Human Factors Roundtable Event - Improvement Academy · Roundtable Event Met Suite, Leeds...
Transcript of Human Factors Roundtable Event - Improvement Academy · Roundtable Event Met Suite, Leeds...
e: [email protected]/ t: 01274 383926
www.improvementacademy.org Or visit our Academy Office: Bradford Institute for Health Research
Temple Bank House / Duckworth Lane / Bradford / BD9 6RJ
Human Factors Roundtable Event
Met Suite, Leeds Metropolitan Hotel
13th January 2016
Part of the Yorkshire & Humber AHSN
e: [email protected]/ t: 01274 383926
www.improvementacademy.org Or visit our Academy Office: Bradford Institute for Health Research
Temple Bank House / Duckworth Lane / Bradford / BD9 6RJ
Part of the Yorkshire & Humber AHSN
Welcome
Professor John Wright
Housekeeping
Twitter hashtag
#humanfactors
Morning Programme
10:20 The concept of human factors – Gerry Armitage
10:50 Mapping the terrain of human factors – Debbie Clark
11:20 Refreshment Break
11:35 Optimising safe performance – Rebecca Lawton
12:15 Human factors education – Debbie Clark/ Wayne Robson
13:00 Lunch
#humanfactors
Afternoon Programme
13:45 Open Space – Whole Group
15:30 Gina’s Story – Lee Cutler
16:15 Next Steps – Debbie Clark
16:30 Close
#humanfactors
Community of Practice on Human Factors
Invitation to explore your interest in developing and/or participating in a CoP on Human Factors
Join and explore the CCN Network HERE
www.ia-cocreationnetwork.com
Follow on Twitter @CCNetworkcom #CCNetwork
Introductions
#humanfactors
The concept of Human Factors
Professor Gerry Armitage University of Bradford and
Bradford Institute for Health Research
#humanfactors
Plan
• Two illustrations
• Definitions
• Further reading
#humanfactors
Agincourt October 25th 1415
#humanfactors
Agincourt October 25th 1415
• Local conditions
• Skill mix
• Equipment
• Team or organisational culture
#humanfactors
A more recent series of medication errors – 2011-12
• Penicillin to known penicillin-allergic patients
• Involuntary automaticity; double checking
• ‘Business rounds’
• Whole team responsibility
#humanfactors
International Ergonomics Association (IEA) defines (ergonomics or) human factors as:
‘..concerned with the ..interactions among
humans and other elements of a system, and applies theory, principles, data, and other methods to design in order to optimize human well-being and overall system performance’
#humanfactors
Clinical Human Factors
‘enhancing clinical performance through an understanding of the effects of teamwork, tasks, equipment, workspace, culture and organisation on human behaviour and abilities, and application of that knowledge in clinical settings’ Ken Catchpole, 2010
#humanfactors
• Russ AL et al. The Science of Human Factors: separating fact from fiction. BMJ Quality and Safety 00 1-7. 2012
• Dekker S. Patient Safety: a human Factors approach. CRC/Taylor and Francis. 2011
Further reading
#humanfactors
Mapping the terrain of Human Factors
#humanfactors
Debbie Clark
Session Overview
• Look at range of HF applications in healthcare
• Case study of applying some of these applications in Rotherham A&E Department
• Table exercise on applying HF in you own ward, department or organisation
#humanfactors
#humanfactors
#humanfactors
Rotherham A&E Example
• Rotherham A&E – a typical District General Hospital A&E with 70,000 patients per year
• Over a year ago, a number of standard safety mechanisms and
some simulation training were in place • Consultant working with two Simulation Fellows decided to:
– take an overview of the existing situation from an HF viewpoint
– look at the opportunities for incorporating more HF principles to improve patient safety
#humanfactors
Rotherham - Existing Situation
Training Working Practices Quality and Risk Management
Standard text = existing
In situ Simulation
Monthly 2hr rolling program
1/2hr quality improvement
session
Human Factors
Training
Simulation as above
Simulation Courses
Multidisciplinary: CRUMPET
EM trainees: ACCS, CT3 paeds
and ST4 courses
Simulation Faculty
Policies
Escalation guidelines
Clinical Guidelines:
- Regular updates
-Emergency guidelines on
wall in resus: cardiac arrest,
trauma team etc.
