Human Development Index-India
-
Upload
brigadier7862391 -
Category
Documents
-
view
117 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Human Development Index-India
Presented By:
Agenda:
• Human Development Concept
• HDI History, Meaning and
• HDI and its related indices
• Calculation of HDI
• Link between Economic Growth & Human
Development
• Planning in terms of Human Development
• HDI - India
• HDI - Critics
Human Development is necessary
because:
• Human Development is an end while
economic growth is only a means to it
• It is a means to higher productivity
• Helps in lowering family size
• It is good for the physical environment
• It reduces poverty and contributes to a
healthy civil society, increased democracy and
greater social stability
Essential components of Human
Development:
• Equity - People must enjoy equitable access
to opportunities
• Sustainability – The next generation must
enjoy the same well being that we enjoy
• Productivity – Requires investment in people
and enabling micro-environment for them
• Empowerment – It means people are in a
position to exercise choices of their own free
will
• An alternate to GNP - measure of nation’s
human development
• UNDP introduced HDI under the able
stewardship of Dr. Mahbub ul Haq in 1990
• HDI includes related indices like GDI, GEM and
HPI
• It is a composite index rather than a plethora of
indexes
•Ratings lie between 0-1 (0 is least and 1 signifies
good rating)
A process of enlarging people’s choices and
enhancing human capabilities and freedom,
enabling them to: live a long and healthy life,
have access to knowledge and a decent
standard of living, and participate in the life of
their community and decisions affecting their
lives.
• As per HDI of 2006: Iceland’s HDI is 0.968
(highest), Norway is 0.968, Canada is 0.967
• India’s HDI is 0.609, ranks 132nd
• HDI - Human Development Index
• GDI - Gender-related Development Index
• GEM - Gender Empowerment
• HPI - Human Poverty Index
• The index measurement is same as that of HDI,
but takes note of inequality in achievement
between women and men
• The methodology used imposes a penalty for
inequality
• GDI falls when the achievement levels of both
women and men in a country go down
• The greater the gender disparity in basic
capabilities, the lower a country's GDI compared
with its HDI.
•The Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) is a
measure of agency
• It evaluates progress in advancing women's
standing in political and economic forums
•Examines the extent to which women and men
are able to actively participate in economic and
political life.
(gender equality in economic and political participation & decision making)
• HPI uses indicators of the most basic dimensions of
deprivation: a short life, lack of basic education and lack
of access to public and private resources.
• The HPI concentrates on the deprivation in the three
essential elements of human life already reflected in
the HDI: longevity, knowledge and a decent
standard of living.
• Define a minimum and maximum value for each
of the three dimensions of the HDI
- Life Expectancy
- Real GDP per capita
- Educational attainment (combine two
variables)
1. Adult Literacy
2. Enrollment Ratio
i.e. 2 * (Adult Litracy) + (Enrollment Ratio)
• Define an index of achievement for each of the
three dimensions
•HDI is the simple average of three indices of
achievement
• HDI =(Life Expectancy Index + Real GDP Index +
Educational attainment Index ) / 3
Growth requires fostering of strong links between economic growth and Human Development. This can be accomplished in the following ways:
Provision of remunerative employment to people More equitable distribution of income and
economic opportunities Access to productive assets Investment in education and health Gender equality
Mahbub ul haq has made a strong plea for planning models and strategies in terms of human of human development.
1) The plans would start with a human balance sheet
2) Plans target would first be expressed in terms of basic human needs and only later translated into physical targets for production and consumption
3) Equal emphasis on production and distribution objectives.
Table 1: India's human development index 2006 and underlying indicators in comparison with No. 1 country.
HDI value2006
Life expectancy at birth (years)2006
Adult literacy rate (% ages 15 and above)2006
Combined primary, secondary & tertiary gross enrolment ratio (%)2006
GDP per capita(PPP US$)2006
1. Iceland (0.968)
1. Japan (82.4)
1. Georgia (100.0)
1. Australia (114.2)
1. Luxembourg (77,089)
132. India (0.609)
127. India (64.1)
118. India (65.2)
134. India (61.0)
126. India (2,489)
Table 2: Selected indicators of human poverty for India w.r.t. other countries
Human Poverty Index (HPI-1) 2006
Probability of not surviving past age 40 (%) 2005
Adult illiteracy rate (%ages 15 and older)
2006
People without access to an improved water source (%)2006
Children underweight for age (% ages 0-5) 2006
1. Czech Republic (1.7)
1. Singapore (1.8)
1. Cuba (0.2)
1. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
1. Croatia (1)
87. India (28.5)
84. India (16.8)
97. India (34.8)
49. India (11)
134. India (46)
Table 3: The GDI compared to the HDI – a measure of gender disparity
GDI as % of HDI
Life expectancy at birth(years) 2006
Adult literacy rate
(% ages 15 and older) 2006
Combined primary, secondary and tertiary gross enrolment ratio2006
Female as % male Female as % male Female as % male
1. Sweden (99.9%)
1. Russian Federation (123.1%)
1. Lesotho (122.5%)
1. United Arab Emirates (120.2%)
138. India (97.1%)
122. India (104.9%)
115. India (70.0%)
126. India (89.3%)
• Dasgupta and Weale (1992) point out the
fact that it is an index restricted to the socio-
economic sphere of life
• The second block of critics including
Srinivasan(1994) & UNDP(1993) is concerning
data quality and the exact construction of the
index
• The third range of arguments showing the
weakness of the HDI reflects the aggregation
problems (Desai, 1991)
• The last group of critics refers to the
technical properties of the index
(McGillivray)1991
• Empirical data to discuss the HDI capacity to
reflect human development through the
enlargement of people’s choices,
opportunities and capabilities