How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
-
Upload
counterjihad -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 1/12
ANCIENT QUR’ANIC MANUSCRIPTS
OF SANA’A AND DIVINE DOWNFALL
By, Sujit Das
“ Respect for the faith of sincere believers cannot be allowed either to block or deflect
the investigation of the historians ... One must defend the rights of elementary
historical methodology”.
------- Maxime Rodhinson, 1981; p. 57
(Photo Source: Wikipedia, 2009)
Gerd R Puin’s photo of one Sana'a Qur'an
parchment, showing layered revisions to the Qur’an
Muslims often say that both Old Testament and New Testament are corrupted and seriously changed.
They say, for a Holy Scripture to be authoritative, it has to be preserved without any changes at all,and point to their Qur’an, which claims to have been revealed word by word and letter by letter to
Muhammad by Allah. Qur’an claims, ‘no change there can be in the words of God ’ (10:64) and,
‘there is none that can alter the words (and decrees) of God ’ (6:34).
But then how ridiculous the ‘doctrine of abrogation’ is, by which later revelations cancel previous
ones, as Qur’an (2:106) confirms, ‘revelations… We abrogate or cause to be forgotten’. Also, a Hadith(6:558) from Sahih Bukhari confirmed that Muhammad forgot many verses. Again Sunaan ibn Majah,
(3: 1944) recorded that after Muhammad’s death some revelations were eaten by a goat. How divine
words can be eaten, changed, cancelled or abolished, in spite of Allah’s specific claim in 10:64 and
6:34?
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 2/12
Are not all these claims of Allah self-contradictory? But amazingly; these plain truths do not bother
the Muslims at all. Probably, if we can present another “authentic” Qur’an which is different fromexisting standard form, Muslims will give way to logical thinking.
The devastating truth is that a large number of ancient Qur’anic manuscripts, dating from first centuryof Hijra were discovered in the Great Mosque of Sana’a (Yemen) which significantly differs from the
present standard one. Carbon dating system confirmed that these Qur’ans are not forged one byreligious rivalries. Moreover these Qur’ans were discovered by Muslims, not infidels.
Probably this is the most embarrassing event in Islamic history of 14 centuries.
The Great Mosque of Sana’a is one of the oldest Mosques in Islamic history. The date of building goes back to 6th year of Hijrah when Muhammad entrusted one of his companions to build a Mosque at
Yemen, which was extended and enlarged by Islamic rulers from time to time.
In 1972, during the restoration of this Great Mosque (heavy rain had caused the west wall of the
Mosque to collapse), laborers working in a crown space between the structure’s inner and outer roofs,
stumbled across a amazing grave site, which they did not realize at that time because of ignorance.Mosques do not accommodate graves, and this site contained no gravestone, no human remains and no
funeral relics. It contained nothing more, in fact, apparently looking an unappealing mountain of old
parchment and paper documents, damaged books and individual pages of Arabic text, fused together
by rain and dampness for over a thousand year.
(Photo Source: Dreibholz, 1999, p. 23)
Some of the Qur’anic parchment fragments in the
condition in which they were found.
The ignorant laborers gathered up the manuscripts, pressed them carelessly into some 20 potato sacks,
and set them aside on the staircase of one of the Mosque’s minarets, where they were locked away.The manuscripts would have been forgotten once again, were it not for Qadhi Isma’il al-Akwa, then
the President of Yemeni Antiquities Authority, who realized the potential importance of the find. Al-
Akwa sought international assistance in examining and preserving the fragments, because no scholar in his country was capable of working on this rich find. In 1997, he managed to interest a visiting non-
Muslim German scholar, who in turn persuaded the German government to organize and find a
restoration project.
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 3/12
Soon after the project began, it became clear that the “paper grave” is a resting place for, among other things, tens of thousands of fragments from close to a thousand different codices of the Qur’an, the
Muslim holy scripture. Muslim authorities during early days cherished the belief that worn out and
damaged copies of the Qur’an must be removed from circulation leaving only the unblemishededitions of the scripture for use. Also such a safe place was required to protect the books from looting
or destruction if invaders come and hence the idea of a grave in the Great Mosque in Sana’a, whichwas a place of learning and dissemination of the Qur’an and was in existence from the first century of the Hijrah.