Handover, briefing
and debriefing
Checklists
Guided by risk assessment:
Sedation, sepsis
Actions from incidents
Improvement actions: checklists,
guidelines, in situ sim, audit
Feedback to staff, M and M
meetings
Quality and Safety
Metrics
CEM Audit Program
TARN
Mortality review:
Incident reports
Potential HF Interventions
Training Working Practices Quality and Risk Management
In situ Simulation
Monthly 2hr rolling program
Weekly 1/2hr quality
improvement session
Mock Arrest
Human Factors
Training
Simulation as above
E learning module
Workshops
Teamwork Training and
Handbook: Team STEPPS
Safety Notices and posters
HF Work Based Assessment
Simulation Courses
Multidisciplinary: CRUMPET
EM trainees: ACCS, CT3 paeds
and ST4 courses
Simulation Faculty
Policies
Escalation guidelines
Clinical Guidelines:
- Regular updates
-Emergency guidelines on
wall in resus: cardiac arrest,
trauma team etc.
Senior review guideline
Handover, briefing
and debriefing
Formal handovers using tool
Safety briefing (daily)
Debrief following incidents
Checklists
Guided by risk assessment:
Sedation, sepsis, first fit,
discharge etc.
Weekly 1/2hr quality
improvement session
Actions from incidents
Improvement actions: checklists,
guidelines, posters, in situ sim,
briefing, audit
Feedback to staff: lesson of the
week, summary information, M and
M meetings
Must reduce risk whilst balancing
unintended consequences
Quality and Safety
Metrics
CEM Audit Program
TARN
Mortality review: avoidable deaths
Incident reports including harm/no
harm ratio
Safety attitude survey
Pneumonia care bundle audit
Quality and Safety Suggestions Box
Progress
Training Working Practices Quality and Risk Management
In situ Simulation
Monthly 2hr rolling program
Weekly 1/2hr quality
improvement session
Mock Arrest
Human Factors
Training
Simulation as above
E learning module
Workshops
Teamwork Training and
Handbook: Team STEPPS
Safety Notices and posters
HF Work Based Assessment
Simulation Courses
Multidisciplinary: CRUMPET
EM trainees: ACCS, CT3 paeds
and ST4 courses
Simulation Faculty
Policies
Escalation guidelines
Clinical Guidelines:
- Regular updates
-Emergency guidelines on
wall in resus: cardiac arrest,
trauma team etc.
Senior review guideline
Handover, briefing
and debriefing
Formal handovers using tool
Safety briefing (daily)
Debrief following incidents
Checklists
Guided by risk assessment:
Sedation, sepsis, first fit,
discharge etc.
Weekly 1/2hr quality
improvement session
Actions from incidents
Improvement actions: checklists,
guidelines, posters, in situ sim,
briefing, audit
Feedback to staff: lesson of the
week, summary information, M and
M meetings
Must reduce risk whilst balancing
unintended consequences
Quality and Safety
Metrics
CEM Audit Program
TARN
Mortality review: avoidable deaths
Incident reports including harm/no
harm ratio
Safety attitude survey
Pneumonia care bundle audit
Quality and Safety Suggestions Box
Conclusion
• There is some HF thinking behind a number of existing practices. This HF component can be increased
• There are opportunities to introduce new HF focussed
practices such as checklists, culture surveys and safety huddles
• Don’t try to do everything - use a survey, incident
reports and other intelligence to choose a few key interventions to focus on
#humanfactors
Table Exercise
• Look at ‘HF methods and applications’ handout
• Consider what you are currently doing in your Ward/Department/Trust (5mins)
• Consider HF areas you could/should/must move into (5mins)
• Feedback from tables (5mins)
#humanfactors
Refreshments and Networking
#humanfactors
Optimising safe performance through research
Professor Rebecca Lawton
#humanfactors
Improving patient care
safety?
Assumptions that underpin our work
• Every human being is fallible
• Certain conditions make fallibility more likely
• Not only do we fail unintentionally, we intentionally deviate from prescribed practice
• Only a tiny minority of people engage in deliberate sabotage
• Our work focuses on optimising the conditions and supporting staff to do the right thing
#humanfactors
What does safe performance look like?
• Full compliance with evidence based protocols/guidelines - • Error free practice
• A team who question and seek to improve
• A state of continuous monitoring and responding to local
circumstances……. RESILIENCE
• A team who are happy, support one another and strive to deliver patient-centred care
#humanfactors
The Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework (Lawton et al., 2012)
Lawton e
Supporting staff to do the safe thing
A behaviour change approach
#humanfactors
An example: The case of nasogastric tubes
• Audit September 2005-March 2010 of incidents relating to misplaced nasogastric tubes
• 2011 NPSA issued a patient safety alert on the safe use of nasogastric tubes
#humanfactors
Domain Meaning
Knowledge Does the person know they should be doing behaviour X? Do they understand the evidence?
Skills Does the person know how to do the behaviour (X)? How easy or difficult does the person find behaviour?
