Enhancing Productivity While Reducing Energy Use in Buildings
How do we make decisions on these critical issues? Business of Government Reducing crime Reducing...
-
Upload
judith-higgins -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of How do we make decisions on these critical issues? Business of Government Reducing crime Reducing...
How do we make decisions on these critical issues?
How do we make decisions on these critical issues?
Business of GovernmentBusiness of Government
Reducing crimeReducing crime Enhancing public Enhancing public
safetysafety Containing costsContaining costs
Managing growthManaging growth Improving Improving
accountabilityaccountability Protecting the Protecting the
environmentenvironment
Performing the Business of Performing the Business of GovernmentGovernment
Improving Decision MakingImproving Decision Making
Providing Better ServicesProviding Better Services
Communicating with CitizensCommunicating with Citizens
Issues Affecting Citizens -Issues Affecting Citizens -
Emergency Response
Wild Fire Management
Happen in Places
Population Growth Washington, DC - Baltimore
To make informed decisions, we have to gather the right information.
To make informed decisions, we have to gather the right information.
…using the best data available.…using the best data available.
Watershed Management Area 6Upper Passaic - Whippany - Rockaway Watershed
New Urban/Built-Up Land in Relationto State Planning Areas
Planning Area TotalAcres
Acres of NewUrban/Built-
Up
Percent of PA isNew Urban/Built-
Up
Percent of NewUrban/Built -
Up
Metropolitan Planning Area (PA 1) 92,892.252 3,362.921 3.6% 40.9%Suburban Planning Area (PA 2) 26,664.177 1826.218 6.8% 22.2%Fringe Planning Area (PA 3) 10,441.724 646.827 6.2% 7.9%Rural Planning Area (PA 4) 1.943 0.000 0.0% 0.0%Environ. Sensitive Planning Area (PA 5) 84,867.534 2331.359 2.7% 28.4%Military Lands 6,026.724 1.706 0.0% 0.0%Parks 14,533.009 48.865 0.3% 0.6%Open Water 793.776 2.004 0.3% 0.0%
Totals 236,221.140 8,219.90 3.5% 100%
State Planning AreasMetropolitan Planning Area (PA1)Suburban Planning Area (PA2)Fringe Planning Area (PA3)Rural Planning Area (PA4)Envir. Sensitive Planning Area (PA 5)MilitaryParkWater
New Urban Lands 1986-1995
Percent New Urban/Built-Up Land Per State Planning Area
PA141%
PA222%
PA48%
PA529%
Watershed Management Area 6Upper Passaic - Whippany - Rockaway Watershed
New Urban/Built-Up Land in Relationto State Planning Areas
Planning Area TotalAcres
Acres of NewUrban/Built-
Up
Percent of PA isNew Urban/Built-
Up
Percent of NewUrban/Built -
Up
Metropolitan Planning Area (PA 1) 92,892.252 3,362.921 3.6% 40.9%Suburban Planning Area (PA 2) 26,664.177 1826.218 6.8% 22.2%Fringe Planning Area (PA 3) 10,441.724 646.827 6.2% 7.9%Rural Planning Area (PA 4) 1.943 0.000 0.0% 0.0%Environ. Sensitive Planning Area (PA 5) 84,867.534 2331.359 2.7% 28.4%Military Lands 6,026.724 1.706 0.0% 0.0%Parks 14,533.009 48.865 0.3% 0.6%Open Water 793.776 2.004 0.3% 0.0%
Totals 236,221.140 8,219.90 3.5% 100%
State Planning AreasMetropolitan Planning Area (PA1)Suburban Planning Area (PA2)Fringe Planning Area (PA3)Rural Planning Area (PA4)Envir. Sensitive Planning Area (PA 5)MilitaryParkWater
New Urban Lands 1986-1995
Percent New Urban/Built-Up Land Per State Planning Area
PA141%
PA222%
PA48%
PA529%
-20000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
Ac
rea
ge
Watershed Management Area 6 (WMA6)Whippany-Upper Passiac-Rockaway Watershed
Land Use /Land Cover Change,1986-1995
Draft Results
1986 Acres 6145.088 1646.023 84530.739 95994.809 6750.856 41153.568
1995 Acres 4795.853 2085.018 78449.861 103764.238 6788.643 40337.470
Net Change -1349.235 438.995 -6080.878 7769.429 37.787 -816.098
Percent Change -21.96% 26.67% -7.19% 8.09% 0.56% -1.98%
Agriculture Barren Land Forest Urban Land Open Water Wetlands
-20000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
Ac
rea
ge
Watershed Management Area 6 (WMA6)Whippany-Upper Passiac-Rockaway Watershed
Land Use /Land Cover Change,1986-1995
Draft Results
1986 Acres 6145.088 1646.023 84530.739 95994.809 6750.856 41153.568
1995 Acres 4795.853 2085.018 78449.861 103764.238 6788.643 40337.470
Net Change -1349.235 438.995 -6080.878 7769.429 37.787 -816.098
Percent Change -21.96% 26.67% -7.19% 8.09% 0.56% -1.98%
Agriculture Barren Land Forest Urban Land Open Water Wetlands
What if there was a tool that could integrate data from diverse sources
— and visually analyze data to support decision making —
many times faster than any other tool?
