Human Herpesvirus 6
Transcript of Human Herpesvirus 6
, -
Human Herpesvirus 6
DAVID H. DOCKRELL, M.D.,* THOMAS F. SMITH, PH.D., AND CARLOS V. PAYA, M.D., PH.D.
Human herpesvirus (HHV) 6 is a ~-herpes, DNA virus.This virus shows closest homology with cytomegalovirusand HHV-7. Infection usually occurs in infants 6 to 24months of age, and primary infection may result inroseola. HHV-6 infection in infants is the commonestcause of fever-induced seizures. Infection in adults is seenprimarily in immunocompromised hosts with solid organtransplants or in those with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The virus is capable of pronounced interaction in vitro with cytomegalovirus and human immunodeficiency virus and induces immunosuppression andapoptosis. The importance of these interactions in vivonecessitates further investigation. HHV-6 infection may
The development of molecular-based techniques has ledto the study of the pathogenesis of three new members
of the human herpesvirus (HHV) family. These viruses,labeled HHV 6, 7, and 8 in order of their discovery, havereceived considerable attention during the past decade, anda substantial amount of information has been generatedconcerning their role in causing human disease.
HHV-6 was first isolated in 1986 by Salahuddin andcolleagues.' Its discovery resulted from attempts to isolatenovel viruses in patients with lymphoproliferative disease.The virus was isolated from lymphocytes obtained frompatients with various lymphoproliferative disorders by using methods to activate and maintain lymphocytes in longterm culture. HHV-6 could be transmitted to phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL)but not to transformed cell lines. Analysis of infected cellsrevealed cytopathic changes, unique viral nucleic acid sequences by in situ hybridization, and specific viral antigensby indirect immunofluorescence assay; morphologically,the virus resembled existing herpesviruses. Specific antibody to HHV-6 was identified in all 6 index cases but wasdetected in only 4 of 220 healthy blood donors. Because
From the Division of Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine(D.H.D., C.V.P.). Division of Clinical Microbiology (T.F.S., C.V.P.),and Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine(C.V.P.). Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
*Current address: University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield,United Kingdom.
Address reprint requests and correspondence to Dr. C. V. Paya,Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 FirstStreet SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:163-170 163
contribute to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. HHV6 may be diagnosed by viral culture, serology, or polymerase chain reaction.
Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:163-170
AIDS = acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CMV = cytomegalovirus; EBV =Epstein-Barr virus; EIA =enzyme immunoassay; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; HHV =human herpesvirus; IL = interleukin; LTR = long terminalrepeat; mRNA =messenger RNA; MS =multiple sclerosis;PBL = peripheral blood lymphocytes; PCR = polymerasechain reaction
the infected cells were identified as B lymphocytes, thevirus was labeled human B-celllymphotropic virus.
Despite the initial report, it has become apparent thatHHV-6 is, in reality, a T-celllymphotropic virus." Contrary to the initial report of rare detection of antibody toHHV-6 in healthy blood donors, the virus is ubiquitous andfound worldwide.' Some investigators have suggested thatHHV-6 should be regarded as two separate viruses-HHV6A and HHV-6B-despite the sharing of significant (95%)genomic identity; nevertheless, the two variants have distinctive biologic and epidemiologic characteristics.'
BIOLOGY OF THE VIRUSStructure
HHV-6 is 160 to 200 nm in diameter, contains DNA thatis packaged in a nucleocapsid of 90 to 110 nm in diametercomposed of 162 capsomeres, and is surrounded by anenvelope 20 to 40 nm in thickness.' HHV-6 is a ~-herpes
virus, as are cytomegalovirus (CMV) and HHV-7.5 Theenvelope contains lipoprotein and the glycoproteins, whichare responsible for biologic functions such as binding to thehost cell receptors or acting as the targets for neutralizingantibody. The viral infectivity is inactivated by ether andlipid solvents; multiple freeze-thaw cycles, especially inthe absence of a protein-rich environment, also destroy thephysical integrity of herpesviruses.
GenomeThe viral genome is arranged as a linear segment of
double-stranded DNA and is approximately 160 kbp inlength." The HHV-6 genome consists of a single long
© 1999 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
164 Human Herpesvirus 6 Mayo ClinProc , February 1999, Vol 74
Table I.-Differences Between Human Herpesvirus 6A and 6B*
Characteristic
Growthproperties
Restrictionenzymepatterns
Antigenic profile
Cytopathogenicity
Disease association
HHV-6A
Peripheral blood lymphocytes,transformedT-cell lines
Distinct from HHV-6B
Reactionwith monoclonal antibodiesagainst gp82-105 or p180
Suppression of growthfactor-inducedbone marrow maturation is greaterwithHHV-6A
Primary disease is uncertain, possibledisease in immunocompromised hosts
HHV-68
Peripheral bloodlymphocytes only
Distinctfrom HHV-6A, sequence variationsin terminalrepeat regions determinestrains
No reactionwith monoclonal antibodiesagainst gp82-1 05 or p180,reaction withmonoclonal antibodies against pI01
Less virulent in cell culture
Roseola and reactivation disease inimmunocompromised hosts
*HHV = human herpesvirus.
