Hybridparks - Garden Shows and Festivals as a business model … · 2014. 11. 8. · 4.3 Exhibitor...
Transcript of Hybridparks - Garden Shows and Festivals as a business model … · 2014. 11. 8. · 4.3 Exhibitor...
1
Garden Shows and Festivals as a
business model –
Case studies and innovative
approaches
Prepared by E M Bennis September 2014
2
3
Contents 1.0 Introduction: Aim and Purpose 2.0 Overview of Garden Shows 3.0 Methodology
3.1 Approach 3.2 Site selection 3.3 Initial actions 3.4 Introduction to case studies
4.0 Site Form Assessment 4.1Key Facts
4.1.1 Name & logo 4.1.2 Show category 4.1.3 Location 4.1.4 Venue 4.1.5 Gross floor area 4.1.6 Dates 4.1.7 Origins 4.1.8 Themes 4.1.9 Opening times 4.1.10 Ticket price
4.2 Visitor Facts 4.3 Exhibitor Facts 4.4 Location & Facilities
4.4.1 Access 4.4.2 Facilities
4.5 Exhibitions & Show Gardens 4.5.1 Floral displays 4.5.2 Exhibition gardens 4.5.3 Trade stalls
4.6 Associated & Parallel Events 4.7 Awards 4.8-4.9 Exhibitors Terms, Conditions & Contracts 4.10 Show History 4.11 Marketing 4.12 Site Photographs 4.13 Organisation & Contacts
4.14 Sponsorship 4.15 Economic Impact 4.16 Interviews 4.17 Summary & Conclusions
5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 6.0 Appendices
Site survey forms
4
5
1.0 Introduction: Aim and Purpose It is the main aim of the study to provide sufficient and appropriate information to consider the development of some new or alternative form of garden shows. The study researches the role of garden shows and festivals and their impact in several categories, such as the variety of uses and potential for parks and gardens, the economic benefits, tourism but also inward investment and job creation. The study establishes an overview what shows there are and what the nature of the show is. Those shows that are the most compatible with the physical resources and the ideological base of the parks and gardens within Hybrid Parks were selected as case studies for detail investigation. The case studies included Philadelphia Flower Show, Giardina in Zurich, the Keukenhof near Amsterdam, two shows in Germany, “Floralie” in Nantes, Chaumont in France and the RHS shows at Chelsea, Hampton Court and Tatton Park as well as some smaller, more local orientated shows. Case studies provide key facts (such as location, venue, gross floor area, dates, origins, theme, opening times, and ticket prices), visitor facts (including number of visitors, age groups, professional visitors, reasons for attendance, visitor assessment, origin of local visitors, home/garden ownership and intention to invest in a garden) and exhibitor facts (total number of exhibitors, main exhibitor goals and attainment, ratings, market positioning). Each case study also delivers information and evaluation on location and facilities, exhibitions and show gardens, associated/parallel events, awards, marketing, sponsorship, exhibitor terms and conditions and end with a concise summary and conclusions. A series of recommendations was distilled from the case studies offering good prospects for new shows. There is certainly the need and opportunity to extend beyond the current norm of visitor profile with a narrow range of age and socio-economic groups. This may move the current idea of a garden show into new dimensions. There may be an emphasis on the arts and music to attract younger generations; environmental issues could form an underlying base; regional food could also attract more visitors. Working with students on the design of show gardens may add fresh ideas to a show and attract new visitor groups. A show based solely on gardens and plants will have a finite audience, a broader base line could prove more economically beneficial as well as more sustainable. Study commissioned by Schloss Dyck Foundation and realised by Prof Ed Bennis
6
2.0 Overview of Garden Shows
Popular and international in their scope, flower and garden shows span every
continent and attract millions of visitors. These range from small, local shows and
competitions to major schemes often used for regeneration such as the Floriade in
Holland and the Gartenshau in Germany. Modern smaller shows reflect the origins
of the shows which are probably based in the 17th century with the development of
florist societies with rules for assessing form, colour and quality. Similarly,
vegetables entered the competitive framework of local shows in terms of producing
the largest and visually perfect tomato, onion or zucchini. Both vegetables and
flowers still feature in shows, although vegetables have become less dominant in
recent years. Flowers are without a doubt the mainstay of shows; in more recent
years, exhibition gardens have taken a prominent role despite the substantial
investment to produce them. With some exceptions such as plant fairs, shows
require significant sponsorship as they become larger and more elaborate every
year.