Beliefs about capabilities
How easy is it for the person to do X? Have they previously encountered problems? How confident are they that they can overcome difficulties?
Motivation and goals
How much do they want to do X? How much do they feel the need to do X? Are there incentives to do X? Are there competing priorities?
Environment To what extent do physical or resource factors hinder X? Are there any competing tasks or time constraints?
Beliefs about consequences
What do they think will happen if they do X? What are the costs/consequences of doing X? Does the evidence suggest that doing X is a good thing?
Emotion Does doing X evoke an emotional response? To what extent do emotional factors help or hinder X? How does emotion affect X?
Social influences To what extent do social influences help or hinder X? Will the person observe others doing X?
Role/identity How much is doing X part of the person’s identity? How much doing X important to the person?
Memory/attention Can the person remember to do behaviour X? Do they usually do X?
Action planning Does the person put plans in place to ensure they do the behaviour?
#humanfactors
Involve stakeholders
Medical directors and
sharp end staff
Identify target
behaviour
Audit and discussion
Identify barriers
Influences on Patient Safety
Behaviours Questionnaire
(IPSBQ)
Confirm barriers and generate intervention
strategies
Focus groups
Support staff to implement and
evaluate intervention
Joint approach
Re-auditing
Healthcare professionals not using pH as the first line method for checking tube position
Using Theories of Behaviour change to optimise safe behaviour (Taylor et al., 2013a,b)
#humanfactors
The evaluation
• Funded through the Health Innovation and Education Cluster and strategic authority funding
• Four Trusts in Yorkshire and Humber volunteered to take part in a study to support the implementation of NPSA alerts
• Three chose to focus on safe use of nasogastric tubes as one of two priorities (others were safe use of midazolam, medicines reconcilliation)
• 18 month project, funded one RF and one RN to support audit
#humanfactors
Focus group results: interventions matched to barriers and BCTs (H1)
Barrier Strategy Behaviour change technique*
Social
influences
• Information presented at clinical governance
meetings by experts in the area
• Awareness day held within the Trust
• Posters with pictures of senior staff performing
correct behaviour
• Persuasive source
• Information about health
consequences, and social/
environmental consequences
• Prompts, cues, social support
(unspecified)
Emotion • Screensaver contained messages to elicit
anticipated regret and to reframe perspective on
behaviour
• Anticipated regret
• Salience of consequences
• Framing/reframing
Environmental
context and
resources
• Radiology and ward protocols to empower staff
• Instructions, flow chart, measurement tool, who
placed NG, place to record pH values, etc.
• Splashscreen placed on intranet with prompt about
pH testing and link to all relevant documentation
• Prompts, triggers, cues
• Adding objects to the
environment
Bcap (and
knowledge and
skills)
• Practical training complete for current FY1s
• E-learning package developed for junior doctors
• Instruction on how to perform a
behaviour
• Behavioural practice/rehearsal
Optimising Safe Performance
Audit information
Hospital 1 Hospital 2 Hospital 3 Hospital 4
(Control)
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
Number of sets of notes
audited 49 48 43 44 44 40 53 46
pH of aspirate from stomach 18% 63% 12% 73% 14% 33% 45% 46%
Patient sent for X-ray 49% 23% 77% 9% 41% 40% 25% 20%
Tube placed in radiology 0 0 0 0 36% 10% 0 0
Information not documented 33% 14% 11% 18% 9% 17% 30% 34%
Target behaviour: Using pH as the first line method for checking tube position
#humanfactors
Relevant publications
Taylor, N., Parveen, S., Robins, V., Slater, B., & Lawton, R. (2013). Development and initial validation of the influences on patient safety behaviours questionnaire. Implementation Science, 8(1), 81. Taylor, N., Lawton, R., Slater, B., & Foy, R. (2013). The demonstration of a theory-based approach to the design of localized patient safety interventions. Implementation Science, 8(1), 123. Dyson, J., Lawton, R., Jackson, C., & Cheater, F. (2013). Development of a theory-based instrument to identify barriers and levers to best hand hygiene practice among healthcare practitioners. Implement Sci, 8, 111. Taylor, N., Lawton, R., Moore, S., Craig, J., Slater, B., Cracknell, A., ... & Mohammed, M. A. (2014). Collaborating with front-line healthcare professionals: the clinical and cost effectiveness of a theory based approach to the implementation of a national guideline. BMC health services research, 14(1), 648.