unique sequence (D) that is flanked by identical directrepeat segments at each end (DRLand DR
R) , resulting in
the arrangement DRL-D-DRR
•i The herpesvirus clea vage
package motifs , pa c-l and pa c-T; are arranged one at eachend in the direct repeat segments so that , during the processof viral replication when the two ends of the linear segmentof DNA unite , a unique junctional element containing pa c2-pa c-l is produced. The guanine and cytosine content ofHHV-6 DNA is 43 to 44%, the lowest of any knownherpesvirus;' no hybridization occurs between the HHV-6genome and other previously described herpesviruses, except for a fragment of the CMV genome, which is homologous with a subgenomic fragment of HHV -6. Furthercomparison of HHV -6 and CMV reveals that the CMVgenome is approximately 50% longer, is more complexwith several gene s lacking counterparts in HHV-6, andcontains a genomic segment that is colinear with a l15-kbfragment of HHV-6.8 The only other herpesvirus thatshares a similar genomic arrangement is HHV-7. Thegenome of the D] 102 strain, an HHV -6A variant, contains119 open reading frames encoding 102 separate proteins. 'The genes encoding the major capsid protein, viral polymerase, glycoproteins gB, gH, and gl., and phosphoproteins have been identified.' The protein virus shows close sthomology to CMV, with 67% prote in homology, and toHHV-7, which shows a 50 to 60% nucleotide identity withHHV-6.
Strain Variation and Cell TropismHHV-6 occurs as two variants, HHV-6A and HHV-6B,
which differ regarding the cell types that can be infected,genomic homology (90 to 96 %) antigen profile,epidemiologic features, and, possibly, cytopathic potential
(Table I) .4,9 The strain originally described by Salahuddinand associates,1 the GS strain, was an HHV -6A variant that ,like the Dll02 strain , has been described in irnmunocompromised adults but not in those with roseola. Thestrain s that have been cultured from cases of roseola are allHHV-6B and include the prototype Z29 strain.
HHV-6 is highly tropic for CD4 T lymphocytes.Growth in primary lymphocytes necessitates stimulationwith phytohemagglutinin and growth in interleukin (IL)-2containing media. 1 HHV -6, however, also infects CD8 Tlymphocytes, natural killer cells, macrophages, megakaryocytes, epithelial cell s, and neural cells. 10,1I The CD4molecule does not seem to be essential for infection of CD4lymphocytes. Antibody to CD4 does not block infection,and HeLa cells expre ssing CD4 are not infected with HHV6.12•13
Viral InteractionsAn important consideration with respect to the biology
of HHV-6 is its potential ability to alter the natural historyof other viral infections by its interaction with these viruses. The interaction may be indirect (HHV-6-inducedimmunosuppression may predi spose to more severe disease when infection occurs with another herpesvirus orhuman immunodeficiency virus [HIV] 14) or direct as occurs in coinfection (HHV-6 and a heterologous virus mayoccur in mixed infections in patients with central nervoussystem infection"). The theoretic basis for these interactions is derived from experiments in vitro. Sequence similarity has been noted between the gB peptide of CMV andHHV -6, but whether this finding has consequence for immunity against these viruses is unknown. 16 A potentialmechanism of interaction between HHV-6 and CMV has
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
Mayo Clin Proc, February 1999, Vol 74
been described for coinfections-the glycoprotein gHlgLhetero-oligomer, which is necessary for infectivity, mayrepresent a heterodimer resulting from a mixture of theCMV glycoproteins gH and gL and the correspondingHHV-6 glycoproteins.'? Therefore, coinfection could haveconsequences on reactivation and cell tropism. Furtherstudies are needed to explore this relationship and also thereports of increased replication of the Epstein-Barr virus(EBV) induced by HHV-6. 18
Similarly, HHV-6 may interact with HIV. A significantcorrelation exists between the frequency and extent ofHHV-6 DNA, as detected by the polymerase chain reaction(PCR) in peripheral blood leukocytes of HIV-seropositivepersons, and the absolute number of CD4 T lymphocytes. 19In vitro, HHV-6 is a potent transactivator of the long terminal repeat (LTR) of HIV, resulting in accelerated HIVreplication in vitro. The HHV-6 responsive elements havebeen mapped to the NF-KB- and Spl-binding sites of theHIV-LTR and function independently from the TAR element (responsive to the HIV transactivator tat), althoughthe addition of tat may be additive in the presence of HHV6.20,21 Conversely, transfected tat leads to increased replication of HHV _6.22 The pCD4I (U27) gene locus of HHV6 encodes an early-late class phosphoprotein, whichtransactivates HIV-LTR. 23 Some investigators, however,have demonstrated that HHV-6 can inhibit HIV replicationin vitro under certain circumstances." A second source ofinteraction may be the ability of HHV-6 to induce CD4messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in cells such as y-8Tlymphocytes, CD8 T lymphocytes, and natural killercells,21,25.26 an outcome that could alter the range of cellsinfected by HIV. A further possible interaction could beindirect because of the cytokine profile produced in response to HHV-6 infection." The potential interactions ofHHV-6 with other herpesviruses and the manner in whichthese in vitro findings translate clinically are intriguingissues that merit further study.