There is very little published information on the history and development of garden
and flower shows. A standard reference for all things garden related, The Oxford
Companion to Gardens, does not even mention them, although it directs the reader
to the German Gartenshau. The following clips from the Guardian & Pathe News
may be interesting:
http://www.theguardian.com/news/2014/aug/03/better-days-back-village-flower-show-returns-
observer-archive
http://www.britishpathe.com/workspaces/graham-english-productions/rs2AivB2
http://www.britishpathe.com/workspaces/BritishPathe/Chelsea-Flower-Show
Public expectations increase as this year’s show must be better, different and larger
than last years. Shows such as Chelsea, Philadelphia and Singapore set a standard
that is almost impossible to achieve without years of development. The Philadelphia
Flower Show was established in 1829 and claims to be the oldest flower show, while
Chelsea’s first show was 1913, although the Royal Horticultural Society’s (RHS) first
flower show was in 1833. Both of these shows are managed by the Pennsylvania
Horticultural Society (PHS) and the RHS respectively which is important in terms of
A vegetable exhibit in a village flower show by
the head gardener at Hafodonus House in
north Wales in the 1950s.
This type of exhibit can still be found in village
shows, but they are disappearing from the
larger garden and flower shows.
Photo from author’s collection
7
marketing, attracting sponsorship and reputation. The link between these major
shows and societies appears to be invaluable and the RHS runs a number of major
and minor shows in the UK. The PHS is particularly notable for its support of local
initiatives such as urban food production in deprived areas. These are organisations
that go far beyond the shows that the public are familiar and have built a much
broader reputation for areas related to horticulture including environmental issues,
sustainability and education.
There are questions about what is appropriate for a garden or flower show, or what
should a show have and not have. Purists object to the amount of trade stalls found
at many of the shows, often with items that have no horticultural base and most
shows financially rely on selling space for trade stalls. Sam Lemheny, director of the
Philadelphia Flower Show, has referred to their market place at the show as a ‘cash
cow’ and the show would undoubtedly operate at a loss without them. Even when a
show is subsidised from other means such as industry or government agencies,
trade stalls are an important revenue line.
Some shows are very clear that they are not a garden or flower show, but a market
for garden and horticultural supplies as well as decorative lifestyle furnishings. The
show at Schloss Dyck, Gartenlust, is an example of this approach. Arley’s Garden
Festival is similar although there is a flower marquee, it too relies on trade stalls and
admission charges for its revenue. Both of these events have operated for many
years demonstrate that is possible to produce such shows with a profit.
3.0 Methodology
3.1 Approach: From the original tender, the approach was to investigate garden
shows and how they could diversify the use of parks and gardens, financially
contribute to their support and to broaden the user base. The proposal was to
investigate shows that were distinctly different in their scale and approach. It was
not appropriate to select and examine one type of show such as a flower show or a
plant fair. While this would be useful in explicit detail of that type of show, it was
thought to be too narrow in scope and would not achieve the objectives of the
programme.
3.2 Site selection: The initial selection started by a scoping exercise for the range of
shows in terms of type, scale, location, visitor numbers, reputation, time of year and
the ability to access them within a tight time frame. It was clear from the outset that
there was little information available in print form or for that matter electronically.
Web sites are normally about the individual shows most giving only basic information
such as dates, costs, special events and seductive photos from the previous years.
One of the few sites that take a broader view is www.flowers.about.com which lists
the top 12 shows in 2014. Interestingly the top show listed is in Toronto with
Chelsea in second place. Five shows are in the UK, four in the USA, one in New
Zealand and one in Australia. There are no shows listed within continental Europe.
8
There is always a question of who produces and sponsors a site and if there is a
predisposition to particular countries or shows.
3.3 Initial actions: Having identified several approved sites for the project, the
following actions were followed:
Search and investigate web sites and published sources related to those
shows
Consult with other professionals for recommendations for shows to investigate
and visit
To develop a site form for the recording of information
Consult with Schloss Dyck (Christian Grüβen) on the site form and type of
information to be collected
Contact with the show directors, exhibitors or other appropriate persons for
information and possible interview
Modify the site form to account for other information
Arrange for site visits and potential meetings
Visit and assess show
Consider the addition of other shows (five sites have been added to the initial
survey list)
Compile data on individual sites after having visited the show
Contact show organisers and exhibitors after the visit where necessary for
additional information
3.4 Introduction to case studies: As the case studies were chosen to explore
options and alternative approaches, it is not always possible to make direct
comparisons. Some short notes follow on the various flower and garden shows.
There are site reports in the appendices with supporting photographs and
comments. Sites are presented in alphabetical order.
Arley Garden Festival, Cheshire, UK: a private and self-funding outdoor fair
which is mostly a flower show and plant sales for 2 days. The festival also has
other features including classic cars and a gardener’s question time. 6000-
7000 visitors. In addition to the garden festival, plant fairs takes place three
times a year in an historic garden: spring, summer and autumn, each lasts for
1 day.
