Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

35
Treatment of Non- ideality in Sedimentation Velocity Experiments Walter Stafford, Boston Biomedical Research Institute, Watertown, MA 02472 U.S.A.

description

Treatment of Non-ideality in Sedimentation Velocity Experiments Walter Stafford, Boston Biomedical Research Institute, Watertown, MA 02472 U.S.A. Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality. Generally empirical backflow (A.J. Rowe …) charge effects (Donnan equilibrium). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Page 1: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Treatment of Non-ideality in Sedimentation Velocity

Experiments

Walter Stafford,Boston Biomedical Research Institute,

Watertown, MA 02472 U.S.A.

Page 2: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Hydrodynamicvs

Thermodynamicnon-ideality

s f (c)Dg(c)

Page 3: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

s f (c)Generally empirical

backflow (A.J. Rowe …)charge effects (Donnan equilibrium)

Except for large asymmetric proteins,charge effects usually dominate backflow.

Page 4: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Dg(c)Both hydrodynamic and thermodynamic contributions

Except for large asymmetric proteins,charge effects usually dominate excluded volume effects.

Page 5: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

f (c) f (0) 1K sc

Frictional coefficient

HYDRODYNAMIC

Affects both s and D

Page 6: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Hydrodynamic c-dependence= same for s and D

sso

1 ksc and D

Do1 ksc

FC=gradient of centrifugal potential FD=gradient of chemical potential

frictional resistance is the same for both

Page 7: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Thermodynamicconcentration dependence

1 ln(y)

ln(c)

Excluded volume and Donnan equilibrium

Page 8: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Colligative virial coefficients

ln(y) BcCc2 Dc3 ...

B, C and D are the 2nd, 3rd and fourth virial colligative coefficients, respectively.(McMillan and Mayer, 1945, statistical thermodynamics)

Page 9: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Combined hydrodynamic and thermodynamic concentration

dependence of D

D D o

1 ln(y)

ln(c)

1 ksc

Page 10: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

ln(yi ) Bici Cici2 Dic i

3 ...

ci ln(yi )

ci

ln(yi )

ln(ci )2Bci 3Cci

2 4Dci3 ...

Page 11: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

DDo12BM1c

1 ksc

Expansion truncated after the 2nd virial term …

(Cf. Also Harding and Johnson, 1985; and Alex Solovyova et al, 2001)

Page 12: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

DDo 12BM1c ksc

Expansion truncated after the 2nd virial term …And further approximation …

(both Harding and Johnson, 1985; and Alex Solovyova et al, 2001)

1

1ax1 ax ... for small a

Page 13: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Multiple Species

Self-associating system

Page 14: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

ln(yi ) Bici Cici2 Dic i

3 ...

ln(yi ) Biici Bijc jji

n

Ciici2 Cijkc jck

ji

n

ki

n

Diic i3 Dijklc jckcl

li

n

ki

n

ji

n

...

Cross terms …

Single species (no cross terms)

Multiple species (cross terms)

Page 15: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Self-associating system all species must have the same charge to mass ratio

andfrictional ratio

However …

Page 16: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Di Dio 12BM1cT

1 ksjc jj1

n

Page 17: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

g(s) 6

Non-ideal reversible monomer-dimer system

Protein-X

Lowest cIntermediate c

Highest c

Page 18: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality
Page 19: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Sedanal

Global fitting with SEDANAL

= 280 nm and 220 nm; path length = 12mm and 3 mm

Page 20: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality
Page 21: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Global fitting with SEDANAL

= 280 nm; path length = 12mm and 3 mm

Page 22: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Future plans

Extend to higher concentrations

Page 23: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Higher order terms

Add higher order terms …

Page 24: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

ln(yi )

ln(ci )2Bci 3Cci

2 4Dci3 ...

Page 25: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Donnan equilibriumFor uni-univalent electrolyte

e.g. NaCl

BZ 2

4M22m3

C 0

D Z 4

64M24m3

3

Roark and Yphantis 1971 Biochemistry

Page 26: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

BZ 2

4M22m3

DB2

4m3

Page 27: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

"Significant" is >= 1% contribution

Page 28: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Excluded volume effects

BM1 4vL

d

Page 29: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Hard sphere approx.or some other model

ln(i) f (c,{a})

Page 30: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Hard Sphere models

Minton 2007 J. Pharm Sci.

Page 31: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Minton 2007, Biophys J.

Scattering …

Page 32: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

M1 M1,app 1 ln(y1)

ln(c1)

ln(y1)

ln(c j )M j ,app

ji

n

M1 ln(y1)

ln(c j )M j ,app

ji

n

M1,app 1 ln(y1)

ln(c1)

M1,app

M1 1 ln(y1) ln(c j )

M j ,app

M1ji

n

1 ln(y1) ln(c1)

M1,app

M1 1 ln(y1) ln(c j )

M j ,app

M1ji

n

1 ln(y1) ln(c1)

sRTc

1 ln(y1) ln(c j )

M j ,app

M1ji

n

D 1 ln(y1) ln(c1)

D1,app D1 1 ln(y1)

ln(c1)

1 ln(y1) ln(c j )

M j ,app

M1ji

n

Poly-disperse system

Page 33: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

D1,app D 1 ln(y1)

ln(c1)

1 ln(y1) ln(c j )

M j ,app

M1ji

n

Page 34: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

Conclusions

Non-ideality in interacting systemsSimple linear approachExpand to higher order terms of virial

expansion with cross-termsOr use direct function

Page 35: Hydrodynamic vs Thermodynamic non-ideality

TMP

TURBO-MOLECULAR PUMP