IMMUNITYHumoral immunity occurs promptly after primary infection. In infants with infection, neutralizing antibodies develop 3 to 7 days after the onset of fever.' During thesecond week after infection, IgM antibody peaks and persists for up to 2 months, whereas IgG production peaks at 2to 3 weeks and persists for life in 95% of adults.>" Therelationship of reactivation disease with conditions associated with impaired cell-mediated immunity suggests thatcell-mediated immunity must also be important. Neutralizing antibodies target various proteins, including linear andconformational epitopes of the glycoproteins. Reactivationof HHV-6 infection can also trigger an increase in specificantibody concentration."
Human Herpesvirus 6 165
HHV-6 has important effects on the immune system.Infection of PBL leads to decreased expression of IL-2mRNA after mitogenic stimulation, resulting in an anergicstate in vitro." Whether the alteration in mRNA levels isthe result of decreased production or accelerated degradation is unknown. HHV-6 infection induces secretion oftumor necrosis factor from infected peripheral bloodmononuclear cell cultures," but they are cell-line specific,although alterations in other cytokine levels have beendescribed. In vitro, HHV-6 infection of transformed T-celllines results in death by apoptosis and enhanced susceptibility to Fas-mediated apoptosis," an effect that occurspredominantly in uninfected cells. This observation wassupported by the demonstration that cells undergoingapoptosis had none of the cytologic characteristics of directly infected cells and that they did not stain positive withan anti-HHV-6 antibody. In addition, apoptosis was induced by a virion-free supernatant of HHV-6 infected cells.Therefore, induction of apoptosis in uninfected cells maybe one mechanism by which HHV-6 induces immunosuppression. The combined effect of decreased IL-2levelsand enhanced susceptibility to apoptosis theoretically contributes to the clinical manifestation of HHV-6 infections,including lymphopenia and immunosuppression. The clinical relevance of these phenomena, however, necessitatesclarification.
EPIDEMIOLOGYGeneral Population
HHV-6 seropositivity occurs worldwide and is extremely prevalent; most studies report rates higher than90% in children older than 2 years of age.' Specific maternal antibody protects newborns from HHV-6 infection, andgradual loss of this antibody results in a nadir value ofseropositivity of 10% at 6 months of age. Thereafter,primary HHV-6 infection leads to the development of antibodies, and seropositivity peaks at 2 years of age. Thisinformation correlates with the findings in the Rochester,New York, cohort of pediatric patients infected with HHV6, in whom the peak age for virus isolation was 6 to 9months." The exact mode of transmission has not yet beendetermined, but, in view of the high rates of seropositivity,the virus must be easily transmitted to infants by closehousehold contacts. HHV-6 is shed in saliva and urine.These sources represent likely modes of transmission."The role of breast milk in transmission of HHV -6 infectionhas not been determined. Of interest, seroconversion hasbeen noted in formula-fed infants, a suggestion that breastmilk is not the exclusive means of transmission.'
Seropositivity may decrease with age," but some reports have failed to confirm this hypothesis. Whether theloss of seropositivity with age has clinical significance is
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
166 Human Herpesvirus 6 Mayo Clin Proc, February 1999, Vol 74
Table 2.-Clinical Features of Human Herpesvirus 6*
Population
Pediatric
Adult
Bonemarrow transplantrecipient
Solidorgantransplantrecipient
HIV-seropositive
Symptomatic infections
Roseola infantum (exanthem subitum),rash withoutfever, nonspecific illnesses
Feverwith lymphadenopathy, hepatitis,encephalitis
Fever,rash, cytopenia, hepatitis,? pneumonitis, ? encephalitis
Fever,rash, cytopenia, ? pneumonitis,hepatitis, ? encephalitis
? Pneumonitis, ? encephalitis
Complications
Fever-induced seizures, encephalitis,acutedisseminated demyelination
? MS or otherdemyelinating conditions,? lymphoproliferative syndromes
? Increased severity of CMVdisease
? Increased severity of CMVdisease
? Increased HIV-viralload, ? role inCD4T-celldepletion, ? role in AIDSdementia complex
*AIDS =acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CMV=cytomegalovirus; HIV=humanimmunodeficiency virus; MS=multiple sclerosis.
unclear, as is the role of reactivation in immunocompetentadults. Adults who have not previously experienced HHV6 infection may have development of primary infection asadults, but this situation is rare.
Immunocompromised HostsImmunocompromised patients with solid organ trans
plants are at increased risk of HHV-6 infection. Whetherthis risk results from reactivation of latent infection orsuperinfection is unclear. In addition, some patients whohave remained seronegative during adult life may experience primary infection while they are immunocompromised. Rates of HHV-6 infection vary after transplantation according to the type of solid organ transplant andthe method of detection of infection (viral culture, serology, or PCR). Reported rates of infection are as follows:24 to 31% for liver transplant recipients, 38 to 66% forrenal transplant recipients, 14% for heart transplant recipients, and 38 to 60% for bone marrow transplant recipients(who have been more extensively studied after transplantation than the solid transplant groupS).1O,28,34-37 Transplanted solid organs, blood transfusion, and reactivation ofendogenous virus by immunosuppression have been implicated as risk factors for posttransplantation infection. IO,38,39 In HIV-infected patients, PCR detection ofHHV-6 DNA in CD4 T lymphocytes has been more usefulthan serology for the laboratory diagnosis of acute infection. Its detection correlates with high CD4 T-lymphocytecounts."