Restoration of the manuscript has been organized and supervised by Gerd R. Puin of Saarland
University, Germany. Puin is a renowned specialist on Arabic calligraphy (the study of fine andartistic handwriting) and Qur’anic paleography (the study of ancient writing and documents). For ten
years he extensively examined those precious parchment fragments. In 1985, his colleague H. C. Graf
V. Bothmer joined him.
Carbon-14 tests date some of the parchments to 645-690 AD. Their real age may be somewhat
younger, since C-14 estimates the year of the death of an organism (parchment is animal skin), and the process from that to the final writing on the parchment involves an unknown amount of time.
Calligraphic dating has pointed to 710-715 AD. Some of the parchment pages seemed to date back to
the seventh and eighth centuries, or Islam’s first two centuries, perhaps the oldest Qur’an in existence.
In 1984, the House of Manuscripts (Dar al Makhtutat) was founded close to the Great Mosque, as part
of a cooperation project between Yemeni and German authorities. An enormous endeavor began to
restore the Qur’anic fragments. Between 1983 and 1996, approximately 15,000 out of 40,000 pageswere restored, specifically 12,000 fragments on parchment and manuscripts dating back to the seventh
and eighth centuries.
(Photo Source: Dreibholz, 1999. p. 22)
Dar al-Makhtutat Library where the newly
acquired Manuscripts and cataloguing are stored.
Until now, only three ancient copies of the Qu’ran are found. The one preserved in the British Library
in London, dates from the late seventh century and was thought to be the oldest one. But the Sana’a
manuscripts are even older. Moreover, these manuscripts are written in a script that originates from the
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 4/12
Hijaz - the region of Arabia where prophet Muhammad lived, which makes them not only the oldest to
have survived, but one of the earliest authentic copies of the Qur’an ever. Hijazi Arabic is the script(Makkan or Madinan) in which the earliest Qur'an was written. Although these pieces are from the
earliest Qur'an known to exist, they are also palimpsests (manuscripts on which the original writing
has been effected for re-use).
The rare style of fine and artistic handwriting had fascinated both Puin and his friend Bothmer butmore surprise was waiting for them. When these ancient Qur’ans were compared with the presentstandard one, both of them were stunned. The ancient texts were found to be devastatingly and
disturbingly at odds with the existing form. There are unconventional verse ordering, small but
significant textual variations, different orthography (spelling) and different artistic embellishment
(decoration).
It scattered the orthodox Muslim belief that the Qur’an as it has reached us today is quite simply “the
perfect, timeless, and unchanging Word of God”. It means Qur’an has been distorted, perverted,revised, modified and corrected, and textual alterations had taken place over the years purely by
Human hands.
The sacred aura surrounding this Holy Scripture of Islam, which remained intact for over 14 centuries
is gone with this astonishing discovery and the core belief of billion plus Muslims that the Qu’ran is
the eternal, unaltered word of God is now clearly visible as a great hoax, a totally downright
falsehood. Not only this; the Qur’anic claim that nobody can alter the words of God is also a fake.Qur’an is supposed to be, if we borrow words from Guillaume (1978, p. 74), “The holy of holies. It must never rest beneath other books, but always on top of them, one must never drink or smoke when
it is being read aloud, and it must be listened to in silence. It is a talisman against disease and
disaster ”. Muslims call the Qur’an ‘Mother of Books’ and believe no other book or revelation can
compare (Caner & Caner, 2002. p.84). However, it’s all gone now. The end result of whole Islamic
struggle for fourteen centuries is a big zero.
