Housekeeping Notes: • Click Join with Audio to be able to ... · 5/12/2020 · biomass-fired...
Transcript of Housekeeping Notes: • Click Join with Audio to be able to ... · 5/12/2020 · biomass-fired...
Housekeeping Notes:
• Click Join with Audio to be able to hear the panelists
• Use Q&A for questions to panelists
• Use Chat to Sarah for Technical Issues
• Presentation will be live-streamed on YouTube,
and recorded and posted on POWERmag.com.
Market Insights – Spring Report
Providing Asset and Operations Performance Management and Remote Operations software solutions to leading Power Generators across the globe
Learn more at:www.ge.com/digital/applications/remote-operations
The changing Midwest gridDr. Renuka Chatterjee, MISO
MISO’s regional portfolio evolution will have a direct impact on planning processes, markets and operational tools
6
47%27%
15%
3%8%
2030 Generation Mix (% MWH)
2018 Generation Mix (% MWH)
27%
28%9%
4%
32%
Renewables
2030 projection compiled from IRPs, investor reports and other sources
76%
7%13%
4%0%
2005 Generation Mix (% MWH)
Other Nuclear Gas Coal
Generator Interconnection requests reinforce the expectation of a resource portfolio shift
• Resource interconnection queue consists of 70 GW
• Renewables (solar and wind) account for over 56 GW of these requests
• Significant amounts of renewable projects are expected to continue to enter into the queue
• From 2018 to 2019, solar requests increased from 34.4 GW to 51.2 GW
7
.
As of 4/16/20
Meanwhile, the controllable resources that have historically been used to balance the system are retiring
8
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Generation Retirement Trend by Fuel Type(Capacity in MW)
Coal Gas Nuclear Oil Diesel Other
13 7 242 98 234
786 1081 1024 880 931
1929
7001
953
4410 4575
170
73%22%
2%2% 0% 1%
Total Approved Retirements since 2005 (24.3 GW)
2,999
Future announced retirements of select
members, through 2030
515
4,231
9
As the composition of the resource fleet shifts, the reliability needs of the system change…
January 17, 2018 September 15, 2018 January 31, 2019
Cold weather in South
Region, excess generation
in the North/Central
Regions unable to move
south due to transmission
limitation.
Unseasonably warm
temperatures in the South
Region resulted in higher
load than anticipated; forced
outages impacted
generation availability.
Historic cold in the North
and Central Regions drove
high load conditions; excess
generation in the South
Region unable to move
north due to transmission
limitation
$300-$1000
$100-$300
$60-$100
$40-$60
$20-$40
$(10)-$20
$(1000)-$(10)
$/MWh
…creating a reliability imperative for change
10
Transitional and transformational enhancements must be made today to planning, operations and markets
to ensure continued reliable and efficient operations
• )Industry trends are
accentuating existing reliability challenges
Policy and resource planning decisions are being made now (IRPs,
retirements, investments)
The pace and scope of change is accelerating
with increased diversity across member fleets
11
Member A Member C Member DMember B
Renewables CoalGas NuclearOther
Additionally, MISO must account for and leverage diversity among members and their individual fleets
Figures show utilities’ total energy generated by fuel type, in megawatt-hours. Current figures compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence. 2030 projections compiled from IRPs, investor reports and other sources.