CLINICAL FEATURESInfection in Infants
HHV-6 infection is often asymptomatic. Symptomaticdisease occurs predominantly after primary infection ininfants and after either primary or reactivation disease inimmunocompromised adults (Table 2). Most primary in-
fections with HHV-6 occur in children between 6 and 24months of age.' Although many primary infections may besubclinical, several patterns of clinical disease have beendescribed. Yamanishi and coworkers" demonstrated convincingly the etiologic link between HHV-6 infection andthe development of roseola infantum (exanthem subitum orsixth disease). Roseola is characterized by the rapid onsetof high fever lasting 3 to 5 days and by an erythematousmacular or macular-papular rash that occurs after the temperature normalizes. The spectrum of clinical disease ininfants is variable. A report from Rochester, New York,documented HHV-6 viremia in 34 of 243 acutely ill infants(14%) who were 2 years of age or younger and werehospitalized with febrile illness." These infants had highfever, irritability, and inflammation of the tympanic membranes. Of interest, only 3 of the 29 patients (10%) described had the typical rash associated with roseola. In afurther study, 1,653 infants or children younger than 3years of age were prospectively analyzed, and 160 (9.7%)had HHV-6 viremia and seroconversion." In addition tononspecific febrile illness and otitis, the most frequentclinical symptoms were those associated with upper respiratory tract or gastrointestinal involvement. In contrast,infants younger than 6 months of age in whom primaryHHV-6 developed had an illness characterized by lowerfevers, greater irritability, and more gastrointestinal symptoms but a lower frequency of upper or lower respiratorytract disease. HHV-6 infection has been estimated to account for 25% of hospital emergency department visits forinfants 6 to 12 months of age." Of note, of the 160 patientswith primary HHV-6, 21 (13%) had fever-induced seizures, which were often prolonged, and HHV-6 infectionaccounted for one-third of all fever-induced seizures inchildren 2 years of age or younger in one study." Otherneurologic features that are based on strong clinical evidence include a bulging fontanelle and meningoenceph-
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
Mayo Clin Proc, February 1999, Vol 74
alitis. Encephalitis may be focal and may be associatedwith acute demyelination. In addition to fever withoutrash, HHV-6 infection may also develop with a rash as theonly clinical manifestation. HHV -6 infection has beenassociated with a fatal case of fulminant hepatitis occurringin a 3-month-old infant ."
Infection in AdultsEpidemiologic studies suggest that relatively few adults
are seronegative for antibodies to HHV-6; therefore, primary infection in this population is rare. Immunocompetent adults or older children who are seronegative for HHV6 may have development of an infectious mononucleosislike illness with negative test results for EBV or CMV .43
These patients have fever , lymphadenopathy, and hepatitisor encephalitis. After an afebrile illness, they may havebilateral nontender cervical lymphadenopathy," and HHV6 has been suggested to be a cause of Kikuchi 's lymphadenitis, a type of necrotizing lymphadenitis." HHV-6 hasbeen linked to several pathologic conditions, includingEBV-negative Burkitt's lymphoma, follicular large celllymphoma, angioimmunoblastic lymphoma, Hodgkin'slymphoma, Sjogren's syndrome, sarcoidosis, and systemiclupus erythematosus, but whether the isolation of HHV-6from lymphocytes or the detection of antibodies to HHV-6in these conditions reflects an etiologic role for HHV-6 hasnot been determined (this topic has been previously reviewed'). Similar considerations apply to the associationof HHV-6 with chronic fatigue syndrome, Guillain-Barresyndrome, or facial paralysis. In view of the neurotropismand propensity to cause neurologic disease, the associationof HHV-6 with multiple sclerosis (MS) is intriguing andhas been researched more than the other previously mentioned possible neurologic associations in adults. In onestudy, the presence of HHV-6 nuclear staining by immunocytochemistry was seen in oligodendrocytes from patientswith MS but not in control subjects , and the staining waslocated around MS plaques." This finding has been furthersupported by the documentation of increased rates of IgMto HHV-6 and of serum detection of HHV-6 DNA inpatients with relapsing-remitting episodes of MS in contrast to those with chronic, progressive MS or several control groups."
Infection in Immunocompromised HostsHHV-6 infection has been reported with greater fre
quency in immunocompromised adults-namely, solid organ transplant recipients and HIV-infected patients-thanin immunocompetent persons. HHV-6, like all herpesviruses, is capable of reactivating from latency, and thusthese host populations are at particular risk of complications from HHV-6.