As if it is not enough, many manuscripts showed the sign of palimpsests, i.e., versions very clearly
written over even earlier washed off versions. The under-writing of palimpsest is, of course, oftendifficult to read visually, but modern tools such as ultraviolet photography can highlight them. It
suggests that the Sana’a manuscripts are not the only variants, but, even before that, Qur’anic text had
been modified and re-written on the same paper. It means, Allah’s claim (Q 56: 77-78; 85:21-22) that
original text is preserved in heaven on golden tablets, which none can touch except angels is also afairy-tale.
Puin after extensively studying these manuscripts came to the conclusion that the text is actually anevolving text rather than simply the word of God as revealed in its entirety to Muhammad (Warraq,
2002, p. 109). He is thrilled, “So many Muslims have this belief that everything between the twocovers of the Qur’an is just God’s unaltered word. They like to quote the textual work that shows that
the Bible has a history and did not fall straight out of the sky, but until now the Qur’an has been out of
discussion. The only way to break through this wall is to prove that the Qur’an has a history too. TheSana’a’s fragments will help us to do this.”
Puin even concluded (cited Taher, 2000), “ It is not one single work that has survived unchanged through the centuries. It may include stories that were written before the prophet Mohammed began
his ministry and which have subsequently been rewritten”.
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 5/12
During their research, as Puin (Lester, 1999) recalls, “They [Yemeni authorities] wanted to keep this
thing low profile, as we do too, although for different reasons. They don’t want attention drawn to the
fact that there are Germans and others working on the Qur’ans. They don’t want it made public that
there is work being done at all, since the Muslim position is that everything that needs to be said about the Qur’an’s history was said a thousand years ago.”
In fact, Puin and his colleague Bothmer knew for sometime during their study that Qur’an is anevolving text but they wisely understood the possible implications of their findings and kept quiet. If Yemeni authorities come to know about this discovery, they may even refuse them further access. This
is actually what Puin called ‘different reasons’. So both sides kept quiet, and those two scholars
carried on their research unabated.
Puin’s findings also confirm Wansbrough’s assumption on Qur’anic text. During the seventies
Wansbrough concluded that Qur’an evolved only gradually in the seventh and eighth centuries after a
long period of oral transmissions and different sects used to argue furiously with each other on thegenuineness of the revelations. The reason that no Islamic source material from the very beginning of
Islam never survived is because it never existed. In fact Puin admitted ‘rereading Wansbrough’ during
the course of analyzing the Yemeni fragments (Warraq, 2002. p. 122).
Puin's other radical theory is that pre-Islamic sources have entered the Qur’an. He argues that two
tribes it mentions, As-Sahab-ar-Rass (Companions of the Well) and the As- Sahab-al-Aiqa
(Companions of the Thorny Bushes) are not part of the Arab tradition, and the people of Muhammad'stime certainly did not know about them. He also disagrees that Qur’an was written in the purest
Arabic. The very word Qur’an itself is of foreign origin. Contrary to popular Muslim belief, the
meaning of "Qur’an" is not recitation. It is actually derived from an Aramaic word, ‘Qariyun’,meaning a lectionary of scripture portions appointed to be read at divine service. Qur’an contains most
of the biblical stories but in a shorter form and is "a summary of the Bible to be read in service".
Bothmer has painstakingly finished taking more than thirty-five thousand microfilm pictures of thefragments by 1997 and brought the pictures back to Germany (Warraq, 2002. p. 109). It means now
Bothmer, Puin and other scholars will finally have a chance to scrutinize the texts and to publish their findings freely.
Puin is interested to write a book on this in the future, but already wrote several short essays on their
findings in various science magazines, where he pointed out several aberrations between the ancientQur’an and the present standard one (cited Warraq, 2002. p. 739- 44). In refuting the sacredness of
Qur’an, Puin wrote, “My idea is that the Qur’an is a kind of cocktail of texts that were not all understood even at the time of Muhammad. Many of them may even be a hundred years older than
Islam itself . The Qur’an claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen’, or clear. But [contrary to popular belief]
if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply does not make sense…the fact isthat a fifth of the Qur’anic text is just incomprehensible. If the Qur’an is not comprehensible, if it
can’t even be understood in Arabic, then it’s not translatable into any language. That is why Muslims
are afraid. Since the Qur’an claims repeatedly to be clear but is not—there is an obvious and seriouscontradiction. Something else must be going on”.
