Home and Abroad...holiday period • Impact on foreign and minority shareholders – not covered by...
Transcript of Home and Abroad...holiday period • Impact on foreign and minority shareholders – not covered by...
15th AnnualConferenceMaximise
Home and Abroad:How changes in national and internationalpolicy may affect your business
www.pwc.com/th
MaximiseShareholder Valuethrough EffectiveTAX Planning 2014 29-30 October 2013
Contents
Section one – Developments at home
Section two – Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)Section two – Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
PwC Slide 229-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Section one – Developments at home
1.1 Dividends from BOI business
1.2 Cross-shareholding
1.3 Return of capital
1.4 Taxation of liquidation proceeds
1.5 Royalties
PwC29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Slide 3
1.6 Double Taxation Agreements
Dividends from BOI business
PwC Slide 429-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
• Dividends paid from accountingprofits
“BOI dividend” for WHT exemption
A(TH)
B(TH)
C(US)
profits
• Dividends exempted from incometax and withholding tax if conditionsunder Section 65 bis (10) are met
• Dividends from BOI profitsexempted from income tax andwithholding tax if paid during tax
(TH) (TH) (US)
BOI
10% 40% 50%
PwC
holiday period
• Impact on foreign andminority shareholders – notcovered by Section 65 bis (10)
Slide 529-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
• No definition of “profit” under theThai Revenue Code or Civil andCommercial Code (“CCC”)
Definition of “Profit”
Case 1:Non-BOI BOI Total
Commercial Code (“CCC”)
• CCC merely states that a“dividend” may only be paid out of“profit”.
• Temporary and permanentdifferences result in accountingand tax profits being different.
A/C profits 80 20 100
Permanentdifferences
8 15 23
Doublededuction(BOI)
- (10) (10)
Tax profits 88 25 113
PwC
and tax profits being different.
• RD: BOI dividend has to be paidout of tax profits.
Slide 629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Dividend 75 25 100
• Taking double deduction reducesBOI tax profits and BOI dividend.
Taking BOI double deduction
Case 2:Non-BOI BOI Total
• More non-BOI profits must bedistributed.
• WHT cost increases.
A/C profits 80 20 100
Permanentdifferences
8 5 13
Doublededuction(BOI)
- (10) (10)
Tax profits 88 15 103
PwC Slide 729-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Dividend 85 15 100
WHT 8.5 0 8.5
• Foregoing double deductionincreases tax profits and more BOIdividend can be paid out free from
Do not Take BOI double deduction
Case 3:Non-BOI BOI Total
dividend can be paid out free fromWHT.
• No tax cost of foregoing thededuction if business is profitable.
• Counter intuitive tax planning
A/C profits 80 20 100
Permanentdifferences
8 5 13
Doublededuction(BOI)
- - -
Tax profits 88 25 113
PwC Slide 829-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Dividend 75 25 100
WHT 7.5 0 7.5
Cross-shareholding
PwC Slide 929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Conditions for dividend exemption
• Not less than 25% shareholdingwith voting rights;Co. A with voting rights;
• No cross shareholding eitherdirectly or indirectly; and
• Shares held for at least 3 monthsbefore and after the date ofreceiving dividends
Co. A
Co. B
50%
99.97%
PwC Slide 1029-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Cross-shareholding
Co. A(Payer)
Co. A(Payer)
Co. A(Payer)(Payer)
100%50% Co. C
(Payer)
50%
100%
(Payer)
100%Dividend
PwC Slide 1129-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Co. B(Payee)
Co. B(Payee)
Co. B(Payee)
As at Aug 2012 As at Dec 2012 As at Apr 2013
Court interpretation
RD’s interpretation CTC’s interpretation
No cross shareholding mustexist from the beginning ofthe accounting period towhich the dividend relatesto the date the actualpayment is made.
All that is required is that the cross
No condition that crossshareholding must not exist fromthe start of an accounting period.
All that is required is that the crossshareholding does not exist at thetime the dividend is declared.
PwC Slide 1229-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
RD cannot impose conditions that do not exist under the laws.
Return of Capital
PwC Slide 1329-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Capital Reduction
• Payments in a capital reduction areconsidered assessable income in anamount equal to the “sum of profitsand reserves”.