Human Herpesvirus 6 167
The clinical feature s ofHHV-6 in solid organ transplantrecipients have recently been reviewed." In general , thepathogenic effects induced by HHV-6 after transplantationcan be divided into two groups : symptoms directly attributable to HHV-6 infection and symptoms due to reactivation of other herpesvirus, especially CMV, which mayresult from HHV-6 infection leading to reactivation of theother virus. Symptomatic disease is more likely to resultfrom primary infection with HHV-6 than from reactivation.In immunocompromised hosts, clinical consequences directly attributable to HHV-6 infection include fever, leukopenia, rash, encephalitis, and interstitial pneumonitis.P'v"In bone marrow and solid organ transplant recipients,HHV-6 viremia may induce bone marrow suppression.w"Furthermore, in vitro studies indicated inhibition ofcolony-forming unit assays in HHV-6, specifically leadingto suppression of leukocyte production. In bone marrowtransplant recipients and patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), high levels of HHV-6DNA in blood are associated with interstitial pneumonitis,but causality has not been completely demonstrated.50
Other clinical features of HHV-6 in immunocompromisedhosts include rash and encephalitis.'? Besides the neurotropism of HHV-6 and the reported associations with MS,HHV-6 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of whitematter demyelination in AIDS dementia complex, with theidentification of active HHV-6 replication at sites of demyelination." Causality, however, has yet to be clearlydemonstrated.
In patients with reactivation infections, HHV-6 infection manifests with isolated fever more frequently thandoes organ-specific disease , but clinical symptoms are often absent ; thus, the principal effect of HHV-6 infection inassociation with solid organ transplantation may resultfrom its potential to exacerbate CMV disease. The clinicalevidence for this outcome is that seroconversion to HHV-6or fourfold increases in HHV-6 antibody levels after transplantation are associated with CMV disease, and HHV-6infection is often symptomatic only when associated withCMV infection. P-" Further work is needed to determinewhether the interaction is induced at the level of viralreplication or whether infection with the two virusesmerely reflects reactivation of both viruses due to severeimmunosuppression.
Similarly, HHV-6 reactivation in HIV-infected patientsis frequently asymptomatic but may have indirect effectson HIV replication. HHV-6 up-regulates the expre ssion ofthe CD4 molecule and increases HIV replication. t-? HHV6 is frequently detected in HIV-infected patients ; it hasbeen etiologically linked with several clinical syndromes,but its most important effects could be due to its interactionwith HIV, through its role as an immunomodulator or
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
168 Human Herpesvirus 6
Test
Table3.-Diagnostic Tests for IdentifyingHuman Herpesvirus 6*
Options
Mayo Clin Proc, February 1999, Vol 74
CultureSerology
Polymerase chainreactionImmunohistochemistry
*HHV =human herpesvirus.
Standard cell culture, shellvialtechniqueIndirect immunofluorescence assay, anticomplement
immunofluorescence assay, enzyme immunoassayCellular sample, acellular sample, semiquantitativeMonoclonal antibody to plOl (HHV-6B), monoclonal
antibody to gp82(HHV-6A)
modifier of HIV replication, and thus enhancement ofHIV-mediated CD4 T-cell depletion (this issue has beenpreviously reviewed"),
DIAGNOSISCulture
Viral culture is the gold standard for detecting HHV-6 inperipheral blood mononuclear cells (Table 3). Peripheralblood mononuclear cells are purified and cocultured withPBL, with cord blood lymphocytes, or, alternatively, byprimary cell cultures in RPMI-1640 medium.' Freshlyprocessed cells from blood specimens should always beused because the virus is labile after freeze-thaw cycles.Inoculated cell cultures are then examined at 3- to 4-dayintervals, beginning 5 to 7 days after infection, and analyzed for specific cytopathic effects. Immunologic confirmation of virus-infected cells should be ascertained byusing indirect immunofluorescence or anticomplement immunofluorescence tests. The specificity of these techniques should be confirmed by using antibodies againstother herpesvirus-infected cells. Isolation by viral culturenecessitates 5 to 21 days (median, 11); an adaptation of thetechnique facilitates rapid detection of virus by the shellvial assay in 1 to 3 days. 10 The technique involves centrifugation of the specimen to facilitate inoculation of host cellsand subsequent immunologic detection in early antigens ofvirus-infected cells. A sensitivity of 86% and a specificityof 100% have been reported for this technique for specimens from solid organ transplant recipients.
SerologyPrimary infection with HHV-6 in immunocompetent
hosts can be demonstrated serologically by seroconversionof IgG from negative to positive or the presence of IgM toHHV-6. A fourfold increase in IgG antibody detected byimmunofluorescence or a 1.6-fold increase in antibodymeasured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) indicates recentinfection; however, distinguishing between primary infection and reactivation under these circumstances may bedifficult. Similarly, the clinical significance of IgM detec-
tion in adults is less clear because IgM may be produced inboth primary and reactivation infections." The indirectimmunofluorescence assay is a sensitive method of antibody detection, and a titer of 1:10 or greater is regarded aspositive, especially when diffuse fluorescence of enlargedcells is noted.