What if there was a tool that could integrate data from diverse sources
— and visually analyze data to support decision making —
many times faster than any other tool?
A tool that could:A tool that could:
Expand the information base Enhance the analysis of available options Streamline the decision-making process Dramatically improve your ability to select
the best course of action
Expand the information base Enhance the analysis of available options Streamline the decision-making process Dramatically improve your ability to select
the best course of action
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Giving decision-makers the power to make better decisions.
Giving decision-makers the power to make better decisions.
The power to understand complex relationships.
The power to understand complex relationships.
Forsyth County, North Carolina: Water Supplies & Water Delivery System
Forsyth County, North Carolina: Water Supplies & Water Delivery System
The power to plan for tomorrow, based on an accurate picture of today.
The power to plan for tomorrow, based on an accurate picture of today.
The power to present data in a clear, compelling way.
The power to present data in a clear, compelling way.
The power to The power to effectively effectively communicate with communicate with citizenscitizens
What is a Geographic Information System (GIS)?
What is a Geographic Information System (GIS)?
A computer-based data collection, storage and analysis tool that combines previously unrelated information into a comprehensive picture.
A computer-based data collection, storage and analysis tool that combines previously unrelated information into a comprehensive picture.
Methamphetamine Threat: A National Epidemic Reaches Illinois
Eastward Movement
Without GIS:
Minimal knowledge of where methamphetamine incidents were occurring
Unable to track or predict themovement of methamphetamine
i n c r e a s e d a l e r t n e s s p a r a n o i a i n t e n s e h i g h h a l l u c i n a t i o n s a g g r e s s i v e n e rb e h a v i o r i n c r e a s e d h e a r t r a t e e x t r e me r i s e i n b o d y a g g r e s s i vt e mp e r a t u r e (a s h i g h a s l O8 d e g r e e s w h i c h c a n c a u s e b r a i n d a ma g e a n d a n xd e a t h ) u n c o n t r o l l a b l e mo v e me n t s (t w i t c h i n g , j e r k i n g , e t c . . . ) v i o l e n t b e h a v ii n s o mn i a i mp a i r e d s p e e c h d r y , i t c h y s k i n l o s s o f a p p e t i t e a c n e , s o r e s n u md i s t u r b e d s l e e p e x c e s s i v e e x c i t a t i o n e x c e s s i v e t a l k i n g a n x i o u s n e s s n e r v o u s n e s s mo o d i n e s s i r r i t a b i l i t y f a l s e s e n s e o f c o n f i d e n c e a n d p o w e r dd e l u s i o n s o f g r a n d e u r l e a d i n g t o a g g r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r u n i n t e r e s t e d i n f rs e x , o r f o o d a g g r e s s i v e a n d s e v e r e d e p r e s s i o n f a t a l
p o s s i b l e b r a i n d a ma g e d e p r e s s i o n p o o r c o p i n g ah a l l u c i n a t i o n s d i s o r g a n i z e d l i f e s t y l e p e r ma n e n t p s y c h o l o g i c a l a g g r e s s i vE F F E CT S ON S OC I E T Y : c a r c r a s h e s c r i me s f i r e s h a z a r d o u s w a s t e p r o b l e m v i o l e n t a n d a g g r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r w e i g h t l o s s i n s o mn i a b e h a v i o r hr e s e mb l i n g p a r a n o i d s c h i z o p h r e n i a d e c r e a s e d s o c i a l l i f e ma l n u t r i t i o n d ep o o r c o p i n g a b i l i t i e s d i s t u r b a n c e o f p e r s o n a l i t y d e v e l o p me n t l o w e r e d a g