ForeignCo. and reserves”.
• Cross border payments of such assessableincome are subject to a final WHT.
• Since these amounts are, technically, not“dividends” under Thai law, the defaultWHT of 15% will apply when payments aremade to a foreign shareholder.
Co.
100%
Proceeds fromcapitalreduction
Overseas
Thailand
PwC Slide 1429-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
TH Co.
Capital Reduction payments – Taxation
• Since Sec 40(4)(d) income is not“dividend” under Thai law, theexpectation was that a 15% WHT would
FrenchCo. expectation was that a 15% WHT would
apply as it would be treated as “otherincome” in the tax treaty.
• “Other income” under the tax treaty hasno preferential tax rate.
• Indeed, this was the RD own position inthe past (specifically in a case involvingthe Thai-France treaty).
Co.
100%
Proceeds fromcapitalreduction –15% WHT
France
Thailand
PwC Slide 1529-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
the Thai-France treaty).
• RD interpretation on taxable capitalreduction being considered as “dividend”is more or less in line with OECDCommentary on Model Treaties.
TH Co.
Capital Reduction- Balance Sheet of taxpayer
B/S Before Capitalreduction
After
Capital 1,000 (750) 250
• In a recent ruling, the RevenueDepartment did not permit net off ofretained losses with the Legal ReserveCapital 1,000 (750) 250
Retained loss (900) (900) (900)
Legal reserve 100 100 100
Net Equity
Payment ofassessableincome
200
100
(550)
retained losses with the Legal Reservewhen arriving at the taxable income in acapital reduction.
• Revenue Department then treated thetaxable income as a payment of “dividend”under the Thai-USA tax treaty andimposed a 10% WHT.
• This interpretation could impact allcompanies with retained losses who plan
PwC Slide 1629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
income
“Cannot net off retainedloss against legal reserve”
companies with retained losses who planto pay out cash in a capital reduction.
Capital Reduction – Planning points
• A Public Company Limited that hasretained losses and is planning a payment
B/S Pre-restructure
Postrestructure retained losses and is planning a payment
of cash in a capital reduction may firstwrite-off Legal Reserve against availableRetained Losses.
- It can then undertake a capitalreduction for cash.
• Private companies should be prepared topay a WHT if there is a cash payment in acapital reduction.
restructure restructure
Capital 1,000 1,000
Retainedloss
(900) (800)
Legalreserve
100 100
Net Equity 200 200
PwC Slide 1729-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
capital reduction.
- The Company can seek a ruling for a10% WHT rate (not 15%), if the foreignshareholder is tax resident in anfavorable treaty jurisdiction.
Net Equity
Payment ofassessableincome
200
100
200
NIL
Taxation of Liquidation Proceeds
PwC Slide 1829-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Liquidation Proceeds – Dividends or Otherincome?
• Proceeds from amalgamation ordissolution of a company whichexceeds the “subscription price”
ForeignCo. exceeds the “subscription price”
is taxable income.
• This is subject to Thai WHT and,since this income is not “dividends”,the WHT applied in the past was15%.
• A recent ruling indicates that thisincome can be considered a
Co.
100%
Liquidationproceeds
Overseas
Thailand
PwC Slide 1929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
income can be considered a“deemed dividend” and 10% WHTapplied.
• This is of interest to companies thathave entities in liquidation.
TH Co.
• Sec 40(4)(f) taxes liquidationproceeds less “subscription price”.
ForeignCo
Liquidation Proceeds – Dividends or Otherincome?
• “Subscription price” has beeninterpreted by the RevenueDepartment to mean “cost ofacquisition” rather than“subscription price”, making theincome similar to “capital gains”.
• WHT applied in the past was 15%.
Co
LiquidationProceeds
Overseas
Thailand
PwC Slide 2029-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
• WHT applied in the past was 15%.
• But many DTAs exempt capital gainsfrom Thai WHT.
TH Co.
In a recent ruling, a TH Co paidliquidation proceeds to its UK parent
Liquidation Proceeds – Dividends or Otherincome?
UK Co.liquidation proceeds to its UK parent
Liquidation proceeds includedaccumulated retained earnings.
