I' ANNEXA - waverley.gov.uk Arrick_Appendices.pdf · Assessment of Mole Valley District Council's...

Assessment of Mole Valley District Council's Five and Ten Year Housing land Supply

I'

ANNEXA

Additional Tables ~'

. '

"" " ~

.'

.1 " -I .,

"'I

.,.... .. III .J

j

j

j

j

~

Roger Tym & Partners ~ February 2009 18

~

Assessment of Mole Valley District Council's Five and Ten Year Housing Land Supply

Table6A

Identified Large Sites with Planning Permission ..-.. f1i.-.._l' TalIlNel~~WD~.~~WD~' "--'l "' ..... }'IIfI ""-d............ ... .............. 111·...- (2!l!!! - 2013) )W!!2O!3-20111

The Grange, S1, Andrews School, Grange 200&3" """ '"'Ro9d, Ashle9d (Outline) 0 No" " laundry Way, Capel 200411219 0 No" " Land at Thertield, School, Dilston, Road,

Leatherhead (+ C~ve Road) 20061493 88 0 88 No New Lodge(Stanway) School, Calvert Road,

Dorking 200711817 10 0 10 No Seeabllity, Re~ate, Ro9d, Leatherhead 2007/916 0 No" " The Nook. Horsham Road, Dorking 200411819 23 0 23 ,. ,. y~

61-fJ7 Leatherhe9d, Road, Ashte9d 200611606 0 y~

Cleveland Lodge (Royal School of Church

Music), Weslhumb~, Street, Westhumble 2006/1607 0 y~ " "

~e Valley HouSIng Monttoring Report, December 2008 Mole Valley Five Year Housing Land Supply at 1" April 2008-Table 6B

Identified Large Sites with Planning Permission - Outstanding sites

- P!!nr!!p SlllullIli6IR1i..-.. The Grange, S1, Andrews School, Grange Road, Ashtead -

I..

laundry Way, Capel Oulline applic8tlon lor the oonsidetalion of stting and mllflns of - a.ceess /0( the oonstrUClKln of lour 3 bed hOOS8S, ten 2 bed " TlOIJses, two 1 bed flats and one B 1(light industrial) untt with

, associated paoong. DemOittion or industrial untts MMOOllIl628 Demolttion of ex!SMg buildings and erection of 18 No. (MellingsI. and 1 No. 81 untt. Provision 0126 No. parking spaces lor ~llngs and 4 No. parking Spa005 for B1 untt with assodated access and landscaping. Under consideration Applic:etiM indudlts EIA

r-land ilt The<f>eld. School, Dilston, 88 Roed, Lealhemead {. Cleeve Road}

New Looge(S1anway) SChool, Change ofuseto resider1tial and conversion to 10 No. flats (7 ~ 2 Carve" Ro9d. O<Jrking bed flats and 3 x 3 bed fIals) with associated access, parking and

I cycle storage. Partial demolttion of annexe and central hall area and erection of two storey extensions. I.

Seeeb,lity. Reigate, Road, Erection of 24 No. (Mellings (comprising 18 No. townhouses and 1 Leatherhead No. block of 6 apartments) following demolition of Reeves Coort.

Erection of 3 No. new care homes for blind and partially-sighted

i residents. RefUrbishment and redevelopment of existing care home faciltties. ...

Souroa: Mole Valley online planning records

.. l.

Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 ..

I

19

--


Table6C

Identified Large Sites with Planning Permission - Assessment of

Outstanding Sites

""'~ MV7 The Grange, St, Andrews

School, Grange Road, Ashlead

MV8 Laundry Way, Capel

MV9 Land at Thertleld, School, DIlSlon, Road, Leatherhead {+ Cleeve Road)

MV10 New Loc:lge(Stanway) School, Calvert Road, Dorking

Seeability, Relgate, Road, Leathert1elld

Stte appears relatively unconstrained, though there are a number 01 mature trees on the stte.

Stte appears to be relatively unconstralrJed, though as tt Is occupied by e~lstlng industrial units there may be potential contamination issues.

Sile appears to be relatively unconstrained, though as tt Is occupied by existing buildings there is potential lor contamination. Electricity pylons cross stte.

Sile appears to be relatively unconstrained, though as iI is occupied by existing buildings there Is potential lor contamination.

Site appears to be relatively unconstrained, however the stte contains a nurrber of mature trees.

Outline permission has been granted, however Reserve Matters was refused. Retusal was due to Increased amount of development proposed on s~e and the potential impact on charader, traffic and parking. h is understood that the site has been bought by Barren Homes and Is therefore available for llevelopmem. The sile Is likely to be developable, however delivery may be delayed due to ma.....et condttions. The Increase In the amount of development proposed at Reserve Matters stage reflects a desire to Increase viability.

I '

-' The stte oong mar1wted. The planning permission dates from July 2007 and as h has not yet been implemented tt raises questions about the viabllily 01 the scheme In the current market condttions. Vacant schooL Stte under oller at May 2008. Planning permission granted January 2008. The sites viabllhy may be affected In the current mar1wt condhions, though as demolition not proposed the delivery olthe stte by 2013 may be reasonable. Stte appears to be deliverable, though current markel condilions may cause delay.

j

RogerTym & Partners February 2009 20

I


Table6D

Identified Large Sites with Planning Permission - Rating of

Outstanding Sites

~ SIi8..sna ........... PPS3~0*rI • iLl; ' .. 10_ '"- ......' ............',"'" """ ..-, 'w_ AcNe<llbllly --- "' 2013-2018 "" , 4 ""The Grange, 4 --- --0""" 51. Andrews " " " """",.

Grange Rood.

MY, ""',,'Laundry Way. 16 4 3 3 16 0 16 Capel Land at 4 3 3 0 Therfield."'" " " " """"'.Dilston. Road. Leathert1ead {"Cleave Road),,, 10 4 4 4 10 10 0

0 Lod(le(S1anw ay) School. Catver1 Road. DOI1,jog

MY1 S98llb,lity. 4 4 4 0 1 Ralgata. " " "

""

Road.'Leatl'erttead

5 = No constra,ms 1 =Very CQnSlrair.ed

Source RTP assessed rating 0\ deliverablll1)r and \'mascala JOJ delivery. In assessing whlllhllll 5iI9S will be deliverable in rhe first 5 years. we hBVe uSl!'d lhe estimated lima frame In the Ann~'al Monitoring Repon as a staninll point.

[

c c c c ,..

Roger Tym & Partners... February 2009 21

Assessment of Mole VaHey District Council's Five and Ten Year Housing land Supply

I '

Table7A

Identified Medium Sites with Planning Pennission

~ In tlntflve ~ b-.lln -.clfm..- ....... == r Elipoded by IN "' ..... I!Iopected by MV '" """'. ... Q1I•••..,ad8l

101 M!2!!D!-2013! en12013-20111 !!M 20DI Cecilia House, The GrallQe centre, RectOI)' 200211788 6 0 6 No Lane, Bookham Surrey Ambulance Station, Kingston Road, 200611212 0 No Laalharheacl " "

~,

Klbblewhne House, Harrcmlaocls, Dorkll19 200611450 10 0 10 No Former Wioclmill PH, Flint Hill, Horsham Rd, 200512041 0 y~

Dorki!!!! " " 101 -117 High Street, Dorking 200411273 0 y~ • Stubs Close, North Holmwood 200611321 Q 2Q y~

Mole Valley Housing Mannering Repon, December 2008 " Mole Valley Five Year Housing Land Supply a11" April 2008

" " ..,

Table 7B c ,

...Identified Medium Sites with Planning Pennission - Outstanding sites ,

P!!r!n!ng SUIluI8l11011l19... cecilia House, The Grange Centre, Erection of a terrace of 5 x 1 bedroom bungalows. Exlenslon and roo! 6 -"""'"Rectory Lane, Bookham ahera~ons to Cecelia House to provide 4 x1 bedroom na~. 2 bedshs ...,

and 1 x 5 bedroom care home. {All units to be OC(:l)p~ by residents/staff of the Grange centre.

Surrey Ambulance Station, Kingston -' Road, Leatherhead " Kibblewhne House. Harrow1ands, Dorking ~

,

..., Source' Mole Valley online planning records

Table 7C

Identified Medium Sites with Planning Pennission - Assessment of jOutstanding Sites

Cecilia House. The Site appears relatively unconstrained except 11>9 anginal appllcation forthe site was Grange Centre, Rectory for presence of mature spec~ on site. approved in March 2003. The application was Lane, Bookham for'1 unnsofwhid15wereconstrucled. Given

the timescale and the current market condnions, his questiotl!lble whether the remaining 6 snes will come forward.

MVn Surrey Ambulance Station, Kingston Road, Leatherhead

MV" KibblewMe House, Harrowlands. Dorking

sne appears relatively unconstrained th<Jll'ilh corner slle may present access constraints Existing access established by ambulance SIaIion. Poterltial contamination due to pnMous use. TPOSOn sne

The original applicalion dates from 2006, Mole Valley indicate no reason for site not being Implemented. Current market condnlons may cause delay.

Development of the she has been delayed by the refusal of Reserve Matters In April 2008. No further applicalion has since been submitted. Given the timescale for planning, the need to demolish an existing building and the current market condhions. h is questionable whether this site would be delivered within t1>9 five year periodto2013.

Site $PE!ClflC conSlrlnats havt! been Identified uslng the Local Plan and MVs online planning application records.

Roger Tym & Paf1ners February 2009 22

Assessment of Mole Valley District Councirs Five and Ten Year Housing Land Supply

Table 70

Identified Medium Sites with Planning Permission - Rating of

Outstanding Sites

......., ....""" """-"""

" ......., - 6liiVrilliY III 10i);pn.l

.2Otl """ pnMoianil......--MV1 2

Cedlia House, The Grclnge • , , 3 6 ""6

Centre, Rectory

MV1 Lane, Bookham Surrey "

, , , " "3 Ambulance

Station, Kingston Road, Leatherhead

_"'"..-,

2013-201'...0

0

, ,MV1 Kibblewh~e 3 10 10 o 4 House,

Harrowlands, Dorklnp

5 = No constraints 1 = Very constrained

Source RTP assessed rating of deliverabllity and timescale for lleIivefy. In assessing whether slteswlll be deliverable In the first 5 years. we have used the estimated time frame In the Annual MonliOling Report as a starling point.

I • ,

'

I~

... ,I..

I""

L

C C ,.. l..

C ,..

Roger Tym & Partners... February 2009

r 23


, '

Table8A

Identified Smaller Sites with Planning Permission

........ ...,..PGI'iIiOG " " , , ,........

\!M Rayleigh House, 32 High Street, Bookham 2007/259& o

MOl2OO7/12 09.B2

Lavender Cottage to St Lucia, Lealherhead 20071501 & 6 0 6 No Road, Bookham 200711489 10 -14 High St, Leatherhead 1m'" , 0 , No Above 32 - 42 The Crescent Leatherhead 200211688 4 0 4 No 4 Bridge St, Lealherhead 6 0 6 No, ,37 - 39 Kingston Rd, Leatherhead , 0 , No Hascombe House, 63·73, The Street, 0 No

""""" rio The Brewery Inn, The Street, Ashtead 2006/1371 6 0 6 No The Pound, Wescott Street, Wscott 200712050 , 0 , No Furze Hollow, Garth mews, TO\Wr Hill Road, 200411966 , 0 , No Dorklng Tuns Garage, London Road, Dolking 20041125 9 0 9 No 250 - 256 High Street, Oorking 2O<W9&& 0 No,• ,• ..rIo 80 - 82 South Street Dol'king 2007/1472 0 No rio 94-102 South Street, OOlking 2007/449 , 0 , No Srockham Court Farm, Brckham , 0 , No .1"""'396Stan Hill Court HoIel, Chariwood 200611678 6 0 6 No 42 leslie road, dorking 200711289 6 0 6 ? 17-25 Groveside, Bookham 6 0 6 Yo,"""'396Lyngarth _Willow, Warren, Leatherhead Rd, 200611461 1 0 1 yO' Bookham rio 88 - 90 Links Rd, Ashtead 200611549 1 0 1 yO' rio 56-58 Links Rd, Ashtead , 0 , yO'

2007/609"""'''. Ashtead lodge, 8 palkers land, Ashtead 200611155 , 0 , yO' Pledges Yard, FalklandRoad, Dorking 200311607 6 0 & yO' j 19West St & Junction Road, OOlking 100611593 , 0 , yO' Farnbank, Horsham Road, Forest Green 2004J15OO , 0 , yO'

Mole Valley Housing Mon~Ol1ng Report, December 2008 Mole Valley Five Year Housing Land Supply at 1" Aprll2OO8 j

j

j

Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 24

'

c [

c c c c


Table 8B

Identified Smaller Sites with Planning Permission Outstanding sites

..-Rayleigh House, 32 High Street, 20071259& -.....,

5 Bookham MOI2OO7/12

59& 62

l.lM!neer Cottage to St Lucia, 2007/501 & , Lealhemead Road, 600kham 200711489

10 - 14 High 51, Leath6rh~d ".5" 1

Above 32 - 42 Th6 Cr6scent Leatherhead 200'''''' E~oo 01 3 storey rear extension ane conversion of

e~isling offices and retail units 10 provide 5 no. 1 ,

bedroom flats with 2 office units 00 ground floor.