gr e s i s t a n c e t o i l l n e s s e s l i v e r d a ma g e s t r o k e i n c r e a s e d a l e r t n e s s p a rb e h a v i o r i n c r e a s e d h e a r t r a t e c o n v u l s i o n s e x t r e me r i s e i n b o d y t e mp e r a t u(a s h i g h a s l O8 d e g r e e s w h i c h c a n c a u s e b r a i n d a ma g e a n d d e a t h ) s t r o k e a nu n c o n t r o l l a b l e mo v e me n t s (t w i t c h i n g , j e r k i n g , e t c . . . ) v i o l e n t b e h a v i o r h a li n s o mn i a i mp a i r e d s p e e c h d r y , i t c h y s k i n l o s s o f a p p e t i t e a c n e , s o r e s n u md i s t u r b e d s l e e p e x c e s s i v e e x c i t a t i o n e x c e s s i v e t a l k i n g a n x i o u s n e s s n e r v o u s n e s s mo o d i n e s s i r r i t a b i l i t y f a l s e s e n s e o f c o n f i d e n c e a n d p o w e r d ed e l u s i o n s o f g r a n d e u r l e a d i n g t o a g g r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r u n i n t e r e s t e d i n f ri n c r e a s e d a l e r t n e s s p a r a n o i a i n t e n s e h i g h h a l l u c i n a t i o n s a g g r e s s i v e n e rb e h a v i o r i n c r e a s e d h e a r t r a t e c o n v u l s i o n s e x t r e me r i s e i n b o d y a g g r e s s i vt e mp e r a t u r e (a s h i g h a s l O8 d e g r e e s w h i c h c a n c a u s e a n d h a ld e a t h ) u n c o n t r o l l a b l e mo v e me n t s (t w i t c h i n g , j e r k i n g , e t c . . . ) v i o l e n t b e h a v ii n s o mn i a i mp a i r e d s p e e c h d r y , i t c h y s k i n l o s s o f a p p e t i t e a c n e , s o r e s n u md i s t u r b e d s l e e p e x c e s s i v e e x c i t a t i o n e x c e s s i v e t a l k i n g p a n i c a n x i o u s n e s s n e r v o u s n e s s mo o d i n e s s i r r i t a b i l i t y f a l s e s e n s e o f c o n f i d e n c e a n d p o w e r
a n x i o uE F F E C T S ON S OC I E T Y : c a r c r a s h e s c r i me s f i r e s e x p l o s i o n s h a z a r d o u s w a s t e
c o n v u l s i o n s
p a n i c
v i o l e n t b e h a v i o rk i d n e y a n d l u n g d i s o r d e r s
e x p l o s i o n s
d e a t h
b r a i n d a ma g e
p a n i c
T h e F a ce o f
1 9 9 9A n n u a l
M e th am p h e tam in eR ep o rt
M E T H
G e o rg e H. Rya nG o ve rno r
Sa m W. No le nDire c to r
Inability to integrate information for tactical enforcement strategies
Inability to quantify the severity of the problem
Methamphetamine Threat: A National Epidemic Reaches Illinois
With GIS:
Able to track all methamphetamine encounters, lab seizures, and sale locations of starting materials
1
21
4
1
6
2
6
30
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
3
3
26
3
1
6
3
1
2
10
2
3
7
2
3
7
1
1
2
22
1
5
6
5
3
3
4
9
3
5
4
4
1
4
1
3
7
1
5
Will
Lee
Pike
Cook
Ogle
McLean
La Salle
Knox
Fulton
Henry
Iroquois
Adams
Bureau
Shelby
Clay
Ford
Edgar
Wayne
Kane
Logan
Livingston
Lake
Peoria
Clark
Fayette
Hancock
Coles
Vermilion
Piatt
Macoupin
Macon
DeKalb
Champaign
Madison
Mason
St. Clair
White
Cass
Perry
Marion
Sangamon
Mercer
Christian
Greene
Jasper
Morgan
Pope
Jackson
Bond
Tazewell
Warren
Union
Clinton
Whiteside
Carroll
Kankakee
McHenry
Saline
Jefferson
Randolph
Grundy
Jo Daviess
JerseyMontgomery
Woodford
Stark
De Witt
Franklin
Monroe
Douglas
Schuyler
McDonough
Scott
Crawford
Stephenson
Hamilton
Brown
Washington
Effingham
Marshall
Winnebago Boone
DuPage
Kendall
Gallatin
Johnson
Menard
Richland
Moultrie
Williamson
Lawrence
Rock Island
Henderson
Calhoun
Massac
Cumberland
Wabash
Pulaski
Hardin
Edwards
Alexander
Putnam
Region I
Region II
Region III
Region IV
D9 D10
D12
D1
D6
D2
D7
D13
D8D14
D19
D18
D20
D11
D5
D21
D17
D22
D16
Dchgo
*Labs are defined as abandoned, stationary, mobile, and box.