Revenue Department ruled that theincome
Is a “dividend” under Thai-UK
100%
LiquidationProceeds
UK
Thailand
PwC Slide 2129-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Is a “dividend” under Thai-UKDTA (Article 11)
Subject to 10% WHTTH Co.
Interestingly, Revenue Departmentapplied the domestic dividend WHT
Liquidation Proceeds – Dividends or Otherincome?
UK Co. applied the domestic dividend WHTalthough the income is not “dividend”under domestic regulations.
Revenue Department ignored thehigher Thai-UK tax treaty rate of 15%on “dividends”.
UK Co.
100%
LiquidationProceeds
UK
Thailand
PwC Slide 2229-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
TH Co.
Liquidation Proceeds – Planning points
• If tax treaty protection is essentialto benefit from a 10% WHT, a non-
ForeignCo to benefit from a 10% WHT, a non-
treaty shareholder, an investmentmust be held through anappropriate treaty location.
• To ensure 10% WHT (even withouttax treaty protection), TH Coshould pay out the maximumamount of retained earnings asdividend, prior to being put into
Co
LiquidationProceeds
Overseas
Thailand
PwC
dividend, prior to being put intoliquidation.
29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014Slide 23
TH Co.
Royalties
PwC Slide 2429-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
NetherlandsFact:
Recent Case Law: Payment based on % of sale notbeing regarded as royalty
NetherlandsCo.
100%
Thai Co. has entered into twoagreements i.e., an intellectual propertylicense agreement and an offshoreservice agreement.
The consideration were paid for twoelements which were monthly flat feeand variable fee.
1. Fixedmonthlypayments
2.Paymentsbased on% of sales
PwC Slide 2529-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Thai Co.
and variable fee.
Netherlands
Recent Case Law: Payment based on % of sale notbeing regarded as royalty
CTC judgment no. 304/2548NetherlandsCo.
100%
1. Fixedmonthlypayments
2.Paymentsbased on% of sales
CTC judgment no. 304/2548
Royalties were disguised in thepayments based on % of sales andfixed monthly payments.
SC judgment no. 13993/2555
The taxpayer has provided
PwC Slide 2629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Thai Co.
The taxpayer has providedsufficient evidence to prove thatthe payment was for generalprofessional services.
Key take-away
Economic substance is required to distinguish between “know-how”
Recent Case Law: Payment based on % of sale notbeing regarded as royalty
Economic substance is required to distinguish between “know-how”rather than “show-how”.
The Supreme Court has laid out some basic principles of evidence:
• Show-how: Application of information being provided during thecourse of the provision of these services are not confidential but areavailable in the public domain.
PwC Slide 2729-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
available in the public domain.
• Know-how: Specific knowledge or commercial industrialinformation required for the business was already being paid forseparately in addition to hiring experts required for the line ofbusiness.
Double Taxation Agreements
PwC Slide 2829-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Impact of new terms in DTA
PwC Slide 2929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Thailand and Taipei DTA
• Thailand-Taipei DTA became effective since 1 January 2013.
• 5% withholding tax on dividend for substantial holdings (at least25% interest)
• 10% withholding tax on dividend in all other cases
• 10% withholding tax on royalties
• These lower tax treaty rates impact Thailand’s other tax
PwC
• These lower tax treaty rates impact Thailand’s other taxtreaties with a “most-favored nation” clause.
Slide 3029-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Most-Favored Nation Clause
UAE- If more favorable treatment (Article 8, 10 and 11)* is granted
under the Agreement Thailand concluded with other countries,under the Agreement Thailand concluded with other countries,the same favorable treatment shall be automaticallyapplied to residents of UAE.
* Ships operating in international traffic, dividend and interest income
Mauritius- If lower tax rates (Article 8, 10, 11 and 12)** are granted to other
countries, the lower tax rates shall be applied to residents ofMauritius.
PwC
Mauritius.** Ships operating in international traffic, dividend , interest and royalty income
What is the legal position in Thailand? Will “automatic”application be accepted?
