hypothesis about the beginning of the universe
-
Upload
parth-jani -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of hypothesis about the beginning of the universe
-
8/3/2019 hypothesis about the beginning of the universe
1/3
Universe born
Many years ago, Scientists believe in god but after Jorge lemitre (1929) found a new and accep
theory used Einsteins relativity called BIG BANG this theory accept by all over the world not
scientists!
After that, many questions made from this theory so scientists not satisfied from this theory. M
other physicists believe on religious also, who accepted God. Many other physicists also try to
new idea like Jayant Narlikar and others but scientists believe only big bang and accept also. L
hadron collider which is biggest machine in this world, it using for find universe born but it also
on big bang theory.
I also not believe in big bang theory because here is also making many questions which theory
give answer like how exactly time was born, if there was cosmic egg then it also had dimensionageometry but there was no space then how dimensions born?
I try to found new idea idea is here:
We know about parallel universe, I suppose in parallel universe there was any black hole which
by stars death, as hawking into a black hole there are universes or empty space also, we can sup
there was any white hole in the place of big bangs cosmic egg, it had not any geo dimension
know energy cant destroy and cant born, I think energy, matter and other things of universe get
black hole black hole transform the matter form energy (as math E=mc^2). As Einsteins fab
suppose two parallel fabrics, in one of them (suppose a fabric) higher black hole which center ouniverse (give name black hole x) then black hole x has very high density on a fabric so, it made
hole, matter, energy, waves, particle and other things of universe get into black hole! If we rem
singularities then we realize time does not stop there.
As Stephen W Hawking there is any baby universe but might any empty space, I think in empty s
or no space black holes reason white hole made, which energy giant black hole collapse any m
wave, particle then other hand white hole reduce then matter- antimatter, wave, particle but in en
form. Then after our universe full of energy now, white hole reduce matter-antimatter form also, b
this time matter more then anti matter so which matter and anti matter met they were destroyedmatter is more then anti matter so some matter not destroyed and make our universe! Before m
white holes anti gravity made our universe large and as nature gravity. Strong force, week force
electro magnetic force made: our universe was large and four forces done their work to made
and more atoms, particle and matter! Hydrogen form and then after stars made (from nuclear fusi
-
8/3/2019 hypothesis about the beginning of the universe
2/3
Now the question is: if our universe made by another universe then howanother universe made? Here is answer:
Another universe made from Nothing! Time and Energy UncertaintyPrinciple: Can you get something from nothingness (empty space)? Actually
yes. Imagine a box. If you remove EVERY matter, forces and fields, and
energy you could think of, what will the box contain? Nothing? That may
sound logical for early philosophers and today's laypeople but it turns out
that quantum physics, which is confirmed by many observations, has a very
weird answer to this. Well there is no such thing as nothing in quantum
physics. Heisenberg's Time-Energy Uncertainty Principle states somethingvery weird. Now read this example: Imagine a box filled purely of empty
space. Now try to analyze the energy of a very small portion or volume of
the box over a period of time, and let's say our starting point is 1 second and
then do it again and this time in a smaller period of time and then do it again
and again in smaller and smaller period of time. The Time-Energy
Uncertainty Principle states that the shorter the time interval you measure in
-
8/3/2019 hypothesis about the beginning of the universe
3/3
a system, the more uncertain the amount of energy is, and the small volume
of the system you tried to analyze in the example just adds more uncertainty.
So at some point, the time interval you measure will be small enough so that
the energy in the system is uncertain enough that there is enough probability
that the system has small but non-zero energy. And sometimes this small but
non-zero energy will be enough to produce particle-antiparticle pairs literally
OUT OF NOTHING!!!!!!! As very small time intervals pass by, the energies
are large enough that particle-antiparticle pairs wink in-and-out of existence
all the time! Amazing! You CAN get something out of nothing! (Although
you can't necessarily get anything you want.)
By Parth Jani: parallel fabric idea by Parth R Jani
Nothingness idea given by Jacey Menzies Ong