4 Bridge St, Leatherhead 2006113JJ (Re'oisjon 10 thai refused under MOI01/17S0). Change of Use of upper floors from offices 10 four Mats , (2 bed units) toge/her with mansard roof extension 10

37·39 Kingslon Rd, Llllllh6rhead ,,,,,,,"" create a lur1hertwo 1 bed units, (lOIal 016 flats). Car p!u'l'iO!! area to rear for 7 cars.

5

H!lsoombe h'ouse. 63·73. The Strlllll, Asht&1ld rio The Brewery Inn, The Strlllll, _oJ

200'"'' 200611371

7

, The Pound, Wescotl Street, W_"" 2007/2050 Erad 7 No. ltNeIlings with associated parking and

access. Decision Fel108 5

Furze HolloW, Garth mews, Tower 200411966 Demolilion of e?!isting bungaloW and detached garage 5 Hill Road, Dorklng and the ereclion of a building comprising si~ flats and

eight car parking spaces. Approved 07..,Jan-200;i lutts Garag6, London Road, 200411125 Demolnlon 01 eXisting garage sheds and ereelion of 9 Dorking nioo residential un~s (two 4 bed, lour 3 bed and three 3

bed). SUbsequen1applil:llllon MOI2oo711533 Ereelioo of9 no. dwellings: comprising 6" three bedroom and 3 x two bedrooms. (MOllifications 10 planning PIIrmissoon MOI200411125). Cunantly under COfIsidllra~Ofl.

COmment on file"leII: in Mnos of heacl of planning 10 perm~ IoliowinQ s106 llQreemenl ",nd resor~rlon 01 EnYironment AllIIn!:)' objaaions"

250 - 256 High Street, Dorking 8

rio 80 . 82 SouIh Strlllll Dorklng 2007/1472 5

rio 94-102 South Strllel. Dorking 2007/449 E~on of5 No. dwellinas with ass0d8tell PlIrklna: 5 amended llOOll&& off V1ncllnt Road: lind change of use oflandto the rear 0196 South Street 10 a pia," tiire yard, /Resubmlsslon of MD/2OO!iIll63lll.

Brockham coun Farm, Brod<ham 200511395 ResiOOnlial conversion of farm buildings comprising 5 5 dwellings. and conslructlon of car·port following demolilion of structure. Appeal against condilions

Stan Hill Court HOIel, Char1woOll determined July 2008 ,

42 Lesl~ road, Dorklng 200711289 Outline appl(:ation for the consideration of layout, , scale, exIemal appearance and means 01 access for the conslruction of a two storey building wilh accommodation in the roof space comprising of 7 No. ~ats with associated parking. Demol~ion 01 existing bUngalow. Determined on Apreal

SOUrce: Mole Valley online plannlrIQ le<::ofds

c RogerTym & Partners February 2009 25

r


Table Be

Identified Smaller Sites with Planning Permission - Assessment of

Outstanding Sites

RIP...... "' RIP_

MV15 Rayleigh House, 32 High Sttewtthln built up area. Wnhln Repealed planning applications Indicate con~nued

Slreet, Bookham Bookham ConselVatlon Area. No off Interest in completing development, though may road parking, however highly highligl1l concerns with viabillly. Likely that sustainable location. developmerrt will come !oIward.

MV16 Lavender Cottage 10 St Site within built up area. Site contains Work was undertaken to discharge conditions In early Luda, Leatllerhead a substantial number of mature trees. 2008, however a subsequent application was submilled Road. Bookt1am Oll!side, bul adjoining AONB and In July 2008 and refused In September 2008. This

Greenbelt. The site is occupied by revised appiication sought to increase the yield from three subslantlal dWellings. the sne and poIenttally highlights concerns with

viabillly. In current market It is not certain thai development will COIT1ll forward due to cost of buildings on site.

MV17 10 - 14 High St, She appears relatively unconstrained AWlication has already commenced, part counted as Laatherhead complalions. Likely thai site will be complllted

MV11l AI;love 32 - 42 The sne appears relatively unconstrained Original application aWroved 5 dwellings, one has Cresc:ertl Lealherhead been comp~ed. The ~mescale since the original

application is lengthy and the certainty that others will be delivered Is therefore reduced, particularly In the current climale

MV19 4 Bridge St, Lealherhead Stte appears relatively unconstrained Application expired November 2008. Application was submnled corocurrently with a second appllcallon to extend the building and accommodate two further flats - th~ second application was rerused. This site Is ."'" 37 - 39 Kingston Rd.

Leatherhead S~e appaars relatively unconstrained

therefore considered to be undeliverable. This application fllpresenls a fllnElWal of a previously unimplemented scheme that was awroved In 2002. The Swan Bed and Bfllakfast continues to be marketed as a guest house. As the sita did not come forward in lhe buoyam housing pel"lod despita having pel"mlsslon, n is not certain lhat it will come forward now. There is no record on file of any work undertaken to discharge ."" Hascombe House, 63

73, The Street, Ashtead Site appaars relatively unconstrained

conditions. Application sd1llduled to explfll on 30th March 2009. No evidence on file of any work undertaken to discharge corldnions. Uncertain that development will be delivered

rio The Brewery Inn, The S~e appears relatively unconstrained. Site dearance commenced April 2008. Likely sne will Street, Astttead Previous use as car parking. the!efore be delivered within five year period. condhions

potential contamination. Boundary discharged in April 2008.

• ,m The Pound. Wescott ,~. Mature tress on site. No Informalion of file regarding discharge or conditiOns.

Street, Wescott No clear reasons wily sne should not be developed. Stte appears relatively unco<lstraine<l

Tubs Garage, London sne in Flood Zone. A public sewer Revised application not approved Iodate. Query Road, Dorking crosses the site. The sne has a regarding S106 agreement and objecUons Irom EA.

sloping topography. Potential Sne understood to be cleared therefore likely that contamination on sne. development will progress within fwe year period to . 2013.

~. 250 • 256 High Street, sne appears relatively unconstrained Application scheduled to expire on August 2009. No Oorklng evidence on file of any work undertaken 10 discharge

condttlons. MY Indicate lhat fllfurbishmerrt ofofllces has taken place. Uncertain lhat development will be delivered

.~, rio 80 - 82 Soulh Streal Sne appeafs relatively unconstrained Work undertaken on mlnof amendments during 2008. Dorking No clear reason wily sne cannot be delivered by 2013 rIo 94·1 02 South Street, Stte eppears relatively unconstrained Dorking Brockham Court Farm. Potential corrtaminatlon from old Delay to i~lementation likely to be as a result of Brockham landfill, Flood Zone 3. Listed building appeal over conditlons. sne likely 10 come!olward by

on stte. 2013 as bern conversions offer an attractive form of development that may not be as affected by current market condnlons.

Stan Hill Court Hotel, Greenbelt. No inrormation of file regarding discharge or conditions. ."" "'. No clear reasons why stte cannot be delivered by 2013. 42 Leslie road, Dorking sne appears relalively unconstrained No informalion offile regarding dIscharge of condilions.

No clear reasons wily stte cannot be delivered by 2013,

Site specific c:onstrlnals have been idenlified using the Local Plan and MV's online planning application records.

~,

,

,",

, ,

...

j

,'"'

-..,

..!

j


• •

• •


Table 8D

Identified Smaller Sites with Planning Permission - Rating of

Outstanding Sites

-..,~ PPS3 ~CrilorIII .... .... ...."'" ..- Y"'10~... .. .- _ .- "'" .....~ -- _........ -,

·2011

• '- - • .n>•

2013-2011... , ,MV15 Rayleigh House, 32 0 High Street, Bookham

MV16 L..aven(ler Cottage to St 6 , , • • 0 lucia, leatherhead Road, Bookham ,MV17 10 - 14 High St. 7 , , 7 7 0 leatherhead , ,MV18 Above 32 - 42 The 4 4 7 7 0 Crescent leatherhead

MV19 4 Bridge St, 6 , 0 0 0 leatherhead , , , , ,'Vlb J7 - 39 Kingston Rd, 0•leatherhead , , ,,~, Hascombe House, 63- 7 7 7 0

73. The Street,

, , , 0,= """""rio The Brewery Inn. 6 • • ,= The Street, Ashtead

,- , , , , , 0The Pound. Wescott •Street, Wescott , , , , ,,~,,- Furze Hollow, Garth 0•mews. T<1Ner Hill Road.Oorklng

MV25 TI.I!IS Garage, london 9 , , , • 0 0 Road.Oorklng , , , ,,~. 250 - 256 High Streel. • 0 0

Dor1<l"ll , , , ,'~7 rio 80 - 82 South

Street Dorklng , , , , , 0,~, rio 94-102 SOUth Street, Oor1<lng,= , , , , ,8rockham Court Farm. •BrockhBm , ,

0

Sian HIli Court Hotel. 6 0 r "'" • • ,Charlwood

,~, 42 lesl'" road. Oo~ng 6.. 5" No conSlrain1S 1 "Very conSlJained

c Source RTP 855essed rallng 01 deliverabllily and llmescale lor dellvlIry. In a55e!lSlng whether sitllS \If'11 be dllliYlIrabie In the r.JSl 5 years. we hltve used lheestimated lime frame in the Annual Monitoring Re()On as 8 Slsnlng ~m.

c c c c c c Roger Tym & Partners

February 2009 27

r


I

4 0HS014

..... 285 - 293 High Street, SulTey Ha~ey

........

Table 10A

New Planning Permissions identified in SHLAA

Davidson Garage, Dorklng Malthouse PH, rIo St Martin's Walk, Dorking HS020 o 37 No

~,

Mole Hili, Reigille Road, Dorking HS022 3 o 3 No Mala Valley Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment, November 2008

Table 10B "",

New Planning Permissions identified in SHLAA - Planning Status at

01/01/09

PlIn'*'U Staluslt 1101.0U9 ......- .1285 - 293 High Street, Surrey HS014 M0J2oo7/1562 A mixed usa commarc~1 and residential development Including two A1 Harley Davidson Garage, (retail) units and one A3 (reSlaur:ant) unil on grourKl floor and first floor levels and 4 no. Dorking resldentaal dwellings on second floor. (Allernillive scheme to thill submitted urKler

M0/2007/1514). Approved Mallhouse PH, rio St Martin'S H'roo jWalk, Dorking

Mole Hill, Reigale Road, H'022 M0J2oo7/2065 Erection of 4 No. dwellings following demoillion of existing. Formation Dorking of new access from Reigale Road and closure of existing access. (see also

M0/2007120641. Apllfovad 27 May 2008 jSource: Mole Valley online planning records

Table 10C j New Planning Permissions identified in SHLAA - Assessment

RlP MV SIte SIte Iddrels Site Specific Constralnll RTP Reasoning

"of "" MV32 HS014 285 - 293 High Street, Relatively unconstrained. Planning approved May 2008,

Surrey Ha~ey although Market may delay delivery, Davidson Garage, likely that lour sites will come forward jDorking by2013

jMV34 HS022 Mole Hili, Relgale Planning permission for redevelopment Planning approved May 2008, Road, Dorking granted May 2008 although Market may delay delivery,

likely that four slles will come forward by 2013

Srte spe<:mc constrinills have been identified using the SHLAA, Local Plan and MV's online planning application records.


