Hypernatraemic Dehydration Case Presentation Muhammad Zakariya SHO – MKGH 06/06/2012.
-
Upload
vernon-gallagher -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Hypernatraemic Dehydration Case Presentation Muhammad Zakariya SHO – MKGH 06/06/2012.
Hypernatraemic DehydrationHypernatraemic DehydrationCase PresentationCase Presentation
Muhammad ZakariyaMuhammad ZakariyaSHO – MKGHSHO – MKGH06/06/201206/06/2012
Baby VB - FemaleDOB: 22/5/2012
12.45 am
15 days old todayCMW Referral
Background
•Mother: 29 years; G2P2; House Wife•Father: 33 years; Product Engineer•Sibling: 4 years; Female•Parents not consanguineous•All in good health
Pregnancy
Uneventful12 wks and 20 wks scans NORMAL
Booking bloods NORMALNo GBS history
Birth
Full term – NVDGood APGAR
Bwt: 2559 grams (2nd – 9th centile)HC: 33cm (9th – 25th centile)
Came to hospital: 10.45 pm (21/5)Delivery: 12.45am )23/5)Discharged: 7am (23/5)
Hospital stay after delivery: 6 hours
Feeding:
Exclusively breast fedFirst feeding: 30 mins after birth
Successive feeding: Every 2 hours lasting for 1 hour
Follow up:
Seen by CMW on:•23/5 – day 0•27/5 – day 5 - Weight: 2.370 kg
(7.3% wt loss)•01/6 – day 10 – Weight: 2.040
(20% weight loss)
Follow up
Day 8 – no UOP for 18 hoursContacted LW
Advised to give waterPassed urine (0n 01/6/2012)
– after 24 hoursPrior to admission on 01/6 child had
passed urine twice in 24 hours
On admission:
Reason for referral: 20% wt lossAdmission weight in PAU: 2.028kg
(20.7% wt loss)Exclusively BF 2-3 hourly lasting for
1 hrNot opened bowels for 48 hrs
Passed urine twice during preceding 24 hours
On admission
No fever; no rash; no lethargy; not irritable;
Vitals on admission
T – 35.5HR – 120RR – 25
Sats – 100%CRT – 3 seconds
BP – not measurable
Clinical signs
Sunken fontanelsSignificantly reduced skin turgor
Cold peripheriesPoor perfusion
Sticky eyesKetotic smell from mouthGood sucking from bottle
Good tone
Clinical signs
Rest of the CVS and Respiratory examination unremarkable
Initial investigation
No urine available immediately for analysisBloods:
FBC - clotted
Na+: 189K+: 3.6Cl: 144HCO3: 17.9
Urea: 48.2Creatinine: 122
Initial investigation
FBC on day2
Hb – 18.5WBC – 17.4PLT – 341N – 11.8
Initial management
2 x 10ml/kg IV Bolus with 0.9% NaCl
Initiated oral feeds at 180 ml/kg/day of EBM+Formula orally
Made HDUPlan made for daily weight and 8
Hourly UENGT sited 12 hours after admission
due to poor sucking
Further Management
USS of kidneys on day 2 of admission:
Abnormal corticomedullary differentiation with hyperechogenic
areas on both kidneys; Some urine in bladder with debris in
it[ Consistent with ATN]
Day 2 progress
Large vomits on 3 hourly feedsPassed urine – 15 mls
Vitals – normalSkin turgor remained reduced
Serum Na+ - 174 mmol/L
Feeds made 1 ½ hourly (30mls)
Further progress
Weight:
day1 day2 day3 day4 day5 day62040
Further progress
Electrolytes:
Na+ 189 185 174 165 158 152
K+ 3.6 4.8 4.4 3.2 4.7 5.0
Ur 48.2 36.2 24.3 8.8 6.3
Cr 122 78 66 41 36
Follow Up
Due for
Repeat USS of kidneysMRI head
Both as out patient
Hypernatraemic Hypernatraemic dehydration in neonates dehydration in neonates
receiving inadequate receiving inadequate breastfeedingbreastfeeding
Introduction
Hypernatraemic dehydration is potentially a lethal condition
Associated with cerebral oedema, intracranial haemorrhage,
hydrocephalus, gangrene and DIC
Introduction
Normal neonatal feeding is usually on demand every 2–4 hours, with a minimum intake of 30 mL/feed over
a period of 5-20 minute
Introduction
It is normal over the first week of life for the neonate to lose as much as 5-7% of its birth weight through normal diuresis
Neonates should regain their birth weight by the tenth day of life
Adequate breast milk intake depends on:
normal mammogenesis (mammary development)normal lactogenesis (unimpeded initiation of Lactation)normal galactopoiesis (sustained ongoing milk synthesis)effective milk delivery to the infant.(effective milk removal)
Introduction
Many underlying factors can interfere with lactation and
breastfeeding, and thus contribute to inadequate breastfeeding
and complications, for example hypernatraemic dehydration
Introduction
HND is more common nowbecause of early infant hospital
discharge withoutadequate follow-up
Cooper WO, Atherton HD, Kahana M, KotagalUR. Increased incidence of severe breast feedingmalnutrition and hypernatremia in a metropolitan
area. Pediatrics 1995;96(5 Pt 1):957– 60.
