HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF...

10
Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol.47, No. 3, 348-357. 1999. HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO LANGELLA,2 PIERGIULIO CAPPELLETTI, 1 AND CARMINE COLELLA3 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra dell'Universit~t Federico II, Via Mezzocannone 8, 80134 Napoli, Italy 2 Universit~ del Sannio, Via Caio Ponzio Telesino, 11, 82100, Benevento, Italy 3 Dipartimento d'Ingegneria dei Materiali e della Produzione dell'Universitfi Federico II, Piazzale V. Tecchio 80, 80125, Napoli, Italy Abstract--Experiments on zeolitization were conducted on four synthetic monocationic glasses (Na, K, Ca, or Mg-rich glass) with Si/A1 molar ratios of 2.67, similar in acidity to many volcanic glasses of partially zeolitized Italian tufts. The products of the hydrothermal treatment at 100, 150, and 200~ of single glasses or glass mixtures with deionized H20 or monosaline solutions (NaC1, KC1, CaC12) were characterized by X-ray diffraction, thermal, microscopic and chemical analyses. Chemical analyses of mother liquors were also performed. Mineral assemblages, containing chabazite, phillipsite, analcime, and K-feldspar, very similar to those found in altered, volcaniclastic alkali-trachytic or trachytic glass deposits were produced. Potassium was essential to chabazite and phillipsite crystallization, although phillipsite was obtained also in Ca-Na mixed systems. Sodium was necessary for analcime formation. Calcium plays only a secondary role in zeolitization, and magnesium does not favor zeolite crystallization but promotes the formation of smectite. Glass composition determines the mineral assemblages obtained and hence in those commonly found in nature. Key Words Analcime, Chabazite, Glass-to-Zeolite Conversion, Phillipsite, Synthesis, Trachytic Glasses, Zeolite Synthesis. INTRODUCTION Zeolites of pyroclastic and epiclastic deposits gen- erally form by the action of natural fluids on volcanic glass. Usually the type and chemical composition of resultant zeolites are strongly dependent on the chem- ical composition of the starting material, although oth- er physical and chemical factors may play a prominent role in the thermodynamics and kinetics of zeolite for- mation. For example, different zeolites, often with similar chemical composition, may arise from the same starting material, as is illustrated by the Neapol- itan Yellow Tuff, occurring in outcrops in the Naples volcanic district as far as the northernmost area of the Phlegraean Fields (Scarpati et al., 1993; Orsi et al., 1995). This tuff is part of a huge volcaniclastic deposit emplaced -12 Ka ago. The upper, unlithified part of this formation is called "pozzolana" and consists of glass shards with an alkali-trachytic composition with a slight trachytic to latitic trend from the bottom to the top (Di Girolamo et at., 1984; Orsi et at., 1995). The zeolitization of this glassy precursor by the action of fluids, in a genetic environment linked to the erup- tive mechanism (de' Gennaro et al., 1995), gave rise to phillipsite, subordinate chabazite and, in some cas- es, analcime (de' Gennaro et al., 1982a, 1987a). The former two zeolites show a very similar chemical composition, except for small differences in exchange- able cations (de' Gennaro and Langella, 1996). The physico-chemical factors controlling crystalli- zation of phillipsite and chabazite remain unresolved. The problem was previously approached using exper- iments simulating the hydrothermal conversion of nat- ural trachytic glass in deionized H20 (de' Gennaro et al., 1988), which gave rise to zeolite crystallization at or below 200~ A gel-like phase formed as an inter- mediate stage of conversion, although zeolite appar- ently nucleated from the liquid phase. The synthesized authigenic phases were phillipsite, analcime and feld- spar, and the most important parameters affecting zeo- litization appeared to be the cationic composition, the alkalinity, and temperature (de' Gennaro and Colella, 1991; de' Gennaro et al., 1992). Further studies in- vestigated the reaction of the same glass with seawater (de' Gennaro et al., 1993). In this study, phyllosilicates (smectite and illite) were synthesized, depending on the Mg available in solution, along with the expected framework silicates (phillipsite, analcime, and feld- spar). The overall similarity of the phase assemblages in the different experiments demonstrates the domi- nant role played by the chemistry of the starting glass. Ghiara and Petti (1996) confirmed previous observa- tions, as well as the formation of an "amorphous lay- er" where A1, Ca, and Mg ions are partially absorbed on the surface of the reacting glass. The influence of the type of hydrologic system (open vs. closed) de- veloped in the Neapolitan yellow tuff was also con- sidered by Passaglia and Vezzalini (1985) and by Car- nevali et at. (1994). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations showed that phillipsite crystalli- zation often preceded chabazite, although a later for- mation of phillipsite could not be excluded in some cases (Scherillo and Scherillo, 1990; de' Gennaro and Langella, 1996). Copyright 1999, The Clay Minerals Society 348

Transcript of HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF...

Page 1: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 47, No. 3, 348-357. 1999.