- -


Table 100

New Planning Pennissions identified in SHLAA - Rating Sites

PPS3 o.a-.bIltyQ*-iol..."'" ..- ,.,y... n1~~ -- -.... --. --. ......,,- AVlIWiIty "'''' 2013-201' - --- ---.." ,..

285 - 293 High Street, 4 4 4 4 4 4 0""" Surrey Harley Oavidsoo Garage, Dorklng Ma~house PH, rio St 4 4 4 0"'"'' Marlin's Walk, Do~ing " " " Mole Hili, Reigate Road, 3 4 4 4 3 3 0"". Dorl<.i!lf!

Soufce RTP assessed rating of deliverability and timescale for delivery. In assessing whether sites will be deliverable in the first 5 years, we have used the estimated time frame In the SHlAA as a starting pDlnt.

Table llA

Sites in Built Up Area identified in SHLAA

S~e 1Idd1es8 ,..... ElcpectedbyMVto ExpectedbyMVto T'" WIle forward ., 111111 NM COII.. lIllC8d al

flw years (2008 • GaIn AprlI2008-_. """""""'"

i ........ 2013) (2013-20181 !M'v), ,Links Road (SOiJIh Res~ntJaI Side), HSOO2 No AshIead - Stte A Murrey's Coorl, AstneiKl 0 NO"'004-- Parson's Mead SChoOl, Asmead HSOO5 90 90 No Remploy, Ermvn WIri, Ashtead "'006 12 12 No Crossways and Corner Cottage, 8 8 No"S<,,, Leathertlead Road, Bookham Middlymead Rood, Bookham HS010 60 60 No riO Danby Croft and lillie Shepherds, HSOll 4 4 NoL.. Leetherheed Road, Bookham Adu~ Education Centre, Dene Street, HS015 No Dorl<.iog Chalcraft Nurseries, relgate Road, Dornlng HS016 60 60 No Dor1<.ing Library Depot, GUildford Road, HS018 No

'- Dor1<.ing

,- " " " "

r-Knole Croft, Woodlands and Mernvale, HS019 , No LO"1gfleid Road, Oorking Vincent Walk Industrial Area, South Street HS024 .. .. No Dorl<.iog

L. 96 Lower Road, Fetcham "60" 8 , 8 No Rentwood, SChoo Lane Felcham HS029 , No Lealherhead Hosllttal, Poplar roed. Leather HSOJ7 No t-Ie<Id (I"'nd at) " " l.elIlherhead Sonlng Office, Station Road. No[ "'038Lealherhead " " Lealherhead Station (land all, Randalls HS039 60 60 No Rood, Leatherhead , ,Land at Mole Hill, Relgale Road, Dorking No"SQ4'4 & 6 Relgate Road, Leatherhead HS047 4 No 85 Lowur Road, Felctlam HS048 4 4 NoC •

•Utile Meads, EastWlck Road, Bookham HS049 4 No Fomer Petrol Stta. Thy Street, Ashtead 9 9 No"'050Sydney S,mmons HOlT1lls. Ovoe Rood, No"sa;, , , Ashtead 1 Lower ROlI(\ & 34 Cobham Road, Fl!Itham HSD52 4 4 NoC 123·127 KlnsgS1()1'l Road. Leatherheltd , , No"""3 Former COunty Ub'",1)' HQ, West Streel, 30 30 No"S<,.Dorking Pumping Stlll>al, River Lllne, Flltdlym HSD59 8 8 No Magistrates Coons, LOI'lClon ROad. DoJ1<.i"ll 10 No"S060C " Pippbrook, Rllipatll Road, DoJ1<.i!lf! No""''' '''' '''' Mole Valley Str"'teg~ Housing Land AOlillabWly Assv:>srnllnt, Noverroer 2008 ,..

l..

C Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 29

r


Table11B

Sites in Built Up Area identified in SHLAA - Planning Status at

01101/09

...-.. ........... Links Road (Sooth Residential Side). Ashtll<ld - StteA Murrey's Court. Ashtll<ld

Parson's Mead School. Ashtead Remploy. Ermyn Way, Ashtead

HSOO2

HSOO4 HS""

HSOO<; HSOO9

MOI200710962, Land lothe rear of 51.53.55.57 & 59. Links Road. Ashtead, Surrey. KT21 2HL, Erection of 10 dwellings, In the form of five pairs of sems, with associated landscaping, access. parking and garaging REFUSED (AND DISMISSED ON APPEAL} No further applications Site allocated in Local Plan as ba!;illine she MOI2OO8I1222: Erection of 93 No. dwellings whh associated access, parking and landscaping. Provision 01 communhy open space. (Altemative scheme to fhal submitted under MOI2008f0951). Registered 27-AuQ-2008. under consideration No relevant planning history round

~,

"" Crossways and Corner Cottage, Leatherhead Road, Bookham Mlddlemead Road, Bookham HS010 rio Danby Croft and Little HS011 Shepherds, Leatherhead Road.

"""'"mMull Education Centre, Dene HS015 Street, Dol1<lng Ctlalcraft Nurseries. raigate HS016 Road, Dorking Dol1<lng Library Depol, HS018 GUildford Road, Dorking

HS019 Knole Croft, Woodlands and MerMvale, Longfield Road. Dol1<ing Vincent Walk Industrial Arll<l, HS024 South Street Dorking

Hsa" 96 Lower Road, Feteham Rentwood. SChool Lane, HS029'_mLeatherhead Hospttal, Poplar HS037 road, Leather Head (land at) Lealherheed Sorting OffIce. HS038 Station Road, Leatherhead Leathert1ead Station (land al). HS039 Randalls Road. Leatherhead

HS046 Land at Mole Hill, Reigate Road. Dorking

HS047

4 & 6 Relgate Road, Leatherhead

HS048 85 Lower Road, Feteham

HSO<9 Little Meads, Eastwick Road, Bookham Fomer Petrol Stte, The Street, HS050

-'"Sydney Simmons Homes, HS051 Dene Road. AshIead 1 Lower Road & 34 Cobhem HS052 Road. Feteham 123 -127 Kinsgston Road, HS053 Leatherhead Former County Library HQ. HS054 West Slreet, Dorking Pumping Station, River Lane, HS059 Feteham Magistrates Courts, London HSOOO Road,Dol1<ing Pippbrook, Reigate Road, HS061 Dofki!lf!

Source: Mole Valley online planning records

No relevant planning history round

No relevant planning history found

NO relevant planning history found

M01200611941 Erection of 13 No. two and a ha~ storey dwellings in Ihe foon of five pairs of seml-detached houses and a lerrace offhree, wtth associated access, parking and car bams. (Following demolttion ofexlsling three dwellings). REFUSED (AND DISMiSSED ON APPEAL) No relevant planning history

MOI200810192 OuUine application for the consideration of siting and means of access for 8 No. detached dwellings following Ihe demolition of 96. Lower Road. Refused March 2008

No relevant planning history


No relil\lant planning history

MO/2OQ712064 Erection 01"7 no. dwellings following demolttion or eXisting. Formation 01 new access to Leslie Road and new access 10 Reigate Road for emergency vehides. REFUSED (BUT ALLOWED ON APPEAL) MOI2OO810222 OkJIline application for laYOkJI, scale, ao::ess and appearance, for Ihe erection of 8 No. dwellings comprising a terrace of 6 No. 2.5 storey dwellings and 1 No. pair orsem~dll1ached IWO storey ltNellings, whh associated parldng. All following demolttion of existing two dwellings. REFUSED (BUT ALLOWED ON APPEAL) MOI2OO8I0221 Demolttion or 85 Lower Road and erection of 6 No. detached dwellings whh associated access. REFUSED (AND DISMISSED ON APPEAL) MOI2007/0633 OkJIline application for the erection or 5 no. dwellings, comprising one pair of seml-detached Ihree bedroom dwellings and one terrace of three, Ihree bedroom dwellings, following demolttion of "Lillie Meads". DeciSion: REFUSED (AND DISMISSED ON APPEAL No relevam planning histOlY

MOJ2OO8I0152 Erection of 14 No. dwellings (comprising 6 No. houses and 8 No. b"lI111alows) following demolnion 01 exisling. Refused April 2008 No relevant planning history

MO/2(X)8I0128 Demolition of el<isting dwellings and erection of 12 No. flats wifh associated parking and landscaping. Withdrawn April 2008 No relevant planning history

No relevant planning hlslory

No releVant planning history




Table 11C

Sites identified in SHLAA - Assessment of Outstanding Sites

SilII Sildk e.a--o"'" "'.... .. ""'........ MV35 HSW links Road {South

ResKlential Side}, Ashtead - SUe A

MV36 H",O' Murrey's Coun, ""'~d

MV37 HSOO5 Parson's Mead School, ""'~d

'.. MV36 HSOO6 Remploy, Ermyn Way, Ashtead

"5009 Crossways and Corner COttage, Leatherhead - Road, Bookham

-MV<O HS010 W::fdlemead ROlId,

Bool<I'1am--

MV" HSQll "0 DanDy Croll and t.i1lIe Shepherds, -Leatherhead Road,- '''''m .. HS01S Adult Education Gentre, Dene Street, Dorlling

MV"

..roo

[ MV<l Chalcrall Nursenes, HSO" reigate Road, Dorking

C C Roger Tym & Partners

February 2009

~

In bul~ up araa, lustalnlble, potential traffic problems,

SUe sUuated wUhln built up area, Is therefore relatively sustainable except for retaill employment facilities, listed Bam & TPO reduce developable area. Understood that owner reluctant to sell. Allocated in Local Plan Built up area, sustainable, distant from train, In community use In local plan but vacant.

Built up arua, sustainable dOstant from train, loss of tlmployrnent site, TPOs on site, contamination

Built up area, sustainlble e.reep! fortraln listlld building, devttlop.er Interest

Built up area, sustainable, mixed use, rontains defective houllng stock,

Built up area, sustainable, TPO, 800 metres SAC, dl:lVtlloper interest,

Built up lrea, sustainable, in community use, in conservation area.

Greenbelt on edge of Dorking, sustainable, Area of Great Landscape Value, slight slope, developer interest

S~ ~ In a sustainable location, however acOO$S to the site appears relatively cons\ralntld and could signllicantly affect the residential amenity ofneighbounng properties, Aenal photography Indicates a number of mature traas on the site, which could limit the developable area. The southem boundary of the site adjoins thtl railway Iintl arv.l nol51:1 mitigation may therefolll need to be provided. This delivery of this site within the first fillll Veilrs ~ therefore not certain. The absence of a planning hlstOlY coupled with the owne~s reluctance to sell, signif.,;antly ,educe Ihe deliverability ci this site in the short and madlumterm.

Site Os In a sustainable location and appears to be relalio,vly unronstJ<linlld. Current application 10' 93 dWtlllinys has received numerous objections 90 dwl1llings;s Ilkl1ly to be a IWosonabitl numbtl' fo' Ihl1 $ite, Thtl probability of the site coming forward is relatively h;gh dutl to lhB committml1nlll1 plannlog stage and Ihe relatively fal;\ lum around from Ippeillo ruvised applicltion Site is in a $llstalnable location and appears 10 be rllIati......y unronstrained. The Bite Is occupied by a large numbe' of lMisling bUlldlrJgs and It Ie undl1l'SlOod thlt Iheru are I numbe' 01 TPOs on the slta, The cost of dl1Yeloplng I~

site could theraloltl l>e IItlatiVtlly high The lo:ss of lhB e~Istlng amployml1nl use will need to ba )Jstilied In policy larm~. In the CUmlnl marl<et conditions, Ihe cost of del"-'<lring thi$ ~Ue oould plltjooice lis c:leliYery In the $hort term Site is in a sustainable location and Uis (l(X:Upied by two existing dwellings. The planning hiStory of the site records two dlsmlSSlls at appeillor Hi units The dwelling~

on the site ara bath large and there/Q1"<l the cost of develop;ng the site is likely to be "datively high It Is not dear whether a units 06 adequate to secure me "'abllity elthe site in the current IT\llfket conditions. The site Is ewned by Mole Velley Houllng Association who have indiCBtad their Intenlion to Updlle the heuslng stock. No appliCltions haVll been submitted to dlte It is understood fh.at the e~Istinll houses are OCOJp>ed and will be rehoused In new units. The timesclle for ~ivery could be constrained by this Issue Site Is in a sustainable location and COmprises substantial garden allla for existing dwelHngs. Planning history records two recent refuSlls, noweVllr similar development has been permitted nearby Planning will need to addre:ss potential impact on SAC, Site In a sustainable location wrthin built up area. Site already ocx:uped largely by existing buildings and hardsurlaclng, Planning application would need to address the loss 01 a community facility and demonstrate other community provision is available Iocilly. GiVlln the amount of buildings on the site, the current market conditions may deter develOllers In the short term Site In a sustainable location on edge of settlment and has defensible boundaries IS a result ofe~isting roads and train line. The site Is relatively open and gltloofield nature, Site Is in greenbelt and impact of housing development on the greenbelt may be slgnificanl due to Ihe openness of the slte, a planning application is therefoltl unlikely to be successful dUB to POlICy

31

Assessment of Mole Valley Disbict Council's Five and Ten Year Housing land Supply

ENV2. The s~e would therefore need to be pursued through the Land Allocations OPO, which is scheduled for adoption in December 2011. A subsequent planning application would require preparation and determination time. These timescaKls are such that the deliYllfY 01 the site in the short term is uncertain. Application would need to address the landscape impact and potential noise mlli9fltion may be required. r

MV44 HS018 Dorklng Library Depot, Buill up area. sustainable, other Site In sustainable location within buill up area, Guildford Road.

