How telomeres protect chromosome ends from engaging the ... · How telomeres protect chromosome...
Transcript of How telomeres protect chromosome ends from engaging the ... · How telomeres protect chromosome...
How telomeres protect chromosome endsHow telomeres protect chromosome endsfrom engaging the DNA damage response
Sandy Chang, M.D., Ph.D.
Dept. of Laboratory MedicineDept. of Laboratory MedicineYale University School of Medicine
NIANIAJanuary 18, 2011
Mammalian telomeres
t l
telomereuncapping
telomeredysfunction
absence of t l
DNA d m
telomerase
DNA damageresponse
p53 losswt p53
cancer initiation
pp
apoptosissenescence
Deng et al., Nat Rev Cancer2008
n t at onsenescence
Consequence of natural telomere attrition: multiple non-reciprocal chromosomal translocations in tumors with short telomeres
G6G6
Breast tumor TD 574
T(18; 6; 5)T(6; 12)
T(18; 6; 5)T(6; 12) T(18; 6; 5)T(6; 12)
T(6;2)
DAPI image SKY image
Artandi et al., Nature 2000
Massive end-to-end chromosome fusions in the absence of Trf2
Dysfunctional telomeres promote genomic instability
Six subunits in shelterin interacts with the t-loop: TRF1,TRF2,TIN2,RAP1,TPP1 and POT1
telomerase
POT1-Protection of Telomere 1
Required for telomere end protection
Negative regulator of telomere length
POT1 structure
M P t1 N- OB1 OB2Mouse Pot1a
74% 73% 71%
TPP1 BD
N- OB1 OB2Mouse Pot1b
74% 81% 73%
TPP1 BD
OB1 OB2N-Human POT1
74% 81% %
TPP1 BD
Lei et al., Nature Struc and Mol Biol 2004
Conditional Deletion of Mouse Pot1a
frtfrtlo
xP
ATG
4
loxP
targeting
ADT
NotIneo 4 5 vector
B BDT
frtfrt loxP
targeted allele Pot1recneo 5
B B
ATG
4
7 kbS S
11 8 kblo
xP
Cre recombinase
7 kb 11.8 kb
null allelePot1Δ
1 re
c/Δ
B C D Δ/Δ
1 Δ
/Δ
rec/Δ
+/+
C
Pot1
mPot1aCmPot1a
Pot1
a-m
yc
Pot1
a+/+
Pot1
Pot1
Pot1
Pot1
Pot1
Δ/Δ
Pot1
rec/Δ
BGAPDHcontrol
Pot1rec/Δ MEF
*
P PP
Pot1rec/Δ MEF
Elevated DNA damage response in Pot1a deleted cells
A10 Gy γ-IR, Pot1rec/Δ Pot1Δ/+ Pot1rec/Δ
AX
Pot1Δ/Δ
A
γH
2A
C53BP1 telomere mergeB magnified
AdCIRPot1Δ/+ Pot1rec/ΔPot1rec/Δ
AdC
ATM-Ser1981-PChk2-PChk2
- + +-AdCreγ-IR
- +AdCre
t1Δ
/Δ, p
53-/-
Chk2γ-H2AX-P
γ-tubulin
Pot
A B
Pot1a loss leads to multiple cytogenetic aberrations and malignant transformation
A
f db
B
a b c d a c
d
e
b
C D
Pot1rec/Δ sarcomaPot1aΔ/Δ , p53-/- sarcoma
Pot1aΔ/Δ , p53-/-
MMTVcre - pot1aF/Fbreast tumor
Acceleration of MMTV-Cre+ ; Pot1aFF breast tumorsin the absence of p53
1.0 cre-pot1af/f
MMTVcre - pot1aF/F breast tumor
1.0 cre- pot1f/f p53f/
MMTVcre-pot1f/f-p53 mutant breast tumors
l
Cre- Pot1aFF
n=21al
Cre- Pot1aFF p53FF
n=22al
0.5
cre+pot1af/f.