The extraordinary discovery of Puin had fascinated Andrew Rippin, a Professor of religious studies
and a leading expert on Qur’anic studies. Rippin (cited Warraq, 2002. p.110) concluded, “The impact
of the Yemeni manuscripts is still to be felt. Their variant readings and verse orders are all very
significant. Everybody agrees on that. These manuscripts say that the early history of Qur’anic text is
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 6/12
much more of an open question than many have suspected. The text was less stable and therefore had
less authority, than has always been claimed”.
Rippin’s observation was superb. During the period of early Caliphs, Islam grew as political
movement and not as a religious movement. A book like Qur’an was required to keep the Muslims inunity. Qur’an is just like a ‘status symbol’ of Islam, without which Islam would have died during the
time of Muhammad only. Qur’an is purely manmade. Some sort of Divinity was attached to theQur’an so that it can command some respect because it could not stand on its own worth. This way, inacknowledging the claims of the Qur’an as the direct utterance of the Divinity, the early manipulators
had blocked all the criticism, which can otherwise expose it. Qur’an itself prohibits criticism in the
verses 5:101 and 5:102. We do not know when religious blindness crept in, but undoubtedly, the early
Muslims after Muhammad were more liberal than the present generation we are seeing today. Theauthenticity of many verses had been called into question by the early Muslims themselves. Many
Kharijites, who were followers of Ali in the early history of Islam, found the Sura recounting the story
of Joseph offensive, an erotic tale that cannot belong to the Qur’an (cited Warraq, 1998. p.17).
Warraq (1998, p. 14) has the same view as Rippin, “Muslim scholars of the early years of Islam were
far more flexible in their position, realizing that parts of the Qur’an was lost, perverted and that therewere many thousand variants which made it impossible to talk of ‘the’ Qur’an”.
There is another proof that Qur’anic messages were distorted in the early days of Islam and nothing
like ‘The’ Qur’an does exist any more. Inscriptions of several Qur’anic verses are decorated on theDome of Rock of Jerusalem, which is most probably the first Islamic monument meant to be a major
artistic achievement, built in 691 CE (Whelan, 1998, pp 1-14). These inscriptions significantly differ
from the present standard text (Warraq, 2000, p. 34).
Mingana (cited Warraq, 1998. p.80) lamented, “The most important question in the study of theQur’an is its unchallengeable authority”. This is the only reason; critical investigation of the text of
the Qur’an is a study which is still in its immaturity. As Rippin (1991, p. ix) lamented, “ I have oftenencountered individuals who come to the study of Islam with a background in the historical study of the Hebrew Bible or early Christianity, and who express surprise at the lack of critical thought that
appears in introductory textbooks of Islam. The notion that ‘Islam is born in the clear light of history’
still seems to be assumed by a great many writers of such texts.’ ”
Cook and Crone (1977, p. 18) concluded, “[The Qur’an] strikingly lacking in overall structure,
frequently obscure and inconsequential in both language and content perfunctory in its liking of
disparate materials and given to the repetition of whole passages in variant versions. On this basis, it can be argued that the book is the product of a belated and imperfect editing of materials from a
plurality of traditions.” Crone (cited Warraq, 1998, p. 33) elsewhere wrote , “The Qur’an has
generated masses of spurious information”.
