Houston ISD 2011 magnet school audit Magnet Demographics Charts

8/8/2019 Houston ISD 2011 magnet school audit Magnet Demographics Charts

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/houston-isd-2011-magnet-school-audit-magnet-demographics-charts 1/143

2010-2011 HISD ProjectElementary Magnet Schools

HISD Confidential01/07/2011

*** School receives an additional Unique PUA funding.

Elementary

Current Program Proposed Program Re

6 Askew Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

9 Bell Elementary School SWP Physical Development Non- Magnet

2 Berry Elementary School SWP Environmental Science same same

2 Bruce Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same same

1 Burbank Elementary School SWAS Physical Development Non- Magnet

2 Burrus Elementary School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same

DistrictArea

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type

Remove MMagnet fu

status

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove Mto

Improv

Improv

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove Massociatedlimited bu

Signifiprogra

Programstu

SWP- School Wide ProgramSWAS- School Within A School

SUS- Separate and Unique SchoolSWVP- School Wide Vanguard ProgramDWVP- District Wide Vanguard Program






Elementary

Current Program Proposed Program RecDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



8 Carrillo Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

9 Codwell Elementary School SWAS Fine Arts SWP

3 Cornelius Elementary School SWAS Math/Sci/Tech SWP STEM

3 Crespo Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same same

3 DeZavala Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

Remove MMagnet fun

status

Fine Arts SuzukiViolin

Significprogra

Programstudent eportable

the groconsider a

Violin pro

SignificprograProgram

stu

Improve

Remove MMagnet fun

status






Elementary

Current Program Proposed Program ReDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



8 Dodson Elementary School SWP Montessori MSAP Grant M

1 Durham Elementary School SWP Leadership same IB

5 Elrod Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet

2 Felix Cook Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Non- Magnet

3 SWAS Fine Arts SWP same

MSAP GrantMontessori K-8

Plans are

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove associatelimited b

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove associatelimited b

Garden Villas ElementarySchool

Signifprogr

Programst






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



8 SWP Fine Arts same

1 Harvard Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM/IB

1 Helms Elementary School SWAS Dual Language SWP same

Gregory-Lincoln ElementarySchool (K-8)

Museum MagnetSchool

Considertheme

Changincorporat

diversity The schooplans to

2011. Thinst

Significprogra

Programstu






Elementary

Current Program Proposed Program RDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



5 Herod Elementary School SWAS Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

1 Herrera Elementary School SWP Integrated Technology Non- Magnet

5 Horn Elementary School SWP Academy same

RemoveMagnet f

statu

NeighborhoodSchool

Removeto

Narrow and define

one theme orbecome Non-magnet

Signifprogra

theme fthe Mag

definitiont






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



5 Kolter Elementary School SWAS Foreign Languages SWP same

8 Lantrip Elementary School SWAS Environmental Science SWP same

9 Law Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet

Signifiprogr

Prograexam/teststudent eof by rec

color

Signifiprogr

Programpopulati

z

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove associateno oppor






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



4 Lockhart Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM

5 Longfellow Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same same

5 Lovett Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same Literature

Improv

Develop ProfessMonitoenrollm

distr

Considetheme tocurrently

this instdraw mo

A






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



4 MacGregor Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Non- Magnet

2 Oak Forest Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

9 Parker Elementary School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same

NeighborhoodSchool

Removconsidegiven it

an

RemoveMagnet

statu

Signprog

Progras






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



3 Patterson Elementary School SWP Literature/Fine Arts same Literature

2 SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

5 Poe Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Same Same

Literaturemain the

only the aIncrea

populadiversity

Pleasantville ElementarySchool

Remove MMagnet fu

status

Improv






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



8 Pugh Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM

4 Red Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM

5 Rice Elementary (K-8) SUS Technology same

7 River Oaks Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

Improvenrollm

Monitoenrollmen

dist

DedicatedMagnet

RenamImprov

Remove MMagnet fu

status






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



5 Roberts Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Non- Magnet

1 Roosevelt Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

2 Ross Elementary School SWAS Math/Sci/Tech SWP STEM

NeighborhoodSchool

Removeassociatlimited

RemoveMagnet

statu

Signprog

Prograstude






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



8 Rusk Elementary School (K-8) SWAS Math/Sci/Tech SWP

8 Scroggins Elementary School SWAS Literature/Fine Arts Non- Magnet

STEM/ IB(PYP and MYP)

Signifprogram

ProgchangImpro

enrollme

NeighborhoodSchool

Removeassociatelimited b






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



7 Sinclair Elementary School SWP Communications/Tech same Language Immersion

7 SUS Vanguard Non- Magnet

1 Travis Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

5 Twain Elementary School SWP Literature/Fine Arts Non- Magnet

6 SWAS Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet

Significprogram to

T. H. Rogers ElementarySchool (K-8)

DedicatedDWVP

Remove MMagnet fu

status

Remove M

Magnet fustatus

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove MMagnet program

Valley West ElementarySchool

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove MMagnet

operation






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



7 Wainwright Elementary School SWAS Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet

2 Wesley Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same Pre-engineering

5 SWP Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet

4 Whidby Elementary School SWP Health Science MSAP MSAP

8 SWP Dual Language Same Dual Language

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove Massociatedlimited bu

DesignatMagnet Williams

stu

West University ElementarySchool

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove MM

William Wharton K-8 DualLanguage Academy

Retain cuadd ad

themesstu






Elementary


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



9 SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet

4 Woodrow Wilson Montessori SWP Montessori Same Same

OTE: The Essential Elements of Magnet Schools: 1. Diversity of the Student Population; 2. Unique and Innovative Curriculum;

evelopment/Specialized Teaching Staff (supporting the magnet theme); 5. Dynamic Partnerships (Parent and Community Involv

OTE: Minority Group Isolations - Current demographics are 92% minority and 8$ non-minority

Windsor Village ElementarySchool

Remove Magnet f

statu

Impro






No Not theme-based Yes Recognized Yes Yes

No Yes No Recognized Yes Limited

No Yes No Recognized Yes Yes

No Yes No Yes Limited

No Yes No Recognized Not evident Yes

No Yes No Exemplary Yes Yes

Is the diversity of the student

population within2% of the districtwide average of

92% minority /8%non-minorityrespectively?

Is there evidence of aUnique and

InnovativeThemeBased Curriculum?

Is there Test-Based Criteriafor entrance?

What is theStudent

Achievement:AccountabilityRating: TAKS2009-2010?

Is there evidence of specialized

ProfessionalDevelopment and

Specialized TeachingStaff?

Is there evidence of Dynamic

Partnerships(Parent andCommunity

Involvement)?

Academicallyacceptable












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No Not theme based Yes Recognized Not evident Not evident

No Yes No Exemplary

No Yes No Exemplary Yes Not evident

No Yes No Recognized Yes

No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Yes Not evident

PD is not specific toprogram theme

Improver Parentinvolvement

Improve Parentinvolvement












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No MSAP funded MSAP funded Exemplary MSAP funded MSAP funded

Yes No Recognized Not evident

No Yes No Not evident



Yes, transitioning to anIB PYP

Specific IB PYP PD isneeded


Yes, with universitiesand hospitals












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No No Not evident

No No Exemplary

Yes Yes Recognized Yes Yes

Yes, mission statementshould be reviewed and

include the magnet focus


No evidence for PD formagnet, no evidence of principal leadership for

magnet theme

Yes, and in a feederpattern that gives

students an opportunityto receive an IB diploma,

also very rigorous

Professional learningcommunity, data teams,

seeking authorization tobecome an IB program

Excellent techniqiesfor fundrasing,

attracting donors andunique partnerships

Yes, all the curriculum isonline












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No No Yes Recognized Not evident Yes

No No Recognized Yes

No Yes, 5 themes No Exemplary

Yes, goal forimplemenation of

technology of 25% perday

Yes, recommendexpanding

Magnet coordinatorserves as assistant

principal

Needs to match thefocused Academy

theme












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

Yes Yes Yes Exemplary PD is evident Yes

No No Exemplary Additional is needed

No No Recognized Limited Yes

Yes, however reallyneeds additional

technology

Yes, and increase PD ingardening and

SUStainability

Yes, but not evidentconsistently












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No No Exemplary Yes, evident

No No Recognized Not evident

No No Exemplary Not evident

Yes, leadership sharedcontinuous improvement

of the learning focus

Yes, reported that98% family

participation inquarterly student

projects

Yes, utilize the space tosupport their theme

Theme based PD is notevident

Yes, literacy-based finearts

Evident, teachers have alot of experience yet arts

classes appear to betaught in isolation from

core area courses












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No Yes No Recognized Not evident

No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Yes Yes

No Yes No Exemplary

Principal and magnetcoordinator work well

together

Emphasis onprofessional learning

communities and

collaborative planning

Strong parentinvolvement












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No Yes No Exemplary Evident

No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Yes Yes

No Yes No Recognized

Teachers could benefitfrom theme alike

meetings andconferences

Well trained teacherswith strong arts

curriculum, need trainingin arts integration

Yes, and school shouldseek additional arts

related partners












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No No Exemplary Evident

Yes Yes No Recognized Evident Evident

Yes Yes No Recognized Evident Evident

No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Evident Evident

Yes, new technology andupdated science

materials are needed

Yes, with localmuseums












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No Yes No Exemplary Not evident Not evident

No Not theme based Yes Recognized Evident Evident

No Yes No Exemplary Evident Evident; Needs to

expand












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No Yes No Recognized Evident Increase partnerships

No Yes No Exemplary Not evident Limited












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No Yes No Exemplary Evident Increase partnerships

No No Yes Exemplary Evident

No Not theme based Yes Recognized Evident Evident


No No Recognized Evident Evident

Strong parentpartnerships

Yes, for the after schoolprogram












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

Yes Yes No Not evident Not evident

No Yes No Exemplary Evident Evident


No MSAP MSAP Recognized MSAP MSAP

Yes Yes Yes Recognized Evident


Strong parentinvolvement












What is theStudent







Involvement)?

No Not theme based Yes Recognized Evident

No Yes No Evident Evident

Professional







66% 273 32.31% 146 17.28% 128 77 18

84% 670 86.12% 193 24.81% 102 93 1

98% 530 82.55% 205 31.93% 122 119 34

96% 535 89.32% 162 27.05% 83 83 7

94% 795 96.01% 68 8.21% 100 98 4

94% 198 50.77% 97 24.87% 63 63 6

% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet

% Magnet toEnrollment

2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-Zonedto Enrollment

2010-2011Applications

2010-2011Accepted

Total PrincipalTransfer

Agreements asof 10.29.10






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



93% 177 26.42% 99 14.78% 134 82 76

92% 235 39.23% 110 18.36% 77 77 96

89% 244 25.03% 217 22.26% 112 92 13

96% 744 84.74% 132 15.03% 55 52 6

95% 239 39.05% 156 25.49% 125 68 79






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



93% 315 56.25% 227 40.54% 260 147 15

77% 423 86.50% 203 41.51% 139 137 25

99% 413 84.63% 55 11.27% 48 43 2

96% 646 92.02% 30 4.27% 38 38 Not available

89% 787 83.90% 225 23.99% 90 87 20






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



95% 284 80.68% 116 32.95% 35 34 39

45% 623 90.55% 396 57.56% 257 81 24

71% 322 60.41% 208 39.02% 130 106 21






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



50% 323 43.24% 223 29.85% 264 101 105

97% 849 88.53% 178 18.56% 56 54 51

11% 610 100.00% 159 26.07% 352 79 18






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



23% 331 55.91% 306 51.69% 450 81 5

88% 169 23.57% 97 13.53% 108 79 70

93% 548 74.36% 81 10.99% 60 59






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



80% 623 88.12% 259 36.63% 175 171 22

73% 687 93.72% 288 39.29% 207 145 21

41% 673 98.83% 496 72.83% 437 249 7






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



69% 358 74.12% 299 61.90% 187 109 9

40% 363 47.76% 257 33.82% 261 100 80

53% 605 72.02% 463 55.12% 452 232 13






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



90% 721 87.50% 117 14.20% 54 52 1

94% 97 27.25% 27 7.58% 62 37 4

45% 693 95.59% 212 29.24% 244 56 23






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



96% 496 95.02% 282 54.02% 48 48 77

70% 528 87.85% 358 59.57% 182 115 66

See Middle School 659 98.21% 656 97.76% 596 165

10% 533 78.38% 414 60.88% 560 115 12






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



11% 723 96.92% 157 21.05% 426 32 2

86% 206 33.72% 161 26.35% 82 54 137

95% 162 35.06% 94 20.35% 56 56 71






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



88% 165 30.90% 160 29.96% 221 178 32

93% 542 89.44% 117 19.31% 47 44 22






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



70% 461 86.65% 147 27.63% 91 90 6

See Middle School 270 70.31% 270 70.31% 483 60 Not available

40% 311 42.49% 189 25.82% 269 78 114

16% 764 97.08% 175 22.24% 407 28 31

87% 147 23.60% 58 9.31% 82 55 25






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



82% 181 22.80% 56 7.05% 67 63 76

100% 404 87.07% 59 12.72% 22 21 37

2% 1180 100.00% 66 5.59% 407 24 2

92% 455 94.40% 118 24.48% 150 141

73% 369 86.82% 328 77.18% 191 68 4






% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone



2010-2011Accepted



90% 150 20.03% 79 10.55% 146 60 69

57% 333 68.10% 215 43.97% 272 107 55






50% 543 156% 99% $3,484,876.00 $144,750.00 $530.22

100% 669 116% 101% $3,512,766.00 $335,999.00 $501.49

97% $2,931,274.00 $272,265.00 $513.71

100% 732 82% 82% $2,768,064.00 $312,099.00 $583.36

100% 878 94% 76% $3,695,520.00 $236,498.00 $297.48

100% 690 57% 57% $1,893,788.00 $270,512.00 $1,366.22

%ree/Reduced/Othe

r EconomicDisadvantageLunch Transfer

Agreements

AdjustedPermanentCapacity

PermanentUtilization

Utilization w/T-Buildings

Total SchoolBudget-All Funding

Sources (Actual)

Magnet Budget(Actual)

Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

New buildingunder

construction

New building underconstruction

New buildingunder construction






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

92% 753 89% 78% $2,949,722.00 $101,166.00 $571.56

90% 627 96% 72% $2,622,528.00 $278,930.00 $1,186.94

54% 543 180% 60% $4,280,741.00 $285,666.00 $1,170.76

100% 732 120% 75% $3,929,999.00 $205,306.00 $275.95

89% 815 75% 68% $2,760,542.00 $114,777.00 $480.24






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

100% 941 60% 60% $2,309,360.00 $204,357.00 $648.75

92% 480 102% 63% $2,077,525.00 $148,261.00 $350.50

100% 459 106% 35% $2,317,318.00 $270,993.00 $656.16

Not available 815 86% 86% $2,907,061.00 $18,750.00 $29.02

90% 690 136% 104% $4,230,324.00 $407,622.00 $517.94






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

95% Not available Not available $1,513,452.00 $121,767.00 $428.76

67% 690 100% 100% $2,777,073.00 $186,753.00 $299.76

81% 376 142% 98% $2,171,976.00 $30,000.00 $93.17

see middle school






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

46% 940 79% 58% $3,115,073.00 $195,237.00 $604.45

92% 732 131% 104% $4,044,895.00 $15,000.00 $17.67

17% 857 71% 50% $2,543,898.00 $270,323.00 $443.15






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

86% 836 85% 64% $2,928,966.00 $249,340.00 $400.22

86% 774 95% 95% $3,172,189.00 $340,856.00 $496.15

14% 836 81% 56% $3,019,067.00 $362,559.00 $538.72






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

78% 564 86% 68% $2,190,633.00 $314,168.00 $877.56

36% 795 96% 96% $3,146,850.00 $185,119.00 $509.97

62% 815 103% 98% $3,671,453.00 $418,123.00 $691.11






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

100% 1,045 79% 30% $3,556,014.00 $188,599.00 $261.58

100% 753 47% 47% $1,694,257.00 $129,058.00 $1,330.49

52% 648 112% 89% $3,216,993.00 $369,839.00 $533.68






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

97% 418 125% 83% $2,250,184.00 $143,260.00 $288.83

79% 669 90% 82% $2,503,331.00 $184,785.00 $349.97

33% 648 105% 105% $2,855,447.00 $215,972.00 $405.20

see middle schoolInclude all funding

combined Unique PUAif needed

Combine funding- note that it is K-

8

inlcude as K-8funding






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

0% 543 137% 97% $3,134,983.00 $350,585.00 $484.90

82% $2,687,824.00 $107,328.00 $521.01

100% 397 116% 74% $2,005,978.00 $164,213.00 $1,013.66

need plans -replace on site






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

94% 391 137% NOt available $2,469,110.00 $30,000.00 $181.82

86% 459 132% 132% $2,807,779.00 $255,341.00 $471.11






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

67% 480 111% 64% $2,255,758.00 $228,223.00 $495.06

Not available Not available Not available

31% 669 109% 109% $2,880,079.00 $105,039.00 $337.75

26% 815 97% 97% $3,299,687.00 $320,617.00 $419.66

72% $2,533,492.00 $22,500.00 $153.06

see middle schoolInclude all funding

combined Unique PUAif needed

Combine funding- note that it is K-

8

inlcude as K-8funding

New buildingunder

construction

New building underconstruction

New buildingunder construction






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

79% 438 181% 64% $3,406,472.00 $230,980.00 $1,276.13

100% 565 82% 44% $2,055,798.00 $196,335.00 $485.98

0% 1,045 113% 107% $4,687,858.00 $273,480.00 $231.76

501 96% 68% $2,019,992.00 $135,454.00 $297.70

50% 195 218% 91% $1,988,784.00 $101,480.00 $275.01






%ree/Reduced/Othe


Agreements





Sources (Actual)


Magnet PerPupil

Expenditure(Actual)

90% 543 138% 66% $3,207,495.00 $161,019.00 $1,073.46

44% 313 156% 96% $2,040,409.00 $224,148.00 $673.12



2010-2011 HISD ProjectMiddle School Magnets



MIDDLE SCHOOL

Current Program Proposed Program R

4 Attucks Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP Non- Magnet

1 Burbank Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet

7 Clifton Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM

4 SUS Alternative Non-Magnet

DistrictArea

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type

Removeassociated

Remove Magfunding; R

SignificantSTEM Magnestudent en

dis

Contemporary Learning CenterMiddle School

Schoolclosure

Remove Mag








MIDDLE SCHOOL

Current Program Proposed ProgramDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



3 Deady Middle School SWAS Communications SWP

9 Dowling Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP Non- Magnet

2 Fleming Middle School SWAS Fine Arts same same

Communications/ Journalism

Significant Journalism

i

Removassociate

Improve dto redu






MIDDLE SCHOOL


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



5 Fondren Middle School SWAS Math/Science MSAP IB

8 SWAS Fine Arts SWP Museum Magnet

1 Hamilton Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet

3 Hartman Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM

Magnet S

Gregory-Lincoln Middle School(K-8)

Significantwide M

Remove Mafunding; R

SignificantSTEM Magne

student e






MIDDLE SCHOOL


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



1 Hogg Middle School SWAS Math/Science same Dual Language/IB

2 Holland Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet

8 Jackson Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet

5 Johnston Middle School SWAS Fine Arts same same

2 Key Middle School SWAS Foreign Languages SWP Non- Magnet

Significantly rdual language

with Helms

Remove Magnfunding; Ret

t

Remove Magn

funding; Rett

School exceeshould be m

Neighborhoodo not ex

Remove Massociated M

Ap






MIDDLE SCHOOL


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



4 Lanier Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet

5 Long Middle School SWVP Vanguard SWP 6-12 Medical Significant

2 M. C. Williams Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP

1 Marshall Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same Improve dive

2 Patrick Henry Middle School SWAS Fine Arts Non-Magnet

Remove Magn

funding; Ret

Technology andEngineering

Significantly rschool wide t

Magnet as a fein the school

value added sin sc

NeighborhoodSchool

Remove Massociated Ma

building c






MIDDLE SCHOOL


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



5 Pershing Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same

5 Pin Oak Middle School SWAS Languages same same

6 Revere Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM

5 Rice Middle School (K-8) SUS Technology same Improve di

Monitor div

particulamonitor n

Magnet e

Improve diveliminat

Expand tImprove div

DedicatedMagnet






MIDDLE SCHOOL


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



4 Ryan Middle School SWVP Vanguard SWP Non- Magnet

6 Sharpstown Middle School SWAS Leadership SWP International Studies

3 Stevenson Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM

7 SUS Vanguard Non-Magnet

Removeassociated

A

SignificantlyThe Schoo

Monitor schdiversity in s

mino

T. H. Rogers Middle School(K-8)

DedicatedDWVP

Remove Magfunding; R






MIDDLE SCHOOL


Area

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram

Type



9 Welch Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP

OTE: The Essential Elements of Magnet Schools: 1. Diversity of the Student Population; 2. Unique and Innovative Curriculum

evelopment/Specialized Teaching Staff (supporting the magnet theme); 5. Dynamic Partnerships (Parent and Community InvoOTE: Minority Group Isolations - Current demographics are 92% minority and 8% non-minority.

Health and PhysicalFitness

SignificantlyHealth and

improve div






Recommendation Rationale


No No Yes Exemplary

No Yes No Exemplary

No Yes No Acceptable

Is the diversity of thestudent population

within 2% of thedistrict wide average of 92% minority/ 8% non-minority respectively?



Is there Test-BasedCriteria forentrance?

What is the StuAchievemenAccountabil

Rating: TAKS 22010?

y developing a school-wide accelerated

rogram in the content areas through theApollo support program, students are

more likely to be focused and perform ata higher level.

anguard SW is not considered a Magnetprogram by definition.

An expansion of the current theme tonclude Engineering and Technology willbring the program in line with the top

magnet themes. Increasing the pool of non-minority students should assist in

improving the school's diversity.

Does not meet Magnet programrequirements.













Rating: TAKS 22010?


No No

No No

As the current theme is limited, therecommendation to expand with

mphasis on Journalism (writing) shouldoffer students more opportunities to

explore the entire field of Communications. Changing to a SWPnd implementing aggressive recruiting,iversity should improve. Goal is 2% (-/

+)

y developing a school-wide acceleratedrogram in the content areas through theApollo support program, students are


Yes - audition-basedentrance

AcademicalAcceptable

The school is 100% minority and under-nrolled. Through aggressive marketingand recruiting, increasing the pool of non-minority students should assist in

reducing MGI by 2% each year.















Rating: TAKS 22010?

Same No Yes No

No No

No Yes Recognized


AcademicalUnacceptab

useum Studies is a very popular themefor students and parents. The themeshould boost enrollment and improve

diversity as well.




An expansion of the current theme to

nclude Engineering and Technology willbring the program in line with the topMagnet themes. Increasing the pool of non-minority students should assist in

improving the school's diversity.













Rating: TAKS 22010?


No No Yes Exemplary

No No Yes

No No Recognized


WP affords all students to participate inhe Dual Language program. School hascapacity and diversity of 97/3% shouldbe (-/+) 2% each year over the next 3years. As a Dual Language program,articulated with Helms ES, this goal

hould be achievable and a strong feederpattern established.




Monitor enrollments to ensure alltudents are adequately prepared in theAcademic and Fine Arts curriculum.


y developing a school-wide acceleratedrogram in the content areas through theApollo support program, students are














Rating: TAKS 22010?

No No Yes Recognized

No No Yes Exemplary


No No Recognized

No No

anguard SW is not considered a Magnet

program by definition.

ee district plans in development for a 6-12 articulated program.

Implementing this recommended planwill enhance the academic curriculumand provide for an articulated strand

rom middle to high school. Moving to achool-wide program will allow the schoolo recruit more non-minority students tomprove the diversity toward the district-

wide average.

School is 97%/3% diverse. Recruitmentmust be geared toward improving theurrent diversity (-/+) by 2% each year

over the next three years.


Does not meet Magnet programdefinition.















Rating: TAKS 22010?

No Yes Recognized

No Yes Yes Recognized

Yes Yes No

Yes Yes No Recognized

School is 82%/18% diverse with 98%non-zone students.


chool is 62%/38% diverse. Recruitmentmust be geared toward improving theurrent diversity (+/-) by 2% each year

over the next three years.


magnet themes. Increasing the pool of non-minority students should assist inmproving the school's diversity. School

is only at 68% utilization.

Academical

Acceptable

The school is 97% minority and undernrolled. Through aggressive marketingand recruiting, increasing the pool of non-minority students should assist in

reducing MGI by 2% each year.













Rating: TAKS 22010?

No Yes Exemplary


No Yes No

No Yes Yes Exemplary

y developing a school-wide accelerated

rogram in the content areas through theApollo support program, students aremore likely to be focused and perform at

a higher level.

ans are already in place to become a 6-2 school in combinations with The Highchool for International Studies currently

housed at Sharpstown MS.


Magnet themes. Increasing the pool of on-zoned should assist in improving theschool's diversity. School exceeds

capacity.

Academical

Acceptable














Rating: TAKS 22010?

No No Recognized

ment (Academic Excellence); 4. Professional

y.

With low enrollment and high minoritygroup isolation of 99%/1% respectively,

developing a new initiative andaggressive recruiting should create

nterest and improve diversity. Goal is2% (-/+) each year.





HISD Confidential

01/07/2011


Not evident 506 99% 1% 92% 89 17.59% 16

Evident 1,261 99% 1% 96% 254 20.14% 126

Limited 1,002 93% 7% 85% 474 47.31% 314

Not evident 117 Non available 97 82.91% 97

Is there evidence of Dynamic PartnershipsParent and Community

Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010

% MinorityEnrollment

% Non-MinorityEnrollment

% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010



% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

%

Not evident 872 99% 1% 96% 287 32.91% 37

Yes 1,302 100% 0% 87% 340 26.11% 16

Yes 528 100% 0% 93% 181 34.28% 122




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010



% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

MSAP 608 98% 2% 92% 78 12.83% 28

Limited partnerships 704 98% 2% 88% 96 13.64% 87

Yes 1,392 90% 10% 76% 454 32.61% 395

1,526 99% 1% 91% 307 20.12% 152Limited: recommendincreasing business

partners




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010



% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

Not noted 733 97% 3% 90% 199 27.15% 128

Yes 750 99% 1% 91% 108 14.40% 37

Yes 912 100% 0% 96% 140 15.35% 29

Yes 1,486 85% 15% 62% 704 47.38% 589

Not evident 486 99% 1% 90% 72 14.81% 5




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010



% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

Evident 1,347 63% 37% 33% 891 66.15% 682

Evident 934 96% 4% 96% 76 8.14% 11

441 99% 1% 92% 120 27.21% 7

1,015 97% 3% 94% 257 25.32% 84

Not evident 1,004 98% 2% 96% 181 18.03% 21

At the beginning stages,recommends expansion

Abundance of communitypartners




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010



% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

1,817 82% 18% 53% 454 24.99% 447

1,161 62% 38% 35% 364 31.35% 361

Evident 883 95% 5% 89% 171 19.37% 118

Extensive partnerships 1,145 97% 3% 60% 473 41.31% 467

Community partnerships

evident

Community partners fromseveral language

organizations




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010



% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

Evident 329 99% 1% 92% 12 3.65% 4

Limited 598 64 10.70% 26

Evident 1,396 98% 2% 90% 434 31.09% 279

Evident 846 77% 23% 34% 365 43.14% 365




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October

29, 2010



% Free/ReducedLunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

%

1,098 99% 1% 88% 230 20.95% 90Corporate sponsors andocal performance entities

evident as partners




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011


21 100% 0% 95% 956 53% 44% $2,532,005.00

195 98% 2% 94% 1,144 110% 63% $5,549,762.00

59 97% 3% 80% 938 107% 86% $4,234,122.00

Not available Not available Non available Not available Not available Not available $606,473.00


Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements

% Non-MinorityTransfer

Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other

EconomicDisadvantage Lunch

TransferAgreements



Utilizationw/T-Buildings

Total SchoolBudget-All

Funding Sources(Actual)

See HighSchool




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other


TransferAgreements






65 100% 0% 100% 1,388 63% 63% $3,895,601.00

16 94% 6% 94% 1,256 104% 72% $5,745,968.00

65 100% 0% 98% 1,031 51% 51% $2,575,285.00




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other


TransferAgreements






23 100% 0% 100% 956 64% 44% $2,823,402.00

35 100% 0% 91% 938 75% 75% $1,628,943.00

279 89% 11% 67% 1,069 130% 124% $5,857,649.00

89 100% 0% 93% 1,444 106% 106% $6,413,673.00




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other


TransferAgreements






113 99% 1% 93% 1,013 72% 69% $3,151,564.00

36 100% 0% 92% 919 82% 75% $3,204,412.00

67 100% 0% 97% 1,369 67% 56% $4,060,188.00

131 92% 8% 74% 1,313 113% 72% $6,210,874.00

16 88% 13% 94% 1,256 39% 38% $2,517,096.00




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other


TransferAgreements






61 75% 25% 33% 1,163 116% 106% $5,495,291.00

18 94% 6% 94% 1,088 86% 64% $3,217,611.00

5 100% 0% 100% 975 45% 45% $2,183,291.00

86 99% 1% 92% 1,313 77% 66% $4,244,953.00

11 100% 0% 100% 994 101% 84% $4,343,172.00




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other


TransferAgreements






197 95% 5% 67% 1,631 111% 111% $7,286,614.00

126 67% 33% 32% 1,200 97% 97% $4,648,491.00

48 96% 4% 94% 1,294 68% 68% $3,727,412.00

Not available Not available Non available Not available 1,056 108% 108% $2,448,263.00




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other


TransferAgreements






37 97% 3% 95% 956 34% 34% $1,676,027.00

Not available Not available Non available Not available 1,106 88% 72%

6 100% 0% 100% 1,144 122% 101% $5,929,437.00

Not available Not available Non available Not available 1,368 62% 62% $3,310,909.00




HISD Confidential

01/07/2011



Agreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Other


TransferAgreements






95 100% 0% 88% 863 127% 64% $4,653,990.00



2010-2011 HISD ProjectHigh School Magnets



HIGH SCHOOL Current Program Recommend

8 Austin High School SWAS Teaching professions Non-Magnet

2 SUS Careers same

5 Bellaire High School SWAS World Languages Neighborhood Non-Magnet

DistrictArea

CurrentProgram

Type

ProposedProgram Type

ProposedProgram

Neighborhood/CTE

Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fulow interest (only 8%

enrolled select thprogram) to mee

Barbara Jordan HighSchool for Careers

DedicatedMagnet

Promote CTE and programs. Improvestudent enrollmen

program enrollmcommunity partn

Commission a study

CTE progra

Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fubuilding capacity to m

SWAS- School Within A SchoolSUS- Separate and Unique School






HIGH SCHOOL Current Program RecommendaDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


9 SUS Vanguard Non-Magnet

3 Chavez High School SWAS Non-Magnet

4 SUS Alternative repurpose Non-Magnet

1 Davis High School SWAS Non-Magnet

Carnegie Vanguard HighSchool

DedicatedVanguard

Remove Magnet des

Magnet funding; Retastatus and trans

EnvironmentalScience

NeighborhoodSchool w/ CTE

Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fubuilding capacity to m

Contemporary LearningCenter High School

Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fu

low enrollment a

Hotel RestaurantMgmt


Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fulimited building capa

interest (only 12% enrolled select thprogram) to mee






HIGH SCHOOL Current Program RecommDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


8 Furr High School SWAS Technology/Fine Arts Non-Magnet

8 SUS Law/Criminal Justice same

4 SUS same


Remove Magnetassociated Ma

High School for LawEnforcement andCriminal Justice

DedicatedMagnet

Improve diverenrol

High School forPerforming and Visual

Arts

Performing/VisualArts

DedicatedMagnet

Improve diverenrol






HIGH SCHOOL Current Program RecommenDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


2 Kashmere High School SWAS Music/Fine Arts SWP Non- Magnet

7 Lamar High School SWAS Non-Magnet

7 Lee High School SWAS Modern Humanities SWP Non- Magnet

Remove Magnet dassociated Magnet

the Apollo pr

BusinessAdministration

Neighborhood/CTE

Remove Magnet dassociated Magnetbuilding capacity t

Remove Magnet d

associated Magnetthe Apollo pr






HIGH SCHOOL Current Program RecommeDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


9 Madison High School SWAS Non-Magnet

4 SUS Health Professions same

3 Milby High School SWAS Science Institute Non-Magnet

Meteorology/Space Science


Remove Magnet dassociated Mag

Michael E. DeBakey HighSchool for Health Profess

DedicatedMagnet

Improve diversenrollment; assedevelopment ne

training is the

NeighborhoodSchool w/CTE

Remove Magnet dassociated Mag






HIGH SCHOOL Current Program RecommendDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


1 Reagan High School SWAS Technology Non-Magnet

7 Scarborough High School SWAS Arch/Graphic Design Non-Magnet

Neighborhoodschool w/CTE

Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fulimited building capacriteria. However, th

of high interest to ostudents; therefore

may consider limitingof Principal Agreemenorder to open up spacstudents and thus ad

capacity.


Remove Magnet desassociated Magne







Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


6 Sharpstown High School SWAS Leadership Academy SWP Non- Magnet

4 Sterling High School SWAS Aviation Sciences Non-Magnet

1 Waltrip High School SWAS same same

Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fu

the Apollo prog


Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fulow student interest

Research/ Technology

Improve diversity

enrollment, andachievement. Since

draws a large numberstudents, and the s

focused further warranted. This sch

part of the CTE rev







Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


2 Washington High School SWAS Engineering SWP

9 Westbury High School SWAS Non-Magnet

6 Westside High School SWAS Technology Non-Magnet


Significantly reviseschool- wide tech

engineering s

Fine Arts Coalition(FACES)


Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fubuilding capacity to However, if current T

operational, a reviprogram could be im

Neighborhood/CTE

Remove Magnet desassociated Magnet fbuilding capacity to






HIGH SCHOOL Current Program RecommenDistrict

Area

CurrentProgram

Type


ProposedProgram


2 Wheatley High School SWAS Technology Non-Magnet

9 Worthing High School SWAS Math/Science/Tech same Medical Sciences

4 Yates High School SWAS Communications same

OTE: The Essential Elements of Magnet Schools: 1. Diversity of the Student Population; 2. Unique and Innovative Curriculum; 3. Impro

evelopment/Specialized Teaching Staff (supporting the magnet theme); 5. Dynamic Partnerships (Parent and Community Involvement);

OTE: Minority Group Isolations - Current demographics are 92% minority and 8% non-minority.


Remove Magnet deassociated Magnet f

limited buildingenrollment, and div

criteria

Significantly revise Mto a Medical Scienprogram; Improve

student enro


Significantly revise Mto include journalispartner with Deady

as a feed








No Yes No

No Yes Yes





InnovativeTheme BasedCurriculum?


What is the StudentAchievement:Accountability

Rating: TAKS 2009-2010?

Is therspecializ

DeveSpecia

Does not meet Magnet programrequirements due to low student

interest.

Littlepreparati

teache

As a CTE School with popularofferings, recruitment needs to beggressive for increased enrollmentto be achieved. Develop strongerartnerships and business/industryvolvement. Diversity should reflect

the district-wide average at a

minimum.

AcademicallyAcceptable

Does not meet Magnet programrequirements due to building

capacity.
















Is thespeciali

DeveSpecia

No No Yes


No No No Recognized Appea

No Yes No Appropr

Vanguard SW is not considered aMagnet program by definition.



capacity.

Targetes

Does not meet Magnet programrequirements due to theme and

unique curriculum theme.

Does not meet Magnet programrequirements due to buildingapacity and low student interest.

AcademicallyUnacceptable















Is therespecializ

DevelSpecial

No Yes Yes Weekly


No Yes Yes Recognized


capacity and low student interestonly about 10% of students select

the Magnet program) to meetcriteria. If current T-buildings areperational, survey the communityo determine if hter is interest and

need for a Magnet program.


Diversity should reflect the district-wide average at a minimum.

Diversity should reflect the district-wide average at a minimum.















Is therspecializ

DevelSpecial

No Yes Yes


No Yes No Littl

By developing a school-wide

ccelerated program in the contentareas through the Apollo supportogram, students are more likely toe focused and perform at a higher

level.


Does not meet Magnet programquirements due to limited building

capacity.

PD provd

By developing a school-wideccelerated program in the contentareas through the Apollo supportogram, students are more likely to

e focused and perform at a higherlevel.
















Is therespecialize

DevelSpecial

No Yes No Exemplary

Yes Yes No Exemplary

No Yes No L

Does not meet magnet program

quirements due to limited buildingapacity, low enrollment in Magnet

program (less than 4%), anddiversity to meet criteria.

Diversity should reflect the district-wide average at a minimum. See

comment in Col. M.

Evident, mrelevant

ne

Does not meet magnet programequirements due to low enrollment

(slighthly less than 12%), and

diversity of 99% minority. Sincepace is available, the district maywant to consider a new theme totract a diverse student population.
















Is thespeciali

DeveSpecia

No Yes No

Yes Yes No Recognized

Does not meet magnet programquirements due to limited buildingapacity. However, since this is anextremely popular program, thedistrict should explore options to

continue the program.


Teachermovin

directecent

Does not meet Magnet programrequirements due to lowenrollment/low interest.















Is therspecializ

DevelSpecial

No Yes No

No Yes No Recognized Evide

No Yes No

By developing a school-wide

ccelerated program in the contentareas through the Apollo supportogram, students are more likely toe focused and perform at a higher

level.


Use profeco

Does not meet magnet programequirements due to lack of studentnterest. May consider creating a

future magnet program.

Diversity should reflect the district-wide averge at a minimum. Thereare concerns about building

apacity. The theme and location of the school draws non-zoned

students.


Career tteachers hclaim there

no time f















Is therspecializ

DeveSpecia

No Yes No

No Yes Yes Recognized Evide

No Yes No Limited

This new initiative should attractnew students to the school and

improve diversity in studentnrollment. Diversity should reflect

the district-wide average at aminimum.


Very evidis diverse have univ

who te

Does not meet Magnet programequirements. If current T-buildings

are operational, survey theommunity to determine if there isinterest and need for a Magnet

program.

Does not meet Magnet programquirements due to limited building

capacity.







1,867 99% 1% 94% 164 8.78% 81 4.34

Limited 1,109 98% 2% 80% 1109 100.00% 1105 99.6

Evident 3,461 72% 28% 40% 464 13.41% 462 13.3

s there evidence of ynamic Partnerships

(Parent andCommunity

Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment

as of October29, 2010


% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

Evident with localcolleges








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

Partial 458 56% 44% 28% 458 100.00% 457 99.7

Evident 2,758 98% 2% 87% 413 14.97% 301 10.9

Not evident 583 Not available 445 76.33% 445 76.3

1,674 99% 1% 93% 216 12.90% 138 8.24bundant, business andndustry and university








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

Evident 1,171 97% 3% 93% 124 10.59% 59 5.04

Evident 570 97% 3% 73% 568 99.65% 559 98.0

Evident 654 49% 51% 16% 655 100.15% 642 98.1








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

603 99% 1% 70% 93 15.42% 15 2.49

Extensive 3,268 68% 32% 46% 738 22.58% 710 21.7

Not evident 1,691 96% 4% 88% 126 7.45% 69 4.08








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

Extensive 2,213 100% 0% 77% 85 3.84% 50 2.26

866 92% 8% 48% 865 99.88% 855 98.7

2,190 99% 1% 82% 256 11.69% 192 8.77

Strong parentpartnerships, evidentalso with community

Strong alumnipartnerships








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

Very abundant 2,002 96% 4% 79% 591 29.52% 504 25.1

Extensive 758 94% 6% 77% 43 5.67% 17 2.24








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

Evident 1,277 97% 3% 90% 145 11.35% 51 3.99

Limited 1,089 99% 1% 77% 88 8.08% 32 2.94

Not evident 1,763 88% 12% 70% 521 29.55% 421 23.8








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

908 97% 3% 74% 221 24.34% 144 15.8

Evident but limited 2,163 97% 3% 73% 100 4.62% 68 3.14

3,144 76% 24% 47% 609 19.37% 574 18.2

Yes, with high levelengineering partnersand awards one withcommunity partners

Strong partnershipsnclusive of universities

and business andindustry








Involvement)?

CurrentEnrollment



% Non-Minority

Enrollment

%Free/Reduced

Lunch

2010-2011Total

Magnet


2010-2011Magnet

Non-Zone

% Non-MagnEnroll

Evident 1,082 100% 0% 83% 170 15.71% 55 5.08

Limited partnerships 939 99% 1% 72% 86 9.16% 21 2.24

Limited 1,182 99% 1% 70% 216 18.27% 79 6.68






293 100% 0% 94% 2,156 87% 87% $8,802,541.00 $75,222.0

ot available Not available Not available Not available 1,913 58% 56% $6,175,924.00 $63,436.0

184 79% 21% 39% 2,606 133% 119% $14,154,250.00 $87,480.0

TotalPrincipalTransfergreements

% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth

er EconomicDisadvantageLunch Transfer

Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings

Total SchoolBudget-AllFundingSources(Actual)

MagnetBudget(Actual







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

ot available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available $2,658,097.00 $389,881.

82 96% 4% 84% 2,213 125% 125% $12,168,628.00 $61,664.0

ot available Not available Not available Not available 844 69% 46% $3,628,616.00 $0.00

130 98% 2% 85% 1,538 109% 104% $7,275,661.00 $63,226.0

need new

floor plans -new schoolsat new sites







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

24 100% 0% 92% 919 127% 83% $3,677,092.00 $50,363.0

ot available Not available Not available Not available 675 84% 63% $3,094,948.00 $76,651.0

ot available Not available Not available Not available 713 92% 87% $3,600,768.00 $175,074.







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

39 100% 0% 62% 1,125 54% 49% $2,862,275.00 $70,722.0

12 92% 8% 58% 2,194 149% 149% $13,731,388.00 $83,797.0

53 96% 4% 85% 2,381 71% 57% $7,608,022.00 $60,103.0







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

99 100% 0% 72% 1,481 149% 108% $9,752,218.00 $45,518.0

825 105% 105% $5,104,627.00 $45,207.0

507 99% 1% 85% 3,000 73% 71% $9,640,554.00 $66,871.0







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

273 97% 3% 79% 1,781 112% 112% $8,912,089.00 $211,139.

86 92% 8% 80% 1,069 71% 51% $3,583,832.00 $30,000.0







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

96 98% 2% 94% 1,331 96% 62% $5,352,342.00 $60,883.0

21 100% 0% 71% 1,331 82% 71% $4,793,247.00 $45,363.0

296 94% 6% 75% 1,744 101% 91% $7,797,607.00 $62,898.0







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

61 100% 0% 80% 1,856 49% 47% $4,161,134.00 $224,601.

161 99% 1% 70% 1,856 117% 82% $9,311,594.00 $44,269.0

75 85% 15% 49% 2,381 132% 132% $12,893,093.00 $56,352.0







% MinorityTransfer

Agreements


Agreements

%Free/Reduced/Oth


Agreements



Utilizationw/T-

Buildings


MagnetBudget(Actual

19 100% 0% 84% 1,144 95% 95% $4,790,078.00 $52,720.0

47 100% 0% 79% 1,444 65% 55% $4,170,763.00 $77,730.0

28 100% 0% 54% 2,325 51% 45% $5,119,062.00 $45,833.0



THEME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL

Academy Horn Elementary School

Alternative Contemporary Learning Center Middle School

Arch/Graphic Design Sharpstown Middle School

Aviation Sciences

Business Administration

Careers

Communications Deady Middle School

Communications/Tech Sinclair Elementary School

Dual Language Helms Elementary School

Dual Language William Wharton K-8 Dual Language Academy

World Languages Kolter Elementary School Key Middle School

World Languages Pin Oak Middle School

World Languages

Engineering

Environmental Science Berry Elementary School

Environmental Science Lantrip Elementary School

Fine Arts Bruce Elementary School

Fine Arts Burrus Elementary School

Fine Arts Codwell Elementary School

Fine Arts Crespo Elementary School

Fine Arts Felix Cook Elementary School

Fine Arts Garden Villas Elementary School Dowling Middle School

Fine Arts Gregory-Lincoln Elementary School Fleming Middle School

Fine Arts Longfellow Elementary School Gregory-Lincoln Middle School

Fine Arts Lovett Elementary School Johnston Middle School

Fine Arts MacGregor Elementary School Marshall Middle School

Fine Arts Parker Elementary School Patrick Henry Middle School

Fine Arts Poe Elementary School Pershing Middle School

Fine Arts Roberts Elementary School Welch Middle School



Fine Arts/Literature Patterson Elementary School

Fine Arts/Literature Scroggins Elementary School

Fine Arts/Literature Twain Elementary School

Fine Arts/Music

Health Professions

Health Science Whidby Elementary School

Hotel Restaurant Mgmt

Integrated Technology Herrera Elementary School

Law/Criminal Justice

Leadership Durham Elementary School

Math/Science Attucks Middle School

Math/Science Clifton Middle School

Math/Science Fondren Middle School

Math/Science Hartman Middle School

Math/Science Hogg Middle School

Math/Science M. C. Williams Middle School

Math/Science Revere Middle School

Math/Science Stevenson Middle School

Math/Sci/Tech Cornelius Elementary SchoolMath/Sci/Tech Elrod Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Harvard Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Law Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Lockhart Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Pugh Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Red Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Ross Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Rusk Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Valley West Elementary School



Math/Sci/Tech Wainwright Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech Wesley Elementary School

Math/Sci/Tech West University Elementary School

Modern Humanities

Montessori Dodson Elementary School

Montessori Woodrow Wilson Montessori

Physical Development Bell Elementary School

Physical Development Burbank Elementary School

Science Institute

Teaching professions

Technology Rice Elementary Rice Middle School

Technology

Technology

Technology/Fine Arts

Technology/Research

Vanguard Askew Elementary School Burbank Middle School

Vanguard Carrillo Elementary School Hamilton Middle School

Vanguard DeZavala Elementary School Holland Middle School

Vanguard Herod Elementary School Jackson Middle School

Vanguard Oak Forest Elementary School Lanier Middle School

Vanguard Pleasantville Elementary School Long Middle School

Vanguard River Oaks Elementary School Ryan Middle School

Vanguard Roosevelt Elementary School T. H. Rogers Middle School

Vanguard T. H. Rogers Elementary School

Vanguard Travis Elementary School

Vanguard Windsor Village Elementary School

Meteorology/SpaceScience



HIGH SCHOOL

Contemporary Learning Center High School

Scarborough High School

Sterling High School

Lamar High School

Barbara Jordan High School for Careers

Yates High School

Bellaire High School

Washington High School

Chavez High School

High School for Performing and Visual Arts

Westbury High School



Kashmere High School

Michael E. DeBakey High School for Health Profess

Davis High School

High School for Law Enforcement and Criminal Just

Sharpstown High School

Worthing High School



ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Dual Language William Wharton K-8 Dual Language Academy

Dual Language/IB

Sinclair Elementary School

Codwell Elementary School

IB Durham Elementary School

Literature Lovett Elementary School

Literature Patterson Elementary School

Medical Sciences6-12 Medical

MSAP Whidby Elementary School

ProposedProgram

Apollo-Accelerated

Curriculum forExemplary Schools

(ACES)

Apollo-Accelerated


(ACES)

Apollo-Accelerated


(ACES)

Apollo-Accelerated


(ACES)


LanguageImmersion

Fine Arts SuzukiViolin

Health andPhysical Fitness

MSAP & Apollo-Accelerated


(ACES)



Dodson Elementary School

Museum Magnet Gregory-Lincoln Elementary School (K-8)

Pre-engineering Wesley Elementary School

Non- Magnet Askew Elementary School

Non- Magnet Bell Elementary SchoolNon- Magnet Burbank Elementary School

Non- Magnet Carrillo Elementary School

Non- Magnet DeZavala Elementary School

Non- Magnet Elrod Elementary School

Non- Magnet Felix Cook Elementary School

Non- Magnet Herod Elementary School

Non- Magnet Herrera Elementary School

Non- Magnet Law Elementary School

Non- Magnet MacGregor Elementary School

Non- Magnet Oak Forest Elementary SchoolNon- Magnet Pleasantville Elementary School

Non- Magnet River Oaks Elementary School

Non- Magnet Roberts Elementary School

Non- Magnet Roosevelt Elementary School

Non- Magnet T. H. Rogers Elementary School (K-8)

Non- Magnet Travis Elementary School

Non- Magnet Twain Elementary School

Non- Magnet Wainwright Elementary School

Non- Magnet West University Elementary School

Non- Magnet Windsor Village Elementary School

Non- Magnet Horn Elementary School

Scroggins Elementary School

Same Berry Elementary School

Same Bruce Elementary School

Same Burrus Elementary School

Same Crespo Elementary School

Same Garden Villas Elementary School

Same Helms Elementary School

Same Kolter Elementary SchoolSame Lantrip Elementary School

Same Longfellow Elementary School

Same Parker Elementary School

Same Poe Elementary School

Same Rice Elementary (K-8)

Same Woodrow Wilson Montessori

STEM Cornelius Elementary School

MSAP GrantMontessori K-8

Re-zone or becomeNon-Magnet



STEM Lockhart Elementary School

STEM Pugh Elementary School

STEM Red Elementary School

STEM Ross Elementary School

STEM Valley West Elementary School

Rusk Elementary School (K-8)

STEM/IB Harvard Elementary School

STEM/ IB

(PYP and MYP)




Gregory-Lincoln Middle School (K-8)

Burbank Middle School

Contemporary Learning Center Middle SchoolHamilton Middle School

Holland Middle School

Jackson Middle School

Lanier Middle School

Patrick Henry Middle School

T. H. Rogers Middle School (K-8)

Fleming Middle School

Johnston Middle School

Marshall Middle School

Pershing Middle School

Pin Oak Middle School

Rice Middle School (K-8)

Clifton Middle School



Hartman Middle School

Revere Middle School

Stevenson Middle School

M. C. Williams Middle School



HIGH SCHOOL

Kashmere High School

Lee High School

Sharpstown High School- International Studies

Yates High School

Worthing High School



Carnegie Vanguard High School

Chavez High SchoolContemporary Learning Center High School

Davis High School

Furr High School

Madison High School

Milby High School

Reagan High School

Scarborough High School

Sterling High School

Westbury High School

Wheatley High School

Austin High School

Barbara Jordan High School for Careers

Bellaire High School

High School for Law Enforcement and Criminal Just

High School for Performing and Visual Arts

Lamar High School

Michael E. DeBakey High School for Health ProfessWaltrip High School

Westside High School



Washington High School

Houston ISD 2011 magnet school audit Magnet Demographics Charts

Documents

Transcript of Houston ISD 2011 magnet school audit Magnet Demographics Charts