Hopping dip analysis
-
Upload
kisanpatra -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Hopping dip analysis
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
1/33
Frequency Hopping
What is Frequency Hopping?
Frequency Hopping is an old technique introduced firstly in military
transmission system to ensure the secrecy of communications and
combat jamming. Frequency Hopping is mechanism in which the system
changes the frequency (uplink and downlink) during transmission at
regular intervals. It allows the RF channel used for signaling channel
(SDCCH) timeslot or traffic channel (TCH) timeslots, to change frequency
every TDMA frame (4.615 ms). The frequency is changed on a per burstbasis, which means that all the bits in a burst are transmitted in the same
frequency.
Advantages of Frequency Hopping
1. Frequency Diversity
In cellular urban environment, multi-path propagation exists in most
cases. Due to Rayleigh fading, short-term variations in received level are
frequently observed. This mainly affects stationary or quasi-stationary
mobiles. For a fast moving mobile, the fading situation can be avoided
from one burst to another because it also depends on the position of the
mobile so the problem is not so serious. Frequency Hopping is able to
take the advantage due to frequency selective nature of fading to
decrease the number of errors and at the same time they are temporallyspread. As a result, the decoding and de-interleaving processes can more
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
2/33
effectively remove bit errors caused by bursts received whilst on fading
frequencies (errors will be randomly distributed instead of having long
bursts of errors). This increase in effectiveness leads to a transmission
quality improvement of the same proportion.
Frame Erasure Rate reduces due to 6 dB to 8 dB gain.
Number of reports with rxqual 6 and 7 reduce.
Reported values of rxlev are more concentrated around mean.
2. Interference Averaging
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
3/33
Interference Averaging means spreading raw bit errors (BER caused by
the interference) in order to have random distribution of errors instead ofhaving burst of errors, and therefore, enhance the effectiveness of
decoding and de-interleaving process to cope with the BER and lead to
better value of FER.
With hopping, the set of interfering calls will be continually changing and
the effect is that all the calls experience average quality rather than
extreme situations of either good or bad quality. All the calls suffer fromcontrolled interference but only for short and distant periods of time, not
for all the duration of the call.
For the same capacity, Frequency Hopping improves quality and for a
given average quality Frequency Hopping makes possible increase in
capacity.
When more than 3 % of the reports have rxqual of 6 or 7 then voice
quality disturbances start to appear.
Gains (reduction in the C/I value needed to satisfy the quality
requirements involved in the criterion) from hopping relative to fixed
frequency operation can be achieved.
1/3 interference: 1 dB gain
i.e. if 1 out of 3 frequencies are experiencing a continuous interference a
gain of 1 dB in C/I requirement is obtained.
Similarly,
1/4 interference: 4 dB gain
1/5 interference: 6 dB gain
2/4 interference: 0 dB gain
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
4/33
2/5 interference: 4 dB gain
The effective gain obtained with Frequency Hopping is due to the fact that
the interference effect is minimized and it is easier to keep it under
control.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
5/33
Types of Frequency Hopping
There are two ways of implementing Frequency Hopping in a Base Station
System, one referred as Base Band Frequency Hopping (BBH) and
another as Synthesizer Frequency Hopping (SFH). Their operation differs
in the way they establish the Base to Mobile Station link (downlink),
however there is not difference at all between Mobile Station to Base
Station link in both types of hopping. Motorola does not allow BBH and
SFH to be used together on the same site
1. Base Band Frequency Hopping
This is accomplished by routing the traffic channel data through fixed
frequency DRCUs via the TDM highway on a timeslot basis. In this case,
the DRCU would have fixed tuned transmitters combined either in low loss
tuned combiners or hybrid combiners.
DRCU always transmits fixed frequency.
The information for every call is moved among the available DRCUs on
a per burst basis. (Burst of 577 s)
Call hops between same timeslots of all DRCUs.
Processing (coding and interleaving) is done by digital part associated
with DRCU on which call was initially assigned.
For uplink call is always processed by DRCU on which the call was
initially assigned.
Number of DRCUs needed is equal to the number of frequencies in the
hopping sequence.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
6/33
BCCH frequency can be included in the hopping sequence.
Power control does not apply to BCCH or bursts transmitting BCCH
frequency.
BCCH, timeslot 0 will never hop.
