Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

60
1 Integrated Project Delivery Getting Under the Hood

description

Slides from a lecture given by Howard Ashcroft to CEE 100 at Stanford

Transcript of Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Page 1: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

1

Integrated Project DeliveryGetting Under the Hood

Page 2: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

2

Does Project Delivery Matter?

Page 3: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

3

Is Normal Normal?(or Dysfunctional)

Page 4: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

4

If You Could Start from a Clean Slate…

Page 5: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

5

An IPD Example:SMC Castro Valley

Page 6: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

6

Page 7: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Overview @ 70% Completion

• Expected Cost $255 Mill ion• Authorized Cost $225 Million• 30% Schedule Compression (and 6 weeks

ahead)• $5.8 Million Contingency (only $2.2 used)• 26 Owner Originated Changes (<1%)• 333 RFIs (Normal 3,000)• Intense Use of BIM• Full Budgeted Profit• No Compromises to Program

7

Page 8: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Performance Metrics

• Scope Installed EXACTLY as Modeled– Mechanical 99%– Plumbing 99%– Electrical 71%– Framing 79%

• Rework baseline actual

– Mechanical 7% 0.5%– Plumbing 10% 0.5%– Electrical 10% 8.5%– Framing 5% 0.5%

8

Page 9: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Productivity Improvements

Baseline Planned Actual ProjectedMechanical 100% 105% 116% 120%Plumbing 100% 100% 107% 110%Electrical 100% 114% 105% 107%Framing 100% 122% 120% 121%

9

Note: Baseline productivity based on contractors’ own historic productivity on similar projects.

Page 10: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

10

IPD Structure

Page 11: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Microstructure

11

Page 12: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Macrostructure

12

Page 13: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

13

Page 14: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Multiparty Integrated Agreement

14

Page 15: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

15

IPD: A Closer Look

Page 16: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Compensation Goals

• Fair Return for Efforts• Opportunity for Increase Profitability• Align Interests of Parties• Stimulate Creativity and Effort• Reduce Waste• Buffer Cost Overruns• Transparency and Accountability

16

Page 17: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Compensation Principles

• Profit based on Group Outcome– Project– Subgroup

• Profit and Cost Separated– No incentive to increase work– No disincentive to moving work to best capable– Fixed Fee on Variable Costs

• Transparent Costs– Accountable and Auditable

• Profit at Risk Sufficient to Buffer Overruns17

Page 18: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

The Art of Compensation

• Amount At-Risk• Metrics for Increasing/Decreasing

– Shared Savings Percentage• Targets

– When Should They Be Set– Benchmarking and Validation

• Cashflow• Buffering

18

Page 19: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

19

Page 20: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Compensation Design

20

Page 21: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

2 Party Milestone Distributions

21

Page 22: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Multi-variable Risk/Reward

22

Page 23: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Multi-variable Risk/Reward

23

Page 24: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Milestone Distribution Matrix

24

• Percentage of Profit Distributed at Milestones• If Preconditions Met• Distribution Percentages Vary Between Team

Members• Portion of Profit Held to Final Distribution

Page 25: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Other Quantitative Factors

• Schedule• Safety

– Lost days– Reportable Accidents

• Plan Percent Complete• RFI/Change Order Reduction• Energy Performance

25

Page 26: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Qualitative Factors

• Project Quality– Index Projects– 3rd Party Review

• Team Self-Reviews• Owner Satisfaction• Added Value List

26

Page 27: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Changes to Target Cost (HB)

• No Change Orders, Except– Owner Elected Changes (changed scope)– Owner Directives (unilateral changes)– Differing Site Conditions– Changes in Laws and Regulations– Owner’s Suspension or Termination

27

Page 28: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Project Decision Flow(HB/C191)

28

Page 29: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Waiver or Limitation?

• No claim unless exception to waiver

• No insurance for waived claims*

• No litigation for waived claims.

• Claims allowed, but damages limited

• Insurance for claims because not waived

• Litigation to enforce claims likely

29

Waiver of Claims Liability Limitation

* Some waivers have exception forinsured claims. (AIA C-191, some HB)

Page 30: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Liability Waivers (HB)

• Waiver of ALL Liability Among IPD Parties, Except:*– Willful Default– Warranty Claims– Project Performance– Allocation of Third Party Claims– Owner Directives– Non-payment by Owner– Termination or Suspension Costs– Indemnification Obligations– Failure to Procure Required Insurance– Insured Claims?*All projects have custom negotiated provisions that may differ from this description.