The anticomplement immunofluorescence assay is analternative method. Its potential advantages are that it canreduce nonspecific results due to binding of antibodies toFe receptors on the surface of cells and increase the signalfrom serum with positive results. With this procedure,guinea pig complement is allowed to react with specificantigen-antibody complexes, followed by the addition of afluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody to the C3component of complement. Nonspecific reactions areeliminated because C3 reacts only with immune complexes and not with IgG attached to Fc receptors. Thespecificity of the technique has been illustrated by its ability to detect the same percentage of infected cells as electron microscopy. 53
With the aforementioned assays, the slides must be readby a technologist experienced with immunofluorescenceassays. Because review is operator dependent, results maylack objectivity. In general, EIA techniques are moreeasily quantified and less subjective. An EIA protocolhas been developed for the laboratory diagnosis of HHV6 infection. As originally described, the assay is specific,with no competitive cross-reactions with other herpesviruses and loss of 90% of the binding activity by adsorption with soluble HHV-6 antigen." The difficulty withthis assay has been that the results are distributed withina normal distribution curve without a bimodal distribution representing positive and negative results. Establishing a cutoff value to define positive results is thereforedifficult.
Polymerase Chain ReactionPCR can be performed on either cellular or acellular
specimens to detect HHV-6 target DNA. If peripheralblood mononuclear cells are used, distinguishing active
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
Mayo Clin Proc, February 1999,Vol 74
from latent infection is difficult, and ideally a quantitativetechnique for determining the copy number (viral load) ofthe virus should be used; however, these techniques are stillinvestigational.P Some investigators have suggested thatthe use of acellular samples will be more helpful in distinguishing between these two situations, particularly inimmunocompromised hosts.'? Secchiero and colleagues"described a sensitive technique for the detection of HHV-6in serum. Two sets of nested primers are used: the firstderived from the major capsid protein gene and the secondfrom the putative large tegument protein. After HHV-6DNA is amplified with the outer primer pair, an aliquot ofthe PCR product is then used as a target to generate anamplicon internal to the original product by using a secondprimer pair. Amplified DNA is visualized by performingelectrophoresis with use of a 2% agarose gel and stainingwith ethidium bromide. The PCR procedure described issensitive for several HHV -6 strains and does not result in apositive signal from cells infected with other herpesviruses,including HHV-7. Healthy adults have no detectable viralDNA, but children with roseola and a variety ofimmunocomprornised patients yield positive PCR results.The technique facilitates semiquantification and straincharacterization by using a primer set mapping to a polymorphic region of DNA.
ImmunohistochemistryImmunohistochemical tests can be performed on forma
lin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues with use of murinemonoclonal antibodies against the structural protein plOlof HHV-6B or against glycoprotein gp82 of HHV-6A. 1O
Only cells with active infection, in contrast to latent infection, stain positively with these antibodies. This techniquefacilitates identification of HHV-6 in a biopsy or cytologicspecimen within 1 to 3 days after collection. The techniqueis easily performed in any pathology department.'?
SummaryHHV-6 infection can be diagnosed with any of the
previously mentioned techniques. Monoclonal antibodiesare commercially available for use in these applications.The application of these reagents to viral culture andserologic diagnosis is operator dependent, however, andexperience with these procedures facilitates interpretation. PCR-based techniques are additional valuable research tools. Primary infection during infancy is a clinicaldiagnosis that can be confirmed by serology, if necessary. In immunocompromised hosts, HHV-6 infection isbest documented by one of the other methods described.PCR or rapid shell vial are suitable tests with serumsamples, whereas immunostaining is beneficial with biopsy specimens.
Human Herpesvirus 6 169
THERAPYBecause HHV-6 is similar to CMV, the spectrum ofantivirals with activity against this virus is similar.'? Invitro, ganciclovir and foscarnet have good activity, but thevirus is relatively resistant to acyclovir. Nevertheless, therole of antiviral therapy for HHV-6 infection has yet to bedetermined. In transplant recipients, investigators havesuggested that those with evidence of hepatitis,pneumonitis, or encephalitis and positive results of a diagnostic test for HHV-6 should receive therapy;'? however,HHV-6 is often encountered in association with a secondpathogen or with graft rejection, and thus management ofthese cases is complex. Therapy is usually unnecessary foruncomplicated primary infections in immunocompetentpatients.