H Y D R O T H E R M A L C O N V E R S I O N OF T R A C H Y T I C GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. M O N O C A T I O N I C M O D E L GLASSES

MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO LANGELLA, 2 PIERGIULIO CAPPELLETTI, 1 AND CARMINE COLELLA 3

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra dell'Universit~t Federico II, Via Mezzocannone 8, 80134 Napoli, Italy 2 Universit~ del Sannio, Via Caio Ponzio Telesino, 11, 82100, Benevento, Italy

3 Dipartimento d'Ingegneria dei Materiali e della Produzione dell'Universitfi Federico II, Piazzale V. Tecchio 80, 80125, Napoli, Italy

Abstract--Experiments on zeolitization were conducted on four synthetic monocationic glasses (Na, K, Ca, or Mg-rich glass) with Si/A1 molar ratios of 2.67, similar in acidity to many volcanic glasses of partially zeolitized Italian tufts. The products of the hydrothermal treatment at 100, 150, and 200~ of single glasses or glass mixtures with deionized H20 or monosaline solutions (NaC1, KC1, CaC12) were characterized by X-ray diffraction, thermal, microscopic and chemical analyses. Chemical analyses of mother liquors were also performed. Mineral assemblages, containing chabazite, phillipsite, analcime, and K-feldspar, very similar to those found in altered, volcaniclastic alkali-trachytic or trachytic glass deposits were produced. Potassium was essential to chabazite and phillipsite crystallization, although phillipsite was obtained also in Ca-Na mixed systems. Sodium was necessary for analcime formation. Calcium plays only a secondary role in zeolitization, and magnesium does not favor zeolite crystallization but promotes the formation of smectite. Glass composition determines the mineral assemblages obtained and hence in those commonly found in nature.

Key Words Analcime, Chabazite, Glass-to-Zeolite Conversion, Phillipsite, Synthesis, Trachytic Glasses, Zeolite Synthesis.

I N T R O D U C T I O N

Zeoli tes of pyroclastic and epiclastic deposits gen- erally form by the action of natural fluids on volcanic glass. Usual ly the type and chemical composi t ion o f resultant zeoli tes are strongly dependent on the chem- ical composi t ion of the starting material, al though oth- er physical and chemical factors may play a prominent role in the thermodynamics and kinetics of zeoli te for- mation. For example, different zeolites, often with similar chemical composi t ion, may arise f rom the same starting material, as is illustrated by the Neapol- itan Yellow Tuff, occurring in outcrops in the Naples volcanic district as far as the nor thernmost area of the Phlegraean Fields (Scarpati e t a l . , 1993; Orsi e t a l . ,

1995). This tuff is part of a huge volcaniclast ic deposi t emplaced - 1 2 Ka ago. The upper, unli thified part of this format ion is cal led " p o z z o l a n a " and consists of glass shards with an alkali-trachytic composi t ion with a slight trachytic to latitic trend f rom the bot tom to the top (Di Gi ro lamo e t a t . , 1984; Orsi e t a t . , 1995). The zeoli t izat ion of this glassy precursor by the action of fluids, in a genetic envi ronment l inked to the erup- t ive mechan i sm (de' Gennaro e t a l . , 1995), gave rise to phillipsite, subordinate chabazite and, in some cas- es, analcime (de' Gennaro e t a l . , 1982a, 1987a). The former two zeoli tes show a very similar chemica l composi t ion, except for small differences in exchange- able cations (de ' Gennaro and Langella , 1996).

The phys ico-chemica l factors control l ing crystall i- zation of phillipsite and chabazite remain unresolved. The p rob lem was previous ly approached using exper-

iments s imulat ing the hydrothermal convers ion o f nat- ural trachytic glass in deionized H20 (de ' Gennaro e t

a l . , 1988), which gave rise to zeoli te crystal l izat ion at or below 200~ A gel- l ike phase formed as an inter- mediate stage of conversion, al though zeoli te appar- ently nucleated f rom the l iquid phase. The synthesized authigenic phases were phillipsite, analcime and feld- spar, and the most important parameters affect ing zeo- l i t ization appeared to be the cationic composi t ion, the alkalinity, and temperature (de ' Gennaro and Colella, 1991; de ' Gennaro e t a l . , 1992). Further studies in- vest igated the reaction of the same glass with seawater (de ' Gennaro e t a l . , 1993). In this study, phyllosi l icates (smectite and illite) were synthesized, depending on the Mg available in solution, along with the expected f ramework silicates (phillipsite, analcime, and feld- spar). The overal l similari ty of the phase assemblages in the different exper iments demonstrates the domi- nant role p layed by the chemis t ry of the starting glass. Ghiara and Petti (1996) conf i rmed previous observa- tions, as well as the formation o f an "amorphous lay- e r" where A1, Ca, and Mg ions are part ial ly absorbed on the surface of the reacting glass. The influence o f the type of hydrologic system (open vs . closed) de- ve loped in the Neapol i tan ye l low tuff was also con- sidered by Passaglia and Vezzalini (1985) and by Car- nevali e t at . (1994). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observat ions showed that phil l ipsite crystal l i - zation often preceded chabazite, al though a later for- mat ion of phil l ipsite could not be excluded in some cases (Scheri l lo and Scheril lo, 1990; de ' Gennaro and Langella, 1996).

Copyright �9 1999, The Clay Minerals Society 348

Page 2: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

Vol. 47, No. 3, 1999 Hydrothermal conversion of trachytic glass into zeolite 349

Table 1. Chemical analyses of natural and synthetic glasses (reactant) and of synthesized phases (products) as wt. %.

SiO 2 A120:~ FeO MgO CaO Na20 K20 Si/AI ~CzJA12

Reactant Natural glass I 56.61 17.98 2.82 1.88 4.37 4.03 7.23 2.67 1.51 Na-glass 62.07 19.77 - - - - - - 18.15 - - 2.67 1.51 K-glass 56.20 17.90 - - - - - - 0.68 24.90 2.67 1.513 Ca-glass 62.28 19.85 - - 16.42 0.27 0.12 2.67 1.514 Mg-glass 64.88 20.67 - - 12.23 0.60 0.13 2.67 1.515