Chaumont, Loire Valley, France: outdoors with 24 show gardens from April
to November. Individual settings for each garden. Show is within grounds of a
chateau and gardens, tickets give access to all features. Considered more
adventurous and avant-garde compared to most other shows.
Dig the City, Manchester, UK: outdoors and the only purely urban garden
festival, in August for 10 days with some display gardens and a strong
emphasis on children participating in gardens. No visitor demographics.
9
Floralies, Nantes: indoor in five large exhibition halls with some outdoor
sales areas in May for 10 days. Unusual in that it is essentially a floral display
and only takes place every five years on a rota basis with other European
cities. States that there are 500,000 visitors.
Gartenlust Schloss Dyck, nr. Düsseldorf: outdoors for 4 days in June.
Uses existing display gardens and an historic parkland landscape as an
outdoor market space for the sale of plants, and garden/ horticultural
products. Approximately 15,000 visitors.
Giardina, Zurich: indoors with very high quality show gardens and garden
related products for 5 days in March. Geared towards visitors investing in
their garden, rather than simply an exhibition. All exhibitors pay for their
display space which is unusual compared to other shows. Around 60,000
visitors.
Keukenhof, Holland: outdoor display of 7 million spring bulbs from March to
May for 8 weeks with flower exhibits in three permanent structures. Very
focused and with an international reputation. Around 1 million visitors in 2014.
Landesgartenshau, Zülpich, Germany: a reclaimed site from brown coal
extraction which has exhibition gardens and new recreational facilities
including outdoor concert arena, beach and water sports. Open as a festival
site from April to October after which it becomes a permanent public park.
Anticipate around 400,000 visitors, peak numbers of 7,000 at weekends.
Nordpark, Düsseldorf: the site report contains only a few photographs. A
local one day plant fair which is typical in many countries and in some cases
raising money for charities. Mixture of small professional and amateur
growers. This specific fair was also operating a bring & buy system of plants.
Philadelphia Flower Show, USA: indoors with a very theatrical approach to
the show displays in March for 9 days. Strong level of entertainment. About
half of the floor area is devoted to the ‘marketplace sales’. Largest show in
USA with 250,000visitors.
RHS Chelsea Flower Show, UK: outdoor with large pavilions; show gardens;
flower marquee; garden furnishings and supplies, etc. May, in central London
for 5 days. Very much part of the London social season along with Henley
Regatta, Wimbledon, and Ascot. Cramped site and very crowded. Always
sold out. Largest visitor numbers of UK show with 157,000; numbers limited
due to health and safety.
RHS Hampton Court Flower Show, UK: outdoor with numerous pavilions,
similar to Chelsea but much larger site; Early July for 6 days, in suburban
London. Less expensive and more of a relaxed atmosphere than Chelsea.
Largest in terms of site of the RHS shows.
RHS Tatton Flower Show, UK: outdoors and the youngest of the RHS major
shows; late July for 5 days in a rural area south of Manchester in northwest
England. Recent difficulties in attracting high quality show gardens. Has
10
never made a profit; supported by the regional government. Numbers of
visitors have dropped in recent years to 90,000
Of the thirteen sites above, only the Arley Garden Festival has not been visited by
the author due to other commitments. The marketing manager was interviewed for
the report and the author is very familiar with Arley and the range of activities there.
4.0 Site Form Assessment
This section reviews the site assessment form as a whole with reference to the sites
in the appendices. The sequence follows the titles on the forms. No site has a full
entry as some points are not relevant to the particular site or the information was not
available. To gain a better understanding of issues, potentials and details it is
advised that the appendices are read prior to this section as this acts as a summary
of the whole. There is a short form for Nordpark in Düsseldorf as it is a one day
plant fair.
4.1 KEY FACTS
4.1.1Name and logo: Nomenclature or the title of a show poses some difficulty. The
same word can have different meanings certainly in terms such as garden show or
flower show; garden show can mean many things while using the term flower is most
likely to include flower displays. Most shows have multiple aspects but terms can be
very misleading such as the Garden Show in Croatia is in fact a rock festival. The
Swiss use a more generic term, Giardina, to cover their show which helps to identify
what the show is about but also allows for flexibility and change in future years.
Others such as Chelsea have such strong images and reputations that the full title of
the RHS Chelsea Flower Show is shortened to the place name. Similarly, the
Keukenhof uses a place name which is recognised as a spring bulb garden rather
than a place. This approach is only appropriate when a show is well known.
Most shows adhere to a title that describes what the event is about as it conveys a
message to the potential visitor: garden show, garden market, flower show, garden
festival. Giardina has a sub-title of Live the Garden where garden is the key word in
both the show name and the sub-title. English or words closely associated with the
English form are popular as they convey an air of international status and are often
easily recognised.