REFERENCES1. Salahuddin SZ, Ablashi DV, Markham PD, Josephs SF, Sturzenegger
S, Kaplan M, et al. Isolation of a new virus, HBLV, in patients withIymphoproliferative disorders. Science 1986;234:596-601
2. Ablashl DV, Salahuddin SZ, Josephs SF, Imam F, Lusso P, Gallo RC,et al. HBLV (or HHV-6) in human cell lines [letter]. Nature1987;329:207
3. Oren I, Sobel JD. Human herpesvirus type 6: review. Clin Infect Dis1992;14:741-746
4. Dewhurst S. Newlydiscovered human herpesviruses (HHV-6 and HHV7). Curr Opin Infect Dis 1994;7:238-245
5. Robinson WS. Human herpesvirus 6. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis1994;14:159-169
6. Josephs SF, Salahuddin SZ, Ablashl DV, Schachter F, Wong·Staal F,Gallo Re. Genomic analysis of the human B-Iymphotropicvirus (HBLV).Science 1986;234:601-603
7. Gompels UA, Nicholas J, Lawrence G, Jones M, Thomson BJ, MartinMED, et al. The DNA sequence of human herpesvirus-6: structure,coding content, and genome evolution. Virology 1995;209:29-51
8. Efstathlou S, Gompels UA, Craxton MA, Honess RW, Ward K. DNAhomology between a novel human herpesvirus (HHV-6) and humancytomegalovirus [letter]. Lancet 1988;1:63-64
9. Schirmer EC, Wyatt LS, Yamanlshi K, Rodriguez WJ, Frenkel N.Differentiation between two distinct classes of viruses now classifiedas human herpesvirus 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:59225926
10. Singh N, Carrigan DR. Human herpesvirus-6 in transplantation: anemerging pathogen. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:1065-1071
11. Ablashi DV, Lusso P, Hung CL, Salahuddln SZ, Josephs SF, Llana T, etal. Utilization of human hematopoietic cell lines for the propagationand characterization of HBLV (human herpesvirus 6). Int J Cancer1988;42:787-791
12. Lusso P, Gallo RC, DeRocco SE, Markham PD. CD4 is not themembrane receptor for HHV-6 [letter]. Lancet 1989;1:730
13. Pellett PE, Black JB, Yamamoto M. Human herpesvirus 6: the virusand the search for its role as a human pathogen. Adv Virus Res1992;41:1-52
14. Takasaki T, Ohkawa N, sano K, Morlmatsu S, Nakano T, Nakai M, etal. Electronmicroscopic study of human herpesvirus 6-infected humanT cell iines superinfected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1.Acta Virol 1997;41:221-229
15. Tang YW, Espy MJ, Persing DH, Smith TF. Molecular evidence andclinical significance of herpesvirus coinfection in the central nervoussystem. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:2869-2872
16. Chou S, Marousek GI. Homology of the envelope glycoprotein B ofhuman herpesvirus-6 and cytomegalovirus. Virology 1992;191:523528
17. Anderson RA, L1u DX, Gompels UA. Definition of a human herpesvirus6 betaherpesvirus-specific domain in glycoprotein gH that governsinteraction with glycoprotein gL: substitution of human cytomegalovirus glycoproteins permits group-specific compiex formation. Virology1996;217:517-526
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
170 Human Herpesvirus 6
18. Aamand L, Stefanescu I, Ablashl DV, Menezes J. Activation of theEpstein-Barr virus replicative cycle by human herpesvirus 6. J Virol1993;67:6768-6777
19. Fairfax MR, Schacker T, Cone RW, Collier AC, Corey L. Humanherpesvirus 6 DNA in blood cells of human immunodeficiency virusinfected men: correlation of high levels with high CD4 cell counts. JInfect Dis 1994;169:1342-1345
20. Lusso P, Ensoll B, Markham PD, Ablashl DV, Salahuddln SZ,Tschachler E, et al. Productive dual infection of human CD4+ Tlymphocytes by HIV-1and HHV-6. Nature 1989;337:370-373
21. Levy JA, Ferro F, Greenspan D, Lennette ET. Frequent isolation ofHHV-6 from saliva and high seroprevalence of the virus in the population. Lancet 1990;335:1047-1050
22. Sieczkowskl 'L,Chandran B, Wood C. The human immunodeficiencyvirus tat gene enhances replication of human herpesvirus-6. Viralogy1995;211:544-553
23. Zhou Y, Chandran B, Wood C. Transcriptional patterns of thepCD41 (U27) locus of human herpesvirus 6. J Virol 1997;71:34203430
24. Levy JA, Landay A, Lennette ET. Human herpesvirus 6 inhibits humanimmunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in cell culture. J CUnMicrobiol 1990;28:2362-2364
25. Lusso P, Malnati MS, Garzino-DemoA, Crowley RW, Long EO, GalloRC. Infection of natural killer cells by human herpesvirus 6. Nature1993;362:458-462
26. Lusso P, Garzlno-DemoA, Crowley RW, Malnatl MS. Infection of YloT lymphocytes by human herpesvirus 6: transcriptional induction ofCD4 and susceptibility to HIV infection. J Exp Med 1995;181:13031310
27. Yamanlshl K, Okuno T, Shlraki K, Takahashi M, Kondo T, Asano Y, etal. Identification of human herpesvirus-6 as a causal agent forexanthem subitum. Lancet 1988;1:1065-1067
28. Herbein G, Strasswimmer J, Altieri M, Woehl-Jaegle ML, Wolf P,Obert G. Longitudinal study of human herpesvirus 6 infection in organtransplant recipients. CUn Infect Dis 1996;22:171-173
29. Flamand L, Gosselin J, Stefanescu I, Ablashl 0, Menezes J. Immunosuppressive effect of human herpesvirus 6 on T-cell functions:suppression of interleukin-2 synthesis and cell proliferation [publishederratum appears in Blood 1995;86:418]. Blood 1995;85:12631271