30

Page 31: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Insurance Developments

• Most IPD Projects use Traditional Insurance Products– Contractor/Trades should have Contractor’s

Professional Liability• A few multi-insurer integrated programs

– MaineGeneral• Integrated Policies being developed

31

Page 32: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

32

IPD Teams

Page 33: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

IPD Groups

• Committee– Small– Deciding, not Doing

• Group– Any size– Limited Synergies

• Team– Interactive– Synergistic– Creative

33

Page 34: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Advantages of Teams

• Creativity• Knowledge• Decision Accuracy• Engagement• Alignment and Coordination

34

Page 35: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Teams Can Be Worse!

• Overhead• Communication Complexity• Groupthink• Groupshift• Social Loafing• Bystander (Genovese) effect

35

Page 36: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Team Composition

• Skills– Technical Expertise– Problem Solving/Decision Skills– Interpersonal Skills

• Diversity– Experience & Knowledge– Creative Tension

• Size (5-9)– Small = efficient = 4 or 5– Large = creative <=12– Smallest team necessary

• Personality– Collaboration (1/3 not collaborative)– Command and Control– Firm Culture

36

Page 37: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Team Organization

• Cross-Functional Teams– Interdisciplinary– Systems or Areas

• Discrete Whole– Cost, Scope and ? Responsibility

• Design, Construction, Cost, Schedule, Commissioning

• Duration– R&D Teams 4 year peak– Package work to teams, not teams to work

• Teams within Teams• External or Internal Coordination

37

Page 38: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Team Management

• Bootcamp– Trust– Interpersonal Skills– Management (Lean) Skills

• Physical Proximity (Co-location)– Trust– Velocity of Communication– Quality of Communication– Break from Individual Corporate Cultures

• Visual Management• Decision Making• Coordination• Mentoring

– Scope– Interpersonal Skills/Disputes

• Specific Goals

38

Page 39: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Agile and Scrum

• Cross-functional teams• Self-Organizing teams

– No leader– Daily Scrum– Mentor (scrum master)

• Time-Boxing (sprints)• Face to Face Communication• Simplicity-the Art of Maximizing the Amount of

Work NOT done.• Continuous Attention to Technical Excellence• Regular attention to continuous improvement

39

Page 40: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Motivation is Largely Within

• Pay for Performance may be Detrimental– Pay inequities are detrimental

• Work Structure– Whole and Identifiable Task– Freedom and Autonomy– Adequate Resources– Positive Purpose– Challenge– Imposed or Selected Goals

• Authentic Leadership– Competent, ethical, and compassionate

40

Page 41: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

Creativity

• 3 Component Model– Expertise– Creative Thinking Skills– Inherent Interest

• Diversity• Open Communication• Moderate Conflict

– Task and Process, but never Personal• Active Mood• Moderate Challenge

41

Page 42: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

42

IPD Projects

Page 43: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

43

Page 44: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

44

Page 45: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

45

Page 46: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

46

Page 47: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

47

Page 48: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

48

Page 49: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

49

Page 50: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

50

Page 51: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

51

Page 52: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides
Page 53: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides
Page 54: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

54

Page 55: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

55

Page 56: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

56

Page 57: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

57

Page 58: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

IPD Resources

58

• IPD: A Working Definition (AIACC, 2007)• IPD: A Guide (AIA/AIACC, 2008)• Negotiating an IPD Agreement (Hanson Bridgett, 2011)• IPD Case Studies (AIA/AIACC, 2010)• IPD Case Studies (AIA 2011)• Managing Integrated Project Delivery (CMAA, 2010)• IPD For Public and Private Owners (NAFSA, COAA,

APPA, AIA, AGC, 2010)• Comparison of IPD Agreements (Hanson Bridgett, 2010)• IFOA Executive Summary (Hanson Bridgett, 2010)• Project Alliancing Practitioner’s Guide (Government of

Victoria , 2006)

Page 59: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

www.hansonbridgett.com/practices_industries/IPD_BIM.php

59

Page 60: Howard Ashcroft IPD Slides

www.ipd-ca.net

www.aia.org/ipd

www.consensusdocs.org

www.leanconstruction.org

www.bimforum.org

www.hansonbridgett.com

IPD Resources

60