Aetiology
Commonest causeof hypernatraemic dehydration is
low volume intakeof breast milk
Aetiology
The infant becomes dehydratedwhile the kidneys are mature
enough to retain sodiumions.
Water loss occurs predominantly through the skin
and from the lungs.
Aetieology
Unusually high sodium content of maternal breast milkMay be contributing
Aetiology
The sodium content of breast milkat birth is high and declines rapidly
over the subsequentdays.
Aetiology
Na+ Content of MilkColostrum in the first five days (22±12) mmol/L
Transitional milk from day five to ten (13±3) mmol/L
Mature milk after 15 d is (7±2) mol/L
Aetiology
Women who failed to establishgood breast-feeding did not
experience the normalphysiological drop in breast milk
sodium concentrationcompared to those who had little
difficulty in establishinga good milk flow.
Clinical Presentation
usually around ten days (range : from 3 to 21 d)Symptoms may include:
Reduced UOPReduced bowel motion
Signs may be non-specific, including lethargy and irritability
Clinical Presentation
usual physical signs of dehydration may be unreliable in
neonates
Clinical Presentation
Infants with 10% (100 ml/kg) dehydration may have:
sunken eyes and fontanel,cold and clammy skin,
poor skin turgor and oliguria
Clinical Presentation
Infants with 15% (150ml/kg)dehydration would have signs of
shock (hypotension, tachycardia and weak
pulses) In addition to the above features.
Clinical Presentation
Look for:•Sunken anterior fontanelle •Sunken eyeballs•Lethargic appearance•Dry mucous membranes•Decreased skin turgor ;Doughy skin•Prolonged capillary refill
Clinical Presentation
fullness of the anterior fontanelle may disguise the underlying
dehydration due to cerebral oedema in some cases
Investigations
Serum biochemistry: Serum sodium and plasma
osmolarity would be helpful in theassessment of the hydration
status in an infant
Investigations
Hyponatremia with weight loss suggests sodium
depletion and would merit sodium replacement
Investigations
Hyponatremia with weight gain suggests
water excess and necessitates fluid restriction
Investigations
Hypernatremia with weight loss
suggests dehydration
and would require fluid correction over 48 hours
Investigations
Hypernatremia with weightgain suggests salt and water load
and would be an indication of fluid and sodium
restriction.
Investigations
URINE:Acceptable ranges:
urine output : 1-3 ml/kg/hrspecific gravity: 1.005 - 1.012Osmolarity: 100-400 mosm/L.
Investigations
Blood gas: Not needed routinely for fluid
managementUseful in the acid base
management of patients with poor tissue perfusion and shock
Hypo-perfusion is associated with metabolic acidosis
Investigations
Fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa):
FeNa is an indicator of normal tubular function
(but is of limited value in preterm infants due to developmental tubular
immaturity)
Investigations
Blood Urea and creatinine – good indicators of renal failure
Morbidity and MortalityMorbidity and Mortality
•Apnoeas and bradycardias•Seizures, Facial palsy•Multiple cerebral infacrtions (EEG)•Hypertension, DIC•NEC•Amputation of leg after iliac artery thrombosis•Death
Morbidity and MortalityMorbidity and Mortality
The brain damage may be caused by
•cerebral oedema•intracranial haemorrhages•haemorrhagic infarcts•and thromboses
Morbidity and MortalityMorbidity and Mortality2 examples2 examples
1. Nine days of ageplasma sodium of 191 mmol/Lsuffered seizures, massive intraventricular haemorrhage, multiple dural thromboses and died on day 12.
Morbidity and MortalityMorbidity and Mortality2 examples2 examples
2. Day 13 plasma sodium concentration of 180 mmol/LCT scan: multiple areas of intraventricular, periventricular, and cortical haemorrhage. died on day 16
Morbidity and MortalityMorbidity and Mortality
Some complications, especially seizures, occur
most frequently during treatment
Treatment
mainstay of treatment is to rehydrate
the child very slowly
Treatment
If the child appears well,
Slow rehydration at a rate of 100ml/kg/day can be carried
out using expressed breast milk or proprietary milk or acombination of both.