Do"". community facilities on site, surplus to Surrey County Cooncil

Sile already occuped largely bye~isling

buildings and hardsurfacing Planning application would need to address the loss of a community facility and demonstrate other

", community provision is available locally. Given the amount oIbuildings on the sile.the current

MV45 HS019 KnoleCrolt Built up area, sustainable, known

markel condilions may deter developers in the short term, Site in reasonably sustainable location, wilhin ."

Woodlancls and Merrivale, Longfield

developer interest settlement policy area. Aerial photography inclicates a number of mature species of trees " '

Road. DOOling on the site, which may reduce the developable area. Sile sIlualad adjacent Millon Country Park - impact will need to be addressed in a planning .., application, Site is occupied by three properties, the cost of which could delay development in the current market conditions. II is not clear whether7 dwellings would be adequate to guarantee viability 01 the site ..,

MV<6 HS024 Vincent Walk Industrial Buill up area, sustainable, in Site in sustainable location wilhin bUill up area, Area. South Street employment use, predominately Sile already occuped largely by existing

~,

Corking residential area, pre appl;eation buildings and hardsurfacing. Planning enqUiries application would need to address the loss of a

employment use, potential contamination Issues would also need to be addressed, Cost of

., MV" "=, 96 Lower Road,

Fetcham Buill up area, sustainable, known developer Interest, ongoing discussions with developer.

deveioping site may delay delivery in current market condilions Sile comprises a substantial garden for an existing dwelling, within the settlement boundary and in a relatively sustainable location. Site appears relatively unconstrained, though existing trees on site boundary may reduce developable area.

_I .,., MV48 HS029 Rentwood. School

Lane. Fetcham Buill up area. sustainable except for train, in community use. Surrey County Council identified that site may become surplus In

Sile in sustainable location In built up area. Site in community use, new development therefore need to incorporate community use or justify loss, Sile is largely occupied by existing

.,

... Mure, buildings and hardsurfaclng, which could

increase the cost 01 development. in current

MV49 "SOO, Leatherhead Hosprtal, Poplar road. Leather Head (land at)

Buill-up area, sustainable, PCT looking to rfMew property portfoiio and site may become available.

markel condilions cost may cause delay. Site in sustainable location within buill up area. Unclear whether site is available or still required for hospital purposes, S~e is relatively

"I,.. unconstrained, market conditions may deter

HS038 Leatharhead Sortinll Offica. Station Road. Lealherhead

Buill-up area. sustainable, in employment use, site may become available in next five ,...

delivery In the short tenn S~e Is In a susta~abla location and appears to be relatively unconstrained, The s~e is occupied by a large number of e~isting buildings and the cost 01 developing the site could

j therefore be relatively high. The loss 01 the e~isting employment use will need to be Justified in policytenns In the curr-ent market ~ conditions, the cost 01 delivering this s~e could prejudICe ~s delivery in the short term

MV51 HS039 Leatherhead Station Buill-up area, sustainable, s~e is S~e is in a sustainable location and appears to (land at), Randalls available, agents in contact w~h be relatively unconstrained, in the current Road, Leatherhead council. market condilions, the cost of delivering this site

could prejudice ils delivery in the short term. ~ S~e may have potential contamination problems and no1se associated wilh rail uses.

MV52 HS046 Land at Mole Hill, Buill up area, sustainable, TPO on Planning approved 2008, although Market may Reigate Road. DOfkinll site, 1100 metres of SAC, delay delivery, likelylhat four siles will come

developer Interest. forward by 2013 ~ MV53 HS047 4 & 6 Reigate Road, Built up area, sustainable, Planning approved 2008, although Market may Leatherhead developer Interest, delay delivery, likely that four sites will come

forward by 2013 MV54 "S048 85 Lower Road, Built up area, sustainable, TPOs Site Is in a sustainable location, in buill up area.

Felcham across s~e mainly on frontage, Sila appears rela~vely unconstrained e~cept for ~known developer Interest. TPOs, mainly on frontage. Site occupied by an a~lsting building, Market conditions may delay delivery,

MV55 HS049 Little Meads, Eastwick Buill up area, sustainable, TPO, Site Is in a sustainable location, in buill up area. Road. Bookham Site appears relatively unconstrained e~cept for ~ TPOs, mainly on frontage. S~e occupied by an

RogerTym & Partners ~ February 2009 32

III

Assessment of Mole Yaney District Council's Five and Ten Year Housing Land Supply

existing building. Markel.cond~ions may delay delivery

MV56 H~ Fomer Petrol Site, Ue Buift up area, sustainable, Site is in a sustainable location, in built up area. Street, Ashlead pu""hased by tesco pmposing to Site appears relatively unconstrllined llXCept

develop site for retail with 9 contamination Issues from petrol station use residential units may need to be addressed. Marketcondttions

may delay delivery. MIIS7 HS051 Sydney Simmons Built up area, sustainable, Site is in a sustainable location, In built up area.

Homes, 0_ Road, Site appears relatiYely unconstrained, Site AshIead currently occupied by e~isting buildings, cost of

developing coupled with market conditions may delay delivery.

M1158 HS052 1 LOoWlr Road l!o 34 Built up area, sustainable, TPOs Site is III a sustainable location, In built up area, Cobham R08d, aiong frontage and rear. Site appears relatively unconstrained, except for Fetcham TPOs. Site currently occupied by e~isting

buildings, cost of developing coupilld with market condttions may delay delivery, Understood that site Is available In medium term

MV59 HS053 123 - 127 Kinsgston Built up area, sustainable, Site is In a sustainable location, in bul~ up area, Road, Leathert1ead pedestrian safety issues, Site appears relatively unconstrained, Site

currently occupied by e~isting buildings, cost of developing coupilld with market oondttions may delay delivery.

MV60 HS054 Former County Library Built up area, very sustainable, Site is in a sustainable location, in bum up area, HQ, West Street, $Ile being marketed on behalf of Site appears relatively unconstrained, Site Dorking S\lrrey County Council as stte lor currently occupied by existing buildings, cost of

rvtalVresidential developing coupled with market conditions may delay delivery.

MI/62 HSOOO Magistrates COurts, BUild up area, sustainable, area Site currently has a policy designation DTC6 London Road, DoflIing safeguarded lor civic. which relates to cMc, entertainment. cultural,

enter1ainmenl, cultural. recreallonaland community purposes. The stta I. rElCf'eaUonaland communtty wllltharefore have It> address this constraint as

purposa. policy d"s'sJnalion part 0' a planning application or will nttOO to be change required pursued through the LDF. The site Is currently

occupied by buildings. which may add to 1I1e cost of d~opment and therefore delay delivery

I""

l.

c ... i.

[

[

c Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 33

• •

• • • • • •

• •

• •

• • • • • • • • •

• • • •

• •

Assessment of Mole Valley District Coundl's Five and Ten Year Housing Land Supply

, ,

Table 110

Sites identified in SHLAA - Rating of Outstanding Sites

1m' ....- F'PS3 DeHverebIIIty CfllerlI DeI\l1ll8blllly "of ...- ....- In 10,..- .-" ........

Subblilly AYliMllbIly ActIIeYabilly period 2008 - ·201' -"" -2013 "'" ""- --

2013- " -"''' MY" Unks RQ/ld {SO\J1h 7 3 7 7 0

Resldenlial Side), Ashlead-SrteA

" • • • , ~

MV35 Murrey's Court, A5h\ead 3 2 3 0 0 0 Parson's Mead SChool, SO 00 00 0""'" Remploy, Ermyn Way, 3MV35 ""'"'" • • 0" ", " ..Crossways and Corner , 3 , COttage, LEl/llheltlead Road, Boo~hllm

MV39 ""'"'" • • 0

• • ~.

MY40 Mlddlemeatl Road, 00 3 00 0 00 Boo~ham

MY" rio Dantly CrollllJl(l Lillie 0 ... ShepherdS, L&llthefhead Road, Bookham

MY42 AduK Education Centre, 3 3 0 " ~•

Dene Street, DorkinQ " " MY43 Chalcraft NurSl!l'les, relgate 00 3 3 00 0 00• ...

Rood.Oorking MY« Dorklng Library Depot, 3 3 0 ...•

(il.Illdford Road, Dor~ing " " " Koale Croft, Wood~Jl(ls and 7 3 7 7 0MY" Merrivale, Longfield Road, Oorking '"I

MY" Vincent Walk Industrial 14 3 3 14 0 14 Area, SoUlh Street Darking , • ...

MY47 9S Lower Road, Fetcham 3 8 8 0• • ,Rentwood, School Lane, 7 3 3 7 0•MY'" F8ICham '"I

MY" Leatherhead Hospital, 3 0 Popwr road. Leather Head " " " ... (111M at)

MYOO l.eathemead Sorting Office, 3 3 3 0 32 S18lion R08d, Leathertlead " " • ...'"IMY" Leathemead Station (land 80 3 3 80 0 80 Sll, Randalls Road, Laatheltlead Land at Mole Hill, Reigate 7 7 0MY"

, • • •Road,Oorking MY53 4 & 6 Reigate Road. 8 8 0• • • • '"I

LeatheltleM 3 0 oJ85 l...Ower Road, F(lIcl\8m

Little Mellds, EIISlWick 0 """ ROM, Bookhllm • • • • • •""" , , , ..MY56 Fomer Petrol S,te, The 3 0 Str981., Ashteaa

MY57 Syaney Simmons Hames, 0 3 0 0 0 ... Dene Road, Ashtead

MY58 1 Lower Road & 34 3 3 0 CObham Road, Fetcham

MV56 123 - 127 Kinsgston Road, 0 3 0 0 0 Leathamlllld

• • :l MYOO Former County Library HO, 30 3 30 30 0

Wes Street, Oorklng MY61 Pumping Station, River 8 3 3 8 8 0•

Lane, Feteham MV52 Magistrates Courts, London 3 • 3 10 0 ~

Road, Darking " " MY63 Pippbrook, Relgale Road, 120 3 3 120 0•

Dorkifl\l "" ~ Soo=

RTP assessed rating of deliverab;lity and limescale lor delivery. In assessing whether s~es will be deliverable in the first 5 years, we have used the estimellKllime frame In 1M SHLAA es a starting point.