Reported Methamphetamine Lab* Seizures 1999Total - 246
1999 Labs
0
1 - 2
3 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 10
11 - 30
County level cluster analyses of locations of methamphetamine encounters
#S9
%U
9
%U
9
%U
=
9
%U
%U
%U
#S
%U
9
%U
9
%U
=
%U
9
#S
GGGG
=
G
=
G
#S
#S
#SDowell
Campbell Hill
ElkvilleVergennes
Ava
Hurst
De Soto
Murphysboro
Carbondale
Gorham
Grand Tower Makanda
Integration of demographic and geographic information for Risk-Model
Methamphetamine Threat: A National Epidemic Reaches Illinois
Results:
Developed a statewide Risk-Model identifying methamphetamine“hot spots”
Obtained federal funds for training, equipment, and lab remediation
Passed new laws increasing penalties for possession of precursor chemicals and actual product
Will
Lee
Pike
Cook
Ogle
McLean
La Salle
Knox
Fulton
Henry
Iroquois
Adams
Bureau
Shelby
Clay
Ford
Edgar
Wayne
Kane
Logan
Livingston
Lake
Peoria
Clark
Fayette
Hancock
Coles
Vermilion
Piatt
Macoupin
Macon
DeKalb
Champaign
Madison
Mason
St. Clair
White
Cass
Perry
Marion
Sangamon
Mercer
Christian
Greene
Jasper
Pope
Morgan
Jackson
Bond
Tazewell
Warren
Union
Clinton
Whiteside
Carroll
McHenry
Kankakee
Saline
Randolph
Jefferson
Grundy
Jo Daviess
Jersey
Montgomery
Woodford
Stark
De Witt
Franklin
Monroe
Douglas
Schuyler
McDonough
Scott
Stephenson
Crawford
Hamilton
Brown
Washington
Effingham
Marshall
Winnebago Boone
DuPage
Kendall
Gallatin
Johnson
Menard
Richland
Moultrie
Williamson
Lawrence
Rock Island
Henderson
Calhoun
Massac
Cumberland
Wabash
Pulaski
Hardin
Edwards
Alexander
Putnam
#S
#S#S #S
#S
Cairo
Thebes
Tamms
27
AbandonedG
Anhydrous Theft9
Box Lab%U
Dealer%
Mobile=
PurchaseH
SeizureÑ
Stationary#S
Unk.#S
City
Cropland
Grassland
Forested Area
Water
Barren Land
No Data
Hotspot
Legend
}
Methamphetamine Threat: A National Epidemic Reaches Illinois
Governor Ryan, Chair of Midwestern Governors Association, hosted Methamphetamine Summit in Fall, 2000
N.C. Department of Public Instruction wanted to manage school buses
more efficiently.
