Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. –...

8
Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar

Transcript of Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. –...

Page 1: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar

Page 2: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

Humanitarian Evaluation (in general)

Metodology (dev. – HA)

Criteria

• Which country and project?

• Which goals?

Page 3: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

Evaluated projects

CZ HumAid in Burma/Myanmar2008-2011

Urgent Assistance 2008

Early recovery (shelter) 2009

Construction of permanent shelters

2010

Livelihood support 2011

Page 4: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

B/M evaluation: the process

- Reflection of expectations(donor, implementing NGO)- Study of available projectdocumentation + hum.eval.metodologies- Mission to the recipientcountry and community– Presentation of findings (B/M, CZ, Brussels)- Implementation

Page 5: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

B/M evaluation: the findings

• Adequate needs assessments and reactions inside HumAid – but missing LRRD.

• Low quality of temporary shelters – but higher quantity of the response.

• Dependence on external assistance: local recipients have small/no resources.

• Political interference: choice of localities for new buildings.

• Insufficient anticipation of long-term Nargis impacts (availability of palm nipa-leaves).

• Difficult evaluation of GHD principles.

Page 6: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

B/M evaluation: follow-up

• Sharing with local recipients, implementing partners and other donors

• Implemention of recommendations

• Learning for further actions + humanitarian evaluations

Page 7: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

CZ v. GHD: learning and accountability

Effective andEfficientimplementation

Evaluations and PerformanceAssessments

Transparent reporting

Page 8: Humanitarian Evaluation: Burma/Myanmar. Humanitarian Evaluation (in general) Metodology (dev. – HA) Criteria Which country and project? Which goals?

Thank you!

Contact: [email protected]+420/224 182 547

www.mzv.cz/pomoc, www.mfa.cz/aid

Any questions?