#humanfactors
Generating impact
• Why behaviour change for safety – a short animation Achieving Behaviour Change film
• Resources for healthcare teams available via the Improvement Academy for Yorkshire and Humber website
• One day behaviour change workshops (attended by 300 health professionals and managers in Y&H)
• Four national workshops in 2015 sponsored by NHS IQ
#humanfactors
Safe performance from the patients perspective
Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE)
#humanfactors
Developing PRASE: Collecting patient feedback
Patient Measure of Safety
44-item questionnaire: • Communication • Equipment & supplies • Ward layout • Delays • Access to resources • Staff training • Information flow • Organisation/ care planning • Staff roles & responsibilities
Patient Incident Reporting Tool
•What happened, where and who was involved? •WHY was this a safety concern for them? •What can be done to PREVENT it happening again? •Patient’s perspective on preventability and severity
Example items from the PMOS
#humanfactors
The PRASE Intervention Cycle?
Patient Measure of Safety Patient Incident Reporting Tool
Patient experience of
safety measured
Information collated and fed back to
wards
Feedback considered in
Action Planning Group
Action Planning Group - plan, implement,
monitor changes
Mid-Point Meeting
Start up Meeting
SUMMARY REPORT - Overall safety profile from questionnaire responses
#humanfactors
The Evaluation
Feedback collected from 25 patients on 33 wards across 3 hospital Trusts:
Feedback collected 3 times over 18 months
17 intervention wards met to consider patient feedback and action plan to improve patient safety, quality and experience
Effectiveness = improvements to patient feedback scores over time, more positive safety culture and higher %harm free care
scores #humanfactors
• A - Discard the issue
• B - Do something about the issue (within current constraints)
• C - Challenge the underlying causes of the issue (cultural, physical or structural)
Issue e.g. noise at night
A
B
C
Time taken to ‘resolve’ issue
Action planning meeting analysis – what do teams ‘do’ with feedback?
#humanfactors
Findings
• Patients very happy to provide feedback – 86% response rate, but measure quite challenging for some
• Fidelity of intervention poor – only 4 of 17 wards met as a multi-disciplinary team on both occasions, made an action plan and implemented it
• No significant effect of the intervention on % harm free care, although larger difference in pre-post scores (5.3%) for those wards who implemented PRASE
• So, promising results although more work needed to support implementation
• NEXT STEPS
#humanfactors
What are the next steps for roll out of PRASE?
•A 33 item and 10 item PMOS measure currently being developed http://yqsr.org/impact/
#humanfactors
Relevant Publications
• Lawton, R., McEachan, R. R., Giles, S. J., Sirriyeh, R., Watt, I. S., & Wright, J. (2012). Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2011.
• Ward, J. K., & Armitage, G. (2012). Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ quality & safety, 21(8), 685-699.
• McEachan, R. R., Lawton, R. J., O’Hara, J. K., Armitage, G., Giles, S., Parveen, S., Watt, I. S., & Wright, J. (2013). Developing a reliable and valid patient measure of safety in hospitals (PMOS): a validation study. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2013.
• Giles, S. J., Lawton, R. J., Din, I., & McEachan, R. R. (2013). Developing a patient measure of safety (PMOS). BMJ quality & safety, 22(7), 554-562.
• Lawton, R., O'Hara, J. K., Sheard, L., Reynolds, C., Cocks, K., Armitage, G., & Wright, J. (2015). Can staff and patient perspectives on hospital safety predict harm-free care? An analysis of staff and patient survey data and routinely collected outcomes. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2014.
#humanfactors
Knowing what safe looks like at the individual, team and service level
A positive deviance approach
#humanfactors
Positive deviance – what is it?
Spot it
Understand it
Disseminate it
#humanfactors
Four projects currently underway
1. Elderly care wards across Yorkshire and Humber
2. Hip and knee replacement services across Yorkshire and Humber
3. GP surgeries who do well across 8 QOF targets
4. Healthcare professionals who have won Health Service Journal award for innovation in 2014 or 2015
#humanfactors
Aims
• To develop robust methods for identifying positive deviants
• To develop methods for understanding what it is that they do to achieve success
• To consider the extent to which it is possible to spread success
#humanfactors
Relevant publications
• Lawton, R., Taylor, N., Clay-Williams, R., & Braithwaite, J. (2014). Positive deviance: a different approach to achieving patient safety. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2014.
• Baxter, R., Taylor, N., Kellar, I., & Lawton, R. (2015). What methods are used to apply positive deviance within healthcare organisations? A systematic review. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2015
• Baxter, R., Taylor, N., Kellar, I., & Lawton, R. (2015). Learning from positively deviant wards to improve patient safety: an observational study protocol. BMJ open, 5(12), e009650.