SiO 2 A120 ~ FeO MgO CaO Na20 K20 Si/AI E% 7

Product 6 Na-P18 (Na-glass + H20) 55.78 18.60 0.06 Ana8 (Na-glass + H20) 61.37 19.23 0.07 Ana 8 (Na-glass + Ca soln.) 60.80 19.07 0.02 Cha 6 (K-glass + Na soln.) 45.23 18.60 0.10 Cha15 (Na-glass + K-glass + H20) 47.42 18.25 0.02 Phit2 (K-glass + Na soln.) 50.24 18.41 0.04 Phil5 (Na-glass + K-glass + H20) 52.73 17.23 b.d.1. Phi6 (Ca-glass + Na soln.) 55.08 18.60 0.33 Phi 6 (Ca-glass + Na soln.) 54.60 18.50 0.11

0.07 0.04 10.50 0.14 2.54 5.26 0.16 0.02 11.13 0.03 2.71 2.38 0.09 0.04 11.26 0.05 2.71 1.02 0.16 0.89 1.32 14.88 2.06 -8 .32 0.32 1.12 1.97 11.06 2.20 1.07 0.16 0.42 1.44 15.13 2.31 -7.51 0.13 0.48 2.90 10.23 2.20 1.09 0.51 8.82 2.05 0.13 2.51 -10 .77 0.24 0.06 11.25 0.31 2.50 -5.41

Subscript for synthesized phases is reaction time in days. 1 Data from de' Gennaro et al., 1988. 2 C: alkaline or alkaline-earth cation; Zc: valence of C. 3 1.57, including the Na20 impurity. 4 1.54, including the Na20 and K20 impurities. 5 1.56, including the K20 impurity. 6 Symbols as in Figures 1 and 2. 7 Percent balance error, 100[1 - (Na + K + 2Ca + 2Mg)/A1].

The presen t s tudy examines more c lose ly the role o f cat ions , e i ther in the p recursor glass or in the con- tact solut ion, in the t r ans fo rma t ion of t rachyt ic glass into phase a s semblages charac ter i s t ic o f Neapo l i t an ye l low tuff and o ther I ta l ian tuf ts (phil l ipsi te , chaba- zite, and/or analc ime) .

M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S

Four glasses were p repa red at the " S t a z i o n e Speri- men t a l e del Vetro di M u r a n o (Ven ice ) " , h a v i n g a chemica l compos i t i on of a typical a lka l i - t rachyt ic p u m i c e f rom the Ph leg raean Fields where Si/A1 = 2.67, ~Czo = 1.51, in w h i c h C is a ca t ion and zo is its va l ence (de ' Genna r o et al., 1988; 1993), and each glass con t a ined on ly one me ta l ion of Na, K, Ca, or Mg, apar t f r om impuri t ies . Table 1 repor ts the chem- ical compos i t i ons of these glasses, re fe r red to as Na- glass, K-glass , Ca-glass , and Mg-g lass , c o m p a r e d wi th that of the na tura l p u m i c e f rom the As t ron i vo lcano in the Ph leg raean Fields.

H y d r o t h e r m a l reac t ions were p e r f o r m e d in 40 ml Tef lon- l ined s ta inless-s teel con ta iners us ing 1 g of p o w d e r e d glass (grain size < 1 0 txm). The fo l lowing expe r imen ta l condi t ions were employed : reac t ion tem- perature: 100, 150, or 200~ reac t ion t ime: 6 h to 38 d; so l id- to- l iquid ratio: 1/10; contac t solut ion: de ion- ized H 2 0 or 0.05 M NaC1, KC1, CaC12, or MgC12 so- lutions. S o m e tests were p e r f o r m e d by m i x i n g two dif- fe rent g lasses (Na-K, Na-Ca, K-Ca) in the p ropor t ions o f 1/3, 1/1, or 3/1. E xpe r i m en t s were p e r f o r m e d at

au togenous wa te r -vapor pressure (100~ = 101.3 kPa; 150~ = 475.9 kPa; 200~ = 1539.1 kPa) wi thou t st irr ing.

Reac t ions were in te r rup ted at p r e d e t e r m i n e d t imes and the con ta iners opened whi le still hot. To p reven t AI(OH)3 precipi ta t ion, an a l iquot of so lu t ion was sam- p led and acidif ied wi th HC1; solids were separa ted f r o m the r e m a i n i n g l iquids by gooch filters, w a s h e d wi th de ion ized H20, and dr ied ove rn igh t at 80~ Sol- ids were cha rac te r i zed by X- ray d i f f rac t ion (Phi l ips P W 1730-3710) , t he rma l analys is (mul t ip le t h e r m o a n - a lyzer Ne t z sch STA 409), and scann ing e lec t ron mi- c roscopy ( S E M ) ( C a m b r i d g e 250 TP). W h e n e v e r pos- sible, chemica l ana lyses of the syn thes ized p roduc t s we re p e r f o r m e d us ing a L i n k A N 10000 m i c r o a n a l y z e r sys tem. Ca t ions in solut ions were ana lyzed by a tomic a b s o r p t i o n s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t r y ( P e r k i n - E l m e r 2 1 0 0 ) and si l ica was ana lyzed by co lo r ime t ry ( S e c o m a n 500).

R E S U L T S

Reactions o f single glasses with deionized 1420

Figures 1 and 2 s u m m a r i z e the resul ts of the hydro- t he rma l conve r s ions in H20 of Na-g lass and K-glass , respect ively , as a func t ion of t empera tu re and reac t ion t ime. L ines in the f igures rough ly b o u n d the crys ta l - l iza t ion doma ins of s ingle phases or phase a s semblag - es. S imi la r expe r imen t s were p e r f o r m e d wi th Ca-g lass and Mg-g lass , bu t in the f o r m e r case no zeol i te c rys- ta l l iza t ion occurred, and in the lat ter on ly fo rma t ion of

Page 3: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

350 de' Gennaro, Langella, Cappelletti, and Colella Clays' and Clay Minerals

200

?