But in case of Bible, it is different, as Rodhinson (1980, p. viii) observed, “[For Bible] the scientific
attitude begins with the decision to accept something as fact only if the source has been proved reliable”. Muslims wrongly interpret the honesty Christians display about some variant readings of the
Bible as weakness (Ali & Spencer; 2003. p. 76-9). Christians, like Hindus, want to see their Holy book through scientific and historical point of view. When old Biblical manuscripts, parchments or ancient
Hindu manuscripts are discovered, Christian and Hindu scholars almost climb over each other’s
shoulder to gain an early access to them. Such findings cause great excitement to them. But sadly, nosuch excitement exists in Islam. Christians and Hindus are eager to see more and more light shed on
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 7/12
the earliest manuscripts of their scriptures, while Muslims resist, often with strong determination. The
contrast is really striking. While both Hindu and Christian faiths are strongly backed up byarcheological and historical evidence; so far neither any archeological exploration was allowed in
Mecca and Medina, nor there is any prospect in the future (Peters, 1986. p. 72-4).
Muslim criticism of Qur’an is very rare and almost nonexistent as Sina (2008, p. 6) lamented,
“Muslims are genuinely incapable of questioning Islam”. Recently the ex-Muslim websites are doingsome remarkable work on this. Ultimately, these enlightened people will successfully free their Muslim brothers and sisters from the Islamic prison. Otherwise whatever criticism is done on Qur’an
are all by the Christian scholars. But Muslims should not take the Christian criticism as a mark of
religious opposition. Christian scholars have done much more criticism of their own religion than
Islam (Sproul & Saleeb, 2003. p. 17; Spencer, 2007, p. 1).
But once the Sana’a findings are published in details, Islam will not be the same as it was for fourteen
centuries. Islam is definitely going to take a strange position. Many Muslims will cast doubt onQur’anic sacredness and the very ‘romantic’ concept of the Qur’an will gradually disappear and then a
very interesting development can be observed. The first question which will appear in their mind is -
which version is superior. But then, it is not possible to choose a Qur’an and discard the other by preference. Because the Muslim belief also confirms that who denies a single verse of the Qur'an
denies the entire revelation. This is a logical impossibility and since scientific research had already
spoken out the truth; many Muslims will seek a way out of this nonsense and will try to free
themselves from the tyrannical oppression of living in a false religion.
While discussing Muslim’s apathy to science, reason and natural law, Jaki (cited Spencer, 2002, p.
127) wrote, “What is occurring in the Muslim world today is a confrontation, not between God and
devil… but between a very specific God and science which is a very specific antagonist of that God,
the Allah of the Qur’an, in whom the will wholly dominates the intellect ”. The Sana’a discovery will
just add fuel to the fire. Today the Muslim world is beset with frustration. Islam is supposed to be the
final revelation and Muslims are supposed to be the “Best of Mankind”, but the reality is just opposite.Muslim nations are poorest in the world (Ohmyrus, 2006, p. 128). A time will come when the religious
authorities will be asked by the common Muslims to refute the critics by logic, science and reason, not by the brutal force or Fatwa. As Parvez Manzoor wrote, “Sooner or later [we Muslims] will have to
approach the Qur’an from methodological assumptions and parameters that are radically at oddswith the ones consecrated by our tradition” (Warraq, 2002, p. 123)
But the Sana’a manuscripts will also provoke another question. If Qur’an is a lie, how the lie survived
for so many centuries? The reason is that the Divinity attached to Qur’an is not ‘A Small Lie’, but
‘The Big Lie’. The big lies are very powerful, and it always has a psychological effect on the listeners.The bigger the lie, the more believable it is. Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kamph (1925), “The broad
mass of a Nation will fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.” Big lies are extraordinarilyconvincible because it offsets the scale of the listener’s commonsense, as Sina (2008, p. 179)explained, an ordinary person does not dare to tell a big lie thinking that it would not be believed and
he would be ridiculed. Since there is no one who had never told a lie in his life, small lies are often
detectable sooner or later. But the big lies are so strange that it often startle the listener. When the lie is
gigantic, the average person is left to wonder how anyone can have the courage, the impudence to saysuch a thing.