N.C. Department of Public Instruction wanted to manage school buses
more efficiently.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Hit-or-miss route mapping in 107 school districts
Huge inefficiencies
Inability to contain costs efficiently
Hit-or-miss route mapping in 107 school districts
Huge inefficiencies
Inability to contain costs efficiently
Without GIS:Without GIS:
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
With GIS:
Developed pilot program more than 15 years ago
Mandated use of GIS by all districts statewide in 1992
State funding incentives reward efficiency: fewer buses, better routes
With GIS:
Developed pilot program more than 15 years ago
Mandated use of GIS by all districts statewide in 1992
State funding incentives reward efficiency: fewer buses, better routes
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Results:
In the 1994-95 school year:- more than 500 fewer buses were needed statewide than originally estimated- 15,000,000 fewer miles were driven than originally estimated
Between 1990 & 1996:- the state saved over 2,000,000 gallons of fuel
Results:
In the 1994-95 school year:- more than 500 fewer buses were needed statewide than originally estimated- 15,000,000 fewer miles were driven than originally estimated
Between 1990 & 1996:- the state saved over 2,000,000 gallons of fuel
Wildfires 2000 - MontanaWildfires 2000 - Montana
Inconsistent and often out-of-date base Inconsistent and often out-of-date base mapsmaps
Very difficult to integrate various Very difficult to integrate various databasesdatabases
Inability to quickly create special mapsInability to quickly create special maps
Impossible to get a composite overview Impossible to get a composite overview of different and widespread incidentsof different and widespread incidents
Decision making often based on Decision making often based on incomplete or dated informationincomplete or dated information
Inconsistent and often out-of-date base Inconsistent and often out-of-date base mapsmaps
Very difficult to integrate various Very difficult to integrate various databasesdatabases
Inability to quickly create special mapsInability to quickly create special maps
Impossible to get a composite overview Impossible to get a composite overview of different and widespread incidentsof different and widespread incidents
Decision making often based on Decision making often based on incomplete or dated informationincomplete or dated information
Without GIS:Without GIS:
Wildfires 2000 - MontanaWildfires 2000 - MontanaWith GIS: Integration of databases--base maps, satellite Integration of databases--base maps, satellite
images, fire perimeters, power lines, images, fire perimeters, power lines, communication sites, vegetation, terrain data, communication sites, vegetation, terrain data, population, potential fire paths, etc. population, potential fire paths, etc.
Daily Internet updates with situation maps Daily Internet updates with situation maps depicting current informationdepicting current information
Improved strategic overview of multiple incidentsImproved strategic overview of multiple incidents
Ability to share consistent maps and data among Ability to share consistent maps and data among different agenciesdifferent agencies
With GIS: Integration of databases--base maps, satellite Integration of databases--base maps, satellite
images, fire perimeters, power lines, images, fire perimeters, power lines, communication sites, vegetation, terrain data, communication sites, vegetation, terrain data, population, potential fire paths, etc. population, potential fire paths, etc.
Daily Internet updates with situation maps Daily Internet updates with situation maps depicting current informationdepicting current information
Improved strategic overview of multiple incidentsImproved strategic overview of multiple incidents
Ability to share consistent maps and data among Ability to share consistent maps and data among different agenciesdifferent agencies
Wildfires 2000 - MontanaWildfires 2000 - MontanaResults: More efficient decision making about resource More efficient decision making about resource
allocation and response priority settingallocation and response priority setting
Improved firefighter protectionImproved firefighter protection
Better population and property protectionBetter population and property protection
Improved interagency cooperation through Improved interagency cooperation through data sharingdata sharing
Improved daily communication with the Improved daily communication with the public by using custom maps of fire incidentspublic by using custom maps of fire incidents
Results: More efficient decision making about resource More efficient decision making about resource
allocation and response priority settingallocation and response priority setting
Improved firefighter protectionImproved firefighter protection
Better population and property protectionBetter population and property protection
Improved interagency cooperation through Improved interagency cooperation through data sharingdata sharing
Improved daily communication with the Improved daily communication with the public by using custom maps of fire incidentspublic by using custom maps of fire incidents
New Jersey Growth ManagementNew Jersey Growth Management
No quantifiable method for assessing change
Can not assess the statewide effectiveness of land use policies
Can not set land management priorities without integrated information
No quantifiable method for assessing change
Can not assess the statewide effectiveness of land use policies