Cur
rent
G
ener
atio
n M
ixA
nnou
nced
203
0 G
ener
atio
n M
ix
12
The evolving resource mix creates three primary areas of need: Availability, Flexibility and Visibility
Our 2020 focus is on near-term steps that will address both current and longer-term needs
13
Operating HorizonPlanning Horizon Identify Reliability Needs
Importance
2020 Focus
Stakeholders require better information to inform planning and investment decisions
Market prices must better reflect underlying system conditions
Define system reliability needs and capabilities
Develop sub-annual planning + PRA reform
Enhance resource accreditation
Propose scarcity pricing reforms
Annual LOLE does not address 24/7 risk with portfolio evolution
LOLE = Loss of Load Expectation
PRA = Planning Resource Auction
Needs
Define planning constructs that complement state and member roles in Resource Adequacy
Improve pricing for existing productsDevelop necessary new processes, tools and products
Develop analytic methods to define reliability criteria Identify needed attributes in addition to peak hour MWs
13
Base 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Rene
wab
le In
tegr
atio
n Co
mpl
exity
Renewable Energy Penetration Levels
Resource Adequacy
Energy Adequacy (Hourly)
Operating Reliability (Steady State)
Operating Reliability (Dynamics)
Total Traditional Reliability Issues
14
The Renewable Integration Impact Analysis (RIIA) indicates system and operational risks increase sharply beyond 30% renewable penetration
Inflection point
Resource Unavailability
Traditional Congestion Issues / Resource Inflexibility
Grid Instability
ERCOT: Current Outlook and Future Developments
Kenan ӦgelmanVP Commercial OperationsERCOT
Electric Power Conference and ExhibitionMay 12, 2020
PUBLIC
Capacity, Demand and Reserves (CDR) Report: Longer-Term Outlook
• Despite COVID-19 impacts, ERCOT region is still forecasted to experience load growth
• Planning reserve margin for summer 2020 increased to 10.6 % as reported in the December CDR; load forecast will be adjusted to reflect COVID-19 impact
• Peak load forecast for summer 2020 may exceed the record set in August 2019
• Majority of new generation projects are renewable and small, flexible gas-fired resources
16
PUBLIC
Natural Gas
53.8%
Coal16.4%
Nuclear5.2%
Wind21.3%
Solar1.0%
Storage0.1%
Other2.1%
Forecasted Summer Installed Resource Capacity in ERCOT
17
• Summer installed generation capacity information provided by December CDR Reports for 2017, 2018, and 2019.
• Reflects operational installed capacity ― excludes units designated as indefinitely mothballed or under extended outage, and accounts for rating changes reported by resource owners.
• Other category includes hydro, biomass-fired units, and DC tie capacity.
2018 Generating Capacity
Capacity available:94,693 MW
2019 Generating Capacity
Capacity available:96,405 MW
Natural Gas
53.6%
Coal15.2%
Nuclear5.1%
Wind22.3%
Sola…Storage0.1%
Other2.1%
Natural Gas
52.8%
Coal14.5%
Nuclear5.1%
Wind23.3%
Solar2.2%
Storage0.1%
Other2.0%
2020 Generating Capacity
Capacity available:97,858 MW
PUBLIC
Looking Ahead: Planned Project Resource Mix
Other planned
resources
CDR-eligibleplanned
resources
18
85.5 GW24.9 GW
• Installed capacity data from November 2019 GIS report.
• *Other includes DC tie capacity, hydro, biomass, petroleum coke (pet coke), hydroelectric, fuel oil, geothermal energy, other miscellaneous fuels reported by developers, and fuel cells that use fuels other than natural gas.
Gas0.8 GW
Wind14.3 GW
Solar9.5 GW
Storage0.3 GW
Gas5.1 GW
Wind17.9 GW
Solar55.2 GW
Storage7.0 GW
Other0.4 GW
PUBLIC
Closer Look at Aug. 12 – Peak Day
19
-1,000
4,000
9,000
14,000
-10,000
10,000
30,000
50,000
70,000
90,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
G, H
, and
I (M
W)
A, B
, C,
D, E
and
F (M
W)
Hour Ending
Hourly Average Demand, Capacity, and Reserves on 8/12/2019
A: Outages B: Quick-Start ResourcesC: Off-Line D: Renewable HSLE: Non-renewable HSL F: Load
PUBLIC
Battery Energy Storage in ERCOT
• Expect an increasing number of Energy Storage Resources (ESRs) to be built
• ERCOT goals for integrating ESRs include:– Increase system awareness of storage device operation and limitations in the control room
– Identify and reduce barriers to energy and ancillary service markets
– Adapt ERCOT system models to facilitate the integration of storage technologies
• The development of operational and market design policies to include ESRs is being considered in the Battery Energy Storage Task Force (BESTF)– Will be implemented in the short term under a “combination model” structure
– Developing rules to use a “single model” structure long-term
20
PUBLIC
ERCOT Goals for Managing Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) on the Grid
21
• Improved reporting
• Mapping of larger DERs to the transmission grid
– Requires cooperation among TSPs, DSPs, REs and the ISO
– Will improve situational awareness
– Underway now
• Nodal pricing for larger DERs
– Registered DGs (>1 MW) are currently paid Load Zone price
– Local price signals would enhance reliability and would align DER behavior with overall market design.
