall~cmJ


I I

I

I]

I I I I I I I I

I!

EXAMPLE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LEI CERTIFICATION BY MAJOR BUYER GROUP

Purpose of B&Q's Timber Buying Policy

'To continue to build our customers' trust that all our wood and paper products come either from proven, well managed forests or recycled material, thereby continuing to grow sales and build pride for our entire supply chain'

'We will make wood from well managed forests more competitive than wood from poor or unknown forestry

B&Q Timber Buying Policy Revised August 2000

All virgin wood bought by B&Q will come from forests of known location where the supplier has given us sufficient reassurance that the forest is well managed and independently certified as such.

Certification must include the ability to trace the wood from the forest to the final processor with certified 'Chain of Custody'.

B&Q recognises that FSC currently has the best available standards and certification procedures and so will only buy products certified under the FSC scheme. B&Q strongly encourages all schemes and suppliers to work towards achieving FSC certification or mutual recognition.

The following exceptions do however apply. at present:

• Products certified by other schemes. which in our judgement are likely to achieve mutual recognition or accreditation by the FSC. Currently we find the lEI (Indonesian) scheme falls into this category. and we are in discussion with the NITC (Malaysian) scheme.

• Products certified by other schemes. which in our judgement require improvement before they are likely to achieve mutual recognition or accreditation by the FSC. but which nevertheless provide some reassurance on forestry standards. Currently we Include the Finnish Forestry Certification Scheme In this category. although we acknowledge this scheme needs some significant improvement.

• Products which are on very limited sales trial within B&Q but only when certification is achievable and there is commitment from the supplier to achieve certification within six months ofthe trial commencing.

• Products with a verifiable post·consumer recycled content exceeding 82.5% (over one years production) are exempt.

In every case equivalent FSC certified products will be stocked in favour of the above exceptions assuming that all the other purchasing requirements are satisfied.

In addition B&Q will. on a very limited basis consider buying timber from sources still under development. but only when there is an independently verifiable action plan being implemented to drive continuous improvement and ultimately certification. To qualify the sources must either be registered under the Certification Support Programme organised by SGS or be members of the Tropical Forest Trust. This exception will only be operated with the express and specific permission of the Sustainabillty Department at B&Q. on a project by project basis.

To ensure that there is a simple message for our customers. B&Q will only use the FSC logo on its products and in its marketing. For all the listed exemptions or when the message is too complex because of a variety of sources within the same product B&Q will use a truth statement backed up. at all times. by an Independent chain of custody.

A monthly random audit will be carried out. Any product not meeting this policy will not be stocked and if found in the business; discontinued.


- - - - - _.- -

• ~ S· So IQ

tJ <D

CB .g 3 <D

~ c.... 0 ::J 0 ),. Cl)

::l Cl) <D Cl)

~ ~

0 <D ~ 0 r- CD .."

;:l. » C/) m c:: Cl) - _.

"'0 ii) ...., So Q)

_. "'0 III 0 CD 0- ::l ID Q) ::::J ~ Co ~ Ci! 0

0... f!l. -n >< ~ en ::l ::J

0 --.J III -c IQ <D .., 3 <D 0 ~

~ So 0 S" g- o

::J 0 <D

~o

- - - - - _.- -

• ~ S· So IQ

tJ <D

CB .g 3 <D

~ c.... 0 ::J 0 ),. Cl)

::l Cl) <D Cl)

~ ~

0 <D ~ 0 r- CD .."

;:l. » C/) m c:: Cl) - _.

"'0 ii) ...., So Q)

_. "'0 III 0 CD 0- ::l ID Q) ::::J ~ Co ~ Ci! 0

0... f!l. -n >< ~ en ::l ::J

0 --.J III -c IQ <D .., 3 <D 0 ~

~ So 0 S" g- o

::J 0 <D

~o

I I [ I~;\c

..

C,,',. ,

I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11

I I

Joint Certification Protocol pep} between

LEI-accredited Certification Bodies and

FSC'accredlted Certification Bodies September 2000

This protocol refers to a joint certification programme between FSC- accredited Certification Bodies (FSC-CBs} and lEI-accredited Certification Bodies (LEt-CBs) for natural forest management in Indonesia. All FSC- and LE I-accredited certification bodies currently working in Indonesia will be bound by this protocol for the period of its validity. The JCP is intended to operate for one year or until revised or renewed. Any revision ijefore one year will need agreement of all parties. This protocol is part of the Memorandum of Understanding between FSC and LEI dated 3 September, 1999.