Any timeslot with CCCH will never hop.
Timeslot carrying all SDCCHs can hop.
If a network running with fixed frequency plan is switched over to BBH(BCCH included in MA list) without any frequency changes, significant
quality improvement can be observed in the network. As a result drop
call rate reduces in the network. Alternatively, for the existing network
quality additional capacity can be provided. FHI can be used effectively in
BBH. Further details regarding FHI planning are discussed later in the
document.
2. Synthesizer Frequency Hopping
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
7/33
This is accomplished by high speed switching of transmit and receive
frequency synthesizers of the individual DRCUs. As a result of dynamicnature of the transmit frequency, broadband (hybrid) combining of the
transmitters is necessary.
DRCU changes transmitting frequency every burst.
Call stays on the same DRCU where it started.
Remote tune combiners (RTC) are not allowed.
Number of DRCUs is not related to number of frequencies in hopping
sequence.
BCCH can be included in the hopping sequence:
If BCCH is included in the hopping sequence, timeslots 1 to 7 can not be
used to carry traffic. They transmit dummy burst when BCCH frequencyis not in the burst. Whenever BCCH frequency is being transmitted in a
burst by DRCU, it will be transmitted at full power.
BCCH DRCU will never hop. It either carries traffic in timeslots 1 to 7 or it
transmits dummy bursts.
Transmission and reception is done on the same timeslot and same
DRCU.
Motorola allows to have NBCCH on fixed frequency hopping on the
same sector.
Frequency Hopping Parameters
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
8/33
GSM defines the following set of parameters:
Mobile Allocation (MA):Set of frequencies the mobile is allowed to hop
over. Maximum of 63 frequencies can be defined in the MA list.
Hopping Sequence Number (HSN):Determines the hopping order
used in the cell. It is possible to assign 64 different HSNs. Setting HSN =
0 provides cyclic hopping sequence and HSN = 1 to 63 provide various
pseudo-random hopping sequences.
Mobile Allocation Index Offset (MAIO): Determines inside the
hopping sequence, which frequency the mobile starts do transmit on. The
valee of MAIO ranges between 0 to (N-1) where N is the number of
frequencies defined in the MA list. Presently MAIO is set on per carrier
basis.
Motorola has defined an additional parameter, FHI.
Frequency Hopping Indicator (FHI):Defines a hopping system, madeup by an associated set of frequencies (MA) to hop over and sequence of
hopping (HSN). The value of FHI varies between 0 to 3. It is possible to
define all 4 FHIs in a single cell.
Motorola system allows to define the hopping system on a per timeslot
basis. So different hopping configurations are allowed for different
timeslots. This is very useful for interference averaging and to randomizethe distribution of errors.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
9/33
GSM algorithm
GSM has defined an algorithm for deciding hopping sequence. The
algorithm is used to generate Mobile Allocation Index (MAI) for a given
set of parameters.
ARFCN: absolute radio frequency channel number
MA: mobile allocation frequencies.
MAIO: Mobile allocation offset (0 to N-1), where N is the number of
frequencies defined in MA.
HSN: Hopping sequence number (0-63)
T1: Super frame number (0-2047)
T2: TCH multiframe number (0-25)
T3: Signaling multiframe number (0-50)
This algorithm generates a pseudo-random sequence of MAIs. MAI along
with MAIO and MA will decide the actual ARFCN to be used for the burst.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
10/33
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
11/33
Planning for Frequency Hopping
1. Frequency Plan:
Frequency Hopping plan differs from the conventional fixed frequency
plan. The plan depends upon the type of Frequency Hopping system
used. In case of SFH including BCCH frequency in hopping sequence is
not a practical option, as it results in loss of traffic channels on BCCH
carrier. A separate frequency plan is prepared for the BCCH
carriers. This planning is very much similar to the conventional fixed
frequency plan with lesser number of frequencies. This plan needs to be
done very carefully as the system monitors cells based on the BCCH
frequency only. Since BCCH carrier radiates continuously without
downlink power control, frequencies used for BCCH on one cell should not
be used as hopping frequencies on other cell. The reason is to avoid
continuous interference from BCCH carriers. The benefits of hopping
increase if more frequencies are available for hopping. Generally the
frequency band is divided into two parts, one used for BCCH frequency
plan and other for hopping frequencies. The division of frequency band
for allocation of BCCH and hopping carriers should be done to maintain
reasonable C/I for BCCH carriers as well as to have enough frequencies
for hopping.