Logos are always considered to be a key element for recognition and marketing.
Shows at Chaumont, Schloss Dyck, Philadelphia and the RHS shows use the logo of
the organisations that run the shows. These are recognised brands for the public
and the title of the show follows or is associated with the corporate logo. Keukenhof
has incorporated its name into the logo, again a well-known title and brand. The
Floralies has developed a logo that visually states it is a flower show and Dig the City
projects a different image of a hands-on approach and fun. The logos are important
11
for not only marketing but identity and can reflect different national styles or
approaches.
4.1.2 Show category: Shows vary in terms of what their purpose is, and what
facilities there are. This is simply a means of a quick overview of the main features or
activities of the show.
4.1.3 Location: Show grounds range from city centre, suburban and to rural. With
each come the associated benefits and problems. Shows such as Chelsea,
Philadelphia and Zurich are in city centres that have good public transport access,
hotels and high density populations. However, there are the associated costs of
often expensive hotels and restaurants for exhibitors and visitors. Heavy traffic and
in the case of London, and additional charge to use a car leads to inconvenience and
increased costs (Chelsea runs a shuttle service for car users). City centre seems to
work best when there is good public transport and other points of interest as a tourist
base to encourage a longer stay, or bed-nights.
Rural based shows mean that the majority of visitors will arrive by private car;
however, larger shows with a good reputation will attract coach groups to the show.
The Keukenhof has coped with the problems of 1 million visitors with not only large
car parks, but also with a highly developed system of links to major connection
points such as Amsterdam centre and the airport. Schloss Dyck runs a shuttle
service at a financial loss from Düsseldorf.
While city centre sites have traffic congestion, rural sites can suffer as the
infrastructure may not support large increases in vehicles. Traffic measures are in
place for the Tatton and Hampton Court shows with some roads closed, traffic re-
directed and limited access and exit to lessen the impact and spread the traffic load.
Tatton in its first year demonstrated the problem when traffic came to a complete
standstill as the RHS had not predicted, or fully considered the impact on the area.
Many visitors with pre-purchased tickets never arrived at the show. This has been
resolved through the use of specialist traffic consultants and the police.
4.1.4 Venue: Three shows are held indoors, while the rest are outdoors with some
temporary or permanent exhibition structures. There are advantages and problems
in both situations:
Indoors:
The greatest advantage is that the show is not affected by weather conditions
Structure is in place for fast build period
Support teams to deal with electrics, water, circulation management, etc
Delicate plant, particularly flowers, in safe environment
Floors are level; no need for grading
Rooms available for meetings, presentations
Use of artificial light for special effects
12
Normally hotels, parking and restaurants nearby
Easy to secure area when closed
Access can be difficult in build and removal period
Lack of natural light changes the perception of the garden
Plants can become ‘stressed’ through lack of natural light and air circulation
Usually more limited space compared to outdoor events
Noise can overwhelm a space
Not possible to have sunken areas unless the exhibit is built higher than floor
level
Air quality and circulation can be poor (Floralies)
Space can seem cramped and overcrowded (RHS marquees)
Outdoors:
Large areas allow for space between exhibits (not the case in Chelsea)
Natural light and air allow for good plant quality
Large areas nearby for car parking (rural sites)
Good access for build and removal period
Good for mid-late season shows
Better feeling of a garden show than indoors
Poor weather is greatest problem for build period and open days
Need for temporary roads and footpaths due to large visitor numbers and poor
weather
Marquee needed for plants subject to damage from winds, storms etc
Security can be a problem after hours
Gardens can ‘dig down’ for added effect
High costs for initial set-up of marquees, water, electricity, security fences
Need for multiple temporary shelters
Garden lighting not effective
4.1.5 Gross floor area: This gives an indication of the amount of space for specific
shows and is useful when estimating the amount of space required for the number of
exhibitors and visitors. Information was not available for all sites.
4.1.6 Dates: Most shows take place in early spring to early summer, there are a few
shows that take place in the autumn focused on plant fairs and small flower
exhibitions rather than exhibition gardens.
Shows tend to run for 3-7 days, although Chaumont is the exception in that it runs
from April to November and sits within the Loire Valley, a UNESCO World Heritage
Site, and has a long visitor season. Keukenhof has an 8 week spring season for the
bulb display but there are peak periods where they are at the best. Trip advisor
13
advises not to go when the flower parade is on as it is too busy to see anything.
Floralies in Nantes is unique in that the event only takes place every five years.
Show dates are designed to allow a specific range of plants to be exhibited, in most
cases this is earlier than their natural flowering season and require special conditions
for forcing, or for holding back. Other aspects that affect show dates are other
garden shows but also major events such as football matches, World Cup and
Wimbledon. In 2012, the Tatton show was moved because of the Olympics. The
Philadelphia show has considered moving the show a few weeks later because snow
has hit visitor numbers in previous years; however, most exhibitors prefer the early
date as their landscape business becomes too busy later on to release staff for the
show.