1. LEI-CBs and the FSC-CBs agree that the process of joint certification should be open, transparent and co-operative and that aU parties will benefit from the process.

2. The JCP among LEI-CB's. and FSC-CB's will cover co-operation through out all stages of the certification process to gain experience in working together and understanding each other's systems.

3. FSC, LEI, and the accredited certification bodies agree that the JCP win meet all requirements under both FSC and LEI certification systems.

4. Under the JCP all parties agreed that criteria and indicators of LEI will be used by all certification bodies operating in Indonesia. This means that FSC·C8's will use all LEI Cal, including those exceeding the requirements of the FSC, as well as any additional FSC requirements, not included in the LEI Cal.

5. Only FMU that passes both LEI and FSC system requirements will be certified. The FMU will receive both an LEI certificate and an FSC certificate. The FMU wilt be allowed to use both LEI and FSC logos.

6. At the application stage, the FMU will be sent a document prepared jointly by the LEt-CB and FSC-CB explaining the certification process under the JCP.

7. Contractual arrangements will be determined by the FMU and the collaborating LEI CB and FSC CB on a case by case basis_

S. Under the JCP, an FSC scooping is not compulsory. Past experience indicates that typicaJly a scooping is reqUired. Prior to signing a contract between an FSC- or a LEI-CB and an FMU, a document completeness review shall be performed by the LEI-CS, and the need for an FSC scooping visit shall be determined by the FSC·CB.

9. The FSC-CBs and LEI-CBs agree to use a single team

• In the case of a jOint LEI screening and FSC scooping pmcess, • In field assessment


I I

C,,',.' ,


Joint Certification Protocol pep} between

LEI-accredited Certification Bodies and

FSC'accredlted Certification Bodies September 2000

This protocol refers to a joint certification programme between FSC- accredited Certification Bodies (FSC-CBs} and LEI-accredited Certification Bodies (LEt-CBs) for natural forest management in Indonesia. All FSC- and LE I-accredited certification bodies currently working in Indonesia will be bound by this protocol for the period of its validity. The JCP is intended to operate for one year or until revised or renewed. Any revision ijefore one year will need agreement of all parties. This protocol is part of the Memorandum of Understanding between FSC and LEI dated 3 September, 1999.

1. LEI-CBs and the FSC-CBs agree that the process of joint certification should be open, transparent and co-operative and that aU parties will benefit from the process.

2. The JCP among LEI-CB's. and FSC-C8's will cover co-operation through out all stages of the certification process to gain experience in working together and understanding each other's systems.

3. FSC, LEI, and the accredited certification bodies agree that the JCP win meet all requirements under both FSC and LEI certification systems.

4. Under the JCP all parties agreed that criteria and indicators of LEI will be used by all certification bodies operating in Indonesia. This means that FSC·C8's will use all LEI Cal, including those exceeding the requirements of the FSC, as well as any additional FSC requirements, not included in the LEI Cal.

5. Only FMU that passes both LEI and FSC system requirements will be certified. The FMU will receive both an LEI certificate and an FSC certificate. The FMU wilt be allowed to use both LEI and FSC logos.

6. At the application stage, the FMU will be sent a document prepared jointly by the LEt-CB and FSC-CB explaining the certification process under the JCP.

7. Contractual arrangements will be determined by the FMU and the collaborating LEI CB and FSC CB on a case by case basis_

S. Under the JCP, an FSC scooping is not compulsory. Past experience indicates that typicaJly a scooping is reqUired. Prior to signing a contract between an FSC- or a LEI-CB and an FMU, a document completeness review shall be performed by the LEI-CS, and the need for an FSC scooping visit shall be determined by the FSC-CB.

9. The FSC-CBs and LEI-CBs agree to use a single team

• In the case of a jOint LEI screening and FSC scooping pmcess, • In field assessment


I I I (le j:\~: ,'~ .',

I'·· , ;- ~

I I I I' I'·,·

I,

I I I I I li I!'.: l:

le;,

I! Il.}

;/

10. Public consultation is a fundamental component of the JCP. It starts with a joint public announcement a minimum of 30 days before a field assessment takes place.

11. Public summaries of certification decision will be made available in both 8ahasa Indonesia and English and will include a full description of the jOint certification process.

12. SUNeillance visit will be done according to each system's requirements. a joint sUNeiflance is preferable. Results shall be shared between both the LEI-C8 and FSC-CB. Suspension Of

termination of the certificate will follow the procedures laid out in Table 1 or table Z, point 17.