~ 150

100

~ a

Ana

"'. Ana + Fe " " , , ,.

2 4 6 g 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time, days

Figure 1. Crystallization sequences for the Na-glass H20 system as a function of temperature and reaction time. Am: no crystallization; Na-PI: gismondine-like zeolite; Ana: anal- cime; Fel: feldspar.

smectite was obtained after a three w e e k long exper- iment at 200~ These figures clearly show the influ- ence of temperature and t ime on the reaction o f glass. The most stable phases (analcime and feldspar) crys- tallized early at higher temperatures and appeared after longer reaction t imes at l ow temperatures. In the early stages of reaction, the sodic system produced Na-P1, a zeol i te having no natural counterpart (Baerlocher and Meier, 1972). During the reaction, analc ime formed and became the dominant phase, along with feldspar for the longest reaction t imes (Figure 1). Reactions o f K-glass with H20 produced chabazite at short reaction t imes, wh ich transformed with t ime into phil l ipsite +

200

~ 150

100

(Cha) + Phi + Ad \ " ' ~ Cha x (Cha) + Phi + Ad

0 2 4 6 8 ~0 12 14 16 l g 20 22 24

Time, days

Figure 2. Crystallization sequences for the K-glass-H20 system as a function of temperature and reaction time. Am: no crystallization; Cha: chabazite; Phi: phillipsite; Ad: adu- laria. Parentheses indicate a small quantity of phase.

adularia (Figure 2). Long-duration experiments at 200~ produced poss ible crystal l ization of a K-rich analcime, identif ied in part by its l o w water content (2.8%), compared to the Na-rich analogue ( > 8 % ) (Barrer and Hinds, 1953).

Figures 3 and 4 summarize the results of the chem- ical analyses o f the mother liquors for reactions with H 2 0 at 200~ and 150~ respectively. The pH trends for solutions in contact with Na-glass and K-glass are very similar at both temperatures (Figures 3a and 4a). The highest values were consistently obtained in the first stages o f reaction, and coincide with the begin- ning of crystall ization because o f the dissolution o f the

a 14.

12.

10

8

z=,

7,

--x- Na - ~ K -N-Ca I

~ M g

6 9 12 15 18 21 Time, days

b

"E

E

--~,- Na -O-K

4 -Et- Ca

- ~ M ~ 2

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21

Time, days

C 1.co ]

0~o.

E E o.~o

d .~, 0.50 <

0.40

c~30

02o

030

cr

- N - C a [ " ~ Mg

3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Time, days

d

f o S

I I tl

0 0

-o - -g --N-- Ca

. ~ M g

15 ig ~1 Time, days

Figure 3. Concentration trends of pH, SiO2, A1203, and alkaline and alkaline-earth cations in the mother liquors as a function of time for four glasses reacted with H20 at 200~

Page 4: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

Vol. 47, No. 3, 1999 Hydrothermal conversion of trachytic glass into zeolite 351

b 16

i--~-- Mg I

3 6 9 12 15 18 21 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 T i m e , days T i m e , d a y s

C 1,00 d

25 ~80

0,7O 20

a60

i"tN-Ca ! 10 a30. ~M~! -e-c,

M~,

am - --- ~ [] ~ - 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 3 6 9 12 15 iS 21

T i m e , d a y s T i m e , days

Figure 4. Concentration trends of pH, SIO2, A1203, and alkaline and alkaline-earth cations in the mother liquors as a function of time for four glasses reacted with H20, at 150~

most reactive surface layers (Figures 1 and 2). Exper- iments with Ca-glass produced lower pH values, which increased very slowly to pH --11. Mg-glass tended to generate octahedrally coordinated layers, re- suiting in a continuous pH decrease, in agreement with the results of previous investigations on the interaction between natural trachytic or shoshonitic glasses and seawater (de' Gennaro and Colella, 1992; de' Gennaro et al., 1993; Ghiara and Petti, 1996). Consistent with the pH trends, SiO2 content rapidly reached the highest values in the first stages of reaction of Na-glass and K-glass at 200~ (Figure 3b), whereas it constantly increased at 150~ (Figure 4b). SiO2 content slightly decreased for experiments starting from Ca-glass at 200~ whereas for Mg-glass SiO2 content remained nearly constant. The same experiments at 150~ showed, for both glasses, a slight increase in SiO2 con- tent followed by a decrease in the latter half of the experiment. The A1203 concentration was typically variable, but always very low if compared with other cations, and it decreased as a function of time (Figures 3c and 4c). However, data from the literature for A1203 are rather controversial, suggesting that different tem- perature or cooling rate of the solution can remarkably affect its evolution (de' Gennaro et al., 1993). Na and K concentrations quickly reached and maintained high

values in the relevant (Na, K) systems (Figures 3d and 4d), and Ca and Mg concentrations remained low.

Reactions o f single glasses with heteroionic solutions

The results of glass-to-zeolite conversions at 150~ in the presence of heteroionic solutions, i.e., reactions with 0.05 M solutions containing a cation other than that present in the glass, are summarized in Figure 5. Experiments with aqueous Mg were not performed for two reasons. First, the presence of this ion in solution causes a pH reduction during the first stage of reaction with trachytic glasses upon crystallization of a Mg- smectite (stevensite) (de' Gennaro et al., 1993). Sec- ond, interaction with Na- or K-glass causes a pH in- crease which greatly reduces the solubility of Mg(OH)2.

A general feature of these systems, with a few ex- ceptions, is the reduction of the induction time, com- pared with the analogous experiments in H20 (Figures 1 and 2). Phillipsite crystallizes in most systems, whereas chabazite forms in K-bearing systems and, contrasting with what occurs in natural systems, al- ways precedes phillipsite crystallization.