mor
sur
vial
0.5
cre+/+ p53f/fcre+pot1f/fp53f/+cre+pot1f/fp53f/f
mor
sur
vial
Cre+ Pot1aFF
n=21
ree
surv
iva
ree
surv
iv
0 0
% o
f tu
0 0
% o
f tun=23
% tu
mor
fr Cre+ Pot1aFF p53F/+
n=31Cre+ Pot1aFF p53FF
n=25
% tu
mor
f
0 10 20 300.0
Time ( months)0 5 10 15 20
0.0
Monthmonths
%
months
Pot1aF/F
Pot1aΔ/Δ
tail tumor
Pot1a
Ling Wu
Massive telomere amplifications in MMTV-Cre+ Pot1aΔ/Δ breast tumors
POT1a is required for telomere end protection
POT1a
POT1a
TIFs
p53
Genomic instability
tumorigenesis
Pot1Δ/Δ
GA
Conditional deletion of mouse Pot1b
Frt Frt
DT Lox p Lox p NotItargeting vector
wt allele11KB
ATGA
3
3 4
4Neo
11KB
Cre recombinase
recombined allele:Pot1brec
Neo
7 8KB
3 4
Cre recombinase
null allele: Pot1b-/-
7.8KB
B C DB C
Pot1b transcript
D
wt: 11Kbt t 7 8kb Pot1b transcript
GPDHloading control
mutant:7.8kb
Generating Pot1b null alleles
5’ TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG) 3’
TIN2 TPP1
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
POT1bTRF1 TRF2/Rap1 telomerase
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’
TIN2 TPP1
( )3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
POT1bTRF1 TRF2/Rap1 telomerase
Deletion of Pot1b in the setting of telomerase deficiency results in diminished lifespan y p
100
ve
-/+ mTR+/- n=9
Pot1b -/- mTR +/+ n=12
Pot1b
50
% m
ice
aliv
male Pot1b -/- mTR+/- n=12
Pot1b-/- mTR-/- n=6
female Pot1b-/- mTR +/- n=13
0 100 200 3000
days400
days
A Pot1b-/- mTR+/+ Pot1b-/- mTR+/- Pot1b-/- mTR-/-WT
Complete bone marrow failure in Pot1b-/- mTR+/- mice
Pot1b / mTR / Pot1b mTR Pot1b mTRWT
BWT Pot1b-/- mTR+/-
32% 15.2%69.9%1.1%
CD
11b
2%27% 1.4%31.4%
Gr-1
Depletion of hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells in Pot1b-/- mTR+/- bone marrow
WT (6 months) 2 months 4 months 6 monthsLin- Lin- Lin- Lin-
2.04% 0.23% 0.39% 0.06%1.34% 0.13% <0.01% <0.01%
C-K
it
Sca-1
Eric Wang
1500
A15
Peripheral blood defects in Pot1b-/- mTR+/- mice
0
500
1000
Plat
elet
X103 /μ
L
0
5
10R
BC
X106 μ
L
5.0
7.5
WB
CX1
03 / μL
00
5.0
7.5
% B
last
s
0.0
2.5
0.0
2.5
%
a bB C
AD
5.2%3.2% 12.6%0.1%WT Pot1b-/- mTR+/-
c d 7-AA
8.8%83.0% 70.9%16.4%
Annexin V
Pot1b-/- mTR +/- mice displays phenotypes resemblingDyskeratosis congenita (DC)
b l ki• abnormal skin pigmentation
Pot1b-/- mTR+/+ Pot1b-/- mTR+/-WT
• nail dystrophy
• BM failure
WT Pot1b-/- mTR+/+
Dyskeratosis congenita
Dyskeratosis congenita is a telomere disease
Dyskerin is a pseudouridine synthase; modifies rRNA, spliceosomal RNA, using a H/ACA small guide RNAs
•Mutated in X-linked dyskeratosis congenita (Collins)
•aplastic anemia
•pulmonary fibrosis, hyperpigmentation, oral leukoplakia, nail dystrophy
•very short telomeresy
•TERC or TERT are mutated in autosomal dominant DC (Dokal, Greider)
•NOP10, a small ribonucleoprotein, is mutated in autosomal recessive DC (Dokal)
•Heterozygous mutation in TINF2 recently observed in DC e e o ygous u a o ece y obse ed Cpatients (Savage, Dokal)
Increased G-strand overhang and progressive telomere shortening in the absence of Pot1b