13. Appeal process will follow each system's requirements. Suspension or termination of the certificate will follow the proceaures laid out in Table 1 or Table 2. point 17.

14. LEI and FSC may send obseNers to monitor implementation of the JCP, Provided that the FMU agrees full report of each CB can be made available to LEI f FSC.

15. The details of the certification steps under the JCP are described in Table 1. and Table 2.

Table t Certification Process Under JCP When Scooping by FSC-CB is Needed.

No Action Step Responsible par5es/person 1. FMU sends application and delivers all required documents to FMU and LE! CBs and/or

LEI CBs and/or FSC CBs. C8s communicate with respective FSC CBs partner CB.

2 a. Document Completeness review by LEI CB LEI CB b. DeciSion about scooping by FSC CB FSCCB

3 Contracting between FMU and C8(s} FMU and LEI cas and/or FSC CBs

4 CBs put together wOrkplan and teams for LEI screening LEI CB and FSC CB process and FSC scooping process

5. Screening! scooping step I: document review and clarification LEt CB and FSC CB of corporate statement

6 Screening! scooping step 11: Joint Field Visit (Single team) and LEt CBlEP I and FSC CB there may be LEI-CB facilitator

7 Screeningl scooping step Ill: EP I decision (LEI CB} and separate report writing by both CBs LEt CB/EP I and FSC CB

8 a. If EP I decision: fail- back to (1) application/process LE1CB restarts, FSC CB awaits EP I approval

b. EP I decision: pass- proceed to field assessment FMU 9 Notification to proceed: the FMU contacts LEIIFSC-CB. CBs FMU - FSC/LEI CBs

communicate with respective partner CB. 10 Contracting for field assessment FMU - FSCiLEI CBs 11 CBs develop work plan and put team together based on LEI LErlFSC-CBs

and FSC system reg,uirements. A minimum of ~ assess"~


I

I

I I I

I.·····:

I I' I'···

I I I I

10. Public consultation is a fundamental component of the JCP. It starts with a joint public announcement a minimum of 30 days before a field assessment takes place.

11. Public summaries of certification decision will be made available in both 8ahasa Indonesia and English and will include a full description of the jOint certification process.

12. SUNeillance visit will be done according to each system's requirements. a joint sUNeiflance is preferable. Results shall be shared between both the LEI-C8 and FSC-CB. Suspension Of

termination of the certificate will follow the procedures laid out in Table 1 or table Z, point 17.

13. Appeal process will follow each system's requirements. Suspension or termination of the certificate will follow the proceaures laid out in Table 1 or Table 2. point 17.

14. LEI and FSC may send obseNers to monitor implementation of the JCP, Provided that the FMU agrees full report of each CB can be made available to LEI f FSC.

15. The details of the certification steps under the JCP are described in Table 1. and Table 2.

Table t Certification Process Under JCP When Scooping by FSC-CB is Needed.

No Action Step Responsible par5es/person 1. FMU sends application and delivers all required documents to FMU and LE! CBs and/or

LEI CBs and/or FSC CBs. C8s communicate with respective FSC CBs partner CB.

2 a. Document Completeness review by LEI CB LEI CB b. DeciSion about scooping by FSC CB FSCCB

3 Contracting between FMU and C8(s} FMU and LEI cas and/or FSC CBs

4 CBs put together wOrkplan and teams for LEI screening LEI CB and FSC CB process and FSC scooping process

5. Screening! scooping step I: document review and clarification LEt CB and FSC CB of corporate statement

6 Screening! scooping step 11: Joint Field Visit (Single team) and LEt CBlEP I and FSC CB there may be LEI-CB facilitator

7 Screeningl scooping step Ill: EP I decision (LEI CB} and separate report writing byboth CBs LEt CB/EP I and FSC CB

8 a. If EP I decision: fail- back to (1) application/process LE1CB restarts, FSC CB awaits EP I approval

b. EP I decision: pass- proceed to field assessment FMU 9 Notification to proceed: the FMU contacts LEIIFSC-CB. CBs FMU - FSC/LEI CBs

communicate with respective partner CB. 10 Contracting for field assessment FMU - FSCiLEI CBs 11 CBs develop work plan and put team together based on LEI LErlFSC-CBs

and FSC system reg,uirements. A minimum of ~ assess"~


I

I ,;:-~ .. ;";f . . ',~

I'·······:····'·· . . .-.,.

