How To Ensure Your Agency Has A Strong Subrecipient Monitoring System Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq....
-
Upload
kerry-watts -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
4
description
Transcript of How To Ensure Your Agency Has A Strong Subrecipient Monitoring System Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq....
How To Ensure Your Agency Has A Strong Subrecipient Monitoring System
Jennifer S. Mauskapf, [email protected]
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCFall Forum 2015
2
AGENDA
• What is a pass-through entity? • New responsibilities for pass-through entities
under the UGG:• Required Information in Subaward Notifications• Risk assessment• Enhanced monitoring/performance metrics • Enforcement
• Internal Controls
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
What is a pass-through
entity?
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
4
Definitions • 200.74, Pass-through entity - non-Federal
entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal program.
• 200.93, Subrecipient - a non-Federal entity that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a Federal program.
• 200.23, Contractor (replaces term “vendor” (used in A-133)) – means an entity that receives a contract.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
How a does a pass-through entity’s responsibilities
change under the Uniform Grant
Guidance?
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
6
Types of Grant Agreements• 200.201, Pass-through entity must decide on the appropriate
instrument for the Federal award: • Grant agreement • Cooperative agreement • Contract • Fixed amount awards (New) (See 200.332 and 200.45)
• Requires prior approval from Federal awarding agency• Payments are based on meeting specific requirements of
the Federal Award• Accountability is based on performance and results• Award amount is negotiated using cost principles as a
guide up to $150,000 (Simplified Acquisition Threshold)• No governmental review of the actual costs incurred• Significant changes must receive prior written approval
from the awarding entity
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
7
Determination of Nature of Funding 200.330
Subaward Contract Allowable activities based on applicable statute, local plan, State rules Management rules
Applicable OMB Circular; and State law/policies and procedures
Allowable activities based on terms and conditions of contract Management rules
Terms of the contract; and State contract law
• Must make a case-by-case determination whether each agreement casts the party as a subrecipient or contractor. • Look at the nature of the relationship. • It does not matter what the agreement is called.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
8
Subaward vs. Contract• Subrecipients 200.330(a)• Must determine who is eligible to participate in
a federal program • Has its performance measured against whether
the objectives of the federal program are met• Is responsible for programmatic decision
making• Is responsible for complying with federal
program requirements• Uses the federal funds to carry out a program
as compared to providing goods or services for a program
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
9
Subaward vs. Contract (cont.)• Contractor 200.330(b)• Provides the goods and services within
normal business operations • Provides similar goods or services to many
different purchasers• Operates in a competitive environment• Provides goods or services that are ancillary
to the operation of the federal program• Is not subject to compliance requirements of
the federal program
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
10
•OMB/COFAR shifted many new responsibilities to the pass-through
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
1. Subaward Notifications –Information Requirement
s
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
12
Information that Must be Included in Subawards (200.331(a))
1. Federal award identification information: i. Subrecipient name (must match registered
unique entity identifier)ii. Subrecipient unique entity identifieriii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN)iv. Federal Award Date
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
13
Information that Must be Included in Subawards (200.331(a))
v. Period of performance start and end datesvi. Amount of federal funds ‘obligated by this
action’vii. Total amount of federal funds ‘obligated to the
subrecipient’viii.Total amount of the federal award ix. Federal award project description (FFATA)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
14
Information that Must be Included in Subawards (200.331(a))
x. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact official
xi. CFDA Number and Namexii. Is the award for “research and development” xiii.The indirect cost rate
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
15
Information that Must be Included in Subawards (200.331(a))
2. Requirements of the federal grant imposed upon subrecipient
3. Any additional requirements imposed by the pass-through (e.g., identification of any required financial and performance reports)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
16
Information that Must be Included in Subawards (200.331(a))
4. Approved indirect cost rate for subrecipient5. Required assurance from subgrantees that
access will be provided to records and financial statements
6. Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
2. New Risk Management Requirement
s for Pass-Through Entities
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
18
Pass-Through Entity Risk Management Requirements (200.331(b))
Pass-through must evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate monitoring
Timing: before applicant receives funding??
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
19
Pass-Through Entity Risk Management Requirements (200.331(b))
• Risk Factors may include consideration of:1. Subrecipient’s prior experience with the
grant program 2. Results of previous audits3. New personnel or substantially changed
systems4. Results of federal monitoring
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
20
Specific Subaward Conditions 200.331(b) & 200.207
Pass-through must consider imposing additional federal award conditions, if appropriate, such as: Require reimbursement; Withhold funds until evidence of acceptable performance; More detailed reporting; Additional monitoring; Require grantee to obtain technical or management
assistance; or Establish additional prior approvals.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
21
The ED/RMS Approach: Entity Risk Report (ERR)
• ERR = ED Pre-Award Risk Assessment Rubric• Incorporates information from multiple data sources (data
driven decision-making)• Focuses on both compliance and performance, working to
incorporate more focus on performance• Used by both RMS and OIG
• RMS uses ERR looking forward• OIG uses ERR looking backward
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
22
ED/RMS Approach—Risk Factors
• Repeat findings• Program Specific Findings• $ amount of questioned costs as % of award• Missing audit(s)• Adverse/disclaimed opinion of financial statements• Going concern statement (financial stability/bankruptcy)• Poor financial management• Substandard performance
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
23
ED/RMS Approach—Scoring/Color Key
Color DescriptionRED Significant indication of potential risk: increased
monitoring or special conditions may be appropriateYELLOW Elevated indication of potential risk: increased
monitoring may be appropriateGREEN Low indication of potential risk: routine monitoring
may be appropriateBLUE No data available: increased or routine monitoring
may be appropriate
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
24
The ED/RMS Approach: Entity Risk Report (ERR)
• ERR is ED’s Risk Assessment Rubric• Incorporates information from multiple data sources (data
driven decision-making)SEA Admin.