Slide 3129-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Changes in DTA
PwC Slide 3229-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Development on amending/negotiation DTAs
• Reduction of withholding tax rate on dividend
(e.g., recent Thai-Taiwan DTA has a lower tax rate on dividend(5%) than any other of Thailand’s tax treaties)
• Granting underlying tax credit
PwC Slide 3329-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Impact of reduction WHT rate on dividends
FCo.This will benefit for foreign shareholdersinvesting into Thai company by
5% WHT ondividends
Overseas
Thailand
investing into Thai company by
• Reducing the effective tax rate ofThai operations from 28% to 24%.
• Reducing the risk of inability to claimexcess WHT as a credit in therecipient’s jurisdiction.
PwC Slide 3429-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
TH Co.
Underlying tax credit
• The granting of underlying tax credit may yield benefits to Thaiinvestors only in very limited circumstances.investors only in very limited circumstances.
• This can be illustrated on three sample cases.
• A key assumption is that (like some other tax treaties with similarclauses), the underlying tax credit is available only for asubstantial shareholding of 25% or more.
PwC Slide 3529-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Underlying tax credit
TH Co.
• TH Co. invests in UK Co. through a holdingcompany located in Mauritius.
• UK Co. is subject to 25% CIT.
Example A
0%
Mauritius
Thailand• Dividends distributed by UK OpCo. is exempt
from UK WHT.
• Dividend would be subject to tax in Mauritiusat the rate of 15% but no tax is paid due tounderlying tax credit given by MAU Co.
• Dividends paid by MAU Co. to TH Co. wouldbe exempt from Thai tax under RD 442.
≥ 25%
MAU Co.
UK
15%
PwC Slide 3629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
CIT rate at25%
UK(OpCo.)
be exempt from Thai tax under RD 442.
“No additional benefit to TH Co.from an underlying tax credit”
UK
TH Co.• TH Co. invests in UK OpCo.
• UK OpCo. is subject to CIT at the rate of0% (RD 442)
Example B
Underlying tax credit
Thailand
• UK OpCo. is subject to CIT at the rate of25%.
• Dividends distributed by UK OpCo. ToTH Co. would be exempt from UKWHT.
• Dividends received by TH Co. would beexempt from Thai tax under RD 442.
≥ 25%
UK
PwC Slide 3729-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
CIT at therate of 25%
UK(OpCo.)
“No additional benefit to THCo. from an underlying taxcredit”
TH Co. CIT at therate of 20%
Example C
Underlying tax credit
• TH Co. invests in ABC which is subject toCIT at the rate of 10% (less than 15%).
Thailand
≥ 25%
Overseas
rate of 20% • Dividends distributed by ABC to TH Co.is subject to 10% WHT.
• Due to the underlying tax credit rules,the foreign dividend is not subject toThai taxation.
• Under current rules, due to the headlinetax rate being <15% foreign dividendincome would be taxed at 20%, with a
DividendWHT 10%
PwC Slide 3829-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Headline taxrate 10%
ABC
income would be taxed at 20%, with acredit for the 10% WHT.
“Beneficial to Thai investor”
Proposed changes in DTA
• Thai-Singapore DTA
- Extending the period from 6 months to 12 months on building site,construction, installation or assembly;
- Time test of 183 days for furnishing of services; and
- Reducing withholding tax for the payment for the use of softwarefrom 15% to 5%.
PwC
There will be some benefits in terms of proposed changes inThailand-Singapore DTA which will be discussed in next slide.
Slide 3929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Example: Extending time test on building site
• Attractive to certain foreigninvestors, (e.g. China
CH Co.
investors, (e.g. Chinainvestors) who mayundertake EPC contracts viaa Singapore subsidiary.
• Attractive to foreigninvestors who mayundertake EPC contracts inSingapore via a Thai
China
EPC
Thailand6-monthtest
SG Co.
Singapore
EPC
Thailand12-monthtest
PwC Slide 4029-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Singapore via a Thaisubsidiary – this is especiallyso if combined with areduced WHT on crossborder dividends
TH Co. TH Co.
Proposed changes in DTA
SG Co.Thai-Singapore DTA
Thailand
• Attractive to Thai softwarelicensors BoI privileges
• Reduction of Singapore WHT onsoftware licensing from thepresent 10% to 5% results is acash tax saving of 5%.