}-

U r

:i I''''.':

I,"

" .~::'

f I I ,

I I I I I I I I

'.'

required. 12 Joint public announcement (minimum 30 days before field LEIIFSC-CBs

assessment) in Bahasa Indonesia and English . 13 Joint Field assessment, including public consultation. The LElfFSC-CBs

FKD (regional consultation forum) needs to be involved. 14 Joint fieldwork (including briefingf de-briefing) of FMU FMU -LEI/FSC-CBs 15 Separate reporting

a. LEI CB Assessor to EP 11 LEI-CBs b. FSC CB Assessor to FSC-CB FSC-CBs

16 .. §~P~L~t~ .. g~~i~l.~!.l maki'!.lLP!oce~ .......... , .. _ .. _, .. , .. _ .. , .. , ",_ .. _ .. _,_ .. " .. " .. LEI-CBsfEPII - FSC-CB _'~_'~_"_' __ ~""'¥""N'H'~"_'_"_'_~"""'_N'_'_'_"'~"_ ..... _m~ .... _

17 Combined decision and notification to FMU: LEI-CBs & FSC-CBs • Situation I: FMU passes in LEI and FSC system. Joint

notification to FMU, • Situation 11: FMU passes in LEI system but does not

pass FSC system, LEI-CB notifies FMU that it has 6 months to meet FSC requirements.

• Situation Ill: FMU passes FSC system but does not pass LEI system. FSC-CB notifies FMU that it has 6 months to meet LEI requirements (see note below),

• Situation IV: FMU does not pass either system. LEI-CB and FSC-CB notify that it has 6 months to meet both LEI and FSC requirements (see note below).

Note: Under LEI system, an FMU that does not pass LEI system is required to re-apply for field assessment within 6 months after the decision of certification. Otherwise, FMU will be required to return to the screening process. Under FSC system, an FMU that does not pass FSC system is required to inform FSC CB when it is ready for pre-conditions or major CAR audit.

18 FMU completes administrative requirement to receive LEI-CBs & FSC-CBs certificates (Certification contract, fees)

19 a. Handing over LEI and FSC certificates and other mandatory LEI-CBs & FSC-CBs documentation. b. Public summary posted by CB's c. £...uJ?!i~_~DDg~Q~~~~D..L~~~2E .. q!~il~2.,~~,~~_9B-~y,~~..r:r:! ___ ._

__'~_~"" __ "' ___ ~'~"'~_'~_'~¥¥'_'~¥¥¥' __ .~ ____

Table 2. Certification Process Under JCP When Scooping by FSC-CB is Not Needed

No Action Step Responsible parties/person

i

1. FMU sends application and delivers all required documents to LEI FMU and LEI CBs and/or CBs and/or FSC CBs. CBs communicate with respective partner FSC CBs CB.

2 c. Document Completeness review by LEI CB LEI CB d. Decision about no need for scooping by FSC CB FSCCB

3 Contracting between FMU and CB FMU and LEI CB 4 CB put together work plan and team for LE! screening process LEI CB


I

I ,;:-,~_ 0

I ,

I I I I I I

required. 12 Joint public announcement (minimum 30 days before field LEIIFSC-CBs

assessment) in Bahasa Indonesia and English. 13 Joint Field assessment, including public consultation. The LEI/FSC-CBs

FKD (regional consultation forum) needs to be involved. 14 Joint fieldwork (including briefing/ de-briefing) of FMU FMU -LEI/FSC-CBs 15 Separate reporting

a. LEI CB Assessor to EP 11 LEI-CBs b. FSC CB Assessor to FSC-CB FSC-CBs

16 .. §~P~L~t~ .. g~~i~l.~!.l maki'!.lLP!oce~ .......... , .. _ .. _, .. , .. _ .. , .. , LEI-CBs/EPII - FSC-CB ........ ---.--.. -~.---- _·~_. __ ··_· ___ .···._ .... _._·~ .. _._ ..... __ ......... N .... _._ •• ·_.· .. ..... _m_· ... _ 17 Combined decision and notification to FMU: LEI-CBs & FSC-CBs

• Situation I: FMU passes in LEI and FSC system. Joint notification to FMU,

• Situation 11: FMU passes in LEI system but does not pass FSC system, LEI-CB notifies FMU that it has 6 months to meet FSC requirements.



Note: Under LEI system, an FMU that does not pass LEI system is required to re-apply for field assessment within 6 months after the decision of certification. Otherwise, FMU will be required to return to the screening process. Under FSC system, an FMU that does not pass FSC system is required to inform FSC CB when it is ready for pre-conditions or major CAR audit.

18 FMU completes administrative requirement to receive LEI-CBs & FSC-CBs certificates (Certification contract, fees)

19 a. Handing over LEI and FSC certificates and other mandatory LEI-CBs & FSC-CBs documentation. b. Public summary posted by CB's

_. __ .. __ .E.:£...uJ?!i~_~DDg~Q~~~~D..L~~~2E .. q!~il~2.,~~,~~.9B-~y,~~..r:r:! ___ ._ .. _ ... _ ...... __ ... ___ ....... ,_ ..... , ................. , .............

Table 2. Certification Process Under JCP When Scooping by FSC-CB is Not Needed

No Action Step Responsible parties/person

1. FMU sends application and delivers all required documents to LEI FMU and LEI CBs and/or CBs and/or FSC CBs. CBs communicate with respective partner FSC CBs CB.

2 c. Document Completeness review by LEI CB LEI CB d. Decision about no need for scooping by FSC CB FSCCB

3 Contracting between FMU and CB FMU and LEI CB 4 CB put together work plan and team for LE! screening process LEI CB


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I', : -

I I J ,

I ;

I 1

5. {Screening step I: document review and clarification of corporate I LEI CB statement

6 ScreeninQ step 11: Field Visit and there may be LEI-CB facilitator I LEI CBtEP I 7 Screening step Ill: EP I decision (LEI CB) and report writing by l

LEI-CB LEI CB/EP I

~---tc~--if EP I decision: fail~-back io (1) application/process restarts, LEI CB~ FSC CB awaits EP I approval

d. EP I decision; pass- proceed to field assessment FMU , !

~9----INOtffication-to-proceed: the-F-MU -contacts-LEi/Fsc~-CB:'C8S----"-FMlr=FsC7LEi-CBs--'--"-1 communicate with respective partner CB. \

~~ _t%§-;~Cle~~·~J~:~I~I~~~~-a~~iieamtogeiii·erbaSed-o·nTETandt~~-§t?cC~~~L.Q§~ .. ".,--.. -...... -j FSC system requirements. A minimum of 3 assessors is reguired. __ . i

:: ~~i,i;~~;;~D-=--~ (reQional consultation forum) needs to be involved. i

14 of FMU FMU - LEltFSC-CBs 15

16 17

Separate Decision makinQ process Combined decision and notification to FMU;

• Situation I: FMU passes in LEI and FSC system. Joint notification to FMU.

• Situation 11: FMU passes in LEI system but does not pass FSC system. LE I-CB notifies FMU that it has 6 months to meet FSC requirements.

• Situation Ill: FMU passes FSC system but does not pass LEI system. FSC-CB notifies FMU that it has 6 months to meet LEI requirements (see note below).


Note: Under LEI system, an FMU that does not pass LEI system is required to re-apply for field assessment within 6 months after the decision of certification. Otherwise, FMU will be required to return to the screening process. • Under FSC system, an FMU that does not pass FSC

LEI-CBs FSC-CBs LEI-CBs/EPII - FSC-CB LEI·CBs & FSC·CBs

I

system is required to inform FSC CB when it is ready for i

r-·i8'4·--'FM[TCO!;~~~~~~:~i~;r~~Z.'ifq:~e;~~tto·receive'C-e-rt1ficates- TE·I:CBS&-'FSC~C-B·s·-"-···-·I _ . .lCertiflcation contract, fees) , _ ~ 19 a, , Handing over LEI and FSC certificates and other mandatory LEI-CBs & FSC-CBs i

documentation, I b, Public summary posted by CB's 'I'

c. Public announcement accordinQ to each CB-system


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1

<,

: .

I I ! ,

I ;

I 1

5.· Screening step I: document review and clarification of corporate LEI CB < I statement I

6 Screening step 11: Field Visit and there may be LEI·CB facilitator LEI CB/EP I i 7

LEI-CS LEI CB/EP I Screening step Ill: EP I decision (LEI CB) and report writing by l

~--- c:'-if EP I decision: fail~-back io (1) application/process- restarts, LEI CB~ FSC CB awaits EP I approval

d. EP I decision: pass· proceed to field assessment FMU I '-.,.----. - .. ---.. ------.-----.. - .. - ....... - .... -.-.... -.----.-.. -<.«-< ......... «<0< _____ < ......... < .... « .. < .. 0< ___ ...... «« __ «« .. <_ .. ___ ... <_ .. _«< .. _ .... _ .... 1