e.g.
consider a network with 31 frequencies, using 12 frequencies for BCCH
and using 18 for hopping with 1 frequency as guard, is the ideal
option. But it may not be practically possible to plan BCCHs with 12
frequencies (4/12 reuse). Using 15 for BCCH plan and 15 for hopping
frequencies is more practical. There always exists a trade-off between
BCCH and hopping plans. Using very less frequencies for BCCH plan
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
12/33
might result in poor quality on BCCH carrier and the advantages of having
quality improvement on hopping carriers may be lost. The ratio between
hopping and BCCH frequencies should be decided based on the ratio of
number of BCCH and NBCCH carriers in the network.
In case of BBH, generally BCCH carrier is included in the hopping
sequence. The benefits of BBH can be obtained only when most of the
sites in the network are having more than one NBCCH carriers. Benefits
of BBH comparable to SFH can only be obtained by equipping additional
hardware in order to include more frequencies in hopping
sequence. However BBH without additional hardware will result in quality
improvements and provide scope of additional capacity as compared tofixed frequency plan though the benefits may not be as significant as seen
in SFH.
2. Planning of HSN:
HSN allocation to the cells is done in random fashion. Various scenarios
are explained below:
a. MA list is same for all the cells of the site In this case HSN is kept
same for all the cells of the site. MAIO is used on per carrier basis to
provide offset for starting frequency in hopping sequence and avoid hitsamong carriers of the site. Practically it is possible to achieve 0% hit rate
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
13/33
within the site, as all the cells of the same site are synchronized.
b. MA list is same for the cells of different sites In this case HSN should
be different for all such cells. MAIO can be same or different in this case
as HSN is different.
c. MA list is different for the cells In this case HSN planning is not
important, as there can not be any hits between these cells.
d. HSN is set to 0 This is the case of cyclic hopping. The sequence for
hopping remains same and is repeated continuously. This is not
recommended in the urban environment where frequency reuse is more.
This is because the network is not synchronized so if there is any one hit
it will result in continuous sequence of hits. Cyclic hopping is preferred inrural environment as it provides the maximum benefits of frequency
diversity.
3. Planning of MAIO:
The benefits of MAIO planning can be best achieved only in case when
sectors having same MA list are synchronized. For non-synchronized
sectors MAIO can be the same. In the previous version (GSR2), Motorola
did not provide manual MAIO setting. It was set automatically by the
system. However from GSR3 onwards it is be possible to set MAIO
manually. It has to be changed on a case to case basis. In cases where
there are large numbers of hits, MAIO change can be effective as it addsthe offset in the hopping sequence and hit-rate can be reduced.
4. Planning of FHI:
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
14/33
This parameter is not specified in GSM. FHI is the Motorola defined
hopping system. It actually means an independent hopping system
consisting of MA and HSN. Total of 4 such hopping systems can be set in
a cell.
FHI can be defined on a timeslot basis.
e.g. consider a cell with 3 carriers i.e. 2 carriers are hopping. It is then
possible to define 4 different FHIs for 16 timeslots. That means timeslot
0 to 3 of 1 carrier can have one FHI and so on.
Benefits and Drawbacks of FHI
Separate FHI can be defined even for each carrier with separate MA
list.
For a fully utilized cell, FHI can be used to control increase in hitrate
during peak hours. This can be done by defining different MA list
associated with a FHI for one of the carriers.
Main benefits of FHI can be obtained in BBH. Consider a cell with 2
carriers using BBH with BCCH included in the hopping sequence. Timeslot0 of BCCH will not hop. A separate FHI (with MA list without BCCH
frequency) has to be defined for timeslot 0 of NBCCH.
Different FHIs in the same cell is not used extensively in Motorola
networks with SFH, where BCCH frequency is not included in hopping
sequence.
One drawback of using FHI on timeslot basis is that it adds more
complexity to the database.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
15/33
5. Reuse pattern for hopping carriers:
Conventionally there are 3 main reuse patterns followed for hopping
frequencies.