School holidays appear to have little impact on visitor numbers probably due to the
age profile of most visitors. While many shows have attempted to attract younger
families, they have not been very successful.
4.1.7 Origins: date of the first time the event was held.
4.1.8 Theme: Many shows have traditionally used a theme as a marketing tool and
as guidelines for exhibitors. The Philadelphia site form gives a list of themes that
have been used over many years. Where a theme is used for show gardens, it is
often very difficult to recognise the theme as many exhibitors ignore them. There are
exceptions such as Chaumont where the theme of 7 Deadly Sins is supported by all
24 gardens. It is not always clear as there has been a liberal interpretation of the
themes but display panels at each garden, in French and English, provide the link.
Hampton Court interestingly had an exhibit of 7 gardens for the 7 Deadly Sins which
were more literal in the interpretation. The RHS has moved away from themes for a
full show and has developed zones such as Inspire, Grow or Escape. These are
sufficiently vague yet open for interesting interpretation. Giardina uses its subtitle of
Live Your Garden (slightly poor English but the point is made). The Floralies adopted
the theme A Bouquet of Art linking flowers and art. Philadelphia merged art and
horticulture together to form Articulture, a clever play on words which was supported
in many, but not all exhibits. RHS Tatton had a theme of Carnival but outside of a
Ferris wheel and a small parade there was little evidence of it having a major impact.
Schloss Dyck has not used a theme for four years and the impression is that a single
theme is too restrictive for the exhibitors. However, in Manchester Dig the City as a
title with its theme being urban gardening works well due to its location, scale and
limited exhibits.
Themes are also found in the floral marquees although most are exhibiting a specific
group of flowers dependent upon the season. The Keukenhoff, although known for
spring bulbs, has an exhibition of lilies in one pavilion, while another is devoted
almost entirely too orchid displays.
14
4.1.9 Opening times: There is a similarity between many of the shows that open
between 09.00-10.00 and close between 19.00-20.00. Some have special evening
shows with night lighting including Chaumont, Floralies, and Keukenhof.
Families tend to use Sunday as the main visiting day. In the UK, there are often
activities for children such as sports, music lessons etc that take place on Saturday.
In Germany, Saturday is a main shopping day since shops are closed on Sunday.
4.1.10 Ticket prices: There are substantial differences in prices in part due to the
quality of the show and if there are options to include additional events. Arley and
Schloss Dyck allow access to the gardens with the price of admission. Chaumont
has a more complex ticket system which can include the parkland and art exhibits;
the chateau, parkland and art exhibits; and, chateau, parkland, art exhibits and show
gardens. Philadelphia has the most complex ticket system due to add-ons, Chelsea
is the most expensive and always sold out. There are specific prices for each of the
sites on their site form.
4.2 VISITOR FACTS
Visitor demographics: Despite many requests, few show operators either did not
respond to request for this information, or they do not have it. Giardina and
Philadelphia have generally good information, and the RHS has reasonable
information for the three shows. Caution should be exercised when accepting visitor
numbers as these can be inaccurate or misleading as it depends on how numbers
are counted. Numbers can be inflated to attract exhibitors and sponsorship.
Even when information is not fully available, certain assumptions can be safely
made. Visitors are mainly female, around 75%, and the average age falls within the
55-60 bracket. In terms of on-site observation, these figures seem reasonable at all
venues. Most visitors are from what is termed the ABC1 socio-economic group (the
RHS is the only one to apply this standard). This relates to income and job type: C1
such as administrative jobs to A being professional. Information from the
Philadelphia Flower Show is consistent with these figures.
Catchment area is generally around one hour to the show although large shows such
as Hampton Court attract visitors from further away and Chelsea has the highest
percentage of visitors from other parts of the country and overseas, as well as the
highest socio-economic classification. Dig the City is purely local and unlikely to be
attended from beyond the conurbation of Manchester.
Dig the City, only in its second year, has been very successful in attracting children,
one of the few shows to do so. This is due to location, type of exhibits and that the
school holidays had started. However, exhibitors at many shows are not interested
in attracting families as they tend to spend very little at the trade stalls compared to
older visitors.
15
4.3 EXHIBITOR FACTS
There is little information on exhibitors beyond the total number in a show. Giardina
has the most explicit data of any show and one could probably consider that there
are similar data and reasons for other similar shows. Exhibition gardens and floral
displays do not generally have any charge for their site unless they are selling a
product. The exception is Giardina which has a different approach than all of the
other shows and exhibition gardens are charged for the space. Trade stalls are
charged at all venues normally according to size. Figures are not always readily
available for the cost of a site but are normally available when contacting the show
organisers.