Softwarelicensing
Singapore
5% WHT onlicensing fees
“Beneficial to Thai
PwC Slide 4129-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
TH Co.
“Beneficial to Thaisoftware licensors with
BoI privileges”
Section two – Base Erosion and Profiting Shifting(BEPS)
2.1 Overview of BEPS
2.2 BEPS - 15 action points
2.3 What changes can we expect in Thailand?
PwC29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Slide 42
Overview of BEPS
PwC Slide 4329-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Overview of BEPS
What is BEPS?
How will it affect internationaltaxation?
How could it influence Thairevenue authorities?
How could it affect the Thai tax
PwC
How could it affect the Thai taxlaws?
How could it affect Thailand’s taxtreaties?
29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014Slide 44
Overview of BEPS
An OECD action plan to addressthe perceived flaws in internationaltaxation rules.
Comprehensive action planconsists of 15 actions to beimplemented by September 2014or September 2015.
Could affect/require bilateralagreements
PwC Slide 4529-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
agreements
What is driving BEPS?
Austerity. Governments carryinglarge fiscal deficits and fundinglarge fiscal deficits and fundingcosts.
The public.
Non -government organisations.
The press.
Tax controversy regardingapplication of tax law to
PwC
application of tax law tomultinationals’ operations.
Slide 4629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Who is driving BEPS?
G20.
OECD – A multilateral instrumentto amend bilateral treaties.to amend bilateral treaties.
Other non-member nations invitedto participate as Invitees.
Local tax jurisdictions may imposetheir domestic legislation inresponse to or in lieu ofimplementing BEPS.
PwC
Consultation of non-governmentorganisations.
Slide 4729-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
What is BEPS trying to do?
Tax cross bordertransactions on a“substance” rather than“substance” rather thanform basis.
Prevent “double non-taxation”.
Reduce “treaty shopping”.
PwC
Reduce “treaty shopping”.
Reduce avoidance andevasion.
Slide 4829-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
What is BEPS trying to do?
Enhance co-operationbetween taxing authorities.
Tax transparency – Automaticexchange of information fromsource to residence country.
Multilateral agreement forexchange of information?
PwC
exchange of information?
Slide 4929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
What is BEPS addressing?
General actions:
• The digital economy.• The digital economy.
• Hybrid mismatch arrangements.
• CFC rules.
• Interest and management feedeductions.
• Harmful tax practices – actionsof states.
PwC
of states.
Slide 5029-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
What is BEPS addressing?
Other actions:
• Treaty actions preventing abuse.
• Permanent establishment.• Permanent establishment.
• Transfer pricing - I.P.
• Data and transparency.
Steps to actions:
• Review OECD country regimes.
• Expand participation for non
PwC
• Expand participation for nonOECD members.
• Revise criteria on harmfulpractices.
Slide 5129-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
BEPS – 15 action points
PwC Slide 5229-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Action 1 (September 2014)Address the challenges of the digital economy
Action
• Priority action.
Impact
• Digital economy has less of a• Priority action.
• Difficulties with application ofinternational tax rules.
• Generation of value.
• Direct and indirect taxation.
• Review of business models.
• Digital economy has less of apresence in Thailand.
• More focus on indirect taxationof the digital economy?
PwC Slide 5329-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Action 2 (September 2014)Neutralise the Effects of Hybrid MismatchArrangements
Action ImpactAction
• Hybrids used to achieveunintended double non-taxation or long term taxdeferral.
• Develop model treatyprovisions.
Impact
• Existing hybrid arrangementsmay lose their tax benefits,impacting the IRR of Thaioutbound investments.
PwC
• Hybrid instruments and entities.
Slide 5429-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Hybrid instrument example – RedeemablePreference Shares
• AusCo issues redeemable preferenceshares (RPS) that is considered “debt”Netherlands
“Dividend”received on RPStax-exempt shares (RPS) that is considered “debt”
for Australian tax.
• Dividends to RPS are considered“interest” for Australia tax.Consequently the dividends are taxdeductible and subject to interest 10%WHT.
• Netherlands considers the returns onRPS as “dividend” and thus exempts it
tax-exempt
Dividendpayment onRPS
PwC
RPS as “dividend” and thus exempts itfrom taxation.