~

Roger Tym & Partners ~ February 2009 3'

~

---

Assessment ot Mole Valley District Councirs Five and Ten Year Housing Land Supply

Table 12A

Sites outside the Built up Area identified in SHLAA

s..... ExpectedbyWIO ExpectedbyWIO TOO ~,..- come fclwerd ... 111111: NIl (lDl'.'_1C8d II'" five yell'S (200II

20131 12013- 2018l (MY)

GodIIrIin~'s Nursery, Ok:! Horsham Road, HSOO7 20 0 20 No Beare Green TUmble<l"""" Farm. 'M1eelers Lane, HS012 0 No Brockham

-"'- -_... " "

capel House Farm, Capel HS013 0 No Chak:raft Nurnerle&, reigate Road, Oofking HS016 0 OJ " OJ " '0 "'a~ey Mead. Ridllll"®' Road, Darking HSQ21 0 '0"=8 " 55 " NoElmerWorks. Hawl<.li Hli. Feteham 0 55 Between 36-69 R8nQalls Road, Leatherhead 0 No

"""3Clare Crescenl. Le8lherhead ""'" 20 " 0 " 20 No Land ill Randall's Road {rio 5 - 33}. 0 18 18 No lealherhead """" Land offlhe Fairway. Leatherhead (ioch.lCling 0 55 55 No"""8reserve Housing SlIe HS033) Randalls Road/Cleave Road Lllalhemead "'040 0 No rio Springfield Road, Weslcon 40'" 0 40 No Land at Gulldlord Road, GrBat BDO~hllm ""'" ,,, ,,, No

'" "S088 0

Land al Great Turners Wood, Highlands 0 '0"S058 Road, Beere Green " " Former sewage Works/Open laM HS057 0 20 20 '0 Land and buildings at RartMllih. Cha~wood 0 '0 Lane, Harley """" " "

Mole Valley Strategic Housing I...8nd AvallBbll~y Assessment. NO'IIImb'llr 200B

,

-r-l

e c c c c C RogerTym & Partners

FebrualY 2009 35

r


Table 12B

Sites outside Built Up Area identified in SHLAA - Planning Status at

01/01/09

........- ........ ~r$'s Nursery, 0111 Horsham Roal1, Beare Green Tumllledown Farm, Wheelers Lllne. Brockham capel House FaITR Capel Chalcraft Nurseries, relgate Road, Dorking Marley Mead. Ridgew"Y Road. Dorklng ElmerWorl<s. Hawks Hill. >"""m Between 36-69 Randalls Road. !.ealhemead Clare Crescent. Leatherhood

Land at Randalrs Road (rio 533},leathert1ead Land of Me Fairway, Leathert1aad {including reserve Housing S~e HS033) Randalls Road/Cleave Road, Laatherhaad rio Springfield Road. Westeott

Land at Guildtord Road, Graat Bookham Land at Great Turners Wood, Highlands Road. Beare Green Former Sewage Works/Open

"'"dLand and buildings al Ranworth, Chartwood Lane, Horley

HSOO7

HS012

HS013 HS016

HS02'

HS028

HSOO'

HSOO3

H'''''

H""

H""O

H'o«

H""

HS056

HS057

H""

Source: M<lie Valley online planning records

,. NO relev1lnt planning history tound

No relevant planning history found

Planning history relatas to Capel House and not to the land 'Nithln the red line 01 HS01 3 NO felevant planning history found

Site alkx:ated in Local Plan as Reserve Housing Site. M0J2001/1087 Residential development on 1.3 hecl.ares of land. Refused Septambar 2001 No relevant planning history

No relevant planning histo<y

SUe allocated in Local Plan as RlISi/rvi/ Housing S~e.

recorded. No relevant planning history


.,

.1 No further planning hlSlory

-Site allocated in Local Plan as Reoorve I-t>usinljl Site No fUrthi/r planning hislOry recorded. Site allocated in Local Plan as Reserve I-t>using SUII. No further p1l1nnlng hlSlory recorded No relevant planning history

No relevant planning hlSlory


MOI200710867 OUlline application forlha oonsideratlon oIlayoUl, means 01 ac.cess and landscaping for the extension and conver:>ion OI(JlO;islinljl dwelllnljl inlo 12 apertfTllll1ls. and demol~ion 01 existing Industrial blJildlng and erection of 15l1w9l1ings.. (RlISUbmi5liion of withdrawn application MO/2006/0842) REFUSED lAND DISMISSED ON APPEAL}

j

j

...""i

...""

RogerTym & Partners February 2009 36

j


Table 12C

Sites outside the Built up Area identified in SHLAA- Assessment of

Outstanding Sites RTP- ......... RTP RlilNllIlIng

HSOO7

MY65 HS012

MV" HS013 Capel House GnHmbelt on edge III Farm, Capel settlement,

sU\i!ainable e.cept for train

HS016 ChalcrBll. Gr&fl(lbflll On edge III Nursenes, Corking, sU81alnable, regate Road, A.... of Great Corking Landscape Value,

slight slope, developer interest

HSO" Marley Mead, Allocated as reserveMV" Ridgeway she. Gfeenfleid she Road. Dofking adjoining buih up area.

Aellal photography indicates substantial boundary trees. S~e

within AONB, however is visually enclosed by trees, thefefore impact likely to be minimsed.

HS028 ElmerWorks, Green B,,~, adpna"""[

c c HSO"

c

Godwms's Green beh, separated Nursery, Old from settlement by Horsham Road, railway line, Beare Green surrounded by existing

SffiiIII commercial unhs, sustainable.

Tumbledown GllIenbeh on edge of Farm, Wheelers settlement, Lene, sustainable, Grade II Brockt'am Li\i!1td Building,

employment use

Hawks Hill, treatment works, Fetcham sustainable.

Between 36-69 GllIenbeh. adjacent to Rendalls Road, raserve h<.>l's'ng ";"', Lootherilood long and nalTl7l¥ with

tree tinln9. svstalnable

The site is in nursary use, whiCh is classified as agncuhural and therefora not previously d_lOped. Thll &11& Is howlMIroocupled by .~isting

gla$ShOusing and oth&r buildings Ind Is surrounded by some l;rll!lll commercial unll8 Tha impact ofhoosing deYeIQ$lm<ent <;In the greenbelt may not be signiflcllntly great&r than th. impact cflhe e.i$ling buildings, however tt ~ unliltlllythllllhis site ....ould be SUCOll$$ful as a planning application doo to Policy EMJ2 The she W<luld therafolll nMd to be pursued thrOL.lQh the Land AIIOC;!Itiona OPO, which Is 8dleduled for adoption in Oecember 2011 A planning appliCation would require preparaUon and determination time These timeocal&fi, affl such that the delivery olthe site in the short term is uncertain The sile is occupied by an existing .,.....,lling Bnd an adjCllnlng builders yard. The impact 01 housing development on Ihe greenbeh may nol be significantly grealer than the Impacl of the e.isting buildings. hOWONer h is unlikely that this sile would be successful as a planning appliciltion due 10 Policy EMJ2. The site would thefflfoffl need to be pursued Ihrough the land Allocations OPO, which Is scheduled for adoption in OBC'llmber 2011. A further consideration for policy Is the e.i\i!ing employment use and the Listed Building on the site. A planning application would requi(fl preparation and determination time. These timescalesare sueh lhat Ihe delivery oIth& site in the short term is uncertain. The she is an open greenfield site, Thll impact ofhousing development on the greenbell may be slgnlflcanl due to the openness of the site. a planning appllcatk>n Is therefof8 unlikely to be successful due to Policy ENV2 The site would therefore need to be pursued through the Land Allocations DPO, which Is SCheduled for adoption in December 2011. A subsequent planning application would require preparation and determination time. These timescaies are such thaI the delivery of the she in Ihe short lerm is uncertain. Site in a sU81ainabkllocation on edge 01 settlment and has defensible boundaries as a resu~ ofexisting mads and lrain line. The stte Is relatillllly open and greenfield nalu(fl. Site Is In greenbeh and impact of housing development on the greenbelt may be signlflCant due tothe openness of the site, a planning appHcation is therefore unlikely to be successful dueto Policy ENV2. The site would therefore need to be pursued through the Land Allocations OPO, which is scheduled for adoption in Oecemb&r 2011. A subsequent planning applica~on would IlIqulre plllparation and determloation time, These Ilmescaies are such that the delivery olfhe $lie in 11'1'11 shorttarm ks uncertain. Appliciltion ....ould need to address the landscape impact and potential nl}lse mhiyatil}n may be re..... i~.

Sttewill only wme l\lfWard if a housing shOr1la1l becomes apparent. Site understood 10 be allllilable to< dlJlllllopmenl.

The s~& Is an open greenfield site, ~ Is hClweverSUfT<>unded by existing d8\l8iQpment, including housing. The impact oIhousing delllllopment on 11'1'11 greenbeH may be aignlflcarTt due til the openness of the site. a planning application is therefore unlikely to be succes.sful dUO! to Policy ENV2. The s~e would th&refl:lAl Med to bill pursued through the land Allocations OPO, which IS seJledulld for adQjl\lon in December 2011 A subsequent planning application ....ould reqUifll pfllparation Bnd determinatK>n tim". These IimellCales are suCh tnat the delil/llrY oflne stte In the short term Is ur.:ertain

The she is an open gre"nf",ld she, The imPll"t of housing development on Ihe greenbeh may be significant due to the openness oflhe site, a planning applicillion is therefore unlikely to be successful due to Policy ENV2, The she would therefore need to be pursued through the Land Allocations OPO, which Is scJleduled for adoption in December2011. Asubsaquant planning appllcalkln would require preparation and determination lime, Th8S'll Ilmescales are such thalthe delivery of the site In the short lerm Is uncertain. The shape 01 any Mure development would be linear and would be likely to result In a significant numberol new accesses onto Randall, Road which may be a significant constraint.

c MV71 HS033 Clare Crescent, Allocated BS reserve Ahhough the she is available for development. The site would Nl8ll to be leal~erl1ead site. The sne is an pursued through the Land Allocations OPO, which is scheduled lor adoption

c Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 37

r


W72 HS034 Land at Randall's Road (rio 5 - 33), leatherhead

Mfl3 HS035 Land of f1he Fairway, LeatOOrhead (Indudlng ,-~

Housing Site HS033)

MV74 HS040 Randalls RoadlCleeve Road, Leatherhead

MV75 HSO« rio Springfield Road, Westcott

Mfl6 Land at Gulldlord Road. Great Bookham

Mfl' "5055"_ Land al Great

Turners Wood. Highlands Roed. Beare

""'"

Mfl' HS05' Former Sewage Worl<.slOpen,,,'

""'" "_ land and buIldings at

open Greenfleld s~e,

though ~ has defensible boundaries created by existing housing. \tie railway line and the A243. The impact of housing development 00 lhe greenbe~ may be significant due to the openness oflhe site, a planning application is therefore unlikelylo be successful due to Policy ENV2, Greenbe~, adjacent to reserve housing s~e.

lXlIential access problems.

Greenbelt (majority), n\lisy, sustainablll, available.

Allocated as reserve s~e. adjoins bulk up area. SKe Is a greenfield site in a relatively open locallon. Reserve sKe oniy likely to come forward If a shol11all occurs. Allocated as reserve site, adpns bUill up area, SKe Is a grOOl1field site in a relatively open location, Nonhern pan of slle in Flood Zone 3 and may therefore be challenging to demonstrate compl~nce with seguent~1 test. Greenbelt, adjoins buill up area, sustainable. house builder promoting

Greenben. adjoins built up IIl'1la. SUlllliflllble. part of lalger site owned by counCil, ownership InInsferred to Mole Valley Housing A88OCia~on

GreenbeK, adjoining IIlliage. sustainatle. Flood Zone 2. part Flood Zone J. TPO and signil'icilnt tAlolIS, sKe been submitted by agent Greenbelt, e~lsting

houae, northern part

In December 2011. A subsequent planning application \/IlJuld rvquirv preparation and determlnatKltl time, These tlmescales are su::h thatlhe duliVllry of the site in the short term is uncertain. A future applicll\loo \/IlJuld need lQ address potential noise assooated w~h too road lind raitway line.