Some long standing exhibitors insist on having the same space every year.
According to one exhibitor at the Philadelphia and the show director, the number of
exhibitors has dropped in recent years, particularly for the large show gardens. A
contributing factor has been the economic downturn. While Chelsea seems very full,
the exhibitions seem more conservative and less risk taking then pre-recession days.
Exhibition gardens and floral displays often have financial support from various
sources. More information in the site forms and further in this report under
sponsorship
4.4 LOCATION & FACILITIES
4.4.1 Access: In an overview of all the shows, those that attract the largest numbers
tend to be either in a city centre or within the peri-urban area. This provides easy
access to large numbers of people by both public and private transport. Large scale
parking can be problematic with Chelsea being the most obvious but it is extremely
well-served by public transport systems.
More rural based shows such as Chaumont, Tatton and Schloss Dyck are reliant on
private transport and coach groups. These shows rely more heavily on marketing
strategies, return visitors and reputation to attract high numbers.
4.4.2 Facilities: There are similar supporting facilities between all of the shows:
catering (moderate to high cost), champagne tents, toilets, information points. In
large shows there are normally separate facilities for exhibitors. Further support
services can include traffic management, recycling points, ambulance/first aid
stations. The extent of facilities is dependent on location and scale of show. Where
a show is linked to a house/castle and garden, existing facilities are supported with
additional ones particularly catering and toilets.
16
4.5 EXHIBITIONS AND SHOW GARDENS
Exhibitions can be classified into three groups: floral displays, exhibition gardens and
tradestalls.
4.5.1 Floral displays are normally presented by either growers of specific plants or
societies. These are usually under cover in exhibition halls such as the Keukenhoff
or the indoor shows, or in a marquee to provide protection from the weather. These
are often associated with trade stands as the grower will also sell the plants. Sales
can be from on site or by mail order depending on the site and season. Almost all of
the plants at Chelsea are mail order as there is no room on site to hold stock.
Displays can be simple exhibits where single species are presented such as sweet
peas, or elaborate exhibitions as seen in the RHS shows and the Keukenhof.
Elaborate displays are usually in search of awards. There are strict time limits for
the build and break down periods.
4.5.2 Exhibition gardens have grown in popularity and have become major
features. These are normally self-financed and/or have sponsorship. Proposals are
made to the organising body some months in advance of the show with often strict
guidelines on quality, health and safety, sustainability, recycling, and after use. A
portfolio of work is required by some shows.
Show gardens can be sub-divided into categories in terms of scale or theme and are
often grouped together. Refer to site forms on RHS gardens and Giardina as good
examples
Most require public liability insurance.
Some shows require someone to be at the garden for the full show to meet
the public; this is not always the case with the floral displays.
Large gardens can have between 10-14 days to build the garden while
smaller gardens usually have one week.
RHS shows have very few gardens that visitors can walk through due to
insurance issues although this does not seem to be the case in most other
shows.
There is often support and advice for first time exhibitors
It seems that the prime target for an exhibitor is to receive an award, preferably gold.
This is true of the exhibition gardens and floral displays and is used mainly for
marketing their businesses.
An exhibitor of a show garden at Hampton Court, a commercial garden centre, did
not receive an award but was very pleased with the experience and the public
response and intends to exhibit again.
4.5.3 Trade stalls are economically critical to most shows except where there are
large subsidies usually by regional and local government, or by a specific industry as
17
at the Keukenhof gardens. These stands range from plant sales and garden furniture
to summer houses and green houses. Most shows have non-horticultural trade
stands as well. These can be grouped, but not by theme, and small clusters
scattered throughout the site, or in some cases set up as a shopping street. The
Philadelphia Flower Show is the only one that had a completely separate area for
these.
Most stands simply exhibit their products, some undercover. There are some very
well designed trade stands at the RHS shows as there are awards for the best
stands. This encourages a higher quality exhibition and lifts the feeling above an
outdoor shopping centre.
4.6 ASSOCIATED & PARALLEL EVENTS
Most shows have activities to encourage a broader user base in terms of age and
gender. There is usually good catering which many find as a supporting reason to
attend a show, but there may be competitions such as Lady’s Day (prizes are usually
spa treatment, shopping vouchers) or in Dig the City there was a competition for
children to design a garden. Schloss Dyck offered children the opportunity to build a
miniature garden.
Most venues offer musical entertainment, often through the entire show period.
Some have fashion shows, cookery presentations, gardening presentations, and
flower arranging. Arley has a small classic car show during their two day fair,
although they do not believe this makes a substantial difference in attracting more
male visitors. There was also an art exhibition in the main house. Philadelphia had
the most expansive in-house events with an addition to the activities above they
included an aerial display of acrobats and a butterfly room.