• We get “double non-taxation” ofinterest/dividend on RPS.
29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014Slide 55
Australia“Dividend” paid
on RPS taxdeductible
Action 3 (September 2015)Strengthen CFC rules
Action
• Reduces incentive to shift profits
Impact
• Avoidance of Thai taxation by• Reduces incentive to shift profitsinto a third, low-tax jurisdiction.
• Recommend design of domesticrules.
• Avoidance of Thai taxation bydeferring receipt of dividendcommon technique.
• Revenue Code would need to beamended to include CFC rules.
PwC Slide 5629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
CFC - example
• Tax Haven Co is controlled bythe UK.UK Co
Tax rate 28%
Interest incomeof tax haven the UK.
• Tax Haven tax rates <75% ofUK tax rate (currently 28%)
• If Tax Haven Co does not meetthe (entity and income)exemptions, it is considered aCFC.
• Consequently,
Tax rate 28%
Tax Haven Co
100%Equity
Earns interest
of tax haventaxed in UK
PwC
• Consequently,
• A part of the profits of TaxHaven Co are taxed in the UK.
29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014Slide 57
Tax Haven Co
Relending
Earns interestincome
CFC – example 2
• Foreign subsidiaries arecontrolled by the Aus Co.Aus Co
Taxed on incomeof 500K, as if controlled by the Aus Co.
• Foreign companies qualify asCFCs (if they do not meet theCFC exemptions).
• Consequently,
• Profits of CFC2 and CFC 1 aretaxed in hands of Aus Co as ifCFC1 and CFC2 are Australian
Aus Co
Foreign CFC1
100%
Earns income$300K
of 500K, as ifCFC1 &2 are Austax payers
PwC
CFC1 and CFC2 are Australiantaxpayers.
29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014Slide 58
Foreign CFC2Earns income$200K
Action 4 (September 2015)Limit base erosion via Interest/FinancialDeductions
Action ImpactAction
• Inbound and outbound.
• Financial and performanceguarantees, derivatives andcaptive and other insurancearrangements.
• Recommend design of domestic
Impact
• Cross border impact intoThailand may require a reviewof gearing.
• Outbound financialarrangements (even viaoffshore financing companies)may be impacted.
PwC
• Recommend design of domesticrules/changes to transfer pricingguidelines.
Slide 5929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
may be impacted.
• Revenue Department reportedly isready to introduce thin capitalizationrules and expects to include this is a
Thin capitalization in Thailand
rules and expects to include this is apart of the anti-avoidance rulesapplicable to internationaltransactions.
• No discussion drafts have beencirculated 2 key points are unclear
• Will the rules consider only relatedparty debt, or ALL debt incalculating the ratio.
Fixed D/Eratio?
Justificationof
excessivedebt
Definition:Debt vs.Equity
PwC
calculating the ratio.
29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014Slide 60
• Will the rules be prescriptive, like theBOI (e.g. fixed debt equity ratio 3:1) or
• Flexible, with each taxpayer being
Thin capitalization in Thailand
• Flexible, with each taxpayer beingpermitted to justify quantum of debt,with an overall safe harbour (e.g. as inAustralia).
• Thai entities may need to re-structuretheir “excess” debt into equity orinterest free loans (after factoringconsequences in the lending
Fixed D/Eratio?
Justificationof
excessivedebt
Definition:Debt vs.Equity
PwC
consequences in the lendingjurisdiction).
29-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014Slide 61
Action 5 (September 2014/2015)Counter harmful tax practices – transparency andsubstance
Action ImpactAction
• “Race to the bottom” on mobileincome tax base.
• Improve transparency.
• Substance for preferentialtreatment.
Impact
• Is Thailand a “tax haven” in thecontext of BOI privileges?
• Shifting profits impacted.
• Countries may require“substantial business activities”to access tax treaty network or
PwC Slide 6229-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
to access tax treaty network orpreferential rates – or bypassthe treaty.
Potential immediate impactProcurement centre
Currently used for:
• To shift profits to Singapore toTH Co • To shift profits to Singapore totake advantage of lower tax rate(5%-17%).
