How Should CIOs deal with Web-based Auctions?

2
E xploiting the Internet for commer- cial benefit has become a key theme for Chief Information Officers at most organizations. Significant advantages are to be gained for both sellers and buyers. Savings are made by reducing transaction costs, increasing the circle of potential customers as well as by improving the search-and-find capabilities for all parties concerned [1, 2, 4]. Web-based auctioning is a rapidly expanding application of the Internet. The matching of demand and supply at the best price at one specific point in time is the additional benefit of a Web-based auction. The advantages, however, must be considered against lower switching costs for auc- tion participants. Are auctions always beneficial to the company? In particular, which technical and business arrangements must the CIO satisfy to give the organization a lasting advantage in this new field of electronic commerce? The following types of Web-based auctions can be distinguished as shown in Figure 1 and are further described here. Web-based Sales Auctions: One seller offering to as many buyers as allowed into the auction. Example: “Onsale” (www.onsale.com) offers 24-hour, interactive auctioning for all types of computer equipment and consumer electronics by means of an innovative arrangement called a “Yankee-auction.” Bids are sorted in order of price, then quantity, then bid time. When the auction closes, the highest bidder is consid- ered the winner. Web-based Procurement Auctions: One buyer ten- dering his procurement needs via the Internet. Exam- ple: General Electric (www.tpn.geis.com) tenders its procurement needs to a selected set of suppliers via the Internet and subsequently uses auction techniques before issuing orders. Many more large companies as well as government bodies are currently considering or implementing these types of Internet-procurement systems. This requires multicriteria auctioning sys- tems that optimize on price as well as other criteria such as product quality, delivery time, and reliability. Web-based Many-to-Many Auctions: Many sup- pliers offering to many potential buyers. Example: The Arizona Stock Exchange (www.azx.com) offers a call auction for stocks. In a call auction, trading takes place only at certain prearranged times—the “calls.” Between calls, orders accumulate. At the call, a price is established by identifying the supply and demand. Bringing sellers and buyers together at the same time, and at a single price, avoids the market spreads and random turbulence common in continuous markets. Current understanding of Web-based auctions is still limited. There is a significant theoretical base for traditional auctions [5], but the pervasive impact of advanced electronic communications is usually not addressed. Recent research suggests that almost any good or service can be put forward for electronic auc- tioning to the advantage of the business concerned, but this is not without risk [3]. However, the impli- cations for the information and communications sys- COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM July 1998/Vol. 41, No. 7 99 Eric van Heck and Peter Vervest How Should CIOs Deal With Web-Based Auctions? Negotiations using EDI Web-based procurement auctions Web-based sales auctions Web-based many-to-many auctions One Many Buyers One Many Sellers Figure 1. The use of auctions in electronic commerce

description

CACM 1998 article about why CIOs need to understand the challenges of web-based auctions.

Transcript of How Should CIOs deal with Web-based Auctions?

Page 1: How Should CIOs deal with Web-based Auctions?

Exploiting the Internet for commer-cial benefit has become a key themefor Chief Information Officers atmost organizations. Significantadvantages are to be gained for bothsellers and buyers. Savings are madeby reducing transaction costs,

increasing the circle of potential customers as well asby improving the search-and-find capabilities for allparties concerned [1, 2, 4]. Web-based auctioning isa rapidly expanding application of the Internet. Thematching of demand and supply at the best price atone specific point in time is the additional benefit ofa Web-based auction. The advantages, however, mustbe considered against lower switching costs for auc-tion participants. Are auctions always beneficial tothe company? In particular, which technical andbusiness arrangements must the CIO satisfy to givethe organization a lasting advantage in this new fieldof electronic commerce?

The following types of Web-based auctions can bedistinguished as shown in Figure 1 and are furtherdescribed here.

Web-based Sales Auctions: One seller offering to asmany buyers as allowed into the auction. Example:“Onsale” (www.onsale.com) offers 24-hour, interactiveauctioning for all types of computer equipment andconsumer electronics by means of an innovativearrangement called a “Yankee-auction.” Bids aresorted in order of price, then quantity, then bid time.When the auction closes, the highest bidder is consid-ered the winner.