Few shows moved beyond their own display grounds: Arley displayed some modern
art and tours of the gardens were given by the owner and head gardener. Schloss
Dyck used some buildings and associated spaces around the castle for trade stands.
Neither Hampton Court nor Tatton offered a joint ticket to access their gardens. A
missed opportunity for those that have travelled some distance. The
Landesgartenshau in Zülpich offered entry into the local museum for 1€ extra.
The only other show to clearly have links with museums was Philadelphia. There
were a number of museums that supported the show from across the country (details
in site form). The Bank of America, their main sponsor, had loaned several Andy
Warhol paintings for display at the show. One of the exhibition gardens was based
on the Getty Museum gardens in Los Angeles.
18
4.7 AWARDS
The larger shows offer awards, usually gold, silver-gilt, silver and bronze. There may
also be a Best in Show in a particular category such as floral display, garden or trade
stand. Criteria for RHS awards is included within the site forms. There are often
special awards for children or school exhibits; Arley offers the Lady Ashbrook Award.
There are no accepted standards although many shows use the RHS guidelines
which have substantial room for interpretation. Awards can be seen as a key
inducement for exhibitors as they will incorporate it into their marketing.
4.8-4.9 EXHIBITOR TERMS, CONDITIONS AND CONTRACTS
Terms and charges will vary year to year. Some information is contained within the
site reports; however, for up to date information contact the shows management
office.
4.10 SHOW HISTORY
A brief description of the show’s background and development.
4.11 MARKETING
Shows tend to be similar in their use of media with larger shows having a media
partner; this is usually a local/regional newspaper. TV coverage is extensive on
some shows such as Chelsea as garden shows are ideal for TV coverage since they
are visually appealing. Radio is used to promote shows with adverts and in some
cases competitions for free tickets. Lifestyle magazines are heavily used for
marketing. Posters can be found in some city centres, airports and train stations.
Information is usually available in nearby hotels, and sometimes restaurants and
shopping centres.
TV and sport personalities are popular and are often used to present
demonstrations, interviews and give awards. They are often used to host broadcasts
on the show. This helps to raise the profile of the show and attract the public as well
as media attention.
While most shows use social media such as Facebook and Twitter, it is questionable
as to how effective these avenues are. Social media tends to be used by younger
visitors than are seen at the shows. There is no solid analysis of the impact from
different media types on visitor numbers.
There is on-site marketing of sponsors with leaflets and brochures but also
information panels usually provide sponsor details.
19
4.12 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs are accompanied by comments and descriptions to aid in the
understanding of each show, its distinctiveness and in some cases associated
issues. Photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated.
4.13 ORGANISATION & CONTACTS
Head office and supporting organisations and names are given where known. Note
that some are professional event organisers, and some are employed for the show
only.
4.14 SPONSORSHIP
Only the smallest events such as plant fairs and some one-two day events appear to
operate without some form of external sponsorship. Sponsorship exists at different
levels from major financial and in-kind support to local businesses supporting a
garden or floral arrangements. The largest show in terms of scale and cost is the
Landesgartenshau which has large government and industries as its backer. This is
an exceptional case in that the high cost of reclamation can only be met with
government intervention, and that there is a long term after use. All other shows are
temporary although some features may remain or be re-located.
Shows tend to have one or two main sponsors, often a car manufacturer, insurance
company or a bank. There may be a second tier of sponsors as well, or specific
sponsors for a specific event such as a prize, marquee or music event. Philadelphia
seems to have the most comprehensive range of sponsors (details in the site form).
Their two main sponsors’ financial contribution makes up half of their profits.
Show and floral exhibits will often have one or more sponsor; even the smaller
gardens require generous funding. Giardina limits the number of sponsor panels
that can be exhibited with the exhibition. Most shows have criteria for the display of
this type of information.
4.15 ECONOMIC IMPACT
This is nearly impossible to assess as most shows will not release this information.
However, Arley and Schloss Dyck have run their shows for some years at a profit.
Both require additional staff for set up, running and break down. Although this is not
large scale employment, it is beneficial to the local economy.
Giardina is run by an events company, which also manages around 40 other shows
in Switzerland. This is very self-contained with local firms exhibiting and focused on
the local market. As such this contributes to local business and running the
exhibition centre. This is not seen a tourist venue so there is modest impact on the
associated facilities such as hotels and restaurants.
20
The RHS shows do have a major tourist focus and this helps to support local
businesses and increase temporary employment. There is a general feeling from
exhibitors that there are very few, if any, commissions arising from the show even if
they were awarded a gold medal.