PUBLIC
Impacts of COVID-19 on Peak Demand and Energy Usage
• ERCOT is performing a weekly COVID-19 load impact analysis; results are varied, and easing of some state bans may change results going forward
• Daily peaks have seen no impact on some days and decreased between 2 and 5% on other days
• Weekly energy use has generally decreased between 2 and 5%
22
PUBLIC
ERCOT Communication Channels
23
ERCOT website – www.ercot.com• Today’s Outlook and grid conditions• Daily and seasonal weather• Market information, prices and more
Social media – join us!• Twitter: @ERCOT_ISO• Facebook: Electric Reliability Council of Texas• LinkedIn: ERCOT
ERCOT mobile app • Real-time updates• Wholesale pricing• Information sharing
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Emilie NelsonEXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
May 12, 2020
Market Insights:Spring Report
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 25
The Mission of the New York Independent System Operator, in collaboration with its stakeholders, is to serve the public interest and provide benefits to consumers by:
• Maintaining and enhancing regional reliability
• Operating open, fair and competitive wholesale electricity markets
• Planning the power system for the future
• Providing factual information to policymakers, stakeholders and investors in the bulk power system
www.nyiso.com
2
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 26
NYISO Markets
26
§ The NYISO supports reliability through three complementary markets for energy, ancillary services, and capacity. • Each addresses distinct reliability
needs through competitive market pricing that benefit New York consumers while reducing costs.
• Together, energy, ancillary services, and capacity market revenues provide economic signals for new investment, retirement decisions, and participation by demand response providers.
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 28
Tale of Two Grids
28
2018 Regional Energy Production Profiles
UPSTATE
DOWNSTATE
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2929
Peak Demand vs. Average LoadPeak vs. Average Load in New York State: 2000-2018
2000-2018• The Bulk Power System
must be capable of reliably meeting peak demand, which occurs in the summer months in NYS
• On average, demand on the Bulk Power System is significantly below peak levels
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 3030
Electric Vehicle Energy & Peak Impacts Forecast
2019-2039• EV adoption rates
are expected to increase annual energy use on the grid by 4.2 million MWh by 2030
• Summer 2030 demand impact 410 MW
• Winter 2030 demand impact 650 MW
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 31
A Grid in Transition - Reliability Considerations
31
§ New York’s decarbonizationpolicies are creating new challenges to meet NYISO’s mission to support a reliable and economically efficient electric system.
Reliability Challenges§ Balance Supply & Demand§ Maintain Ten-Minute Operating
Reserves§ Maintain Total Thirty-Minute
Operating Reserves§ Manage Daily Energy Needs§ Secure Transmission Operations
with Congestion Management§ Coordinate System Restoration
and Black Start§ Manage Voltage Support§ Maintain Frequency Response§ Maintain Resource Adequacy§ Coordinate Supply Outages
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 32
New York State’s clean energy goals: A Grid in Transition
32
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 33
A Grid in Transition – Path Forward
33
§ The NYISO’s wholesale markets can serve as an effective platform for achieving New York State environmental objectives.• Through active engagement with stakeholders and policymakers,
the NYISO is developing design improvements to meet the future challenges expected to arise with high levels of intermittent renewable and distributed energy resources.
§ The plan includes a set of market design enhancements that work together coherently and efficiently to satisfy New York’s changing grid reliability needs.• Nine areas of market design opportunities across three main
points of focus (discussed on the next slide) require immediate attention and are recommended for implementation in the next five years, through 2024.
NYISO’s Wholesale
Market Platform
Maintaining Grid
Reliability
Enabling Climate Policy
Lowering Costs
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 3434
Energy Markets for a Grid In Transition§ Integrating Carbon Pricing into the markets as the most efficient, immediate and effective
means to pursue the state’s public policy goals for clean energy production detailed in the CLCPA.
§ Energy and ancillary services design enhancements to promote system flexibility.
§ Improving the resource adequacy model to better align compensation with performance given the changing power grid.
§ Comprehensive Mitigation Review: the NYISO is actively engaging stakeholders to conduct a comprehensive review of NYISO market rules aimed at maintaining competitive market structures that will continue to support reliability, efficiency, and the transitioning grid.