1 X 1:It means all the cells in the network use the same frequencies forhopping.
e.g. If 15 frequencies are to be used for hopping, then every cell will have
all 15 frequencies in the MA list. This type of reuse is useful in urban
areas, where capacity requirement is large. However there is very less
planning involved and so less control over quality problems.
3 X 9:Three hopping groups are used in 3 sites, one per site. In this
case all the sites should be considered as omni sites for planning
frequency reuse. The advantage of this scheme is it provides better
isolation between sites using same hopping frequencies. The problem
with this method is that, addition of new site may require frequency
replan for the area.
1 X 3:This scheme is very commonly used in Motorola
networks. Hopping frequencies are divided in 3 groups. Each cell on a
site uses one group and it is repeated on all sites. e.g. consider a
network with standard orientation, all V1 sectors will use the same group
and so on. It is very easy to add a site in the network. This reuse
scheme is suitable for homogeneous network with minimum overlapping
areas. The problem with this scheme is in peak hours there may be more
hits.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
16/33
Loading Factor: This parameter is a deciding factor for number of
carriers that can be equipped on a sector or a site. Number of carriers
equipped on a site or sector should not be greater than 50% of the
number of frequencies in the MA list of the sector or site. This factor is amajor distinguishing factor between 1 x 1 and 1 x 3.
6. Tools for simulation and drive test:Motorola uses a tool
Handsem which can simulate SFH plan (different reuse patterns and
HSN plan). Latest versions of plaNET and Golf are supposed to supportFrequency Hopping simulation. Drive test tools that display decoded layer
3 information are used for monitoring frequency hopping networks. TEMS
is one of the drive test tools that can be used for the purpose.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
17/33
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
18/33
Effect of Frequency Hopping
1. Handovers: When SFH is implemented, BCCH plan is done usinglesser number of frequencies as compared to fixed frequency plan. This
may result in quality degradation. However quality of hopping carriers
improves than before. Also, quality threshold for handovers on hopping
carrier should be increased as compared to fixed frequency plan. In the
present version (GSR3), different quality threshold settings are set BCCH
and NBCCH. By setting lower quality thresholds for BCCH as compared to
NBCCH, number of dropped calls can be controlled. Handover Success
Rate may go down because of the BCCH replan (less frequencies). This
reduction may get compensated due to improvement in quality of hoppingcarriers (improvement in TCH assignment success rate).
2. Call setup:In call setup, SDCCH hopping is also possible. There are
no separate settings required for SDCCH hopping. Since GSR3 allows
control over SDCCH configuration (location of SDCCH on timeslot basis),
SDCCH hopping depends on the location of SDCCH. In case of SFH (with
BCCH not included in MA list), if SDCCHs are on BCCH carrier they will nothop whereas SDCCHs on NBCCH carriers may hop. Generally it is
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
19/33
preferred to keep SDCCHs on BCCH carrier as SDCCH timeslot is used
continuously and it will increase interference on hopping carriers. Call
success rate will depend on the cleanliness of BCCH carriers. Call Success
Rate may reduce after BCCH replan. This reduction may fet compensated
due to improvement in quality of hopping carriers (improvement in TCHassignment success rate).
3. Frame Erasure Rate (FER):FER indicates the number of TDMA
frames that could not be decoded by the mobile due to interference. This
parameter gives the indication of hit-rate. FER improves (gain of 6 to 8
dB) after implementation of frequency hopping. FER is represented in
percentage terms. FER less than 10% is considered to be good. But thisis a subjective issue and good value should be decided by doing multiple
drives. In future Motorola is planning to include FER as a statistics in the
OMCR.
Implementation of Synthesiser Frequency Hopping (Mumbai
Network):
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
20/33
1. Frequency Planning:
Channels available: 32 to 62
Frequency band is divided in 2 parts. First 15 channels from 32 to 46 is
to be used as hopping frequencies.
Reasons for such division are:
It is recommended to use lower band for BCCH as it has better
penetration and also it is useful in roaming for logging on to the network.
Hutchison-Max is using channel 31 in hopping in entire network.
BPL Mobile is not allowed to use 32 as BCCH in South and Central
Mumbai (South of Bandra and Sion).
So there is no option to use 32 in hopping otherwise it will be
underutilised.