A limited number of analyses of the mother liquors were performed (Figure 6). The most striking feature is that the cation concentration of the starting alkaline

Page 5: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

352 de' Gennaro, Langella, Cappelletti, and Colella Clays and Clay Minerals

Ca"

K

b

Ca-

~Na-glass

Na.

Am N N ~ ' ' ~ P h i + A ~ All''"

K - g l a s s

Am I Cha t Phi + Cha

Cha Phi + Cha Phi + Cha +K-Fel

C

K

Na

[Ca-glass

Am I (Cha)

1 (Cha)

Cha + Phi

Phi + Cha Phi

) 4 ; 8 i0 ]2 14 {6 18 20 �89 �89 Time, days

Figure 5. Phase assemblages as a function of time in different glass-monosal ine solution systems at 150~ Cation originally present in solution is given on the Y-axis; symbols as in Figures 1 and 2.

a so

~0 -6 E t5

b 45

35

30

+Na+ KCl ~

Z 15

3 6 9 12 15 18 2I Time, days

-l[,- Na * CICI2 .--~ K + NaCl i

6 9 12 15 18 21 Time, days

C 4

3

1

~s

0

10

'.-m- Na + daCl2 i

-.-G;2cS-I i ~ Na + CaeI2 --I~ K + Nael

6 9 12 15 18 2I 3 6 9 12 15 Ig Time, days Time, days

Figure 6. Concentration trends of pH, Na, K, and Ca in the mother liquors as a function of time for Na-, K-, Ca-glasses reacted with heteroionic solutions water, at 150~

Page 6: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

Vol. 47, No. 3, 1999 Hydrothermal conversion of trachytic glass into zeolite 353

Table 2. Crystallization products in mixed-glass-H20 sys- tems at 150~ 1

Glass Glass system ratio Time: 8 d Time: 15 d Time: 21 d

Na-K 1/3 Am Cha > Phi Cha > Phi 1/1 Am Phi ~ Cha Phi ~ Cha 3/1 Am Phi > Cha Phi > Cha

Na-Ca 1/3 Am Phi Phi 1 / 1 Am Phi Phi 3/1 Am Phi Phi

K-Ca 1/3 Am Cha >> Phi Cha >> Phi 1/1 Am Cha >> Phi Cha >> Phi 3/1 Am Cha >> Phi Cha >> Phi

Symbols as in Figure 2.

Table 3. Concentrations of the main species in mother li- quors of mixed glass-H20 systems after 15 days of reaction at 150~

Glass Glass system ratio S i t 2, mmol Na, mmol K, tmnol Ca, mmol

Na-K 1/3 6.40 5.52 6.91 - - 1/1 5.81 6.52 2.94 - - 3/1 7.64 8.70 3.71 - -

Na-Ca 1/3 0.95 5.44 - - 0.027 1/1 1.74 19.75 - - 0.008 3/1 2.95 27.62 - - 0.011

K-Ca 1/3 0.90 - - 1.25 0.019 1/1 2.41 - - 2.63 0.013 3/1 2.58 - - 4.60 0.015

solutions was greatly reduced fo l lowing the beginning of the interaction. Some specific results for selected systems are described.

Na-glass-KCl solution. Chabazi te and then phil l ipsite crystal l izat ion began on the eighth day (Figure 5a). The aqueous K concentrat ion decreased during the first 10 days (Figure 6a), and the aqueous Na concentrat ion increased until the fifteenth day, when abundant anal- c ime formed (Figures 6b and 5a). With the except ion o f lower starting values, the pH trend was similar to that observed in the Na-g l a s s -H20 system (Figure 6d).

Na-glass-CaCl 2 solution. The aqueous Na concentra- t ion progress ively increased (Figure 6b), whereas the Ca concentrat ion decreased to very low values after the second day of reaction (Figure 6c), in response to the crystal l izat ion of Na-P1, analcime, and for longer times, K-feldspar (Figure 5a). The pH value after two days was near 13 (Figure 6d).

K-glass-NaCl solution. A rapid increase of K until the sixth day of react ion was fo l lowed by near constant values (Figure 6a). Na values also decreased to the sixth day and then remained constant (Figure 6b). Chabazi te crystal l izat ion occurred after about three days and was fo l lowed by phill ipsite format ion after eight days of react ion (Figure 5b). The pH trend was similar to that observed in the K-g l a s s -H20 system (Figure 6d).

Ca-glass-NaCl solution. Na values slightly decreased up to the sixth day and then remained constant (Figure 6b). The aqueous Ca concentrat ion ranged be tween 0 . 5 0 - 4 mmol . The highest pH value recorded was 9.5 (Figure 6d). Chabazi te was the first phase to crystal- lize, in low amounts, fo l lowed after six days by phil- lipsite (Figure 5c).

Reactions o f glass mixtures with deionized 1-120

Synthesis starting f rom mixtures of two glasses and H20 gave results consistent with the previous data (Ta- ble 2). Exper iments confirm that phill ipsite forms pref-

erential ly in all systems be tween the eighth and the fifteenth day of reaction, whereas chabazite crystal l iz- es only in K-bearing systems. The relat ive amounts o f the two zeoli tes appear to depend on the glass pro- portions in the mixture. Once again Ca-glass does not appear to promote the crystal l izat ion o f phil l ipsite and chabazite.

Table 3 reports the composi t ion of the mother li- quors after 15 days of reaction. The concentrat ions of alkaline cations in solution are apparently related to the glass ratio only for the N a - K glass mixture. For Na-Ca and K-Ca glass systems, the alkaline cations in solution always predominate over Ca, regardless of the glass ratio. The silica concentrat ion appears strongly related to the content of Na-glass or K-glass in the mixture.