Web-based Procurement Auctions: One buyer ten-dering his procurement needs via the Internet. Exam-ple: General Electric (www.tpn.geis.com) tenders itsprocurement needs to a selected set of suppliers via theInternet and subsequently uses auction techniquesbefore issuing orders. Many more large companies aswell as government bodies are currently considering orimplementing these types of Internet-procurement

systems. This requires multicriteria auctioning sys-tems that optimize on price as well as other criteriasuch as product quality, delivery time, and reliability.

Web-based Many-to-Many Auctions: Many sup-pliers offering to many potential buyers. Example: TheArizona Stock Exchange (www.azx.com) offers a callauction for stocks. In a call auction, trading takes placeonly at certain prearranged times—the “calls.”Between calls, orders accumulate. At the call, a priceis established by identifying the supply and demand.Bringing sellers and buyers together at the same time,and at a single price, avoids the market spreads andrandom turbulence common in continuous markets.

Current understanding of Web-based auctions isstill limited. There is a significant theoretical base fortraditional auctions [5], but the pervasive impact ofadvanced electronic communications is usually notaddressed. Recent research suggests that almost anygood or service can be put forward for electronic auc-tioning to the advantage of the business concerned,but this is not without risk [3]. However, the impli-cations for the information and communications sys-

COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM July 1998/Vol. 41, No. 7 99

Eric van Heck and Peter Vervest

How Should CIOs Deal With Web-Based Auctions?

Negotiationsusing EDI

Web-basedprocurement

auctions

Web-basedsales auctions

Web-basedmany-to-many

auctions

One Many

Buyers

One

Many

Sellers

Figure 1. The use of auctions in electronic commerce

Page 2: How Should CIOs deal with Web-based Auctions?

tems of the organization are of major importance. Inparticular, CIOs must:

• Ensure the integrity and robustness of electronictrade procedures. As the number of potentialtrade partners increases, new technology must beused that ensures automatic auditing and certifi-cation of trade procedures.

• Design and manage the communications andinformation interfaces between trade systems andthe organization’s own procurement and logisticalsystems. Managing the “front-office-to-back-office” interfaces will become a major challenge.CIOs must direct the design and realization oforder fulfillment systems that can handle the newrequirements of managing physical delivery, pay-ment and settlement, tracking and tracing, andproblem handling.

• Demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages ofWeb-based auctions from a technical and businesspoint of view to the marketing, sales, finance, man-ufacturing, purchase, and logistics departments.

Web-based auctions are a new way for an organiza-tion to interact with its market. They will have aprofound impact on the profitability of the firm in

both selling and buying goods and services.Telecommunication and information systems’researchers should combine forces with marketing,purchase, and auction theorists to provide the mul-tidisciplinary support CIOs now require.

References1. Bieber, M. and Isakowitz, T. Designing hypermedia applications. Com-

mun. ACM 38, 8 (Aug. 1995), 26–29.2. Kambil, A. Doing business in the wired world. IEEE Comput. 30, 5 (May

1997), 56–61.3. Klein, S. Introduction to electronic auctions. Int. J. Electronic Markets 7,

4 (Dec. 1997), 3–6.4. Malone, T.W., Yates, J., and Benjamin, R.I. Electronic markets and elec-

tronic hierarchies. Commun. ACM 30, 6 (June 1987), 484–497.5. Milgrom, P. Auctions and bidding: A primer. J. Economic Perspectives 3, 3

(Summer 1989), 3–22.

Eric van Heck ([email protected]) is an assistant professor ofBusiness Telecommunications in the Department of Decision andInformation Sciences at Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Peter Vervest ([email protected]) is a professor of BusinessTelecommunications in the Department of Decision and Informa-tion Sciences at Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or class-room use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed forprofit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation onthe first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute tolists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.

© 1998 ACM 0002-0782/98/0700 $5.00

c

100 July 1998/Vol. 41, No. 7 COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM