Housing providers’ approaches to tackling worklessness
description
Transcript of Housing providers’ approaches to tackling worklessness
Housing providers’ approaches to
tackling worklessnessAssessing Value and
Impact
Dave Simmonds, Inclusion
Research findings
Workless social-housing residents – key stats
3.5 million workless social-housing residents = 56% of working age (other tenures = 25%)
Nearly half workless for 12 months+ 35% claiming out of work benefits (other tenures = 8%) Workless social-housing residents 4 times more likely
to have long-term health conditions or disabilities and 6 times more likely to be lone parents than other workless
1.6 million social-housing residents predicted to be on the Work Programme (27% of w/age social-housing residents)
Lots being done by providers Widespread consensus that a housing providers’ role is not just about bricks
and mortar:‘Our vision is to create prosperous communities, enhance life chances and
maximise people’s opportunities – we see employment and skills as critical elements of this.’
88% doing thingsto help residents intowork, most doinglots:
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Childcare provision/support
Jobs targeted specifically at workless people
Enterprise support
Projects providing support to find employment
Apprenticeships
Other information, advice and guidance services
Work experience placements
Money advice
Referrals to other organisations
Training and skills development
Dedicated projects, programmes and interventions Work opportunities
Universal services
Serving residents and communities
Social-housing residents particularlydisadvantaged in labour market, butmost providers donot limit employment and skills activities to their own residents...
...Many will need to improve their knowledge to do this: only 42% know the level of worklessness among tenants or residents
Residents only, 29%
Both residents and the wider
community, 71%
Lots of partnerships, but more engagement needed
Very few housing providers approach worklessness in isolation – they build particularly effective partnerships with other housing providers and with contractors in their supply chains...
...But more engagement with mainstream welfare to work provision is needed:– Only 28% are engaging with/linking up to Work
Programme– 35 housing orgs in WP supply chains = 2% of housing
sector
A wide-ranging approach to capturing value
63% of housing providers have mechanisms in place to review the impact and effectiveness of efforts to tackle worklessness...
...but a wide disparity in approach is preventing housing providers from comparing their work, benchmarking good practice and communicating their successes
The policy context and drivers for change
Welfare and housing reform Universal Credit: more financial responsibility
for tenants, less money to support housing costs and stronger incentives to find and sustain work
More outcome-focused employment support headed up by the Work Programme
Localism Act: new flexibilities to use fixed-term tenancies and limit eligibility, including employment status
Some London boroughs are doing this – e.g. prioritising applicants who are in work or seeking work
Less funding available
A tighter and more outcome-focused delivery landscape
Imperatives to join-up provision and avoid duplication
More worklessness activities funded internally, providers have greater freedom to prioritise residents
Recommendations
Recommendations to housing providers
Short term: work collectively to understand and benchmark worklessness among residents, in order to target opportunities and interventions and link up with mainstream provision
Longer term: establish and articulate the sector’s role or roles in a resident’s journey from worklessness into employment
Recommendations to prime welfare to work contractors
Short term: ensure that subcontracting terms allow housing providers to focus on the areas in which they operate and the groups with which they work best
Longer term: collaborate rather than compete in small areas with high concentrations of social housing and, where appropriate, contract housing providers to manage delivery in these areas
Recommendations to government
Short term: commit to making some information on tenants’ receipt of Housing Benefit available to housing providers following the transition to Universal Credit.
Longer term: reward housing providers for reducing worklessness among residents on a payment by results basis