Big lies always work wonder in politics. As George Orwell (cites Sina, 2008, p. 179) said,“ Political language … is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable and give an
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 8/12
appearance of solidity to pure wind ”. Today when the divinity of Qur’an is scattered by the Sana’a
manuscripts, the spiritual nature of Islam is also exposed. Islam is nothing but a pure Arab politicalmovement. The Divinity was attached to Qur’an, when Arabs started conquering the surrounding
nations and Islam was imposed on them by force. Arabs not only imposed Islam on others but also
imposed this irrational belief of Qur’anic divinity to the minds of their victims, so that once Arabs aregone, the conquered people cannot come out from this mental enslavement and return back to their
original faith. It is a rare political skill. Many companions of Muhammad clearly knew that Qur’anwas a fake, but they remained with their prophet to share the booty and to enjoy the women. We allknow, after Muhammad’s death, several Arab tribes returned back to their original belief and idolatry
flourished.
With much shock to the Muslims; modern study on Psychology had spoken out the truth thatMuhammad was an imposter, a madman who was suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Narcissists are such self-absorbed persons who are pathological liars. It means, either they are unaware
of their lies or feel completely justified and at easy in lying to others. Their mental condition is suchthat they have that rare capability to believe their own lies (Vaknin, 1999, p. 24).
And, yes, Adolf Hitler, who knew of the power of Big lie and misguided millions of Germans, is alsorecognized as a Narcissist. Today Hitler is the most hatred historical figure in Germany. Like a
mathematical certainty Muhammad will earn the same fate. But we really do not know, how many
million people will die before we can put Muhammad in dustbin with his Allah, Qur’an and Islam
altogether. For Hitler it was National Socialism (another name of Nazism) and for Muhammad it wasIslam, but deep down, both were two sides of same coin – a successful manipulator.
Sina (2008, p. iv, 260) commented, “ Islam is like a house of cards, sustained by lies. All it takes to
demolish is to challenge one of those lies holding it together. It is a tall building, erected on
quicksand; once you expose its foundation, the sand will wash away and this mighty edifice will fall under its own weight ” and again, “ Islam stands on a very shaky ground. It rests on nothing but lies.
All we have to do to demolish it is to expose those lies and this gigantic edifice of terror and deceptionwill collapse.”
Let’s see, once the sacred aura of Qur’an is gone, what other lies are exposed.
First; if there are two or more versions of Qur’an, then there must be equal number of Allahs. So if
only two Qur’ans are authentic, is Islam any longer monotheism? How to decide, which Allah gavewhich Qur’an? If there is only one Allah, then which Qur’an is authentic?
Second; if we still believe that one Qur’an is authentic, then how Allah allowed the others to survive?
Third; is it true anymore that Qur’an (10.64) says Allah’s words do not change - this is indeed themighty achievement? If yes, what more than one Quran is doing now? If not, how this false revelationis recorded in Qur’an? Did Satan put it?
Final; Bukhari (4.52.233) recorded “Unbelievers will never understand our signs and revelations.” But
we see, for understanding the Sana’a Qur’an, the Yemeni authorities invited German scholars becausethere was no one in Yemen capable of working on this rich find.
No wonder Sina (2008) concluded, “ No matter how you look at Islam it turns out to be a foolish
religion.”
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 9/12
Muslims have sold their soul to Muhammad, but can they logically clear the above doubts? The Sana’aepisode had put them in such an awkward position, that even circular reasoning or absurd logic will
not help. Is not it time for prudent Muslims to give a second thought to their cherished faith? Instead
of trying hard to reason out the above doubts, is not it more sensible to agree that a billion plusMuslims had been fooled by a vulgar imposter named Prophet Muhammad? Is not it time for Muslims
to care for what is true? As poet Thomas Gray (cited Sagan, 1997, p. 12) wrote, “… where ignoranceis bliss, “Tis [It is] folly to be wise”.