A B
35 42 1 35 3510 41 35 42 1 35 3510 41passage
Overhang(CCCTAA)4 (TTAGGG)4
Total telomere (CCCTAA)4
Overhang (TTAGGG)4
Total telomere
liver MEFsliver MEFs
Increased chromosome fusion and telomere shortening in Pot1b-/-
mTR+/- cells
mTR
+/-D
Pot
1b-/-
m
E
Pot1b-/- mTR+/- MEFs initiate a DNA damage response at telomeres
+/-m
TR+/
-
TTAGGG γ-H2Ax merge
100Pot1b+/- mTR+/-
Pot
1bm
TR+/
+
25
50
75
Pot1b , mTR
Pot1b-/-, mTR+/+
Pot1b-/-, mTR+/-
% o
f tot
al c
ells
Pot
1b-/-
TR+/
-
0 1-3 3-5 >60
number of TIFs per cell
Pot
1b-/-
mT
Pot1b is required to modulate ss overhang formation
1b
Pot1b loss
1b
Pot1b lossInsufficient telomerase
Increased overhang generation
Adapted from Ramiro and Karlseder, Nature 2007
Accelerated telomere shorteningIncreased DDR at telomeresp53-dependent apoptosis
Role of repressor activator protein 1 (RAP1) in telomere end protection
γγH2AXH2AX//TRF1TRF1
TRF2+/+
TRF2TRF2
RAP1RAP1
TRF1TRF1
γγH2AXH2AX//TRF1TRF1
TRF2TRF2TRF1TRF1
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1 POT1POT15’3’
γγH2AXH2AX//TRF1TRF1
TRF2-/-
TRF1TRF1
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1 POT1POT15’3’TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1 3
Celli, GB et al., (2006) Nature Cell Biology
Removal of TRF2 from telomeres results in DDR at telomeres and massive chromosome end fusions
γγH2AXH2AX//TRF1TRF1
TRF2-/-
TRF1TRF1TRF1TRF1
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1 POT1POT15’3’
Removal of TRF2 results in rapid disappearance of Rap1 from telomeres.
In yeast, Rap1 is involved in protecting telomeres from NHEJ independent from TRF2-like homologs.
What are the roles for mammalian Rap1 in telomere end protection?
Knockdown of Rap1 by shRNA does not work well
TRF2TRF2TRF1TRF1
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1 POT1POT15’ 3’TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1
ptfR
ap1
trans
crip
kno
ckdo
wn
of
%
Knockdown of RAP1 transcripts using 5 shRAP1 constructs. 1 2 3 4 5
O’Connor , JBC 2004
Strategy to study the in vivo function of Rap1
XX
RAP1RAP1
3’
TRF2 binding mutantTRF2 binding mutantTRF1TRF1
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1 POT1POT15’
XX
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1
Replacement of endogenous TRF2 ith R 1 bi diTRF2 with Rap1 binding
deficient mutant
shRNA mediated knockdown of TRF2 results in massive telomere fusions
Deng et. al., Nature 2009
Characterization of the TRF2-Rap1 interaction
Isothermal titration Calorimetry
Kd=16.5 nM
Ming Lei, U of Michigan
Purification and crystallization of the TRF2RBM and Rap1RCT complex
Crystal of the TRF2RBM-Rap1RCT complexgel-filtration SDS-PAGE
Crystal Structure of the TRF2RBM-Rap1RCT Complex at 1.95 A resolution
The TRF2RBM-Rap1RCT interface
TRF2: L288 Rap1: I318, F336
ITC analysis of the TRF2RBM-Rap1RCT interface
Yeast two-hybrid analysis of the TRF2RBM-Rap1RCT interface
Rap1 I318R TRF2 L288R
A single point mutation insidethe hydrophobic pocket issufficient to disrupt the ability of TRF2 to bind Rap1.
