Hong Su, Ph.D. Summitech Engineering, Inc. Virtual ... · Virtual Automotive Product Development...
Transcript of Hong Su, Ph.D. Summitech Engineering, Inc. Virtual ... · Virtual Automotive Product Development...
Hong Su, Ph.D. Summitech Engineering, Inc. Virtual Automotive Product Development Using Frequency Domain Simulation Techniques
Technical BackgroundTime vs. frequency domainFrequency characteristics Frequency response analysis
Durability virtual testsDynamic loadsStructural durability evaluation
NVH virtual testsVibration response performanceAcoustic and noise performance
Conclusions
Virtual Automotive Product Development Using Frequency Domain Simulation Techniques
Data in Time and Frequency Domains
Frequency domain PSD data
Time domain data Same Vehicle load Data
But in different domainsRelated by FFT techniqueAs Fourier transform pairs
( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )dttxtxT
limtxtxERT
Tτττ +=+= ∫∞→ 0
1
( ) ( ) ττω ωτ deRS i−∞
∞−∫=
( ) ( ) ωωπ
τ ωτ deSR i∫∞
∞−=
21
Example: PG Belgium Block Road
Frequency Domain Characteristics
Data in frequency domain– Load, stress and strain, SPL, PSD, …– Amplitude & phase; real & imaginary– Correlation (auto and cross), octave – White or color noise, narrow band, …
Product frequency properties– Natural frequency and resonance – Modal shape and strain energy density– Damping & stiffness, transfer function, …
Product NVH and durability are related to its frequency characteristics;Design specification & validation is often specified in the frequency domain.
Product Performance SimulationsTime domain simulation
0A system of nonlinear differential equations0Solve for response {x(t)} in time steps
Frequency domain simulation
0A system of localized linear algebra equations0Solve for response {X(w)} in frequency points
[ ] ( ){ } ( )[ ] ( ){ } ( )[ ] ( ){ } ( ){ }tptxTxxKtxTxxCtxM =++ ,,,, &&&&&
( ){ } ( )[ ] ( ){ }ωωω PHX ⋅=
( )[ ] [ ] ( )[ ] ( )[ ]( ) 12 ,,,,,, −++−= jleqjleq PTXKPTXCiMH ωωωωω
2G 4G 8G
Cold Case (-40C)
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w 2̂)}, 2g_cold
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w 2̂)}, 4g_cold
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w^2)}, 8g_cold
Ambient (23C)
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w 2̂)}, 2g_room
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w 2̂)}, 4g_room
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w^2)}, 8g_room
Hot Case (120C)
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w 2̂)}, 2g_hot
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w 2̂)}, 4g_hot
{i[C]w+([K]-[M]w^2)}, 8g_hot
Vibration Load LevelTemperature Case
Example: Localized Nonlinear FE Model (An Array of Local Models of An EIS)
( )[ ] [ ] ( )[ ] ( )[ ]( ) 12 ,,,,,, −++−= jleqjleq PTXKPTXCiMH ωωωωω
A system of localized linear equations in the frequency domain
Test conditions (I):
• Load level = 2g
• Temperatures:• Cold = -40ºC• Ambient = 23ºC• Hot = 120ºC
AIS Result Correlation, 2gzup1co
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
AIS Result Correlation, 2gzup1am
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
AIS Result Correlation, 2gzup1ht
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
Example: Localized Nonlinear FE Model EIS Assembly (Result Correlation I)
Test conditions (II):
• Load level = 4g
• Temperatures:• Cold = -40ºC• Ambient = 23ºC• Hot = 120ºC
AIS Result Correlation, 4gzup1co
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
AIS Result Correlation, 4gzup1am
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
AIS Result Corre la tion, 4gzup1ht
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
10 100 1000
Fre quency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
Example: Localized Nonlinear FE Model EIS Assembly (Result Correlation II)
Test conditions (III):
h
Load level = 8g
h
Temperatures:h Cold = -40ºCh Ambient = 23ºCh Hot = 120ºC
AIS Result Correlation, 8gzup1co
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
AIS Result Correlation, 8gzup1am
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
16.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
AIS Result Correlation, 8gzup1ht
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
12.0
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Test
CAE
Example: Localized Nonlinear FE Model EIS Assembly (Result Correlation III)
A Flow Chart of CAE Virtual Tests (Frequency Domain)
KLT load level cases and temperature cases
Generate vibration load tables (Nastran)
Localized FE model H(K,C,ω), for case l,j
Generate SED matrix, hotspots
and FEM bulk data
Run frequency response simulation
(SOL111)
Yes: Process and sort element stress results
Evaluate structural fatigue damage
Engine load, environment and
duty cycles
CAD data: geometry and
BOM
Material S/N data
Set damage model and parameters
Output: Estimated
durability life
CAE material property database
Is the error acceptable?