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 35
NYISO Pandemic Preparedness
35
§ The NYISO has long had Pandemic Response and Business Continuity plans in place.
§ NYISO is engaged with New York asset owners on a daily basis§ Due to the unprecedented spread of the coronavirus, particularly in and
around New York State, NYISO senior leadership determined additional steps were needed to ensure the health and safety of NYISO employees and grid reliability. • A 37-person team of volunteers agreed to enter the sequestration program on March 23rd with
teams located at our two facilities.• Effective May 4th the sequestration program continued with a 19-person team of volunteers
located at a single site.• The broader NYISO employee base has been working productively from home.
©COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 36
NYISO Pandemic Observations
36
§ Demand remains lower than typically-expected levels across the New York Control Area (NYCA).
§ Notable trends during the fourth week of April include:• New York City hourly demand for the period of April 20 – April 24, ranged from 5% to about 20%
below typical levels.• For weekdays, reductions in electric consumption in New York City averaged 20% below expected
levels during the 8 a.m. hour.
§ NYCA-wide peaks averaged 7-8% below expected for the week.• NYCA-wide reductions in electric consumption compared to typical demand levels ranged from
about 3% during the 12 a.m. hour to just under 14% during the 7 a.m. hour.
§ The NYISO’s forecast team has observed that the reduction in electric demand from commercial customers is a leading driver of overall reduced electricity consumption. • We are also observing an increase in residential energy use, especially during the midday.
© COPYRIGHT NYISO 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Learn morewww.nyiso.com/carbon
Follow usNewYorkISO NYISO
37
Philip BruichSPP, Director of Market Administration
SPP RTO and West RC Footprints39
34.9%
27.5%
26.0%
6.0%5.2%
0.2% 0.1%
Coal (34.8%)
Wind (27.4%)
Natural Gas (25.9%)
Nuclear (6.0%)
Hydro (5.6%)
Solar (0.2%)
Other (0.1%)
2019 Energy Productionby Fuel Type: 271,330 GWh total
41.1%
26.0%
24.9%
3.7%
2.… 1.7% 0.2% 0.1%
Natural Gas (40.9%)Coal (25.9%)Wind (24.8%)Hydro (3.7%)Nuclear (2.3%)Fuel Oil (1.7%)Solar (0.2%)Other (0.1%)
GENERATING Capacity* by Fuel Type: 90,446 MW total
* nameplate capacity as of 1/10/20
• Maximum wind output: 18,259 MW (1/8/20)
• Minimum wind output (last 12 mos.):
374 MW (8/4/19 @ 10:31)
• Maximum wind penetration: 73.2% (4/27/20 01:24)
• Maximum renewable penetration: 78.2% (4/27/20 01:24)
• Average wind penetration (2019): 28.7%
• Max wind swing in one day: >16 GW on Dec. 11-12, 2019
(17.9 GW to 1.7 GW in 21 hours)
• Max 1-hour ramp: 3,700 MW
WIND PENETRATION IN THE SPP SYSTEM
On Dec. 11, 2019, 17.9 GW of wind power served 51% of our load. Less than 21 hours later, wind shrank to 6% of our generation mix, and other sources like coal and gas ramped up to serve load. This illustrates the value of a diverse fuel mix able to accommodate a wide variety of operational circumstances!
Dec. 11@ 20:10
Approx.21 hours laterWind
51%
Coal23%
Gas16%
Nuclear6%
Hydro4% Wind
6%
Coal46%
Gas35%
Nuclear7%
Hydro6%
Western Energy Services• SPP will administer the Western Energy Imbalance
Service(WEIS) market beginning February 1, 2021.
• Eight utilities have signed contracts as market participants.
• RTO membership is not required for participation in the market.
• SPP administered an EIS market from 2007 to 2014 prior to implementing the Integrated Marketplace.
COVID-19 Impacts
• ~4,000 Webex Meetings• 15% using External Webex
tools• 85% using Internal Webex tools
• Nearly 32,000 attendees!• Over 170 days!
46
Scheduled Generation outages (Jan-May)
Scheduled Generation outages (Jun-Dec)
Cancelled generation outages (Jan-Jun)
Historical load comparison to First full week of covid-19 shutdowns in spp footprint
Questions