SEM observations and microanalysis

The progressive transformation of glass during the reactions was fo l lowed by selected SEM observations. In the first stages of reaction, the glass shard surfaces showed intense pitting (Figure 7a-7c), clearly indicative of attack starting on high surface-energy areas. In some cases, dissolution-crystallization developed preferential- ly along glass fractures (Figure 7d). In the early stages, Mg-glass produced a thin patina, consisting of a thick net, presumably a gel-l ike phase which is a precursor of smectite crystallization (Figure 7e and 7f).

Figure 8 shows the crystal l izat ion sequence in the K-g la s s -H20 system at 200~ After about one day a chabazite-l ike phase appeared (Figure 8a), which was nearly replaced by phil l ipsite after about two days (Figure 8b). Both zeoli tes t ransformed into analcime after 18 days (Figure 8c) and then into adularia (Figure 8d) at longer react ion t imes ( > 2 0 days).

Table 1 also reports the microanalyses of select syn- thesized phases, f rom which we conclude: (1) Phill ip- site and chabazi te have a Si/A1 ratio lower than the original glass, typical of natural occurrences; (2) High concentrat ions of Na are present in zeoli te Na-P1, in

Page 7: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

354 de' Gennaro, Langella, Cappelletti, and Colella Clays and Clay Minerals

Figure 7. a, b, c: SEM micrographs of glass shards showing intense pitting on high surface-energy areas. (a) Na-glass + H20, 200~ 1 d; (b) Na-glass + H20, 150~ 6 d; (c) detail of Figure b; (d) (Na-glass + KC1 solution, 150~ 4 d), crystallization on glass shards preferentially concentrated along fractures; (e) (Mg-glass + H20, 200~ 8 d), glass shards coated by a thin patina constituted by a thick net; (f) probably representing a gel-like phase.

analcime der ived f rom Na-glass, and part icularly in a Na-r ich phill ipsite formed in the Ca-Na mixed system (Table 1); (3) Chabazite and phill ipsite obtained f rom the system K-glass + NaC1 are rich in K and differ

only by their Si/A1 ratio, which is h igher in phill ipsite; and (4) The system Ca-glass + NaC1 can produce phil- lipsite with variable cation composi t ion, either rich in Ca or Na.

Page 8: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

Vol. 47, No. 3, 1999 Hydrothermal conversion of trachytic glass into zeolite 355

Figure 8. SEM micrographs showing the crystallization sequence in the K-glass-H20 system at 200~ (a) Chabazite crys- tallized after 1 d; (b) Phillipsite aggregates formed after 2 d; (c) Analcime crystallized after 18 d; and (d) Adularia obtained for longer reaction times (22 d).

D I S C U S S I O N

We discuss be low our results based on the physical and chemical parameters in zeoli te crystal l izat ion f rom the mode l glasses as they relate to the natural zeolit i- zation of trachytic glass.

Temperature

Temperature does not appear to play a critical role in the crystal l izat ion of the observed zeolites. Over the temperature range examined, temperature pr imari ly af- fected the reaction kinetics and did not significantly affect the resultant phase assemblages.

Time

Time was a significant parameter for these systems, pr imari ly because of metastabil i ty of zeolites. In the system Na-glass + H20, the sequence Na-P1 --~ anal- c ime was clearly recognizable (Figure 1), whereas in the system K-glass + H20, the sequence chabazi te --~ phillipsite ---) adularia + K-analc ime was observed (Figure 2). In mixed systems (Figure 5), the sequence

chabazi te ~ phillipsite, fo l lowed by K-feldspar in the presence of K-glass and by analcime in the presence o f Na-glass was typical ly found.

Alkali and alkaline-earth cations

Cations exerted a clear structure-directing role in the crystal l izat ion of zeoli tes f rom glasses. Chabazi te and phil l ipsite crystal l izat ion required the presence of K, al though both zeoli tes formed occasional ly in mixed Na-Ca systems (Figure 5c; Table 2). Note that in these systems l imited K is present as an impuri ty in Ca- glass. Ana lc ime and Na-P1 required sodic environ- ments (Figures 1 and 5a), al though an analc ime-l ike phase was obtained in the system K-glass + H20 (Fig- ure 2). By contrast, Ca did not appear to play a deter- min ing role in zeoli te crystall ization. H o w e v e r the presence of Ca appeared to produce phill ipsite or cha- bazite, where Na or K was also present, respectively. The presence of Ca in some phill ipsite obtained f rom the Ca-glass + NaC1 system may indicate that this cat ion enters the zeoli te structure during format ion and

Page 9: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

356 de' Gennaro, Langella, Cappelletti, and Colella Clays and Clay Minerals

not as a consequence of cation exchange. The different Ca content in the two phillipsites obtained after six days of reaction in the Ca-glass + NaC1 system is explained by Ghiara and Petti (1996). They showed that the interaction of shoshonitic glasses and H20 lead to an initial crystallization of a Ca-rich phillipsite which is replaced by a K-rich phillipsite after longer reaction times. The rapid crystallization may favor the coexistence of a "first generation" Ca-rich phillipsite with a "second generation" Na-rich phase. These re- suits may explain the occurrence of Ca-rich phillipsite in particular geological systems such as those of py- roclastic flows of the Mt. Ernici district (Central Italy) (de' Gennaro et al., 1982b). In fact, these phillipsites are characterized by the impossibility of total Ca sub- stitution for Na or K by cation exchange (Langella et al., 1993; Carnevali et al., 1994).

