HOW INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CAN IMPROVE YOUR … · 2018-02-14 · digital revolution. New,...
Transcript of HOW INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CAN IMPROVE YOUR … · 2018-02-14 · digital revolution. New,...
www.ulehssustainability.com
UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2018
The rate of workplace illnesses and injuries has decreased over decades thanks to strong health and safety
awareness programs. Still, according to the International Labour Organization (ILO), 6,300 people worldwide lose
their lives to occupational accidents or work-related diseases each day while millions suffer non-fatal occupational
injuries each year. Organizations across the globe have made vast improvements in their health and safety
programs, but too many people are still harmed or injured. One key to improvement might be found in the
HOW INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CAN
IMPROVE YOUR HEALTHAND SAFETY CULTURE
digital revolution. New, innovative technologies can assist on a journey
to operational excellence. Whether it is a safety management system,
an innovative approach to training, or new approaches to old problems,
each has the ability to aid health and safety professionals in creating
a culture that promotes and values health and safety. Ultimately, what
matters is how a company can use them.
As we embrace these new technologies and ingrain them in our
organizations, we need to understand that perspectives play a pivotal
role in a culture of health and safety. These perspectives can vary from
an older worker, who may not be as familiar with new technologies,
to a younger worker who has been intertwined with technology his or
her entire life. They can differ from the worker who chooses to report
near misses and observations, to the one who ignores them and sees
the overall program as sufficient and acceptable. These differences
in opinion and experience are crucial to consider in the light of new
technologies and potential changes to procedures.
VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING
Workplace training has long been an important tool to improve a com-
pany’s health and safety program. In the past, instructor-led classroom
learning was the primary format and then later, e-learning. Both of
these remain crucial in an organization’s training program. But recent
developments in virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), gami-
fication, and social learning have widened the possibilities to improved
learning and retention.
Consider an employee performing a new job in a highly hazardous en-
vironment. He or she may take an immersive training experience to
learn how to perform the job without danger. The possibility of rec-
ognizing, anticipating, and mitigating hazards prior to actually enter-
ing the environment can provide a “leg up” for the worker. The learner
gets the opportunity to utilize his or her senses and actually “be” in the
moment, without having direct consequences of hazardous situations.
They are provided an identical situation to real life, but only through
immersive, virtual reality training. In most cases, this should deliver a
huge benefit to not only the worker but also the manager, who can en-
sure his employee is receiving vital training and a greater opportunity
to return home safe
WEARABLES
Wearable technology is another tool that can promote worker safety
through continuous monitoring. A study from Goldsmiths, University
of London found, “Employees equipped with wearable technology
reported an 8.5% increase in productivity and a 3.5% rise in job
satisfaction.”
Workers could employ sensors to monitor back injury. The sensors con-
tinuously collect data that can be used to determine if the worker is
HOW INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CAN IMPROVE YOUR HEALTH AND SAFETY CULTURE PAGE 2
www.ulehssustainability.com
UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2017
lifting excessive forces, maintaining an extreme degree bend of the
back, and/or performing excessive repetitive movements. Information
such as this would empower management, and the worker, to have a
greater understanding of what the job entails, and how to best miti-
gate and prevent musculoskeletal disorders.
Other examples of wearable sensors are units that measure airborne
chemicals and alert the worker about dangerous chemical exposure or
wristbands and badges that can detect falls, measure heat exhaustion,
and the level of drowsiness. Heads-up displays can ensure the job is be-
ing done in the safest manner and assist in spotting hazards within the
environment. Another specific example is personal dust monitors that
can continuously monitor and warn the wearer when concentrations
become too extreme. This monitor could play a pivotal role in prevent-
ing coal workers’ pneumoconiosis
Smart glasses are also providing experts the opportunity to “visit”
multiple sites per day even though they are not physically there. By en-
abling a person on-site to wear the glasses, the expert doesn’t have to
travel and spend extra, inefficient time. They can see multiple sites in a
shorter time period and only visit imperative locations when the need
arises.
To add value to this scenario, imagine a team of 20 inspectors that
travel to 10 locations per month for inspections. The average cost per
inspection is roughly $500 and they spend around 60% of their time
generating inspections. If you were able to replace 20% of your in-per-
son inspections with remote capabilities, imagine how much could be
saved.
Initially, the overall efficiency would increase to around 72% instead of
60% and the cost savings would equate to around $240,000 per year.