To protect the Qur’an from more humiliation, Yemeni authorities already debarred Puin and Bothmer
from further examination of those manuscripts. In fact, now they do not allow anyone to see those
manuscripts anymore except some very carefully selected non-Qur’anic parchments, which are atdisplay at the ground floor of Dar al-Makhtutat Library. But this is not going to help. The bird is
already out of the cage and it is useless closing the door now. More than thirty-five thousand
microfilms are out of Yemen before the authorities came to know and already several duplicates aremade. The present author is sure that at this very moment, in some undisclosed location in Germany, a
group of experts are endlessly working on the microfilms and Puin is burning enough midnight oil to
complete his book, which, once published, will hammer another nail in the coffin of Islam. Islam is inreal danger now.
Obviously, by realizing the Divine downfall within sight, many Muslims are disturbed and offended.
The fundamentalists will not accept Puin's and Bothmer’s work as having been done with academicobjectivity, but see it as a deliberate attack on the integrity of the Qu’ranic text (Taher, 2000).
Naturally, those two German scholars will be at forefront of their rage. Puin fears a violent backlash
from orthodox Muslims because of his "blasphemous" theory, which he says, he cannot take lightly.By remembering the Salman Rushdie affair he wrote, “My conclusions have sparked angry reactions
from orthodox Muslims. They've said I'm not really the scholar to make any remarks on thesemanuscripts”. If Puin's views are taken up and trumpeted in the media, and if there are not many
Muslims being rational about it, then all hell may break loose. There will be some hostile response andriots causing much death and destruction, may be another fatwa from Khomeini and surely some
hollow threats from our camera-loving Bin Laden, and his ideological brothers. But can they stop thetruth from spreading?
UNESCO has shown genuine interest in the Sana’a manuscripts ever since the Memory of the World
programme is started. In 1995, the Organization also produced a CD-ROM in Arabic, English andFrench illustrating the history of the collection containing both Qur’anic and non-Qur’ani material.
The CD-ROM offers 651 images of 302 Qur’anic fragments, indexed by script, frames, etc, a general
introduction to the Yemenite manuscripts collections and a brief description on the evolution of Arabiccalligraphy (Abid, 1997).
Ursula Dreibholz, a preservation expert who worked on the Sana’a project for eight years as the chief conservator is much frustrated by seeing the lack of concern of Yemeni authorities to protect those
manuscripts by using modern technology (1983, pp. 30-8). Neither the security devices are correct, nor
is adequate attention being given to the manuscripts to avoid further deterioration (1996, pp 131-45).
In fact, Dreibholz (1999, pp 21-5) said that it was her greatest concern to create a safe and reliable permanent storage system for the restored fragments. Also, there is poor storage hardly any protection
from insects and water. Most importantly, the real problem is the lack of a fire prevention or detection
system, keeping in mind the truly catastrophic fires that have destroyed important libraries andartworks around the world throughout history. The Yemeni authorities said neither they have money
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 10/12
nor means to install such fire protection systems. She does not understand the genuine reason behind
the apathy of Yemeni authorities.
Here Muslim fundamentalists can see a silver lining in the cloud. No one knows when a devastating
fire will break out ‘accidentally’ and destroy all the Qur’anic manuscripts, which are really causingsuch heartburn to them. After all, for saving Islam, Qur’an must be saved for which Muslims will go
any length. If necessary they will burn the Qur’an to save it from logical analysis. Their devotion tostupidity is really that high. Probably, Yemeni authority’s unwillingness to install such fire protectionsystems is an initial preparation for such an act in the future. Never underestimate the destructive
capability of the brainless bigots.
References
Journals:
1. Abid, Abdelaziz (1997); “Memory of the World”: Preserving Our Documentary Heritage.
Museum International, Vol. 49, No. 1, January 1997 issue. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
2. Dreibholz, Ursula (1983); A treasure of early Islamic manuscripts on parchment. Significanceof the find and its conservation treatment . AIC Preprints of papers presented at the 11th annual
meeting in Baltimore, Maryland, 25-29 May 1983. Washington, DC.