The site is an open groenfield sita The impact 01 t'ouling deveiopment on the greenbe~ may be s'llnifiCllnl due to Itle opennass 01 the slla. a planning application is \hefefurv unlikely to be successful due 10 Policy ENV". The site would therefore need 10 be pun;ued through Ihe Land Alloclllklns DPD. which is scheduled lor adoptKltl in DllCllmber 2011, A subseQuent planning application would requilll preparation and dehmninat\ln time These ..' tlmescales are such thallhe delivery \lIthe slle in thll shorllerm is uncertain. The S~ll is an \lpen greenfield slle, th\lugh ~ has defensible boundaliBs created by existing hOUlling. the railway lina and thll "243 Too impact 01 .., housing development on the greenben may be signif0C3nt dUll 10 the openness of the slle, a planning appllcllllon II therefore unlikely 10 be -,successful due to Policy ENV2, The site would thereforv nIBd to be pursued through the Land Allocations DPD, which is scheduled lor ad\lption in December 2011. A subsequent planning appllCillion would require preparation and determlnatkln time These tlrrescales are S\lCh that the ~ delivery of the slle In Ihe short term ~ uncertJin, A lutUI'& applicati\ln would need to address potential noise aS60Claled with the road and railWlllY line

~,

SlIewili only come forward if a hOO$ing shoJl1i>1I OOc\lmas apparent. Sile understood to be available for d8veloprrenl. ~

011\ .oJ

Reserve sKe only IIke1yto corre Iorward II a shortfall occurs. Pari of site subject to flooding. may Iherefore lail sequential \9SI. .,

..J

j Too s~e is an open greenfiald site, though II has defensible boundaries created by existing housing snd f08d The impact 01 housing deveiopment on the greenbeK may be significant due 10 lhe openness olthe s~e, s planning applltdon Is therefore unlikely to be successful dueto Policy jENV2. The site would therefllre need to be pursued through the Land Allo<:atlons DPO. whk;h Is scheduled for adoption In December 2011, A subsequent planning awlicstion would require pftlparalion and determlnatian ~me. These tlmescs~s are such that the delivery oIthe site in the sh<.lrl term is uncertain j The site Is an open greenfield silfl, though ~ has defensible boundaries Cn:lSted by e.istlng housing snd road. The Impact of housing development on the greenbelt may be ligniticantdue to the openness of the site, a .. planning "l'lplic"tion is merefore unlikely 10 be suceeS51u1 due to Policy , ENV2, The silfl_uld therefllre need to be pursued through the Land ... Allocations OPO, wtIich IS scheduled for adoption in December 2011. A sub9equent plllnning lIppllcllllon would require preparation and determination lime These ~mescale$ are S\lCh that the delivery oIlhe site In the sMn term is u~rtaln

~ Site appear'S wry Ctlostrained by tIo<'lding May be diflicu~ 10 demonstrate the sequential test and nat 08J18ln lhaI the exception testwould apply. S~e

therefore consideAld t<l be undelivefable. Site also Ctlnslralned by greenbelt and fPD. Srte theAllore very CtlnSlrllined,

~ Silfl sppesn; partially constrained by flooding. which may alleast reduce the developable ares. Srte also Ctlnstrained by !lreenbe~ and TPO. The

~

Roger Tym & Partners ~ February 2009 38

I!

.1


Ranworth, Flood Zone 2, TPOs imp;oct 01 housing development on the 9reenbe~ may be significant despite Charlwood e~istill9 buildings on the 5Ite, II planning appliCil~on is therefore unlikely to Lane, Harley be su<;cosslUl due to Policy ENV2. The aile WOuld therefore need to be

P'Jl'liued through the Land Allocations DPD, who::h 18 scilllduleod for adoption In Oeo:;ember 2011. A subsequent p1annlng application would require preparati\Jn and d6terminabon ~me. These ~mallClllBs are such thatlhe delivery oIthe aile In the short term Is uncertain.

--~

----,-.. .-.. ... I. .-

Rogerlym & Partners I.. February 2009 3.

r


Table 120

Sites outside the Built up Area identified in SHLAA - Rating of

Outstanding Sites ,AW Shac:ldl1lSS ........ PPS3 0e1Verablly CrIer1II .-..

In 10year... ...""', A_ _2008- ...-- ...-".......fQl: 5 yeerSuhblllly _2008- ""....'" .... -2013 2013-2018.. , .. --.. •MV64 Godwins's 3 3 0

Nursery, Old Horsham Road, Beare Green ,MY65 Tumbledown 27 3 3 27 0 27 Farm, Wheelers -! Lane, Brockham , .1MY66 Capel House 10 3 3 0 10 Farm, Capel , "

MYOI Ctlalcrafl 3 3 0 Nurseries, reiQiIle "' "' "' "'!Road,Oorklng

MV," M8rley Mead, 30 3 , , 30 30 0 .1 Rklgeway Roa<I, Dotking ,MY" Elmer Worl<s, 55 3 3 55 0 55 Ha'<Ol<s Hill, '"I FeK:ham ,""'0 Between 36-a9 3 3 0 Rlndl'lils ROM, '" '" Leatherflead .. , , '"

.1

Clare Cres~nt, 3 '" 0 Ll'l8Ihl'lrflead

MV" Laflll at Rafldall's 18 3 , 3 18 0 18 Road (rio 5 - 33), lealnerhl'lall

""" '" j Land of fttle 65 3 3 65 0 55""'3 , '"IFairway, Leathemead .. (ir'lCluding resefVe Housing glle HS033)""', Randalls 70 3 , 70 0 RoadlCleeve jRoad, Lealhemead""', rfo Springfield 40 , , , 0 0 0 Road, Westeotl Land al Gulldford 3 03 ", ", j""" Road, Great '"

, Bookham ,MVnl Lafld at Great 3 3 0 Tumers Wood, " " " ,Highlands Road, Beare Green , ..

MVnl Former Sewage 3 0 0 0 Works/Open Land '" , ,MY", Land and 3 0 buildings ill " " j" Ranwonh, CharlWood Lane, Harley

'""~ RTP 1IS5e'!Sed rating of deti'Mrabll~and ~mescale for dellvely. In aSSllssmll whelhllr sitel;""m bIl deliverable in the first 5 years, 'N!! have used the estimated time frame in the SHLAA as a ~ slarllnQ point

~

~

I Roger Tym & Partners IFebruary 2009 40

I

APPENDIX 5

Assessment of housing land supply in

Chichester District •

-.

-------I'"

I.

i'•

cccc

APPENDIX 5 ASSESSMENT OF CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL'S FIVE AND TEN YEAR HOUSING LAND SUPPLY

February 2009

•

" ,.

,.

,..

,.. ,..

cccccc , ,r'"

CONTENTS 1

2

3

4

INTRODUCTION 1

HOUSING TARGETS FOR CHICHESTER DISTRICT 2

West Sussex Structure Plan 2

South East Plan 2

STOCK OF DELIVERABLE HOUSING SITES IN CHICHESTER DISTRICT •.•...........•. ..4

Category (a): Realistic Commitments identified 1st April 2008 " 6

Category (b): Further small sites expected to come forward 7

Category (c): Further large sites expected to come forward 8

Category (d): Further previously developed land expected to come forward 9

CONCLUSION; HOUSING TARGET VS. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DELIVERY •....•••••... 11

Deliverable housing provision - 5 year period (2008 to 2013) 11

Deliverable housing provision - 10 year period (2008 to 2018) 12

Estimated shortfall in housing provision 13

ANNEXA - Additional Tables

...

...

-.. I""

... ---

Assessment of Chichester District Coundl's Five And Ten Year Housing Land Supply

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 This report has been prepared in support of the planning application for a mixed use

scheme to include 2,600 new dwellings (Class C3) at Dunsfold Park. It ex;amines

the housing targets set by the West Sussex Structure Plan and the South East Plan,

and compares these to the estimates of housing potential prepared by Chichester

District Council (the Council) and its consultants.

1.2 Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3), at paragraph 54, requires that local

planning authorities identify sufficient deliverable sites in order that housing can be

provided in the first five year period. PPS3 states at paragraph 71 that if local

planning authorities cannot demonstrate a five supply of housing, then planning

applications which come forward for housing development should be considered

favourably. In the light of this recent government policy statement, the Council's

!" deliverable supply of housing in the first five years -i.e. from 2008 to 2013 - has

!. been assessed.

1.3 Paragraph 55 of PPS3 requires local authorities to identify a further supply of -specific deliverable sites for years 6 to 10. Paragraph 59 of PPS3 further states that

windfall sites and allowances should not be included within the first 10 years of land c supply. Thus, in addition to examining a five year period, the Council's supply of

housing over a 10 year period (2008 to 2018) has also been assessed, in order to

establish whether the Council has sufficient deliverable housing over this period

without the addition of assumed windfall developments.

1.4 The analysis here is based on financial years (April to March) but to aid clarity '2008 c to 2013' is used to designate the period 1st April 2008 to 31 st March 2013. Similarly,

'2008 to 2018' means lSI April 2008 to 31 st March 2018. c 1.5 This assessment concludes that, based on detail in PPS3 and emerging practice

gUidance, the Council appears to be likely to meet the latest housing targets in the c first 5 years (2008-13), with a potential surplus of 524 dwellings. However, there

c are a large number of dwellings where development is not certain, if these sites do

not come forward, there is likely to be a shortfall of 715 dwellings over the five year

periOd. Furthermore, the Council is unlikely to meet the housing targets in the first

10 years (2008-2018), with a shortfall of between either 1,387 or 3,045 dwellingsc depending on whether one includes those sites which are considered to be

uncertain.

c c

Roger Tym & Partners

C February 2009

r

Assessment of Chichester District Council's Five And Ten Year Housing land Supply

2 HOUSING TARGETS FOR CHICHESTER DISTRICT

West Sussex Structure Plan

2.1 The West Sussex Structure Plan, adopted in February 2005, sets out the housing

requirements for local planning authorities for the period 2001 to 2016. Policy NE1:

Level of Residential and Employment Development sets a requirement for the

Council to provide some 7,105 net additional dwellings between 2001 and 2016.

2.2 Until the adoption of the South East Plan, the West Sussex Structure Plan remains

part of the development plan for the borough. The policies within the Structure Plan

are 'saved' until October 2007 under the provisions of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. In March 2007, West Sussex County Council (SeC) sought a

direction from the Secretary of State to save the majority of its Structure Plan -policies until the adoption of the South East Plan. It was confirmed in September

2007 that these could be saved, which included Policy NE1.

,23 Thus Policy NE1 requires the Council to provide a total of 7,105 net additional dwellings over the period 2001 to 2016. This equates to 474 dwellings per annum

over this 15 year period. Table 1 below shows remaining Structure Plan j requirement after completions, as at 151 April 2008, have been deducted: .. Table 1 • Structunt Plan Housing Requirement for Chichester DC ,

Total Average annual provision

Structure Plan target (2001 to 2016) 7,105 474

Completions (2001 to 2008) 2,860 409

Remaining requirement (2008 to 20t6) 4,245 531

Source: CDC Annual Monitoring Report. Decembef 2008

2.4 As Table 1 shows, new housing has been delivered in the Council's area at a below

that required for the first 7 years of the 15 year Structure Plan period. Thus the

annual rate required increases to 531 for the remainder of the period to 2016.

However, the Structure Plan is very soon to be superseded by the South East Plan

(see below) which incorporates higher housing targets for the Council.

South East Plan

2.5 The Panel Report for the South East Plan (SEP) was published on 29th August ~ 2007. The Secretary of State published Proposed Changes (SSPC) to the SEP in

July 2008. The emerging SEP is thus at an advanced stage of preparation and is a I Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 2 I

I


significant material consideration in the determination of planning applications in the

district.

, .

2.6 The Submission Draft of the SEP proposed that a total of 28,900 new houses per

annum for the region but the subsequent Panel Report recommended that this be

increased 32,000 per annum. Policy Hl of the draft SEP sets out the housing

requirement for the period 2006 to 2026 for each local authority within the region.

The requirement for Chichester has been increased by the Panel Report from 430

to 480 new dwellings (net) per annum. Thus the minimum required total is 9,000

dwellings for the period 2006 to 2026. No further increases were proposed in the

SSPC, and the increases proposed by the Panel Report were endorsed. Therefore

the housing level in the consolidated SSPC is the basis of this assessment.

I. 2.7 Table 2 below shows the remaining SSPC requirement after completions as at 151

April 2008 have been deducted:

L

Table 2 - South East Plan SSPC Housing Requl",mant for Ch_r DC

To1al Avenge annual provision

South East Plan Panel Report target (2006 to 2026)

9,600 480

Completions (2006 to 2008) 777 389

Remaining Illqulnlmant (2008 to 2026) 8,823 490

c Source: For completions for the 2Q06 to 2008 periocl- CDC Annual Monitoring Report. December 200S

c 2.8 Table 3 below provides a comparison of the housing requirements for the Council

as set out in the Structure Plan and the Panel Report to the SEP.