Although this is merely an example, we are seeing organizations all
over the world use this technology to improve efficiency and enable
greater productivity.
Wearables are truly changing the way jobs are being performed. They
are empowering workers to have more knowledge, faster, and capable
of providing information to keep the worker safe from potential illness
and/or injury. In reducing this risk, they are ultimately able to play a role
in reduction of incidents that occur on the job; which in turn reduces
cost.
That’s not to say obstacles don’t exist. Hindrances such as battery life,
screen sizes, WiFi connectivity, and up-front cost can all be a barrier to
beginning the use of wearables in organizations. But understanding
the potential that this technology can have on the worker and the en-
vironment is truly impactful.
www.ulehssustainability.com
UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2017
HOW INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CAN IMPROVE YOUR HEALTH AND SAFETY CULTURE PAGE 3
get an overview of assessments and corrective action plans. The PURE®
Platform’s native mobile iOS apps can be used to channel information
from site assessments straight into the system. Users can record data
on site using the app, which syncs automatically as soon as it re-con-
nects to the internet, speeding up the process and improving data ac-
curacy. Finally, you can consolidate everything into a single compliance
calendar, and filter by time, task or individual. You can quickly create a
status report or use dashboards to drill down into specific data, har-
nessing the information to drive performance.
UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (DRONES)
Over the last few years, popular use of drones has grown exponentially
as technology improves and the price of drones falls. Furthermore, peo-
ple are beginning to grasp the potential of drones for business purpos-
es. According to research from the Association of Unmanned Vehicle
Systems International, employers in all 50 states are utilizing drones
for more than 40 different business applications. Applications in the
oil and gas industry, emergency management, infrastructure, and cell
tower assistance are all showing the positive impact drones have on
assisting workers.
Imagine working in a confined space and sending in a drone prior to
a human. Most risks can be greatly reduced because the environment
can be assessed prior to entry and the worker can know what is pres-
ent. Specifically, air quality can be determined and visual hazards can
be monitored to provide the worker with an actual “look” into the area.
Another example would be an aerial jobsite survey photograph or vid-
eo. Instead of sending a pilot into the air for this job, a certified operator
can deploy a drone to assess and capture the majority of needs for the
organization. Although new hazards may become present with drone
usage, many have been reduced just by “removing” the human from
the job.
According to the American Heart Association (AHA), the incidence of
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is more than 350,000. When a person
goes into cardiac arrest, their chances of survival drops every minute a
life-saving charge isn’t given. Time is of the essence, and victims don’t
have the time to wait for an ambulance to arrive and provide the atten-
tion needed. This is when a research team from the University of Toron-
to decided to act and decipher ideas of how to cut this time down. The
team studied historical ambulance response times to 56,000 cardiac
arrests that occurred in southern Ontario over a nine year period. The
data delivered impactful information. They found the average ambu-
lance response times were:
• In cities, five to 10 minutes
• In rural communities, could be more than 20 minutes
The team then began to consider the proposition of utilizing drone
technology to deliver automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) and im-
prove survival. They began determining where the drones should be
stationed and how many would be needed to provide efficiency in the
population and reduction in response times versus the ambulances.
What they found, after placing drones in strategic locations through-
out the region, were the drones reduced response times by:
• Six minutes in urban environments
• Ten minutes in the most rural areas
Imagine the impact of this reality. AEDs can be delivered by drones in
a more timely manner, eliminating an emergency responder from hav-
ing to drive excessively fast to the incident and providing the patient a
greater chance of survival.
It is important to mention there are draw-backs with providing an AED
via drone opposed to ambulance services. Primarily, a bystander con-
ducting resuscitation versus a trained emergency technician. Although
the AED delivers instructions for use, errors could occur with individu-
als performing medical services contrasting to professionals.
It’s also essential to understand part of the reality for drone usage. Un-
manned aerial systems are an aviation discipline. In the United States,
commercial drone use is regulated by the Federal Aviation Administra-
tion (FAA) under 14 CFR Part 107; in the United Kingdom, it is regu-
lated by the Civil Aviation Authority. The operators are also legally re-
sponsible for flight safety and accidents and incidents are investigated
by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in the US and Air
Accidents Investigation Branch in the UK. Statistics also point to the
vast majority (around 95%) of what affects a manned aircraft operation
affects UAS. There’s only one difference: the pilot location.
The economic aspect is also enormous for drone usage. Goldman Sachs
has estimated that businesses and government will spend $13 billion
on drones between now and 2020. The overall growth of the market
could jump from $1.3 billion to over $11 billion in 5 years. There’s also
a positive return on investment to consider.