Potential BEPS impact:
• Thailand may require SGP Co tohave more substance.
SGP Co
TH Co
EuropeVendor
100$
100% 105$
PwC
have more substance.
• Thailand tax authorities mayattack transfer price.
Slide 6329-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Vendor
Potential immediate impactTransparency
“Aggressive tax planning” disclosure
• Publicly available information of parentcould trigger tax audits of Thai affiliates.could trigger tax audits of Thai affiliates.
Call for “automatic exchange ofinformation” by Global Tax Forum(OECD/G20)
• May impact structures that rely on lessthan full disclosure of information.
Characterisation of management fees and
PwC
head office allocations as “base erosiontechniques”
• Support Thai tax authorities in theirassessment of local affiliates.
Slide 6429-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Action 6 (September 2014)Prevent treaty abuse
Action
• Treaty benefits in inappropriate
Impact
• Thai concept of beneficial• Treaty benefits in inappropriatecircumstances.
• Double non-taxation.
• Restore source taxation.
• Recommend design of domesticrules/changes to model taxconvention.
• Thai concept of beneficialownership is legal and noteconomical owner. Form oversubstance.
• Anti-conduit rules in otherjurisdictions could impact“overseas holding company”strategies.
PwC
convention.
Slide 6529-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
strategies.
Potential immediate impactTreaty shopping
Currently used to:
• Reduce WHT on dividend income fromTH Co • Reduce WHT on dividend income fromIndonesia.
• Save capital gains tax on exit (due toparticipation exemption in theNetherlands and Indonesia tax exemptionon capital gains under the Netherlands-Indonesia tax treaty).
Potential BEPS impact:
TH Co
NetherlandsDividend
100%
DividendWHT@15%
PwC
• Netherlands could require more substancefor certificate of tax residency.
• Indonesia may deny treaty WHT rate orcapital gains exemption due to lack ofsubstance in the Netherlands.
Slide 6629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Indonesia
DividendWHT@10%
100%
Potential immediate impactDebt push down
Currently used for:
• Interest withholding taxTH Co • Interest withholding taxreductions in OpCo.
• TH foreign dividend exemption.
Potential BEPS impact:
• Foreign dividend exemption/debtdeductions denied.
MauritiusCo
TH Co
SGP Co
100%
100%
Equity
Debt
PwC
deductions denied.
• Preferential interest WHT ratedenied.
Slide 6729-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
SGP Co
Indo opCo
100%Debt
Action 7 (September 2015)Prevent artificial avoidance of PE status
Action
• Update permanent
Impact
• Attribution of profit by Thai• Update permanentestablishment definition.
• Commissionaire arrangements.
• Changes to model taxconvention.
• Attribution of profit by ThaiRevenue authorities couldresult in higher taxation?
• Could impact structures thatrely on an overly technicalinterpretation of the PE rules(e.g. Buying agents, OffshoreFund managers)?
PwC Slide 6829-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Fund managers)?
Action 8 (September 2014/2015)Assure that Transfer pricing outcomes are in linewith Value creation
Action ImpactAction
• Transfers of intangibles amonggroup members.
• Alignment of returns with valuecreation
• Recharacterise transactions
• Changes to transfer pricing
Impact
• Could affect a jurisdictionsconcessions for bringing IP intoa country?
• “Value creation” as a criterionfor allocation of residualincome
PwC
• Changes to transfer pricingguidelines and possibly themodel tax convention.
Slide 6929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
• Intra-group contracts may notbe respected
• How to manage transfer pricingrequirements?
Potential immediate impactRoyalty repatriation
Currently used for:
• Concessional WHT rates onTH Co • Concessional WHT rates onroyalty.
• Concessional tax rates inCyprus.
Potential BEPS impact:
• Cyprus forced to increase
Cyprus
TH Co
UK
Sell
I.P 100%
LicenseRoyaltyPayments100%
PwC
• Cyprus forced to increasetax rates.
• UK denies preferentialWHT rate due to no“substance” in Cyprus.
Slide 7029-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
UK
Potential immediate impactPrincipal structures
Current tax benefits:
• Utilisation of Singapore’sTH Co • Utilisation of Singapore’sconcessionary tax regime (0%-10%) for profits accruing toPrincipal structures.