BCCH plan:
Channel 48 to 62 is used as BCCH. Channel 47, which is guard
channel (between hopping and non-hopping) is used selectively, in an
area where 46 is not in hopping sequence. Possible use of channel 47 in
hopping can also be considered on a case to case basis. (where 4 or 5carriers are required). But then interference from BCCH 48 must be
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
21/33
considered.
4 x 3 frequency reuse plan is used which theoretically needs 12frequencies. However it is not possible to plan Mumbai network in 12
considering the terrain. So remaining 4 frequencies will be used
selectively. Also there is a plan to reserve these for micro cells. BCCH
plan has been made considering quality as a major criteria. E.g. sector
looking towards Altamount Road has lesser re-used frequency.
NBCCH plan:
1 x 1 plan: all 15 or 16 frequencies in all the cells. As per loading
factor definition there can be 7 NBCCH carriers equipped on a site. This
gives some flexibility to RF Planner to have irregular configuration on each
site. E.g. 3-3-4 or 3-4-3 or 4-3-3 or even 2-5-3 or 2-2-6 configuration
can be used on the site. It is even possible to use 8 NBCCH carriers on a
site but it will result in increase in interference in surroundingsites. However this can be used on a case to case basis. It was decided
to go for 1 x 1 after 1 x 3 implementation.
1 x 3 plan: the band is divided into 3 parts
Set 1 (S1) 32, 35, 38, 41, 44
Set 2 (S2) 33, 36, 39, 42, 45 Set 3 (S3) 34,
37, 40, 43, 46
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
22/33
These sets are used on a sectorwise basis. Set 1 is used preferably in
sector V1 and so on. The use of these sets is related to the orientation of
the sectors, so that same set is not used on sectors looking at each other.
Since there are 5 frequencies in each sector, as per definition of loading
factor, there can be only 2 NBCCH carriers equipped on each sector. 3-3-
3 is the only configuration allowed in this plan. If configuration like 3-4-3
is required then 4 NBCCH should be in fixed frequency mode. Use of 4th
NBCCH is hopping carrier results in more hits on surrounding sectors that
are using same MA list set. However this can be used on a case to case
basis.
Other issues:
1. Previously in Area A in 129 cells (48 sites) BCCH frequency reuse was
maximum of 9 times (average use 4.4 times). In the new BCCH plan (forSFH) frequency reuse is maximum of 12 times (average use 8.6
times). The main reason for this is we used entire band of 30 channels
for BCCH earlier. However the new BCCH plan is made just from the 15
frequencies.
2. This increase in reuse is definitely going to degrade BCCH carrier
quality as compared to present situation.
3. BCCH carrier is very important for logging on to the network orstaying in the network. Even in the present plan we have observed
problems of logging on to the network (Express towers top floor). This
problem might elevate after new plan.
4. Present version of BSS software assigns SDCCHs on BCCH carrier
only. Since BCCH quality is going to degrade, option of SD location will
have to be purchased.
5. Hopping carriers will have much better call quality than presentfrequency plan. There is a possibility that the quality difference in quality
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
23/33
on BCCH and NBBCH may be significant. TCH priority (priority to allocate
TCH) option may also be needed.
6. It is presumed that addition of the site is very easy in SFH. It is very
true for NBCCH carriers. But the BCCH plan for new sites is more difficult.
Planned events for implementation:
1. Reduction of overlaps of the existing coverage of all sectors by
antenna optimisation.
2. Preparation of BCCH Plan Area wise and drive test data collection
and analysis
3. Simulation of BCCH plan using NBCCH at full power feature.
4. Implementation of BCCH plan with NBCCH in fixed frequency mode.
5. Optimisation of BCCH plan.
6. Implementation of hopping plan on trial basis in Vashi BSC
7. Optimisation of Vashi BSC in 1 x 3 Hopping plan
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
24/33
8. Testing of features in Vashi BSC
9. BCCH Plan for the entire network and monitor for 1 week
10. Optimisation of the BCCH Plan
11. Implementtaion of 1 x 3 hopping plan in the network
12. Drive test areawise collection of drive data and anlaysis.
13. GOS monitoring and analysis.
14. Optimisation of 1 x 3 Plan
15. Enable down link DTX and monitor
16. Plan for 1 x 1 plan.
17. 1 x 1 plan in the network
18. Optimise the 1 x 1 plan
Summary of Tests conducted:
a. CellAd Drive test (subjective voice quality - Mean Opinion Score)
b. Monitoring Customer Complaints
c. Addition/Deletion of carrier
d. Addition of Site
e. Parameter Changes MAIO/HSN
f. To try & use Guard Band
g. Install a Repeater
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
25/33
h. Change in MA List ( No. of Frequencies)
i. Cell Broadcast Facility
j. SDCCH Hopping
k. Enable Uplink DTX
l. Enable combined and non-combined multiframe.
