HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

29
HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006

Transcript of HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Page 1: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

HYPERTEXTUALITY ANDPOP ART

Murat GungorHarjant Gill

October 3, 2006

Page 2: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Today…

• Role of the Reader– Text– Signs– Eco’s Perspective– Cultural Encyclopedia

• Pop Art– What is it?– Critiques and Proponents– Enablers of Pop Art– Pop Artists– Experiment: Putting Eco into Pop Art

Page 3: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Umberto Eco

• Born in 1932• Italian medievalist, philosopher and

novelist• Most famous works: The Name of the

Rose, Foucault’s Pendulum• Worked as a cultural editor for

Radiotelevisione Italiana (RAI)• His works illustrate postmodernist

literary theory concept of hypertextuality.

Page 4: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

On Text

• Text is a lazy machinery, which forces its possible readers to do the part of its textual work by its modalities of interpretive operations.

• In order to engage with a text: a pre-textual theory of signs is needed.

• Notions of linguistic signs must me addressed in such a way that the textual destiny of the sign is recognized: a junction between theory of signs and a theory of text can then be achieved.

• Text are the loci where signs are produced.

Page 5: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

On Signs

• Buyssens: Sign (and visual image) in itself becomes fully meaningful when inserted within the larger context…

• Larger Context: Simple word-processes in some way that certain features, which prescribes it textual fate. Signs cannot exist outside the context of the text.

• Theory of Signification should be the first theory of all a theory of signs.

• Dictionary/Production of new meaning: They make signs interact with each other in the light of their previous intertextual history.

• Text (possibility of new semantic kinship/production of new discourses) Vs Sign (forced unification and limiting of discourse).

• Kristeva: The Ideology of sign is coherent with the classic ideology of the knowing subject.

Page 6: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

For Eco

• Language is Homonymic: Eg. Bachelor, Smoke.

• Objecting to: Unified concept of sign… “Signs are conceived of as being intentionally emitted and conventionally coded, linked by a bi-conditional bond to their definition, subject to analysis and syntagmatically disposed according to a linear sequence.”

• Reconsider the history of signs: followed a different evolutionary pattern: one would realize that linguistical fixing of signs is recent phenomenon…

• Eco is critiquing the previous linguistic model and eliminate the notion of linguistic signs.

Page 7: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

What is Eco Proposing?• Need to understand how text is interpreted.

• Role of the reader: Active interpretation of the text, informed by subjectivity.

• Encyclopedia-like semantic representation: Semantico-pragmatic rules: establish how and under which conditions the addressee of a given text is entitled to collaborate in order to actualize what the text actually says.

• The sememe are visual texts: the text is expansion of the sememe.

• Encyclopedia Competence: Notion of cultural encyclopedia.

• Scripts or frames… would consider the standard sequences of actions that an interpreter needs to presuppose in order to work out a text and to render explicit information which is not expressed, or at least not apparent at the level of manifestation

Page 8: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

When Reading a Text

Maneuvering Coded Semantic Information

Negotiate Different Semes, Provided by the Sememes

Make Them Mutually React and Amalgamate

Page 9: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Eco Argues• Signs are the starting point of a process of interpretation

which leads to infinite series of progressive consequences

• Signs are open devices (Multi-Conditional)… Echo is deconstructing bi-conditionality of Signs.

• Textual interpretation SAME PRINCIPLE APPLIES Sign interpretation

Page 10: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Deduction and Induction vs. Abduction

• Principle feature of text is its ability to elicit abductions.

• Reader looks for a possible context capable of making initial expression intelligible and reasonable.

• Signs are not fixed/dead; they are continuously evolving their readings…de-constructing the notion of sign as definition or as synonymous.

• The reader plays an active role in textual interpretation.

Page 11: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Cultural EncyclopediaExchanges of Meaning

Cultural Memory

Cultural Dictionary (Pre-exists Individual User)

Memory Machines of Culture:Language, discourses, narratives and visual images

Media-Externalized Memory Machine:Privileging Ideology, Promoting Hegemony,

Hierarchy of Cultural Knowledge

Social Functions of Encyclopedia are Culturally Constructed

Page 12: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

In Conclusion

• Eco is trying to understand the epistemology of thinking and how meaning is produced.