The only show that produced supporting financial information was the Philadelphia
Flower Show that claims to make a profit of $1-2 million per show. There financial
analysis impact of the show by KPMG indicates that the show has a $61 million
impact in the Philadelphia area. This will cover not only the direct impact of the show
on local businesses, but a projected impact for the year in terms businesses turnover
and employment in the region. The profits are used within the horticultural society
and to support their activities in the area.
4.16 INTERVIEWS
Three show directors were interviewed: Giardina, Philadelphia and Schloss Dyke.
Members of the management teams from Dig the City, who completed some of the
site form, Arley Garden Festival and the Landesgartenshau were interviewed.
Contact was attempted by phone and email with all RHS sites, the Keukenhof,
Floralie and Chaumont with no response or too busy to speak to anyone.
Points are either incorporated within the site form or listed as key points in section 16
of the site form.
4.17 SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS
Each site has a short list which identifies main features and issues of the show.
These should be read in conjunction with the full site report and not in isolation.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
The subject of garden shows, garden festivals and flower shows is large and
complex. Many conclusions are held within the preceding points and in the site
forms which should be read first. The following points are not in any particular order.
Getting Started
A comprehensive business plan is critical for any size of show
Visit as many shows as possible of similar theme and size
Include not only what happens in a show, but the impact on adjoining areas.
Consultants may be needed in traffic management, health and safety, public
liability insurance
Consider when proposing a new show that there is a supporting and credible
institution to work with as a co-organiser such as a major horticultural society
While shows like Chelsea have an international reputation, consider what can
be achieved within the skill sets, financial resources and suitability of location
21
This gives credibility and allows the use of their reputation, management
skills, marketing connections and expertise
Use an events management company to plan the show, its strategies and
development if you are not experienced
Or, develop slowly from a small plant fair and some special features and learn
while it grows
Rent or jointly purchase tents, marquees and additional structures with other
organisations to share and reduce costs
Situation
An urban or peri-urban event is likely to attract a different range of people in
terms of age, gender and socio-economic level
It appears that the logistics of an indoor event may be easier than an outdoor
event is unlikely to be true
Ideally the site should have good public transport and extensive parking to
encourage a diversity of visitors
Outdoors, a level site will be easier to develop and a sandy loam soil offers
the best opportunity for easy excavation and restoration
Allow sufficient space between exhibits so they can be viewed comfortably
An existing garden/park that has some planting structure can give a good
setting for the display gardens; avoid open fields as a setting
Consider long term strategy to develop walks and garden spaces for future
garden exhibits
Exhibitors
Events need to be tailored to a specific audience
There are mixed messages about children and families coming to the show as
they tend to spend very little; however, these are future spenders
Early contact needed with potential exhibitors to bring on board and discuss
their proposal
Have information packs for exhibitors and a training programme for first time
exhibitors
Start early in attracting sponsors and offer a range of different investment
opportunities to them
Use display boards and stands/tents to provide a uniformity across the site
In larger shows, consider separate areas for exhibitors for food and toilets
Spread exhibition types-floral, trade and gardens-across the site to encourage
full use of the site and reduce congestion
Exhibitors want to win a medal; use a full range of medal colours and types of
exhibitions
Survey exhibitors for their response to the show
22
Visitors
Special events attract different audiences as well return visitors
Each year needs different approach to attract visitors
Provide clear maps and information on site for facilities
Guidebooks tend to be useful for revenue generation, but are seldom used by
most visitors
A range of catering types from low to high cost.
Provide temporary seating and rest spots particularly around catering areas
Install a bank cash machine on site
Hands on activities can encourage children to the show and families to stay
longer
Develop links to other activities in the region, with possible joint tickets, to
urge visitors to remain in the area longer
Use a visitor survey to understand their needs and expectations
Marketing
Explore and use the full range of marketing available from social media to TV
and the use of celebrities
Newspapers, magazines and radio can promote the event through articles
and competitions
Promote the difference from the previous year’s show
Link marketing types to the visitor and exhibitor surveys to determine which
methods are most effective
RHS Tatton Flower Show 2008: Award winning show garden by author
23
Appendices
1: Arley Garden Festival, Cheshire, UK
2: Chaumont, Loire Valley, France
3: Dig the City, Manchester, UK
4: Floralies, Nantes, France
5: Gartenlust Schloss Dyck, nr. Düsseldorf, Germany
6: Giardina, Zurich, Switzerland
7: Keukenhof, Lisse, Holland
8: Landesgartenshau, Zülpich, Germany
9: Nordpark, Düsseldorf, Germany
10: Philadelphia Flower Show, USA
11: RHS Chelsea Flower Show, London, UK
12: RHS Hampton Court Flower Show, Greater London, UK
13: RHS Tatton Flower Show, Cheshire, UK