Can not set land management priorities without integrated information
Without GIS:Without GIS:
Prepared a comprehensive map of Prepared a comprehensive map of open open space to guide the to guide the Governor’s one million acre Governor’s one million acre preservation initiativepreservation initiative
Prepared a comprehensive map of Prepared a comprehensive map of open open space to guide the to guide the Governor’s one million acre Governor’s one million acre preservation initiativepreservation initiative
Prepared State Development-Prepared State Development-Redevelopment PlanRedevelopment Plan
Prepared State Development-Prepared State Development-Redevelopment PlanRedevelopment Plan
Quantified statewidestatewide land use changes from 1986-1996
Quantified statewidestatewide land use changes from 1986-1996
Watershed Management Area 6Upper Passaic - Whippany - Rockaway Watershed
New Urban/Built-Up Land in Relationto State Planning Areas
Planning Area TotalAcres
Acres of NewUrban/Built-
Up
Percent of PA isNew Urban/Built-
Up
Percent of NewUrban/Built -
Up
Metropolitan Planning Area (PA 1) 92,892.252 3,362.921 3.6% 40.9%Suburban Planning Area (PA 2) 26,664.177 1826.218 6.8% 22.2%Fringe Planning Area (PA 3) 10,441.724 646.827 6.2% 7.9%Rural Planning Area (PA 4) 1.943 0.000 0.0% 0.0%Environ. Sensitive Planning Area (PA 5) 84,867.534 2331.359 2.7% 28.4%Military Lands 6,026.724 1.706 0.0% 0.0%Parks 14,533.009 48.865 0.3% 0.6%Open Water 793.776 2.004 0.3% 0.0%
Totals 236,221.140 8,219.90 3.5% 100%
State Planning AreasMetropolitan Planning Area (PA1)Suburban Planning Area (PA2)Fringe Planning Area (PA3)Rural Planning Area (PA4)Envir. Sensitive Planning Area (PA 5)MilitaryParkWater
New Urban Lands 1986-1995
Percent New Urban/Built-Up Land Per State Planning Area
PA141%
PA222%
PA48%
PA529%
New Jersey Growth ManagementNew Jersey Growth Management
With GIS:With GIS:
New Jersey Growth ManagementNew Jersey Growth Management
Assessed relationship of development to water quality in all 21 watersheds
Can project build-out scenarios for all 566 municipalities
Integrated water, sewer and other environmental permits with State Development/Redevelopment Plan
Assessed relationship of development to water quality in all 21 watersheds
Can project build-out scenarios for all 566 municipalities
Integrated water, sewer and other environmental permits with State Development/Redevelopment Plan
Provided land use maps to every local mayor
Provided land use maps to every local mayor
Quantified acres of forests, farms, and wetlands lost over 10 years
Quantified acres of forests, farms, and wetlands lost over 10 years
Results:Results:Results:Results:
-20000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
Ac
rea
ge
Watershed Management Area 6 (WMA6)Whippany-Upper Passiac-Rockaway Watershed
Land Use /Land Cover Change,1986-1995
Draft Results
1986 Acres 6145.088 1646.023 84530.739 95994.809 6750.856 41153.568
1995 Acres 4795.853 2085.018 78449.861 103764.238 6788.643 40337.470
Net Change -1349.235 438.995 -6080.878 7769.429 37.787 -816.098
Percent Change -21.96% 26.67% -7.19% 8.09% 0.56% -1.98%
Agriculture Barren Land Forest Urban Land Open Water Wetlands
-20000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
Ac
rea
ge
Watershed Management Area 6 (WMA6)Whippany-Upper Passiac-Rockaway Watershed
Land Use /Land Cover Change,1986-1995
Draft Results
1986 Acres 6145.088 1646.023 84530.739 95994.809 6750.856 41153.568
1995 Acres 4795.853 2085.018 78449.861 103764.238 6788.643 40337.470
Net Change -1349.235 438.995 -6080.878 7769.429 37.787 -816.098
Percent Change -21.96% 26.67% -7.19% 8.09% 0.56% -1.98%
Agriculture Barren Land Forest Urban Land Open Water Wetlands
Federal Lands Management in UtahFederal Lands Management in Utah Grand Staircase – Escalante National MonumentGrand Staircase – Escalante National Monument
Bureau of Land Management instructed to develop a Bureau of Land Management instructed to develop a permanent management planpermanent management plan
((the first National Monument the BLM would administerthe first National Monument the BLM would administer))
National Monument PlanningNational Monument Planning
Assuring public involvement becomes a Assuring public involvement becomes a difficult task.difficult task.
More chance of resource/use conflicts More chance of resource/use conflicts after implementation.after implementation.
Difficult to visualize and communicate Difficult to visualize and communicate results of planning process.results of planning process.
Without GIS:
National Monument PlanningNational Monument Planning
With GIS:With GIS:
Provided a common data base for all interested partiesProvided a common data base for all interested parties
Data was made public through BLM web site facilitating Data was made public through BLM web site facilitating public involvement at any timepublic involvement at any time
““What if” questions were asked and analyzed (both for What if” questions were asked and analyzed (both for BLM and for public) BLM and for public)
GIS itself became a tool forGIS itself became a tool forpublic comment, planning involvement,public comment, planning involvement,and scenario suggestionand scenario suggestion
National Monument PlanningNational Monument Planning
Final management recommendations passed without major Final management recommendations passed without major conflicts or legal appeals. GIS provided the necessary conflicts or legal appeals. GIS provided the necessary common language, and venue for community involvement.common language, and venue for community involvement.