9 Notification to proceed: the FMU contacts LEIIFSC-CB. CBs FMU - FSC/LEI CBs ! communicate with respective partner CB. I

~. _9.o_~<!Li3.~!in,9..fQr field_ as.s~~_~!!)~n! .. ,._,_, ___ ,., _____ .. "''''''''''''.'''_,."._____ EfI{l!L:.E~_q!~~L.Q§~",_"."",..J 11 CSs develop work plan and put team together based on LEI and LEIIFSC-CBs 1

FSC system requirements. A minimum of 3 assessors is reguired. _.' i

12 J~~~,~~:~.~~~,~~~~;~L~~~~~~~~~d.~~~b:~,:~~~~.:~~I.~,,,~=. _~~,I~~~~~~-~~-".---.-.-.""--,J 13 Joint Field assessment, including public consultation. The FKD LEIIFSC-CBs I

(regional conSUltation forum) needs to be involved, i 14 Joint fieldwork (includinq briefinql de·briefinq) of FMU FMU - LEI/FSC·CBs !

15 Separate reporting

16 17

c, LEI CB Assessor to EP 11 d, FSC CB Assessor to FSC-CB

Separate Decision making process Combined decision and notification to FMU:

• Situation I: FMU passes in LEI and FSC system, Joint notification to FMU.

• Situation 11: FMU passes in LEI system but does not pass FSC system. LE I-CB notifies FMU that it has 6 months to meet FSC requirements.


• Situation IV: FMU does not pass either system. LEI·CB and FSC-CB notify that it has 6 months to meet both LEI and FSC requirements (see note below).

Note: Under LEI system, an FMU that does not pass LEI system is required to re-apply for field assessment within 6 months after the decision of certification, Otherwise, FMU will be required

LEI·CBs FSC-CBs LEI-CBs/EPII - FSC-CB LEI·CBs & FSC·CBs

to return to the screening process, I • Under FSC system, an FMU that does not pass FSC I

system is required to inform FSC CB when it is ready for i

1"18""'" 'FM[TcO!;~~~~~~:~i~;r~~Z.,ifq:~e;~~tto'receive'C"e·rt1ficates- TE'I:CBS&·'FSC~c-B"S·'-"·--··-1 __ . .lCertification contract, fees) < _ ~ 19 a .. Handing over LEI and FSC certificates and other mandatory LEI·CBs & FSC·CBs I

documentation. I b. Public summary posted by CB's i'

c. Public announcement accordinq to each CB-system


I I

I I I I I I I 11

I, f , I

I I) I )

I ,

I :l

I ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:::~~~;i::~\. .. ~,.It/ / ~.' .,

Markus Hattemer PT. TJV International Indonesia

l{ll~~lL'M{li/ ~rifin Lambaga Mutuagung Lestari

/'-") t· ."

I r':.··/" lilj' I t·..,,,--;:· J {/ 1/ ri··/' / , h • • 1-.• ,;iN (A"'fr··'7;T't.. \~j ...... V,iA ... t.<" ) . -~J -1f-----

Richard Donovan Smart Wood

(f?k/J..A~1 . ~ r ~ ,

Timothy Synnott Forest Stewardship Council

/{~<a{(;;kv VI.£l ~}tlJ Alexander Hinrichs SFMP-GTZ

Bogor. September 20th 2000

~v Rolia Nurdiawati Sucofindo

Imam Soeseno SGS ICS Indonesia SGS Forestry

~~c=..~'.\--Dradjad Wibowo Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia

b" J.. ./ I ;-.

'({I t3.{.,/l i/ -1< d{/;'(,t':l'f~i: , ~

Barbara von Kruedener GTZ


I I I I I I I I I I 11

11

I 11

I )

I ,

Markus Hattemer PT. TJV International Indonesia

!(ll~~lL'M{li/ ~rifin Lambaga Mutuagung Lestari

Richard Donovan Smart Wood

Timothy Synnott Forest Stewardship Council

Alexander Hinrichs SFMP-GTZ

Bogor. September 20th 2000

Rolia Nurdiawati Sucofindo

Imam Soeseno SGS ICS Indonesia SGS Forestry

Dradjad Wibowo Lembaga Ekolabellndonesia

Barbara von Kruedener GTZ


I ' I EXECUTING AGENCY: I 95/pd 1-95-1 rev 4 (M) e.… · I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I)...

Documents

Transcript of I ' I EXECUTING AGENCY: I 95/pd 1-95-1 rev 4 (M) e.… · I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I)...