m. Enable Downlink DTx
n. Combination of DTx and multiframes.
o. RCU failures after switchover to hopping.
p. NBCCH full power in hopping environment
q. Extended paging.
r. Various combinations of extended paging, DTx and combined/non-
combined multiframe should be tried out.
Activities in SFH Implementation:
1. The parameters and statistics be monitored at OMCR
RF Loss rate
TCH RF Loss Rate
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
26/33
SDCCH RF Loss Rate
Handover Failure Rate
Handover Success Rate
TCH Assignment Success Rate
Call Success Rate
Drop Call rate
Drop Call Rate per Erlang
Interference on Idle
Out_ho_cause_atmpt
2. Drive Test
Drive test should be done using Tems and CellAD or Buzzard
(subjective voice quality measurement).
Enough samples of drive tests should be taken before after each
change made to the network (or part of the network)
FICS report should be generated to check the drive test results.
GIMS/Mapinfo should be used to plot the drive test and to identify new
problem areas. Drive test plots should provide RXQual, RxLev,
Handovers, Handover Channel and Drop Calls. This is very useful to
identify the change in any of the areas and the cause. Separate FER plot
should be taken to identify the change.
3. Frequency Planning
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
27/33
BCCH Plan is very critical for success of SFH
implementation. Motorola provides a feature called NBCCH fullPower. This ensures that NBCCH carrier radiates at full power even if
there is no call on it. This feature can be used to check the planned BCCH
reuse without affecting any of the BCCH carriers. Validation of BCCH plan
can be done using this feature.
Before Final implementation of hopping is should be implemented in
one BSC. Separate BCCH plan is required to be made for that period.
NBCCH Plan also should be kept ready. Initially Loading Factorconstraint (
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
28/33
g. Change in MA List No Improvements
h. Locking of Boundary site neighbours No Improvements
i. Integration of Koperkhirane Difficulty in BCCH plan &
Ease in NBCCH Plan. Degradation in neighour sites observed
j. Downlink DTx No problems found.
k. Downlink DTx and extended paging Siemens S3+ does not do location
update.
l. Extended Paging No problems found
5. Summary of problems observed after 1 x 3 implementation:
Drive Tests:
Observations: From the drive results following are the areas that had shown Voice Quality
problems.
Area AAlta Mount Road, Walkeshwar, Chowpatty
Area BE.Moses Road, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mahim-Sion Link Rd.
Area CBand Stand, Carter Road, SV Road near Mithibai College, Western Express
Highway near Domestic Airport, Powai
Area D
LBS Road Near Kurla, Eastern Express Highway near Chembur.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
29/33
Area EMarve Road, Vasai, Essel World
In the above areas Rx Voice Quality was in levels of 6 & 7. However the call did not drop.
TEMS Drive was repeated to check consistency of the results. In some areas consistency
could not be established. The results are dependent on the traffic (loading) carried during the
drive and also on the quality of BCCH or the hopping carriers.
GOS Statistics:
Observation:In general, it was observed that in all the BSCs the HSR, CSR, DCR have
degraded marginally except in Powai BSC and Thane BSC, where, there was considerable
degradation in HSR.
Following sectors were found to be degraded:
CSR Degradation : HSR Degradation :
1. Flora Fountain V3 1. Cuffe Parade
2. Eros V2 2. Bandra Kurla V3
3. Santacruz V1 3.Mahim Station V1
4. Mahim Station V3 4.Vashi Sect-17 V3
5. Crawford Market V1 5.Belapur V3
6. Juhu Galli V2 6. Kalamboli V1,V3
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
30/33
7. D Road V1 7. Girgaum V3
8. Kings Circle V3 8. Sewree V3
9. Mira Road V3 9.Sahar V1
10.MIDC V1
11.Powai Hirmdani V1
12.Mumbra V1
13.Kalyan V1
14.Ghodbunder Road V2
15.Charkop V1
Of all the BSCs it was observed that Powai BSC has degraded considerably in HSR, CSR and
DCR. Six sectors have HSR less than 90% in this BSC.