3. Dreibholz, Ursula (1996); The Treatment of Early Islamic Manuscript Fragments on
Parchment in The Conservation and Preservation of Islamic Manuscripts, Al-Furqan IslamicHeritage Foundation, London
4. Dreibholz, Ursula (1999); Preserving a treasure: the Sana'a manuscripts. Museum
International. Islamic collections. Vol. LI, No. 3, July 1999 issue. Blackwell Publishers.Oxford.
5. Whelan, Estelle (1998); Forgotten Witness: Evidence for the Early Codification of the Qur’an.
Published in The Journal of America Oriental Society. January to March Issue, 1998.
University of Michigan. USA.
Books:
1. Ali, Daniel & Spencer, Robert (2003); Inside Islam: A guide for Catholics. Ascension Press.Pennsylvania.
2. Caner E. M; Caner E.F (2002); Unveiling Islam. Kregel Publications. Grand Rapids. U.S.A
3. Cook, Michael; Crone, Patricia (1977); Hagarism: The making of the Islamic world .Cambridge.
4. (Dr) Vaknin, Sam (1999); Malignant Self Love: Narcissism Revisited . Narcissus Publications,Skopje. Czech Republic.
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 11/12
5. (Ed.) Warraq, Ibn (1998); The origins of the Koran: Classic Essays on Islam’s holy book .Prometheus Books. NY.
6. (Ed.) Warraq, Ibn (2000); The Quest for Historical Muhammad . Prometheus books. NY.
7. (Ed.) Warraq, Ibn (2002); What the Koran really says – Language, Text and Commentary .Prometheus books. NY.
8. Guillaume, Alfred (1978); Islam. Harmondsworth.
9. Mein Kampf; a 1939 English translation by Houghton Mifflin and edited of verbosity. Reynal& Hitchcock
10. Ohmyrus (2006); The Left and Islam: Tweedledum and Tweedledee in Beyond Jihad: Critical
voices from the inside by Shienbaum, Kim and Hasan, Jamal. Academia Press, LLC, Bethesda.
11. Peters, F.E (1986); Jerusalem and Mecca: The topology of the Holy City in the near east . NY.
12. Rippin, Andrew (1991): Muslims: their religious beliefs and practices. London.
13. Rodhinson, Maxime (1980); Muhammad (Original in French, translated to English by AnneCarter). The New Press. NY
14. Rodhinson, Maxime (1981); A Critical Survey of Modern Studies on Muhammad in Studies on
Islam ed. M. Swartz. Oxford University Press, USA
15. Sagan, Karl (1997); The Demon-Haunted World. Science as a Candle in the Dark . Ballantine
Books. The Random House Publishing group. NY.
16. Sina, Ali (2008); Understanding Muhammad, A Psychobiography. Felibri.com
17. Spencer, Robert (2002); Islam Unveiled: Disturbing questions about the world’s fastest growing faith. Encounter Books. San Francisco.
18. Spencer, Robert (2007); Religion of Peace? Why Christianity is and Islam isn’t . Regnery
Publishing, Inc. Washington DC.
19. Sproul R. C & Saleeb, Abdul (2003); The dark side of Islam. Crossway Books (a division of
Good News Publishers). Wheaton. Illinois.
Internet Sources:
1. Taher, Abul (2000): Querying the Koran. The Guardian. Guardian News and Media Limited.Published on 8th August, 2000. URL:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4048586,00.html (Last accessed 3rd June /
2009)
8/6/2019 How Many Qur'Ans - One, Two or More
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-many-qurans-one-two-or-more 12/12
2. Sina, Ali (2008): Probing Islam. An internet based debate between J. A Ghamidi, K. Zaheer
and Ali Sina, FFI. URL: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/downloads/probing-islam.pdf (Lastaccessed 7th February / 2008).
3. Lester, Toby (1999); What Is the Koran? Atlantic Monthly January 1999 issue. URL:http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/199901/koran (Last accessed 3rd June / 2009).
4. Wikipedia (2009); Gerd R. Puin, URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Cite&page=Gerd_R._Puin&id=287605376
(Last accessed 3rd June / 2009).
Author can be contacted at [email protected]