Rap1 F336R
Rap1 I318R TRF2 L288RTRF2 L288E
Co-IP analysis the TRF2-Rap1 Interface in mammalian cells
TRF2 is essential for Rap1 localization to telomeres
telomerestelomeres
The TRF2-Rap1 interaction not required for TRF2 telomere localization
telomeres
Minimal DNA damage response at telomeres in the absence of Rap1
TRF2, not Rap1, is required to repress the DDR at telomeres.
Rap1 is required to repress telomere HR
TTAGGG merge
25
53BP1-/-
53BP1-/-+shTRF
d2 FL
CCCTAA6R
10
15
20
chro
mos
ome
end
TRF
hTR
F2
TRF2
L286
Fl53BP1
shTR
f2FL5
3BP1
D1256
AD15
21R
S18
0
5
T-SC
E/sh
86R
TRF2
L2
Distinct roles for Rap1 and TRF2 in telomere end protection
TRF2TRF2
RAP1RAP1
TRF1TRF1 5’ TRF1TRF1 5’
TRF2 L286RTRF2 L286R
TRF1TRF1 5’
XX
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1POT1POT1 3’
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1POT1POT1 3’
TIN2TIN2 TPP1TPP1POT1POT1 3’
no DDR massive DDRrampant chrom fusions
minimal DDRfew chrom fusions
mTrf2shRNA/mTRF2 L286R
NHEJ repression rampant chrom fusions few chrom fusionstelomere HR
Rap1 is not required to repress DDR and NHEJ at telomeresRap1 repress HR at telomeres..
Repair of dysfunctional telomeres by the NHEJ pathway
O’Sullivan and Karlseder, Nature Reviews MCB 2010
Trf2 and Pot1a repress distinct DNA damage signaling pathways
TIN2 TPP1
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
TIN2 TPP1
POT1TRF1 TRF2/Rap1
ATM ATR
Possibility that TRF2 and POT1-TPP1 repress distinct DNA repair pathways at telomeres.
Denchi and de Lange, Nature 2007Guo et al; EMBO J 2007
Disruption of TRF2 leads to ATM-dependent telomere fusions through C-NHEJthrough C NHEJ
TIN2 TPP1
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
TIN2 TPP1
POT1TRF1MRN
ATMATR
Ku70/8053BP1
C-NHEJfactors
DNA-PK
Ligase 4
end-to-end chromosomefusionsDeng et al., Nature 2009
Dimitrova et al., MCB 2009
Denchi and de Lange, Nature 2007Guo et al; EMBO J 2007
Disruption of Pot1a-Tpp1 leads to ATR-dependent telomere fusions
TIN2
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
TIN2
TRF1TRF1 TRF2/Rap1
ATM ATR
? DNA damage signal
end-to-end chromosome fusions TIFsDenchi and de Lange, Nature 2007Guo et al; EMBO J 2007
Disruption of Pot1a-Tpp1 leads to chromosome fusions independent of C-NHEJ
TIN2
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
TIN2
TRF1TRF1 TRF2/Rap1MRN
ATRATM
Ku70/8053BP1
C-NHEJfactors
Ku70/80DNA-PK
Ligase 4
end-to-end chromosome fusions
Chromosome fusions in the absence of Tpp1-Pot1a does not require 53BP1
60
70
80
used
53BP1+/+ 53BP1 /
*****
** ****
60
70
80
used
53BP1+/+ shTRF2 53BP1-/- TPP1ΔRD
pty RF2 RDΔ RDΔ c
0
10
20
30
40
50
