How to respond on non-conformities - ISTA Online · How to respond on non-conformities ... §This...
Transcript of How to respond on non-conformities - ISTA Online · How to respond on non-conformities ... §This...
How to respond on non-conformities
ISTA Sampling Seminar June 16, 2014
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Dr. Rasha El-Khadem ISTA Accreditation and Technical
Department
Outline
• Definitions
• How to deal with non-conformities
• Challenges
• Findings from ISTA Audits:
• related to how to respond to non-conformities
• related to sampling
Definitions – ISO 9000
Non-conformity Non-fulfilment of a requirement
Requirement Need or expectation that is stated, generally implied or obligatory
Stated: stated for example in a document Generally implied: custom or common practice for the organisation, its customers and other interested parties
Requirements: ISTA Accreditation Standard ISTA Rules own documents
Definitions – ISO 9000
Requirement What about ISTA Handbooks? Are these requirements? Example: check of soil divider
Definitions – ISO 9000
Correction Action to eliminate a detected non-conformity (can be made in conjunction with a corrective action) Corrective action Action to eliminate the cause of a detected non-conformity or other undesirable situation Preventive action Action to eliminate the cause of a potential non-conformity or other undesirable situation
4 steps to follow
Non-conformities can occur at any time and there are different sources to identify them:
§ Internal audits
§ External audits
§ Customer complaints
§ Internal investigation
§ At any time during (routine) work
4 steps to follow
4 steps:
1) Record the non-conformity
2) Correct what can be corrected
3) Implement corrective actions § Investigate to find the root cause
§ Identify corrective actions
§ Implement corrective actions
4) Measure effectiveness of the corrective actions
Step 1
1) Record the non-conformity § Have a form available that is easy to fill in, have space
holders for all information that must be recorded (e.g. sample number, date, lot number, equipment, document, etc.)
§ During all steps this document will be used for recording
§ Even for ‘minor’ non-conformities the recording should be done to see the frequency
Step 2
2) Correct what can be corrected
§ This is a short term solution, only for this particular non-conformity
§ This only corrected the nonconformity, no investigation why this has happened or how to prevent this from recurrence
§ Examples: inform customer about delay for results
request an ISTA Certificate to be returned
Step 3
3) Define and implement corrective actions
§ Investigate to find the root causes of the non-conformity
§ Identify corrective actions
§ Implement corrective actions to remove the root cause. With this the non-conformity can not reoccur.
Step 3
NC: The balance was not calibrated.
Root cause
Why?
Why?
Why? The number of “why” to be asked until the
laboratory gets to the root cause might vary
from non-conformity to non-conformity.
Why?
Why?
Step 4
4) Measure effectiveness of the corrective actions
§ Define the time when to measure
§ Define how to measure
§ Perform the measurement of effectiveness
§ Judge if the result is acceptable
§ If it is acceptable à close ‘the case’
§ If it is not acceptable à go back to you root cause analysis, maybe your root cause was the wrong one…
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
% e
rror
rat
e
time
Corrective Action
Preventive Action
Improvement
Problem Risk
Corrective versus Preventive Action: What is the difference?
CA versus PA
Corrective versus Preventive Action: What is the difference?
Corrective Action Preventive Action
Problem Existing non-conformity Potential non-conformity
Root cause Analyse and identify Possible cause to be identified
Action Define and implement
Evaluation Measure effectiveness Measure risk reduction
Follow-up measure
Define and implement
Reporting CA report PA report
The laboratory needs to think about: Ø Do we need to investigate for all non-conformities the
root cause?
Ø Is there always a root cause?
Ø How to deal with ‘human failures’?
Ø Do we really record all non-conformities or are we (or staff members) trying to hide some to please the statistics?
Challenges
Issues seen during ISTA audits Ø No procedure available for non-conforming work and
corrective actions.
Ø Corrective and preventive actions are not implemented.
Ø The laboratory did not follow up on corrective actions taken to ensure they are effective.
Ø Only non-conformities identified during internal audits are recorded.
Ø The laboratory did not follow up on non-substantial non-conformity identified during the previous ISTA audit.
Reality
ISTA audits - NC
ISTA audits – Sampling A - Automatic samplers
3%
D - Mixing and dividing
7%
E - Equipment (not suitable, not correctly
managed, labelling)29%
G - General1%
I - Instructions (SOPs and records)
26%
IC - ISTA Certificates
0%
L - Seed lot (something wrong with the seed lot
or labelling)1%
M - Methodology (How to use triers, primary
samples)13%
S - Sample (sample ID, sample size, sample
storage)7%
V - Verification of equipment
13%
Sampling NC by category (n=344)
29% Equipment, e.g. Triers not suitable Seed dividers not big enough Equipment not uniquely labelled Levelling of dividers Buckets to collect sample not suitable
Reality
ISTA audits – Sampling A - Automatic samplers
3%
D - Mixing and dividing
7%
E - Equipment (not suitable, not correctly
managed, labelling)29%
G - General1%
I - Instructions (SOPs and records)
26%
IC - ISTA Certificates
0%
L - Seed lot (something wrong with the seed lot
or labelling)1%
M - Methodology (How to use triers, primary
samples)13%
S - Sample (sample ID, sample size, sample
storage)7%
V - Verification of equipment
13%
Sampling NC by category (n=344)
26% Instructions, e.g. SOP or form missing SOP incomplete SOP contains incorrect information Data not recorded
Reality
ISTA audits – Sampling A - Automatic samplers
3%
D - Mixing and dividing
7%
E - Equipment (not suitable, not correctly
managed, labelling)29%
G - General1%
I - Instructions (SOPs and records)
26%
IC - ISTA Certificates
0%
L - Seed lot (something wrong with the seed lot
or labelling)1%
M - Methodology (How to use triers, primary
samples)13%
S - Sample (sample ID, sample size, sample
storage)7%
V - Verification of equipment
13%
Sampling NC by category (n=344)
13% Methodology, e.g. Sampling done incorrectly Incorrect use of triers Issues with size of primary samples
Reality
ISTA audits – Sampling A - Automatic samplers
3%
D - Mixing and dividing
7%
E - Equipment (not suitable, not correctly
managed, labelling)29%
G - General1%
I - Instructions (SOPs and records)
26%
IC - ISTA Certificates
0%
L - Seed lot (something wrong with the seed lot
or labelling)1%
M - Methodology (How to use triers, primary
samples)13%
S - Sample (sample ID, sample size, sample
storage)7%
V - Verification of equipment
13%
Sampling NC by category (n=344)
13% Verification, e.g. Dividers not verified
Reality
ISTA audits – Sampling A - Automatic samplers
3%
D - Mixing and dividing
7%
E - Equipment (not suitable, not correctly
managed, labelling)29%
G - General1%
I - Instructions (SOPs and records)
26%
IC - ISTA Certificates
0%
L - Seed lot (something wrong with the seed lot
or labelling)1%
M - Methodology (How to use triers, primary
samples)13%
S - Sample (sample ID, sample size, sample
storage)7%
V - Verification of equipment
13%
Sampling NC by category (n=344)
7% Mixing and dividing, e.g. No mixing done Incorrect mixing Incorrect use of spoon method
Reality