• LITERARY TEXT FIELDS OF MEANING (rather than STINGS OF MEANING) OPEN, INTERNALLY DYNAMIC & PSYCHOLOGICALLY ENGAGED FIELDS.

• Eco is moving beyond intertextuality, to consider the reader as an active subject…leading to HYPERTETUALITY or INTER-CONNECTEDNESS of all texts.

• Meaning is manufactured by consciousness, and how it may be possible for human reading to be without the pursuit of, and sometimes-unconscious application of meaning…

Page 13: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Pop Art

“I love Los Angeles. I love Hollywood. They're beautiful. Everybody's plastic, but I love plastic. I want to be plastic.”

Page 14: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

What is Pop Art?

• Lawrence Alloway’s comments:– Masses doing art, not minorities– Democratization of art– Characteristic of industrial society– Accompany changes better– The rise of the audience

• Shift of focus from England to USA• Pop Art forms celebrating the urban culture

Page 15: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Critiques and Proponents

• Greenberg:– ‘Avant-garde and Kitsch’ essay (1939)– Avant-garde artist uninfluenced by commercial art– What is avant-garde?

Page 16: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Avant-Garde Art

• Definition of Avant-Garde• Paris Salon and Salon de Refusés• Progressive notion of art• Non-representational art

Édouard Manet (1832-1883), Luncheon on the Grass (Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe)

Page 17: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Critiques and Proponents

• Greenberg:– ‘Avant-garde and Kitsch’ essay (1939)– Avant-garde artist uninfluenced by commercial art– What is avant-garde?

• Lucy R. Lippard:– Unexpected outcome of a decade of Abstract Expressionism– Uncritical reflection of our environment can be a breath of

fresh air.– Branded Pop Art under abstraction

Page 18: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Where is Pop Art Coming From? - Enablers

AVANT-GARDE AVANT-GARDE ARTART

Impressionism

Divisionism.

.

.

Abstract Expressionism

POP ART

Socialist Realism

Cold WarCold War

Capitalism

Communism

Postmodernism

Page 19: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Pop Artists

• Lived in Manhattan and knew each other• Had experience in advertising• Used mass culture to create their segments

Page 20: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Lichtenstein

• Style: Used comics• Technique: Used projection and silkscreen

Brush Strokes (1964)

Page 21: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Pop Artists

• Lived in Manhattan and knew each other• Had experience in advertising• Used mass culture to create their segments

Page 22: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Rauschenberg

• Style: cords, mundane tarnished objects• Technique: Painting and sculptures

Dylaby (1962)

Page 23: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Pop Artists

• Lived in Manhattan and knew each other• Had experience in advertising• Used mass culture to create their segments

Page 24: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Warhol

• Style: Celebrities, repeated frames, tragedy• Technique: Silkscreen, mechanical

production: ‘Factory’

Campbell’s Soup Can 1 (1968)

Page 25: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Re-Cycling Pop Art: Putting Ecointo Pop Art

• How can the reader make sense of Pop Art today?

Trek Thunder Kelly

iPod Gharib - TortureiPod Gharib - Electrocution

Page 26: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Re-Cycling Pop Art: Putting Ecointo Pop Art

• How can the reader make sense of Pop Art today?

Trek Thunder Kelly

Suicide of Frida Kahlo

Devolution of Fool Bull

Geronimo’s Last Stand

The Instigator

Page 27: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Re-Cycling Pop Art: Putting Ecointo Pop Art

• How can the reader make sense of Pop Art today?

Trek Thunder Kelly

Clintonian Cigar Cereal KillerViagra Pills Ohs

Page 28: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Putting Eco into Pop Art

• How can the reader make sense of Pop Art?

Re-cycling Pop Art

Page 29: HYPERTEXTUALITY AND POP ART Murat Gungor Harjant Gill October 3, 2006.

Thank you