Results:Results:
Land Exchange in UtahLand Exchange in Utah
State owns scattered parcels State owns scattered parcels throughout Utah. Many in throughout Utah. Many in Parks, Monuments, and Parks, Monuments, and Indian Reservations.Indian Reservations.
School revenue is difficult to School revenue is difficult to generate in many of these generate in many of these protected or inaccessible protected or inaccessible areas.areas.
Exchange state school sections for BLM parcels where revenue can be generated for School Trust.
Without GIS:Without GIS:
Long time period for assessment of tradeoffs between state Long time period for assessment of tradeoffs between state and federal parcels.and federal parcels.
Valuable time spent determining what resources exist on Valuable time spent determining what resources exist on candidate parcels, their extent, and coming to agreement candidate parcels, their extent, and coming to agreement on their value.on their value.
Reports generated by hand for parcel level ownership and Reports generated by hand for parcel level ownership and value.value.
Land Exchange in UtahLand Exchange in Utah
With GIS:With GIS:
Decisions made based on statewide data that is available to Decisions made based on statewide data that is available to anyone (public, private, government). Parcel value and anyone (public, private, government). Parcel value and identification open to scrutiny by all interested parties.identification open to scrutiny by all interested parties.
Ability to analyze, compare, and visualize tradeoff options Ability to analyze, compare, and visualize tradeoff options and resolve conflicts. and resolve conflicts.
GIS provides the tools for analyzing the effects of land GIS provides the tools for analyzing the effects of land exchanges on adjacent areas (wilderness, development, exchanges on adjacent areas (wilderness, development, sensitive species, etc.).sensitive species, etc.).
Land Exchange in UtahLand Exchange in Utah
Utah and Interior Department close one of largest land Utah and Interior Department close one of largest land exchanges in history of US. The state receives revenue exchanges in history of US. The state receives revenue generating parcels, while the BLM consolidates it holdings generating parcels, while the BLM consolidates it holdings in reserved areas.in reserved areas.
400,000 acres are400,000 acres are
exchanged, plus anexchanged, plus an
additional$200,000,000.additional$200,000,000.
““Without good tools and dataWithout good tools and data
this deal would not havethis deal would not have
happened” - Brad Barber,happened” - Brad Barber,
State Planning CoordinatorState Planning Coordinator
Land Exchange in UtahLand Exchange in Utah
Results:
A vision for the present... A vision for the present...
Bringing it all together to support decision making
Aerial Imagery
Elevation
Geodetic Control
Boundaries
Surface Waters
Transportation
Land Ownership
Other Thematic DataOther Thematic DataFramework DataFramework Data
Relationships Among DataRelationships Among DataBuild Once, Use Many TimesBuild Once, Use Many Times
Relationships Among DataRelationships Among DataBuild Once, Use Many TimesBuild Once, Use Many Times
Soils
Sewer Lines
Water Lines
Landcover
Demographics
Flood Zones
Relationships Among DataRelationships Among DataBuild Once, Use Many TimesBuild Once, Use Many Times
Government information is a valuable national Government information is a valuable national resource - OMB A-130resource - OMB A-130
Geographic information is intertwined with the Geographic information is intertwined with the broad field of Information Technologybroad field of Information Technology
Geography serves as the common thread to weave Geography serves as the common thread to weave together diverse data basestogether diverse data bases
80% of government data has spatial component80% of government data has spatial component
Can’t effectively do E-Gov without G-GovCan’t effectively do E-Gov without G-Gov
Geographic Data
Partnerships
Standards
Information Technology
GIS
NSDI
Public Access
A foundation exists for a national approach to develop, maintain, and share geographic data
Data Maintenance
High Speed Networks
Tap into the Power of the National Tap into the Power of the National Spatial Data InfrastructureSpatial Data Infrastructure
LeadershipLeadership– Be a champion - align your organization with the NSDI and Be a champion - align your organization with the NSDI and
determine how it contributesdetermine how it contributes
– Foster collaborative effortsFoster collaborative efforts
CommitmentCommitment– Incorporate geographic components into your organization’s data Incorporate geographic components into your organization’s data
and daily businessand daily business
– Dedicate resources to ensure long term successDedicate resources to ensure long term success
EngagementEngagement– Stay aware of evolving geographic technologyStay aware of evolving geographic technology
– Get involved with national/statewide organizationsGet involved with national/statewide organizations