There are two ways of implementing Frequency Hopping in a Base Station
System, one referred as Base Band Frequency Hopping (BBH) and another as
Synthesizer Frequency Hopping (SFH). Their operation differs in the way they
establish the Base to Mobile Station link (downlink), however there is not
difference at all between Mobile Station to Base Station link in both types of
hopping. Motorola does not allow BBH and SFH to be used together on the same
site
1. Base Band Frequency Hopping
This is accomplished by routing the traffic channel data through fixed frequency
DRCUs via the TDM highway on a timeslot basis. In this case, the DRCU would
have fixed tuned transmitters combined either in low loss tuned combiners or
hybrid combiners.
DRCU always transmits fixed frequency.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
31/33
The information for every call is moved among the available DRCUs on a per
burst basis. (Burst of 577 s)
Call hops between same timeslots of all DRCUs.
Processing (coding and interleaving) is done by digital part associated with
DRCU on which call was initially assigned.
For uplink call is always processed by DRCU on which the call was initially
assigned.
Number of DRCUs needed is equal to the number of frequencies in the
hopping sequence.
BCCH frequency can be included in the hopping sequence.
Power control does not apply to BCCH or bursts transmitting BCCH
frequency.
BCCH, timeslot 0 will never hop.
Any timeslot with CCCH will never hop.
Timeslot carrying all SDCCHs can hop.
If a network running with fixed frequency plan is switched over to BBH (BCCH
included in MA list) without any frequency changes, significant quality
improvement can be observed in the network. As a result drop call rate reduces
in the network. Alternatively, for the existing network quality additional capacity
can be provided. FHI can be used effectively in BBH. Further details regarding
FHI planning are discussed later in the document.
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
32/33
2. Synthesizer Frequency Hopping
This is accomplished by high speed switching of transmit and receive frequency
synthesizers of the individual DRCUs. As a result of dynamic nature of the
transmit frequency, broadband (hybrid) combining of the transmitters is
necessary.
DRCU changes transmitting frequency every burst.
Call stays on the same DRCU where it started.
Remote tune combiners (RTC) are not allowed.
Number of DRCUs is not related to number of frequencies in hopping
sequence.
BCCH can be included in the hopping sequence:
If BCCH is included in the hopping sequence, timeslots 1 to 7 can not be used to
carry traffic. They transmit dummy burst when BCCH frequency is not in the
burst. Whenever BCCH frequency is being transmitted in a burst by DRCU, it will
be transmitted at full power.
BCCH DRCU will never hop. It either carries traffic in timeslots 1 to 7 or it
transmits dummy bursts.
Transmission and reception is done on the same timeslot and same DRCU.
Motorola allows to have NBCCH on fixed frequency hopping on the same
sector.
Frequency Hopping Parameters
-
8/11/2019 Hopping dip analysis
33/33
GSM defines the following set of parameters:
Mobile Allocation (MA):Set of frequencies the mobile is allowed to hop
over. Maximum of 63 frequencies can be defined in the MA list.
Hopping Sequence Number (HSN):Determines the hopping order used in the
cell. It is possible to assign 64 different HSNs. Setting HSN = 0 provides cyclic
hopping sequence and HSN = 1 to 63 provide various pseudo-random hopping
sequences.
Mobile Allocation Index Offset (MAIO): Determines inside the hopping
sequence, which frequency the mobile starts do transmit on. The valee of MAIO
ranges between 0 to (N-1) where N is the number of frequencies defined in the
MA list. Presently MAIO is set on per carrier basis.
Motorola has defined an additional parameter, FHI.
Frequency Hopping Indicator (FHI):Defines a hopping system, made up by
an associated set of frequencies (MA) to hop over and sequence of hopping
(HSN). The value of FHI varies between 0 to 3. It is possible to define all 4
FHIs in a single cell.
Motorola system allows to define the hopping system on a per timeslot basis. So
different hopping configurations are allowed for different timeslots. This is very
useful for interference averaging and to randomize the distribution of errors.