Tabte 3· Comperlson of Chichester DC Housing Requirements

c To1al Average annual provision

Adopted Structure Plan (2008 to 2016) 4,245 531 c Panel Report to South East Plan (2008 to 2018) 4,901 490

c Notes:

1 Remaining requirement for periocl2008 to 2016 after completions for 2001 to 2008 have been deductedsee Table 1

2 Ten year housing requiremenl for period 2Q08 to 2018 has been calculated uSing the adjuSled average annual requirement (see Table 2) of 490.

c 2.9 The SEP's housing requirements will, on adoption, supersede those of the Structure

Plan. Based on the SSPC, the adjusted annual average requirement is 9% lower for

Chichester than that necessary to meet the remaining Structure Plan requirement. c Although the adjusted annual average requirement in the SSPC is still some 17%

higher than that achieved by the Council in the period 2001 - 2008.

c C Roger Tym & Partners

February 2009 3

r

Assessment of Chichester District Council's Five And Ten Year Housing Land Supply

3 STOCK OF DELIVERABLE HOUSING SITES IN CHICHESTER DISTRICT

3.1 The housing trajectory in the Council's Annual Monitoring Report (December 2008) . ,

is set against the current housing requirement set in the West Sussex Structure

Plan up to 2009 and against the SEP after 2009, when it has been assumed the

SEP will be adopted

3.2 The SEP is now significantly advanced with the publication of the Panel Report and

both the draft SEP and the Panel Report recommend increases in the housing -requirement for the district - from 474 per annum to 480 per annum. It is considered

that the housing target set in the Panel Report is a more realistic reflection of the -level of housing for which the Council will have to plan than that stated in the Structure Plan. Thus for this report, it is assumed that the housing requirement for

the Council is that stated in the SSPC and adjusted in Table 2 - namely 490 ~ , -' dwellings per annum.

3.3 The SEP is based on a 20 year period. The housing requirement for the Council has Jbeen calculated from the annual rate, as adjusted in Table 2, of 490 dwellings

namely 2,450 dwellings for the first 5 year period (2008 to 2013) and 4,900 ~

dwellings for the 10 year period (2008 to 2018). .., 3.4 The Council's Five Year Housing Land Supply of November 2008 sets out how the ...

Council intend to meet their housing requirement for the period 2008 - 2014. ..J However there is no indication of supply beyond this period, with the exception of a

small number of sites which the Council consider to be commitments, but are "'1unlikely to come forward in the first six years. This is in conflict with the -requirements of PPS3 to have a supply of developable sites for a 10 year period.

~

.,/3.5 The Council estimated that their housing provision will come forward from a number

of sources, namely: '"I .,/• Realistic Commitments identified 1st April 2008 (sites of 6 or more

dwellings);

,'"I• Further small sites expected to come forward; ...

• Further large sites expected to come forward;

• Further previously developed land expected to come forward.

3.6 The estimated contribution of each of these categories within Chichester's Five ... Year Housing Land Supply of November 2008 is summarised in Table 4 below. All

data is shown as net additional dwellings. j

0 Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 4 0

I


Table 4 - Chich...., DC OO1lmalad houslng auwly (2008 to 2018)'

Complellon sources Net dwellingswllhln first 8

Nat_=1 wllhln

10yaa, total

yIOrs (2008 4 yIOrs (2014 (2008 to to 2014) to 2018) 2018)

(a) Realistic Commitments identified 1,665 25 1,690

1 April 2008 (sites of 6 or more dwellings) (b) Further small sites expected to 399 o 399 come forward

(c) Further large sites expected to 1,129 201 1,330 come forward

102 o'. (d) Further previously developed land expected to come forward

• ,. ,, I. 3.7

3,5212263,295Total Sources: 1 CDC Five Year Housing Land Supply, November 2008

Thus the Council's Five Year Housing Land Suppty estimates that a net housing

\.. ,. i..

,. addition of 3,295 dwellings is feasible in the first 6 year period (2008 to 2014). To

calculate the supply for the 5 year period (2008 - 2013), the predicted net dwelling

completion for 2013 - 2014 must be deducted. This figure is 351 and has been

sourced from Chichester's Annual Monitoring Report, December 2008. A net

housing addition of 2,944 dwellings is feasible in the first 5 year period (2008 to

c 3.8 The Council has not provided an indication of the of the housing provision for the

2013).

c period 2014 - 2018, although within the list of realistic commitments (row ~a") there

are some 5 sites where all or part of the approved provision is estimated to be

provided after the first five year provision - totalling 25 dwellings. In addition, within

c the list of further large sites (row ~c") there are 2 sites where part of the approved

provision is estimated to be provided after the first five years - totalling 201

c dwellings.

2018).

A total 3,521 dwellings are feasible over the 10 year period (2008 to

c c

3.9 If these five and ten year estimates are robust estimates, the Council would meet

the latest SSPC requirement, as adjusted, of 2,450 for the five year period - a

surplus of 494 dwellings. However there would be a significant shortfall over the

latest SSPC requirement, as adjusted, of 4,900, for the 10 year period - a shortfall of

1,379 dwellings.

c 3.10 The Council's estimated completion sources (Le. rows 'a' to 'd' in Table 4 above)

are now assessed in the light of this latest, detailed guidance on deliverability.

c c Roger Tym & Partners

February 2009 5

[

102


Category (a): Realistic Commitments identified 151 April 2008

3.11 Chichester's Five Year Housing Land Supply, November 2008 lists, at Appendix 2,

all commitments that are considered realistic as at the 151 April 2008, regardless of

the actual size of the site. The list of sites comprises sites with planning permission

or sites allocated in the adopted Chichester Local Plan and are included in the West

Sussex County Council Housing Land Supply Assessment to 151 April 2008.

3.12 Some 54 sites are listed, providing a total of 1,690 net additional dwellings. The

Council considers that the majority of these sites (44 sites) are realistically

deliverable in the first five years to 2013. However there are some 10 sites where

the Council has indicated that all or a proportion of the approved yield of the sites is ,.unlikely to be provided in the first five years. The Council anticipate that a total of

,46 dwellings will be outstanding on these 10 sites after the five years to 2013. Thus

the estimated contribution from realistic commitments to the five year supply is ~

1,644 dwellings (See table 5A in the Annex to this report). 3.13 As detailed in Section 3 of the main Proof, it was not considered practical to carry ..

out detailed investigations in to the deliverability of each site. Therefore, only the -realistic commitments providing 6 or more net additional dwellings have been

assessed - some 50 of the 54 sites. As at 31 51 March 2008, 28 of the 50 sites of 6 or '" ... more net additional dwellings were under construction and therefore it has been

assumed that they are deliverable in the first 5 years. Thus the focus is narrowed to jthe remaining 22 sites where construction had not commenced. Two further sites

have also been also included in the assessment because at the time of Chichester's i"\site visits, construction had either ceased or only partly commenced on a large site.

The total number of sites to be assessed is therefore 24, these sites are listed in Table 58 (see Annex). ~ ... Assessing deliverability

3.14 All of the 24 sites to be assessed benefit either from planning permission or are j allocated in the Chichester District Local Plan. The fact that these sites have

planning permission or are allocated for development does not necessarily mean jthat they are deliverable. It was therefore necessary to carry out a further detailed

assessment as to the deliverability, as per the methodology detailed in Section 3.

Table 5C and 50 provide the reasoned assessment of the deliverabilily of these ~ sites.

3.15 Combining the results of Tables SA, 58, 5C and 50, the provision of housing from ~ small sites with planning permission is summarised in Table S below as follows:

~ Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 6 I

I


Table 5· Housing provtsloo from Small Silas

Rating Net dwoliings Net_lings 10 year In first 5 years In 88COnd 5 IDIaI

(2008'" years (2013 (2008'"2013) '" 2018) 2018)

CDC estimated 1,665' 25' 1,690 provision Deliverable provision Construction 573 8 581

commenced or less than 6 dwellings

Deliverable provision 4 or5 606 o 606 Uncertain provision 2or3 361 142 503 Undeliverable 1 o o o provision

i Chichester estimates are set Oul for a six year period from 2008·2014 and a subsequent four year period

from 2014 - 2018 ,. Category (b): Further small sites expected to come forward ,

,.,

3.16 Table One of Chichester's Five Year Housing Land Supply, November 2008 lists, a

supply of housing which is stated as coming from further small sites with planning

\. permission. The provision is split into two categories; sites with planning

permission, where construction has started and; sites with planning permission,

where construction has not started.

c 3.17 To calculate the contribution from further small sites, the Council assumed that

100% of sites with planning permission, where construction has started would come

fOlWard. and 45% of sites with planning permission, where construction has not .. started would come forward. The 45% calculation has been standard practice by

West Sussex County Council for a number of years. Details of the calculation have

not been set out in the Five Year Housing Land Supply. Paragraph A.9 of the Five -(. Year Housing Land Supply states "this calculation has been applied to identifying a

realistic expected delivery on small sites in the District over the 2008-2014 penOd~

c The 45% calculation has therefore be used for a six. year period, however the same

45% calculation was applied to further small sites in the November 2007 Chichester

Five Year Housing Land Supply, which was based on a five year period 2007 c 2012. As the standard approach is a five year housing land supply assessment, it is

considered that the 45% calculation is appropriate for the period 2008·2013.

c 3.18 For those sites already under construction, Chichester District were able to provide

c net figures. However for those sites where construction has not yet commenced a

calculation was applied to convert the gross figures to net.

3.19 The total contribution to the housing land supply for Chichester District from further

small sitesis 399 dwellings, which comprises:

~ Roger Tym & Partners February 2009

lW

c 7


• 195 (net) dwellings granted planning permission at 1st April 2008 where construction has already started.

• 163 (net) (231.3 gross) dwellings granted planning permission at 1st April 2008 where construction has not started.

• 41 (net) (51.75 gross) dwellings granted planning permission post April ,. !

2008.

3.20 As a result of the large number of sites that are likely to make up this total, and for

consistency with other assessments undertaken for neighbouring authorities, it was .' not considered practical to undertake detailed investigations to the deliverability of

each site. Thus the 45% delivery rate adopted for those sites not under construction -,has been adopted - which is less than the 90% rate used in the assessments for the

neighbouring authorities. -3.21 The provision from further small sites with planning permission is summarised in

Table 6 below as follows:

~

..,Table 6· Housing provision from further small sites with planning pennisslon -'

Not dWellings in Net dWellings In 10 year total first 5 years second 5 years (2008 10

(200810 2013) (201310 2018) 2018) , ICDC estimated provision 399' 0' 399 -Deliverable provision 399 0 399 ..

i Chichester estimates are set out for a six year period from 2008 - 2014 and a subsequent four year period ,from 2014·2018 -Category (c): Further large sites expected to come forward j

3.22 The Council's Five Year Housing Land Supply document (Table One) also states

that 1,129 dwellings are expected to be provided by fulther large sites with a clear ~ -commitment. The technical summary to the document (Appendix One) details the

sites that are included in this category - some 13 sites, which could provide a total of "" ...1,129 net additional dwellings in the period (2008 - 2014).

3.23 Table 7A in the Annex to this report provides a breakdown of each of these sites jand updates the current planning position. Nine of them are subject of an extant

have planning permission and the remaining sites are either the subject of current

applications pending consideration or where applications are anticipated. j Assessing deliverabilily

j3.24 Irrespective of the fact that the sites have planning permission it is still necessary to

assess whether the sites are actually deliverable. As with the realistic commitments

with planning permission above, it was necessary to carry out a further detailed ~ assessment as to the deliverability of these sites. Tables 78 and 7C provide the

reasoned assessment of the deliverability of these sites. .~ RogerTym & PartnelS February 2009 8 I

I


3.25 Combining the results of Tables 7A, 78 and 7C the provision of housing from further

farge sires is summarised in Table 7 below as follows:

Table 7· Housing provision from fur1ller large sites expected to oome forward Rating Net dwellings Net dW8IlliilIs Iii 10 year

In flnol 5 years second 5 years total (2008 to 2013) (2013 to 2018) (2008 to

2018) CDC estimated 1,129' 201' 1,330 provision

Deliverable provision 4 or 5 157 80 237

Uncertain provision 20r3 818 277 1093

Undeliverable 1 o o o provision

i Chichester estimates are set out for a Six year period from 2008 _2014 and a subsequent four year period

from 2014·2018

Category (d): Further previously developed land expected to I.

come forward

3.26 The Council's Five Year Housing Land Supply document (Table One) states that

102 dwellings are expected to be provided from previously developed land in the

,- period (2008 - 2014). Table 8A in the Annex to this report lists 11 sites that

constitute previously developed land and have potential for residenlial

development These sites were identified in the Council's Urban POlential Study

which was published to support the Core Strategy in 2006.