G l a s s - H 2 0 interact ion

The glass-HeO interaction begins with glass hydro- lysis and the consequent increase of pH in solution, which further favors glass dissolution. According to Hawkins (1981), the concentration of SiO2 in solution can provide insight on the dissolution process and on zeolite formation. Crystallization begins after a few hours of interaction, when the SiO2 concentration reaches high values. As the interaction continues, an equilibrium between glass dissolution and zeolite crys- tallization is attained and silica in solution remains nearly constant. Alkaline cations show a similar trend, except for Na which is slightly depleted as analcime crystallizes. The low concentration of SiO2 in solution for Ca and Mg-glass experiments does not favor crys- tallization of zeolites. Synthesis with Mg-glass, how- ever, produces a smectite-like phase in the final stage of reaction, despite the low silica concentration. In this system, the reaction process is characterized by glass dissolution, immediately followed by precipitation of a gel-like phase. The low pH favors six-fold coordi- nation of A1, thus promoting the crystallization of smectite (De Jong et al., 1983). The great difference in solubility between the alkali glasses and the alka- line-earth glasses is noteworthy, as well as their very different reactivity.

Glass-so lu t ion in teract ion

According to Shiraki and Iiyama (1990), the first stage of reaction with monosaline solutions involves exchange of solution cations with the glass. This ex- change process explains the observed initial decrease of cation concentration in solution. The rapid Ca re- duction in CaC12 solution as the pH increases may be related to precipitation of the fairly soluble hydroxide. In fact, after only two days of reaction, the pH of the solution is > 12, giving rise to precipitation of most of the Ca present.

In the presence of various mixed-cation systems the synthesized mineral assemblages are very similar to those found as products of epigenetic transformation of trachytic glass. This is evidence of the decisive role played by the glass composition on the phases formed and on the typical phillipsite-chabazite-analcime as- semblages usually found in trachytic volcaniclastic de- posits, such as in Italy, Germany, and Canary Islands (de' Gennaro et al., 1995; de' Gennaro and Langella, 1996). In fact, the above phases are the only zeolites formed in nature by the transformation of glasses with a Si/A1 ratio ranging between 2.33-2.88 (de' Gennaro et al., 1987a; 1987b). The only example of crystalli- zation of a different assemblage from a basaltic glass (Si/A1 --2.90) is that reported by Ibrahim and Hall (1995), who described a Quaternary volcaniclastic for- mation from Jordan, where an unusual faujasite-phil- lipsite occurrence in some basal layers was found. The authors ascribe the crystallization of faujasite to the presence of very dilute solutions. Elsewhere, alteration of silica-rich glasses produces phillipsite and silica- rich zeolites such as clinoptilolite and mordenite (Gi- anello and Gottardi, 1969; Sheppard, 1971).

CONCLUSIONS

The alteration of synthetic glasses with a Si/A1 ratio (2.67) similar to that of natural trachytic glasses (i.e., Phlegraean Fields) at 200~ leads to phillipsite and chabazite when H20 is the interacting solution. In these systems, pH and composition of the solution change as a consequence of glass leaching. The for- mation of phillipsite and chabazite, however, requires K. Calcium is not important in zeolite crystallization in trachytic glasses, whereas Na leads to analcime for- mation.

These results explain the mutual occurrence of phil- lipsite and chabazite in zeolitized products of many volcanic districts. In natural systems containing K, Na, and Ca, the relative abundance of these two zeolites is related to the prevailing concentration of any of these cations in the genetic system. For instance cha- bazite, as a dominant authigenic phase in zeolitized volcaniclastics, is often related to a system character- ized by a Ca/K ratio lower than Ca/Na, such as in K- chabazite-rich tuff from Vesuvius (de' Gennaro et al., 1987a; 1987b).

The composition of the contact solution is important for low-reactive glasses. For example, the Ca-glass + H20 system does not lead to crystallization under the experimental conditions of the present study. In the other systems with H20, no substantial differences in phase assemblages were noted. In contrast, heteroionic solutions obviously favored crystallization of chaba- zite and phillipsite.

Experimental crystallization sequences show that chabazite consistently precedes phillipsite. This occur- rence is unique from that found in nature, where in

Page 10: HYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO … 47/47-3-348.pdfHYDROTHERMAL CONVERSION OF TRACHYTIC GLASS TO ZEOLITE. 3. MONOCATIONIC MODEL GLASSES MAURIZIO DE' GENNARO, 1 ALESSIO

Vol. 47, No. 3, 1999 Hydrothermal conversion of trachytic glass into zeolite 357

the few cases obse rved phil l ipsi te is normal ly embed- ded in chabazi te crystals, demonst ra t ing that chabazi te is a l a te - formed phase (de ' Gennaro and Colella, 1991). These di f ferent f indings can be ascr ibed to a more complex compos i t ion of natural glasses in terms of alkaline and alkaline-earth cations. Finally, it cannot be exc luded that a different cat ionic compos i t ion of the solut ions occurs prior to their react ion wi th the volcanic glass.

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S

The authors thank D.L. Bish (Los Alamos National Lab- oratory, USA) for his helpful suggestions and for critical reading of the manuscript. The authors also thank D.B. Haw- kins and J.W. Carey for the revision of the text and useful comments as referees.

R E F E R E N C E S

Baerlocher, Ch. and Meier, W.M. (1972) The crystal structure of synthetic zeolite Na-P1, an isotype of gismondine. Zeit- schrift far Kristallographie, 135, 339-354.

Barrer, R.M. and Hinds, L. (1953) Ion-exchange in crystals of analcite and leucite. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1879-1883.