Potential BEPS impact:
• Thai authorities could attributemore profit to the Thai
SGP Co
TH Co
OverseasBuyers
Sale
Resale
100%
100%
PwC
more profit to the Thaioperations.
Slide 7129-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Buyers
Action 11 (September 2015)Establish methodologies to collect and analysedata on BEPS and the actions to address it
Action ImpactAction
• Tools available to monitor andevaluate the effectiveness andeconomic impact of actions takento address BEPS on an ongoingbasis.
• Recommendations regardingdata to be collected and
Impact
• What will be the impact of theanalysis? Will the proposedactions be continuallyrevisited? Certainty fortaxpayers?
PwC
data to be collected andmethodologies to analyse them.
Slide 7229-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Action 12 (September 2015)Require Taxpayers to disclose their aggressive taxplanning arrangements
Action ImpactAction
• Enable governments to quicklyidentify risk areas.
• Co-operative complianceprogrammes between taxpayersand tax administrations.
• Recommendations regarding the
Impact
• “Aggressive tax planning”.
• Evasion versus avoidance.
• Is there a legal basisdomestically to requiredisclosure?
PwC
• Recommendations regarding thedesign of domestic rules.
Slide 7329-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Action 13 (September 2014)Re-examine transfer pricing documentation
Action
• Transfer pricing and value-chain
Impact
• Will business become more• Transfer pricing and value-chainanalyses.
• Asymmetry of informationbetween taxpayers and taxadministrations. “Big picture”view of a taxpayer’s global valuechain.
• Changes to transfer pricing
• Will business become moreconservative?
• Group transfer pricingpolicies/documentation.
PwC
• Changes to transfer pricingguidelines andrecommendations regarding thedesign of domestic rules.
Slide 7429-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Action 14 (September 2015)Make dispute resolution mechanisms moreeffective
Action ImpactAction
• Develop solutions to addressobstacles that prevent countriesfrom solving treaty-relateddisputes under MAP.
• Changes to the model taxconvention.
Impact
• Increased co-operation betweengovernment’s taxation authorities.
PwC Slide 7529-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Action 15 (December 2015)Develop a multilateral instrument
Action
• Develop a multilateral instrument to
Impact
• The proposal is to make existing• Develop a multilateral instrument toenable jurisdictions that wish to doso to implement measuresdeveloped on BEPS and amendbilateral tax treaties.
• Report identifying relevant publicinternational law and tax issues.
• The proposal is to make existingbilateral OECD model treatiesdynamic by creating a multilateraltreaty amendment document akinto the International Swaps andDerivatives Association masterswaps agreement.
• Signatories automatically acceptamendments/ interpretations
PwC Slide 7629-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
amendments/ interpretationscontained in the document for theirin- force treaties.
• This side-steps need for treaty re-negotiations.
What changes can we expect inThailand?
PwC Slide 7729-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
What changes can we expect in Thailand?
OECD expected outputs are“Recommendations regarding thedesign of domestic rules”.
• Introduction of thin capitalisationrules
• Anti-avoidance rules
Will this influence the Thai tax laws?
• Anti-avoidance rules
• Look for more “substance” inentities claiming tax treaty relief
• More aggressive audit environment
• Non-deductibles subject to 10%WHT?
PwC Slide 7829-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Contact
Paul B.A. StittPartnerTel: +66 (0) 2344 1119
Vanida VasuwanichchanchaiExecutive DirectorTel: +66 (0) 2344 1303Tel: +66 (0) 2344 1119
Prema RaoExecutive DirectorTel: +66 (0) 2344 [email protected]
Tel: +66 (0) 2344 [email protected]
Orawan PhanitpojjamarnDirectorTel: +66 (0) 2344 [email protected]
PwC
Slide 7929-30 October 201315th Annual Conference Maximise Shareholder Value through Effective TAX Planning 2014
Thank you
© 2013 PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal & Tax Consultants Ltd. All rights reserved.'PricewaterhouseCoopers' and/or 'PwC' refers to the individual members of thePricewaterhouseCoopers organisation in Thailand, each of which is a separate andindependent legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.