Whitaker Contracting decided to put technology to the test and de-
termine if it would be beneficial to utilize this technology measuring
stockpiles. Initially, they determined how much it costs with human
interaction. Over three sites, it took a full week to collect and analyze
each site. Furthermore, when calculating the overall employee cost,
equipment needed, and third party surveyors to assist, the annual cost
of measuring the stockpiles was around $37,832 with a six times/year
frequency. With the new method of operating drone technology, the
costs were reduced. Time was also positively impacted with each site
being measured within a few hours, increasing the overall frequency
per year. The only equipment needed is the drone and technology as-
sociated with the drone, and there is no need for a third-party surveyor.
Ultimately, using drone technology showed a positive ROI for this com-
www.ulehssustainability.com
UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2017
PAGE 4
pany task. They were able to measure their stockpiles two times more
frequently, while spending four times less time overall as opposed to
the human interaction. Further benefits included the removal of the
human element which reduced potential risk to the worker and the
potential for lost time incidents.
Although there are a plethora of uses and positive results from drone
technology, there are still many adverse factors to consider prior to im-
plementing this technology within your own organization.
EVIDENCE-BASED DECISION MAKING (BIG DATA)
Now what does a company do with all of that data it have collected
from wearables to drones? There are still many more technologies that
exist which can capture continuous data, reveal potential hazards in
the workplace, and assist workers in becoming healthier and safer
workers. Where does that data go? What does it really provide?
Kristian Hammond stated in the Harvard Business Review, “There is a
huge distinction to be made between ‘evidence’ and ‘data.’ The former
is the end game for understanding where your business has been and
where it needs to go. The latter is the instrument that lets us get to
that end game. Data itself isn’t the solution. It’s just part of the path
to that solution.”
Large amounts of data do not necessarily equal high-quality and re-
liable data. Ensuring the data is “worthwhile” is a fundamental piece
of the puzzle. When we validate data, we provide an advantage to our
workers. According to an MIT study, companies that incorporate big
data and analytics into their operations show productivity rates and
profitability that are 5% to 6% higher than those of their peers.
All this data isn’t the “answer” but it can provide evidence to assist an
organization in achieving operational excellence. Data can enable em-
ployees to make more educated and faster decisions, optimize quality
and productivity, and contribute in preventing injuries and illnesses.
This data can bridge gaps and change the way people within an orga-
nization work together. It helps in creating a culture that is looking to
the future and utilizing all necessary tools move processes in a positive
direction.
STRENGTHS AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF TECHNOLOGY
Ultimately, all this technology is meant to be an aid in helping organi-
zations move towards operational excellence. Technology is empower-
ing employees to make decisions that are educated and that have the
potential truly transform not only the workers, but the culture within
the organization. A few critical strengths of new technology are:
• Reduces potential risk to the worker – by taking the human element
out of the job, the hazard will not affect the eliminated worker. In
many instances, the worker might not be completely removed, but
at least the worker can be more informed of the hazards present.
• Allows real-time data collection – enables the workplace to become
significantly safer by capturing hazards, completing audits, and ac-
cessing training documents in real time. The capability of monitor-
ing the worker in “real-time” is available with this time of collection
• Reduces administrative work – data is automatically electronically
transmitted. This reduces Health and Safety professionals having to
spend time entering information in a system and allows them to
allocate more time to the ultimate goal: mitigating hazards in the
workplace and ensuring everyone returns home healthy and safe
every day.
• Provides an easier method to track leading indicators – technolo-
gy allows near misses to be tracked in real-time, easier methods for
training, and allows employees to complete audits and observations
faster.
Unfortunately, even though new technology can provide benefits,
there are also many unintended consequences of this same technolo-
gy. A few unintended consequences of new technology are:
• Removal of the human element – although this is a benefit as well,
there is also a negative impact of removing the human from the job.
How can a tool, such as a drone or sensor, replace a worker who has
many years of expertise? In the short answer, there will be a gap
from this aspect, which is why we must figure out ways to allow the
expertise of the worker to shine, even if their physical presence is
not required.
• Introduction of new hazards to the environment
– Fire and explosions – most wearable technology products rely on
batter power. Lithium-ion batters for example, have the potential
to overheat and explode or burst into flame
– Chemical reactions – extended contact with the skin has the
ability to cause a reaction, which can result in rashes or other
allergic responses.