, 3.27 We now assess, in light of the requirements of PPS3, how likely it is that these sites

will deliver the potential assumed in the Five Year Housing Land Supply, November I.. 2008.

c Assessing deliverabi/ity ofthe sites

3.28 The assessmenl of the deliverability of these 11 sites is again based on the c methodology as set out in Section 3 of the main Proof. Tables 8B and 8e provide

the reasoned assessment of the deliverability of this site.

c 3.29 The results of the analysis of those sites identified as having housing potential is

presented in rabfe 8 below.

c c c c RogerTym & Partners

February 2009 9

32


Table 8 - Housing provision from A110catad Silas (Local Plan)

Dallwrablilly Rating Net dwellings in Nat dwelUng. In T"'I fir81S~rs saa>ndSrnolS (20081D

(20081D 13) (20131D 018) 2018)

CDC estimated 102' 0' 102 , , provision

Deliverable 4or5 0 32 provision

I'"~

62 0 62Uncertain 2or3 provision

Undeliverable 1 8 0 0 •provision (8') ~

I Chichester estimates are set out for a six year period from 2008 _2014 aru1 a subsequent four year period

from2014-2018

2A total of 8 dwellings are assessed as being undeliverable. --, ... -'

... • 1

,. I-

r-'

... I-/"

..'... ,... j

j

~

~ Roger Tym & Partners February 2009 10 ~

I


4 CONCLUSION: HOUSING MINIMUM TARGET VS. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DELIVERY

4.1 Table .. above lists the total housing provision that the Council believes that it can

deliver for the period 2008 to 2018, an estimation of the likely provision within the

first 5 years is provided at paragraph 3.7. This is now compared to the provision

which, in the light of the assessments using the criteria for deliverability in PPS3, is

considered to be realistically deliverable.

Deliverable housing provision - 5 year period (2008 to 2013)

4.2 Table 10 below shows a comparison of the Council's estimated housing provision

and the assessed housing provision for the period 2008 to 2013, in the first 5 years:

Table 10 - Total deliverable housing provision In the ftllll5 years (2008 to 2013)

Completion sources South Easl CDC estImatsd Total RTP Total Plan housing total In the ftllll ......ad RTP raqulnlment 5 years provlslon assessed

(2008 ~ (2008 to 2014) (2008 to provision2013) 2013) (2008 toI,.

,

Including 2013) unc:ertalq sxr:Iudlng,. provision uncertai~

provision

[

-

(a) Realistic 1,565 1,540 1,179

Commitments identified lSI April 2008 (sites of 6 or more dwellings) (b) Further small 399 399 399 sites expected to come forward

r (c) Further large 1,129 973 157 sites expected to ... come forward

102 62 oc (d) Further previously developed land expected to come c forward Adjustment of CDC (3,295 - 351)' figures to proVide five year period

c c TOTAL 2,450 2,944 2,974 1,735

Notes:' Based on the average annual provision set in the South East Plan Proposed Changes, as adjusted

490 dwellings.

2 Uncertain provision ~ has a dehverabllity rating of 2 or 3

J See paragraph 3.7 for further explanation

c c RogerTym & Partners

february 2009 11

c


4.3 From the analysis in section 3, the total deliverable housing provision for the

Council for the first 5 year period (2008 to 2013) is 1,735 net additional dwellings. A

funher provision of 1,239 dwellings could come from those sites where deliverability

is considered uncertain, thus giving a total yield of 2,974 net additional dwellings.

The requirement for the Council for the first 5 years, based on the SSPC annual

requirement, as adjusted, of 490 dwellings, is some 2,450 dwellings.

4.4 Based on the Council's estimations of provision for the first 5 years set, there would

be a surplus of 494 dwellings over the latest SSPC target of 2,450, as adjusted for

the five year period. Following the assessment as to the deliverability of the

identified sources in the Five Year Housing Land Supply, Chichester would either

have a surplus would of 524 dwellings if all deliverable sites (including those sites

considered to be uncertain) come forward, or would have a shortfall of 715

dwellings if those uncertain sites do not come forward.

4.5 PPS3 states at paragraph 71 that wwhere Local Planning Authorities cannot

demonstrate an up-to-date five year supply of deliverable sites they should consider

favourably planning applications for housing, having regard to the policies in this

PPS". In this case, it is considered that, if the uncenain sites do not come forward,

the Council would have a shortfall in their provision to 2013. Therefore further sites

which could deliver housing development will need to be identified and/or granted

planning permission.

Deliverable housing provision - 10 year period (2008 to 2018)

4.6 A comparison of the Council's estimated housing provision with the assessed

provision for the 10 year period of 2008 to 2018 is provided.

,

r"

..

,"

,.., , ~.

j

j



Table 11 - Total delivenlblo housing provIslon lor lull 10 yea'" (2008 10 2018) Completkm sources

(a) Realistic Commitments identified 1S! April 2008 (sites of 6 or more dwellings) (b) Further small sites expected to come forward (c) Further large sites expected to come forward (d) Further previously developed land expected to come forward

South East Plan

housing requlremanl

(2008 10 2018)'

CDC astImatlld

totsl (2008 102018)

1,690

399

1,330

102

TotalRTP Itsessed provision (200810

2018) including uncertain provision'

1,690

399

1,330

94

Total RTP BSsessed provision (200810

2018) excluding uncertain provIsion2

1,187

399

237

32

' TOTAL 4,900 3,521 3,513 1,855 Notes: i Based on the average annual provisioo sel in lI1e Soulh East Plan Proposed Changes, as adjusted·

490 dwellings.

2Uncertain provision -has a deliverability rabng of 2 or 3

4.7 For the 10 year period of 2008 to 2018, Table 11 above shows that there is a

potential yield from sites that are considered to be realistically deliverable of 1,855

dwellings (end column). To this figure a further potential yield of 1,658 dwellings

L. could come from those sites where deliverability is uncertain - thus giving a total

figure of 3,513 in the penultimate column.

- 4.8 In summary, it is considered that an estimate of total deliverable housing provision

for the Council for the period 2008 to 2018 is between 1,855 and 3,513 net

additional dwellings.

Estimated shortfall in housing provision

c 4.9 Based on the SSPC, the housing target for the Council for the period 2008 to 2018

c is some 4,900 dwellings. Based on the Council's estimated provision, the authority

would have a shortfall of some 1,379 dwellings. Following the assessment, this

shortfall is increased to 1,387 or 3,045 dwellings - depending on whether one

includes those sites which are considered to be uncertain in terms of actual c production.

4.10 The high level of uncertainty associated with development in Chichester relates c largely to the proximity of a number of sites to the Natura 2000 sites in the Solent

area. In order for development to progress in the District, all applicants will need to c c Roger Tym & Partners

February 2009 13

r


demonstrate "no significant harm~ to the internationally designated sites as a result

of recreational disturbance and increased waste water discharge into the

Chichester Harbour. Natural England are currently undertaking work to determine

the baseline situation and to evaluate the impact of additional development,

however this work is at a relatively early stage and may not therefore be available to

developers in the short-term. The timescale required to demonstrate "no significant

harm" and to provide appropriate mitigation measures may significanUy undermine

the delivery of a significant number of developments in the District.

4.11 It is understood that the Council are in the process of producing their Strategic

Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). The Council indicates that this will

be completed in Spring 2009. It is acknowledged that the SHLAA is likely to identify

various sites that the Council considers to have potential for housing development

and thus theoretically reduce the shortfall in housing supply that has been identified.

4.12 Nevertheless, the Council cannot currently identify a deliverable supply of housing

to meet the minimum housing targets set in the Emerging South East Plan, contrary

to the requirements of PPS3.

r

"",

, '.'

Roger Tym & Panners February 2009 14

APPENDIX 6 --_._-_._-- -----_.__._._._._.----

Location plans of potential housing sites (6

units or more)

I ,••

I..

'

c c c c [

[

r

.---,: LOO;<l,1 AuthorityL.........!II Boundary

Housing Application Sites

Small' 6-9 dwellings c:::J Large: >9 dwellings c:::J and" O.4ha

'----'1 Medium: "9 dwellings '-----J and <OAha·

'I M Ert';f,~~ ."'~' ~ -f ~ '~-.. -II. i \ "..rn.Eii n Tllis map is reproduced lrom Ordnanco Survoy material wilh the permi&sion of Ordnance Survey on betmlf of tho Controller of Her Majestys Slalionary Office ~ Crown 'copyriglll. Unauthorised repr'Qduction Is an Inffingement of Cr<JWn copyright and may lead 10 prosecul'OIl' or civil proceedings, 10000231'2, 2008. ,. e· ~

~.. - ~l .~

1.

Local Authority Boundary


Small: 6-9 dwellings

Large: >9 dwellings and> o..4l:1a

Medium: >9 dwellings and <O.4ha

t::! ., A .------ ,

This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey malenal with the permission of Otdnance Survey on beha 'CQnlrolier ol_Her Majesty's Stationary Office C> Crown copyright. Unaulhorised reproduction is an infringe -I ~f Crown copyri~!.::lnd may,lead 10 prosecution or civil proceedings_ 100002312, 20!lS-:.. _ ,

500

Local' Authorityc:J1 Boundary



Large: >9 dwellings and> O.4ha

MedIum: >9 dwellingsc=J 'and <O.4ha

'I -'fl..,..,.,t..QlI JCa'J:,.'i.a-"":.- J1"-. ,..-v- --~'-""-i' - •. "" .,. -- ." - .(. This map 1III rIlPllldu<:;ed liom Ord.ijfinCe Survey malerial wilh the permisslOfl of Ordnance Survey on behall' of the

I Conlroher of H~r Majesty's Stationary, Offi,iCe ~ ~roYl,n copyright UnaulhC?rised reproduc!ion is lin Inf~ngeme.n1 of CrovmcopyriIjU, IIfdF!ll' ~ea.!llo.p~~.U1l0U OJ clvllrpr·oceedlngs. 100002312. 2008·1 . .

:... ,--' r Q,ifdil~"'~" ~!~~ ('-,....•..: \. "" n 'il . • ~J,..... ~ ~ ~




larg,e: >9 dwellings, and> 0 4ha

F"'"""""""I MedIum: >9 dwellings ,L-..JI and <O.4ha

""' ~ '::J I\. , This map is reproo.uc.!ld from Ordnance Survey mllllltiall with the permission of Ordnance Sl,Jrve~ Itn behalf of lhe Controller of He! ~(s Stationary Office ll:> Crown copyright Unauthorised reprodull1lon '-an infringement

~t :l~d may ~~d to p~~ulion 0; civil P~il!\lS- 1~~31'2, '2~:- ~:c .'X

~.


Housing Application s.tes


Large: >9 dwellings and::> O.4na

Medium: >9 dwellings[=:J and .::O.4ha


HOl:lsirng Application Sites

CJ Small: 8-9 dwellings

Large: >9 dWellings c::J and> O.4ha

Medium: >9 dwellings I II and <O.4ha

ERS 6

Local Authority Bout'ldary


c=::::J Small: 6-9 dwellings


Medium: >9 dwelllngs ,md <O.4ha50Q

This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey male/ial with the permission of Ordnance Scrvey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty·s Slationary Office () Crown copyright- Unauthorised reprodycti an infringement of Crown copyright and may load 10 prosecution or~vil P!~eedjn9s. 100002312.~ .

.'

LQcal Authorityc:::J undary

Housi'ng Application Sites



Medium: >9 dwe.llingsc=l and <O.4ha

TYM & RJJITNERS Fb;lI"I'3I#'I,j ~-,.""ITA'1 ~.

~

I' ANNEXA - waverley.gov.uk Arrick_Appendices.pdf · Assessment of Mole Valley District Council's...

Documents

Transcript of I' ANNEXA - waverley.gov.uk Arrick_Appendices.pdf · Assessment of Mole Valley District Council's...