No: Update model control
parameters
Fatigue Damage Evaluation - Miner’s Rule
Time domain
– Inputs: stress time history s(t), material S-N data
– Rainflow cycle counting algorithm
Frequency domain
– Inputs: stress PSD profile Ss (w), material S-N data
– Close form PDF p(SA ) and E[AD] solutions
[ ]( )( )
( )( )E AD
n SN S
pS NNS
dSi A
i Ai
A
AA= =∑ ∫
∞
03( )
[ ] ( ) [ ] ( )E AD mT E p
Bm
W
m= +
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟λ α σ, 2
21Γ
Technical BackgroundTime vs. frequency domainFrequency characteristics Frequency response analysis
Durability virtual testsDynamic loadsStructural durability evaluation
NVH virtual testsVibration response performanceAcoustic and noise performance
Conclusions
Virtual Automotive Product Development Using Frequency Domain Simulation Techniques
Engine Loads and Definition
2. Engine duty cycle definition
No.Duration Portion
1 Idle to 25% of redline 28.90%2 25% to 50% of redline 63.70%3 50% to 75% of redline 6.90%4 75% of redline to redline 0.40%
RPM Load Range
Me asured Engine Vib Data (Z , M ount1)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Engine spe ed (RPM)
Acc
e (m
/s^2
)
OA
2nd
4th
6th
8th
An I4 2.3L Engine
1. Measured enginevibration loads in harmonic contents
Vibration Test Load Specification (Engine-mount Product, Random PSD format)
Test load specification based on1. Measured engine data 2. Duty cycle definition 3. Frequency analysis, and 4. Equivalent damage techniques
Random Vibration Load (Engine Mount)
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.0E+00
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e PS
D (g
^2/H
z)
Frequency PSD(Hz) (g^2/Hz)
20 2.00E-0565 2.00E-01200 2.00E-01285 1.50E-031000 1.50E-03
RMS (g) = 5.7Test Duration = 100 hours
Ref: "Vibration Test Specification for Automotive Products," SAE Paper 2006-01-0729, by H. Su
Vibration Test Load Specification (Engine-mount Product, Swept Sine format)
Test load specification based on1. Measured engine data 2. Duty cycle definition 3. Frequency analysis, and 4. Equivalent damage techniques
Frequency Acceleration(Hz) (G)
20 1.165 9.56
200 9.56285 1.321000 1.32
Type of sweep = LogTime per sweep (min) = 20
Sweep speed (Oct/min) = 0.565Number of sweeps = 300
Test Duration (hours) = 100
Sine Vibration Load (Engine Mount, Z)
0
2
4
6
8
10
10 100 1000Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Left Mount
Rear Mount
Right Mount
Front Mount
FE Model of An Engine Suspension System
EM01 Rear-Bushing Dynamic Stiffness
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Frequency (Hz)St
iffne
ss (N
/mm
)
R-Direction
P-Direction
Q-Direction
EM01 Rear-Bushing Dynamic Damping
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Dam
ping
(N.s
/mm
)
R-Direction
P-Direction
Q-Direction
Nonlinear Rubber Bushing Damping Frequency Properties
Nonlinear Rubber Bushing Stiffness Frequency Properties
Suspended Engine and
TransmissionNonlinear rubber bushing properties are modeled by MSC.Nastran CBUSH elements and PBUSH tables
Durability Virtual Test of Engine Suspension
Sine Vibration Load (Engine Mount, Z)
0
2
4
6
8
10
10 100 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Acc
e (g
)
Bracket Stress Response
Engine Vibration Load Input
Right Mount Structure
Bracket Stress Distribution
Swept Sine Stress Response (E3017)
0
50
100
150
200
250
1 10 100 1000Frequency (Hz)
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
Durability Virtual Test in Swept SineBracket Stress Response
Material Fatigue S-N Curve
Estimated Durability Life From: 1. Sine stress response 2. Material fatigue S-N data
E[DL] = 3.6 times of design life
Fatigue/Setting Input File: sine_SAE950X_2l_inputs.txt
Stress Range Intercept, SRI1 = 0.113000E+05 MPaFirst Slope of S-N Curve, b1 = -0.306940Transition Life, NC1 = 0.100000E+05Second Slope of S-N data, b2 = -0.100343
Limits of Frequency Range = 20.00 to 300.00 HzTotal Test Duration, TT = 100.00 HoursTime for Two-way Sweep, T2 = 14.34 MinutesConfidence Scale Factor, CF = 1.20
Fatigue Results of Sine Response Data
Damage per Sine Sweep = 0.65536E-03Damage due to Total Test = 0.27394E+00Failure Time per Data = 0.36468E+03 HoursSweep Number at Failure = 0.15259E+04Durability Evaluation
