HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

56
HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE?

Transcript of HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Page 1: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE?

Page 2: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates

Page 3: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Incarcerations have mostly been for Posession

Page 4: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.
Page 5: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

NOTE: The Increase in Incarceration rates for Drug-related Crime is International

Page 6: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

However, availability of many “Illicit: substances appear unchanged

Page 7: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Cocaine production seems unaffected

Page 8: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Cocaine prices seem stable

Page 9: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

A consideration:Is the War aimed in the right directions?

Page 10: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.
Page 11: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Despite the Laws People Still Use

Page 12: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

How do we measure use of Psychoactive substances?

• A difficult issue-– Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration (SAMHSA): measures drug use prevalence by sponsoring the “National Survey on Drug us and Health” (NSDUH)- (formerly known as the “National Household survey on Drug Use”)• drug use info regarding people of 12 yrs and older

– Data from households from every state and across many demographic variables..n= 68,736 survey respondents

Appendix A. NSDUH methodology

Page 13: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Example-Drug Use Stats- NSDUH a SAMHSA study

(substance abuse and mental Health Services Administration)

Link to 2008 SAMHSA Report

Page 14: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

NSDUH 2008 vs. Our ClassOur Class College Students (2008)

NSDUHin last year last month in Last Year Last month

Alcohol 91.8% 85.7% 70.6% 50.7%MJ 67.3% 59.1% 30.9% 16.5%Hall 24.2% 6.1 % 8.2% 1.7%Stimulants 22.4 % 14.2% 5.8% 1.5%XTC 4.0% 0.0 % 5.1% 1.3%

Page 15: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Drug Use by Students in our class- Cont’

N=49 Ever in the last year?

Percentages/ (Freq)

In the past month? In the past week?

Today?

Alcohol 91.8 /45 85.7/42 71.4 /35 8.1 /4

Marijuana 67.3 /33 59.1/ (29 44.8 /22 10.2 /5

Hallucinogens 24.4 /12 6.1/3 2.0/1 0- THANK-YOU!

Cocaine or amphetamines

22.4 /11 14.2/7 8.1/4 0

XTC 4.0/2 0 0 0

Opiates 26.5 /13 14.2/7 6.1/3 4.0/2

Benzodiazepines 20.4 /10 16.3/8 8.1/4 6.1/3

Page 16: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

ouch!!!

Page 17: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Legal control of drug use has cost a lot

Page 18: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Have U.S. Drug Policies worked to reduce drug use or availability??

Page 19: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Complexities of Drug use, Drug abuse and DRUG TAKING BEHAVIOR

Page 20: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Is there a drug abuse problem in our country?

Page 21: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Does Use Mean Abuse?

Page 22: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

The Spectrum of Use

• Use – Periodic non-problematic use• Misuse – Periodic use• Abuse – A pattern of misuse• Dependence – Compulsive problematic use,

often with physiological dependence

Page 23: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Use

• Many drugs can be used relatively safely• Most people who use drugs do not develop

problems; however, this varies with the type of drug

• Drugs are used for many reasons– Social– Religious– Coping– Experimentation

Page 24: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Misuse

• Periodic circumscribed negative consequences– College students and alcohol– “It only happened once.”– Sometimes the consequences are catastrophic

Page 25: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

What is drug abuse?

• The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual – APA guidelines for diagnostic evaluation of psychological problems– “Substance-related disorders”

Page 26: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Abuse

• Use-related Failure to fulfill obligations• Use in Physically dangerous situations• Use-related Legal problems• Use-related Social/Psychological problems– *Dependence criteria not met– It is assumed that an individual meeting the

criteria for “drug dependence” have already met the criteria for abuse

Page 27: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

What is Drug Dependence?

Page 28: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Dependence

• Tolerance

Page 29: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Tolerance

• After regular use, a larger dose is required to produce a given effect

• A given dose of the drug has less effect upon repetition

Page 30: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Dependence

• Tolerance• Withdrawal syndromes

Page 31: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Physical Dependence

• An adaptive state produced by repeated use of a drug which manifests itself by intense physiological disturbances (withdrawal syndrome) when use of the drug is halted (abstinence).

• Withdrawal syndrome- a constellation of symptoms that occur when an individual stops using the drug to which dependence has developed. Symptoms typically in reverse direction of the effects caused by the drug (considered a “rebound effect.”)

Page 32: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Withdrawal Syndromes

Example: Opiate drugs tend to reduce body temp and decrease activity of the

digestive system.