% o
f end
s f53BP1+/+ 53BP1-/-
ty F2 RDΔ RDΔ
0
10
20
30
40
50
% o
f end
s fu
53BP1-/- shTRF2 53BP1-/- shTRF2-TPP1ΔRD
Empsh
TRF Δ
TPP1
Δ
shTRF2+
TPP1 vec
Emptysh
TRF2 RΔ
TPP1
RΔ
shTRF2+
TPP1 Em
Chromosome fusions in the absence of Tpp1-Pot1a does not require Lig4
30d Lig4-/- 53BP1-/-
Lig4-/- shTRF2 Lig4-/- shTRF2-TPP1ΔRD
10
20
omos
ome
ends
fuse
Lig4 53BP1ve
ctor
shTR
F2 RDΔ
TPP1
RDΔ
shTRF2+
TPP1
RD
ig4+s
hTRF2+
TPP1sh
TRF
0% c
hro
53BP1-/- shLig4 shTRF2-TPP1ΔRD shLigLig4-/- TPP1ΔRD
Chromosome fusions in the absence of Tpp1-Pot1a does notrequire Ku70
Ku--/-shTRF2-TPP1ΔRD
***
**
***
**
60
d
Ku-/- shTRF2 Ku-/-+TPP1ΔRD Ku-/- -shTRF2-TPP1ΔRD
20
40
% o
f end
s fu
sed
Ku70-/- shLig4 + Ku70-/-
vecto
rsh
TRF2 RDΔ
TPP1
RDΔ
shTRF2+
TPP1 vecto
rsh
TRF2 RDΔ
TPP1
RDΔ
shTRF2+
TPP1
0
Ku-/- -shLig-shTRF2 Ku-/--shLig4-TPP1ΔRD Ku-/--shLig4-shTRF2-TPP1ΔRD
s s
A-NHEJ mediated repair of DNA double strand breaks
Rass et al., NSMB 2009
Disruption of Pot1a-Tpp1 leads to alternative NHEJ mediated chromosome fusions
TIN2
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
TIN2
TRF1TRF1 TRF2/Rap1MRN
ATRATM
No chromosome fusions
CtIP
No chromosome fusions
shCtIP-TPP1RD
CtIP is required for A-NHEJ mediated repair of telomeres lacking Tpp1-Pot1a
TPP1ΔRD shTRF2-TPP1ΔRDshTRF2
Fs
7553BP1-/-
53BP1-/- + shCTIPd
shTRF2-TPP1RD
53B
P1-/-
MEF
25
50
% o
f end
s fu
sed
shCtIP-shTRF2
vecto
r RDΔ
shTRF2+
TPP1 vecto
rsh
TRF2 RDΔ
TPP1
RDΔ
shTRF2+
TPP1
0
hTR
hTR
shCtIP-TPP1RD shCtIP-shTRF2-TPP1RD shT
shT
Naturally shortened telomeres are repaired independent of the C-NHEJ pathway
G4 mTerc-/- 53BP1-/- miceG4 mTerc-/- 53BP1+/-mice
1.0
1.5
er m
etap
hase
BM
BP1-/-
BP1+/-
BP1-/-
BP1+/-
BP1-/-
0.0
0.5
fusi
ons
pe
/ B
G1 BP
G1-G2 B
G3-G4 B
P
G3-G4 BG4 53BP1+/-
10
15
taph
ase
ma
0
5
fusi
ons
per
me
lym
pho m
G4 53BP1-/-
G2 BP1+
/+
G2 BP1-/
-
G4 BP1+
/+
G4 BP1-/
-
0
MEFs
Distinct repair pathways depending on how telomeres are uncapped
TIN2 TPP1
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
TIN2 TPP1
POT1TRF1TRF1
MRN
ATM ATR
C-NHEJ A-NHEJ53BP1Ku70/80Lig4
fusions fusionsLig4
Distinct repair pathways depending on how telomeres are uncapped
TIN2
5’-TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG(TTAGGG)n-3’3’-AAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCCAAGCCC
TIN2
TRF1TRF1 TRF2/Rap1
MRN
natural telomere attrition
ATM ATR
C-NHEJ A-NHEJ
CtIP
fusions fusions
Acknowledgements
Pot1aLing Wu
Asha Multani
Funding
NIAAsha Multani
Pot1bHua He
E i Y
NCISusan Komen
Kadoorie Charitable TrustEric Yang
Rap1Rekha Rai
Ming Lei, U of Michigan
A-NHEJRekha RaiRekha Rai
Hong ZhengPhilip Carpenter, UT Medical
School