Due to Swept Sine Load
Swept Sine Stress Damage AnalysisSwept Sine Stress Response (E3017)
0
50
100
150
200
250
1 10 100 1000Frequency (Hz)
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
Durability Virtual Test in Random PSD
Load: Power Hop HillPart: LR UCA BracketMaterial: SAE950XElement: 53691RMS = 55.08 MPaIrF, a = 0.412
Bracket stress response in PSDElement 53691 (Bracket, LR UCA (-Y))
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00Frequency (Hz)
Stre
ss P
SD (M
Pa^2
/Hz)
Estimated Durability Life From: 1. Stress response PSD 2. Material fatigue S-N data
E[DL] = 2.3 times of design life
Random PSD stress durabilityBracket stress distribution
Durability EvaluationIn random PSD
Ref: "Automotive CAE Durability Analysis Using Random Vibration Approach," MSC Paper 2000-64, by H. Su
Technical BackgroundTime vs. frequency domainFrequency characteristics Frequency response analysis
Durability virtual testsDynamic loadsStructural durability evaluation
NVH virtual testsVibration response performanceAcoustic and noise performance
Conclusions
Virtual Automotive Product Development Using Frequency Domain Simulation Techniques
Left Mount
Rear Mount
Right Mount
Engine Point Mobility
NVH Evaluation of Engine Suspension
NVH PM of EM01 Engine Suspension System (Z)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency (Hz)
Poin
t Mob
ility
(m
m/s
.N)
NVH Tr of Engine Suspension System (Z)
0
1
2
3
4
0 10 20 30 40 50Frequency (Hz)
Tran
smis
sibi
lity
(|Ao/
Ai|)
EM01 Right-Bushing Dynamic Damping
0.00
0.30
0.60
0.90
1.20
1.50
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Frequency ( Hz)
R-Direction
P-Direction
Q-Direction
Front Mount
Engine Vibration Transmissibility
High damping at Right Mount
Coupled Structure-Acoustic Analysis (An Engine Induction System, FEM/BEM)
Engine Acoustic Source (Piston/TB,
WN, v=1mm/s)
Inlet Orifice Opening 2
Inlet Orifice Opening 1
Helmholtz Resonator 1
Helmholtz Resonator 2
Helmholtz Resonator 3
Helmholtz Resonator 4
Quarter Wave Tuner 5
Cover of Air Cleaner Box
Tray of Air Cleaner Box
CAE Tools:
MSC.Nastran (FEM)LMS.SysNoise (BEM)
Structure and Acoustic Cavity Modes (An Engine Induction System, Cont’d)
Engein-Values of an AIS Assembly
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Frequency (Hz)
Structure Modes
Fluid Cavity Modes
Point Mobility at AIS Tray -X Panel
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800Frequency (Hz)
Mob
ility
(m/s
/N)
Structure mode at 736 Hz
Acoustic cavity mode at 430 Hz
Sound Pressure Level at Inlet Orifices (An Engine Induction System, Cont’d)
U387 AIS Inlet Noise SPL (Piston/TB)
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Frequency (Hz)
SPL
(dB
)U387 AIS Inlet Noise SPL (Inlet_1)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Frequency (Hz)
SPL
(dB
)
SPL 100 mm from Inlet 1Inlet Noise Distribution (760Hz)
U387 AIS Inlet Noise SPL (Inlet_2)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Frequency (Hz)
SPL
(dB
)
SPL 100 mm from Inlet 2
SPL at Piston/TB
Shell Radiated Noise Prediction (An Engine Induction System, Cont’d)
Noise Level at AIS Tray -X Panel (N4940)
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 200 400 600 800 1000Frequency (Hz)
SPL
(dB
)
Radiated and Inlet Noise Level Comparison (0.1m Away)
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 200 400 600 800 1000Frequency (Hz)
SPL
(dB
)
Inlet_1 Noise Inlet_2 Noise Radiated,Tray -X Panel
Structural vibration velocity distribution (730Hz)
Shell noise SPL distribution (R=0.7m, 730Hz)
ConclusionsPractical simulation techniques for virtual automotive product development in frequency domain are presented. Examples of auto products virtual tests are provided to demonstrate applications, such as
Test load specification (random PSD or swept sine format)Nonlinear system frequency response analysis Durability evaluation in PSD or sine stressVibration response and isolation performanceAcoustic performance evaluation (air or structure borne)
Presentation reveals the benefits from virtual product development:
Faster, lower cost and better products