Risk Score
Financial Risk Score
Suspected Late Audit
State Audit?
Internal Control Risk Score
SEA A
25 0 N Y 110
SEA B
25 0 2011 Y 35
SEA C
225 50 N Y 135
SEA D
25 0 2012 Y 65
SEA E 50 0 N Y 70
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
25
The ED/RMS Approach: ED Clarifiers re: ERR
• Not a decision or scoring tool• Not designed to deny awards• Highlights evidence of potential risks in implementing
grant• Helps identify conditions that can help make awarding of
grant more successful• Need to incorporate better program performance data
• Program Reviews• Performance Reports• Education Statistics Reporting
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
3. New Enhanced
Monitoring/Performance
Metrics
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
27
Monitoring Requirements (200.331(d))
• Pass-through must monitor its subrecipients to assure compliance and performance goals are achieved
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
28
Monitoring Requirements (200.331(d))
• Monitoring must assure compliance and performance goals are achieved • Must include:
1. Review financial and programmatic reports2. Ensure corrective action3. Issue a “management decision” on audit
findings
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
29
Performance Reports Required 200.328(b)(2)
“Performance reports” required to be submitted at least annually using “OMB-approved government-wide
standard information collections”
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
30
Measuring Performance: “Performance Metrics” 200.328
“Performance reports” must include:
1. Comparing actual accomplishments to the objectives established by the federal award
a. Where accomplishments can be quantified, a computation of the cost may be required
b. May require performance trend data
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
31
Measuring Performance: “Performance Metrics” 200.328 (cont.)
2. The reasons why established goals were not met, if appropriate
3. Additional pertinent information including, when appropriate, analysis and explanation of cost overruns or high unit costs
4. Significant developmentsa. Problems, delays, adverse conditionsb. Favorable developments
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
32
Monitoring Tool Recommendations (200.331(e))
Depending on assessment of risk, the following monitoring tools may be useful: 1. Training + technical assistance on program-
related matters2. On-site reviews3. Arranging for “agreed-upon-procedures”
engagements
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
33
Audit Resolution (200.331(e))
• Pass-through must verify all required subrecipients have single audits• Audit threshold
raised from $500K (A-133 circular) to $750K (Uniform Grant Guidance) – Places greater burden on pass-through
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
34
Issuance of Management Decisions 200.521
Management Decision must state:• Whether audit finding sustained• Reasons for decision• Expected auditee action• If corrective action not yet complete,
timetable
Must be issued within six months of acceptance of the audit report
Corrective action must begin immediately
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
35
Changes to Compliance Supplement Requirements?
• Uniform Grant Guidance NPRM (February 1, 2013) proposed reduction in number of types of compliance requirements in the compliance supplement
• Many pass-throughs opposed this reduction because of burden on them
• Outcome?
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
Compliance Requirements
• 12 areas of concern that auditors are directed to look for when completing Single Audits• Eliminated “Davis-Bacon Act” and “Real
Property Acquisition and Relocation Assistance”• If “deleted” from certain programs’ Single
Audit requirements, pass-through entities still responsible for ensuring compliance
36Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
37
200.331(g)
• Pass-through must adjust its own financial records based on audits, monitoring, on-site reviews
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
4. Enforcement
(new for IHEs, Hospitals and Non-Profits)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
39
200.331(h)
• Pass-throughs must consider taking enforcement action based on noncompliance • Temporarily withhold cash payments pending
correction• Disallow all or part of the cost• Wholly or partly suspend the award• Recommend to federal awarding agency
suspension/debarment • Withhold further federal awards • Other remedies that may be legally available
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
40
200.339
• The pass-through may terminate the award for “cause,” notice and opportunity for hearing (200.340 and 200.341)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
Internal Controls
41Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
42
Important Internal Controls Oversight responsibility for subrecipient monitoring is tied very closely to internal controls that nonfederal entities, including pass-through entities, are required to have in place.
This includes having: • well-trained and knowledgeable staff members;• sufficient resources (financial and staffing)
dedicated to subrecipient monitoring;
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
43
Internal Controls (Cont.)
• oversight managers with knowledge to identify the most appropriate methods/tools and extent of monitoring to be used (§200.331(e)(1));
• indicators to help identify risks from outside factors that may affect a subrecipient’s performance (those related to economic conditions, political changes, regulatory changes or unreliable information) (§200.331(b));
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
44
Internal Controls (Cont.)
• official written policies and procedures (e.g., methodology for resolving findings of noncompliance or internal control weaknesses) (§§200.303; 200.331(e));• Follow-up processes to ensure timely
appropriate actions are taken or completed on a subrecipient’s reported deficiencies (§200.331(d)(2)); and• Reviews of the subrecipient’s financial and
programmatic reports (§200.331(d)(1)).
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.
45
• This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service. This presentation does not create a client-lawyer
relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of
Professional Conduct. Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation
with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar
with your particular circumstances.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC © 2015. All rights reserved.