30. Aamand L, Gosselin J, D'Addarlo M, Hiscott J, Ablashi DV, Gallo RC,et al. Human herpesvirus 6 induces lnterleukln-IB and tumor necrosisfactor alpha, but not interleukin-6, in peripheral blood mononuclear cellcultures. J Viral 1991;65:5105-5110
31. Inoue Y, Yasukawa M, FuJita S. Induction of T-cell apoptosis byhuman herpesvirus 6. J Viral 1997;71:3751-3759
32. Hall CB, Long CE,Schnabel KC, Caserta MT, Mcintyre KM, CostanzoMA, et al. Human herpesvirus-6 infection in children: a prospectivestudy of complications and reactivation. N Eng)J Med 1994;331:432438
33. Brown NA, Sumaya CV, L1u CR, Ench Y, Kovacs A, Coronesi M, et al.Fall in human herpesvirus 6 seropositivity with age [letter]. Lancet1988;2:396
34. Dockrell DH, Prada J, Jones MF, Patel R, Badley AD, Harmsen WS, etal, Seroconversion to human herpesvirus 6 following liver transplantation is a marker of cytomegalovirus disease. J Infect Dis 1997;176:1135-1140
35. Okuno T, Higashi K, Shiraki K, Yamanishi K, Takahashi M, Kokado Y,et al. Human herpesvirus 6 infection in renal transplantation. Transplantation 1990;49:519-522
36. Merlino C, Glacchino F, Segoloni GP, Ponzi AN. Human herpesvirus-6infection and renal transplantation [letter]. Transplantation1992;53:1382-1383
Mayo Clin Proc, February 1999, Vol 74
37. Robert C, Agut H, Lunel-Fabianl F, Leger P. Infection a herpesvirushumain-6 et hepatite chez ies trans piantes cardiaques. Presse Med1994;23:1209-1210
38. Ward KN, GrayJJ, Efstathiou S. Brief report: primary human herpesvirus 6 infection in a patient following liver transplantation from aseropositive donor. J Med Viral 1989;28:69-72
39. Jacobs U, Ferber J, Klehr HU, Severe allograft dysfunction after OKT3-induced human herpes virus-6 reactivation. Transplant Proc1994;26:3121
40. Pruksananonda P, Hall CB, Insel RA, Mcintyre K, Pellett PE, LongCE, et at, Primary human herpesvirus 6 infection in young children. NEngl J Med 1992;326:1445-1450
41. Hall CB. Human herpesviruses at sixes, sevens, and more [editorial].Ann Intern Med 1997;127:481-483
42. Asano Y, Yoshikawa T, Suga S, Yazakl T, Kondo K, Yamanishi K.Fatal fulminant hepatitis in an infant with human herpesvirus-6 infection [letter]. Lancet 1990;335:862-863
43. Akashi K, Elzuru Y, Sumiyoshl Y, Mlnematsu T, Hara S, Harada M, etal, Brief report: severe infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome andprimary human herpesvirus 6 infection in an adult. N Engl J Med1993;329:168-171
44. Niederman JC, Liu CR, Kaplan MH, Brown NA. Clinical and serologicalfeatures of human herpesvirus-6 infection in three adults. Lancet1988;2:817-819
45. Eizuru Y, Minematsu T, Mlnamlshlma Y, Kikuchi M, Yamanlshl K,Takahashi M, et al. Human herpesvirus 6 in lymph nodes [letter].Lancet 1989;1:40
46. Challoner PB, Smith KT, Parker JO, MacLeod DL, Coulter SN, RoseTM, et al. Plaque-associated expression of human herpesvirus 6 inmultiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:7440-7444
47. Soldan SS, Berti R, Salem N, Secchlero P, Flamand L, Calabresl PA,et al. Association of human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) with multiplesclerosis: increased tgM response to HHV-6 early antigen and detection of serum HHV-6 DNA. Nat Med 1997;3:1394-1397
48. Drobyski WR, Dunne WM, Burd EM, Knox KK, Ash RC, Horowitz MM,et al. Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) infection in allogeneic bonemarrow transplant recipients: evidence of a marrow-suppressive rolefor HHV-6in vivo. J Infect Dis 1993;167:735-739
49. Singh N, Carrigan DR, Gayowski T, Marino IR. Human herpesvirus-6infection in liver transplant recipients: documentation of pathogenicity. Transplantation 1997;64:674-678
50. Cone RW, Hackman RC, Huang M-LW, Bowden RA, Meyers JD,Metcalf M, et al. Human herpesvirus 6 in lung tissue from patientswith pneumonitis after bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med1993;329:156-161
51. Knox KK, Carrigan DR. Active human herpesvirus (HHV-6) infection ofthe centrai nervous system in patients with AIDS. J Acquir ImmuneDefic Syndr Hum Retroviroi 1995;9:69-73
52. Lusso P, Gallo RC. Human herpesvirus 6 in AIDS. Lancet 1994;343:555-556
53. LopezC, Pellett P, Stewart J, Goldsmith C, Sanderlin K, Black J, et al.Characteristics of human herpesvirus-6. J Infect Dis 1988;157:12711273
54. Saxinger C, Polesky H, Eby N, Grufferman S, Murphy R, Tegtmelr G,et al. Antibody reactivity with HBLV(HHV-6)in U.S. populations. J ViralMethods 1988;21:199-208
55. Secchiero P, Zelia D, Crowley RW, Gallo RC, Lusso P. QuantitativePCR for human herpesviruses 6 and 7. J Clin Microbiol1995;33:2124-2130
56. Secchiero P, Carrigan DR, Asano Y, Benedetti L, Crowley RW,Komaroff AL, et al. Detection of human herpesvirus 6 in plasma ofchildren with primary infection and immunosuppressed patients bypolymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis 1995;171:273-280
For personal use. Mass reproduce only with permission from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.