Treatment
If the child is unwell then rehydration should be
carried out intravenously
Treatment
Infants rehydrated at a rate of 150ml/kg/day were more likely
to develop convulsions and peripheral oedema than the
infants whose fluid intake was restricted to 100 ml/kg/day
Treatment
•A collapsed child:20 mL/kg of colloid or 0.9 %
saline infused over half an hour. •If the child is not in shock,
then rehydration may be commenced intravenously using 0.9 % saline at 100 mL·kg-1·d-1
Conclusion
HND is a preventable condition in most cases:
breast feeding problems are the main risk factors in
NHD incidence and some of them can be diagnosed and
corrected before or after parturition
Conclusion
. To prevent NHD inneonates, continuing weight watch
and monitoring thenumber of urination per day are
strongly recommended
Conclusion
Women should be educated about the signs and
symptoms of dehydration during prenatal visits and
again before discharge after delivery.
Conclusion
Early dischargedemands early follow-up to detect
breastfeedingproblems before the onset of serious and sometimes life-
threatening dehydration.
References1 Kaplan JA, Siegler RW, Schmunk GA. Fatal hypernatremicdehydration in exclusively breast-fed newborn infants due tomaternal lactation failure. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19: 19-22.2 Chambers TL, Steel AE. Concentrated milk feeds and theirrelation to hypernatraemic dehydration in infants. Arch DisChild 1975; 50: 610-5.3 Clarke TA, Markarian M, Griswold W, Mendoza S.Hypernatremic dehydration resulting from inadequate breastfeeding.Pediatrics 1979; 63: 931-2.4 Rowland TW, Zori RT, Lafleur WR, Reiter EO. Malnutritionand hypernatremic dehydration in breast-fed infants.JAMA 1982; 247: 1016-7.5 Thullen JD. Management of hypernatremic dehydration dueto insufficient lactation. Clin Pediatr 1988; 27: 370-2.6 Jaffe KM, Kraemer MJ, Robison MC. Hypernatremia inbreast-fed newborns. West J Med 1981; 135: 54-5.7 Roddey OF Jr, Martin ES, Swetenburg RL. Critical weightloss and malnutrition in breast-fed infants. Am J Dis Child1981; 135: 597-9
References.8 Marino R, Gourji S, Rosenfeld W. Neonatal metaboliccasebook. Hypernatremia and breast feeding. J Perinatol1989; 9: 451-3.9 Ng PC, Chan HB, Fok TF, Lee CH, Chan KM, Wong W, etal. Early onset of hypernatraemic dehydration and fever inexclusively breast-fed infants. J Paediatr Child Health 1999;35: 585-7.10 Oddie S, Richmond S, Coulthard M. Hypernatraemic dehydrationand breast feeding: a population study. Arch DisChild 2001; 85: 318-20.11 Livingstone VH, Willis CE, Abdel-Wareth LO, Thiessen P,Lockitch G. Neonatal hypernatremic dehydration associatedwith breast-feeding malnutrition: a retrospective survey. CanMed Assoc J 2000; 162: 647-52.12 Cooper WO, Atherton HD, Kahana M, Kotagal UR. Increasedincidence of severe breastfeeding malnutrition andhypernatremia in a metropolitan area. Pediatrics 1995; 96:957-60.
References13 van der Heide PA, Toet MC, Diemen-Steenvoorde JA,Renardel de Lavalette PA, de Jonge GA. Hypertonic dehydrationin “silent” malnutrition of breast-fed infants. NedTijdschr Geneeskd 1998; 142: 993-5.14 Paul AC, Ranjini K, Muthulakshmi, Roy A, Kirubakaran C.Malnutrition and hypernatraemia in breastfed babies. AnnTrop Paediatr 2000; 20: 179-83.15 Harding D, Cairns P, Gupta S, Cowan F. Hypernatraemia:why bother weighing breast fed babies? Arch Dis Child FetalNeonatal Ed 2001; 85: F145.16 Chaudhary R, Twaddle S, Levi R, Haque K. Hypernatremicdehydration in breast-fed infants. Paediatr Today 1998; 6:85-7.17 Pickel S, Anderson C, Holliday MA. Thirsting and hypernatremicdehydration — a form of child abuse. Pediatrics1970; 45: 54-9.18 Banister A, Matin-Siddiqi SA, Hatcher GW. Treatment ofhypernatraemic dehydration in infancy. Arch Dis Child 1975;50: 179-86.