– Hazardous environments – not powering down radio
transmissions in potentially-explosive environments could lead
to catastrophic consequences.
• Worker behavior (culture) – with an evolving and aging workforce,
how will this technology be adopted by users? Will management
support this type of change?
• IoT Security Issues – the more data that is available, the greater the
risk of exploitable information. A survey conducted by AT&T’s Cyber-
security Insights Report found that 85% of companies were in the
HOW INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CAN IMPROVE YOUR HEALTH AND SAFETY CULTURE
www.ulehssustainability.com
UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2017
PAGE 5
process of or planning on deploying IoT devices. Of those, only 10%
felt confident that they could secure those devices against hackers.
• IoT Privacy – the amount of data that exists today is truly astound-
ing. According to Business Insider, “a Federal Trade Commission re-
port entitled “Internet of Things: Privacy & Security in a Connected
World” found that fewer than 10,000 households can generate 150
million discrete data points every day.” With that enormous amount
of data, the potential for vulnerability is higher than ever.
When we consider implementing a new technology into our process,
deliberate the advantages and disadvantages to what it will do to our
organizations.
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?
Merriam-Webster defines culture as, “the set of shared attitudes, val-
ues, goals, and practices that characterizes an institution or organi-
zation.” How do we truly create a culture of health and safety? What
elements do we need to incorporate? How do we create value for our
workforce?
Properly answering questions such as these, will aid our organizations
in achieving operational excellence. Operational excellence occurs
when a company:
• Has a highly engaged leadership
• Believes in continuous learning
• Views “compliance” as a baseline for where everything should begin
• Is leading indicator-driven
• Has hyper-aware employees
• Use technology as tools
• Values Health & Safety
Reaching operational excellence is about moving beyond compliance
and commitment, and moving towards a culture of health and safety.
It requires understanding how we can utilize our tools and resources
to better our own organizations. Part of that is creating an investiga-
tive mindset. An investigative mindset consists of guiding principles by
which all investigators should function. These principles are:
• Accidents can be prevented
• Addressing causes will prevent similar accidents
• Failures are rooted in work systems
• People generally mean well
An investigative mindset is part of the “process”. When accidents hap-
pen, it’s usually a process that failed; not the worker. Additionally, our
processes should result in three goals: Safety, Quality, and Productivity.
All three of these work together and are what creates an organization
that we want to have. Without safety, our quality and productivity will
suffer; without quality, typically our jobs aren’t going to be as safe and
ultimately productivity will lack as well. Productivity is a parallel com-
parison too, because although our operations and jobs can appear to
produce properly, that doesn’t mean the quality of the job or the safety
of the worker is where they should be.
So why is all this really important?
Because finally, we want to ensure our workers are healthy and safe in
everything they do. We want our organizations to understand the most
important thing they can do is continuously learn. Everyone feels val-
ued and has a responsibility for health and safety and strives to follow
this mindset every day. The culture that embraces learning, will grasp
these new technologies and want to learn how they can be utilized to
improve the workplace. They will understand that utilizing all the tools
available will aid their organizations in having a workplace culture that
succeeds all expectations.
Technology can play a crucial role moving our organizations into the
future. But if we get distracted thinking they are the “answer,” we will
never reach our goal of operational excellence. So think about your
workplace. Consider what elements you need to add value for your
workers. Lastly, understand that health and safety is not a priority, be-
cause priorities change. Instead, make it a value, because values last
forever.
HOW INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CAN IMPROVE YOUR HEALTH AND SAFETY CULTURE
AUTHORLangdon Dement, MS, CSP, AEP, is an EHS Advisor with UL EHS Sustainability
where he supports UL’s mission to promote safe living and working
environments around the world by advising companies on improving safety
and health in the workplace. Langdon has a decade of experience in general
industry, healthcare, and construction projects. In his current position,
responsibilities have included safety program implementation for a variety
of industries, industrial hygiene analysis, ergonomic program development,
and trusted advisory services for international clients and regulatory bodies.
He has also become a frequent speaker and facilitator at health and safety
conferences nationally and internationally. Langdon received his Bachelor
of Science in Biology from Harding University and a Master of Science in
Occupational Safety and Health with an emphasis in Industrial Hygiene (ASAC/
ABET accredited). Langdon holds a certification of Certified Safety Professional
(CSP) and Associate Ergonomics Professional (AEP). He is also an OSHA
Authorized Outreach Trainer for general industry.