Opiate withdrawal syndromes include fever, and diarrhea

Page 33: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

For some drugs a withdrawal Syndrome may be associated with

Psychological dependence

• A condition characterized by intense drive or cravings for a drug experienced during periods ob abstinence.– Abstinence: periods of time when the individual has

stopped using

• Now considered the most prominent factor in relapse.– Relapse: return to drug use after a period of abstinence

Page 34: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Dependence

• Tolerance• Withdrawal• Taking more than intended

Page 35: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Dependence

• Tolerance• Withdrawal• Taking more than intended• Unable to successfully cut down or control

Page 36: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Dependence

• Tolerance• Withdrawal• Taking more than intended• Unable to cut down or control• Excessive time spent re: drug– Thinking about, talking about, acquiring etc…

Page 37: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Dependence

• Tolerance• Withdrawal• Taking more than intended• Unable to cut down or control• Excessive time spent re drug• Important activities given up– Loss of interest/motivation/ability

Page 38: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

DSM-IV:Dependence

• Tolerance• Withdrawal• Taking more than intended• Unable to cut down or control• Excessive time spent re drug• Important activities given up• Continuing use despite problems

Page 39: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

How Large is the Problem? Depends how it is measured… Treatment Statistics

Page 40: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Economic Indications

Page 41: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.
Page 42: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

SO ?

• Whatever your perspective on drug use and abuse, its difficult to argue that drug use is in no way problematic.

• Especially when considering the harmful effects of drug addiction/Abuse to the individual and to society.

• Yet the issues are complex and simple approaches are clearly less than optimally effective

Page 43: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Yet there is ample rationale to study drug taking behavior

• It is a social problem• Many drugs can cause physical harm to the

individual• General Insight into behavior• Insight into the functions of the nervous system• Insights into pharmacology of neural transmission

Page 44: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Psychopharmacology

• The Study of Psychoactive Drugs and Their Effects

Page 45: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Names of DrugsBrand, trade, ‘proprietary’ name: e.g., Adderal®different preparations, companies, etc.

Generic, (common) ‘nonproprietary’ name: d-amphetamine

Chemical name: alpha-methylphenethylamine

Street names: e.g..Bennies, black beauties, bumble bees, co-pilots, Crank, Cross tops, Crystal meth, Dexies, Footballs, Hearts, Hot Ice, Ice, L.A. glass, Meth, MDMA, Pep pills, Speed, Uppers

Mostly I will use the generic name.

Page 46: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Example: Valium7-chloro--1-methyl-5-phenyl-3H-1,4-

benzodiazepin-2[1H]-one

diazepam

valium

tranks, downers, blues, yellows

• chemical

• generic

• trade

• street

Page 47: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Classifying Drugs-another difficult issue

– Therapeutic vs. non-therapeutic– Legal vs. illegal– Recreational vs. medicinal– Mechanism of action– Site of action– By origin– By chemical structure– Behavioral effects

Page 48: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Classifying Drugs

• Ultimately, as practiced, the classification of drugs is political/social as much as it is scientific.

• Two most common classifications– Scheduling– Behavioral effects

• Both have associated problems

Page 49: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Behavioral Effects Classification

• Classified by effects on behavior and/or central nervous system– Depressants– Stimulants– Narcotics/Analgesics– Psychedelics

Page 50: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Although the Behavioral class system is generally useful…

• Consider the problem of classification based on behavioral effects.– What is the behavioral effect of alcohol?– What is the behavioral effect of Nicotine?

Page 51: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Nonetheless, the behavioral effect classification system would generally be as follows:

• Depressants• Actions in the nervous system lead to

decreased physiological activity and sedation– Alcohol – – Barbiturates – – Benzodiazepines –

Page 52: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Stimulants

• Increase physiological processes and motor behavior– Cocaine– Amphetamine – – Caffeine – – Nicotine –

Page 53: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Narcotic Analgesics (Opiates)

• increase activity in the endogenous opiate system leading to pain suppression, feelings of euphoria, well-being, and respiratory depression– Heroin – – Codeine – – Morphine – – Vicodin, Percocet, etc. –

Page 54: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Psychedelics

• Alter mood state and perception via action on the CNS. – LSD (acid)– Psylocibin (mushrooms)– Phencyclidine (PCP)

Page 55: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Marijuana-

• Vs. many other drugs, the problems of classification are at least recognized

• In a class by itself– Complex behavioral effects– Main effect is on cannabinoid neurotransmitter

system

Page 56: HOW HAVE FEDERAL LAWS BEEN EFFECTIVE? Escalation in drug-related incarceration rates.

Take-Home Message

• Drug classification systems are only a convenient tool for communicating superficial characteristics of a drug. Almost all classification systems breakdown fairly quickly when deeper consideration is given to the individual drugs within each class.