#humanfactors
Projects that are just getting off the ground
• The role of the patient in GP consultations involving possible cancer diagnosis (Jane Heyhoe)
• Emotion and diagnostic decision making in critical care (Jane Heyhoe and Daniel Stephenson)
• An intervention to support second victims of patient safety incidents
• Using patient experience data to foster local improvement (NIHR HS&DR)
#humanfactors
Improving patient care
Providing Human Factors Education
Debbie Clark and Wayne Robson
# humanfactors
Plan
• Overview
• Human factors training – TeamSTEPPS
• Simulation
#humanfactors
‘Mastery of quality and patient safety sciences and practices should be part of initial preparation and lifelong education of all health care professionals , including managers and executives.’
(National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England, 2013)
#humanfactors
Safety Science Education for All
Managers and executives
Frontline teams - Nursing, Medics, Allied Health Professionals
Pre registration -Nursing, Medics, Allied Health Professionals
#humanfactors
Local Example – Sheffield Hallam University
#humanfactors
Life long learning for frontline teams
• Provide specific human factors education
• Clinical focus
• Exploit opportunities
- Post registration Courses
- Mandatory Updates
• Online learning
#humanfactors
Life long learning for Mangers and Executives
• Provide specific human factors education
• Focus on open culture
• Safer system design
• Closing the gap between ‘work as imagined’ and ‘work as done’
• Strategically move towards becoming a High Reliability Organisation
#humanfactors
TeamSTEPPS - a solution to implementing human factors ?
Wayne Robson
#humanfactors
Key Principles TeamSTEPPS
#humanfactors
Ready to use resources http://www.teamsteppsportal.org/teamstepps-
materials
Master Trainer Course
https://tslms.org/login/index.php
#humanfactors
Barnsley’s plan
• Secure organisational commitment to HF training
• A way of supporting NatSSIPs
• Secure organisational commitment to trying TeamSTEPPS with some high risk teams /areas and to training key number of individuals as master trainers
#humanfactors
Barnsley’s plan
• Two people are undergoing online master trainer course
• Monthly HF session for Trust staff (to support Nat SIPPS) Offers an opportunity to try out some of TeamSTEPPs materials
• Culture Survey
#humanfactors
Increasing Capability & Capacity
Team training works
#humanfactors
Traditional Simulation
• Simulation as an educational technique
• Experiential learning
• Often single discipline
• Centre based
• Technical skills
• Non-technical skills
#humanfactors
In-situ Simulation
• Uses the real team and the real workplace
• Multidisciplinary - can involve large teams
• Greater focus on non-technical skills?
• Looks at the work environment, equipment, resources etc.
• Can uncover latent error
#humanfactors
Quality Improvement
In situ Simulation
Latent Errors Identified
Quality Governance Mechanism
#humanfactors
Conclusion
• Simulation can be used to uncover safety and quality issues and also to resolve these issues
• Simulation gives time and ‘permission’ to discuss work in a way that rarely happens outside simulation
• Can demonstrate issues in a way that is more widely and clearly understood
#humanfactors
Table Discussions
Discuss human factors education in your organisation:
– Which organisations are providing education?
– Who is attending?
Thinking about human factors education more broadly, what are the:
– Gaps?
– Duplications?
– Challenges?
– Opportunities?
#humanfactors
Lunch and Networking
#humanfactors
Open Space
Angela Green
#humanfactors
Your Space, now over to You to fill it!
About Open Space
• Concept developed from recognition of the value of networking and connecting with each other
• Much more than a giant coffee break
• Purposeful creation of the time and space to enable this
• Open Space principles work well when:
• there is a broad purpose but no agenda - delegates generate their own agenda
#humanfactors
Suitable Conditions for Open Space
• Complexity, in terms of the tasks to be done or outcomes achieved
• Diversity, in terms of the people involved and/or needed to make any solution work
• Conflict, real or potential, meaning people really care about the central issue or purpose
• Urgency, meaning that the time to act was "yesterday"
#humanfactors
Format of Open Space
• Proposer of the topic leads facilitation of the table discussion
• Agree on table who and how you will record notes and actions
• Remember The Law of Two Feet - If you find yourself in any situation where you are neither
learning nor contributing, use your two feet, go someplace else, no rules
• Feedback – opportunity to highlight the top 5 best conversations in the room
#humanfactors
Bulletin Board
Table Topic of conversation Proposer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Extra
#humanfactors
Gina’s Story
Lee Cutler
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
#humanfactors
Next steps
#humanfactors
Thank you for attending Please complete the evaluation form in your pack,
and return your badges before leaving
#humanfactors
Future Events
#humanfactors
Contact Details
t: 01274 383926
www.improvementacademy.org
@Improve_Academy
#humanfactors