Carnevali, R., Gualtieri, A., and Passaglia, E. (1994) Quan- titative determination of zeolite component in Italian pyr- oclastites by the Rietveld analysis of X-Ray powder pat- terns. Materials Engineering, 5, 211-221.

de' Gennaro, M. and Colella, C. (1991) The critical role of temperature in the natural zeolitization of volcanic glass. Neues Jahrbuch Fiir Mineralogie-Monatshefte, 8, 355-362.

de' Gennaro, M. and Colella, C. (1992) Experimental clay formation through the action of hot saline waters on vol- canic glass. Mineralogica et Petrographica Acta, 35A, 275-282.

de' Gennaro, M. and Langella, A. (1996) Italian zeolitized rocks of technological interest. Mineralium Deposita, 31, 452-472.

de' Gennaro, M., Franco, E., Langella, A., Mirra, R, and Mor- ra, V. (1982a) Le phillipsiti dei tuff gialli del napoletano. Periodico di Mineralogia, 51, 287-310.

de' Gennaro, M., Franco, E., Langella, A., Mirra, R, and Mor- ra, V. (1982b) Le zeoliti delle piroclastiti dei Monti Ernici. La phillipsite dei peperini. Acta Naturalia "'L'Ateneo Par- mense", 18, 163-173.

de' Gennaro, M., Franco, E., Rossi, M., Langella, A., and Ronca, A. (1987a) Epigenetic minerals in the volcanoclas- tic deposits from central-southern Italy: A contribution to zeolite genesis. Rendiconti dell' Accademia di Scienze Fis- iche e Matematiche Napoli, Special Issue, 107-131.

de' Gennaro, M., Di Girolamo, R, Mirra, R, and Morra, V. (1987b) Phillipsite in some pyroclastic flows from Tenerife (Canary Islands). Rendiconti dell' Accademia di Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche Napoli, Special Issue, 133-159.

de' Gennaro, M., Colella, C., Franco, E., and Stanzione, D. (1988) Hydrothermal conversion of trachytic glass into ze- olite. I: Reactions with deionized water. Neues Jahrbuch Fiir Mineralogie-Monatshefte, 4, 149-158.

de' Gennaro, M., Colella, C., Pansini, M., and Langella, A. (1992) Reconstruction of a natural zeolitization process

through laboratory simulations. In Ninth International Ze- olite Conference, R. von Balmoos, J.B. Higgins, and M.M.J. Treacy, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 2, 207-214.

de' Gennaro, M., Colella, C., and Pansini, M. (1993) Hydro- thermal conversion of trachytic glass into zeolite. II Re- actions with high-salinity waters. Neues Jahrbuch Far Mi- neralogie-Monatshefte, 3, 97-110.

de' Gennaro, M., Adabbo, M., and Langella, A. (1995) Hy- pothesis on the genesis of zeolites in some european vol- caniclastic deposits. In Natural Zeolites '93, D.W. Ming and EA. Mumpton, eds., Brockport, New York, 51-67.

De Jong, H.W.S., Schramm, C.M., and Parziale, V.E. (1983) Polymerization of silicate and aluminate tetrahedra in glass- es, melts, and aqueous solutions--IV. Aluminium coordi- nation in glasses and aqueous solutions and comments on the aluminium avoidance principle. Geochimica et Cos- mochimica Acta, 47, 1223-1236.

Di Girolamo, P., Ghiara, M.R., Lirer, L., Munno, R., Rolandi, G., and Stanzione, D. (1984) Vulcanologia e petrologia dei Campi Flegrei. Bollettino della Societ& Geologica ltaliana, 103, 349-413.

Ghiara, M.R. and Petti, C. (1996) Chemical alteration of vol- canic glasses and related control by secondary minerals. Experimental studies. Aquatic Geochemistry, 1, 329-354.

Gianello, A. and Gottardi, G. (1969) Sulla zeolitizzazione del livello cineritico detto "Tripoli di Contignaco". Mineralo- gica et Petrographica Acta, 15, 5-8.

Hawkins, D.B. (1981) Kinetics of glass dissolution and zeo- lite formation under hydrothermal conditions. Clays and Clay Minerals, 29, 331-340.

Ibrahim, K. and Hall, A. (1995) New occurrences of diage- netic faujasite in the Quaternary tufts of north-east Jordan. European Journal of Mineralogy, 7, 1129-1135.

Langella, A., de' Gennaro, M., Pansini, M., Colella, C., and Cantalini, C. (1993) Thermal stability of some Italian nat- ural phillipsites. In Proceedings of JournYes Mediterran~- enes de Calorimdtrie et d'Analyse Thermique "93, N. Balbi, ed., Sammarcelli, Biguglia (France), 229-232.

Orsi, G., Civetta, L., D'Antonio, M., Di Girolamo, R, and Piochi, M. (1995) Step-filling and development of a three- layer magma chamber: The Neapolitan Yellow Tuff case history. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 67, 291-312.

Passaglia, E. and Vezzalini, G. (1985) Crystal chemistry of diagenetic zeolites in volcanoclastic deposits of Italy. Con- tribution to Mineralogy and Petrology, 90, 190-198.

Scarpati, C., Cole, P., and Perrotta, A. (1993) The Neapolitan Yellow Tuff--A large multiphase eruption from Campi Fle- grei, Southern Italy. Bullettin of Volcanology, 55, 343 356.

Scherillo, A. and Scherillo, M. (1990) I Campi Flegrei e la stratigrafia napoletana. Quaderni Accademia Pontaniana, 11, 138 pp.

Sheppard, R.A. (1971) Zeolites in sedimentary deposits of the United States--A review. In Molecular Sieve Zeolites, R.F Gould, ed., American Chemical Society, Advances in Chemistry Series, 101, 279-310.

Shiraky, R. and Iiyama, J.T. (1990) Na-K ion exchange re- action between rhyolitic glass and (Na,K)C1 aqueous so- lution under hydrothermal conditions. Geochimica et Cos- mochimica Acta, 54, 2923-2931.

(Received 14 January 1998; accepted 24 January 1999; Ms. 98-007)